PurposeThe safety and efficacy of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF) for prevention of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) in patients undergoing oral chemotherapy remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of PEG-rhG-CSF as primary prophylaxis for CIN in gastrointestinal (GI) cancer patients receiving combination chemotherapy regimens that include oral chemotherapy agents.MethodsThis is a prospective, single-center, open-label, exploratory, non-randomized controlled study. GI cancer patients was treated with intravenous oxaliplatin (130mg/m2 on day 1) combined with either oral capecitabine (1000mg/m2) or S−1 (an oral fluoropyrimidine combination of tegafur, gimeracil, and oteracil potassium; 40–60 mg) administered twice daily on days 1–14 of a 3−week cycle. The treatment group received subcutaneous injection of PEG-rhG-CSF (6mg) 24 hours after oxaliplatin, while the control group received no primary prophylaxis. The primary endpoint was safety, and secondary endpoints included the incidence of CIN.ResultsBetween March 2022 and January 2023, 49 patients were screened, and 43 patients who completed at least two treatment cycles were included in the final analysis (26 in treatment group and 17 in control group). The overall adverse events (AEs) did not differ statistically (93.8% vs 100.0%, p = 0.542). For grade ≥ 3 AEs, the incidence of neutropenia was significantly lower in the treatment group compared to the control group (3.1% vs 35.3%, p = 0.005). No significant differences were observed in the rates of grade ≥ 3 thrombocytopenia (6.3% vs 17.6%, p = 0.326) and leukopenia (3.1% vs 0.0%, p = 1.000). Grade≥2 CIN was significantly lower in the treatment group (25.0% vs. 76.5%, p < 0.001).ConclusionIn GI cancer patients on oral agents, primary PEG-rhG-CSF prophylaxis was well-tolerated and reduced grade ≥2 CIN, though randomized studies are needed.Clinical Trial Registrationhttps://www.chictr.org.cn, identifier ChiCTR2100054854.

This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of camrelizumab combined with platinum-based chemotherapy (taxanes [T] or fluorouracil agents [F] plus platinum [P] drugs) as the first-line treatment in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), using immune repertoire sequencing (IRS) to explore treatment response mechanism. In this multi-center, prospective cohort study, 88 patients received camrelizumab plus TP or FP, achieving a 1-year progression-free survival of 56.8% and overall survival of 68.2%. The objective response rate (ORR) was 64.8%, with a disease control rate of 91.1%. While most treatment-related adverse events were mild, 12.5% of patients experienced grade ≥3 toxicities. IRS showed significant differences in T-cell receptor (TCR) β-chain and immunoglobulin heavy chain between patients with (ORR group) or without ORR (non-ORR group), particularly in the distribution and expression of some genes. Specifically, we found the significant differences in the amino acid composition of complementarity determining region 3 (CDR3) polypeptide sequences in TCR and B-cell receptor (BCR) between the ORR and non-ORR groups. For TCR, we observed substantial oligoclonal enrichment and differences in the abundance of specific V and J genes. Similarly, for BCR, we detected differences in the clonotype abundance of CDR3 polypeptide segments and identified several differential V genes. Camrelizumab combined with platinum-based chemotherapy is effective and well-tolerated as the first-line treatment for ESCC, and IRS may reveal mechanism influencing treatment response.

Gastric cancer mesenchymal stem cells (GC-MSCs) are a crucial component of the gastric cancer microenvironment, exerting a pivotal influence on the formation of a suppressive immune microenvironment and the progression of gastric cancer. In this study, we utilized GC-MSCs to co-culture peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) obtained from both gastric cancer patients and healthy individuals in a proportionate manner by direct cell-to-cell contact. Our findings reveal that co-culture of GC-MSCs with PBMCs led to a notable reduction in CD8+ T cells percentages and an increase in surface PD-1 expression levels on CD8+ T cells. However, flow cytometry analysis demonstrated no significant changes following pretreatment with GC-MSC-conditioned medium (GC-MSC-CM). Moreover, western blotting analysis demonstrated a notable reduction in phosphorylated AKT levels in co-cultured PBMCs. Collectively, our results suggest that GC-MSCs impair the anti-tumor immune response of PBMCs by elevating the PD-1 levels of CD8+ T cells and impairing the killing of CD8+ T cells. These findings provide new evidence that GC-MSCs contribute to immunosuppression within the tumor microenvironment (TME).

