In recent years, China's new round of institution reform has further optimized the drug regulatory system. Relevant departments and institutions involved in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) regulation have been strengthened. TCM regulatory science, as an emerging interdisciplinary field, has received high regard and experienced rapid development, significantly enhancing TCM regulatory capabilities. Simultaneously, accelerated progress in emerging technologies and production innovation for TCM drug discovery, coupled with the implementation of the National Major Scientific and Technological Special Project for ''Significant New Drugs Development'' and its translational achievements, have led to a historic turning point in the development of innovative natural TCM drugs over the past five years. Driven by the dual engines of ''regulatory science'' and ''policy restructuring'', the development of new TCM drugs has entered a fast lane. Both the quantity and quality of investigational new drug (IND) and new drug application (NDA) registrations and approvals for new natural TCM drugs have shown rapid growth, effectively meeting the public's health demands for TCM products and unmet clinical needs of patients. This study focuses on the development of new TCM drugs during the significant historical phase from 2021 to 2025. It provides a comprehensive overview of new TCM and natural drug applications and regulatory reviews over the past five years, delves into the implementation of the National Drug Regulatory Science Action Plan, and highlights the importance of TCM regulatory science as an emerging interdisciplinary field in accelerating the creation of new TCM drugs. It systematically summarizes the effects of regulatory policies and regulations, the reform of TCM registration classification, specialized TCM registration provisions, and incentive measures such as the National Major Scientific and Technological Special Project for ''Significant New Drugs Development''. Based on an international perspective, it provides a focused review of recent highlights in TCM new drug development and regulation. This holds significant importance for promoting breakthroughs in TCM new drugs across more disease areas and advancing the international coordination of TCM regulation. The challenge faced in managing the registration of new TCM drugs lies in resolving the conflict between TCM theory and modern drug attributes, while balancing the rapid advancement of traditional medical theory and emerging technologies with the robustness of the drug regulatory framework. In the future, actively advancing research and translation in TCM regulatory science, innovatively establishing benefit-risk assessment systems and standards for new TCM drugs, and accelerating the development of a globally leading regulatory system with Chinese characteristics that aligns with the unique nature of TCM will be particularly crucial for global coordination of TCM regulatory policies, and the modernization and internationalization of TCM.

Background:Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionised antitumour therapy. However, regional differences in ICI labels, including the impact of the review process and supporting trial evidence, remain unclear. Methods:We conducted a serial cross-sectional study to examine trends and differences in indication approvals and associated clinical trials for ICIs across different regulatory agencies. We searched ICI labels approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), European Medicines Agency (EMA) and National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) in Mainland China before 31 December 2022 and assessed the indications and clinical trials in labels. Relative lags of indication approvals were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. The review time and interval between trial completion and indication submission were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Results:We collected 10 ICIs with 90 indications from the FDA, 10 ICIs with 70 indications from EMA and 16 ICIs with 65 indications from NMPA. Relative lags of ICI indication approval in China (median 344.0 (IQR 220.0, 688.0) days) were longer than in the European Union (118.5 (55.0, 189.0) days) (p<0.0001). Both the European Union (243.0 (191.0, 298.0) days) and China (283.0 (248.0, 339.5) days) demonstrated significantly longer review durations for ICI indications than the United States (181.0 (148.8, 191.8) days) (p<0.0001). While indication submissions to NMPA were significantly more delayed than those to the FDA (p<0.001), the former relied more on trial evidence of OS (84.0%) than the latter (58.0%). Conclusion:ICIs approved in the United States, the European Union and mainland China differed in indications, approval time, review duration and evidence base, which may impact access to life-saving treatments. Future studies should investigate the impact of these differences and the underlying reasons beyond the evidence supporting the label approvals.

