Objectives: Given the vulnerable health condition of adult childhood cancer survivors, it is essential that they develop positive health behaviors to minimize controllable health risks. Therefore, we evaluated if adult survivors of non-childhood cancer and childhood cancer differ in the odds of each modifiable risk factor compared with each other and compared with the general population. Methods: This nationally representative study leveraged the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) sample from 2000 to 2018 and the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) sample from 2016 to 2021. Our study population included adults diagnosed with cancer when they were ≤14 years of age. Outcomes included physical activity, body mass index (BMI), current smoking, ever-smoking, alcohol use, and binge drinking. Results: Insufficient physical activity was not statistically significant in the BRFSS, but in the NHIS, childhood cancer survivors had significantly more insufficient physical activity compared with non-childhood cancer survivors (aOR 1.29, P=0.038) and the general population (aOR 1.40, P=0.006). Childhood cancer survivors also had a higher likelihood of being significantly underweight (aOR 1.84, P=0.018) and having ever-smoked (aOR 1.42, P=0.001) compared with the general population in the NHIS. There was a significantly higher likelihood of smoking among childhood cancer survivors in the BRFSS (aOR 2.02, P=0.004). Conclusions: The likelihoods of many risky behaviors between adult childhood cancer survivors and general population controls were comparable, although rates of physical activity may be decreased, and rates of smoking may be increased among childhood cancer survivors. Targeted interventions are needed to promote healthy behaviors in this vulnerable population.

Background:Understanding the role of health insurance in cancer survival in a diverse population of pediatric radiation oncology patients could help to identify patients at risk of adverse outcomes. Materials and Methods:Data were collected from cancer patients evaluated for radiation therapy, age <19, diagnosed from January 1990 to August 2019. Predictors of recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed by univariable and multivariable Cox regression. Variables included health insurance, diagnosis type, sex, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status deprivation index. Results:The study included 459 patients with a median diagnosis age of 9 years. Demographic breakdown was 49.5% Hispanic, 27.2% non-Hispanic White, and 20.7% non-Hispanic Black. There were 203 recurrences and 86 deaths observed over a median follow-up of 2.4 years. Five-year RFS was 59.8% (95% CI, 51.6, 67.0) versus 36.5% (95% CI, 26.6, 46.6), and 5-year OS was 87.5% (95% CI, 80.9, 91.9) versus 71.0% (95% CI, 60.3, 79.3) in private pay insurance versus Medicaid/Medicare, respectively. Multivariable showed Medicaid/Medicare patients experienced a 54% higher risk of recurrence (hazard ratio: 1.54, 95% CI, 1.08, 2.20) and 79% higher risk of death (hazard ratio: 1.79, 95% CI, 1.02, 3.14) than privately insured patients. Conclusions:Significant disadvantages in RFS and OS were identified in radiation oncology patients with Medicaid/Medicare insurance, even after adjusting for clinical and demographic variables.

Purpose As pediatric cancer survival rates have exponentially increased in the past decade, with the vast majority surviving five years or more, the long-term impacts of treatment on the quality of survivorship must be explored. This study examines the effects of pediatric cancer treatment regimens on education outcomes among a demographically diverse regional population. The primary objective is to identify potential factors that may impact the educational and cognitive quality of life in this population. Methods Four hundred sixty-eight pediatric oncology patients diagnosed at age <20 between January 1990 -August 2019 and treated for cancer with radiation therapy at a large public or a multi-center private hospital in South Florida were identified. A novel survey available in English and Spanish was electronically distributed at least three times to each patient from August 2020 -July 2021 via email, phone call, and text message. Variables relating to demographics, treatment, cognitive impairment, and school re-entry were collected through the survey and electronic medical record review. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed. Results Of the patients, 10.5% responded to the survey (26 male, 21 female, two unidentified sex). The mean age was 8.9 years old (range 0-20) at diagnosis, 24.0 years old (range 8-39) at the time of survey completion, and 55.1% self-identified as Hispanic. Nearly one-quarter of respondents (22.4%) were unable to correctly identify the treatment modalities they received; Hispanic self-identifying patients were 1.75 times more likely than non-Hispanic patients to incorrectly report the treatment modalities received. One-quarter (26.5%) of respondents reported long-term cognitive deficits post-treatment, of which, over three-quarters (76.9%) identified as Hispanic. Conclusion This study illuminates patients' perspectives on their long-term cognitive impacts after pediatric cancer treatment. Given the diverse study population, ethnic disparities in post-treatment survivorship were explored. A substantial subset of Hispanic participants was unable to correctly identify their treatment regimen, and a disproportionately large group of Hispanic patients experienced cognitive long-term cognitive deficits, suggesting that ethnic disparities play a critical role in post-treatment survivorship. Further research on prioritizing educational intervention during and after treatment is essential to improving both the quality and equity of survivorship among pediatric oncology patients.

