The prognosis of patients with glioblastoma (GBM) remains poor despite current treatments. Targeted therapy in GBM has been the subject of intense investigation but has not been successful in clinical trials. The reasons for the failure of targeted therapy in GBM are multifold and include a lack of patient selection in trials, the failure to identify driver mutations, and poor blood-brain barrier penetration of investigational drugs. Here, we describe a case of a durable complete response in a newly diagnosed patient with GBM with leptomeningeal dissemination and PTPRZ1-MET fusion who was treated with tepotinib, a brain-penetrant MET inhibitor. This case of successful targeted therapy in a patient with GBM demonstrates that early molecular testing, identification of driver molecular alterations, and treatment with brain-penetrant small molecule inhibitors have the potential to change the outcome in select patients with GBM.

Background:We observed rapid tumor progression following COVID-19 infection among patients with glioblastoma and sought to systematically characterize their disease course in a retrospective case-control study. Methods:Using an institutional database, we retrospectively identified a series of COVID-19-positive glioblastoma cases and matched them by age and sex 1:2 to glioblastoma controls who had a negative COVID-19 test during their disease course. Demographic and clinical data were analyzed. Hyperprogression was defined using modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors criteria. Time to progression and overall survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results:Thirty-two glioblastoma cases with positive COVID-19 testing were matched to 64 glioblastoma controls with negative testing; age, sex, and molecular profiles did not differ between groups. Progression events occurred in 27 cases (84%) and 46 controls (72%). Of these, 14 cases (52%) presented with multifocal disease or leptomeningeal disease at progression compared with 10 controls (22%; P = .0082). Hyperprogression was identified in 13 cases (48%) but only 4 controls (9%; P = .0001). Cases had disease progression at a median of 35 days following COVID-19 testing, compared with 164 days for controls (P = .0001). Median survival from COVID-19 testing until death was 8.3 months for cases but 17 months for controls (P = .0016). Median overall survival from glioblastoma diagnosis was 20.7 months for cases and 24.6 months for controls (P = .672). Conclusions:Patients with glioblastoma may have accelerated disease progression in the first 2 months after COVID-19 infection. Infected patients should be monitored vigilantly. Future investigations should explore tumor-immune microenvironment changes linking tumor progression and COVID-19.

Purpose: Treatment options for leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) are limited. A recent phase 2 study found that proton craniospinal irradiation (pCSI) was well-tolerated and improved survival. We report our experience with pCSI for solid-tumor LM. Methods and Materials: This is a retrospective review of patients treated with pCSI for solid-tumor LM from December 2020 to January 2024 at our center. Patient characteristics were summarized using descriptive statistics. Median overall survival and median central nervous system progression-free survival from the first day of pCSI were estimated using Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Results: We identified 45 patients who completed pCSI. The median age was 54 years (range, 23-79); 73% were female, and 53% lived more than 100 miles from our center. Breast cancer (53%), lung cancer (20%), and melanoma (9%) were the most common primary cancers; 51% of patients had stable systemic disease at LM diagnosis. All had imaging evidence of LM, and 64% of cases were confirmed using cytologic examination of the cerebrospinal fluid. Eighty percent had symptomatic LM, and the median Karnofsky performance scale at LM diagnosis was 80. The median time from primary cancer diagnosis to LM detection was 23.1 months (range, 0-221.3). Fifty-three percent of patients had active brain metastasis at LM diagnosis; 33% of all patients had received prior intracranial radiation. The median time from simulation to pCSI start was 12 days. At the first visit following pCSI, the median Karnofsky performance scale score was 70. During or right after radiation, 76% of patients reported nausea, 51% headache, and 31% fatigue. Following pCSI, 4% received intrathecal chemotherapy, 67% systemic therapy, and 9% hospice care; 18% were observed and 2% lost to follow-up. Median overall survival was 13.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.2 to not reached), and median progression-free survival was 6.5 months (95% CI, 4.9-12.8). Conclusions: The outcomes in our cohort are comparable to those recently reported in a phase 2 trial. Further study is indicated to determine the optimal candidates for pCSI and sequential therapies.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) reinvigorate anti-tumor immune responses by disrupting co-inhibitory immune checkpoint molecules such as programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4). Although ICIs have had unprecedented success and have become the standard of care for many cancers, they are often accompanied by off-target inflammation that can occur in any organ system. These immune related adverse events (irAEs) often require steroid use and/or cessation of ICI therapy, which can both lead to cancer progression. Although irAEs are common, the detailed molecular and immune mechanisms underlying their development are still elusive. To further our understanding of irAEs and develop effective treatment options, there is pressing need for preclinical models recapitulating the clinical settings. In this review, we describe current preclinical models and immune implications of ICI-induced skin toxicities, colitis, neurological and endocrine toxicities, pneumonitis, arthritis, and myocarditis along with their management.