Signal detection is a critical task in drug safety regulation. However, it inevitably generates irrelevant or false signals, posing challenges for resource allocation by marketing authorization holders. To reasonably assess these signals, different countries have established various principles for prioritizing the evaluation of risk signals. This study systematically compares these principles and finds that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration(FDA) focuses on practical issues, such as identifying drug confusion or drug interactions. However, China's Good Pharmacovigilance Practices and the European Medicines Agency(EMA) emphasize a comprehensive evaluation framework. The Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences(CIOMS) emphasizes the consistency of multiple data sources, highlighting the reliability of signal evaluation. China practices a multidisciplinary approach combining traditional Chinese and western medicine, and the risk signals related to traditional Chinese medicine(TCM) have unique characteristics, including complex components, cumulative toxicity, specific theoretical foundations, and drug interactions. The different priorities in risk signal evaluation principles across countries suggest that China should strengthen clinical trial research, emphasize corroboration with evidence of multiple sources, and pay particular attention to the risks of drug interactions in the TCM regulatory science. Establishing the risk signal prioritization principles that align with the characteristics of TCM enables more precise and efficient scientific regulation of TCM.

Objective:Differences between randomized controlled trial (RCT) results and real world study (RWS) results may not represent a true efficacy-effectiveness gap because efficacy-effectiveness gap estimates may be biased when RWS and RCT differ significantly in study design or when there is bias in RWS result estimation. Secondly, when there is an efficacy- effectiveness gap, it should not treat every patient the same way but assess the real-world factors influencing the intervention's effectiveness and identify the subgroup likely to achieve the desired effect.Methods:Six databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang Data, and VIP) were searched up to 31 st December 2022 with detailed search strategies. A scoping review method was used to integrate and qualitatively describe the included literature inductively. Results:Ten articles were included to discuss how to use the RCT research protocol as a template to develop the corresponding RWS research protocol. Moreover, based on correctly estimating the efficacy-effectiveness gap, evaluate the intervention effect in the patient subgroup to confirm the subgroup that can achieve the expected benefit-risk ratio to bridge the efficacy-effectiveness gap.Conclusion:Using real-world data to simulate key features of randomized controlled clinical trial study design can improve the authenticity and effectiveness of study results and bridge the efficacy-effectiveness gap.

ObjectiveThe traditional Chinese patent medicine (TCPM), Simo decoction (Simo decoction oral solution), with its primary ingredient Arecae semen (Binglang, Areca catechu L.), known for its potential carcinogenic effects, is the subject of this study. The research aims to analyze the effectiveness and potential risks of Simo decoction, particularly as a carcinogen, and to suggest a framework for evaluating the risks and benefits of other herbal medicines.MethodsThe study is based on post-marketing research of Simo decoction and Arecae semen. It utilized a wide range of sources, including ancient and modern literature, focusing on the efficacy and safety of Simo decoction. The research includes retrospective data on the sources, varieties, and toxicological studies of Arecae semen from databases such as Pubmed, Clinical Trials, Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WHO-UMC Vigibase, and China National Center for ADR Monitoring.ResultsCommon adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with Simo decoction include skin rash, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and diarrhea. However, no studies exist reporting the severe ADRs, such as carcinogenic effects. Arecae semen is distributed across approximately 60 varieties in tropical Asia and Australia. According to the WHO-UMC Vigibase and the National Adverse Drug Reaction Monitoring System databases, there are currently no reports of toxicity related to Arecae semen in the International System for Classification of ADRs (ISCR) or clinical studies.ConclusionRisk-benefit analysis in TCPM presents more challenges compared to conventional drugs. The development of a practical pharmacovigilance system and risk-benefit analysis framework is crucial for marketing authorization holders, researchers, and regulatory bodies. This approach is vital for scientific supervision and ensuring the safety and efficacy of drug applications, thus protecting public health.

Objective: Randomized controlled trials (RCT) usually have strict implementation criteria. The included subjects' characteristics of the conditions for the intervention implementation are quite different from the actual clinical environment, resulting in discrepancies between the risk-benefit of interventions in actual clinical use and the risk-benefit shown in RCT. Therefore, some methods are needed to enhance the extrapolation of RCT results to evaluate the real effects of drugs in real people and clinical practice settings. Methods: Six databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang Data, and VIP) were searched up to 31st December 2022 with detailed search strategies. A scoping review method was used to integrate and qualitatively describe the included literature inductively. Results: A total of 12 articles were included. Three methods in the included literature focused on: ①improving the design of traditional RCT to increase population representation; ②combining RCT Data with real-world data (RWD) for analysis;③calibrating RCT results according to real-world patient characteristics. Conclusions: Improving the design of RCT to enhance the population representation can improve the extrapolation of the results of RCT. Combining RCT data with RWD can give full play to the advantages of data from different sources; the results of the RCT were calibrated against real-world population characteristics so that the effects of interventions in real-world patient populations can be predicted.

