Background: The 2016 reviewed classification of the World Health Organisation (WHO) defines a group of myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN) including the chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), the myelodyplastic syndrome with ring sideroblasts and thrombocytosis (MDS-RS-T) and the MDS/MPN unclassifiable (MDS/MPN-U). The presence of typical clinical characteristics of MDS and MPN hinders the diagnosis and the prognosis of MDS/MPN-U.

Abstract In this prospective trial, the efficacy of azacitidine in lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (LR-SMD) lacking del(5q) was compared to best supportive care (BSC) at 1:1. The primary endpoint was the achievement of erythroid hematologic improvement (HI-E) after nine cycles. Thirty-six patients received at least ≥1 cycle. HI-E was confirmed 44.4% randomized to Aza and in 5.5% of patients receiving BSC (p < .01). After entry in Aza extension period, transfusion independence was achieved in all Aza responders with a median duration of 50 weeks (range: 17–231). No significant differences were observed in secondary endpoints. Importantly, variant allele frequency (VAF) of some mutated genes (RET, SF3B1, ASXL1) decreased after 9 months of treatment in Aza-responder patients. In conclusion, LR-MDS patients lacking del5q and resistant to ESAs, who receive 5 days Aza, achieve TI in a substantial proportion of cases and results in modifications in mutational landscape.

Small-cell gallbladder neuroendocrine carcinoma (GB-SCNEC) is a relatively rare histological type of gallbladder cancer, and the genomic landscape of GB-SCNEC is rarely considered in treatment decisions. We performed whole-genome sequencing on an advanced case of GB-SCNEC. We identified approximately 900 high-quality somatic single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and small insertions and deletions (INDELs), 109 of which were shared by both the primary and metastatic tumor tissues. Somatic non-synonymous coding variations with damaging impact in HMCN1 and CDH10 were observed in both the primary and metastatic tissue specimens. A pathway analysis of the genes mapped to the SNVs and INDELs revealed gene enrichment associated with axon guidance, ERBB signaling et al. Furthermore, we identified 11 deletions, 4 tandem duplications and 5 inversions that mapped to known genes. Two gene fusions, NCAM2-SGCZ and BTG3-CCDC40 were also discovered and validated by Sanger sequencing. Additionally, we identified genome-wide copy number variations and microsatellite instability. In this study, we identified novel biological markers of GB-SCNEC that may serve as valuable prognostic factors or indicators of treatment response in patients with GB-SCNEC with lymphatic metastasis.

Background: The efficacy of erythropoietic-stimulating agents (ESA) in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is unknown. Our objective was to analyze erythroid response (ER) and overall survival (OS) in a series of 94 patients with CMML treated with ESA. Methods: We analyzed a series of 94 patients with CMML treated with ESA included in the Spanish and Dusseldorf-MDS registries. Findings: ER was observed in 64% of patients and red blood cell (RBC) transfusion independence in 31%. The median duration of ER was 7 months (range, 0-88). CPSS and EPO level were significantly associated with ER in multivariate analysis (P = 0.003). Considering only patients with CPSS low-or intermediate-1-risk group, the absence of RBC transfusion dependence and erythropoietin (EPO) level predicted ER (P = 0.003 and P = 0.008, respectively). In multivariate analysis, only the EPO level retained its prognostic value (P = 0.029). Achievement of ER correlated with a better survival since ER evaluation (P = 0.016). Interpretation: The CPSS and EPO levels are adequate tools to select CMML patients with symptomatic anemia who may benefit from treatment with ESA. A significant ER to ESA is expected in anemic patients with low/intermediate-1 CMML risk by the CPSS and a low endogenous serum EPO level.

Background We aimed to compare the ability of recently developed prognostic indices for myelodysplastic syndromes to identify patients with poor prognoses within the lower-risk (low and intermediate-1) categories defined by the International Prognosis Scoring System (IPSS).Methods We included patients with de-novo myelodysplastic syndromes diagnosed between Nov 29, 1972, and Dec 15, 2011, who had low or intermediate-1 IPSS scores and were in the Spanish Registry of Myelodysplastic Syndromes. We reclassified these patients with the new prognostic indices (revised IPSS [IPSS-R], revised WHO-based Prognostic Scoring System [WPSS-R], Lower Risk Scoring System [LRSS], and the Grupo Espanol de Sindromes Mielodisplasicos [Spanish Group of Myelodysplastic Syndromes; GESMD]) and calculated the overall survival of the different risk groups within each prognostic index to identify the groups of patients with overall poor prognoses (defined as an expected overall survival < 30 months). We calculated overall survival with the Kaplan-Meier method.Findings We identified 2373 patients. None of the prognostic indices could be used to identify a population with poor prognoses (median overall survival <30 months) for the patients with low IPSS scores (1290 individuals). In the group with intermediate-1 scores (1083 individuals), between 17% and 47% of patients were identified as having poor prognoses with the new prognostic indices. The LRSS had the best model fit with the lowest value in the Akaike information criteria test, whereas the IPSS-R identified the largest proportion of patients with poor prognoses (47%). Patients with intermediate-1 scores who were classified as having poor prognoses by one or more prognostic index (646 [60%] individuals) had worse median overall survival (33.1 months, 95% CI 28.4-37.9) than did patients who were classified as having low risk by all prognostic indices (63.7 months, 49.5-78.0], HR 1.9, 95% CI 1.6-2.3, p<0.0001)Interpretation Recently proposed prognostic indices for myelodysplastic syndromes can be used to improve identification of patients with poor prognoses in the group of patients with intermediate-1 IPSS scores, who could potentially benefit from a high-risk treatment approach.

