BACKGROUND:Several scores have been developed to facilitate risk stratification and early discharge following primary angioplasty, particularly the Zwolle Risk Score (ZRS). However, validation in large-sized studies is still lacking. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to validate the use of the ZRS in a contemporary global population, including patients who were treated during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and enrolled in a large intercontinental observational study. METHODS:The ISACS-STEMI COVID-19 is a large-scale retrospective multicenter registry involving primary PCI centers from Europe, Latin America, South-East Asia, and NorthAfrica, including patients treated from March 1st until June 30th, in 2019 and 2020]. ZRS was calculated for each patient. The patients were additionally categorized according to the following values of the ZRS [≤3; 4-6; 7-9; ≥10]. Our study outcomes were in-hospital and 30-day mortality. The discriminatory capacity of the ZRS was assessed by the area under the ROC curve [c statistic] as an index of model performance. RESULTS:Our population is represented by 16084 STEMI patients undergoing mechanical reperfusion enrolled in 109 centers. The score showed a very good performance in the predicting mortality both in-hospital [AUC=0.83 [0.82-0.85], p<0.0001] and at 30- day follow-up [AUC=0.82 [0.81-0.84, p<0.0001]. The results were confirmed when the ZRS was separately applied to patients treated in 2019 and 2020, with good stability across time. ZRS was able to identify a large cohort [n=10672, 66.3%] of low-risk patients [score ≤3] with a very low mortality rate at 2 days [1%] and between 3 and 10 days [0.7%], with a very good negative predictive value for in-hospital [98.3%] and 30-day mortality [97.7%], with similar results in 2019 and 2020. CONCLUSION:This study is the first to demonstrate the good prognostic performance of the ZRS in a large-scale contemporary global multicenter validation set. Similar results were obtained both in the pre-pandemic and the COVID-19 era. ZRS ≤3 identified a very low-risk population that could be discharged early, even during the COVID-19 pandemic, with expected advantages in the availability of hospital beds and nursing staff, costs of medical care, and in-hospital risk of contagion.

INTRODUCTION:Despite the large use of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASI) in STSegment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) patients, few data have been reported on the prognostic impact of chronic RASI at admission in patients suffering from STEMI, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, the current study investigated the prognostic impact of chronic RASI at admission in patients suffering from STEMI, including both SARS-CoV-2 positive and negative individuals, enrolled before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS:We included STEMI patients who received primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) and were enrolled in the ISACS-STEMI COVID-19 registry. In the present sub-analysis, patients were allocated according to chronic RASI therapy at admission. The primary study endpoint was the occurrence of in-hospital mortality. Secondary endpoints were postprocedural TIMI 3 flow and mortality at 1 month. RESULTS:The overall population was 15,693 patients, including 6,213 patients pretreated with RASI. Several differences in baseline characteristics were observed between the two groups. No difference was observed in the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection. After correction for all baseline confounders, including procedural features, chronic pretreatment with RASI was independently associated with improved postprocedural TIMI 3 flow (OR [95% CI] = 1.14 [1.03-1.35], p = 0.042), lower in-hospital mortality (adjusted OR [95% CI] = 0.64 [0.54-0.75], p < 0.001), and lower 30-day mortality (adjusted OR [95% CI] = 0.62 [0.53-0.73], p < 0.001). CONCLUSION:This is the largest study investigating the prognostic impact and benefits of chronic RASI pre-treatment in STEMI patients undergoing PPCI, including those treated during the COVID19 pandemic. We found that chronic RASI treatment at hospital admission was associated with significant improvement in reperfusion and reduction in mortality, without any negative effect in SARS-CoV-2 positive patients. Results should be interpreted considering the retrospective, nonrandomized nature of the study.

