Tsetse-transmitted trypanosomiasis continues to constrain more than 10 million km2 of high agricultural and livestock farming potential in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Despite its constraints to animal health and production, no accurate national and sub-national level data describing the distribution of tsetse flies has been produced for Uganda. To inform the tsetse fly density (flies/trap/day, or FTD) in Uganda and help advance along the progressive control pathway (PCP) for animal trypanosomiasis, we estimated FTD as an incidence rate across sub-counties in Uganda and explored factors influencing variations in FTD across studies. Tsetse fly publications (n = 2,288) were retrieved for Uganda from five life sciences databases, focusing on studies which inform the spatial distribution of tsetse flies, particularly reporting FTD across the nation. Following PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of 42 publications with the aim of producing an updated map to describe the spatial distribution of tsetse flies from pooled publication data. Current findings highlight substantial spatial data gaps with highly fragmented temporal collection periods. Of the 42 papers evaluated, only 20 reported FTD and were included in meta-analyses. To exhaust insights from extracted data, a zero-inflated multilevel Poisson was built to estimate the spatial distribution of tsetse flies. Meta-regression results found that the interaction of space (i.e. sub-county), time (i.e. collection period) and Glossina species explained the majority (95.93%) of observed FTD variations. Across all records obtained, the western region of Uganda was severely under-sampled. Despite the limitations, like underrepresentation of some regions and declining report of FTD over years, we identified a basis for future research, which should target identifying environmental and climactic predictors of tsetse fly habitats, and we established a solid foundation for the future development of a national-level information system for the vectors of trypanosomiasis (i.e. an 'atlas').
Animal African trypanosomiasis (AAT) poses a significant impediment to livestock production and economic progress in sub-Saharan Africa. To reduce the burden of AAT in Uganda and contribute to the AAT progressive control pathway, there is a need to develop effective AAT and tsetse control measures. In this study, we assessed a combination of chemotherapy and Restricted Insecticide Application Protocol (RAP) as a last mile control option for the progressive control of AAT and acute sleeping sickness in south- eastern Uganda. Cattle from fourteen AAT endemic villages in south-eastern Uganda were treated with two doses of diminazene acecurate 40 days apart and sprayed with deltamethrin once monthly for 6 months following chemotherapy. Both cattle and tsetse flies were screened for trypanosomes before and 6 months into the interventions using ITS1-PCR. Tsetse flies trapped per day per trap were counted and the apparent tsetse fly density [Flies/Trap/Day-FTD] determined and mapped. The effect of chemotherapy and RAP on (1) FTD and (2) trypanosome infection in both cattle and tsetse flies was determined using mixed effects regression models. RAP and chemotherapy were associated with significantly lower odds of trypanosome infections in cattle (OR = 0.43, 95
BackgroundTsetse flies (Glossina sp.) are the primary vectors of trypanosomes causing human African trypanosomiasis (HAT) and animal African trypanosomiasis (AAT). Disease surveillance can be carried out by detecting Trypanosoma DNA in tsetse, also known as molecular xenomonitoring. Whilst molecular methods can increase the efficiency and sensitivity of pathogen detection, trained staff and a well-equipped laboratory are required. In many cases, DNA extraction and screening is outsourced to a central laboratory in a major city either in-country or abroad, far removed from original tsetse collection sites. This increases results turnaround time, incurs transportation costs, and can lead to sample loss or damage.Methodology/principle findingsWe set out to develop, optimise and trial methods for tsetse xenomonitoring in a low-resource point-of-need setting. A low-cost protocol was developed consisting of rapid alkali-based DNA extraction and Trypanosoma detection qPCR assays using air-dryable reagent mixes. A minimally-equipped laboratory was established in a field station in Arua, Uganda. Following a training workshop, three entomology technicians carried out screening on 286 tsetse collected over a nine-week study period. The technicians consistently extracted high quality DNA (98% success rate) and were able to successfully detect T. brucei sensu lato in 4.3% (95% confidence interval (CI) [2.23 - 7.37]), T. congolense in 3.6% (95% CI [1.73 - 6.47]) and T. vivax in 3.9% (95% CI [1.98 - 6.92]) of total tsetse, representing a total Trypanosoma sp detection prevalence of 10.7% (95% CI [9.6 - 11.8]).Conclusions/significanceThis study demonstrated that sensitive molecular xenomonitoring of HAT and AAT pathogens can be carried out without the need for cold-chain storage or high-powered equipment. Further improvements to the system might be achieved by modifying the DNA extraction protocol to enable high-throughput or pooled samples, increasing the sensitivity of the T. b. gambiense DNA detection assay and exploring more sustainable power sources.