Exercise training can prevent anxiety disorders in both rodent models and human cohorts. The involvement of peripheral factors in exercise-mediated mental health is being appreciated. It is recently shown that the hepatic biosynthesis of lipocalin-2 (LCN2) can respond to chronic restraint stress (CRS) and elicit anxiety-like behaviors via inhibiting the neural activity in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC). Here, it is found that 14-day treadmill exercise training ameliorates anxiety-like behaviors in these CRS-treated mice. Further assays show that exercise intervention reduces the hepatic release of LCN2. Meanwhile, exercise training may also counteract the adverse effect of LCN2 via relieving the cortical microglial cell proliferation. The results collectively suggest that exercise training may modulate the liver-brain axis to reshape the cortical activity for preventing anxiety disorders.

2635 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown significant efficacy in metastatic gastric cancer, but some patients may not respond to them because of immune resistance. Recombinant Human Adenovirus Type 5 (H101), the world’s first oncolytic virus antitumor drug in China, can induce cell death, expose tumor antigens, provide adjuvants for anti-tumor immune priming, and potentially increase responsiveness to immunotherapies. Here, we presented the efficacy and safety of H101 combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with liver metastatic gastric cancer. Methods: In this multi-center, phase II trial (the TROJAN 021 study, ChiCTR1900027922), patients with liver metastatic gastric cancer received 2 cycles of H101 ultrasound guided injections into liver lesions, bi-weekly in combination with anti-PD-1 antibodies and chemotherapy bi-weekly until progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary objective was safety and objective response rate (ORR). Secondary objective included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and disease control rate (DCR). Efficacy assessments were performed every 4 weeks following RECIST v1.1 criteria. PFS and OS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: From September 2020 to September 2022, 21 patients were enrolled. Of them, 18 were males, median age was 66 years (range: 36-71) and ECOG performance status was either 0 (n=15) or 1 (n=6). 10 patients (47.6%) received as first-line therapy, 1 (4.8%) as second-line and 5 (23.8%) as third line and above therapy. The primary endpoint was met with a median PFS of 4.8 months. The median OS was 13.2 months. Objective tumor responses were CR (n=0), PR (n=7), SD (n=12) and PD (n=2). ORR was 33.3% (7/21), and DCR was 90.5% (19/21). Treatment related adverse events (TRAE) occurred in 12 patients (57.1%). The most frequently observed TRAEs were injection site pain (48.1%), fever (57.1%) and fatigue (23.8%). Three patients (14.3%) had grade 3 treatment-related adverse events. There were no grade 4 and 5 treatment-related adverse events. Grades 3 toxicities included neutropenia (2/21, 9.5%) and hypertension (1/21, 4.8%). Conclusions: These promising results show that combination of Recombinant Human Adenovirus Type 5 (H101) and ICIs demonstrated acceptable toxicity and promising antitumor efficacy in patients with liver metastatic gastric cancer. Further validation of the efficacy in a randomized prospective trial is warranted. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR1900027922.

Migrasomes are newly identified cellular organelles with a pomegranate-like structure and specifically generated by migrating cells. The mechanisms underlying migrasome biogenesis and methods for their isolation are gradually being elucidated. These organelles are pivotal in cell-to-cell communication and the maintenance of mitochondrial homeostasis. Their involvement in a diverse array of physiological and pathological processes is increasingly recognized. Despite these advancements, research on migrasomes is still in its early stages. It is imperative to delve deeper into the intricate mechanisms and functions of migrasomes to fully understand their role in physiopathology. In this review, we summarize the current research progress on migrasomes, including their distribution, biogenesis, purification and identification techniques, biological functionalities, and roles in physiological and pathological processes. We particularly highlight their potentials in disease diagnosis and therapy and point out the challenges facing us, aiming to provide novel insights into the emerging organelles.

