Tirofiban is a glycoproteine (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist, which inhibits platelet-platelet aggregation and is a potential adjunctive antithrombotic treatment in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) or high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). It is administered intravenously as a bolus followed by continuous infusion. However, the dosage recommendations in the United States (US) and European Union (EU) differ considerably. Furthermore, in routine clinical practice, deviations from the recommendations may occur. The objective of the present study was to investigate the impact of different alterations on tirofiban plasma concentrations in US and EU administration regimens and to give suggestions for delay management in clinical practice. We therefore mathematically simulated the effects of different bolus-infusion delays and infusion interruptions in different scenarios according to the renal function. Here, we provide a systematic assessment of concentration patterns of tirofiban in the US versus EU dosage regimens. We show that differences between the two regimens have important effects on plasma drug levels. Furthermore, we demonstrate that deviations from the proper administration mode affect the concentration of tirofiban. Additionally, we calculated the optimal dosage of a second bolus to rapidly restore the initial concentration without causing overdosage. In conclusion, differences in tirofiban dosing regimens between the U.S and EU and potential infusion interruptions have important effects on drug levels that may impact on degrees of platelet inhibition and thus antithrombotic effects. Thus, the findings of our modelling studies may help to explain differences in clinical outcomes observed in previous clinical trials on tirofiban.

Background and purpose Risk prediction with the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk model is guideline-recommended in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. However, the performance of more contemporary scores derived from ACTION (Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network) and National Cardiovascular Data (NCDR) registries remains incompletely understood. We aimed to compare these models in German ACS patients. Methods and results A total of 1567 patients with (Non-)ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI: 1002 patients, STEMI: 565 patients) undergoing invasive management at University Hospital Düsseldorf (Germany) from 2014 to 2018 were included. Overall in-hospital mortality was 7.5% (NSTEMI 3.7%, STEMI 14.5%). Parameters for calculation of GRACE 1.0, GRACE 2.0, ACTION and NCDR risk models and in-hospital mortality were assessed and risk model performance was compared. The GRACE 1.0 risk model for prediction of in-hospital mortality discriminated risk superior (c-index 0.84) to its successor GRACE 2.0 (c-index 0.79, pGRACE1.0vsGRACE2.0 = 0.0008). The NCDR model performed best in discrimination of risk in ACS overall (c-index 0.89; pACTIONvsNCDR < 0.0001; pGRACEvsNCDR < 0.0001) and showed superior performance compared to GRACE in NSTEMI and STEMI subgroups (pGRACEvsNCDR both < 0.02). ACTION and GRACE risk models performed comparable to each other (both c-index 0.84, pGRACEvsACTION = 0.68), with advantages for ACTION in NSTEMI patients (c-index 0.87 vs. 0.84 (GRACE); pGRACEvsACTION = 0.02). ACTION and GRACE 2.0 showed the most accurate calibration of all models. Conclusions In a contemporary German patient population with ACS, modern NCDR and ACTION risk models showed superior performance in prediction of in-hospital mortality compared to the gold-standard GRACE model.

Aims To evaluate whether CMR-derived RV assessment can facilitate risk stratification among patients undergoing transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVR). Background In patients undergoing TMVR, only limited data exist regarding the role of RV function. Previous studies assessed the impact of pre-procedural RV dysfunction stating that RV failure may be associated with increased cardiovascular mortality after the procedure. Methods Sixty-one patients underwent CMR, echocardiography and right heart catheterization prior TMVR. All-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalizations were assessed during 2-year follow-up. Results According to RV ejection fraction (RVEF) <46%, 23 patients (38%) had pre-existing RV dysfunction. By measures of RV end-diastolic volume index (RVEDVi), 16 patients (26%) revealed RV dilatation. Nine patients (15%) revealed both. RV dysfunction was associated with increased right and left ventricular volumes as well as reduced left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (all p<0.05). During follow-up, 15 patients (25%) died and additional 14 patients (23%) were admitted to hospital due to heart failure symptoms. RV dysfunction predicted all-cause mortality even after adjustment for LV function. Similarly, RVEDVi was a predictor of all-cause mortality even after adjustment for LVEDVi. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis unraveled that, among patients presenting with CMR indicative of both, RV dysfunction and dilatation, the majority (78%) experienced an adverse event during follow-up (p<0.001). Conclusion In patients undergoing TMVR, pre-existing RV dysfunction and RV dilatation are associated with reduced survival, in progressive additive fashion. The assessment of RV volumes and function by CMR may aid in risk stratification prior TMVR in these high-risk patients.