Every year, over 700,000 people, particularly children under five, die from vector-borne diseases worldwide. Effectively controlling endemics and preventing new outbreaks requires an integrated approach that can lead to the elimination of both vectors and diseases. In the last two decades, integrating medical interventions and vector control has significantly reduced the incidence of Gambian Human African Trypanosomiasis (g-HAT), with the World Health Organization validating eight countries as having eliminated the disease as a public health problem. However, elimination of the tsetse vector has not been confirmed, leaving the possibility of re-emergence. We developed a six-step modeling framework to assess vector elimination by calculating: i) the probability of vector capture; ii) the probability of observing a series of zero catches, even without actual elimination; iii) the probability of natural elimination; iv) the probability of failing to detect a rebound; v) the reinvasion risk; and vi) the sensitivity analysis. Our case study is g-HAT in Mandoul, Chad, and the elimination of Glossina fuscipes fuscipes. We used vector control from 2014 to 2025 with no tsetse detected since 2018. We cannot yet conclude, with over 90% confidence, that tsetse has been eliminated from Mandoul, nor that any remnant population will be naturally eliminated. However, since vector control stopped in April 2025, we estimate that with continued sampling over the next 2 y, and no tsetse detected, elimination could be demonstrated with 99% confidence. Our multistep modeling framework can be applied to other vectors, providing policymakers with guidelines for ongoing and future efforts.
Gambiense human African trypanosomiasis (gHAT) is a vector-borne disease with hundreds of thousands of people living at risk across Sub-Saharan Africa. Uganda, having reduced gHAT cases reported annually from 948 in 2000 to zero local cases since 2020, is a frontrunner to be verified by the World Health Organization (WHO) as having achieved elimination of transmission (EoT) of gHAT. It is now crucial to quantify the impact of the interventions deployed, quantify whether the last transmission event (LTE) and last case have already occurred, and determine the resources required to sustain the gains. We employed a suite of mechanistic compartmental gHAT models, fitted to data from seven districts (Adjumani, Amuru, Arua, Koboko, Maracha, Moyo, and Yumbe) in Uganda that reported gHAT cases during 2000–2022, to address these questions. By combining and weighting the evidence from each model variant, we captured the uncertainty of achieving different elimination metrics across Uganda. Additionally, we utilised the dynamic transmission model outputs to perform a health economic analysis, identifying the most cost-effective strategies to avert disease burden. Predictions estimate that Uganda had the LTE in or before 2021 with high certainty ( > 95
IntroductionTsetse flies (Glossina) transmitTrypanosoma brucei gambiense, which causes gambiense human African trypanosomiasis (gHAT). As part of national efforts to eliminate gHAT as a public health problem, Uganda implemented a large-scale programme of deploying Tiny Targets, which comprise panels of insecticide-treated material which attract and kill tsetse. At its peak, the programme was the largest tsetse control operation in Africa. Here, we quantify the impact of Tiny Targets and environmental changes on the spatial and temporal patterns of tsetse abundance across North-Western Uganda.MethodsWe leverage a 100-month longitudinal dataset detailingGlossina fuscipes fuscipescatches from monitoring traps between October 2010 and December 2019 within seven districts in North-Western Uganda. We fitted a boosted regression tree (BRT) model assessing environmental suitability, which was used alongside Tiny Target data to fit a spatiotemporal geostatistical model predicting tsetse abundance across our study area (~16 000 km2). We used the spatiotemporal model to quantify the impact of Tiny Targets and environmental changes on the distribution of tsetse, alongside metrics of uncertainty.ResultsEnvironmental suitability across the study area remained relatively constant over time, with suitability being driven largely by elevation and distance to rivers. By performing a counterfactual analysis using the fitted spatiotemporal geostatistical model, we show that deployment of Tiny Targets across an area of 4000 km2reduced the overall abundance of tsetse to low levels (median daily catch=1.1 tsetse/trap, IQR=0.85–1.28). No spatial–temporal locations had high (>10 tsetse/trap/day) numbers of tsetse compared with 18% of locations for the counterfactual.ConclusionsIn Uganda, Tiny Targets reduced the abundance ofG. f. fuscipesand maintained tsetse populations at low levels. Our model represents the first spatiotemporal geostatistical model investigating the effects of a national tsetse control programme. The outputs provide important data for informing next steps for vector control and surveillance.