Polygoni Multiflori Radix (He Shou Wu) is a Chinese medicine widely used in clinical treatment and preventive healthcare. However, recently there have been frequent reports of liver injury caused by Polygoni Multiflori Radix and its related preparations, and some patients have serious adverse outcomes, attracting wide attention worldwide. The risk of liver damage caused by preparations containing Polygoni Multiflori Radix or Polygoni Multiflori Caulis has been repeatedly reported by the Chinese Food and Drug Administration. Fortunately, substantial progress has recently been made in revealing the basic properties, main causes, material basis, and molecular mechanism of Polygoni Multiflori Radix-related liver injury. The basic characteristics and biomarkers of susceptible people have been identified, indicating that Polygoni Multiflori Radix has the risk of inducing liver injury only in a few specific populations and is safe for most populations. This study provides a scientific basis for a correct and objective understanding of liver injury caused by Polygoni Multiflori Radix, and a reasonable formulation of safe medication measures for Polygoni Multiflori Radix and related preparations. The China Association of Chinese Medicine organized experts in relevant fields across the country to draft and formulate the “Guidelines for Safe Use of Polygoni Multiflori Radix” with the aim of helping the public and relevant institutions at home and abroad to scientifically understand, evaluate, and avoid the risk of liver injury; guide the rational use; protect the health rights and interests of consumers; and promote the healthy and sustainable development of Polygoni Multiflori Radix and related preparations. These guidelines were issued by the China Association of Chinese Medicine (No. T/CACM 1328-2019).

基于真实世界数据(RWD)产生的真实世界证据(RWE)可以更好地反映药物在实际用药人群中的效果.该文介绍了 RWE研究的产生背景,梳理各国有关提高RWE研究设计规范化与透明度的相关举措,并对目前国际上具有代表性的随机对照试验(RCT)模拟研究进行概述,以期促进国内学者更好地理解RWE的适用范围和应用价值.

Background: There have been individual case reports of aripiprazole in recent years, both domestically and internationally, but no analysis of the characteristics of the occurrence of adverse reactions/events of drug-induced liver injury with aripiprazole using spontaneous reports has been seen. Methods: Using a retrospective study approach, the 452 adverse reaction/event reports of aripiprazole-induced liver injury collected by the China Adverse Drug Reaction Monitoring System from 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2016 were analyzed and evaluated, and exploring it’s the clinical characteristics and related risk factors for liver injury occurrence. Results: Among 452 cases of aripiprazole-induced liver injury ADR/ADE reports, there were 121 cases classified as serious, accounting for 26.8% of the total. There were 250 male and 202 female patients, with a male-to-female ratio of 1.24:1. The age of patients ranged from 11 to 77 years old, with an average age of (34.56 ± 12.81) years old, and a high proportion of young adults in the total population. Some patients had used the drug off-label or at a higher than recommended dosage. The onset of liver injury was generally within 15–90 days after continuous use, while some patients are also accompanied by nausea, vomiting, and weight gain. 70% of the combined drug instructions listed that may cause liver injury. Conclusion: In clinical practice, healthcare professionals should pay closely attention to the adverse reactions and risk factors of liver injury caused by aripiprazole. If there are potential risk factors for liver injury, early and regular monitoring of liver function should be carried out to reduce the occurrence of adverse reactions.

目的 通过介绍国际药品风险最小化评价研究(pharmaceutical risk minimization evaluation studies,RIMES)报告规范(RIMES报告规范)条目并开展实例解读,帮助实施者和读者更好理解并应用RIMES清单工具.方法 总结药品风险最小化项目的特点及研究现状,同时基于翻译完整过程(translation integrity procedure,TIP)经过前向、后向对译等多环节,完成RIMES清单翻译并开展实例解读.结果 梳理RIMES清单所包含的关键信息、研究设计、实施和评价等4个维度共 43个条目.结论 随着全球药物警戒管理机构进一步的推行,RIMES报告规范将为RIMES提供重要的框架指导.