Background: Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and atrial fibrillation have increased risks for stroke and bleeding under oral anticoagulation (OAC). We investigated an alternative therapy of percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) in CKD patients in this study. Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing LAAO were included in a retrospective analysis and stratified for kidney function into CKD/Non-CKD groups (cutoff eGFR 60 ml/min). Procedural characteristics, in-hospital and follow-up events were analysed and compared between groups. Results: LAAO was performed in 146 patients (81 CKD; 65 Non-CKD), mean follow-up was 391 days. Groups differed in eGFR (40.1 (CKD) vs. 75.1 (Non-CKD) ml/min) and CHA(2)DS(2)VASc scores (4.65 +/- 1.3 (CKD) vs. 4.06 +/- 1.4 (Non-CKD)). Procedural success was 98.6%, contrast-induced acute kidney injury was significantly more frequent in CKD patients (11.1% vs. 0%; p = .004). Follow-up mortality was higher in CKD (10.5/100 PY vs. 4.2/100 PY; p = .156). Follow-up stroke rates were 2.3/100 (CKD) patient-years (PY) and 1.4/100 PY (Non-CKD) (p = 1.000), corresponding to a relative risk reduction (RRR) of 60% (all), 68% (CKD) and 71% (Non-CKD) compared to expected stroke rates. Follow-up major bleeding rates were 3.5/100 PY (CKD) and 4.2/100 PY (Non-CKD), corresponding to RRR of 57% (all), 61% (CKD) and 53% (Non-CKD) compared to OAC. Conclusions: Left atrial appendage occlusion shows comparable efficacy for stroke and bleeding prevention in CKD and Non-CKD patients. CKD patients experience more adverse events during follow-up and a significantly increased risk for periprocedural contrast-induced acute kidney injury.

Background: Periprocedural uninterrupted anticoagulation for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) became standard after positive results of vitamin K antagonist (VKA) trials. Previous studies of uninterrupted direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vs. VKA have given controversial results. We thus aimed to elucidate the risk/benefit ratio of uninterrupted DOAC vs. VKA during catheter ablation of AF in an updated meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Methods: Online databases were searched for RCTs comparing uninterrupted DOAC to VKA in patients undergoing catheter ablation of AF. Data from retrieved studies were analysed in a comprehensive meta-analysis. Primary safety outcome was major bleeding; primary efficacy outcome was stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA). Secondary outcomes included a composite of major bleeding and stroke or TIA, minor bleeding, acute cerebral lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and mortality. Results: Six eligible RCTs comprising 2,369 patients were included. There were no significant differences in DOAC vs. VKA concerning the rates of major bleeding (2.2% vs. 3.8%; odds ratio (OR) 0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.30-1.56; p = .37) and stroke or TIA (0.2% vs. 0.2%; OR 0.97, CI 0.20-4.72; p = .97). Pooled meta-analysis of secondary outcomes revealed no significant differences (OR 0.73, p = .49 for composite of major bleeding and stroke or TIA; OR 1.08, p = .52 for minor bleeding; OR 1.12, p = .59 for acute cerebral lesions on MRI; and OR 0.60, p = .64 for all-cause mortality). Conclusion: Our meta-analysis suggests that uninterrupted DOAC is not superior to VKA in patients undergoing catheter ablation of AF with comparable rates of major bleeding and stroke.

Diseases of the pulmonary valve (PV) are more prevalent in pediatric cardiology and comprise a rare entity in daily adult cardiac care. Most common are congenital defects. Acquired malfunctions of the PV are usually associated with an already degenerated bioprosthesis in the corresponding anatomical position. Patients can remain asymptomatic for decades due to specific hemodynamic compensatory capacities of the right heart. Echocardiography is the first-line investigation. Moreover complex, multimodality imaging is often used to guide therapeutic decisions. Those should be based on the clinical presentation and the degree of severity. If possible, an interventional approach should be preferred to a surgical procedure, especially in patients with previous heart surgery. The procedure and the recommended life-long and regular follow-ups should be conducted in specialized centers for grown-ups with congenital heart disease. In daily clinical practice, endocarditis prophylaxis and anticoagulation after successful valve replacement remain relevant.