Background For selected patients with early-stage breast cancer (BC), intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) has emerged as a convenient alternative to standard whole breast irradiation (WBI). We report a single institution experience with IORT in terms of oncologic outcomes, toxicities, and cosmesis. Methods Clinicopathological and perioperative outcomes of patients who underwent IORT for early-stage BC at a public hospital from 2017 to 2020 were retrospectively retrieved. Toxicity was categorized to acute or chronic based on 6 months post-IORT cutoff. Results 85 patients underwent IORT and had complete data, aged 49‐85 years (mean 62). Intraoperative radiation therapy added 23 minutes on average to the total operative time. Final stage was 0, I, and II in 40%, 58.9%, and 1.1% of patients, respectively. Mean tumor size was 0.8 cm (range .1-2.1), with ductal histology comprising 94% of cases. Surgical margins were positive in 2 patients, and adjuvant WBI was required in 5 patients. After a median follow‐up of 17 months (range 3-41), none of the patients had local recurrence and no mortality was recorded. Early wound complications included wound dehiscence (n = 1), seroma/hematoma (n = 15), and re-operation with loss of nipple-areola complex (n = 1). Chronic skin toxicities were reported in 10 (12%) patients and good or excellent cosmetic outcome was reported in 93% of patients. Conclusions Utilizing IORT among low-risk early BC patients may be a safe and more convenient alternative to traditional WBI, with low toxicity rate, acceptable cosmetic results, and good oncologic outcomes at 17 months. Longer follow-up and further prospective controlled studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Comprehensive information on clinical features and long-term outcomes of primary conjunctival extranodal marginal zone lymphoma (PCEMZL) is scarce. We present a large single-institution retrospective study of 72 patients. The median age was 64 years, and 63.9% were female. Stage I was present in 87.5%. Radiation therapy (RT) alone was the most common treatment (70.8%). Complete response (CR) was 87.5%, and 100% in RT-treated patients. With a median follow-up of 6.7 years, relapse/progression and death occurred in 19.4% each, with one relapse within the RT field. The 10-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 68.4% (95% CI 52.8%-79.8%) and 89.4% (95% CI 77.4%-95.2%), respectively. The 10-year rate for time to progression from diagnosis was 22.5% (95% CI 11.6%-35.7%). The 10-year PFS and OS of MALT-IPI 0 versus 1-2 were 83.3% versus 51.3%, (p = .022) and 97.6% versus 76.6%, (p = .0052), respectively. The following characteristics were associated with shorter survival: age > 60 years (PFS: HR = 2.93, 95% CI 1.08-7.95; p = .035, OS: HR = 9.07, 95% CI 1.17-70.26; p = .035) and MALT-IPI 1-2 (PFS: HR = 2.67, 95% CI 1.12-6.31; p = .027, OS: HR = 6.64, 95% CI 1.45-30.37; p = .015). CR following frontline therapy was associated with longer PFS (HR = 0.13, 95% CI 0.04-0.45; p = .001), but not OS. Using the Fine and Gray regression model with death without relapse/progression as a competing risk, RT and CR after frontline therapy were associated with lower risk of relapse (SHR = 0.34, 95% CI 0.12-0.96 p = .041 and SHR = 0.11, 95% CI 0.03-0.36; p < .001, respectively). Patients with PCEMZL treated with frontline RT exhibit excellent long-term survival, and the MALT-IPI score appropriately identifies patients at risk for treatment failure.