目的 通过对清开灵口服制剂安全性风险的分析,为临床合理用药提供参考.方法 对国家药品不良反应监测系统(2015年1月1日至 2021年12月31日)及国内外文献数据库(建库至 2021年12月31日)中清开灵口服制剂相关不良反应情况、监管机构发布的有关清开灵口服制剂风险控制措施等进行分析.结果 国家药品不良反应监测系统共收到涉及清开灵口服制剂的不良反应/事件报告7 185例,累及胃肠系统、皮肤、神经系统等多个系统-器官;文献报道的清开灵口服制剂不良反应/事件累及系统-器官与国家药品不良反应监测系统中的报告数据基本一致.结论 清开灵口服制剂相关不良反应涉及多个系统-器官,临床应关注清开灵口服制剂相关不良反应,促进安全合理用药.

With the increase in the medical level, the improvement of adverse drug reaction(ADR) monitoring systems, and the enhancement of public awareness of safe medication, drug safety incidents have been frequently reported. Drug-induced liver injury(DILI), especially liver injury attributed to herbal and dietary supplements(HDS), has globally attracted high attention, bringing great threats and severe challenges to the people for drug safety management such as clinical medication and medical supervision. Consensus on drug-induced liver injury had been published by the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences(CIOMS) in 2020. In this consensus, liver injury attributed to HDS was included in a special chapter for the first time. The hot topics, including the definition of HDS-induced liver injury, epidemiological history, potential risk factors, collection of related risk signals, causality assessment, risk prevention, control and management were discussed from a global perspective. Based on the previous works, some experts from China were invited by CIOMS to undertake the compilation of this chapter. Meanwhile, a new causality assessment in DILI based on the integrated evidence chain(iEC) method was widely recognized by experts in China and abroad, and was recommended by this consensus. This paper briefly introduced the main contents, background, and characteristics of the Consensus on drug-induced liver injury. Significantly, a brief interpretation was illustrated to analyze the special highlights of Chapter 8, "Liver injury attributed to HDS", so as to provide practical references for the medical staff and the researchers who worked on either Chinese or Western medicine in China.

目前开展的真实世界研究(real world study,RWS)仍存在诸多局限性,而未能在卫生技术评估方面充分发挥应有的作用.因此,有必要改进传统RWS设计,以产生高质量的医学证据.策略之一是仿照随机对照试验(randomized controlled trial,RCT)开展观察性研究(又称RCT仿真或模拟研究),既借鉴了RCT设计优势,增强了因果推断的强度,又保留了RWS的代表性,可以作为打通药品上市前与上市后证据链的桥梁,以期为医疗决策提供合理的证据支撑.仿照RCT开展观察性研究分为两步:第一步,基于临床问题构建一个目标试验,参照目标试验关键特征构建相应的RWS方案(包括纳排标准、治疗策略、分配程序、随访、结局定义、因果对比和统计分析策略),特别注意减小模拟差异和控制相关偏倚;第二步,使用真实世界数据(real world data,RWD)按照既定研究方案进行数据分析,得到相应结果.

Profound changes have taken place in human disease spectrum, constitution spectrum, and drug use behavior, and the safety of traditional Chinese medicine(TCM) faces new trends and problems. In particular, serious adverse reactions/events such as liver injury and kidney injury caused by non-toxic TCM have been frequently reported, overturning people's understanding of TCM safety, and even shaking the public's confidence in the development of TCM. In the new era of globalization, correctly understanding the situation and problems of TCM safety and addressing the dilemmas in safety evaluation and risk prevention of TCM are the key missions to be undertaken by TCM practitioners. This paper suggests that the situation and problems of TCM safety should be viewed objectively and dialectically, and the use standard of TCM should be advanced with the times. Furthermore, this paper puts forward the new conception and methodology of TCM safety(including one innovative understanding, two types of evaluation modes, tri-elements injury hypothesis; four-quadrant risk decision processes, and five-grade safety evidence body) for the first time, hoping to provide new theories, new strategies, new methods and successful examples for solving the safety problems of TCM.

