Abstract Funding Acknowledgements None. Background Acute kidney injury (AKI) is one of the most common complications in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS), proving the strict relationship between heart and kidney (the so-called cardio-renal syndrome). AKI is a marker of shock severity, but also independently associated with worse outcomes. Purpose Many data are available on the prevalence of AKI in acute heart failure, but very few studies assessed the role of AKI in CS and they were mainly focused on acute myocardial infarction (AMI)-related CS. Aim of our study was to analyze the impact of AKI on acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF)-CS. Methods Between March 2020 and August 2022, we prospectively enrolled 375 CS patients from a Cardiac Intensive Care Units Network of 12 centers. Among these patients 121 (33.9% of the whole cohort) with ADHF-CS were included for the present analysis. AKI was defined according to KDIGO 2012 criteria as serum creatinine increase ≥ 0.3 mg/dl or 1.5 times compared to admission value, or urinary output < 0.5 ml/kg/h. Results Table 1 shows the baseline characteristics of the cohort. Patients with AKI were older (70 years old [55.5; 76] vs 61 [54; 69], p<0.05), had more comorbidities and a worse CS profile on admission. On multivariable analysis, SCAI stage D-E on admission was independently associated with a higher risk of AKI 24 hours after admission (OR 5.54 and p = 0.01). Treatment with mechanical circulatory support did not prevent AKI (OR 0.84 and p = 0.8). Notably, patients with a greater reduction in central venous pressure (CVP) 24 hours after admission had a lower risk of AKI (deltaCVP in AKI group 0 [-3;0] versus deltaCVP in no-AKI group -3 [-6;0], p = 0.025). Kaplan-Meier curves showed significantly worse survival in patients with AKI (Figure 1A). Cox regression analysis confirmed an association between AKI and increased risk of death (HR 2.14, CI 95% 1.16-3.96, p = 0.01). Notably, this association was even more pronounced in patients with SCAI stages A-B-C (HR 2.81, CI 95% 1.30-6.09, p = 0.01). Finally, in patients treated with renal replacement therapy (RRT) there was no association with lower survival at 180-days follow up (Figure 1B). Conclusions Our study confirms that AKI is a predictor of adverse outcomes in patients with ADHF-CS. Effective decongestion 24 hours after admission was associated with a lower risk of AKI. Considering that AKI had a negative impact even at lower SCAI stages, our findings underscore the importance of early identification of renal injury to promptly target decongestion with pharmacologic therapy and, ultimately, early use of RRT.

Abstract Background The Altshock-2 randomized trial is currently enrolling patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF)-related cardiogenic shock (CS), randomizing them to early intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) or standard of care. Concomitantly, the prospective observational Altshock-2 registry is collecting data on consecutive patients with CS. Due to the recent changes in the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) shock stages and their value in ADHF scenario, inclusion and exclusion criteria of the trial have been modified in a dedicated protocol amendment (January 31st, 2023). How this change could impact on patients’ enrollment in the trial is unknown. Purpose To identify patients enrolled in the Altshock-2 registry who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the Altshock-2 trial, applying original and new criteria (i.e. before and after protocol amendment). Methods Among the 354 patients with CS enrolled in the Altshock-2 registry up to August 31st, 2022, 121 patients (34.2%) with ADHF-CS were considered for the present analysis and evaluated for potential enrollment in the Altshock-2 trial according to old and new inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results Application of the original inclusion criteria of the Altshock-2 trial selected 51 patients (42.1%) potentially eligible for inclusion in the trial (i.e. age ≤75, hypotension or need of vasoactive drugs, pre-existing diagnosis of heart failure with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%, at least one criterion of overt hypoperfusion). The subsequent application of the original exclusion criteria resulted in 29 patients (24.0%) who did not meet exclusion criteria and were therefore eligible for enrollment in the trial. Detailed reasons for inclusion and exclusion are reported in Figure 1. Application of new inclusion criteria selected 61 patients (50.4%) potentially eligible for inclusion in the trial (i.e. age ≤75, need of vasoactive drugs, left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%, SCAI class B-D according to the updated 2022 CS Working Group definition). Subsequent application of the new exclusion criteria resulted in 58 patients (47.9%) who did not meet exclusion criteria and were therefore eligible for enrollment in the trial. Detailed reasons for inclusion and exclusion are reported in Figure 2. Conclusions Among 121 patients with ADHF-CS enrolled in the Altshock-2 registry, application of the original inclusion and exclusion criteria of the Altshock-2 trial identified a subset of 29 patients (24%) who could be suitable for enrollment in the trial. Application of the new inclusion and exclusion criteria selected a higher proportion of patients (58 patients, 47.9%) potentially suitable for enrollment in the trial. These data highlight the challenge of performing randomized trials in ADHF-CS as the timely identification of patients is yet a major issue, despite admission to centers who are actively participating in clinical research.

