As many countries are transitioning from cytology to human papillomavirus (HPV) testing as the primary cervical cancer screening test, we evaluated the impact of cumulative HPV screening during the implementation of HPV screening in the Norwegian cervical cancer screening programme (CervicalScreen Norway). Data from the second HPV screening round was compared with data from the first round. The second-round analyses included only women who returned to routine screening 4-6 years following a negative HPV test in the first round. Associations between screening rounds and HPV positivity, cytology results, and follow-up recommendations were estimated by multinomial logistic regression, and relative risks of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, grade 3 or worse (CIN3+) by Cox regression. There was a 42% lower risk of being HPV positive in the second screening round compared to the first (age-adjusted relative risk ratio (aRRR) 0.58, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53 to 0.65), and a 70% lower risk of having high-grade cytology among HPV16 positive women (0.30, 0.12 to 0.78). There was also a 51% reduction in referrals for immediate colposcopy (0.49, 0.39 to 0.62). The overall risk of CIN3+ was 71% lower in the second round compared to the first (age-adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.29, 95%CI 0.21-0.40), and lower among HPV16 and other high-risk HPV positive women, but not among HPV18 positives. No cervical cancers were diagnosed in the second round (mean follow-up 2.4 years). Our findings indicate that HPV test results from previous screening rounds should be considered when designing optimal screening algorithms.

BACKGROUND:Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 (CIN1) is often managed by active surveillance, as the risk of progression to high grade lesions is reported to be low, but long-term data is sparse. To inform management of CIN1, we estimated risk of progression and occurrence of treatment in women attending a cervical cancer screening program. METHODS:We used nationwide, registry data on all women aged 25-69 years attending the Norwegian Cervical Cancer Screening Program in 2002-2019. The eligible source population was women with at least one cytology registration (n = 1,771,876). Women with a histologically confirmed, first CIN1 diagnosis were included (n = 26,130) and followed for detection of CIN2+, defined as histologically confirmed CIN2, CIN3, adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), or cervical cancer. CIN3+ was defined as CIN3, AIS, or cervical cancer. Treatment included both excision and ablation. RESULTS:Overall, the cumulative incidence of CIN2+ increased to 9.5% (95% confidence interval (CI), 8.8 to 9.5) during the first year and to 19.0% (95% CI, 18.4-19.5) during the first five years. For women with high-grade cytology, 5-year cumulative incidence reached 26.0% (95% CI, 25.0-27.0), whereas for women with normal or low-grade cytology, but HPV16 and/or HPV18 positive status, the corresponding estimate was 25.0% (95% CI, 23.3-26.8). Other high-risk HPV genotypes and HPV negative status were associated with lower risks (5-year cumulative incidence 15.5% (95% CI, 14.5-16.6) and 8.2% (95% CI, 7.1-9.5), respectively). Detection of CIN3+ was substantial (cumulative incidence 5.7% (95% CI, 5.4-6.0) and 12.7% (95% CI, 12.2-13.1) after 1 and 5 years, respectively), and overall, cumulative incidence of treatment was 15.2% (95% CI, 14.7-15.7) after 5 years, following similar patterns as observed for CIN2+. CONCLUSIONS:A differentiation of follow-up guidelines by index cytology and HPV16/18 status for women diagnosed with CIN1, might be warranted.

Supplementary Figure from Randomized Implementation of a Primary Human Papillomavirus Testing–based Cervical Cancer Screening Protocol for Women 34 to 69 Years in Norway

Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) is caused by human papillomavirus (HPV); however, factors such as HPV genotype and individual immune response may also contribute to its development. The loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) is a treatment for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), as approximately 30% of these cases may progress to cancer. However, 20–40% of cases will regress spontaneously. HPV16 infection constitutes the highest risk for progression to cervical cancer and a lower probability of regression. Knowledge regarding the regression of lesions caused by other high-risk genotypes alone or in association with biomarker expression and lesion length has been limited. In the present study, the regression rates of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions were calculated. Twenty-one percent of the 161 women diagnosed with CIN2-3 on colposcopy-directed biopsies exhibited regression (defined as CIN1 or less) in the subsequent cone excisions. The mean interval between biopsy and treatment was 113 days (range of 71–171). High-grade lesions of the squamous epithelium caused by HPV16, together with lesions caused by HPV31, 52 and 58, showed significantly lower regression rates (HR 0.54, 0.22–0.75; low-regression group) than lesions caused by HPV18, 33, 35, 39, and 45 (HR 2.85, 1.54–5.28; high-regression group). A multivariate analysis of HPV genotypes, epithelial expressions of pRb and p53, immune cell proportions in the stroma (CD4/CD25 and CD4/CD8), and lesion lengths correctly predicted regression in 78% (Harrell‘s C). A Harrell‘s C value of 82% for the low-regression group indicates that different HPV genotypes or groups, together with divergent patterns of tumor suppressors, immune cells, and lesion size, can give prognostic information regarding the outcome of CIN2-3.

