Background: Hemodynamic-guided management with a pulmonary artery pressure sensor (CardioMEMS) is effective in reducing heart failure hospitalization in patients with chronic heart failure. This study aims to determine the feasibility and clinical utility of the CardioMEMS heart failure system to manage patients supported with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). Methods: In this multicenter prospective study, we followed patients with HeartMate II (n=52) or HeartMate 3 (n=49) LVADs and with CardioMEMS PA Sensors and measured pulmonary artery pressure, 6-minute walk distance, quality of life (EQ-5D-5 L scores), and heart failure hospitalization rates through 6 months. Patients were stratified as responders (R) and nonresponders to reductions in pulmonary artery diastolic pressure (PAD). Results: There were significant reductions in PAD from baseline to 6 months in R (21.5–16.5 mm Hg; P <0.001), compared with an increase in NR (18.0–20.3; P =0.002), and there was a significant increase in 6-minute walk distance among R (266 versus 322 meters; P =0.025) compared with no change in nonresponder. Patients who maintained PAD <20 compared with PAD ≥20 mm Hg for more than half the time throughout the study (averaging 15.6 versus 23.3 mm Hg) had a statistically significant lower rate of heart failure hospitalization (12.0% versus 38.9%; P =0.005). Conclusions: Patients with LVAD managed with CardioMEMS with a significant reduction in PAD at 6 months showed improvements in 6-minute walk distance. Maintaining PAD <20 mm Hg was associated with fewer heart failure hospitalizations. Hemodynamic-guided management of patients with LVAD with CardioMEMS is feasible and may result in functional and clinical benefits. Prospective evaluation of ambulatory hemodynamic management in patients with LVAD is warranted. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03247829.

An 82-year-old man with a HeartMate II left ventricular assist device presented with low-flow alarms and cardiogenic shock secondary to left ventricular assist device outflow graft obstruction. Given high risk for redo sternotomy, the heart team decided on percutaneous intervention with peripheral stents, a procedure that is currently limited to case reports. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.)

BACKGROUND:In-hospital ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is associated with a higher mortality rate than out-of-hospital STEMI. Quality measures and universal protocols for treatment of in-hospital STEMI do not exist, likely contributing to delays in recognition and treatment.HYPOTHESIS:To analyze differences in mortality among three subsets of patients who develop in-hospital STEMI.METHODS:This was a multicenter, retrospective observational study of patients who developed in-hospital STEMI at six United States medical centers between 2008 and 2017. Patients were stratified into three groups: (1) cardiac, (2) periprocedure, or (3) noncardiac/nonpostprocedure. Outcomes examined include time from electrocardiogram (ECG) acquisition to cardiac catheterization lab arrival (ECG-to-CCL) and survival to discharge.RESULTS:We identified 184 patients with in-hospital STEMI (mean age 68.7 years, 58.7% male). Group 1 (cardiac) patients had a shorter average ECG-to-CCL time (69 minutes) than group 2 (periprocedure, 215 minutes) and group 3 (noncardiac/nonpostprocedure, 199 minutes). Compared to group 1, survival to discharge was lower for group 2 (OR 0.33, P = .102) and group 3 (OR 0.20, P = .016). After adjusting for prespecified covariates, the relationship between group and survival showed a similar trend but did not reach statistical significance.CONCLUSIONS:Patients who develop in-hospital STEMI in the context of a preceding procedure or noncardiac illness appear to have longer reperfusion times and higher in-hospital mortality than patients admitted with cardiac diagnoses. Larger studies are warranted to further investigate these observations. Health systems should place an increased emphasis on developing quality metrics and implementing quality improvement initiatives to improve outcomes for in-hospital STEMI.