ZusammenfassungErkrankungen der Pulmonalklappe (PK) sind selten und spielen in der Erwachsenenkardiologie eine untergeordnete Rolle. Ätiologisch dominieren angeborene PK-Vitien. Erworbene Vitien entstehen häufig durch die Degeneration einer bereits eingesetzten Bioprothese. Die Echokardiografie bildet die unverzichtbare diagnostische Basis. Um eine optimale therapeutische Entscheidung zu treffen, ist darüber hinaus die multimodale Bildgebung von entscheidender Bedeutung. Aufgrund der rechtskardialen, hämodynamischen Kompensationsmechanismen weisen betroffene Patienten häufig jahrzehntelang keine Symptome auf. Eine Entscheidung zur operativen oder interventionellen Therapie wird anhand des klinischen Verlaufs und des Schweregrades der Erkrankung gefällt. Falls technisch möglich sollte ein interventionelles Vorgehen, insbesondere bei voroperierten Patienten, einem operativen Verfahren gegenüber bevorzugt werden. Der Eingriff sowie die empfohlenen lebenslangen Nachuntersuchungen sollten in einem Schwerpunktzentrum für Erwachsene mit angeborenen Herzfehlern erfolgen. Auf eine Endokarditisprophylaxe und eine patientenadaptierte Gerinnungstherapie ist nach Klappenersatz zu achten.

Background: Guidelines recommend adjunct glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPIs) only in selected patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). This study aimed to evaluate routine GPI use in STEMI treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Methods: Online databases were searched for randomized controlled trials of routine GPI vs control therapy in STEMI. Data from retrieved studies were abstracted and evaluated in a comprehensive meta-analysis. Twenty-one randomized controlled trials with 8585 patients were included: 10 trials randomized tirofiban, 9 abciximab, 1 trial eptifibatide, and 1 trial used abciximab+tirofiban; only 1 trial used dual antiplatelet therapy with prasugrel/ticagrelor. Results: Routine GPI use was associated with a significant reduction in all-cause mortality at 30 days (2.4% [GPI] vs 3.2%; risk ratio [RR], 0.72; P = 0.01) and 6 months (3.7% vs 4.8%; RR, 0.76; P = 0.02), and a reduction in recurrent myocardial infarction (1.1% vs 2.1%; RR, 0.55; P = 0.0006), repeat revascularization (2.5% vs 4.1%; RR, 0.63; P = 0.0001), thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow <3 after percutaneous coronary intervention (5.4% vs 8.2%; RR, 0.61; P < 0.0001), and ischemic stroke (RR, 0.42; P = 0.04). Major (4.7% vs 3.4%; RR, 1.35; P = 0.005) and minor bleedings (7.2% vs 5.1%; RR, 1.39; P = 0.006) but not intracranial bleedings (0.1% vs 0%; RR, 2.7; P = 0.37) were significantly increased under routine GPI. Conclusions: Routine GPI administration in STEMI resulted in a reduction in mortality, driven by reductions in recurrent ischemic events-however predominantly in pre-prasugrel/ticagrelor trials. Trials with contemporary STEMI management are needed to confirm these findings.