As Norway considers revising triage approaches following their first adolescent cohort with human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination entering the cervical cancer screening program, we analyzed the health impact and cost-effectiveness of alternative primary HPV triage approaches for women initiating cervical cancer screening in 2023. We used a multimodeling approach that captured HPV transmission and cervical carcinogenesis to evaluate the health benefits, harms and cost-effectiveness of alternative extended genotyping and age-based triage strategies under five-yearly primary HPV testing (including the status-quo screening strategy in Norway) for women born in 1998 (ie, age 25 in 2023). We examined 35 strategies that varied alternative groupings of high-risk HPV genotypes ("high-risk" genotypes; "medium-risk" genotypes or "intermediate-risk" genotypes), number and types of HPV included in each group, management of HPV-positive women to direct colposcopy or active surveillance, wait time for re-testing and age at which the HPV triage algorithm switched from less to more intensive strategies. Given the range of benchmarks for severity-specific cost-effectiveness thresholds in Norway, we found that the preferred strategy for vaccinated women aged 25 years in 2023 involved an age-based switch from a less to more intensive follow-up algorithm at age 30 or 35 years with HPV-16/18 genotypes in the "high-risk" group. The two potentially cost-effective strategies could reduce the number of colposcopies compared to current guidelines and simultaneously improve health benefits. Using age to guide primary HPV triage, paired with selective HPV genotype and follow-up time for re-testing, could improve both the cervical cancer program effectiveness and efficiency.

An organised screening programme for cervical cancer (CervicalScreen Norway) was implemented in Norway in 1995. The overall aim of the programme is to reduce the incidence and mortality of cervical cancer, and the screening coverage should exceed 80%. Women in the target age group (25-69 years) are invited for screening every third or fifth year depending on whether the primary screening test is a cytology smear or an HPV (human papillomavirus) test. Since the initiation, there have been major changes within the programme and HPV testing has become increasingly important. The primary screening test has changed from cytology for the whole target age group to primary HPV testing for women from the age of 34, HPV genotype information is directing the follow-up of women in the screening algorithm, and HPV self-sampling will be implemented to increase attendance in under-screened women. CervicalScreen Norway has had a significant impact on reducing the incidence and mortality of the disease. Nevertheless, there has been an increase in incidence in Norway the last decade, in particular among young women. In 2018, the WHO Director-General announced an ambitious global call for action to eliminate cervical cancer through vaccination, screening and treatment. CervicalScreen Norway supports the ambition of the WHO and is working towards this goal.

Implementation of high-risk human papilloma virus (HPV) screening and the increasing proportion of HPV vaccinated women in the screening program will reduce the percentage of HPV positive women with oncogenic potential. In search of more specific markers to identify women with high risk of cancer development, we used RNA sequencing to compare the transcriptomic immune-profile of 13 lesions with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN3) or adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) and 14 normal biopsies from women with detected HPV infections. In CIN3/AIS lesions as compared to normal tissue, 27 differential expressed genes were identified. Transcriptomic analysis revealed significantly higher expression of a number of genes related to proliferation, (CDKN2A, MELK, CDK1, MKI67, CCNB2, BUB1, FOXM1, CDKN3), but significantly lower expression of genes related to a favorable immune response (NCAM1, ARG1, CD160, IL18, CX3CL1). Compared to the RNA sequencing results, good correlation was achieved with relative quantitative PCR analysis for NCAM1 and CDKN2A. Quantification of NCAM1 positive cells with immunohistochemistry showed epithelial reduction of NCAM1 in CIN3/AIS lesions. In conclusion, NCAM1 and CDKN2A are two promising candidates to distinguish whether women are at high risk of developing cervical cancer and in need of frequent follow-up.