e24107 Background: The safety and efficacy of PEGylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF) for prevention of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) in patients undergoing oral chemotherapy remain unclear. This study investigated the safety and efficacy of PEG-rhG-CSF as primary prophylaxis against CIN in gastrointestinal (GI) cancer patients receiving combination chemotherapy regimens involving oral chemotherapy agents. Methods: This is a prospective, single-center, open-label, exploratory, non-randomized controlled study. GI cancer patients receiving two consecutive cycles of IV oxaliplatin (150mg/m 2 on day 1) combined with oral capecitabine 1000mg/m 2 or tegafur gimeracil oteracil potassium capsule 40-60mg twice daily on days 1-14 every 3 weeks. PEG-rhG-CSF (6mg) was administered subcutaneously 24 hours post-oxaliplatin treatment in the PEG-rhG-CSF group, while the control group did not receive it. The primary endpoint was safety, and secondary endpoints included CIN incidence and neutropenic complications. The study was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration number ChiCTR2100054854). Results: Between March 2022 and January 2023, a total of 49 patients was screened, and 43 patients completed the treatment (26 in PEG-rhG-CSF group and 17 in control group). The average age was 61.4 years, with 90.7% males and 83.7% having gastric cancer. Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. The overall adverse events (AE) did not differ statistically (88.5% vs. 88.2%, p = 1.000), with grade £2 fatigue and nausea being the most common AEs. Grade 3 platelet reduction showed no significant difference between the two groups (7.69% vs. 17.65%, p = 0.432). Four cases of bone pain (15.4%) and five cases of injection site reactions below grade 3 (19.2%) were observed in the PEG-rhG-CSF group. Grade ≥2 CIN was significantly lower in the PEG-rhG-CSF group (3.84% vs. 58.82%, p < 0.001). One case in the PEG-rhG-CSF group required antibiotic treatment due to febrile neutropenia. Regarding neutropenic complications, the PEG-rhG-CSF group exhibited lower proportion of chemotherapy delay (3.85% vs. 35.29%, p < 0.001) and dose reduction (1.92% vs. 23.53%, p = 0.002). Rescue treatment with rhG-CSF for grade 3/4 CIN was significantly less frequent in the PEG-rhG-CSF group (1.92% vs. 23.53%, p = 0.002). Conclusions: Primary prophylaxis with PEG-rhG-CSF in GI cancer patients undergoing oral capecitabine/tegafur gimeracil oteracil potassium may be safe, without an increased chemotherapy-related AEs, and is associated with a reduced grade ≥2 CIN. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR2100054854.

3147 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors have opened a new chapter in cancer therapy, but the incidence of irAEs caused by them is high, and severe irAEs can be fatal. The current research on irAEs is almost focused on early predictions, and there is a lack of near-term predictions (the cycle before the occurrence of irAEs). Absolute eosinophil count (EO#) has been reported to be associated with immune-related pneumonia, but its association with other systemic irAEs requires further exploration. The aim of this study was to explore the near-term predictive value of neutrophil/lymphocyte (NLR), platelet/lymphocyte (PLR), and EO# for PD-1 inhibitor-induced irAEs. Methods: The data are from tumor patients who received PD-1 inhibitor therapy in our department from July 2019 to May 2021. A total of 146 cases were included, of which 56 had irAEs. The data of NLR, PLR and EO# in the cycle before the occurrence of irAEs (the median number of cycles was the second cycle) were collected, and the data of the second cycle was used as the control for patients without irAEs group. Logistic method was used to analyze the correlation between NLR, PLR and EO# and irAEs, and a predictive model was constructed. The sensitivity and specificity of the model were evaluated by ROC curve. This study was registered on Chinese Clinical Trail Registry (ChiCTR2100049849). Results: A total of 146 tumor patients were included, of which 56 developed at least one irAEs. Grade 1-2 irAEs occurred in 39 cases, grade 3-4 in 12 cases (including cardiac, liver, lung and skin toxicity), grade 5 in 2 cases(including cardiac and lung toxicity), and ungraded in 3 cases. The data of the cycle before the occurrence of irAEs were analyzed. Univariate analysis showed that NLR (odds ratio [OR], 1.4, p< 0.05) and EO# (OR, 12.6, p< 0.05) were associated with irAEs, and multivariate analysis suggested NLR (OR, 1.7, p< 0.001) and EO# (OR, 20.4, p< 0.05) were independent risk factors for irAEs. The prediction model composed of NLR, PLR and EO# had a correct rate of 76.7% (AUC = 0.752) in predicting the occurrence of irAEs in the near-term cycle, with a sensitivity of 51.8% and a specificity of 92.2%; the correct rate of predicting irAEs of grade 3 and above was as high as 91.9% (AUC = 0.778), the sensitivity was 14.3% and the specificity was 99.2%. Conclusions: The model composed of NLR, PLR and EO# may predict the occurrence of irAEs in the near-term cycle, especially the prediction of irAEs above grade 3, which can provide early warning for the occurrence of irAEs. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR2100049849.