AIM:To investigate the very long-term clinical outcomes of atrial septal defect (ASD) percutaneous closure in adult patients and to evaluate the 12-month effects of the device on aortic and mitral valve function.METHODS:Over a 12-year period, a total of 110 consecutive patients underwent percutaneous ASD closure. A yearly clinical follow-up was conducted and any adverse event was recorded. In a 55-patient echocardiographic subgroup, the baseline and 12-month aortic and mitral regurgitation rate was recorded.RESULTS:Mean age was 50.9 ± 17 years and 75% of patients were female. Mean ASD echocardiographic dimension was 17.6 ± 6.2 mm (range, 5-36 mm). Procedural success rate was 97%. After a mean follow-up of 61.8 ± 34.9 months (range, 6-167 months), all-cause death occurred in 2 patients (1.8%) and the composite primary outcome of major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) occurred in 5 patients (4.5%): 2 non-device related cardiac deaths occurred and 3 surgeries were required. The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed an event-free survival at 140 months of 90%. In the 12-month echocardiographic substudy, no case of significant (moderate or severe) new-onset aortic regurgitation was detected, while 1 case (1.8%) of worsening mild-to-moderate aortic regurgitation was described (P=.90). No case of significant new-onset or worsening mitral regurgitation was noted. No patient needed aortic or mitral surgical repair at very long-term follow-up.CONCLUSIONS:Transcatheter ASD closure is a safe procedure with satisfactory very long-term clinical outcomes. The ASD device does not significantly affect aortic and mitral valve function.

IMPORTANCEPostpericardiotomy syndrome, postoperative atrial fibrillation (AF), and postoperative effusions may be responsible for increased morbidity and health care costs after cardiac surgery. Postoperative use of colchicine prevented these complications in a single trial.OBJECTIVETo determine the efficacy and safety of perioperative use of oral colchicine in reducing postpericardiotomy syndrome, postoperative AF, and postoperative pericardial or pleural effusions.DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTSInvestigator-initiated, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial among 360 consecutive candidates for cardiac surgery enrolled in 11 Italian centers between March 2012 and March 2014. At enrollment, mean age of the trial participants was 67.5 years (SD, 10.6 years), 69% were men, and 36% had planned valvular surgery. Main exclusion criteria were absence of sinus rhythm at enrollment, cardiac transplantation, and contraindications to colchicine.INTERVENTIONSPatients were randomized to receive placebo (n=180) or colchicine (0.5 mg twice daily in patients ≥70 kg or 0.5 mg once daily in patients <70 kg; n=180) starting between 48 and 72 hours before surgery and continued for 1 month after surgery.MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURESOccurrence of postpericardiotomy syndrome within 3 months; main secondary study end points were postoperative AF and pericardial or pleural effusion.RESULTSThe primary end point of postpericardiotomy syndrome occurred in 35 patients (19.4%) assigned to colchicine and in 53 (29.4%) assigned to placebo (absolute difference, 10.0%; 95% CI, 1.1%-18.7%; number needed to treat = 10). There were no significant differences between the colchicine and placebo groups for the secondary end points of postoperative AF (colchicine, 61 patients [33.9%]; placebo, 75 patients [41.7%]; absolute difference, 7.8%; 95% CI, -2.2% to 17.6%) or postoperative pericardial/pleural effusion (colchicine, 103 patients [57.2%]; placebo, 106 patients [58.9%]; absolute difference, 1.7%; 95% CI, -8.5% to 11.7%), although there was a reduction in postoperative AF in the prespecified on-treatment analysis (placebo, 61/148 patients [41.2%]; colchicine, 38/141 patients [27.0%]; absolute difference, 14.2%; 95% CI, 3.3%-24.7%). Adverse events occurred in 21 patients (11.7%) in the placebo group vs 36 (20.0%) in the colchicine group (absolute difference, 8.3%; 95% CI; 0.76%-15.9%; number needed to harm = 12), but discontinuation rates were similar. No serious adverse events were observed.CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCEAmong patients undergoing cardiac surgery, perioperative use of colchicine compared with placebo reduced the incidence of postpericardiotomy syndrome but not of postoperative AF or postoperative pericardial/pleural effusion. The increased risk of gastrointestinal adverse effects reduced the potential benefits of colchicine in this setting.TRIAL REGISTRATIONclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01552187.