Pheochromocytomas are rare neuroendocrine tumors. They can present with signs of catecholamine excess, multi organ failure and features of stress induced (Takotsubo) cardiomyopathy. A 34-year-old female presented to urgent care for chest and abdominal pain following exercise. After transfer to the

Background: The United States has recently undergone increases in the legalization and use of marijuana. There have been previous reports on the association of cannabis use and myocardial dysfunction, however, few on the association with acute stress cardiomyopathy and cardiogenic shock. Case Report: This is a case of a 58-year-old female with a history of inhaled cannabis use, no history of diabetes, and no known history of cardiac disease, that illustrates an association between cannabis use and the recurrent development of stress cardiomyopathy and cardiogenic shock. A review of medical records was performed from two hospitalizations and subsequent outpatient follow-up for similar presentations 6 years apart and review of literature regarding cannabis use and its association with cardiac dysfunction. In separate hospitalizations, the patient presentedwith clinical findings of cardiogenic shock, severe left ventricular dysfunction with morphologic features of stress cardiomyopathy, and normal coronary angiography. Laboratory results included elevated cardiac biomarkers and urine tetrahydrocannabinol levels > 300 ng/mL. The patient required intensive cardiovascular support, but recovered with normal cardiac function after each event. Why Should an Emergency Physician Be Aware of This?: As use of cannabis becomes more prevalent, it will be important for physicians to recognize the potential association of cannabis use and acute myocardial dysfunction, and how early treatment may contribute to salutary outcomes. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mitral regurgitation commonly improves after implantation of a left ventricular assist device without concomitant valvular repair owing to the mechanical unloading of the left ventricle. However, the development (or persistence) of significant mitral regurgitation after implantation of a left ventricular assist device is associated with adverse clinical events. We present a case of a left ventricular assist device patient who successfully underwent a percutaneous MitraClip procedure for repair of persistent late postoperative mitral insufficiency with demonstrable clinical and hemodynamic improvement. (C) 2018 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

Importance In-hospital ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a unique clinical entity with epidemiology, incidence, and outcomes distinct from that of out-of-hospital STEMI and has only within the past 10 years begun to receive increased attention and research. Patients with in-hospital STEMI are older, have more comorbidities, and more frequently have coagulopathies and contraindications for anticoagulation and fibrinolytic therapy. A standardized clinical definition of in-hospital STEMI is lacking. The objectives of this special communication are to (1) summarize the knowledge base regarding in-hospital STEMI; (2) review the challenges of diagnosis and treatment of patients with in-hospital STEMI; (3) present a standardized clinical definition for in-hospital STEMI; and (4) provide a quality improvement protocol to improve diagnosis, triage, and treatment of patients with in-hospital STEMI. Observations Patients with in-hospital STEMI less frequently present with typical angina symptoms, and an electrocardiogram is often obtained owing to changes in clinical status, changes on telemetry, or a finding of elevated cardiac biomarker. The frequent nontypical presentations often lead to substantial delays in the diagnosis of STEMI. Only 34% to 71% of patients with in-hospital STEMI undergo diagnostic catheterization, and only 22% to 56% undergo percutaneous coronary intervention. Even in contemporary reports, some studies report in-hospital mortality in the range of 31% to 42%. Three areas of delay in the treatment of patients with in-hospital STEMI that merit particular attention are (1) delays in electrocardiogram acquisition, (2) delays in electrocardiogram interpretation, and (3) delays in activation of existing STEMI systems of care. Conclusions and Relevance Treatment of patients with in-hospital STEMI is more complex and challenging than treatment of patients who develop out-of-hospital STEMI, leading to delays in diagnosis and triage and less frequent use of reperfusion therapy. Quality improvement programs targeted at decreasing delays and streamlining treatment of such patients may improve treatment and outcome.

More than 1 million heart failure hospitalizations occur annually, and congestion is the predominant cause. Rehospitalizations for recurrent congestion portend poor outcomes independently of age and renal function. Persistent congestion trumps serum creatinine increases in predicting adverse heart failure outcomes. No decongestive pharmacological therapy has reduced these harmful consequences. Simplified ultrafiltration devices permit fluid removal in lower-acuity hospital settings, but with conflicting results regarding safety and efficacy. Ultrafiltration performed at fixed rates after onset of therapy-induced increased serum creatinine was not superior to standard care and resulted in more complications. In contrast, compared with diuretic agents, some data suggest that adjustment of ultrafiltration rates to patients' vital signs and renal function may be associated with more effective decongestion and fewer heart failure events. Essential aspects of ultrafiltration remain poorly defined. Further research is urgently needed, given the burden of congestion and data suggesting sustained benefits of early and adjustable ultrafiltration.