e16084 Background: The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) after chemotherapy and targeted therapy has altered the treatment pattern of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, using ICIs alone results in a poor response rate. Fortunately, fundamental research indicates that chemotherapy might trigger immunogenic death of tumor cells by releasing tumor antigens, hence eliminating immune system repression of tumor cells. On this basis, a number of clinical studies, including KEYNOTE-590, CheckmMate-648, ORIENT-15, and ESCORT-1st, on the first-line treatment of ESCC with ICIs coupled with chemotherapy, including fluorouracil or taxol and platinum (PF or TP), were conducted and yielded favorable results. However, the advantage of safety and effectiveness of ICIs combination with PF and TP in Chinese ESCC remains unknown. Furthermore, since the southeast part of Shanxi province has a high prevalence of esophageal cancer, the geographical features of ESCC patients will be examined. Methods: Camrelizumab was maintained after 6 cycles of camrelizumab in combination with PF or TP chemotherapy. From May 2020 to February 2022, our study has included 40 locally progressed and advanced ESCC patients. Camrelizumab was administered in combination with PF to 11 patients and TP to 29 patients. Every 6 weeks, efficacy was examined using RECIST 1.1, and 33 patients were evaluated. This research was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trials Registry (ChiCTR2000037942). Results: The median treatment time was 5.8m. 82.5% (33/40) patients were availably evaluated. The objective response rate (ORR) was 72.7% (24/33) and the disease control rate (DCR) was 97.0% (32/33). There is no statistically significant difference in ORR ( p=0.1779) and DCR ( p=0.1005) between PF and TP (55.6% vs 79.2%, 88.9% vs 100%) regimens. At this moment, mPFS has not been achieved. The most common adverse events (AEs) were anemia (22.5%, 9/40), lymphocytopenia (15%, 6/40), neutropenia(15%, 6/40), reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation (RCCEP) (12.5%, 5/40) and fatigue (7.5%, 3/40). Thrombocytopenia (2.5%, 1/40), neutropenia (2.5%, 1/40) and leukopenia (2.5%, 1/40) were the most common grade 3 or 4 toxicities The most frequently reported immune-related AEs were RCCEP (12.5%, 5/40) and hypothyroidism (7.5%, 3/40). There were no new significant adverse events. Conclusions: Camrelizumab in combination with chemotherapy is a promising regimen with good tolerability in the first-line treatment of ESCC. Compared with FP, TP had more therapeutic advantages, But the result is a stage summary, and further observation is needed. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR2000037942. [Table: see text]

目的 探讨医护与家属协同护理模式对脑肿瘤患儿心理状态及并发症的影响.方法 选取2019年1月至2021年1月青岛市中心医院收治的62例脑肿瘤患儿为研究对象.依据随机数表法分为试验组和对照组,每组31例.对照组采用常规护理,试验组在对照组基础上给予医护与家属协同护理模式.比较两组患儿干预前后心理状态、家属护理能力、患儿舒适度及治疗依从性评分的差异,两组并发症及满意度的差异.结果 干预前,两组焦虑自评量表(SAS)和抑郁自评量表(SDS)评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).干预后,两组SAS、SDS评分均下降,且试验组显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).干预前,两组家属护理能力评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);干预后,两组评分均下降,且试验组显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).干预前,两组患儿舒适度、治疗依从性评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);干预后,两组患儿舒适度、治疗依从性评分均下降且试验组显著高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).试验组总并发症发生率(9.7％)显著低于对照组(45.2％),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);试验组总满意度(93.6％)显著高于对照组(58.1％),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 对脑肿瘤患儿实施医护与家属协同护理模式,可改善患儿心理状态,降低并发症发生率,同时可提高家属护理能力评分及患儿治疗依从性.