The National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) risk scores for mortality, bleeding and acute kidney injury (AKI) are accurate outcome predictors of coronary catheterization procedures in North American populations. However, their application in German clinical practice remained elusive and we thus aimed to verify their use. NCDR scores for mortality, bleeding and AKI and corresponding clinical outcomes were retrospectively assessed in patients undergoing catheterization for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) or for elective coronary procedures at a German Heart Center from 2014 to 2017. Risk model performance was assessed using receiver-operating-characteristic curves (discrimination) and graphical analysis/logistic regression (calibration). A total of 1637 patients were included, procedures were performed for STEMI (565 patients, 34.5%), NSTEMI (572 patients, 34.9%) and elective purposes (500 patients, 30.5%); 6% (13% of STEMI and 5% of NSTEMI patients) presented in cardiogenic shock and 3% with resuscitated cardiac arrest. Radial access was used in 38% of procedures and cross-over was necessary in 5%; PCI was performed in 60% of procedures. In-hospital mortality was 6.3% (STEMI 14.5%; NSTEMI 3.7%; elective 0%) and major bleedings occurred in 5.6% (STEMI 10.6%; NSTEMI 5.4%; elective 0.2%); AKI was detected in 18.1% of patients (STEMI 23.7%; NSTEMI 27.3%; elective 1.4%), amounting to KDIGO stage I/II/III in 11.5%/3.5%/3.2%. NCDR risk models discriminated very well for mortality [AUC 0.93 with 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.91–0.95] and well for major bleeding (AUC 0.82, CI 0.78–0.86) and any AKI (AUC 0.83, CI 0.81–0.86). Discrimination in the subgroup of patients with PCI was comparable (mortality: AUC 0.90; major bleeding: AUC 0.78; any AKI: AUC 0.79). However, calibration showed considerable underestimation of mortality and AKI in high-risk patients, while major bleeding was consistently overestimated (Hosmer–Lemeshow p < 0.02 for all outcomes). The NCDR risk models showed excellent performance in discriminating high-risk from low-risk patients in contemporary German interventional cardiology. Model calibration for adverse event probability prediction, however, is limited and demands recalibration, especially in high-risk patients.

Was ist neu? Frühzeitige Beratung schon vor der Schwangerschaft Alle herzkranken Patientinnen sollten vor einer Schwangerschaft entsprechend ihrem Risikoprofil anhand der mWHO-Klassifizierung (modifizierte World Health Organization) für mütterliches Risiko beraten werden, im besten Fall von einem Schwangerschafts-Herz-Team. Diagnostik vor und während der Schwangerschaft Bei Verdacht auf eine pulmonale Hypertonie hat die Rechtsherzkatheteruntersuchung nach entsprechender Risiko-Nutzen-Abwägung eine IC-Empfehlung, auch während der Schwangerschaft. Für Rhythmusstörungen wurden Überwachungsstufen für die Geburt abhängig vom Arrhythmierisiko definiert. Spezielle Krankheitsbilder Zur Thromboseprophylaxe und -therapie ist körpergewichtsadaptiert niedermolekulares Heparin mit wöchentlichen Anti-Xa-Spiegel-Kontrollen oder unfraktioniertes Heparin mit regelmäßigen aPTT-Kontrollen empfohlen. Eine orale Antikoagulation darf bei niedriger Dosierung neu auch schon während des 1. Trimenons eingesetzt werden. Bei hochgradiger Mitralklappenstenose wird nun eine Behandlung vor der Schwangerschaft empfohlen. Die Empfehlung zur Katheterablation von symptomatischen supraventrikulären Tachykardien wurde von IIbC auf IIaC hochgestuft. Bromocriptin erhielt eine Empfehlung bei postpartaler Kardiomyopathie (IIbB). Bei herzkranken Patientinnen sollte ab der 40. Schwangerschaftswoche eine Geburtseinleitung erwogen werden. Medikamente – Welche sind wann sicher? In der PLLR (Pregnancy and Lactation Rule) hat die neue Leitlinie 150 Medikamente mit ihrem Gefährdungspotenzial aufgeführt. Darüber hinaus können die Webseiten www.safefetus.com oder www.embryotox.de genutzt werden.

The treatment of pregnant patients with a cardiovascular disease is a special challenge to deal with. Before getting pregnant all cardiac patients should get medical advice accordingly to their risk profile in the modified World Health Organization classification of maternal cardiovascular risk. This article has the aim to give an overview of the new or changed recommendations of the new ESC-Guideline for the management of cardiovascular diseases during pregnancy.

Die Echokardiografie ist in Notfallsituationen ein wichtiges Instrument; denn mit ihr lassen sich lebensbedrohliche Pathologien des Herzens und der Aorta ascendens schnell und sicher nachweisen oder ausschließen. Im Folgenden stellen wir einen systematischen Ablauf für den Nachtdienst, in der Notaufnahme oder auf der Intensivstation dar.

