BackgroundThe proportion (and even the reality) of peptic ulcer disease (PUD) not related to H. pylori or NSAID/aspirin is debated.AimTo analyse the current epidemiological and clinical characteristics of peptic ulcer disease in French general hospitals.MethodsProspective multicentre study of patients with peptic ulcer disease in 32 French general hospitals over 1year. H. pylori status was assessed by histology, and/or serology and/or C13-urea breath test. NSAID/aspirin intake (obtained by direct interview) and data about concomitant diseases were collected on the day of endoscopy.ResultsNine hundred and thirty-three patients were selected during the year 2009. After exclusion of 118 patients with only erosive duodenitis, 24 with major missing data, 13 with other causes of ulcer and 65 negative for H. pylori by only one test, 713 patients were classified into four groups: 285 (40.0%) had only H. pylori infection; 133 (18.7%) only gastrotoxic drugs; 141 (19.8%) had both and 154 (21.6%) neither H. pylori infection nor gastrotoxic drug intake (idiopathic ulcers'). Patients with idiopathic ulcers differed in many ways both from H. pylori and NSAID/aspirin groups. However, multivariate analysis identified only three independent predictors: age, French metropolitan origin and the presence of comorbidities.ConclusionIn a general hospital-based population in France, peptic ulcer disease appears idiopathic in a fifth of cases.

The eradication rate of H. pylori after an initial course of antibiotic treatment is only 70%. It is therefore essential to inform patients from the onset that a follow-up verification of eradication will be needed 4 to 6 weeks after the first course of treatment and a second or even a third course may be required. After two treatment failures, antibiotic treatment should be adapted to the specific bacterial sensitivity, which necessitates endoscopy with biopsy and culture. The recent increase in bacterial resistance to clarithromycin will probably lead to modifications in the French guidelines within the next 2 years. Recognition of the carcinogenic role of H. pylori has increased the indications for bacterial eradication.

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication treatment should always be thought of as a package which includes first and second line therapies together. So, testing of H. pylori eradication following first line treatment should always be performed and should be explained to the patient with the prescription of the triple therapy. For confirmation of H. pylori eradication both the urea breath test and the biopsy based test (when endoscopy is clinically indicated) are recommended. Stool antigen test is also an accurate test although it seems to have a lower diagnostic value after eradication treatment. Testing should be performed at least of 4 weeks after treatment. Serology with pre and 6 months post treatment samples is usually not recommended except in the case of H. pylori eradication campaign in populations at high risk for stomach cancer for instance.

Aim : To compare the efficacy of different regimens in patients in whom previous Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy has failed. Methods : In this study named StratHegy patients ( n  = 287) were randomized to receive one of three empirical triple therapy regimens or a strategy based on antibiotic susceptibility. The empirical regimens were omeprazole, 20 mg b.d., plus amoxicillin, 1000 mg b.d., and clarithromycin, 500 mg b.d., for 7 days (OAC 7 ), clarithromycin, 500 mg b.d., for 14 days (OAC 14 ) or metronidazole, 500 mg b.d., for 14 days (OAM 14 ). In the susceptibility-based strategy, patients with clarithromycin-susceptible strains received OAC 14 , whilst the others received OAM 14 . The 13 C-urea breath test was performed before randomization and 4–5 weeks after eradication therapy. Results : In the intention-to-treat analysis, the eradication rates for empirical therapies were as follows: OAC 7 , 47.4% (27/57); OAC 14 , 34.5% (20/58); OAM 14 , 63.2% (36/57); it was 74.3% (84/113) for the susceptibility-based treatment ( P  < 0.01 when compared with OAC 7 and OAC 14 ). In patients receiving clarithromycin, the eradication rates were 80% for clarithromycin-susceptible strains and 16% for clarithromycin-resistant strains; in patients receiving OAM 14 , the eradication rates were 81% for metronidazole-susceptible strains and 59% for metronidazole-resistant strains. Conclusions : Eradication rates of approximately 75% can be achieved with second-line triple therapy based on antibiotic susceptibility testing. If susceptibility testing is not available, OAM 14 is an appropriate alternative.

A 63-year-old man with genetic haemochromatosis underwent resection of a cholangiocarcinoma that developed in von Meyenburg complexes; the liver was not cirrhotic. Patients with an association of genetic haemochromatosis and von Meyenburg complexes might have a predisposition to cholangiocarcinoma, even before cirrhosis occurs. Patients with this association should undergo regular and early hepatic surveillance of hemochromatosis.

A patient with previous left caudal pancreatectomy and splenectomy presented with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. Abdominal CT and endoscopic ultrasonography revealed a mass in the splenic area. Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy showed a nodular increase of the uptake corresponding to the lesion detected with conventional imaging. A second laparotomy was performed and the mass was resected. Histological analysis showed that the nodular lesion was an accessory spleen. Since physiologic uptake of 111In-pentetreotide is seen in the spleen, an accessory spleen mimicking a tumor, specially after previous splenectomy, may result in false-positive somatostatin receptor scintigraphy.

We report the case of a duodenal varix rupture in a 37-year-old man revealing an alcoholic cirrhosis. Endoscopic diagnosis of this duodenal varix was difficult because of its atypical and changing appearance. Endoscopic sclerotherapy was completely successful and there was no recurrent bleeding. Although duodenal varix is rare, this case and the literature emphasize the importance of considering this diagnosis in all patients with duodenal tumoral lesions and suspected portal hypertension. In this context, duodenal biopsy can be dangerous and should be avoided. In case of duodenal varix rupture, endoscopic sclerotherapy appears to be a safe and efficient first-choice therapy.