Abstract Current standard-of-care for glioblastoma (GBM) includes surgery followed by radiation with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide. There are limited treatment options available upon progression or recurrence of disease. Options often involve participation in clinical trials with promising new therapies. However, patients may not meet the strictly defined entry criteria to participate in these clinical trials. Under an Expanded Access (EA) program, we have treated 14 recurrent GBM patients with VAL-083, they were not eligible to participate in other clinical trials. The median time from last progression to start of VAL-083 was 1.0 month (95%CI:0.09-2.67). All patients had received chemoradiation with temozolomide. Five (5/14;36%) patients had ≥ 2 recurrences, 8/14 (57%) had multifocal disease, and the median KPS was 80 (95%CI:70-90). All patients had unmethylated MGMT promoter, 13/14 (93%) were IDH-WT, 9/14 (64%) had a TERT promoter mutation, 6/14 (43%) had a PTEN mutation, and 4/14 (28%) had an EGFR mutation. All patients received treatment with VAL-083 at 30 mg/m2 x 3 days every 21 days. Five patients with cerebral edema refractory to steroids received bevacizumab (BEV;10 mg/kg) concurrently with VAL-083, and 8 patients received dexamethasone (Dex; >4 mg/day) with VAL-083. This is the first report of the use of VAL-083 in combination with BEV (VAL-03/BEV).The main adverse event was thrombocytopenia consistent with prior experience. Four (4/14; 28%) patients had a dose reduction, 3 of which were due to thrombocytopenia. No patients had a dose reduction while receiving VAL-083/BEV. Two patients who progressed on VAL-083, were later treated with CCNU, and myelosuppression was not observed.Median progression-free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS) from last progression were 5.7 months (95%CI:1.3-7.9) and 8.3 months (95%CI:3.0-14.3), respectively. Additional treatment, safety and outcome data will be presented at the meeting.Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03138629. EA treatment plans were approved by MD Anderson Cancer Center IRB.

Abstract BACKGROUND Current standard-of-care for glioblastoma (GBM) includes surgery followed by chemoradiation with temozolomide (TMZ) followed by adjuvant TMZ. Almost all GBM patients experience disease progression despite upfront standard-of-care treatment, with a median overall survival of 3-9 months after first recurrence. There are limited treatment options at the time of disease progression, apart from participation in clinical trials. VAL-083 is a bi-functional DNA damaging agent that induces inter-strand DNA cross-links at N7-guanine in a manner independent of O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT). METHODS Under an Expanded Access program (NCT03138629), we used VAL-083 to treat 30 patients with recurrent GBM who were not eligible to participate in clinical trials. Here we report safety and efficacy results. RESULTS Four patients (13.3%) with leptomeningeal disease were excluded from efficacy evaluation. All patients received chemoradiation with TMZ. Twelve (12/26; 46.2%) patients had ≥2 recurrences and 9/26 (34.6%) had prior lomustine. All tumors had ≥1 mutation, with 14/26 (53.8%) having ≥5 mutations; one patient had a hypermutator phenotype. The most common mutations were TERT (57.7%), PTEN (38.5%), TP53 (26.9%), and NF1 (26.9%). All patients started treatment with VAL-083 at 30 mg/m2/day administered on 3 consecutive days every 21 days. Eight (8/26; 30.8%) patients received bevacizumab concurrently with VAL-083. Eight (8/26; 30.8%) patients had a VAL-083 dose reduction. Patients received a median of 3.0 (5-95pth 1-10) VAL-083 treatment cycles. Median progression free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS) from last disease progression was 5.1 (95%CI: 2.7-7.2) and 9.8 (95%CI: 5.3-16.4) months, respectively. VAL-083 was well-tolerated and the most frequent adverse events were consistent with prior experience, i.e., thrombocytopenia and neutropenia. CONCLUSIONS Use of VAL-083 continues to show benefit in the treatment of GBM patients who have had multiple recurrences and have limited therapeutic options.