Cardiogenic shock (CS) in the setting of severe aortic stenosis (AS) presents a critical and high-risk scenario with limited therapeutic options and poor prognosis. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), initially reserved for inoperable or high-risk surgical candidates, is increasingly being considered in patients with CS due to improvements in device technology, operator experience, and supportive care. This review synthesizes current evidence from large registries, observational studies, and meta-analyses that support the feasibility, safety, and potential survival benefit of urgent or emergent TAVI in selected CS patients. Procedural success is high, and early intervention appears to confer improved short-term and mid-term outcomes compared to balloon aortic valvuloplasty or medical therapy alone. Critical factors influencing prognosis include lactate levels, left ventricular ejection fraction, renal function, and timing of intervention. The absence of formal guidelines, logistical constraints, and ethical concerns complicate decision-making in this unstable population. A multidisciplinary Heart Team/Shock Team approach is essential to identify appropriate candidates, manage procedural risk, and guide post-intervention care. Further studies and the development of TAVI-specific risk models in CS are anticipated to refine patient selection and therapeutic strategies. TAVI may represent a transformative option for stabilizing hemodynamics and improving outcomes in this otherwise high-mortality group.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS:Myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is a heterogeneous group of clinical entities requiring further investigation to assess prognosis and guide treatment. We evaluated current diagnostic practices across European academic centres in its diagnosis and management, to focus on current gaps in clinical practice. METHODS:Between June and October 2023, we distributed an electronic survey to 42 centres selected from a 2023 list of European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions Hosting Academic Centres, obtaining information on demographics of MINOCA, perceived clinical impact, testing and treatments. RESULTS:The analysis was based on data from 41 centres. According to the survey, MINOCA accounts for approximately 10% of MI cases. Only 38% of the respondents perceived MINOCA as increasing the risk for future major adverse cardiovascular events. Sixty-three percent of centres agreed on the need for further testing after MINOCA diagnosis, and 22% reported proceeding with a comprehensive diagnostic algorithm. Intravascular (51%) and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (50%) were the most common diagnostic tools used. Coronary plaque disruption was perceived as the most frequent cause based on respondents' opinions. Sixty-nine percent of centres considered 'empiric' therapy acceptable without functional testing. CONCLUSIONS:This survey revealed a significant heterogeneity in the diagnostic approaches to MINOCA in academic European centres, with variable belief of its clinical impact, wide variation in diagnostic algorithms, noteworthy diagnostic inertia, and poor adherence to guideline recommendations. All these point to a pressing need for a unified approach to MINOCA testing and a much closer alignment to guidelines.

Current evidence indicates that dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin plus a P2Y12 inhibitor is essential for the prevention of thrombotic events after percutaneous coronary interventions. However, dual antiplatelet therapy is associated with increased bleeding which may outweigh the benefits. This has set the foundations for customizing antiplatelet treatments to the individual patient. However, bleeding and ischemic risks are often present in the same patient, making it difficult to achieve this balance. The fact that oral P2Y12 inhibitors (clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor) have diverse pharmacodynamic profiles that affect clinical outcomes supports the rationale for using platelet function and genetic testing to individualize antiplatelet treatment regimens. Indeed, up to one-third of patients treated with clopidogrel, but a minority of those treated with prasugrel or ticagrelor, exhibit high residual platelet reactivity resulting in an increased thrombotic risk. On the other hand, prasugrel and ticagrelor are frequently associated with low platelet reactivity and increased bleeding risk compared with clopidogrel without providing any additional reduction in ischemic events compared with patients who adequately respond to clopidogrel. The use of platelet function and genetic testing may allow for a guided selection of oral P2Y12 inhibitors. However, the nonuniform results of randomized controlled trials have led guidelines to provide limited recommendations on the implementation of these tests in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. In light of recent advancements in the field, this consensus document by a panel of international experts fills in the guideline gap by providing updates on the latest evidence in the field as well as recommendations for clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: The effect of administering a crushed prasugrel loading dose is uncertain in patients presenting with a large myocardial infarction and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). AIMS: The aim of this study was to investigate if patients with a large myocardial infarction may benefit from prehospital administration of a crushed prasugrel loading dose. METHODS: Patients from the CompareCrush trial with an available ambulance electrocardiography (ECG) were included in the study. An independent core laboratory confirmed a prehospital large myocardial area. We compared preand postprocedural angiographic markers, including Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 3 flow in the infarct-related artery, high thrombus burden, and myocardial blush grade 3, in STEMI patients with and without a prehospital large myocardial area. RESULTS: Ambulance ECG was available for 532 patients, of whom 331 patients were identified with a prehospital large myocardial area at risk. Crushed prasugrel significantly improved postprocedural TIMI 3 flow rates in STEMI patients with a prehospital large myocardial area at risk (92% vs 79%, odds ratio [OR] 3.00, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.50-6.00) but not in STEMI patients without a prehospital large myocardial area at risk (91% vs 95%, OR 0.47, 95% CI: 0.14-1.57; p interaction =0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Administration of crushed prasugrel may improve postprocedural TIMI 3 flow in STEMI patients with signs of a large myocardial area at risk on the ambulance ECG. The practice of crushing tablets of prasugrel loading dose might, therefore, represent a safe, fast and cost-effective strategy to improve myocardial reperfusion in this high-risk STEMI subgroup undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Aim of our systematic review and meta-analysis is to compare shortened (<= 3 months) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with longer DAPT in diabetic patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions.We systematically screened 3 major databases (MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Scopus) searching for randomized-controlled trials or subanalyses of them, which compared shortened DAPT (S-DAPT) with longer DAPT regimens of DAPT. Primary end point of systematic review and meta-analysis is the net adverse clinical events (NACE), and secondary are major adverse cardiac events (MACE), mortality, bleedings, myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis. Subgroup analyses included studies using only ticagrelor-based regimens and 3-month duration of DAPT.A total of 8 studies and 12,665 patients were included in our analysis. Our meta-analysis met its primary end point because S-DAPT was associated significantly with a reduced risk ratio (RR) by 17% [RR: 0.83, 95% confidence intervals (CI), 0.72-0.96]. Nonsignificant difference among the rest end points was detected between the 2 groups. Subgroup analyses showed that ticagrelor-based regimens were associated with a significant reduction of mortality (RR: 0.67, 95% CI, 0.48-0.93) and 3-month DAPT reduced furtherly NACE by 27% (RR: 0.73, 95% CI, 0.60-0.89).In conclusion, our systematic review and meta-analysis showed that (i) S-DAPT was significantly associated with a lower incidence of NACE, (ii) ticagrelor-based S-DAPT was associated with decreased mortality rates, and (iii) the benefit of 3-month duration of DAPT achieved an even greater NACE reduction. Thus, S-DAPT could be considered as a safe and feasible option in diabetic patients.