Background Aspirin is a key element in prevention of cardiovascular and thromboembolic events. During non-cardiac surgery however, its balance of bleeding risks and benefits remains unclear. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was performed. Online databases were screened for clinical trials randomizing aspirin to no aspirin therapy in non-cardiac surgery. Clinical outcomes of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality, arterial ischemic events, venous thromboembolic events and bleeding events were separately evaluated. Results Seven RCTs comprising 28,302 patients were included. All-cause mortality (3.7% vs. 3.8%; odds ratio (OR) 0.97, CI 0.86–1.10) and cardiovascular mortality (2.0% vs. 2.1%, OR 0.92; CI 0.78–1.09) were not different in aspirin vs. no aspirin groups. Arterial ischemic events showed no differences, including myocardial infarction (2.5% (aspirin) vs. 2.5% (no aspirin)), cerebrovascular events (0.6% (aspirin) vs. 0.6% (no aspirin)) and peripheral arterial events (0.2% (aspirin) vs. 0.3% (no aspirin)). Aspirin significantly reduced the risk for venous thromboembolic events (VTE; 1.5% (aspirin) vs. 2.0% (no aspirin); OR 0.74, CI 0.59–0.94, p=0.02). Perioperative major bleeding was significantly more frequent in aspirin groups (4.4% vs. 3.7%; OR 1.18, CI 1.05 to 1.33, p=0.007). Conclusion Aspirin remained neutral with respect to overall survival, cardiovascular mortality and arterial ischemic events. It reduced venous thromboembolic events at the expense of perioperative major bleedings. Thus, this analysis supports recommendations against perioperative aspirin continuation/initiation in cardiovascular disease patients at intermediate risk, as well as recommendations of aspirin for VTE prophylaxis in orthopedic patients only.

Previous randomized controlled trials (RCT) failed to demonstrate benefits of patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure (PFO-C) over medical therapy (MT) for secondary prevention of cryptogenic ischemic stroke. Three recently published RCTs, however, turned out positive for PFO-C and warrant an updated meta-analysis.

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is frequent in patients with heart failure due to dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). Implantable cardioverter/defibrillator (ICD) device therapy is currently used for primary prevention. However, publication of the DANISH trial has recently given reason for doubt, showing no significant improvement in all-cause mortality in comparison to contemporary medical therapy.

Short bowel syndrome after extensive surgical resection of the intestine is characterised by inadequate digestion and absorption of nutrients. Additional clinical problems include impaired absorption and metabolism of diverse drugs requiring individualised medical therapy or alternative treatments. We report a case of individualised dual antiplatelet therapy in a patient who underwent an extensive intestinal resection complicated by acute myocardial infarction requiring percutaneous coronary intervention and stent implantation. Genetic testing of CYP2C19 gene polymorphisms and platelet aggregation testing were used to assess responses to aspirin, clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor. Given its unique pharmacokinetics with good absorption and without need of metabolism to an active substance, ticagrelor appears to be the best for patients with short bowel syndrome who require dual antiplatelet therapy after coronary stent implantation.

Background Prasugrel is more effective than clopidogrel in reducing platelet aggregation in acute coronary syndromes. Data available on prasugrel reloading in clopidogrel treated patients with high residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) i.e. poor responders, is limited. Objectives To determine the effects of prasugrel loading on platelet function in patients on clopidogrel and high platelet reactivity undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Patients Patients with ACS on clopidogrel who were scheduled for PCI found to have a platelet reactivity ≥40 AUC with the Multiplate Analyzer, i.e. "poor responders" were randomised to prasugrel (60 mg loading and 10 mg maintenance dose) or clopidogrel (600 mg reloading and 150 mg maintenance dose). The primary outcome measure was proportion of patients with platelet reactivity <40 AUC 4 hours after loading with study medication, and also at one hour (secondary outcome). 44 patients were enrolled and the study was terminated early as clopidogrel use decreased sharply due to introduction of newer P2Y12 inhibitors. Results At 4 hours after study medication 100% of patients treated with prasugrel compared to 91% of those treated with clopidogrel had platelet reactivity <40 AUC (p = 0.49), while at 1 hour the proportions were 95% and 64% respectively (p = 0.02). Mean platelet reactivity at 4 and 1 hours after study medication in prasugrel and clopidogrel groups respectively were 12 versus 22 (p = 0.005) and 19 versus 34 (p = 0.01) respectively. Conclusions Routine platelet function testing identifies patients with high residual platelet reactivity ("poor responders") on clopidogrel. A strategy of prasugrel rather than clopidogrel reloading results in earlier and more sustained suppression of platelet reactivity. Future trials need to identify if this translates into clinical benefit. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01339026