Background. Chronic hyperglycemia-induced inflammation is recognized as the most important pathophysiological process in diabetic kidney disease (DKD). As maresin 1 (MaR1) is an extensive anti-inflammatory lipid mediator, the present study investigated the protective role of MaR1 in the pathogenesis of DKD and its clinical relevance. Methods. Serum MaR1 concentrations were analyzed in 104 subjects with normal glucose tolerant, type 2 diabetes (T2DM), or DKD. Streptozotocin (STZ) together with high fat diet was used to induce male C57BL/6 J mice into diabetic mice which were treated with MaR1. Human renal tubule epithelial cells (HK-2 cells) were treated by high glucose for glucotoxicity cell model and transfected with LGR6 siRNA for knockdown with MaR1 added，and detected oxidative stress and inflammatory related factors. Results. Serum MaR1 concentrations were significant decreased in T2DM with or without kidney disease compared with normal participant and were lowest in patients with DKD. Serum MaR1 concentrations were negatively correlated with hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), duration of diabetes, urinary albumin to creatinine ratio (UACR), neutrophil, and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and were positively correlated with high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). In mouse model, MaR1 injection alleviated hyperglycemia, UACR and the pathological progression of DKD. Interestingly, the renal expression of LGR6 was down-regulated in DKD and high glucose treated HK-2 cells but up-regulated by MaR1 treatment. Mechanistically, MaR1 alleviated inflammation via LGR6-mediated cAMP-SOD2 antioxidant pathway in DKD mice and high glucose treated HK-2 cells. Conclusions. Our study demonstrates that decreased serum MaR1 levels were correlated with the development of DKD. MaR1 could alleviate DKD and glucotoxicity-induced inflammation via LGR6-mediated cAMP-SOD2 antioxidant pathway. Thus, our present findings identify MaR1 as a predictor and a potential therapeutic target for DKD.

目的 对雷公藤多苷片联合甲氨蝶呤治疗风湿性关节炎的疗效优势及免疫功能的改善情况予以探讨,旨在制定最佳治疗方案.方法 采取随机数表法对2016年7月～2019年7月期间就诊于内蒙古自治区人民医院的90例类风湿性关节炎患者进行分组,对照组(n=45)使用雷公藤多苷片治疗,观察组(n=45)给予雷公藤多苷片+甲氨蝶呤治疗,对比两组临床症状、免疫功能指标及不良反应.结果 观察组治疗与对照组治疗后相比疼痛程度低、关节压痛数及关节肿胀数减少、僵硬时间缩短,免疫指标中IgG、IgA、IgM水平均降低,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),且两组不良反应发生情况无统计学差异(P>0.05).结论 雷公藤多苷片联合甲氨蝶呤治疗类风湿性关节炎效果更加突出.

40 Background: The single-arm, open-label, multi-center, Phase IV trial of apatinib was conducting in patients (pts) with advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of stomach or gastroesophageal junction with a target sample size of 2000+. We aimed to analyze the effect of region and hospital attributes on clinical outcomes. Methods: From April 2015 to July 2017, 1037 subjects were enrolled, among which 820 were evaluable in the survival analysis. Results: The incidences of adverse events (AEs) and severe AEs (SAEs) are listed in Table. Overall, both incidences were higher in Southern center compared to Northern Center (p=0.002 and <0.001). More SAEs occurred in developed cities (p=0.028) and in hospitals not specialized in oncology (p=0.028). For efficacy, the median overall survival (mOS) of subjects in Northern Center and Southern centers were 8.71 and 5.72 mos (p<0.001), and the median progression free survival (mPFS) was 5.36 and 3.25 mos (p=0.002), respectively. The mOS of subjects in developed and developing cities were 6.18 and 5.72 mos (p=0.105), and the mPFS was 3.02 and 4.73 mos (p=0.013), respectively. The mOS of subjects in hospital specialized and those not in oncology were 7.59 and 5.78 mos (p=0.014), and the mPFS was 4.73 and 3.84 mos (p=0.068), respectively. Conclusions: Region and attribute hospital can affect the safety and clinical outcome of apatinib in treating gastric cancer in the real world. Patients Northern, developing city or hospitals specialized in oncology experience less SAEs but have better clinical benefit. Clinical trial information: NCT02426034. [Table: see text]