Background: Direct stenting (DS) compared with conventional stenting (CS) after balloon predilatation may reduce distal embolization during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), thereby improving tissue reperfusion. In contrast, DS may increase the risk of stent underexpansion and target lesion failure. Methods: In this sub-study of the randomized COMPARE CRUSH trial (NCT03296540), we reviewed the efficacy of DS versus CS in a cohort of contemporary, pretreated ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing primary PCI. We compared DS versus CS, assessing (1) stent diameter in the culprit lesion, (2) thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow in the infarct-related artery post-PCI and complete ST-segment resolution (STR) one-hour post-PCI, and (3) target lesion failure at one year. For proportional variables, propensity score weighting was applied to account for potential treatment selection bias. Results: This prespecified sub-study included 446 patients, of whom 189 (42%) were treated with DS. Stent diameters were comparable between groups (3.2 ± 0.5 vs. 3.2 ± 0.5 mm, p = 0.17). Post-PCI TIMI 3 flow and complete STR post-PCI rates were similar between groups (DS 93% vs. CS 90%, adjusted OR 1.16 [95% CI, 0.56–2.39], p = 0.69, and DS 72% vs. CS 58%, adjusted OR 1.29 [95% CI 0.77–2.16], p = 0.34, respectively). Moreover, target lesion failure rates at one year were comparable (DS 2% vs. 1%, adjusted OR 2.93 [95% CI 0.52–16.49], p = 0.22). Conclusion: In this contemporary pretreated STEMI cohort, we found no difference in early myocardial reperfusion outcomes between DS and CS. Moreover, DS seemed comparable to CS in terms of stent diameter and one-year vessel patency.