Treatment with hypomethylating agents (HMAs) improves overall survival (OS) in patients who achieve a response of stable disease (SD) or better (complete remission [CR], partial remission [PR], or hematologic improvement [HI]). It is not well established if patients who achieve SD at 4–6 months of therapy should be offered different therapies to optimize their response or continue with the same regimen. Clinical data were obtained from the MDS Clinical Research Consortium database. SD was defined as no evidence of progression and without achievement of any other responses. Of 291 patients treated with AZA or DAC, 55% achieved their best response (BR) at 4–6 months. Among patients with SD at 4–6 months, 29 (20%) achieved a better response at a later treatment time point. Younger patients with lower bone marrow blast percentages, and intermediate risk per IPSS-R were more likely to achieve a better response (CR, PR, or HI) after SD at 4–6 months. Patients with SD who subsequently achieved CR had superior OS compared to patients who remained with SD (28.1 vs. 14.4 months, respectively, p = .04). In conclusion, patients treated with HMAs who achieves CR after a SD status had longer survival with continuous treatment after 6 months.

Introduction: WHO classification of MDS is based on cytopenias, dysplasia, percentage of blasts in PB and BM, and cytogenetics. IPSS-R establishes BM blast subgroups (≤2%,2-<5%,5%-10% and >10%) with independent impact in OS. Erythroid hyperplasia (≥50% of total BM cells) is common in MDS. Concerning MDS with expanded erythropoiesis, there is no consensus whether the proportion of BM blasts should be considered on the basis of all nucleated cells (approach-A) or in non-erythroid cells (approach-B).

Introduction: Based on the 2008 World Health Organization classification (WHO 2008), erythroleukemia is defined by the presence of ≥50% erythroid precursors in bone marrow (BM) and ≥20% myeloblasts in the non-erythroid cell population. Multilineage dysplasia is almost always present with high rates of MDS-like cytogenetic abnormalities, specially complex karyotypes. Therefore an extensive comparison with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) with ≥50% erythropoesis seems crucial to elucidate whether erythroleukemia and MDS with erythroid hyperplasia should be considered as different biological entities.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the result of dysregulating mutations within a multipotent myeloid stem/progenitor cell that result in uncontrolled cellular proliferation and differentiation arrest, compromising normal hematopoiesis, and typically manifesting with severe symptomatic pancytopenia. AML is a genetically complex disease with malignant clones most often born of varied chronological acquisition of mutations. Risk stratification and treatment decisions are increasingly informed by our understanding of this genetic framework. Cytogenetic and molecular genetic data are integrated with clinical, laboratory, and histopathologic data to provide more refined diagnostic and prognostic information specific for the individual. As our ability to describe this disease clinically, pathologically, and especially genetically becomes increasingly sophisticated, we expect progress in the development of targeted treatments and improved clinical outcomes.

We show the ability of our flow cytometry-based automated Exvitech© platform to measure depletion of different subsets of CD34+ progenitors and other cell subsets to potentially establish a new assay to screen drug candidates and combinations for hematotoxicity.

BACKGROUND:Multiple myeloma (MM) is a haematological cancer associated with organ damage, essentially bone damage. MM continues to be considered an incurable disease and requires significant therapeutic resources. AIM:This manuscript presents a literature review of the utility of zoledronic acid (zoledronate) in the management of bone disease in MM. DISCUSSION:The clinical benefit of bisphosphonates in the prevention and treatment of bone disease in MM has been demonstrated in the last 10 years. A recent network meta-analysis has evaluated 20 randomised clinical trials with nearly 7000 patients with myeloma enrolled and confirms the role of these agents in the prevention of pain, bone fractures and other skeletal-related events (SRE) in MM. However, their role on survival remains unclear. Zoledronate has shown significant reductions in SRE compared with placebo or other agents with acceptable tolerability, and recent studies have shown antitumoural effects for this agent, with a marginal survival benefit demonstrated in MM. CONCLUSIONS:Zoledronate prevents SRE in MM and presents a marginal survival benefit that deserves further investigation in controlled studies. Current clinical guidelines should be followed regarding the appropriate use of zoledronate in MM, to enhance its effects and to minimise its potential toxicity.

