BACKGROUND:Parkinson's disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder. Neurotrophic therapeutic approaches have been limited in part by incomplete delivery to the putamen. We developed image-guided convection-enhanced delivery with real-time monitoring to improve intraputaminal distribution of neurotrophic gene therapy. OBJECTIVES:To evaluate the 5-year safety and tolerability of bilateral putaminal delivery of adeno-associated virus serotype 2 encoding glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (AAV2-GDNF), and to describe exploratory long-term clinical outcomes. METHODS:This was a single-center, open-label, phase 1, dose-escalation study in adults with advanced PD. Thirteen participants received bilateral putaminal infusions across three dose cohorts (six low-dose, six medium-dose, one high-dose) and were followed for 5 years. Adverse events, including serious adverse events, were collected, and their relationship to the study agent was determined. Longitudinal clinical outcomes were analyzed with a mixed-effects model. RESULTS:Across follow-up, 562 adverse events were recorded; 45 were considered possibly or probably related to the study drug. The 13 serious adverse events that occurred were not attributed to the study drug. One participant died 45 months after infusion from aspiration pneumonia following cervical spine surgery at an outside institution. The study drug had a mean putaminal coverage of 26% ± 10%. Exploratory clinical measures did not change significantly between baseline and final follow-up. CONCLUSIONS:Bilateral putaminal neurotrophic gene therapy delivered with real-time image guidance was well tolerated over 5 years, without protocol-defined stopping events. © 2026 The Author(s). Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society. This article has been contributed to by U.S. Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.
BACKGROUND:Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder that affects both motor and cognitive functions, particularly working memory (WM). Machine learning offers an advantage for decoding complex brain activity patterns, but its application to task-based functional magnetic resonance imaging (task-based fMRI) has been limited. This study aimed to develop an explainable machine learning model to classify WM performance levels in PD based on task-based fMRI data. METHODS:We enrolled 45 patients with PD and 15 healthy controls (HCs), all of whom performed an n-back WM task in an MRI scanner. Patients were stratified into three subgroups based on their 3-back task performance: better, intermediate, and worse WM. A three-dimensional convolutional neural network (3D-CNN) model, pre-trained with a 3D convolutional autoencoder, was developed to perform binary classifications between group pairs. RESULTS:The model achieved an accuracy of 93.3% in discriminating task-based fMRI images of PD patients with worse WM from HCs, surpassing the mean accuracy of three expert radiologists (70.0%). Saliency maps identified brain regions influencing the model's decisions, including the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and superior/inferior parietal lobules. These regions were consistent with both the areas with intergroup differences in the task-based fMRI data and the anatomical areas that are crucial for better WM performance. CONCLUSIONS:We developed an explainable deep learning model that is capable of classifying WM performance levels in PD using task-based fMRI. This approach may enhance the objective and interpretable assessment of brain function in clinical neuroimaging practice.
OBJECTIVE:Gene therapy by convection-enhanced delivery of type 2 adeno-associated virus-glial cell derived neurotrophic factor (AAV2-GDNF) to the bilateral putamina seeks to increase GDNF gene expression and treat Parkinson's disease (PD). METHODS:A 63-year-old man with advanced PD received AAV2-GDNF in a clinical trial. He died from pneumonia after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion 45 months later. An autopsy included brain examination for GDNF transgene expression. Putaminal catecholamine concentrations were compared to in vivo 18F-Fluorodopa (18F-FDOPA) positron emission tomography (PET) scanning results before and 18 months after AAV2-GDNF infusion. RESULTS:Parkinsonian progression stabilized clinically. Postmortem neuropathology confirmed PD. Bilateral putaminal regions previously infused with AAV2-GDNF expressed the GDNF gene. Total putaminal dopamine was 1% of control, confirming the striatal dopaminergic deficiency suggested by baseline 18F-DOPA-PET scanning. Putaminal regions responded as expected to AAV2-GDNF. CONCLUSION:After AAV2-GDNF infusion, infused putaminal regions showed increased GDNF gene expression, tyrosine hydroxylase immunoreactive sprouting, catechol levels, and 18F-FDOPA-PET signal, suggesting the regenerative potential of AAV2-GDNF in PD.