Abbreviation of the duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) (one or three months) has been recently proposed, especially for high bleeding risk patients, after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stent (DES). Three databases were screened for eligible randomized control trials. The primary endpoint was the incidence of net adverse clinical events (NACE). Secondary endpoints consisted of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, stent-thrombosis, repeat revascularization and major bleeding. We included four RCTs with a total of 26,576 patients; 13,282 patients were grouped in 30-days DAPT, while the remaining 13,294 were allocated in a longer period of DAPT. One month of DAPT did not significantly reduce NACE (odds ratio [OR]: 0.87, 95% confidence intervals [Cl]: 0.74–1.03); however, major bleedings were significantly reduced by 22% (OR: 0.78, 95% Cl: 0.65–0.94). Mortality or ischemic events (stroke, myocardial infarction, revascularization and stent thrombosis) were not affected. Thus, 30-days DAPT could be considered as safe and feasible after PCI with DES in selected patients, especially those with high bleeding risk. Forthcoming RCTs could shed light on the optimal duration of DAPT.

SARS-Cov-2 has been suggested to promote thrombotic complications and higher mortality. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of SARS-CoV-2 positivity on in-hospital outcome and 30-day mortality in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) enrolled in the International Survey on Acute Coronary Syndromes ST-segment elevation Myocardial Infarction (ISACS-STEMI COVID-19 registry. The 109 SARS-CoV-2 positive patients were compared with 2005 SARS-CoV-2 negative patients. Positive patients were older (P = .002), less often active smokers (P = .002), and hypercholesterolemic (P = .006), they presented more often later than 12 h (P = .037), more often to the hub and were more often in cardiogenic shock (P = .02), or requiring rescue percutaneous coronary intervention after failed thrombolysis (P < .0001). Lower postprocedural Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 3 flow (P = .029) and more thrombectomy (P = .046) were observed. SARS-CoV-2 was associated with a significantly higher in-hospital mortality (25.7 vs 7%, adjusted Odds Ratio (OR) [95% Confidence Interval] = 3.2 [1.71-5.99], P < .001) in-hospital definite in-stent thrombosis (6.4 vs 1.1%, adjusted Odds Ratio [95% CI] = 6.26 [2.41-16.25], P < .001) and 30-day mortality (34.4 vs 8.5%, adjusted Hazard Ratio [95% CI] = 2.16 [1.45-3.23], P < .001), confirming that SARS-CoV-2 positivity is associated with impaired reperfusion, with negative prognostic consequences.

Aims To use quality indicators to study the management of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in different regions. Methods and results Prospective cohort study of STEM I within 24 h of symptom onset (11 462 patients, 196 centres, 26 European Society of Cardiology members, and 3 affiliated countries). The median delay between arrival at a percutaneous cardiovascular intervention (PCI) centre and primary PCI was 40 min (interquartile range 20-74) with 65.8% receiving PCI within guideline recommendation of 60 min. A third of patients (33.2%) required transfer from their initial hospital to one that could perform emergency PCI for whom only 27.2% were treated within the quality indicator recommendation of 120 min. Radial access was used in 56.6% of all primary PCI, but with large geographic variation, from 76.4 to 9.1%. Statins were prescribed at discharge to 98.7% of patients, with little geographic variation. Of patients with a history of heart failure or a documented left ventricular ejection fraction <= 40%, 84.0% were discharged on an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker and 88.7% were discharged on beta-blockers. Conclusion Care for STEMI shows wide geographic variation in the receipt of timely primary PCI, and is in contrast with the more uniform delivery of guideline-recommended pharmacotherapies at time of hospital discharge. [GRAPHICS] .

Abstract: GReek-AntiPlatElet Atrial Fibrillation registry is a multicenter, observational, noninterventional study of atrial fibrillation patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Primary endpoint included clinically significant bleeding rate at 12 months between different antithrombotic regimens prescribed at discharge; secondary endpoints included major adverse cardiovascular events and net adverse clinical events. A total of 647 patients were analyzed. Most (92.9%) were discharged on novel oral anticoagulants with only 7.1% receiving the vitamin K antagonist. A little over half of patients (50.4%) received triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT)—mostly (62.9%) for ≤1 month—whereas the rest (49.6%) received dual antithrombotic therapy (DAT). Clinically significant bleeding risk was similar between TAT and DAT [Hazard ratio (HR) = 1.08; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.66–1.78], although among TAT-receiving patients, the risk was lower in those receiving TAT for ≤1 month (HR = 0.50; 95% CI, 0.25–0.99). Anticoagulant choice (novel oral anticoagulant vs. vitamin K antagonist) did not significantly affect bleeding rates (P = 0.258). Age, heart failure, leukemia/myelodysplasia, and acute coronary syndrome were associated with increased bleeding rates. Risk of major adverse cardiovascular events and net adverse clinical events was similar between ΤAT and DAT (HR = 1.73; 95% CI, 0.95–3.18, P = 0.075 and HR = 1.39; 95% CI, 0.93–2.08, P = 0.106, respectively). In conclusion, clinically significant bleeding and ischemic rates were similar between DAT and TAT, although TAT >1 month was associated with higher bleeding risk.

