Objective To explore the clinical effects of different nursing methods for patients with facial acne scar treated by intensive pulsed light combined with laser. Methods Sixty patients with facial acne scars admitted to our hospital from October 2021 to October 2022 were selected as the research objects. They were divided into control group and study group by random number table method, with 30 patients in each group. Both groups were treated with intensive pulsed light combined with laser. The control group was given routine nursing after operation, and the study group was given comprehensive nursing after operation. The postoperative recovery, psychological state (SAS, SDS) score, quality of life and nursing satisfaction were compared between the two groups. Results The total effective rate of postoperative recovery in the study group (96.67％) was higher than that in the control group (80.00％), and the difference was statistically significant (P ＜0.05). The SAS and SDS scores of the study group were lower than those of the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P ＜0.05). The scores of quality of life in the study group were higher than those in the control group (P ＜0.05). The nursing satisfaction of the study group was better than that of the con trol group, and the difference was statistically significant (P ＜0.05). Conclusion Comprehensive nursing intervention can effectively promote the postoperative recovery of patients with facial acne scar after intensive pulsed light combined with laser treatment, and has a positive effect on improving the quality of life and nursing satisfaction of patients, which is worthy of clinical application.

目的:探讨异维A酸联合盐酸氨酮戊酸光动力治疗中重度痤疮的疗效及对血清炎症因子的影响.方法:收集2018年3月—2020年3月本院门诊收治的中重度痤疮患者102例,随机分为对照组(51例,给予盐酸氨酮戊酸光动力治疗)、观察组(51例,对照组治疗基础上增加异维A酸治疗).治疗4周,观察两组患者的临床疗效并比较治疗前后血清炎症因子水平和不良反应发生率.结果:观察组治疗总有效率高于对照组(P<0.05).治疗后两组C反应蛋白(CRP)、白介素-1β(IL-1β)、肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)水平均降低,且观察组低于对照组(P<0.05).治疗期间两组不良反应发生率对比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论:在盐酸氨酮戊酸光动力治疗基础上予以异维A酸治疗可提升中重度痤疮的疗效,降低机体的炎性因子水平,且不良反应发生率低.

目的:研究对神经性皮炎患者开展护理干预后,对SAS/SDS评分的影响.方法:抽取我院在2018年2月至2019年2月期间收治的88例神经性皮炎患者进行研究,根据护理方式不同,将患者分成两组,对前44例患者实施常规护理措施,并设为常规组,对后44例患者实施系统护理措施干预,并设为研究组,观察两组患者的护理满意度、SAS/SDS评分、住院时间.结果:研究组患者的护理总满意度为(97.7％),对比常规组(81.8％)更高,差异显著(P<0.05);干预前,两组SAS/SDS分数无统计学意义(P>0.05);干预后,研究组SAS、SDS分数明显更低,差异显著(P<0.05);研究组住院时间为(4.87±1.24)d,对比常规组更短,差异显著(P<0.05).结论:对神经性皮炎患者应用系统化护理干预后,效果显著,有效缓解患者的负面情绪,值得推广.