Die Fallot’sche Tetralogie gilt im späteren Kindes- und Erwachsenalter als häufigster zyanotischer Herzfehler und tritt bei ca. 0,25 Neugeborenen unter tausend Geburten auf. Wegen der niedrigen Überlebenschance der Patienten ohne frühe chirurgische Korrektur konnten die Spätfolgen dieses Krankheitsbildes nur in wenigen Fällen untersucht werden. Wir berichten über ein komplexes Beispiel einer Fallot-Tetralogie bei einem Erwachsenen, der ohne chirurgische oder medizinische Behandlung überlebte. Seit Kindheit war ein Ventrikelseptumdefekt bekannt. Die Diagnose der Fallot’schen Tetralogie wurde im Alter von 74 Jahren gestellt, als der Patient zur invasiven Diagnostik und ICD-Implantation wegen einer dokumentierten ventrikulären Tachykardie mit nachfolgender Synkope in unsere Einrichtung aufgenommen wurde.

Tetralogy of Fallot is the most common cyanotic cardiac malformation in late childhood and adult, occurring in approximately 0.25 of 1000 live births. Most patients undergo early surgical correction. Therefore, the natural history of this disease has been evaluated in only a few cases. We report a complex case of a tetralogy of Fallot, who reached the age of 74 years without surgical or medical treatment and who was transferred to our clinic after syncope due to ventricular tachycardia.

AIMS:Efficacy of pace-termination of atrial arrhythmias (ATP) may depend on atrial cycle length and regularity. Whether device programming of ATP therapies can improve ATP efficacy and alter atrial tachyarrhythmia burden is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS:ATP efficacy was evaluated in 61 patients (39 males; 66 +/- 10 years) with a standard indication for pacing, 95% with a history of AT/AF. Each patient was implanted with a novel DDDRP pacemaker capable of delivering ATP therapy. ATP efficacy and AT/AF frequency and burden were compared within each patient during a period of nominal ATP programming (NP) followed by a period of aggressive incremental programming (IP). Adjusted ATP-termination efficacy was higher during IP than during NP (54.8% vs 37.9%, P < 0.05). No differences in AT/AF frequency (3.3 +/- 5.9 vs 3.2 +/- 6.9 day(-1)) or burden (18 +/- 28% vs 18 +/- 29%) were observed comparing NP with IP. The majority of episodes during both the NP (81%) and IP (77%) periods terminated within 10 min. Episodes lasting 24 h or more accounted for only 0.4% of the episodes in both groups. but accounted for 38% of the average burden during NP and 51% during IP. CONCLUSIONS:Device programming of ATP therapies can influence the number of treated episodes and the efficacy of ATP therapies although arrhythmic frequency and burden may not change. Total atrial arrhythmia burden is disproportionately influenced by long (>24 h) episodes.

UROPACE 2003 &hernia in pigs.The aim of the study was to evaluate the time course of changes in ventricular fibrillation (VFTJ and defibrillation (DFTJ threshold of transiently ischemic myocardium after a 45 min preconditioning period.

Pacing for Treatment of Atrial Tachyarrhythmias. Introduction: Patients with bradycardia requiring permanent pacing frequently suffer from additional atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATs). This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of atrial antitachycardia pacing (ATP) and the performance of pacing for AT prevention implemented into a new pacemaker.Methods and Results: In patients with conventional indications for permanent pacing, an investigational DDDRP pacemaker (Medtronic AT500, model 7253) was implanted. The primary study objectives were to determine the safety of overall device functioning and its efficacy in terminating spontaneous AT. A secondary endpoint was to determine the reliability of AT detection. Pacemaker memory functions were used to analyze the impact of dedicated pacing algorithms on AT prevention. In 33 European and Canadian centers, 325 patients were enrolled (mean follow-up 2.3 +/-1.3 months). Complication-free survival at 3 months was 88%. In 2,145 episodes stored with atrial electrograms, AT detection was confirmed in 97%. The algorithm for continuous overdrive pacing increased the percentage of atrial pacing to 97%. After ATP activation, 16,683 of 52,468 AT episodes were treated (120 patients). Of these, 8,903 episodes (53%) were terminated successfully by ATP. No proarrhythmic effect of preventive pacing or atrial ATP was observed. Preventive pacing algorithms increased the median percentage of atrial pacing from 62% to 97%. However, the number of AT/AF (atrial fibrillation) episodes (4.1 vs 4.1 per patient per day) and the time in AT/AF (13.7% vs 12.8%) was not significantly different before and after activation of preventive pacing.Conclusion: DDDRP pacing with a new system for AT therapy was safe and associated with successful pace-termination of AT in 53% of episodes. Preventive pacing and atrial ATP algorithms represent two new functions that can be implemented safely into pacemaker systems for nonpharmacologic treatment of ATs in patients requiring pacemaker therapy.