BACKGROUND AND AIMS:Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) is increasingly used for refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT), yet prospective multicentre outcome data remain limited. Here, the planned interim analysis of the prospective Standardized Treatment and Outcome Platform for Stereotactic Therapy Of Re-entrant tachycardia by a Multidisciplinary (STOPSTORM) registry is reported. METHODS:STOPSTORM is a European prospective, international, multicentre registry of patients treated with STAR. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in sustained VT episode burden comparing the 6 months before versus the 6 months after STAR. The primary safety endpoint was the occurrence of serious adverse events (SAEs) adjudicated as possibly or probably treatment-related. Overall survival was assessed using time-to-event methods. RESULTS:Across 28 centres, 193 patients were included (mean age 68±9 years; 88% male; 53% non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy). Median follow-up was 19 months. Among 107 evaluable patients with ≥6-month follow-up, the median VT episode burden was reduced by 80% after STAR. Among patients surviving ≥6 months, 72% were free from implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shock. In the full cohort, 12 SAEs were adjudicated as possibly or probably treatment-related, including pericardial effusion, coronary events, and early post-treatment ventricular arrhythmia. Overall survival probability was 77% at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS:In the largest prospective multicentre cohort reported to date, STAR was associated with a substantial reduction in VT burden and ICD shocks, with a low frequency of possibly or probably treatment-related SAEs.

BACKGROUND:Pathological fibrosis is a major finding in cardiovascular diseases and can result in arrhythmia and heart failure. Desmosome gene mutations can lead to arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy. Among arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathies, pathogenic DSP (desmoplakin) variants cause a distinctive cardiomyopathy with excessive cardiac fibrosis that could precede ventricular dysfunction. DSP variants are also linked to other fibrotic diseases. Whether DSP plays any role in pathological fibrosis remains unknown. METHODS:Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) are resident fibroblast-like cells that are responsible for fibrogenesis in most organs, including the heart. We first used RNA-seq genome-wide analyses to generate cardiac fibroblast-like, induced pluripotent stem cell-derived MSCs from normal donors and patients with arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy with DSP mutations. We then studied the fibrogenic responses of cardiac MSCs to TGFβ1 (transforming growth factor β1) using Western/Co-IP, autophagy assays, gene knockdowns/over-expressions, genomic analyses, mouse DSP knockdown models, immunostaining, and qPCR. RESULTS:TGFβ1 induced excessive accumulation of VIM (vimentin)/fibrillar collagens and over-activated fibrotic genes in DSP-mutant MSCs when compared with normal MSCs. In normal MSCs, VIMs bind to wild-type DSP during normal fibrogenesis after TGFβ1. DSP-mutant MSCs exhibited a haplo-insufficient phenotype with increased DSP-unbound VIMs that sequestered BECN1 (beclin-1) from activating autophagy and CAV1 (caveolin-1)-mediated endocytosis. Decreased autophagy caused collagen accumulation, and diminished CAV1 endocytosis resulted in abnormal CAV1 plaque formation that over-activated fibrotic genes (COL1A1, COL3A1, and fibronectin [FN]) via heightened p38 activity after TGFβ1. Genome-wide analysis and DSP knockdown in mouse fibroblasts confirmed this novel role of DSP mutations in pathological fibrosis. Overexpression of VIM-binding domains of DSP could suppress pathological fibrosis by increasing collagen autophagic degradation and decreasing fibrotic gene expression. CONCLUSIONS:Our data reveal that DSP deficiency in MSCs/fibroblasts leads to exaggerated fibrogenesis in DSP-cardiomyopathy by decreasing BECN1 availability for autophagy and CAV1-endocytosis. Overexpression of VIM binding domains of DSP could be a new strategy to treat pathological fibrosis.