35 Background: A fine balance between maintaining efficacy and reducing toxicity is necessary for drug therapies in many cancers. This study seeks to review the data from phase IV clinical trial of Ahead-G201 to help elucidate the optimal initial dose of apatinib in advanced gastric cancer. Methods: Pts data from the Ahead-G201 study at cut-off date of Jul 10, 2017 were extracted to explore the correlation of apatinib initial dose (500 mg vs 850 mg) with safety and clinical efficacy. Results: 864 of eligible pts received apatinib at an initial dose of 500 mg, and 58 pts received at 850 mg. Dose interruption occurred in 258 pts (33.1%) at 500 mg and in 27 pts (46.5%) at 850 mg. For safety, the most common adverse events (AEs) were proteinuria, hypertension and leukocyte decrease in both groups. Moreover, the incidence of all AEs and grade 3-4 AEs in pts at 500 mg was significantly lower than pts at 850 mg (Table). For efficacy, pts at 500 mg achieved an objective response rate (ORR) of 10.8% and a disease control rate (DCR) of 70.6%, at best response, which were 10.3% and 55.2% in pts at 850 mg. Pts at 500 mg got a significantly longer median progression-free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS) than pts at 850 mg (PFS, 4.6 mos vs 2.2 mos; OS, 6.8 mos vs 4.0 mos). Multivariate analysis indicated that apatinib treatment at an initial dose of 500 mg was significantly associated with longer mOS in advanced gastric cancer pts (6.8 mos vs 4.0 mos: hazard ratio, 0.5; 95%CI, 0.3 to 0.8), compared to initial dose of 850 mg. Conclusions: Compared to receiving apatinib at initial dose of 850mg, oral administration of apatinib starting from 500 mg seemed to bring more clinical benefit for patients with advanced gastric cancer, whilst with lower toxicities. Clinical trial information: NCT02426034. [Table: see text]

73 Background: Ahead-G201 is an ongoing open-label, multicenter, post-marketing Phase IV trial assessing safety and efficacy of apatinib in 2000+ patients (pts) with chemotherapy-refractory advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of stomach or gastroesophageal junction. Proteinuria (PTN), hypertension (HTN) and hand-foot-skin reaction (HFSR) are common adverse events (AEs) related to anti-angiogenesis drugs. Methods: As of 2017/7/10, 1037 and 820 pts were evaluable for safety and survival. Clinical outcomes were compared between pts with and without PTN / PTN / HFSR using Kaplan–Meier methods and multivariate Cox regression model. Results: 200 (19.3%), 194 (18.8%) and 115 (11.1%) pts had PTN, HTN and HFSR, respectively. Similar mean daily dosage was found between pts with and without PTN, HTN or HFSR (from 520.6 to 551.0 mg/day). Pts developed PTN / HTN / HFSR had longer median medication durations (57 vs. 33 / 55 vs. 35 / 65 vs. 36 days; p<0.001). However, there was no significant difference in tumor response and progression free survival (PFS) between pts with and without PTN/HTN/HFSR (Table). Only pts had HFSR showed significantly longer overall survival (OS) (8.38 vs. 5.95 months; p=0.0003). After adjusted for baseline and treatment characteristics, presence of HFSR was found to be independently associated with prolonged OS (HR: 1.82 [95%CI, 1.25–2.66]). Conclusions: Occurrence of HFSR is an independent predictor of better OS. Prior analysis based on Phase II and III indicated the relationship between HTN and prolonged OS, which needs to be further analyzed. Clinical trial information: NCT02426034. [Table: see text]

19 Background: Easily detectable and reliable prognostic factors for apatinib response in gastric cancer are of great interest. In this study, 42 characteristics were test for their prognostic value. Methods: Data were collected from the ongoing single-arm phase IV trial in patents (pts) with advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction after failure of ≥2 lines of chemotherapy. Kaplan–Meier and multivariable Cox analysis were conducted. Results: As of 2017/7/10, 1037 pts were enrolled. 820 were evaluable for survival. The median progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was 4.60 and 6.57 m. Age, metastatic lesions, region, treatment interruption, leucocyte decrease and adverse events (AEs) occurrence were independent prognostic factors for PFS, while ECOG PS, disease duration, metastatic lesions, region, developed city, initial dose, treatment interruption, BMI, AST abnormal, hand-foot-skin reaction (HFSR), leucocyte decrease and AE occurrence for OS (Table). Conclusions: Multiple demographics, baseline clinical and laboratory indexes, treatment related indicators and occurrence of AEs can predict the efficacy of apatinib in gastric cancer. Updated results will be reported to guide the clinical application of apatinib. Clinical trial information: NCT02426034. [Table: see text]