OBJECTIVES:To examine the efficacy and safety of radiotherapy for the prevention of heterotopic ossification (HO) about the elbow.DESIGN:Retrospective chart review.SETTING:Level 1 trauma center.PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS:Two hundred and twenty-nine patients who received prophylactic radiotherapy (XRT) over a 15-year period were identified. Patients were included if they received XRT to the elbow joint and had at least 12 weeks of follow-up after XRT. Fifty-four patients were ultimately included.INTERVENTION:All patients were treated with a single dose of 7 Gy. Ninety-eight percentage of patients received XRT within 24 hours after surgery, and all patients received XRT within 72 hours after surgery.MAIN OUTCOMES MEASUREMENTS:The primary study measures evaluated were the presence or absence of clinically symptomatic HO and the presence of radiographic HO after XRT to the elbow joint.RESULTS:Eighteen patients were treated with XRT after a traumatic injury requiring surgery (primary prophylaxis), and 36 were treated with XRT after excision surgery to remove HO which had already formed (secondary prophylaxis). In the primary cohort, 16.7% developed symptomatic HO after XRT and 11.1% required surgery to resect the heterotopic bone. In the secondary cohort, 11.1% developed symptomatic HO after surgery and XRT and 5.5% required resection surgery. No secondary malignancies were identified.CONCLUSIONS:Our findings suggest that XRT for elbow HO may be safe and effective for both primary and secondary HO. XRT for HO was not shown to be associated with radiation-induced sarcoma in this series, at least in the short term. Further study in a large patient population with extended follow-up is required to better characterize populations at high risk for development of HO and secondary malignancy.LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Prophylactic radiotherapy (XRT) is a commonly used treatment to decrease heterotopic ossification (HO) in patients with traumatic hip injuries. We conducted a retrospective review of patients at risk for HO who underwent XRT. Of the patients reviewed, 27.3% developed radiographic HO, 11.2% developed symptoms, and 2.0% required resection surgery. Patients were divided into primary (n = 71) and secondary prophylaxis (n = 27) cohorts. In the primary group, 25.0% developed radiographic HO, 5.6% developed symptoms, and 0 required surgery. In the secondary cohort, 33.3% of patients developed new radiographic HO, and 25.9% were symptomatic: four had a Brooker score of 3, and three had a score of 4 (p = 0.03), and 7.4% required surgical resection. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 31(2):113-118, 2022).

The analysis reveals significantly worse survival outcomes in pediatric cancer patients with Medicaid/Medicare. The disparity in survival between private vs. Medicaid/Medicare patients exists despite no differences in treatment initiation times or differences in survival between treatment sites. These findings suggest that factors outside of treatment in the hospital systems are contributing to the inferior outcomes in Medicaid/Medicare-insured pediatric cancer patients. These factors may include later stage of cancer at time of diagnosis due to inferior healthcare accessibility. Further research is necessary to discern what factors are driving the disparities observed in the Medicaid/Medicare pediatric cancer population in order to improve their outcomes.

Ni(COD)2 reacts with But3SnH and CNBut at room temperature to afford the trigonal bipyramidal complex Ni(SnBut3)2(CNBut)3, 3. Exposing a solution of 3 to CO gas results in ligand exchange generating the pale yellow complex, Ni(SnBut3)2(CNBut)2(CO), 4. In the presence of light, a Ni-Sn bond in 4 is cleaved converting two equivalents of compound 4 into the deep purple nickel-tin dimer, [Ni(SnBut3)(CNBut)2(CO)]2, 5. The reaction is believed to proceed through radical mechanisms.

After applying PERCIST to our institutional study cohort, the use of post-treatment PET-CT imaging to predict outcomes for this patient population remains unproven.