Ventricular electrical storm (ES) significantly increases the risks of heart failure-related morbidity, mortality, and the need for heart transplantation(1). Standard treatment options include antiarrhythmic drugs and catheter ablation. The autonomic nervous system plays a role in arrhythmogenesis, and autonomic modulation techniques, such as stellate ganglion blockade (SGB), have shown promise in drug-refractory ES. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SGB in patients with drug-refractory ventricular arrhythmias or ES. We conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and Scopus databases to identify trials using SGB in ES patients, following PRISMA guidelines. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients fre from ventricular arrhythmias (VA) at 24 and 72 hours post-SGB; the secondary outcome was the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of VA episodes before and after SGB. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed using the "metaprop" and "metagen" packages in R. Out of 932 screened articles, 9 studies with 418 patients met the inclusion criteria (2-10). Th e mean age was 63.6 ± 12.3 years, 84.4% were male, with a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 27.4 ± 11.3%, and 56.9% had ischemic cardiomyopathy. Pharmacological SGB was performed in 8 studies, with one study using transcutaneous magnetic stimulation. The pooled proportion of VA-free patients was 75% (95% CI 62% - 84%) at 24 hours and 59% (95% CI 45% - 72%) at 72 hours (Figure 1). The incidence of VA episodes decreased from 15.64 to 0.62 episodes per 24 hours, with an IRR of 0.067, indicating a 93.7% reduction in the incidence rate of VA episodes post-intervention (Figure 2). No serious adverse events were reported; in-hospital mortality was 27.3%. SGB is an effective and safe intervention for stabilizing patients with drug-refractory VA, with substantial VA suppression at 72 hours and a 94% reduction in episodes. This minimally invasive, accessible technique may be considered after failure of antiarrhythmic treatment, ablation, or even mechanical circulatory support. Further randomized trials are warranted to confirm these findings.

BackgroundCardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is a chronic inflammatory disease characterised by non-caseating granulomas, while arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM) is a genetic condition mainly affecting desmosomal proteins. The coexistence of CS and genetic variants associated with ACM is not well understood, creating challenges in diagnosis and management. This study aimed to describe the clinical, imaging and genetic features of patients with both conditions.MethodsThis was a multicentre retrospective case-control study involving three groups of patients: those with biopsy-proven CS and pathogenic or likely pathogenic genetic variants linked to ACM (n=5); patients with genetic variants but no CS (n=5); and patients with CS without genetic variants (n=5). Clinical data, including symptoms, electrocardiographic findings and imaging results from echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance and positron-emission tomography, were analysed.ResultsPatients with CS and genetic variants were more likely to exhibit atrioventricular block (100%), PR prolongation (204 ms vs 160 ms) and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (80%) compared with those with genetic variants alone (0% for both). Imaging findings showed a higher prevalence of septal involvement in patients with both conditions (80%) than in those with genetic variants alone (20%). No significant differences were observed between patients with CS and genetic variants and those with CS without genetic variants. The genetic variants identified included variants in PKP2 (40%), DSG2 (20%), DSP (20%) and TTN (20%).ConclusionsThe coexistence of CS and ACM-associated genetic variants is associated with distinct clinical features, including PR prolongation, AVB1°, septal involvement and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. These findings emphasise the need to evaluate for CS in individuals with ACM and associated genetic variants who present with conduction abnormalities or septal involvement, guiding tailored diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.

Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) is a treatment option for recurrent ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VT/VF) in patients with structural heart disease (SHD). The current and future role of STAR as viewed by cardiologists is unknown. The study aimed to assess the current role, barriers to application, and expected future role of STAR. An online survey consisting of 20 questions on baseline demographics, awareness/access, current use, and the future role of STAR was conducted. A total of 129 international participants completed the survey [mean age 43 ± 11 years, 25 (16.4%) female]. Ninety-one (59.9%) participants were electrophysiologists. Nine participants (7%) were unaware of STAR as a therapeutic option. Sixty-four (49.6%) had access to STAR, while 62 (48.1%) had treated/referred a patient for treatment. Common primary indications for STAR were recurrent VT/VF in SHD (45%), recurrent VT/VF without SHD (7.8%), or premature ventricular contraction (3.9%). Reported main advantages of STAR were efficacy in the treatment of arrhythmias not amenable to conventional treatment (49%) and non-invasive treatment approach with overall low expected acute and short-term procedural risk (23%). Most respondents have foreseen a future clinical role of STAR in the treatment of VT/VF with or without underlying SHD (72% and 75%, respectively), although only a minority expected a first-line indication for it (7% and 5%, respectively). Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation as a novel treatment option of recurrent VT appears to gain acceptance within the cardiology community. Further trials are critical to further define efficacy, patient populations, as well as the appropriate clinical use for the treatment of VT.