To assess inpatient and emergency department (ED) epidemiology and healthcare disparities in functional neurological disorder (FND) in adults and children.
Background and ObjectivesRepresentation of persons from marginalized racial and ethnic groups in Parkinson disease (PD) trials has been low, limiting the generalizability of therapeutic options for individuals with PD. Two large phase 3 randomized clinical trials sponsored by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), STEADY-PD III and SURE-PD3, screened participants from overlapping Parkinson Study Group clinical sites under similar eligibility criteria but differed in participation by underrepresented minorities. The goal of this research is to compare recruitment strategies of PD participants belonging to marginalized racial and ethnic groups.MethodsA total of 998 participants with identified race and ethnicity consented to STEADY-PD III and SURE-PD3 from 86 clinical sites. Demographics, clinical trial characteristics, and recruitment strategies were compared. NINDS imposed a minority recruitment mandate on STEADY-PD III but not SURE-PD3.ResultsTen percent of participants who consented to STEADY-PD III self-identified as belonging to marginalized racial and ethnic groups compared to 6.5% in SURE-PD3 (difference = 3.9%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.4%-7.5%, p value = 0.034). This difference persisted after screening (10.1% of patients in STEADY-PD III vs 5.4% in SURE-PD 3, difference = 4.7%, 95% CI 0.6%-8.8%, p value = 0.038).DiscussionAlthough both trials targeted similar participants, STEADY-PD III was able to consent and recruit a higher percentage of patients from racial and ethnic marginalized groups. Possible reasons include differential incentives for achieving minority recruitment goals.
Abstract Background and Objectives Ethanol has been reported to improve tremor severity in approximately two thirds of patients with essential tremor (ET), but the accuracy of that proportion is not certain and the mechanism of action is unknown. The goal of this study was to investigate alcohol response on tremor by applying an a priori objective response definition and subsequently to describe the responder rate to a standardized ethanol dose in a cohort of 85 ET patients. A secondary analysis evaluated other tremor and nontremor features, including demographics, tremor intensity, breath alcohol concentration, nontremor effects of alcohol, self‐reported responder status to ethanol, and prior ethanol exposure. Methods This was a prospective, open‐label, single‐dose challenge of oral ethanol during which motor and nonmotor measurements were obtained starting immediately prior to ethanol administration and subsequently every 20 min for 120 min. We defined tremor reduction as a 35% decline in power in the patient's tremor frequency recorded during spiral drawing 60 min after ethanol administration. Results In total, 80% of patients were considered alcohol responsive using our objective definition. Responder status and change in the objective tremor metrics were significantly correlated with the change in breath alcohol concentration levels after ethanol administration, but no other relationships to nontremor metrics were found. Discussion A high percentage of patients actually respond to acute ethanol. However, their self‐reported response does not correlate well with their objective response. Objective response correlates with breath alcohol level but not with sedation, indicating a specific effect of ethanol on tremor.
Background and Objectives Representation of persons from marginalized racial and ethnic groups in Parkinson disease (PD) trials has been low, limiting the generalizability of therapeutic options for individuals with PD. Two large phase 3 randomized clinical trials sponsored by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), STEADY-PD III and SURE-PD3, screened participants from overlapping Parkinson Study Group clinical sites under similar eligibility criteria but differed in participation by underrepresented minorities. The goal of this research is to compare recruitment strategies of PD participants belonging to marginalized racial and ethnic groups. Methods A total of 998 participants with identified race and ethnicity consented to STEADY-PD III and SURE-PD3 from 86 clinical sites. Demographics, clinical trial characteristics, and recruitment strategies were compared. NINDS imposed a minority recruitment mandate on STEADY-PD III but not SURE-PD3. Results Ten percent of participants who consented to STEADY-PD III self-identified as belonging to marginalized racial and ethnic groups compared to 6.5% in SURE-PD3 (difference = 3.9%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.4%–7.5%, p value = 0.034). This difference persisted after screening (10.1% of patients in STEADY-PD III vs 5.4% in SURE-PD 3, difference = 4.7%, 95% CI 0.6%–8.8%, p value = 0.038). Discussion Although both trials targeted similar participants, STEADY-PD III was able to consent and recruit a higher percentage of patients from racial and ethnic marginalized groups. Possible reasons include differential incentives for achieving minority recruitment goals. Trial Registration Information This study used data from The Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy Assessment of Isradipine for Parkinson Disease (STEADY-PD III; NCT02168842) and the Study of Urate Elevation in Parkinson’s Disease (SURE-PD3; NCT02642393).