AIMThe aim of this study was to evaluate short- and long-term results of PCI (percutaneous coronary intervention) in patients with small vessel coronary artery disease and the prognostic impact of the extension and the length of coronary lesions.METHODS AND RESULTSAll consecutive patients treated with PCI in our centre between July 2002 and December 2004 were included and divided into two groups according to the diameter of the implanted stents: small vessel disease was defined as requiring implantation of stents < 2.75 mm in diameter. The primary end point was the long-term incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), the composite of cardiac mortality, nonfatal myocardial reinfarction, and repeated percutaneous target vessel revascularization (re-PTCA TVR). 1599 patients were treated by PCI: 419 (26.2%) were implanted with 2.75 mm or smaller stents. At both 1 and 36 months as well as at 53 + 20 months of follow-up small vessel stenting was associated with a higher rate of MACE (4.2% vs 2.1%, P= 0.028; 20.3% vs 17.9%, P <0.001; 27.5% vs 22.4%, P= 0.04, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed higher rates of revascularization for patients with small vessel disease regardless of lesion length. Rates of death were higher in patients with small vessels and long lesions.CONCLUSIONAtherosclerotic involvement of small vessels in patients with CAD confers a higher short- and long-term risk of adverse outcome after PCI.

AIM:Takotsubo cardiomyopathy is a cardiac syndrome characterized by reversible left ventricular dysfunction, ischemic changes on electrocardiogram, elevation of cardiac biomarkers, absence of obstructive coronary artery disease in the setting of various stressing conditions. To date, little is known on best clinical management of this syndrome in coronary care units. Whe thus aimed to present our experience in a real life takotsubo population.METHODS:We identified all patients with Takotsubo cardiomyopathy at our center Maria Vittoria Hospital, Turin, between October 2006 and February 2012. Patients where considered to have Takotsubo syndrome if they presented chest pain on admission, new elettrocardiographic changes suggestive of myocardial ischemia, evidence of apical balloning with hyperkinesis of basal segments on echocardiography, rise in troponin I and, after coronary angiography, no coronary artery disease. We adjudicated the following clinical events: death and recurrence of ischemic events; we also made a detailed analysis of the stressing conditions leading to clinical syndrome.RESULTS:A total of 26 patients were included, 4 (15%) males and 22 (85%) females; mean age was 71±13. After more than 1 year median follow-up the incidence of death was 7.7% (2 deaths), with all deaths, due to cardiogenic shock, occurring in the first 10 days of hospitalization; 2 patients (8%) experienced recurrence of ischemic event. Leading cause of Takostubo was major depressive episode (16%), followed by mourning (12%), falling down with difficulties in standing up (12%), vomiting (8%) and pulmonary infection (8%). In the coronary care unit major complications of patients with Takotsubo syndrome were acute hearth failure (62%), cardiogenic shock (27%), sepsis (31%), pulmonary aedema (27%) and anemia (12%). Two patients needed non-invasive ventilation support and one intra-aortic balloon conterpulasation. In addition one patient developed rabdomyolysis and one left heart thrombus. Cornerstone drug therapy was as follows: 96% of patients took aspirin, 58% beta blockers, 54% nitroglicerine, 46% intravenous heparin, 27% dopamine.CONCLUSION:Takotsubo syndrome is an important safety issue occurring predominantly in post-menopausal women undergoing specific stressing condition. Heart failure and cardiogenic shock are the most serious clinical complication and leading cause of death in the short period, good prognosis is seen thereafter.

We report the first related case of a metastasis from melanoma appeared on a pacemaker device pocket. The stadiation exams showed that this is the only localization of the pathology. The integrated management from both cardiologic and dermatologic surgery was described. It was composed by two interventions, a first time for the implant of a new device contralaterally, and later by the surgical intervention, with exeresis of the lesion, radical lymph node dissection of the axilla and plastic reconstruction. The previous pacemaker implant may hypothetically create a favourable environment for metastatic cells ingrowth. This could be explained by a chronic inflammatory reaction and capsule formation around the device as previously reported, or by a blockage of lymphatic drainage in this specific site.