Background: Optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients undergoing complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains under investigation. Our aim is to compare shortened (& LE;3 months) DAPT with longer DAPT in patients undergoing complex PCIs.Methods: Three major databases (MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Scopus) were screened. The primary endpoint was major bleedings as they are defined by the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) 3-5. The secondary endpoints were major adverse cardiovascular events, all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, and stent thrombosis.Results: Five studies were included in our analysis, with a total of 9,115 patients. Our meta-analysis met its primary endpoint, as abbreviated DAPT significantly reduced major bleedings by 43% (95% confidence intervals: 0.35-0.93). Ischemic events and mortality were not affected by the shortening of DAPT.Conclusion: Shortened DAPT significantly reduced the odds of major bleedings in patients undergoing complex PCI without increasing the ischemic events or mortality. Thus, it could be considered a safe and feasible option in such patients.(C) 2023 Hellenic Society of Cardiology. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Aims: We aimed to explored the association between the use of optimal medical therapy (OMT) in patients with myocardial infarction (AMI) and diabetes mellitus (DM) and clinical outcomes. Methods: Bleeding complications in a Multicenter registry of patients discharged with diagnosis of Acute Coro-nary Syndrome (BleeMACS) is an international registry that enrolled participants with acute coronary syndrome followed up for at least 1 year across 15 centers from 2003 to 2014. Baseline characteristics and endpoints were analyzed. Results: Among 3095 (23.2%) patients with AMI and DM, 1898 (61.3%) received OMT at hospital discharge. OMT was associated with significantly reduced mortality (4.3% vs. 10.8%, p < 0.001), re-AMI (4.4% vs. 8.1%, p < 0.001), and composite endpoint of death/re-AMI (8.0% vs. 17.6%, p < 0.001). No difference was observed among regions. Propensity score matching confirmed that OMT significantly associated with lower mortality. After adjusting for confounding variables, OMT, drug-eluting stents, and complete revascularization were in-dependent protective factors of 1-year mortality, whereas left ventricular ejection fraction and age were risk factors. Conclusions: Guideline-recommended OMT was prescribed at suboptimal frequencies with geographic variations in this worldwide cohort. OMT can improve long-term clinical outcomes in patients with DM and AMI. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT02466854 June 9, 2015.

Abstract Background/Introduction Direct stenting has been proposed to reduce vessel wall damage and distal embolization in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, studies comparing direct stenting with stenting after predilatation have shown mixed results so far. Patients presenting with high thrombus burden in the culprit lesion represent a subgroup of STEMI patients that may particularly benefit from direct stenting, as high thrombus burden is associated with suboptimal reperfusion and poor clinical outcomes. Purpose We sought to determine the efficacy of direct stenting compared with stenting after predilatation in STEMI patients presenting with high thrombus burden. Methods The randomized COMPARE CRUSH trial assessed the efficacy of pre-hospital administration of crushed versus integral prasugrel tablets in patients presenting with STEMI planned for primary PCI. We assessed Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow, corrected TIMI frame count (cTFC) and myocardial blush grade at the end of primary PCI, as well as the occurrence of complete (≥70%) ST-segment resolution 1 hour post-PCI in STEMI patients presenting with high thrombus burden in the culprit lesion (defined as a TIMI thrombus grade ≥3). Results A total of 417 STEMI patients were included in the current analysis of which 336 (81%) presented with high thrombus burden on initial angiography with 144 patients (43%) being treated with direct stenting. Patients undergoing direct stenting exhibited significantly lower cTFC post-PCI compared with stenting after predilatation (16 [12–24] vs. 20 [13–29], p=0.02). Moreover, direct stenting patients more frequently exhibited complete ST-segment resolution 1 hour post-PCI compared with stenting after predilatation (72% vs. 59%, OR 1.82 [95% CI, 1.11–2.99], p=0.02). In contrast, we found no differences in the occurrence of TIMI 3 flow (DS 92% vs. 92%, OR 1.02 [0.47–2.22], p=0.97) or myocardial blush grade 3 (DS 63% vs. 54%, OR 1.45 [95% CI, 0.83–2.52], p=0.19) post-PCI between groups. Conclusion STEMI patients presenting with high thrombus burden treated with direct stenting showed improved markers of early myocardial reperfusion compared with patients treated with stenting after predilatation, indicating that a direct stenting strategy may benefit the subgroup of STEMI patients that present with high thrombus burden. Randomized trials are warranted to further investigate whether the potential benefits of direct stenting outweigh potential hazards over the long-term. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Other. Main funding source(s): Daiichi-Sankyo and Shanghai MicroPort Medical