BACKGROUND:Tsetse flies (Glossina) transmit Trypanosoma brucei gambiense which causes Gambian human African trypanosomiasis (gHAT) in Central and West Africa. Several countries use Tiny Targets, comprising insecticide-treated panels of material which attract and kill tsetse, as part of their national programmes to eliminate gHAT. We studied how the scale and arrangement of target deployment affected the efficacy of control.METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPAL FINDINGS:Between 2012 and 2016, Tiny Targets were deployed biannually along the larger rivers of Arua, Maracha, Koboko and Yumbe districts in North West Uganda with the aim of reducing the abundance of tsetse to interrupt transmission. The extent of these deployments increased from ~250 km2 in 2012 to ~1600 km2 in 2015. The impact of Tiny Targets on tsetse populations was assessed by analysing catches of tsetse from a network of monitoring traps; sub-samples of captured tsetse were dissected to estimate their age and infection status. In addition, the condition of 780 targets (~195/district) was assessed for up to six months after deployment. In each district, mean daily catches of tsetse (G. fuscipes fuscipes) from monitoring traps declined significantly by >80% following the deployment of targets. The reduction was apparent for several kilometres on adjacent lengths of the same river but not in other rivers a kilometre or so away. Expansion of the operational area did not always produce higher levels of suppression or detectable change in the age structure or infection rates of the population, perhaps due to the failure to treat the smaller streams and/or invasion from adjacent untreated areas. The median effective life of a Tiny Target was 61 (41.8-80.2, 95% CI) days.CONCLUSIONS:Scaling-up of tsetse control reduced the population of tsetse by >80% across the intervention area. Even better control might be achievable by tackling invasion of flies from infested areas within and outside the current intervention area. This might involve deploying more targets, especially along smaller rivers, and extending the effective life of Tiny Targets.
Introduction: Trypanosomiasis is a parasitic infection caused by the protozoa Trypanosoma. It is exclusively associated with Glossina species habitats and, therefore, restricted to specific geographical settings. It affects a wide range of hosts, including humans. Animals may carry different Trypanosoma spp. while being asymptomatic. They are, therefore, potentially important in unpremeditated disease transmission. Aim: The aim of this study was to study the potential impact of the government tsetse fly control program, and to elucidate the role of pigs in the Trypanosoma epidemiology in the West Nile region in Uganda. Methods: A historically important human African trypanosomiasis (HAT) hotspot was selected, with sampling in sites with and without a government tsetse fly control program. Pigs were screened for infection with Trypanosoma and tsetse traps were deployed to monitor vector occurrence, followed by tsetse fly dissection and microscopy to establish infection rates with Trypanosoma. Pig blood samples were further analyzed to identify possible Trypanosoma infections using internal transcribed spacer (ITS)-PCR. Results: Using microscopy, Trypanosoma was detected in 0.56% (7/1262) of the sampled pigs. Using ITS-PCR, 114 of 341 (33.4%) pig samples were shown to be Trypanosoma vivax positive. Of the 360 dissected tsetse flies, 13 (3.8%) were positive for Trypanosoma under the microscope. The difference in captured tsetse flies in the government intervention sites in comparison with the control sites was significant (p < 0.05). Seasonality did not play a substantial role in the tsetse fly density (p > 0.05). Conclusion: This study illustrated the impact of a government control program with low vector abundance in a historical HAT hotspot in Uganda. The study could not verify that pigs in the area were carriers for the causative agent for HAT, but showed a high prevalence of the animal infectious agent T. vivax.