BACKGROUND:Rhythm control, either with antiarrhythmic drugs or catheter ablation, and rate control strategies are the cornerstones of atrial fibrillation (AF) management. Despite the increasing role of rhythm control over the past few years, it remains inconclusive which strategy is superior in improving clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVES:This study summarizes the total and time-varying evidence regarding the efficacy of rhythm- vs rate-control strategies in the management of AF. METHODS:We systematically perused the MEDLINE, CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), and Web of Science databases for randomized controlled trials from inception to November 2023. We included studies that compared the efficacy of rhythm control (ie, antiarrhythmic drugs classes Ia, Ic, or III, AF catheter ablation, and electrical cardioversion) and rate control (ie, beta-blocker, digitalis, or calcium antagonist) strategies among patients with nonvalvular AF. The primary outcome was cardiovascular (CV) death, whereas secondary outcomes included all-cause death, stroke, hospitalization for heart failure (HF), sinus rhythm at the end of the follow-up, and rhythm control-related adverse events. A cumulative meta-analysis to assess temporal trends and a meta-regression analysis using the percentage of ablation use was performed. RESULTS:We identified 18 studies with a total of 17,536 patients (mean age: 68.6 ± 9.7 years, 37.9% females) and a mean follow-up of 28.5 months. Of those, 31.9% had paroxysmal AF. A rhythm control strategy reduced CV death (HR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.62-0.96), stroke (HR: 0.801; 95% CI: 0.643-0.998), and hospitalization for HF (HR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.69-0.94) but not all-cause death (HR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.73-1.02) compared with a rate control strategy. This benefit was driven by contemporary studies, whereas more ablation use within the rhythm control arm was associated with improved outcomes, except stroke. CONCLUSIONS:In patients with AF, a contemporary rhythm control strategy leads to reduced CV mortality, HF events, and stroke compared with a rate control strategy.

Wearable cardioverter defibrillator (WCD) can protect patients from sudden cardiac death due to ventricular tachyarrhythmias and serve as a bridge to decision of definite defibrillator implantation. The aim of this analysis from an international, multicenter WCD registry was to identify predictors of sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) and/or ventricular fibrillation (VF) in this population. One thousand six hundred seventy-five patients with WCD were included in a multicenter registry from 9 European centers, with a median follow-up of 440 days (IQR 120–893). The primary study end point was the occurrence of sustained VT/VF. Sustained VT was detected by WCD in 5.4

Rhythm control, either with antiarrhythmic drugs or catheter ablation, and rate control strategies are the cornerstones of atrial fibrillation (AF) management. Despite the increasing role of rhythm control over the past few years, it remains inconclusive which strategy is superior in improving clinical outcomes. This study summarizes the total and time-varying evidence regarding the efficacy of rhythm- vs rate-control strategies in the management of AF. We systematically perused the MEDLINE, CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), and Web of Science databases for randomized controlled trials from inception to November 2023. We included studies that compared the efficacy of rhythm control (ie, antiarrhythmic drugs classes Ia, Ic, or III, AF catheter ablation, and electrical cardioversion) and rate control (ie, beta-blocker, digitalis, or calcium antagonist) strategies among patients with nonvalvular AF. The primary outcome was cardiovascular (CV) death, whereas secondary outcomes included all-cause death, stroke, hospitalization for heart failure (HF), sinus rhythm at the end of the follow-up, and rhythm control–related adverse events. A cumulative meta-analysis to assess temporal trends and a meta-regression analysis using the percentage of ablation use was performed. We identified 18 studies with a total of 17,536 patients (mean age: 68.6 ± 9.7 years, 37.9% females) and a mean follow-up of 28.5 months. Of those, 31.9% had paroxysmal AF. A rhythm control strategy reduced CV death (HR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.62-0.96), stroke (HR: 0.801; 95% CI: 0.643-0.998), and hospitalization for HF (HR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.69-0.94) but not all-cause death (HR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.73-1.02) compared with a rate control strategy. This benefit was driven by contemporary studies, whereas more ablation use within the rhythm control arm was associated with improved outcomes, except stroke. In patients with AF, a contemporary rhythm control strategy leads to reduced CV mortality, HF events, and stroke compared with a rate control strategy.