126 Background: Old age is a potential negative predictor, and thus is of interest. Data from the ongoing post-marketing Phase IV trial were collected to assess the effect of age on apatinib treatment in 2000+ patients (pts) with chemotherapy-refractory advanced or metastatic gastric cancer. Methods: This subgroup analysis was stratified by age (<65 or ≥65 yrs). Both incidence of adverse events (AEs) and clinical outcomes were compared. Results: 725 pts <65 yrs and 312 pts ≥65 yrs were enrolled (data cut-off 2017/7/10). Differences in gender, ECOG PS, BMI, disease duration and metastatic sites were observed. 68.6% and 39.7% of pts aged ≥65 yrs experienced AEs of any grade and grade ≥3, which were not different with 70.2% and 40.0% of pts aged <65 yrs. The common AE profile was similar, but elderly pts had a higher incidence of hypertension, diarrhea and bilirubin increase (Table). Pts ≥65 yrs showed a higher objective response rate (12.2% vs. 9.9%) and longer overall survival (7.82 vs. 6.05 mos); however, there was no statistical difference. The disease control rate (79.6% vs. 65.4%; p=0.002) and progression free survival (PFS) (5.71 vs. 3.22 mos; p<0.001) of pts ≥65 yrs were significantly superior to pts <65 yrs. Multivariate Cox regression model confirmed that age ≥65 yr was a positive prognostic factor for PFS independent of baseline and treatment characteristics (HR: 0.67 [95%CI, 0.50–0.88]). Conclusions: Pts ≥65 yr is not at increased risk of overall AEs, but hypertension, diarrhea and bilirubin increase should be closely monitored. The PFS benefit in elderly pts will be validated. Clinical trial information: NCT02426034. [Table: see text]

Peritoneal dialysis (PD)-related peritonitis is recognized as a common complication of peritoneal dialysis. Eosinophilic peritonitis is a rare type of non-infection PD-related peritonitis. Eosinophilic peritonitis in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients was first reported in 1967. The cause of eosinophilic peritonitis is obscure, however it may be related to some etiologies: (1) hypersensitivity to PD materials, including catheter or dialysate; (2) bacteria, fungal or mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Clinical investigations include asymptomatic cloudy PD effluent, fever, abdominal pain and eosinophil count elevate in PD effluent. Eosinophilic peritonitis is usually mild and self-limited. With the development of PD, more eosinophilic peritonitis cases and researches were reported. Here, we report a patient on CAPD with eosinophilic peritonitis. A 71-year-old female patient developed end-stage renal disease for 4 years and underwent CAPD (2 000 mL of 1.5% dialysis solution with four exchanges daily) for 5 months. With a history of unclean food, she was hospitalized for complaints of diarrhea, fever and cloudy peritoneal effluent for 10 days. Dialysis effluent showed an elevated white blood cell (WBC) count of 1 980 cell/mm3, with 60% polymorphonuclear cells. She was diagnosed as PD-related peritonitis, and therapy was initiated with intraperitoneal ceftazidime 1 g once a day and vancomycin 500 mg every other day. She was admitted to the hospital as the symptoms were not relieved. Her peripheral blood cell count showed a total WBC count of 6 940 cells/mm3, 36.8% eosinophil. Her PD effluent analysis showed turbidity, total WBC count of 1 480 cells/mm3, and 83% polymorphonuclear cells. Her dialysate bacteria culture, fungus culture, polymerase chain reaction for Mycobacterium tuberculosis (TB-PCR), acid-fast stain were all negative. On admission day 4, the treatments were changed to levofloxacin 200 mg once a day and vancomycin 500 mg every other day. After two weeks of antibiotics treatment, patient's symptoms were not completely improved and her dialysis effluent remained cloudy. Her blood eosinophil count elevated to 36.8%，eosinophil proportion in PD effluent>90% and PD effluent pathological findings showed eosinophil>90%. Eosinophilic peritonitis was diagnosed and a decision was made to give loratadine daily dose of 10 mg orally. The possible reasons might be the patient's allergy to some components of PD solution or connection systems in the beginning of PD, and this bacterial peritonitis episode, as well as the application of vancomycin, might lead to the fact that eosinophilic peritonitis acutely developed. For there was no improvement in clinical symptoms, loratadine was stopped, and the patient was discharged 18 days later, and received follow-up closely. Two months later, eosinophil count in blood and PD fluid decreased to normal range with no symptom. This case reminds us that in any PD-related peritonitis patient with prolonged symptoms after appropriate antibiotic therapy, and typical clinical symptoms, the diagnosis of eosinophilic peritonitis should be considered. For the count and percentage of eosinophils are not routinely reported in most laboratories, doctors need to contact the department of laboratory and the department of pathology, to confirm the cell count and proportion of eosinophils in dialysis effluent, so as to make the definite diagnosis, which can not only avoid antibiotics overuse, but also avoid antibiotics-induced eosinophilic peritonitis (such as vancomycin).