With the promotion and application of big medical data, non-interventional real-world evidence (RWE) has been used by regulators to assess the effectiveness of medical products. This paper briefly introduces the latest progress and research results of the RCT DUPLICATE Initiative launched by the research team of Harvard University in 2018 and summarizes relevant research experience based on the characteristics of China's medical service to provide inspiration and reference for domestic scholars to conduct related RWE research in the future.

Objective: To describe patterns of utilization of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) in the treatment of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).Methods: Adult patients with COVID-19 who received TCM treatment were divided into a non-serious group (mild and moderate types) and a serious group (severe and critical types) according to their admission conditions. The medical records and prescriptions of these patients were investigated to determine their TCM utilization patterns.Results: In all, 3,872 COVID-19 patients were included. Oral Chinese traditional patent medicine (CPM) was the most commonly used type of TCM, followed by decoction. The proportion of multi-drug combinations was higher than single drug use (55.0% vs. 45.0%). Decoction combined with oral CPM was the most common combination (39.1%, 1,514/3,872). Orally administered, injected, and externally applied CPM were significantly more common in the serious group than in the non-serious, while decoction and non-drug TCM treatments were more common in the non-serious than in the serious group. Multi-drug combinations were used for the majority of patients in both groups, mainly in the form of decoctions combined with oral CPM. Among the serious patients, injected CPM was more often used in patients who died during treatment (35.0%, 36/103). The two most common medication patterns were decoction combined with oral CPM and oral CPM alone in the two finally discharged groups. Oral CPM alone or used in combination with injected CPM were seen most commonly in the death group. Significant differences were established in TCM utilization and medication patterns among patients in three groups who had different prognoses and outcomes.Conclusions: The treatment measures and medication patterns of TCM commonly used in COVID-19 patients with the range of conditions found in this study should be further explored in the future to provide a more complete reference for COVID-19 treatment.

目的 分析2020年版《中国药典》一部中含栀子中成药的不良反应.方法 梳理2020年版《中国药典》一部中含栀子中成药的品种及其临床应用情况,检索中英文文献数据库和国家药品不良反应监测中心药物性肝损伤数据库.结果 2020年版《中国药典》中收录109种含栀子中成药,其中26种存在不良反应,文献报道中频次较高的一般不良反应为胃肠道不适、皮疹等,严重不良反应为过敏性休克(清开灵注射液)、药物性肾损伤(龙胆泻肝丸)等,药物性肝损伤数据库中频次较高的品种为清开灵系列制剂、安宫牛黄丸、安脑丸.总体来看,含栀子中成药不良反应发生率较低,停药后预后良好.栀子用量与不良反应的数量及严重程度无相关性.结论 含栀子中成药及栀子总体安全性较好,但应重点关注清开灵系列制剂、安宫牛黄丸和安脑丸可能导致肝损害及龙胆泻肝丸的肝肾损害情况.

The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has led to the emergence of global health care. In this study, we aimed to explore the association between drug treatments and the incidence of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. A retrospective study was conducted on 5113 COVID-19 patients in Hubei province, among which 395 incurred liver injury. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated by Cox proportional hazards models. The results showed that COVID-19 patients who received antibiotics (HR 1.97, 95% CI: 1.55-2.51, p < 0.001), antifungal agents (HR 3.10, 95% CI: 1.93-4.99, p < 0.001) and corticosteroids (HR 2.31, 95% CI: 1.80-2.96, p < 0.001) had a higher risk of DILI compared to non-users. Special attention was given to the use of parenteral nutrition (HR 1.82, 95% CI: 1.31-2.52, p < 0.001) and enteral nutrition (HR 2.71, 95% CI: 1.98-3.71, p < 0.001), which were the risk factors for liver injury. In conclusion, this study suggests that the development of DILI in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 needs to be closely monitored, and the above-mentioned drug treatments may contribute to the risk of DILI.