Background Riverine species of tsetse ( Glossina ) transmit Trypanosoma brucei gambiense , which causes Gambian human African trypanosomiasis (gHAT), a neglected tropical disease. Uganda aims to eliminate gHAT as a public health problem through detection and treatment of human cases and vector control. The latter is being achieved through the deployment of ‘Tiny Targets’, insecticide-impregnated panels of material which attract and kill tsetse. We analysed the spatial and temporal distribution of cases of gHAT in Uganda during the period 2010–2019 to assess whether Tiny Targets have had an impact on disease incidence. Methods To quantify the deployment of Tiny Targets, we mapped the rivers and their associated watersheds in the intervention area. We then categorised each of these on a scale of 0–3 according to whether Tiny Targets were absent (0), present only in neighbouring watersheds (1), present in the watersheds but not all neighbours (2), or present in the watershed and all neighbours (3). We overlaid all cases that were diagnosed between 2000 and 2020 and assessed whether the probability of finding cases in a watershed changed following the deployment of targets. We also estimated the number of cases averted through tsetse control. Results We found that following the deployment of Tiny Targets in a watershed, there were fewer cases of HAT, with a sampled error probability of 0.007. We estimate that during the intervention period 2012–2019 we should have expected 48 cases (95% confidence intervals = 40–57) compared to the 36 cases observed. The results are robust to a range of sensitivity analyses. Conclusions Tiny Targets have reduced the incidence of gHAT by 25% in north-western Uganda. Graphical abstract
Background Tsetse flies are the major vectors of human trypanosomiasis of the form Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense and T.b.gambiense. They are widely spread across the sub-Saharan Africa and rendering a lot of challenges to both human and animal health. This stresses effective agricultural production and productivity in Africa. Delimiting the extent and magnitude of tsetse coverage has been a challenge over decades due to limited resources and unsatisfactory technology. In a bid to overcome these limitations, this study attempted to explore modelling skills that can be applied to spatially estimate tsetse abundance in the country using limited tsetse data and a set of remote-sensed environmental variables. Methodology Entomological data for the period 2008–2018 as used in the model were obtained from various sources and systematically assembled using a structured protocol. Data harmonisation for the purposes of responsiveness and matching was carried out. The key tool for tsetse trapping was itemized as pyramidal trap in many instances and biconical trap in others. Based on the spatially explicit assembled data, we ran two regression models; standard Poisson and Zero-Inflated Poisson (ZIP), to explore the associations between tsetse abundance in Uganda and several environmental and climatic covariates. The covariate data were constituted largely by satellite sensor data in form of meteorological and vegetation surrogates in association with elevation and land cover data. We finally used the Zero-Inflated Poisson (ZIP) regression model to predict tsetse abundance due to its superiority over the standard Poisson after model fitting and testing using the Vuong Non-Nested statistic. Results A total of 1,187 tsetse sampling points were identified and considered as representative for the country. The model results indicated the significance and level of responsiveness of each covariate in influencing tsetse abundance across the study area. Woodland vegetation, elevation, temperature, rainfall, and dry season normalised difference vegetation index (NDVI) were important in determining tsetse abundance and spatial distribution at varied scales. The resultant prediction map shows scaled tsetse abundance with estimated fitted numbers ranging from 0 to 59 flies per trap per day (FTD). Tsetse abundance was found to be largest at low elevations, in areas of high vegetative activity, in game parks, forests and shrubs during the dry season. There was very limited responsiveness of selected predictors to tsetse abundance during the wet season, matching the known fact that tsetse disperse most significantly during wet season. Conclusions A methodology was advanced to enable compilation of entomological data for 10 years, which supported the generation of tsetse abundance maps for Uganda through modelling. Our findings indicate the spatial distribution of the G. f. fuscipes as; low 0–5 FTD (48%), medium 5.1–35 FTD (18%) and high 35.1–60 FTD (34%) grounded on seasonality. This approach, amidst entomological data shortages due to limited resources and absence of expertise, can be adopted to enable mapping of the vector to provide better decision support towards designing and implementing targeted tsetse and tsetse-transmitted African trypanosomiasis control strategies.