To report outcomes with proton craniospinal irradiation (pCSI) for solid tumor leptomeningeal metastasis (LM).

2076 Background: DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) is a pivotal component of DNA damage repair (DDR) pathways and is an attractive target in glioblastoma because its expression renders tumors less vulnerable to radiotherapy. Peposertib is a small molecule DNA-PK inhibitor that has been pre-clinically shown to potentiate radiotherapy and regress glioblastoma tumors. We conducted a two-stage phase I trial of peposertib plus radiation in patients with newly-diagnosed MGMT-unmethylated glioblastoma (NCT04555577). Methods: In stage 1, patients received concurrent peposertib plus standard-of-care radiotherapy to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) based on the Bayesian Optimal Interval design (maximum n=24). Stage 2 is a window-of-opportunity expansion cohort and will include 5 surgical patients to evaluate intratumoral drug concentration. Both groups receive 6 cycles of adjuvant temozolomide. Results: Eighteen patients completed the 10-week dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) period; 3@50mg, 3@100mg, 3@200mg, 9@300mg. One DLT (G3 radiation necrosis [RN] at 300mg) was observed. Enrollment of the last three patients into the 300mg dose level began in December 2023 and will complete stage 1. To date, most notable toxicity was transient G3 dermatitis of the scalp (2@200mg, 1@300mg; not a DLT per protocol). Therefore, radiation dose constraints to the skin were incorporated and subsequent patients did not experience this toxicity. After a median follow up of 14.3 months (9.3-18.4), the median OS was 22.9 months [95% CI (16-NR)] and median PFS was 12.7 months [95% CI (9-NR)]. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was available for 16 archival tumor tissue specimens from patients treated on this trial. Two patients had pathology-proven RN (one within and one outside of the DLT period). Both tumors had baseline mutations in DDR genes (i.e. ATRX, DICER1). Recurrent tissue was available for 4 patients after treatment with peposertib, 2 of which demonstrated gain of DDR gene mutations (2 ATM mutations in one patient and gain of MAD2L2 mutation in another patient). Conclusions: The initial safety data of peposertib plus radiation in patients with newly-diagnosed MGMT unmethylated glioblastoma is favorable. The cases with RN in tumors with DDR mutations, the gain of DDR mutations in recurrent tumors, and the cases of scalp dermatitis suggest peposertib activity may correlate with DDR function, and possibly potentiates the effect of radiation. Stage I is an independent stage of the protocol that will enable MTD determination. Complete safety and survival data and correlations with genomics and spatial transcriptomics for Stage I patients will be presented at the meeting. The study was supported by EMD Serono (CrossRef Funder ID: 10.13039/100004755). Clinical trial information: NCT04555577 .