AIM:Stent thrombosis is a major safety issue after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stent implantation and it is associated with major early and mid-term complications. However, its long-term impact has been incompletely described. We thus aimed to appraise incidence, predictors and very long-term outlook of stent thrombosis after bare metal stent (BMS) or drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation.METHODS:We identified all patients undergoing PCI with BMS or DES at our center between July 2002 and June 2004. For the purpose of this study, we employed a composite definition of stent thrombosis including any Academic Research Consortium stent thromboses (definite, probable, or possible). We adjudicated the following clinical events: death, myocardial infarction (stent thrombosis related), repeated revascularization, and the composite of these events (i.e., major adverse cardiac events, MACE).RESULTS:A total of 1112 patients were included, 854 (76.8%) treated with BMS and 258 (23.2%) treated with DES. At a median follow-up of 61.2 (11.03) months the incidence of stent thrombosis was 20 (1.8%), with 14 (1.3%) definite, 4 (0.4%) probable, and 2 (0.1%) possible according to the American Research Consortium statement. Patients developing stent thrombosis were more likely to have more complex angiographic features at baseline (including angiographically evident thrombus, 4 [20%] vs. 73 [6.6%], P=0.02) and a saphenous vein graft as target vessel (2 [10%] vs. 28 [2.5%], P=0.04). Conversely, being treated with a BMS or a DES did not confer any significant decrease or increase in the risk of stent thrombosis, as 7 [35%] of those with stent thrombosis had received at least a DES vs. 251 [22.9%] of those without stent thrombosis, P=0.28). Early clinical outcomes (at 30 days) distinguishing those with stent thrombosis versus those without were as follows: death in four (20%) vs. 2 (0.2%, P<0.001), myocardial infarction in 1 (5%) vs. 7 (0.6%, P=0.02), revascularization in 5 (25%) vs. 43 (3.9%, P<0.001), and MACE in 8 (40%) vs. 53 (4.8%, P<0.001). After more than 60 months of clinical follow-up, outcomes were as follows: death in 7 (35%) vs. 147 (13.5%, P=0.057), myocardial infarction in 6 (30%) vs. 40 (3.6%, P<0.001), revascularization in 15 (75%) vs. 317 (29%, P<0.001), and MACE in 19 (95%) vs. 453 (41.5%, P<0.001).CONCLUSION:This long-term registry shows that stent thrombosis remains a major safety issue after PCI with stent implantation, with a significant prognostic impact. However, in the present work the risk of stent thrombosis was similar with either DES or BMS, suggesting thus that DES are not associated with any increase in long-term thrombotic risk in comparison to BMS.

AIM Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stent implantation is a well known risk factor leading to an increased rates of stroke, cardiovascular death and myocardial infarction. Anyway there are few data on very-long term outcome (more than 1 year follow up) of PAD after stent implantation. We thus aimed to evaluate the influence of PAD on very long-term outcome of our PCI-population. METHODS We retrospectively identified all patients undergoing PCI with stent implantation at our center between July 2002 and June 2004, and thus eligible for at least 4 years of follow-up. For the purpose of this study, we considered a diagnosis of PAD based on clinical evaluation and/or angiographic documentation. We adjudicated the following clinical events: death, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, and their composite (i.e. major adverse cardiac events, MACE). RESULTS; A total of 1008 patients were included, 109 with PAD and 899 Without PAD. Those with had more often diabetes (35% vs. 25%, P=0.002), hypertension (83% vs. 68%, P=0.001) and unfavorable basal clinical condition at the start of this study: past-Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) (30% vs. 22%, P=0.005), past-Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) (24% vs. 14%, P=0.001), ejection fraction (EF) <35% (14% vs. 7%, P=0.02) and chronic renal failure (CRF) (15% vs. 6%, P=0.002). In addiction patient with PAD were more likely to have chronic total occlusion (CTO) (36% vs. 25%, p=0.02) and unprotected left main (16% vs. 8%,P=0.01). Clinical outcome at the time of follow-up (4,42 ± 1,66 years) was as follow: Revascularization (53% vs. 37%, P=0.002), Cardiac death (21% vs. 13%, P=0.04), MACE (69% vs. 49%, p<.001). Independent predictors of MACE according to our survival analysis were: PAD (HR 1.31; 95% CI 1.01-1.69), Age >75 (HR 1.23; 95% CI 1-1.51), Chronic heart failure (HR1.72; 95% CI 1.19-2.5), Unprotected left main (HR 1.48; 95% CI 1.12-1.96). CONCLUSION This long-term registry shows that PAD remains an important clinical condition that negatively influences the outcome of patients undergoing PCI with stent implantation in a very long-term follow-up period.

Aim. Patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) represent a sizable portion of those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI): in many instances, it is unclear whether performing PCI on the bypass graft or in the native coronary Vessels can offer the best risk-benefit balance.Methods. We included patients with prior CABG undergoing PCI at our center between July 2002 and June 2004 and we distinguished them in three groups. Those in whom PCI was performed on stenotic saphenous vein graft (SVG group), those in whom PCI was performed on native vessels despite the presence of potentially treatable SVG disease (optional native group), and those in whom PCI had to be performed mandatorily in the native vessels because of chronic SVG occlusions or disease in non-bypassed segments (mandatory native group). The primary end-point was long-term rate of major adverse clinical events (MACE, i.e. death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization).Results. We identified 109 patients: 28 were in the SVG group, 25 in the optional native group, and 56 in the mandatory native group. Early major adverse cardiac events (MACE) occurred with similar frequency in the three groups (respectively, 9.1%, 0% and 5.7%, P=0.35). After more than three years of follow-up, MACE occurred in 39.3% vs. 28 and 39.4% (P=0.59), death occurred in 27.2 vs. 24.0% vs. 13.5% (P=0.30), and TVR in 27.3% vs. 8.0% vs. 28.8% (P=0.14).Conclusion. In selected patients, PCI of native coronary vessels despite the presence of apparently treatable SVG lesions can be envisioned.