Gambiense human African trypanosomiasis (g-HAT) is the chronic form of sleeping sickness caused by Trypanosoma brucei gambiense in West and Central Africa, while Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense causes an acute form in eastern Africa. g-HAT is targeted for elimination as a public health problem by 2020 and 0 transmission by 2030 [1,2]. Control of g-HAT is largely based on identification and treatment of infected individuals, supplemented by control of the tsetse fly vectors [3]. There has been growing evidence that when both tsetse control and case identification activities are carried out simultaneously in the same geographies, elimination of the disease is accelerated [4–6]. Here, we describe how the Trypa-NO! Partnership is using novel and classical tools to drive g-HAT elimination in an integrated approach, progress made, lessons learnt, and future directions.
Improvements in genetic and genomic technology have enabled field-deployable molecular laboratories and these have been deployed in a variety of epidemics that capture headlines. In this editorial, we highlight the importance of building physical and personnel capacity in low and middle income countries to deploy these technologies to improve diagnostics, understand transmission dynamics and provide feedback to endemic communities on actionable timelines. We describe our experiences with molecular field research on schistosomiasis, trypanosomiasis and rabies and urge the wider tropical medicine community to embrace these methods and help build capacity to benefit communities affected by endemic infectious diseases.
In 1994, combined active and passive screening reported 1469 cases from the historic Gambian Human African Trypanosomiasis (gHAT) foci of West Nile, Uganda. Since 2011 systematic active screening has stopped and there has been reliance on passive screening. During 2014, passive screening alone detected just nine cases. In the same year a tsetse control intervention was expanded to cover the main gHAT foci in West Nile to curtail transmission of gHAT contributing to the elimination of gHAT as a public health problem in the area. It is known that sole reliance on passive screening is slow to detect cases and can underestimate the actual true number. We therefore undertook an active screening programme designed to test the efficacy of these interventions against gHAT transmission and clarify disease status. Screening was conducted in 28 randomly selected villages throughout the study area, aiming to sample all residents. Whole blood from 10,963 participants was analysed using CATT and 97 CATT suspects (0.9%) were evaluated with microscopy and trypanolysis. No confirmed cases were found providing evidence that the gHAT prevention programmes in West Nile have been effective. Results confirm gHAT prevalence in the study area of West Nile is below the elimination threshold (1 new case / 10,000 population), making elimination on course across this study area if status is maintained. The findings of this study can be used to guide future HAT and tsetse management in other gHAT foci, where reduced caseloads necessitate a shift from active to passive screening.
Treatment of sleeping sickness and nagana is threatened by drug resistance. To guide drug use in sleeping sickness control, we set out to determine if cattle-derived drug resistant sleeping sickness causing parasites spill-over to humans as drug resistant; causing sleeping sickness treatment failure. We screened cattle (n= 2,750) and sleeping sickness patients (n=147) from south-eastern Uganda for drug resistant sleeping sickness [T. b. rhodesiense]] and nagana causing parasites [ T. brucei s.l. ] and hence determined their prevalence in either populations using sound statistical means. One in three cattle [949/2,750] was positive for T. brucei s.l. and about 90 of every 100 of these parasites had changes in their genes induced by drug use. More than half of the sleeping sickness patients carried T. b. rhodesiense with changes in their genes induced by drug use and their occurrence was spatially related to those in cattle. Drugs are still effective in both nagana and sleeping sickness control in south-eastern Uganda since the genetic changes in nagana and sleeping sickness causing parasites detected in this study do not reduce drug effectiveness against these parasites. It is very likely that genetic changes in T. b. rhodesiense occur in cattle and are then transmitted to humans.