2041 Background: As of January 2023, there have been 6.7 million worldwide deaths attributed to SARS-CoV-2 COVID-19, which has impacted outcomes and medical care for all patients. Relatively little is known about the direct effects mediated by the virus on CNS tumor biology, despite the fact that viral neurotropism is well described, various coronavirus receptors have been observed in glioblastoma (GBM) tissues, and differential monocytic infiltration has been proposed to dysregulate the immune microenvironment. We detected a trend of rapid progression following COVID-19 infection among several patients with primary brain tumor patients and sought to systematically evaluate the pace of progression among infected patients in our institution. Methods: A single-institutional database of COVID-19 patients and an electronic medical record (EMR) search tool were used to identify a total cohort of 67 patients with glioma for retrospective analysis. This included 38 GBMs, 18 IDH-mutant gliomas, 5 ependymomas, 2 pilocytic astrocytomas, 1 diffuse midline glioma, 1 diffuse hemispheric glioma, and 1 ganglioglioma patients, each of whom had a documented COVID-19 infection between June 2020-December 2022. Hyperprogression was defined as tumor increase ≥40% compared to previous scan using RECIST size criteria. Results: Thirty-nine (58%) patients experienced tumor progression following COVID-19 infection at a median of 34 days (range=1-734 days) after testing positive for COVID-19. Twenty-two (56%) had received COVID-19 vaccine before their infection and 5 (13%) had asymptomatic infections. Twenty-two patients had measurably increased tumor area by a median of 63% (range=10-2,900%), 18 of which constituted hyperprogression;16 patients developed multifocal disease, 8 developed new nodular enhancement, 3 developed leptomeningeal disease (LMD), and 2 experienced increased infiltrative disease alone. Ten patients’ presentation with new glioma was preceded by COVID-19 infection by a median of 31 days. GBM patients represented the majority of progression events, among whom 59% progressed within 60 days of documented infection (median 25 days). This subgroup of GBM with rapid progression within 60 days had a mOS from infection of 5.2 months; 89% had TERT promotor mutations and 42% had MGMT promoter methylation. Conclusions: Glioma patients appear to have disease progression at an accelerated pace in the first two months after COVID-19 infection. This suggests that glioma patients should continue observing strict precautions to prevent infection and should be clinically monitored vigilantly after infection, with consideration for short interval imaging during treatment. These preliminary data warrant further investigation exploring changes of immune cell infiltration in the tumor microenvironment and the possible correlation between tumor progression and COVID-19.

Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) and Rosai-Dorfman disease (RDD) are rare non-Langerhans cell histiocytoses (non-LCHs), for which therapeutic options are limited. MAPK pathway activation through BRAFV600E mutation or other genomic alterations is a histiocytosis hallmark and correlates with a favorable response to BRAF inhibitors and the MEK inhibitor cobimetinib. However, there has been no systematic evaluation of alternative MEK inhibitors. To assess the efficacy and safety of the MEK inhibitor trametinib, we retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of 26 adult patients (17 with ECD, 5 with ECD/RDD, 3 with RDD, and 1 with ECD/LCH) treated with orally administered trametinib at 4 major US care centers. The most common treatment-related toxicity was rash (27% of patients). In most patients, the disease was effectively managed at low doses (0.5-1.0 mg trametinib daily). The response rate of the 17 evaluable patients was 71% (73% [8/11] without a detectable BRAFV600E achieving response). At a median follow-up of 23 months, treatment effects were durable, with a median time-to-treatment failure of 37 months, whereas the median progression-free and overall survival were not reached (at 3 years, 90.1% of patients were alive). Most patients harbored mutations in BRAF (either classic BRAF(V600E) or other BRAF alterations) or alterations in other genes involved in the MAPK pathway, eg, MAP2K, NF1, GNAS, or RAS. Most patients required lower than standard doses of trametinib but were responsive to lower doses. Our data suggest that the MEK inhibitor trametinib is an effective treatment for ECD and RDD, including those without the BRAFV600E mutation.

We present the case of an older man with history of rheumatoid arthritis, taking etanercept who developed focal neurologic deficits with imaging findings that raised concern for central nervous system neoplasia, as well as a nondiagnostic initial brain biopsy. Imaging showed left hemispheric leptomeningeal enhancement, as well as left frontal convexity rim-enhancing collections, suspicious for abscess. Empiric antibiotics did not improve the patient's condition, and a second central nervous system biopsy revealed a diagnosis of leptomeningeal immunoglobulin G4–related disease, a rare fibroinflammatory condition. Awareness of this condition, prompt diagnosis, and treatment are imperative to prevent irreversible organ damage, disability, and potentially death.