Abstract Background: Cervical cancer screening programs are facing a programmatic shift where screening protocol based on human papillomavirus testing (HPV-Screening protocol) is replacing the liquid-based cytology (LBC-Screening protocol). For safe technology transfer within the nationwide screening programme in Norway, HPV-Screening protocol was implemented randomized to compare the real-world effectiveness of HPV-Screening protocol and LBC-Screening protocol at the first screening round. Methods: Among 302,295 women ages 34 to 69 years scheduled to attend screening from February 2015 to June 2017, 157,447 attended. A total of 77,207 were randomly allocated to the HPV-Screening protocol and 80,240 were allocated to the LBC-Screening protocol. All women were followed up for 18 months. Results: The HPV-Screening protocol resulted in a relative increase of 60% in the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 2 or worse [risk ratio (RR) = 1.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.5–1.7], 40% in CIN grade 3 or worse (RR = 1.4, 95% CI = 1.3–1.6), 40% in cancer (RR = 1.4, 95% CI = 1.0–2.1), and 60% in colposcopy referrals (RR = 1.6, 95% CI = 1.5–1.6) compared with LBC-Screening. The performance of both protocols was age dependent, being more effective in women ages under 50 years. Conclusions: The HPV-Screening protocol was well accepted by women in Norway and detected more CIN2, CIN3, and cancers compared with the LBC-Screening protocol. Impact: A randomized implementation of the HPV-Screening protocol with real-world assessment enabled a gradual, quality assured, and safe technology transition. HPV-based screening protocol may further be improved by using HPV genotyping and age-specific referral algorithms.

The purpose of this study was to establish a gene signature that may predict CIN3 regression and that may aid in selecting patients who may safely refrain from conization. Oncomine mRNA data including 398 immune-related genes from 21 lesions with confirmed regression and 28 with persistent CIN3 were compared. L1000 mRNA data from a cervical cancer cohort was available for validation (n = 239). Transcriptomic analyses identified TDO2 (p = 0.004), CCL5 (p < 0.001), CCL3 (p = 0.04), CD38 (p = 0.02), and PRF1 (p = 0.005) as upregulated, and LCK downregulated (p = 0.01) in CIN3 regression as compared to persistent CIN3 lesions. From these, a gene signature predicting CIN3 regression with a sensitivity of 91% (AUC = 0.85) was established. Transcriptomic analyses revealed proliferation as significantly linked to persistent CIN3. Within the cancer cohort, high regression signature score associated with immune activation by Gene Set enrichment Analyses (GSEA) and immune cell infiltration by histopathological evaluation (p < 0.001). Low signature score was associated with poor survival (p = 0.007) and large tumors (p = 0.01). In conclusion, the proposed six-gene signature predicts CIN regression and favorable cervical cancer prognosis and points to common drivers in precursors and cervical cancer lesions.

Background HPV16/18 detection may improve cervical cancer risk stratification and better guide which HPV-positive women warrant immediate colposcopy/biopsy. We estimated risks of cervical precancer and cancer by HPV genotype and cytology during the implementation phase of primary HPV testing in Norway. Methods A total of 3111 women, aged 34–69 years, testing HPV-positive at baseline and undergoing cytology testing from February 2015 to April 2018 had data available for analysis. Risk estimates with 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or more severe (CIN3+) were estimated for cytology results and HPV genotypes (HPV16, HPV18, and other high-risk HPV). Results CIN3+ risks were higher for HPV16/18 than other high-risk HPV genotypes. Among women with any cytologic abnormality [atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or worse], immediate risks were 57.8% (95%CI = 53.0–62.6%) for HPV16, 40.2% (95%CI = 32.3–49.2%) for HPV18, and 31.4% (95%CI = 28.7–34.3%) for other high-risk HPV. Among those with normal cytology, CIN3+ risks were 19.9% (95%CI = 15.0–26.1%) for HPV16 positives, 10.8% (95%CI = 5.6–20.5%) for HPV18 positives, and 5.5% (95%CI = 4.2–7.1%) for other high-risk HPV. Conclusions The benefits and harms of managing women based on HPV positivity and cytology results can be better balanced by inclusion of HPV genotyping in screening and choosing more conservative management for other high-risk HPV compared to HPV16/18.

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and malignant melanoma are highly aggressive cancers that widely express the cell surface chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan 4 (CSPG4/NG2). CSPG4 plays an important role in tumor cell growth and survival and promotes chemo- and radiotherapy resistance, suggesting that CSPG4 is an attractive target in cancer therapy. In the present work, we applied the drug delivery technology photochemical internalization (PCI) in combination with the novel CSPG4-targeting immunotoxin 225.28-saporin as an efficient and specific strategy to kill aggressive TNBC and amelanotic melanoma cells. Light-activation of the clinically relevant photosensitizer TPCS2a (fimaporfin) and 225.28-saporin was found to act in a synergistic manner, and was superior to both PCI of saporin and PCI-no-drug (TPCS2a + light only) in three TNBC cell lines (MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-435 and SUM149) and two BRAFV600E mutated malignant melanoma cell lines (Melmet 1 and Melmet 5). The cytotoxic effect was highly dependent on the light dose and expression of CSPG4 since no enhanced cytotoxicity of PCI of 225.28-saporin compared to PCI of saporin was observed in the CSPG4-negative MCF-7 cells. The PCI of a smaller, and clinically relevant CSPG4-targeting toxin (scFvMEL-rGel) validated the CSPG4-targeting concept in vitro and induced a strong inhibition of tumor growth in the amelanotic melanoma xenograft A-375 model. In conclusion, the combination of the drug delivery technology PCI and CSPG4-targeting immunotoxins is an efficient, specific and light-controlled strategy for the elimination of aggressive cells of TNBC and malignant melanoma origin. This study lays the foundation for further preclinical evaluation of PCI in combination with CSPG4-targeting.