BACKGROUND:Parkinson's disease (PD) is associated with gait and visuomotor abnormalities, but it is not clear where PD patients look during ambulation. OBJECTIVE:We sought to characterize the visual areas of interest explored by PD patients, with and without freezing of gait (FOG), compared to healthy volunteers (HVs). METHODS:Using an eye-tracking device, we compared visual fixation patterns in 17 HVs and 18 PD patients, with and without FOG, during an ambulatory and a nonambulatory, computer-based task. RESULTS:During ambulation, PD patients with FOG fixated more on proximal areas of the ground and less on the target destination. PD patients without FOG displayed a fixation pattern more similar to that of HVs. Similar patterns were observed during the nonambulatory, computer-based task. CONCLUSIONS:Our findings suggest increased dependence on visual feedback from nearby areas in the environment in PD patients with FOG, even in the absence of motor demands. © 2022 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
Working memory (WM) impairment is one of the most frequent cognitive deficits in Parkinson's disease (PD). However, it is not known how neural activity is altered and compensatory responses eventually fail during progression. We aimed to elucidate neural correlates of WM and compensatory mechanisms in PD. Eighteen cognitively normal PD patients (PD-CogNL), 16 with PD with mild cognitive impairment (PD-MCI), 11 with PD with dementia (PDD), and 17 healthy controls (HCs) were evaluated. Subjects performed an n-back task. Functional MRI data were analyzed by event-related analysis for correct responses. Brain activations were evaluated by comparing them to fixation cross or 0-back task, and correlated with n-back task performance. When compared to fixation cross, PD-CogNL patients had more activation in WM areas than HCs for both the 2- and 3-back tasks. PD-MCI and PDD patients had more activation in WM areas than HCs for the 0- and 1-back task. 2-back task performance was correlated with brain activations (vs. 0-back task) in the bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and frontal eye field (FEF) and left rostral prefrontal cortex, caudate nucleus, inferior/superior parietal lobule (IPL/SPL), and anterior insular cortex as well as anterior cingulate cortex. 3-back task performance was correlated with brain activations (vs. 0-back task) in the left FEF, right caudate nucleus, and bilateral IPL/SPL. Additional activations on top of the 0-back task, rather than fixation cross, are the neural correlates of WM. Our results suggest PD patients have two types of compensatory mechanisms: (1) Hyperactivation for different WM load tasks depending on their cognitive status. PD-CogNL have hyperactivation for moderate and heavy working memory load tasks while maintaining normal working memory performance. In contrast, PD-MCI and PDD have hyperactivation for control task and light working memory load task, leaving less neural resources to further activate for more demanding tasks and resulting in impaired working memory performance. (2) Bilateral recruitment of WM-related areas, in particular the DLPFC, FEF, IPL/SPL and caudate nucleus, to improve WM performance.
Background Botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) injection is an established therapy for limb spasticity and focal limb dystonia. Comparative benefits of injection guidance procedures have not been rigorously studied. Objectives We compared 2 targeting techniques for onabotulinumtoxin-A (onabotA) injection for the treatment of focal hand dystonia and upper limb spasticity: electrophysiologic guidance using electrical stimulation (E-stim) and ultrasound (US). Methods This was a 2-center, randomized, crossover, assessor-blinded trial. Participants with focal hand dystonia or upper limb spasticity, on stable onabotA therapy for at least 2 previous injection cycles, were randomly assigned to either E-stim or US with crossover at 3 months. The primary outcome was improvement in dystonia or spasticity severity on a visual analog scale (VAS; 0-100) measured 1 month after each injection. The secondary outcome was participant discomfort assessed on a VAS. Repeated-measures analysis of covariance was used with linear mixed-model covariate selection. Results A total of 19 participants (13 men) completed the study, 10 with upper limb spasticity and 9 with dystonia. Benefit was equivalent between the 2 techniques (VAS least-square mean [LSmean] 51.5 mm with US and 53.1 with E-stim). E-stim was perceived as more uncomfortable by participants (VAS LSmean 34.5 vs. 19.9 for E-stim and US, respectively). Procedure duration was similar with the 2 procedures. There were no serious adverse events related to either approach. Conclusions US and E-Stim localization guidance techniques provide equivalent efficacy in onabotA injections for spasticity and dystonia. US guidance injections are more comfortable for participants. Both techniques are effective guidance methods, with US potentially preferable based on participant comfort.