OBJECTIVES:Without early revascularization, both inpatient and outpatient STEMIs have poor outcomes. Reasons for denying PCI for STEMI, however, remain uncertain. This single-center retrospective cohort study compares factors and outcomes associated with ineligibility for PCI between inpatients and outpatients following ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS:A total of 1,759 STEMI patients between June 2009 and January 2015 were assessed. Individual medical records were reviewed to obtain reasons for PCI ineligibility for STEMI patients who did not receive reperfusion therapy. RESULTS:Compared to outpatients with STEMI (n = 1,688), inpatients (n = 71) were less likely to receive coronary angiography (60.6% vs 95.9%; P < 0.001) or PCI (50.7% vs 80.9%; P < 0.001), with longer ECG/door to first device activation times (97 [78, 131] vs 63 [49, 78] minutes; P < 0.001). When coronary angiography was performed, however, similar rates of PCI and procedural success were seen in both groups. Principal contraindication for PCI was risk of bleeding within the inpatient population and complex coronary artery disease within the outpatient population. Total in-hospital mortality was higher in inpatient STEMIs compared to outpatients (42.2% vs 10.0%; P < 0.001), but lower for patients eligible for PCI in both groups. CONCLUSIONS:Reasons for PCI ineligibility differ between inpatient and outpatient STEMIs. Inpatients have increased risks of bleeding, lower coronary angiography and PCI use, and higher in-hospital mortality. Especially for inpatients, specific PCI STEMI protocols that anticipate and overcome types of ineligibility and delay for cardiac catheterization may improve outcomes.

Timely reperfusion therapy reduces complications and improves survival in ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). An effective chain of survival has been established for STEMIs occur in the community (outpatient STEMI). Recent studies have identified a subgroup of patients who develop STEMI while hospitalized for primary conditions, often not directly related to coronary artery disease (in-hospital STEMI or inpatient STEMI). This article summarizes current understanding of patient demographics, clinical characteristics, care delivery system and outcomes of in-hospital STEMI, comparing with outpatient STEMI. We also identified opportunities for quality improvement and proposed strategies and future directions to improve care for these patients.

Background Sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase (SERCA2a) activity is deficient in the failing heart. Correction of this abnormality by gene transfer might improve cardiac function. We aimed to investigate the clinical benefits and safety of gene therapy through infusion of adeno-associated virus 1 (AAV1)/SERCA2a in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction.Methods We did this randomised, multinational, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b trial at 67 clinical centres and hospitals in the USA, Europe, and Israel. High-risk ambulatory patients with New York Heart Association class II-IV symptoms of heart failure and a left ventricular ejection fraction of 0.35 or less due to an ischaemic or non-ischaemic cause were randomly assigned (1: 1), via an interactive voice and web-response system, to receive a single intracoronary infusion of 1 x 10(13) DNase-resistant particles of AAV1/SERCA2a or placebo. Randomisation was stratified by country and by 6 min walk test distance. All patients, physicians, and outcome assessors were masked to treatment assignment. The primary efficacy endpoint was time to recurrent events, defined as hospital admission because of heart failure or ambulatory treatment for worsening heart failure. Primary efficacy endpoint analyses and safety analyses were done by modified intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01643330.Findings Between July 9, 2012, and Feb 5, 2014, we randomly assigned 250 patients to receive either AAV1/SERCA2a (n= 123) or placebo (n= 127); 243 (97%) patients comprised the modified intention-to-treat population. Patients were followed up for at least 12 months; median follow-up was 17.5 months (range 1.8-29.4 months). AAV1/SERCA2a did not improve time to recurrent events compared with placebo (104 vs 128 events; hazard ratio 0.93, 95% CI 0.53-1.65; p= 0.81). No safety signals were noted. 20 (16%) patients died in the placebo group and 25 (21%) patients died in the AAV1/SERCA2a group; 18 and 22 deaths, respectively, were adjudicated as being due to cardiovascular causes.Interpretation CUPID 2 is the largest gene transfer study done in patients with heart failure so far. Despite promising results from previous studies, AAV1/SERCA2a at the dose tested did not improve the clinical course of patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. Although we did not find evidence of improved outcomes at the dose of AAV1/SERCA2a studied, our findings should stimulate further research into the use of gene therapy to treat patients with heart failure and help inform the design of future gene therapy trials.