Current standard-of-care for glioblastoma (GBM) includes surgery followed by concurrent therapy with radiation and temozolomide (TMZ) and adjuvant TMZ. Almost all GBM patients experience recurrent/progressive disease despite upfront standard of care treatment, with a median overall survival of 3-9 mo. after recurrence. There are limited treatment options available upon progression of disease which may include potential participation in clinical trials. However, patients may not meet the strictly defined entry criteria to participate in these clinical trials. VAL-083 is a first-in-class bifunctional alkylating agent that acts independent of O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) methylation status. Under an Expanded Access (EA) program, we have treated 24 patients with recurrent GBM, who were not eligible to participate in clinical trials with VAL-083. Four (4/24; 17%) patients had leptomeningeal disease (LMD) at time of enrolment. While safety data was assessed for all patients, those without LMD (20 patients) were evaluated for efficacy. All patients evaluated for efficacy received chemoradiation with TMZ, and the mean number of adjuvant TMZ cycles was 5 (± 6.2). The median time from last progression to start of VAL-083 was 0.65 mo. (95%CI: 0.32-1.55) and median KPS was 80 (25-75P: 70-90). Eight (8/20; 40%) patients had 2 or more prior recurrences, 9/20 (45%) patients had multifocal disease, and 5/20 (25%) had prior lomustine. Eighteen (18/20; 90%) patients had unmethylated promoter status for MGMT and 18/20 (90%) were IDH wild type. All patients had at least 1 mutation, with 11/20 (55%) having 5 or more mutations, and one patient had hypermutator phenotype with MSH6 mutation. The most common mutations were, TERT 11/20 (55%), PTEN 9/20 (45%), and TP53 6/20 (30%). All patients started treatment with VAL-083 at 30 mg/m2 administered on 3 consecutive days every 21 days. Seven patients received bevacizumab concurrently with VAL-083. VAL-083 was well tolerated and the main adverse events were consistent with prior experience, i.e., thrombocytopenia and neutropenia. Eight (8/24; 33%) patients had a dose reduction, 7 of which were due to thrombocytopenia, and 1 due to neutropenia. Five patients with thrombocytopenia had prior lomustine. As of cut-off date (05 Jan, 2023), median progression free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS) from last disease progression was 5.9 mo (95%CI: 3.9-7.9) and 9.4 mo (95%CI: 3.0-14.3), respectively. In patients without multifocal disease mOS was even longer, 14.3 mo (95%CI: 3.9-14.3). Use of VAL-083 in this expanded access study showed benefit in the treatment of recurrent GBM patients even those who have had multiple recurrences and were not candidates for the treatment through clinical trial. Additional safety and efficacy measures will be presented at the meeting.Clincialtrials.gov Identifier: NCT03138629. All EA treatment requests and plans were approved by MD Anderson Cancer Center IRB. Citation Format: Carlos Kamiya-Matsuoka, Shiao-Pei Weathers, Rebecca A. Harrison, Nazanin K. Majd, Ashley E. Aaroe, Stephanie Knight, Teresa Hanna, Timothy A. Gregory, John Langlands, Dennis Brown, Vinay K. Puduvalli. VAL-083 in patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated under expanded access program [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 2 (Clinical Trials and Late-Breaking Research); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(8_Suppl):Abstract nr LB127.

LMM represents many challenges in both the diagnosis and treatment. The prognosis of patients with LMM remains poor with survival measured in weeks to months despite aggressive management. Managing the patients with LMM requires the development of rapid and improved tools for fast diagnosis and early, non-delayed intervention. However, an extensive field for both diagnosis and treatment remains open for exploration. Future directions may include determining the appropriate treatment for specific patient populations, using personalized medicine when appropriate and feasible, optimal route of administration of drug delivery into the CSF, and aggressive prompt treatment interventions.