Background To date, no medication has slowed the progression of Parkinson’s disease (PD). Preclinical, epidemiological, and experimental data on humans all support many benefits of endurance exercise among persons with PD. The key question is whether there is a definitive additional benefit of exercising at high intensity, in terms of slowing disease progression, beyond the well-documented benefit of endurance training on a treadmill for fitness, gait, and functional mobility. This study will determine the efficacy of high-intensity endurance exercise as first-line therapy for persons diagnosed with PD within 3 years, and untreated with symptomatic therapy at baseline. Methods This is a multicenter, randomized, evaluator-blinded study of endurance exercise training. The exercise intervention will be delivered by treadmill at 2 doses over 18 months: moderate intensity (4 days/week for 30 min per session at 60–65% maximum heart rate) and high intensity (4 days/week for 30 min per session at 80–85% maximum heart rate). We will randomize 370 participants and follow them at multiple time points for 24 months. The primary outcome is the Movement Disorders Society-Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) motor score (Part III) with the primary analysis assessing the change in MDS-UPDRS motor score (Part III) over 12 months, or until initiation of symptomatic antiparkinsonian treatment if before 12 months. Secondary outcomes are striatal dopamine transporter binding, 6-min walk distance, number of daily steps, cognitive function, physical fitness, quality of life, time to initiate dopaminergic medication, circulating levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). Tertiary outcomes are walking stride length and turning velocity. Discussion SPARX3 is a Phase 3 clinical trial designed to determine the efficacy of high-intensity, endurance treadmill exercise to slow the progression of PD as measured by the MDS-UPDRS motor score. Establishing whether high-intensity endurance treadmill exercise can slow the progression of PD would mark a significant breakthrough in treating PD. It would have a meaningful impact on the quality of life of people with PD, their caregivers and public health. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04284436. Registered on February 25, 2020.
ObjectiveTo assess the safety and efficacy of inebilizumab in patients with anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis.BackgroundThe lack of approved therapies for NMDAR encephalitis has led to substantial variability in treatment. High-quality data is needed to guide treatment and optimize long-term outcomes in recovering patients. Inebilizumab is a humanized anti-CD19 monoclonal antibody that can be administered intravenously with good CSF penetration and high target engagement. Inebilizumab may be an efficacious treatment for NMDAR encephalitis, with the potential to achieve early robust and sustained suppression of NMDAR autoantibodies and CD19+ plasmablasts and plasma cells leading to better long-term outcomes.Design/MethodsThe ExTINGUISH trial is a Phase 2B randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of inebilizumab 300 mg for the acute treatment of moderate-to-severe NMDAR encephalitis. 120 participants will be enrolled at 20 US and two European sites (Barcelona, Spain; Rotterdam, The Netherlands). All patients will receive standard "first-line" immunotherapies prior to randomization. Cyclophosphamide IV rescue therapy will be provided after 6 weeks to patients who fail to respond to initial treatment. Motor, cognitive, and functional outcomes will be assessed over 96 weeks. Study operations will be supported via the NINDS-supported NeuroNEXT infrastructure.ResultsPrimary outcomes will be ascertained at 16 weeks using the change in modified Rankin scale (adjusted for rescue therapy) and accepted safety measures. Comprehensive neuropsychological tests, bedside cognitive screening tools, and quality of life/ functional indices will be measured across study participation (secondary outcomes). Clinical data will be combined with biofluid biomarkers of immune activation to inform the biologic contributors to outcomes and identify surrogate endpoints that may be used in future clinical trials (tertiary outcomes).ConclusionsExTINGUISH Trial findings will immediately influence patient care, while informing the design and implementation of future clinical trials in autoimmune encephalitis.