From 2015, Norway has implemented high-risk human papilloma virus (hrHPV) testing in primary screening for cervical cancer. Women aged 34-69 years, living in four counties, have been pseudo-randomly assigned (1:1 randomization) to either hrHPV testing every 5 years (followed by cytology if hrHPV is positive), or cytology testing every 3 years (followed by hrHPV testing if low-grade cytology is detected). We compared anxiety and depression scores among participants by screening arm and results. In total, 1,008 women answered a structured questionnaire that included the validated Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4). The Relative Risk Ratio (RRR) of mild vs. normal anxiety and depression scores, and moderate/severe vs. normal anxiety and depression scores, were estimated by multinomial logistic regression with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Compared to women who were screened with cytology, women randomized to hrHPV testing were not more likely to have mild anxiety and depression scores (RRR 0.96, CI 0.70-1.31) nor more likely to have moderate/severe anxiety and depression scores (RRR 1.14, CI 0.65-2.02). Women with five different combinations of abnormal screening test results were not more likely to have mild or moderate/severe vs. normal anxiety and depression scores than women with normal screening results. The likelihood of having abnormal long-term (4-24 months after the screening) anxiety or depression scores among women 34 years and older was not affected by screening method or screening results. The results of our study suggest that a change to hrHPV testing in primary screening would not increase psychological distress among participants.

Background: A comprehensive legal framework needs to be developed to run the health services and to regulate the information systems required to manage and to ensure the quality of cancer screening programmes. The aim of our study was to document and to compare the status of legal basis for cervical screening registration in European countries. Methods: An electronic questionnaire including questions on governance, decision-making structures and legal framework was developed. The primary responses were collected by September 2016. Results: We sent the questionnaire to representatives of 35 European countries (28 countries of the EU, with the United Kingdom included as 4 countries; 4 EFTA member countries: Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway, and Switzerland); responses were collected from 33 countries. The legal framework makes it possible to personally invite individuals in 29 countries (88%). Systematic screening registration in an electronic registry is legally enshrined in 23 countries (70%). Individual linkage of records between screening and cancer registries is allowed in 19 of those countries. Linkage studies involving cancer and screening registries have been conducted in 15 countries. Conclusion: Although the majority of EU/EFTA countries have implemented population-based screening, only half of them have successfully performed record linkage studies, which are nevertheless a key recommendation for quality assurance of the entire screening process. The European legislation is open to the possibility of using health data for these purposes; however, member states themselves must recognize the public interest to create a legal basis, which would enable all the necessary functions for high-quality cancer screening programmes.

In recent years, new treatment options for malignant melanoma patients have enhanced the overall survival for selected patients. Despite new hope, most melanoma patients still relapse with drug-resistant tumors or experience intrinsic resistance to the therapy. Therefore, novel treatment modalities beneficial for subgroups of patients are needed. TRAIL receptor agonists have been suggested as promising candidates for use in cancer treatment as they preferentially induce apoptosis in cancer cells. Unfortunately, the first generation of TRAIL receptor agonists showed poor clinical efficacy. hvTRA is a second-generation TRAIL receptor agonist with improved composition giving increased potency, and in the present study, we showed hvTRA-induced activation of apoptosis leading to an efficient and sustained reduction in melanoma cell growth in cell lines and xenograft models. Furthermore, the potential of hvTRA in a clinical setting was demonstrated by showing efficacy on tumor cells harvested from melanoma patients with lymph node metastasis in an ex vivo drug sensitivity assay. Inhibition of mutated BRAF has been shown to regulate proteins in the intrinsic apoptotic pathway, making the cells more susceptible for apoptosis induction. In an attempt to increase the efficacy of hvTRA, combination treatment with the mutated BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib was investigated. A synergistic effect by the combination was observed for several cell lines in vitro , and an initial cytotoxic effect was observed in vivo . Unfortunately, the initial increased reduction in tumor growth compared with hvTRA mono treatment was not sustained, and this was related to downregulation of the DR5 level by vemurafenib. Altogether, the presented data imply that hvTRA efficiently induce apoptosis and growth delay in melanoma models and patient material, and the potential of this TRAIL receptor agonist should be further evaluated for treatment of subgroups of melanoma patients.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing as primary screening for cervical cancer is currently being implemented in Norway in a randomized controlled fashion, involving three laboratories. As part of the quality assurance programme of the implementation, an evaluation of the inter-laboratory reproducibility of the HPV test was initiated, to ensure satisfactory HPV test reliability in all three laboratories.