Immunotherapy has revolutionized cancer treatment over the past decade. As it is increasingly introduced into routine clinical practice, immune-related complications have become more frequent. Accurate diagnosis and treatment are essential, with the goal of reduced patient morbidity. This review aims to discuss the various clinical manifestations, diagnosis, treatments, and prognosis of neurologic complications associated with the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors, adoptive T-cell therapies, and T-cell redirecting therapies. We also outline a suggested clinical approach related to the clinical use of these agents.

Abstract BACKGROUND Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy has shown limited efficacy in the treatment of glioblastoma (GBM) in both newly diagnosed and recurrent disease which underscores the need for rational combinatorial strategies. Atezolizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that targets PD-L1 and has been shown to enhance the magnitude of tumor-specific T cell responses. Combining PD-L1/PD-1 axis inhibition with targeted therapy like cabozantinib which has both anti-tumoral and immunomodulatory properties may result in synergistic effects. Cabozantinib may modulate the myeloid cell population to overcome resistance to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. METHODS Eligibility criteria were those with recurrent GBM, age >18 yrs with 1st or 2nd recurrence who were naïve to antiangiogenic and receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment. The primary objective of the phase I run-in was to evaluate the safety of atezolizumab in combination with cabozantinib. RESULTS 1 dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of a grade 3 ALT elevation was observed in the first 6 DLT evaluable patients treated during the safety run-in phase. Regarding immune related adverse events, 1 of 6 patients developed atezolizumab-related grade 1 hypothyroidism. 1 of 6 patients developed study treatment-related grade 2 diarrhea. 2 patients after completion of 2 cycles of treatment had evidence of a partial radiographic response ( > 50% decrease). 1 patient had a near partial radiographic response (45% decrease). 2 patients had stable disease after completion of 2 cycles of the combinatorial treatment. 1 patient had only completed the first 28-day cycle, DLT period, and had not yet had imaging to reassess disease status. CONCLUSIONS The combination of atezolizumab with cabozantinib was tolerable, and no new safety signals were noted. In this small cohort of recurrent GBM patients, radiographic responses were observed. The phase II component of the trial is recruiting patients (n = 45) to evaluate clinical efficacy. Multi-omic correlative studies and fecal microbiome analyses are planned.

Glioblastoma (GBM) tumor microenvironment (TME) is a highly heterogeneous and complex system, which in addition to cancer cells, consists of various resident brain and immune cells as well as cells in transit through the tumor such as marrow-derived immune cells. The TME is a dynamic environment which is heavily influenced by alterations in cellular composition, cell-to-cell contact and cellular metabolic products as well as other chemical factors, such as pH and oxygen levels. Emerging evidence suggests that GBM cells appear to reprogram their the TME, and hijack microenvironmental elements to facilitate rapid proliferation, invasion, migration, and survival thus generating treatment resistance. GBM cells interact with their microenvironment directly through cell-to-cell by interaction mediated by cell-surface molecules, or indirectly through apocrine or paracrine signaling via cytokines, growth factors, and extracellular vehicles. The recent discovery of neuron-glioma interfaces and neurotransmitter-based interactions has uncovered novel mechanisms that favor tumor cell survival and growth. Here, we review the known and emerging evidence related to the communication between GBM cells and various components of its TME, discuss models for studying the TME and outline current studies targeting components of the TME for therapeutic purposes.

Pineal masses commonly present with Parinaud syndrome, a triad consisting of upgaze restriction, convergence-retraction nystagmus, and pupillary light-near dissociation from compression of the quadrigeminal plate.

An Editor-in-Chief leads the editorial team and supervises the daily tasks required to prepare articles for publication while managing the overall content and style of the journal. To become Editor-in-Chief, one must have dedicated work ethic, close attention to detail, passion for the editorial process, and a keen ability to work with and give feedback to section editors and authors. For this article, we interviewed Dr. Steven L. Lewis, Dr. Joseph E. Safdieh, and Dr. S. Andrew Josephson about their collective experience of becoming Editors-in-Chief of Continuum, Neurology Today, and JAMA Neurology, respectively. We have compiled tips for aspiring medical writers and editors, based on their expert advice, to guide trainees in this potential career path.