The BK polyoma virus has, in recent years, become a significant cause of renal allograft dysfunction and failure. Among 260 adult kidney transplant recipients, those with biopsy-proven BK virus nephropathy (BKVN) were compared with those without BKVN with regard to gender, age, race, rejection episodes, time on dialysis, number of organs transplanted, HLA match, live donor versus deceased donor, cold ischemia time, delayed graft function, cytomegalovirus (CMV) serostatus of donor and recipient, induction therapy, and maintenance immunosuppression. Episodes of rejection (35.7% of patients with BKVN vs 8.5% of patients without BKVN; P = .01), transplantation of >1 organ (35.7% of patients with BKVN vs 9.0% of patients without BKVN; P = .01), positive CMV serology in both donor and recipient (71.4% of patients with BKVN vs 41.1% of patients without BKVN; P = .03), and a greater cumulative dose of daclizumab use at the time of induction (2.24 ± 0.05 mg/kg in patients with BKVN vs 2.03 ± 0.14 mg/kg in patients without BKVN; P = .04) were statistically significant risk factors for the development of BKVN. Those who developed BKVN received a higher mean cumulative dose of rabbit antithymoglobulin for induction therapy, but that difference failed to achieve statistical significance (P = .07).

Sarcoidosis is an unusual disorder of unknown etiology. Clinically apparent renal involvement is rare in sarcoidosis. The incidence of recurrence in transplant recipients is unknown with few cases having been reported previously. Herein we report a case of sarcoidosis involving a renal allograft that occurred 3 years after transplantation and provide a literature review.

Background. Chronic steroid therapy in spite of myriad side effects is widely used in kidney transplantation. This prospective controlled study evaluated safety and efficacy of steroid withdrawal at 2 days in kidney recipients monitored by surveillance biopsy. Methods. In all, 300 kidney recipients were studied; 150 in second-day steroid withdrawal group and 150 in steroid treated group (control group). Immunosuppression was basiliximab induction and maintenance was a calcineurin inhibitor and mycophenolate mofetil or sirolimus. Biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) was treated by methylpredisolone. Surveillance biopsies were completed to evaluate subclinical acute rejection (SCAR) and chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN). Primary end point was acute rejection. Three-year patient and graft survival, new onset diabetes mellitus (NODM), serum creatinine and creatinine clearance were evaluated. Results. Acute rejection was diagnosed in 14% in control group and 16% in steroid withdrawal group. Three-year patient and graft survival was 89% and 79% in control and 91% and 78% in steroid withdrawal group. Serum creatinine and creatinine clearance was 1.9±0.8 and 59±11 in control group and 1.8±0.9 mg/dl and 61±10 mls/minute in steroid withdrawal group. Incidence of SCAR and progression of CAN were comparable in the 2 groups. At 3-years NODM was diagnosed in 21% in control group and 4% in steroid withdrawal group (P<0.01). Conclusions. Two-day steroid withdrawal in kidney transplant recipients did not affect BPAR, SCAR, CAN, graft function and patient and graft survival compared to control group up to 3 years. NODM was significantly less in steroid withdrawal group. Two-day steroid withdrawal is safe and beneficial in kidney transplant recipients.

Background. Chronic steroid therapy in kidney transplantation has myriad side effects and steroid avoidance has become feasible. This prospective study compared the safety and efficacy of steroid avoidance in tacrolimus (TAC)/mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and TAC/sirolimus (SRL) combinations in kidney transplantation. Methods. In all, 150 kidney recipients were analyzed: 75 each in TAC/MMF and TAC/SRL groups. The primary endpoint was acute rejection. Surveillance biopsies were completed to analyze subclinical acute rejection (SCAR) and chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN). Acute rejection and SCAR were treated by methylprednisolone. Two-year patient and graft survival, renal function, and adverse effects were monitored. Results. Acute rejection was seen in 12% of TAC/MMF and 8% of TAC/SRL patients. Two-year actuarial patient survival was 95% and 97%, and graft survival 90% and 90% in TAC/MMF and TAC/SRL groups, respectively. Surveillance biopsy showed cumulative incidence of SCAR was 27 % in TAC/MMF and 16 % in TAC/SRL groups at 2 years (P=0.04). Overall, 33% of recipients in TAC/MMF and 20% in TAC/SRL received methylprednisolone for acute rejection/SCAR. Moderate/severe CAN was 10% in TAC/SRL group and 22% in TAC/MMF group(P=0.06). New-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM) was 4% each in both groups. All recipients remain free of maintenance steroid therapy. Conclusions. Steroid avoidance in tacrolimus-based immunosuppression with MMF or SRL provides equivalent 2-year patient and graft survival with a low incidence of acute rejection and NODM. SCAR and CAN are lower in TAC/SRL compared to TAC/MMF group. The impact of decreased SCAR and CAN in TAC/SRL group on longer-term graft survival and function is to be evaluated.