Although new agents have been approved for the treatment of MDS, the only curative approach is allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and thus, in particular circumstances this procedure has been proposed as a treatment option for low risk patients. We have retrospectively analyzed the results of HSCT in 291 patients from the Spanish MDS registry with special attention to low risk MDS (LR-MDS) in order to define the variables that could impact their clinical evolution after transplantation. At 2 years OS was 51% and EFS was 50% (95% CI 0.7-4.5 years for OS and 95% CI 0.1-3.9 years for EFS). Among 43 LR-MDS, transplant-related mortality was 28%. At 3 years, OS was 67% (95% CI 264.7-8927.2 days for OS) and EFS was 64% (95% CI 0-9697.2 days for EFS). In the multivariate analysis only cytogenetics retained statistical significant effect on both OS (p=.047) and EFS (p=.046). Conditioning regimen could improve outcome among this subset of patients (OS 86% and RFS 100% for patients receiving RIC regimen). The present study confirms that specific disease characteristic as well as transplant characteristics have a significant impact on transplant outcome. Regarding low risk patients a non-myeloablative conditioning would be preferable especially in cases without high-risk cytogenetics.

We investigated the effectiveness and tolerability of azacitidine in patients with World Health Organization-defined myelodysplastic syndromes, or acute myeloid leukemia with 20-30% bone marrow blasts. Patients were treated with azacitidine, with one of three dosage regimens: for 5 days (AZA 5); 7 days including a 2-day break (AZA 5-2-2); or 7 days (AZA 7); all 28-day cycles. Overall response rates were 39.4%, 67.9%, and 51.3%, respectively, and median overall survival (OS) durations were 13.2, 19.1, and 14.9 months. Neutropenia was the most common grade 3-4 adverse event. These results suggest better effectiveness-tolerability profiles for 7-day schedules. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

The impact of lenalidomide treatment on long-term outcomes of patients with lower risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and chromosome 5q deletion (del(5q)) is unclear. This study used time-dependent multivariate methodology to analyse the influence of lenalidomide therapy on overall survival (OS) and acute myeloblastic leukaemia (AML) progression in 215 patients with International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) low or intermediate-1 risk and del(5q). There were significant differences in several relevant characteristics at presentation between patients receiving (n = 86) or not receiving lenalidomide (n = 129). The 5-year time-dependent probabilities of OS and progression to AML were 62% and 31% for patients receiving lenalidomide and 42% and 25% for patients not receiving lenalidomide; differences were not statistically significant in multivariate analysis that included all variables independently associated with those outcomes (OS, P = 0·45; risk of AML, P = 0·31, respectively). Achievement of RBC transfusion independency (P = 0·069) or cytogenetic response (P = 0·021) after lenalidomide was associated with longer OS in multivariate analysis. These data clearly show that response to lenalidomide results in a substantial clinical benefit in lower risk MDS patients with del(5q). Lenalidomide treatment does not appear to increase AML risk in this population of patients.

Background and Objectives: Recently, knowledge of the specific genetic markers responsible for cancer malignancies and their associated signaling pathways have generated many new targets that promise to increase drug efficacy while reducing side effects such as hematotoxicity. Although hematotoxicity is widely assumed to be the result of depleting hematopoietic progenitors, in particular myeloid progenitors, there are no assays to test new compounds in bone marrow samples to investigate this effect. Because these effects are patient-specific, an assay that identifies those patients risk of severe hematotoxicity by certain treatments could help personalizing patient treatment. Here, we show the ability of our flow cytometry-based automated Exvitech© platform to measure depletion analysis of different subsets of CD34+ progenitors and other cell subsets to potentially establish a new assay to screen drug candidates and combinations for hematotoxicity, as well as personalizing therapy to the individual sensitive patient at risk. So that in multiple myeloma (MM) we can identify at the same time CD34+ cells and pathological plasma cells; we could actually measure depletion of both malignant cells and progenitor cells on the same patient sample.

Scoring systems for lower-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (LR-MDS) recognize patients with a poorer than expected outcome. This study retrospectively analyzes the role of azacitidine in LR-MDS with adverse risk score and compared to an historical cohort treated with best supportive care or erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. Overall response to AZA was 40%. One and 2-year probabilities of survival were 62% and 45% for AZA vs. 25% and 11% (P = 10−4). In a multivariable time-dependent analysis, response to AZA (CR/PR/HI) was associated with an improved survival (HR = 0.234, 95% CI, 0.063–0.0863; P = 0.029). Thrombocytopenia (<50 × 109 L−1) is confirmed as an adverse parameter in LR-MDS (HR = 1.649, 95% CI, 1.012–2.687; P = 0.045).