BACKGROUND:Nagana (African Animal Trypanosomiasis-AAT) and tick-borne diseases (TBDs) constrain livestock production in most parts of sub-Saharan Africa. To this realisation, Uganda government set up an African trypanosomiasis (AT) control unit, which among other activities generates national tsetse control priority maps using apparent tsetse density data. Such maps underestimate mechanically transmitted AAT and thus ought to be refined using actual AT prevalence data. We therefore set out to generate up-to-date cattle and donkey trypanosomiasis prevalence data as well as find out the constraints to livestock production in Karamoja region in a bid to re-define AT control priority in this region.RESULTS:Livestock keepers and animal health workers indicated that TBDs and AAT were the most important livestock diseases in Karamoja region. The prevalence of Trypanosoma spp. in cattle and donkeys was 16.3% (95% CI: 12.4-21.1%) and 32.4% (95% CI; 20.2-47.6%) respectively. Trypanosoma vivax (12.1%) and Trypanosoma congolense savannah (29.6%) were the most prevalent Trypanosoma spp. in cattle and donkeys respectively. Majority of the cattle (85.7%) and more than half of the donkey (57.1%) herds were positive for Trypanosoma spp.CONCLUSIONS:African animal trypanosomiasis and TBDs are the most important constraints to livestock production in Karamoja region. In order to improve livestock production and hence Karamajong livelihoods, government of Uganda and her development partners will need to invest in livestock health programs particularly targeting tsetse and TBD control.
Background: Ticks and tick-borne diseases undermine cattle fitness and productivity in the whole of sub-Saharan Africa, including Nigeria. In this West African country, cattle are challenged by numerous tick species, especially during the wet season. Consequently, several TBDs are known to be endemic in Nigerian cattle, including anaplasmosis, babesiosis, cowdriosis and theilerioris (by Theileria mutans and Theileria velifera). To date, all investigations on cattle TBDs in Nigeria have been based on cytological examinations and/or on serological methods. This study aimed to ascertain the occurrence of tick-borne pathogens of veterinary and zoonotic importance in cattle in Nigeria using molecular approaches.Methods: In October 2008, 704 whole blood samples were collected from indigenous cattle in the Plateau State, Nigeria. Analysis for tick-borne pathogens was conducted by means of PCR-based reverse line blotting (RLB) and sequencing targeting a panel of five genera of microorganisms (i.e. Babesia, Theileria, Anaplasma, Ehrlichia and Rickettsia spp.).Results: In total, 561/704 (82.6 %) animals were found infected, with 465 (69.6 %) of them being infected by two or more microorganisms, with up to 77 possible combinations of pathogens detected. Theileria mutans was the most prevalent microorganism (66.3 %), followed by Theileria velifera (52.4 %), Theileria taurotragi (39.5 %), Anaplasma marginale (39.1 %), Anaplasma sp. (Omatjenne) (34.7 %), Babesia bigemina (7.9 %), Anaplasma centrale (6.3 %), Anaplasma platys (3.9 %), Rickettsia massiliae (3.5 %), Babesia bovis (2.0 %) and Ehrlichia ruminantium (1.1 %). Calves were found significantly less infected than juvenile and adult cattle.Conclusions: This study provides updated, molecular-based information on cattle TBDs in Nigeria. The molecular approach employed allowed the diagnosis of numerous positive cases including carrier statuses, multiple infections and novel pathogen detections within the indigenous cattle population. Moreover, the RLB method here described enabled the detection of veterinary agents not only pertaining to bovine health, including also those of zoonotic importance.The high prevalence recorded for T. mutans, T. velifera, A. marginale, T. taurotragi and Anaplasma sp. (Omatjenne), suggests they may be endemically established in Nigeria, whereas the lower prevalence recorded for other microorganisms (i.e. A. centrale and B. bovis) highlights a less stable epidemiological scenario, requiring further investigations.