African American (AA) kidney recipients receive chronic steroid therapy to improve outcomes, despite their high susceptibility to side effects, particularly diabetes and hypertension. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of avoidance of chronic steroid therapy in AA compared to non-AA kidney recipients. Two hundred and six kidney recipients were studied; 103 AA recipients versus 103 non-AA recipients. Induction was basiliximab and maintenance was a calcineurin inhibitor plus mycophenolate mofetil or sirolimus. Surveillance biopsies were preformed at 1, 6 and 12 months to assess subclinical acute rejection (SCAR) and chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN). Biopsy-proven acute rejection (AR) and SCAR were treated by methylprednisolone. The primary end point was AR. Secondary end points were graft function, 1-year patient and graft survival. AR was observed in 16% of AA and 13% of non-AA recipients. SCAR at 1 month was significantly higher in the AA group (p=0.04). One-year actual patient and graft survival in the AA group was 96% and 88% and in the non-AA group 97% and 89%, respectively. Avoidance of chronic steroid therapy directed by surveillance biopsies provides equivalent AR, CAN and 1-year patient and graft survival in AA versus non-AA recipients and a 5% incidence of new onset diabetes mellitus. All recipients remain free of chronic steroid therapy. Longer-term follow-up is ongoing.

BACKGROUND Human immunodeficiency virus-associated nephropathy (HIVAN) has become the third leading cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in African Americans, and is expected to grow exponentially. Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has significantly prolonged the survival of patients with HIV infection. Despite the growing number of HIV-positive dialysis patients with prolonged life expectancy, kidney transplantation with immunosuppression has been declined because it is considered a waste of scarce donor kidneys due to potential increases in morbidity and mortality. METHODS The institutional review board of Drexel University College of Medicine and Hahnemann University Hospital approved this prospective study. The aim was to find out safety and success of kidney transplantation, and the effect of immunosuppression on HIV infection. Forty HIV-positive dialysis patients received kidney transplantation between February 2001 and January 2004. Patient inclusion criteria were maintenance of HAART, plasma HIV-1 RNA of <400 copies/mL, absolute CD4 counts of 200 cells/muL or more. Immunosuppression was basiliximab induction and maintenance with cyclosporine, sirolimus, and steroids. HAART was continued post-transplant. Acute rejections were diagnosed by biopsy and treated with methylprednisolone. Surveillance biopsies were completed at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months, and evaluated for subclinical acute rejection, chronic allograft nephropathy, and HIVAN. RESULTS One- and 2-year actuarial patient survival was 85% and 82%, respectively, and graft survival was 75% and 71%, respectively. Plasma HIV-1 RNA remained undetectable, and CD4 counts remained in excess of 400 cells per muL with no evidence of AIDS for up to 2 years. CONCLUSION One- and 2-year graft survival is comparable to other high-risk populations receiving kidney transplantation. One- and 2-year patient survival is higher than HIV patients maintained on dialysis. Immunosuppression does not adversely affect HIV recipients maintained on HAART in the short term.

This study compares outcomes of kidney transplantation with two distinct induction protocols Basiliximab (Simulect) versus Muromonab (OTK 3) in the setting of cyclosporine (Neoral)-based immunosuppression. Postinduction protocols included either total prednisone avoidance or prednisone sparing versus standard prednisone dosing. Two hundred forty five adult patients receiving kidney transplantation between 1995 and 2000 were included in the study. Treatment in group 1 was OKT 3 + Neoral + adjunct + standard prednisone; group 2, Simulect + Neoral + adjunct + steroid sparing; group 3, Simulect + Neoral + adjunct + no prednisone. The demographics between all groups were similar. The mean (+/- SD) trough cyclosporine levels at 1 month were 276 +/- 128 versus 291 +/- 180 versus 398 +/- 365 (P=.020); at 3 months were 261 +/- 120 versus 280 +/- 152 versus 399 +/- 408 (P=.32); at 12 month were 235 +/- 144 versus 245 +/- 154 versus 234 +/- 132 (P=.96). Creatinine clearance at 1 month was 59 +/- 24 versus 58 +/- 18 versus 47 +/- 23 mL/min (P=.004); at 3 months was 66 +/- 28 versus 62 +/- 22 versus 53 +/- 25 mL/min (P=.007); at 12 months was 68 +/- 38 versus 65 +/- 22 versus 64 +/- 29 mL/min (P=.556). Serum creatinine at 1 month was 1.8 +/- 0.9 versus 1.6 +/- 1.2 versus 2.8 +/- 2.21 mg/dL (P=.005); at 3 months was 1.7 +/- 0.6 versus 1.9 +/- 1.0 versus 2.3 +/- 1.3 mg/dL (P=.007); at 12 months was 1.9 +/- 1.3 versus 2.1 +/- 1.0 versus 2.3 +/- 1.7 mg/dL (P=.179). The incidence of acute rejection within 1 year in the respective groups were 28% versus 15% versus 16%. Therefore, we conclude that using Simulect in transplant recipients results in long-term patient and graft survival similar to those achieved with OKT 3. The use of Simulect resulted in significant reduction in clinical rejection incidence within the first year regardless of steroid use. Thus, the use of Simulect allows complete steroid avoidance in Neoral-based immunosuppression regimen.