Background and Aims: P-wave abnormalities in the 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) have been associated with a higher risk of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) as well as atrial fibrillation (AF). This study aimed to assess pre-determined ECG criteria during sinus rhythm in unselected AIS patients and their value for predicting newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation (NDAF) after hospital admission. Methods: P-wave alterations were measured on 12-lead ECG on admission in all consecutively enrolled patients without known AF between October 2014 and 2017. The outcome of interest was NDAF, identified by prolonged electrocardiographic monitoring within one year after the index AIS. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression was applied to assess the magnitude and independence of the association between pre-selected ECG markers and NDAF. The discriminatory accuracy was evaluated with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and the incremental prognostic value was estimated with the net reclassification index. Results: NDAF was detected in 87 (10%) of 856 patients during a follow-up of 365 days. Out of the pre-selected ECG parameters, advanced interatrial block (aIAB) and PR interval in lead II were independently associated with NDAF in univariable regression analysis. Only aIAB remained a significant predictor in multivariable analysis. Adding aIAB to the best-performing multivariable regression model improved the discriminatory accuracy to predict NDAF from an AUC of 0.78 (95%-CI 0.77–0.80) to 0.81 (95%-CI 0.80–0.83, p < 0.001). Conclusion: aIAB is independently and highly associated with NDAF in patients with AIS, has high inter-rater reliability, and therefore may be helpful to refine diagnostic work-up to search for AF in AIS.

BACKGROUND:Wearable cardioverter defibrillators (WCD) are used as a 'bridging' technology in patients, who are temporarily at high risk for sudden cardiac death (SCD). Several factors should be taken into consideration, for example patient selection, compliance and optimal drug treatment, when WCD is prescribed. We aimed to present real-world data from seven centres from Germany and Switzerland according to age differences regarding the outcome, prognosis, WCD data and compliance.MATERIALS AND METHODS:Between 04/2012 and 03/2021, 1105 patients were included in this registry. Outcome data according to age differences (old ≥45 years compared to young <45 years) were analysed. At young age, WCDs were more often prescribed due to congenital heart disease and myocarditis. On the other hand, ischaemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) was more present in older patients. Wear days of WCD were similar between both groups (p = .115). In addition, during the WCD use, documented arrhythmic life-threatening events were comparable [sustained ventricular tachycardia: 5.8% vs. 7.7%, ventricular fibrillation (VF) .5% vs. .6%] and consequently the rate of appropriate shocks was similar between both groups. Left ventricular ejection fraction improvement was documented over follow-up with a better improvement in younger patients as compared to older patients (77% vs. 63%, p = .002). In addition, at baseline, the rate of atrial fibrillation was significantly higher in the older age group (23% vs. 8%; p = .001). The rate of permanent cardiac implantable electronic device implantation (CiED) was lower in the younger group (25% vs. 36%, p = .05). The compliance rate defined as wearing WCD at least 20 h per day was significantly lower in young patients compared to old patients (68.9% vs. 80.9%, p < .001). During the follow-up, no significant difference regarding all-cause mortality or arrhythmic death was documented in both groups. A low compliance rate of wearing WCD is predicted by young patients and patients suffering from non-ischaemic cardiomyopathies.CONCLUSION:Although the compliance rate in different age groups is high, the average wear hours tended to be lower in young patients compared to older patients. The clinical events were similar in younger patients compared to older patients.

Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM) is a hereditary myocardial disease characterized by the replacement of the ventricular myocardium with fibrous fatty deposits. ACM is usually inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern with variable penetrance and expressivity, which is mainly related to ventricular tachyarrhythmia and sudden cardiac death (SCD). Importantly, significant progress has been made in determining the genetic background of ACM due to the development of new techniques for genetic analysis. The exact molecular pathomechanism of ACM, however, is not completely clear and the genotype–phenotype correlations have not been fully elucidated, which are useful to predict the prognosis and treatment of ACM patients. Different gene-targeted and transgenic animal models, human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocyte (hiPSC-CM) models, and heterologous expression systems have been developed. Here, this review aims to summarize preclinical ACM models and platforms promoting our understanding of the pathogenesis of ACM and assess their value in elucidating the ACM genotype–phenotype relationship. Graphical Abstract

Case PresentationA 60-year-old man with a history of a rightsided accessory pathway ablated at age 50, presented to a smaller hospital with recurrent palpitations and a regular wide-complex tachycardia (WCT) (fig.1).He received intravenous amiodarone (300 mg) from the emergency physician and subsequently converted into sinus rhythm.Echocardiography revealed no pathological findings.