Abstract Phenotypic heterogeneity of cancer cells can reason diversity in therapy responses within the same tumor, which might influence the overall efficacy of the treatment. Tumor stroma is an important contributor to intratumoral heterogeneity and can play a significant modulatory role in therapy response/resistance. Through studies on biological mechanisms of stroma-promoted resistance, novel targets could be identified for combination therapies aimed to eradicate both stroma-dependent and independent counterparts of the tumor. In this study we explore how the efficacy of the BRAF inhibitor (BRAFi) vemurafenib, a targeted agent commonly used against BRAF-mutant malignant melanoma, is modulated by stromal cells. By using multiple co-culture systems and experimental metastasis models, we showed that in the presence of lung fibroblasts, adjacent melanoma cells respond poorly to BRAFi. The protective influence of stroma was associated with stroma-induced changes in the melanoma cell phenotype, which was mapped by global gene expression and proteome analysis. We revealed that under the influence of fibroblasts, melanoma cells underwent a phenotype transition to the invasive, mesenchymal-like state characterized by down-regulation of melanocytic markers (MITF and its targets), up-regulation of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs)/RTK-linked signaling (like AXL or PDGFR activating down-stream PI3K) and elevation of extracellular-matrix fibronectin. We propose that these alterations allow melanoma cells to utilize alternative signaling pathways, like RTK-PI3K-mTOR instead of BRAF-driven MAPK, which reduces sensitivity to BRAFi. This scenario is further supported by the observations that: i) upon BRAFi treatment, stroma-protected melanoma maintained high levels of phospho-ribosomal protein S6 (pS6), a mTOR effector protein; ii) inhibition of mTOR or the upstream pathway PI3K together with BRAF eradicated pS6high subpopulations and enhanced the anti-proliferative effect in stroma-interacting melanoma; iii) the benefit of mTOR and BRAF co-inhibition was also seen in early-stage lung metastases in vivo. In conclusion, our findings signify the importance of stromal cells, specifically lung fibroblasts, in regulating melanoma cell phenotype and signaling, which impairs response to BRAFi. The stroma-induced invasive phenotype determinants that facilitate RTK-PI3K-mTOR signaling (e.g. AXL, PDGFR or fibronectin-binding integrins) could represent potential targets for overcoming stroma-mediated resistance to BRAFi. Currently, we are testing BRAFi in combination with several novel inhibitors of the identified RTKs and performing a cancer drug sensitivity screen to reveal the most effective drug combinations against stroma-interacting melanoma cells. Citation Format: Kotryna Seip, Karianne Giller Fleten, Anna Barkovskaya, Vigdis Nygaard, Mads Haugen Haugen, Birgit Øvstebø Engesæter, Gunhild Mari Mælandsmo, Lina Prasmickaite. Fibroblast-induced switching to the invasive phenotype and PI3K-mTOR signaling protects melanoma cells from BRAF inhibitors. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 927.

The knowledge on how tumor-associated stroma influences efficacy of anti-cancer therapy just started to emerge. Here we show that lung fibroblasts reduce melanoma sensitivity to the BRAF inhibitor (BRAFi) vemurafenib only if the two cell types are in close proximity. In the presence of fibroblasts, the adjacent melanoma cells acquire de-differentiated mesenchymal-like phenotype. Upon treatment with BRAFi, such melanoma cells maintain high levels of phospho ribosomal protein S6 (pS6), i.e. active mTOR signaling, which is suppressed in the BRAFi sensitive cells without stromal contacts. Inhibitors of PI3K/mTOR in combination with BRAFi eradicate pS6(high) cell subpopulations and potentiate anti-cancer effects in melanoma protected by the fibroblasts. mTOR and BRAF co-inhibition also delayed the development of early-stage lung metastases in vivo. In conclusion, we demonstrate that upon influence from fibroblasts, melanoma cells undergo a phenotype switch to the mesenchymal state, which can support PI3K/mTOR signaling. The lost sensitivity to BRAFi in such cells can be overcome by co-targeting PI3K/mTOR. This knowledge could be explored for designing BRAFi combination therapies aiming to eliminate both stroma-protected and non-protected counterparts of metastases.