Platelet function testing (PFT) could be a useful clinical tool to guide individualized antithrombotic treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We aimed to investigate platelet reactivity (PR) in the context of a contemporary registry. “Real-world” data were retrieved from a nationwide, multicenter, observational study of AF patients on oral anticoagulants (OAC) undergoing PCI. Patients treated with a P2Y12 inhibitor, namely clopidogrel or ticagrelor, as part of double or triple antithrombotic therapy, were submitted to PFT before discharge and were followed up for 12 months. Out of 101 patients included in the study, 66 were submitted to PFT while on clopidogrel and 35 while on ticagrelor; PR was 162.9 ± 68 PRU and 46.02 ± 46 PRU, respectively (P < 0.001). High on-treatment PR (HTPR) was observed in 15 patients under clopidogrel (22.7%); 7 of them escalated to ticagrelor. Low on-treatment PR (LTPR) was found in 9 clopidogrel and 28 ticagrelor-treated patients (13.6% vs. 80%, P < 0.001), of whom only 1 de-escalated to clopidogrel. PR did not differ by OAC regimen. PFT results had no impact on aspirin prescription at discharge, while failed to predict significant bleeding events at follow up. Ticagrelor administration led to lower PR and lower incidence of HTPR in comparison with clopidogrel. Physicians’ behavior in response to knowledge of a patient’s PR was variable. Further studies are required to elucidate the role of PFT as a tool to guide individualized antithrombotic treatment in this clinical scenario.

This article is available in open access under Creative Common Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license, allowing to download articles and share them with others as long as they credit the authors and the publisher, but without permission to change them in any way or use them commercially. Low-dose ticagrelor with or without acetylsalicylic acid in patients with acute coronary syndrome: Rationale and design of the ELECTRA-SIRIO 2 trial

MI with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) comprises an important minority of cases of acute MI. Many different causes have been implicated in the pathogenetic mechanism of MINOCA. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is an indispensable tool for recognising the underlying pathogenetic mechanism when epicardial pathology is suspected. OCT can reliably identify coronary lesions not apparent on conventional coronary angiography and discriminate the various phenotypes. Plaque rupture and plaque erosion are the most frequently found atherosclerotic causes of MINOCA. Furthermore, OCT can contribute to the identification of ischaemic non-atherosclerotic causes of MINOCA, such as spontaneous coronary artery dissection, coronary spasm and lone thrombus. Recognition of the exact cause will enable therapeutic management to be tailored accordingly. The combination of OCT with cardiac magnetic resonance can set a definite diagnosis in the vast majority of MINOCA patients.

The optimal management for severely calcified coronary artery disease is multi-adjunctive. Different strategies with dedicated devices should be available in the cardiac catheterization laboratory with their selection depending on the nature of the calcific disease and its anatomical distribution. Shockwave Intravascular Lithotripsy (S-IVL) system offers a novel option for lesion preparation of heavily calcified plaques in coronary and peripheral vessels. S-IVL is based on the fundamental principles of lithotripsy, a technology that has been used to modify renal stones for over 30 years. Pulsatile mechanical energy is used to fragment selectively amorphous calcium, sparing soft tissue. S-IVL has the potential of more widespread adoption because of its proven safety, efficacy and operational simplicity, but cost-effectiveness of such advanced technology will need to be analyzed.