BACKGROUND:Some studies have shown that there may be an increase in the frequency of erectile dysfunction after COVID-19. However, no long-term study has investigated whether this is permanent or temporary. In this study, we aimed to examine whether there was an increase in the frequency of erectile dysfunction among individuals with a history of COVID-19, and, if there was, whether their condition improved over time. MATERIALS AND METHODS:In this study, a total of 125 healthy male healthcare workers, 95 with and 30 without a history of COVID-19, were evaluated in terms of erectile function. Four study groups were formed. The first three groups consisted of individuals with a history of COVID-19 confirmed by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test at different times, who recovered from the disease (time elapsed since COVID-19 positivity: <6 months for Group 1, 6 to 12 months for Group 2, and >12 months for Group 3). The individuals in Group 4 did not have a history of COVID-19 diagnosis. In order to evaluate the erectile function of the participants, they were asked to complete the five-item International Index of Erectile Function questionnaire (IIEF-5). Then, statistical analyses were performed to evaluate whether there was a difference between the groups in terms of the IIEF-5 scores. RESULTS:There was a statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of the IIEF-5 scores (p < 0.001), and this difference was determined to be caused by the significantly higher IIEF-5 scores of Groups 3 and 4 compared to Group 1 (p = 0.004 and p < 0.001, respectively). In addition, the IIEF-5 score of Group 4 was statistically significantly higher than that of Group 2 (p < 0.001). However, the IIEF-5 scores did not statistically significantly differ between Groups 1 and 2, Groups 2 and 3, and Groups 3 and 4 (p > 0.999, p = 0.204, and p = 0.592, respectively). CONCLUSION:There may be deterioration in erectile function after COVID-19; however, this tends to improve over time, especially from the first year after active infection. Given that vascular, hormonal, and/or psychogenic factors may lead to the development of erectile dysfunction after COVID-19, we consider that in order to easily manage this process, it is important to determine the underlying cause, initiate appropriate treatment, and inform couples that this situation can be temporary.

A 59-year-old man with a diagnosis of definite ARVC without overt left ventricular involvement presented with recurrent palpitations. The surface 12-lead electrocardiogram raised the suspicion of atrial tachycardia.

Patients at high risk for sudden cardiac death (SCD) may benefit from wearable cardioverter defibrillators (WCD) by avoiding immediate implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation. Different factors play an important role including patient selection, compliance and optimal drug treatment. We aimed to present real world data from 4 centers from Germany and Switzerland. Between 04/2012 and 03/2019, 708 patients were included in this registry. Patients were followed up over a mean time of 28 ± 35.5 months. Outcome data including gender differences and different etiologies of cardiomyopathy were analyzed. Out of 708 patients (81.8% males, mean age 61.0 ± 14.6), 44.6% of patients had non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, 39.8% ischemic cardiomyopathy, 7.9% myocarditis, 5.4% prior need for ICD explantation and 2.1% channelopathy. The mean wear time of WCD was 21.2 ± 4.3 h per day. In 46% of patients, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was > 35% during follow-up. The younger the patient was, the higher the LVEF and the lower the wear hours per day were. The total shock rate during follow-up was 2.7%. Whereas an appropriate WCD shock was documented in 16 patients (2.2%), 3 patients received an inappropriate ICD shock (0.5%). During follow-up, implantation of a cardiac implantable electronic device was carried out in 34.5% of patients. When comparing German patients (n = 516) to Swiss patients (n = 192), Swiss patients presented with longer wear days (70.72 ± 49.47 days versus 58.06 ± 40.45 days; p = 0.001) and a higher ICD implantation rate compared to German patients (48.4% versus 29.3%; p = 0.001), although LVEF at follow-up was similar between both groups. Young age is a negative independent predictor for the compliance in this large registry. The most common indication for WCD was non-ischemic cardiomyopathy followed by ischemic cardiomyopathy. The compliance rate was generally high with a decrease of wear hours per day at younger age. Slight differences were found between Swiss and German patients, which might be related to differences in mentality for ICD implantation.