103 Background: The clinical benefit and safety profile of apatinib in advanced gastric cancer have been established in the randomised controlled phase III clinical trial (J Clin Oncol. 34(13):1448-54). A post-marketing study to confirm the safety and efficacy of apatinib is ongoing in a broad range of patients (pts). Methods: This is a single-arm, open-label, multi-center, Phase IV trial with the target sample size of 2000+ (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02426034). Pts were recruited to receive oral apatinib until disease progression, death or unacceptable toxicity. The primary objective was safety, and the secondary objectives included overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: Herein, we report the preliminary data as documented in the EDC System. As of Jul 10, 2017, 1037 pts were enrolled from 138 hospitals across China. Pts characteristics were: median age 59 yrs, male/female 72.0/28.0%, ECOG PS 0/1/≥2 16.6/66.2/17.2%, stage IV 91.0%. 336 (32.4%) pts interrupted treatment and dose modification occurred in 172 (16.6%) pts (reduction 132/12.7%; rise 87/8.4%). Eventually, the mean dosage was 526.2 mg/d. 652 (62.9%) pts had 4407 drug-related adverse events (DRAEs). Grade ≥3 DRAEs occurred in 300 (28.9%) pts. Severe AEs were reported by 221 (21.3%) pts. The most common DRAEs were proteinuria (19.3%), hypertension (18.8%), leukocyte decrease (16.4%), fatigue (14.2%), platelet decrease (13.6%), hand-foot-skin reaction (11.1%) and neutrophil decrease (10.1%). 820 pts were evaluable for efficacy analysis. The best ORR and DCR were 10.7% and 70.0%, respectively. The median PFS and OS were 4.60 (95%CI, 3.25–4.73) and 6.57 (95%CI, 5.78–7.59) months, respectively. Conclusions: Apatinib monotherapy is effective and has a favorable toxicity profile in real-world clinical setting. The preliminary results of this Phase IV study confirmed the safety and efficacy of apatinib demonstrated in the Phase II and III trials. Updated results will be discussed. Clinical trial information: NCT02426034.

36 Background: Intestinal and diffuse gastric cancer are main histological types of gastric cancer, based on Lauren’s classification, which account for 34–47% and 46–57%, respectively. Patients (pts) with intestinal gastric cancer have better prognosis. The present study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of apatinib between the two intestinal gastric cancer, based on data from post-marketing Phase IV study (Ahead-G201). Methods: The single-arm, open-label, multi-center, Phase IV trial enrolled advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of stomach or gastroesophageal junction after failure of ≥2 lines of chemotherapy. Data of pts with intestinal and diffuse gastric cancer were collected and compared. Results: As of 2017/7/10, 96 intestinal and 104 diffuse pts were recruited. Differences in age (64 vs. 55 yrs), gender (male: 77.1% vs. 57.7%) and disease duration ( > 12 months: 71.3% vs. 56.7%) were detected. Between intestinal and diffuse gastric cancer, there was no discrepancy in incidences of adverse events (AEs) (78.1% vs. 73.1%) and Grade ≥3 AEs (41.7% vs. 38.5%). The incidences of typical AEs associated anti-angiogenesis drugs were also comparable (hypertension 26.0% vs. 16.4%; proteinuria 14.6% vs. 20.2%; hand-foot-skin reaction 16.7% vs. 9.6%). No statistical difference was observed in best overall response rate (12.8% vs. 14.3%) and disease control rate (76.0% vs. 64.3%). Survival benefit in pts with intestinal gastric cancer was detected (progression free survival: 5.52 vs. 2.76 months, p = 0.036; overall survival: 8.11 vs. 4.70 months, p = 0.047). However, the multivariable Cox regression model analysis showed that histological type was not independently prognostic factors for survival, indicating that clinical benefit of pts with intestinal gastric cancer was influenced by other factors. Conclusions: Compared with diffuse gastric cancer, pts intestinal gastric cancer have more clinical benefit after treated by apatinib. However, histological type based on the Lauren’s classification was not independently prognostic factors for survival, which needs to be further analyzed, considering the small sample size. Clinical trial information: NCT02426034.