BACKGROUND:In patients hospitalized with acutely decompensated heart failure, unresolved signs and symptoms of fluid overload have been consistently associated with poor outcomes. Regardless of dosing and type of administration, intravenous loop diuretics have not reduced heart failure events or mortality in patients with acutely decompensated heart failure. The results of trials comparing intravenous loop diuretics to mechanical fluid removal by isolated venovenous ultrafiltration have yielded conflicting results. Studies evaluating early decongestive strategies have shown that ultrafiltration removed more fluid and was associated with fewer heart failure-related rehospitalization than intravenous loop diuretics. In contrast, when used in the setting of worsening renal function, ultrafiltration was associated with poorer renal outcomes and no reduction in heart failure events.METHODS:The AVOID-HF trial seeks to determine if an early strategy of ultrafiltration in patients with acutely decompensated heart failure is associated with fewer heart failure events at 90 days compared with a strategy based on intravenous loop diuretics. Study subjects from 40 highly experienced institutions are randomized to either early ultrafiltration or intravenous loop diuretics. In both treatment arms, fluid removal therapies are adjusted according to the patients' hemodynamic condition and renal function. The study was unilaterally terminated by the sponsor in the absence of futility and safety concerns after the enrollment of 221 subjects, or 27% of the originally planned sample size of 810 patients.CONCLUSIONS:The AVOID-HF trial's principal aim is to compare the safety and efficacy of ultrafiltration vs that of intravenous loop diuretics in patients hospitalized with acutely decompensated heart failure. Because stepped treatment approaches are applied in both ultrafiltration and intravenous loop diuretics groups and the primary end point is time to first heart failure event within 90 days, it is hoped that the AVOID-HF trial, despite its untimely termination by the sponsor, will provide further insight on how to optimally decongest patients with fluid-overloaded heart failure.

Despite use of optimised guideline-directed therapies, heart failure (HF) patients often experience worsening of their condition, recurrent hospitalizations and premature mortality. Molecular studies have identified that a deficiency in the sarco-endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ ATPase 2a (SERCA2a) enzyme in cardiomyocytes impairs cardiac relaxation and contractility. In animal models of HF, increasing SERCA2a expression by genetic enzyme replacement therapy improves cardiac function and survival. In patients, the phase 2a CUPID 1 trial reported that SERCA2a enzyme replacement with a novel recombinant adeno-associated viral vector containing human SERCA2a cDNA (AAV1/SERCA2a) promoted reverse left ventricular remodelling and improved symptoms, functionality and the clinical course.

Background Heart failure is a common cause of hospitalization and can be divided into types with preserved and reduced ejection fraction (HFpEF and HFrEF, respectively). In this subanalysis of the HABIT (Heart Failure Assessment With BNP in the Home) trial, we examined the differences between home B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) testing and weight monitoring in patients with HFpEF and with HFrEF before decompensation. Methods and Results This was a retrospective review of patients with HFpEF and HFrEF from the HABIT trial. The HFpEF patients compared with HFrEF patients were older and more obese and had lower baseline BNP values. Intra-individual BNP dispersion (spread of distribution over time) was greater in HFpEF than in HFrEF owing to rapid fluctuations (within 3 days). Slowly varying changes in BNP (estimated by a moving average) were equally predictive of ADHF risk in both HFpEF and HFrEF. However, in HFpEF, a rapid rise in BNP >200 pg/mL within 3 days was associated with an increased risk of acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF; hazard ratio 4.0), whereas a similar association was not observed in HFrEF. Weight gain ≥5 lb in 3 days had a high specificity but low sensitivity for ADHF in both HFpEF and HFrEF, whereas a lower threshold of ≥2 lb weight gain over 3 days in patients with HFpEF (but not HFrEF) was a moderately sensitive cutoff associated with decompensation (60% sensitivity). Conclusions Patients with HFpEF and HFrEF have variations in their BNP and weight before decompensation. The rapid time scale behaves differently between the groups. In those with HFpEF, a 3-day period characterized by ≥2 lb weight gain and/or >200 pg/mL BNP rise was significantly associated with decompensation. Future prospective studies investigating different weight and BNP cutoffs for home monitoring of HFpEF and HFrEF patients should be performed to fully learn the value of BNP changes before clinical deompensation.