Direct putaminal infusion of adeno-associated virus vector (serotype 2) (AAV2) containing the human glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) transgene was studied in a phase I clinical trial of participants with advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). Convection-enhanced delivery of AAV2-GDNF with a surrogate imaging tracer (gadoteridol) was used to track infusate distribution during real-time intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI). Pre-, intra-, and serial postoperative (up to 5 years after infusion) MRI were analyzed in 13 participants with PD treated with bilateral putaminal co-infusions (52 infusions in total) of AAV2-GDNF and gadoteridol (infusion volume, 450 mL per putamen). Real-time iMRI confirmed infusion cannula placement, anatomic quantification of volumetric perfusion within the putamen, and direct visualization of off-target leakage or cannula reflux (which permitted corresponding infusion rate/cannula adjustments). Serial post-treatment MRI assessment (n = 13) demonstrated no evidence of cerebral parenchyma toxicity in the corresponding regions of AAV2-GDNF and gadoteridol co-infusion or surrounding regions over long-term follow-up. Direct confirmation of key intraoperative safety and efficacy parameters underscores the safety and tissue targeting value of real-time imaging with co-infused gadoteridol and putative therapeutic agents (i.e., AAV2-GDNF). This delivery-imaging platform enhances safety, permits delivery personalization, improves therapeutic distribution, and facilitates assessment of efficacy and dosing effect.
Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients with postural instability and gait disorder phenotype (PIGD) are at high risk of cognitive deficits compared to those with tremor dominant phenotype (TD). Alterations of white matter (WM) integrity can occur in patients with normal cognitive functions (PD-N). However, the alterations of WM integrity related to cognitive functions in PD-N, especially in these two motor phenotypes, remain unclear. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is a non-invasive neuroimaging method to evaluate WM properties and by applying DTI tractography, one can identify WM tracts connecting functional regions. Here, we 1) compared the executive function (EF) in PIGD phenotype with normal cognitive functions (PIGD-N) and TD phenotype with normal cognitive functions (TD-N) phenotypes; 2) used DTI tractography to evaluated differences in WM alterations between these two phenotypes within a task-based functional network; and 3) examined the WM integrity alterations related to EF in a whole brain network for PD-N patients regardless of phenotypes. Thirty-four idiopathic PD-N patients were classified into two groups based on phenotypes: TD-N and PIGD-N, using an algorithm based on UPDRS part III. Neuropsychological tests were used to evaluate patients’ EF, including the Trail making test part A and B, the Stroop color naming, the Stroop word naming, the Stroop color-word interference task, as well as the FAS verbal fluency task and the animal category fluency tasks. DTI measures were calculated among WM regions associated with the verbal fluency network defined from previous task fMRI studies, and compared between PIGD-N and TD-N groups. In addition, the relationship of DTI measures and verbal fluency scores were evaluated for our full cohort of PD-N patients within the whole brain network. These values were also correlated with the scores of the FAS verbal fluency task. Only the FAS verbal fluency test showed significant group differences, having lower scores in PIGD-N when compared to TD-N phenotype ( p < 0.05). Compared to the TD-N, PIGD-N group exhibited significantly higher MD and RD in the tracts connecting the left superior temporal gyrus and left insula, and those connecting the right pars opercularis and right insula. Moreover, compared to TD-N, PIGD-N group had significantly higher RD in the tracts connecting right pars opercularis and right pars triangularis, and the tracts connecting right inferior temporal gyrus and right middle temporal gyrus. For the entire PD-N cohort, FAS verbal fluency scores positively correlated with MD in the superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF). This study confirmed that PIGD-N phenotype has more deficits in verbal fluency task than TD-N phenotype. Additionally, our findings suggest: (1) PIGD-N shows more microstructural changes related to FAS verbal fluency task when compared to TD-N phenotype; (2) SLF plays an important role in FAS verbal fluency task in PD-N patients regardless of motor phenotypes.