OBJECTIVES:This study was a multicenter, single-arm, double-blinded observational prospective clinical trial designed to monitor daily concentrations of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and to determine how these concentrations correlate with acute clinical heart failure decompensation (ADHF) and related adverse clinical outcomes in at-risk HF patients. BACKGROUND:Although BNP at discharge is predictive of 30-day outcomes, outpatient serial testing may improve the risk of detecting early decompensation. METHODS:A total of 163 patients with HF signs and symptoms of ADHF discharged from the hospital or in an outpatient setting measured their weight and BNP levels daily for 60 days with a finger-stick test. Patients and physicians were blinded to BNP levels. The composite outcome was ADHF events: cardiovascular death, admission for decompensated HF, or clinical HF decompensation requiring either parenteral HF therapy or changes in oral HF medications. RESULTS:A total of 6,934 daily BNP values were recorded, with a median of 46 measures per patient over a monitoring period of 65 days. Forty patients had 56 events. Correlations between BNP measures weakened over time, and the dispersion between BNP measures grew. During 10,035 patient-days, there were 494 (4.9%) days of weight gain (≥5 lbs). The hazard ratio per unit increase of ln BNP was 1.84, and the hazard ratio on a day of weight gain was 3.63. These effects retained significance when controlling for symptoms. When the monitoring period for each subject was broken into intervals based on ADHF events, there were 39 (18.4%) intervals of upward trending BNP corresponding to a risk increase of 59.8% and 64 (30.2%) downward trending intervals corresponding to a risk decrease of 39.0%. There were 94 (44.3%) intervals with 1 or more days of weight gain corresponding to a risk increase of 26.1%. CONCLUSIONS:This pilot study demonstrates that home BNP testing is feasible and that trials using home monitoring for guiding therapy are justifiable in high-risk patients. Daily weight monitoring is complementary to BNP, but BNP changes correspond to larger changes in risk, both upward and downward. (Heart Failure [HF] Assessment with B-type Natriuretic Peptide [BNP] In the Home [HABIT]; NCT00946231).

with refractory Stage D heart failure. Methods and Materials: MEDAMACS (n 168) enrolled adult patients with CHF on optimal therapy, LVEF 30%, and 2 hospitalizations in the past year or 1 hospitalization and 1 high risk feature. Echo-determined severity of TR (none, mild, moderate, severe) was reported in 166 of 168 patients. With an endpoint of survival free of inotrope dependence, mechanical circulatory support (MCS), or heart transplantation, we tested the predictive value of at least moderate TR in adjusted analyses. Results: Moderate TR was present in 30% and severe TR in 15% of the study cohort. The presence of greater than moderate TR was associated with right atrial pressure (p 0.0006), pulmonary artery mean pressure (p 0.03), TR velocity (p 0.01), inspiratory collapse of the inferior vena cava (p 0.01), RVD(p 0.04), peripheral edema (p 0.0003), hepatosplenomegaly (p 0.01), low platelets (p 0.05), and total bilirubin (p 0.03). Over a mean follow-up of 154 days, 64 events were recorded including long term inotropic support (9), MCS (16), cardiac transplantation (17), and mortality (22). In univariate analysis, at least moderateTR was associated with increased risk (OR 3.1; 95% CI 1.6, 6.0; p 0.0006). After multivariate adjustment, tricuspid regurgitation remained independently associated with survival free of transplant, MCS, or inotropic dependence (OR 3.5; 95% CI 1.5, 8.6; p 0.004). Conclusions: Tricuspid regurgitation is common and carries prognostic import in Stage D Heart Failure. Given the importance of TR when considering left ventricular assist device support, future studies should investigate the reversibility of this lesion.