Abstract Background The most common subtype of B-cell lymphomas presenting in the conjunctiva is extranodal marginal zone lymphoma (EMZL), accounting for ~80% of cases. Most patients (pts) present with localized disease, and radiation therapy (RT) is the preferred treatment strategy. We aimed to retrospectively analyze our single-institution experience to provide further insight into the characteristics and long-term outcomes of conjunctival EMZL. Methods We evaluated 72 pts diagnosed with conjunctival EMZL between 01/1995 and 12/2020 at the University of Miami. Pts' characteristics included age, sex, TNM-AJCC ocular lymphoma and Ann Arbor staging systems, MALT-IPI score, treatment (RT, chemotherapy, rituximab), and treatment response (complete response (CR), partial response, stable disease, progression of disease). Primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and compared using the log rank test and the univariable Cox regression analysis. We also performed a competing risk univariable analysis (UVA) assessing predictors of cumulative incidence of relapse/progression, with death without relapse as a competing risk, using the Fine and Gray regression analysis. Results Among all 72 pts, mean age was 59.9 yrs (7-93) with 38 (52.8%) being >60 yrs old, 46 (63.9%) were female, 56 (77.8%) had unilateral conjunctival disease, localized disease (T1N0M0 and Ann Arbor stage I) was present in 63 (87.5%), 6 (8.3%) had disseminated disease with more than 1 extranodal site involved, and 29 (40.3%) had a MALT-IPI of 1 or 2. After biopsy and surgical removal, 65 (90.2%) received additional treatment, while 6 (8.3%) were followed only, and in one case therapy information was not available . RT was the most common treatment (53 pts [73.6%], with 46 [86.8%] of those treated with ≥ 30 Gy). In two of these patients RT was combined with chemotherapy. Other treated pts received immunochemotherapy (12 [16.7%], including rituximab in 8). Five pts with stage II-IV disease received systemic therapy. CR was achieved in 63 (87.5%) after first line treatment, and no high-grade lymphoma transformation was seen. With a median follow up of 6.67 yrs (0.56-24.13), there were 14 relapses (19.4%). Among 53 pts treated with RT there were 8 relapses (15.1%), only one (1.9%) within the RT field. There were 23 progression events (31.9%, 14 relapses and 9 deaths without documented relapse), and a total of 14 deaths (19.4%). Mean PFS and OS were 6.69 yrs (0.49-20.37, SD 4.95) and 7.81 yrs (0.56-24.13, SD 5.40), respectively. The 10-yr PFS and OS were 68.4% (95%CI 52.8, 79.8%) and 89.4% (95%CI 77.4, 95.2%), respectively. Variables associated with shorter PFS in UVA Cox model were age > 60 yrs (HR=2.93, 95%CI 1.08, 7.95; p=0.035), high MALT-IPI (1-2) (HR=2.42, 95%CI 1.01, 5.78; p=0.048), and use of chemotherapy only (HR=2.73, 95%CI 1.13, 6.56; p=0.025). Variables associated with shorter OS included age >60 yrs (HR=9.07, 95%CI 1.17, 70.26; p=0.035) and high MALT-IPI (HR=6.19, 95%CI 1.35, 28.33; p=0.019). CR after frontline therapy was associated with longer PFS (HR=0.13, 95%CI 0.04, 0.45; p=0.001) but not OS. PFS of MALT-IPI 0 vs 1-2 was significantly longer (p=0.042), with 10-yr PFS 80.9% (95%CI 63.4%, 90.6%) vs 55.6% (95%CI 32.1%, 73.8%). Similarly, longer OS was observed in MALT-IPI 0 pts (p=0.0077; 10-yr OS 95.2% [95%CI 82.2%, 98.8%] vs 80.6% [95%CI 55.6%, 92.4%]) (Figure). A subset UVA Cox analysis of patients with Ann Arbor stage I showed longer PFS associated with CR after frontline therapy (HR 0.15, 95%CI 0.04, 0.58; p=0.006) with no significant association with age >60 yrs, high MALT-IPI or use of chemotherapy. Variables associated with shorter OS were age >60 yrs (HR 8.01, 95%CI 1.00, 63.98; p=0.05) and high MALT-IPI (HR 13.41, 95%CI 1.67, 107.99; p=0.015), similarly to the primary analysis. On univariable Fine and Gray regression models with death without relapse/progression as a competing risk, RT (SHR=0.33, 95%CI 0.12, 0.96; p=0.041) and CR-post frontline therapy (SHR=0.11, 95%CI 0.03, 0.36; p<0.001) were associated with lower risk of relapse. Conversely, chemotherapy (SHR=3.47, 95%CI 1.20, 10.0; p=0.022) was associated with higher risk of relapse. Conclusion Patients with conjunctival EMZL exhibit excellent long-term survival, and RT remains the most effective frontline therapy. MALT-IPI appropriately identifies patients at risk for treatment failure. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Alderuccio: ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Oncinfo / OncLive: Honoraria; Puma Biotechnology: Other: Family member; Inovio Pharmaceuticals: Other: Family member; Agios Pharmaceuticals: Other: Family member; Forma Therapeutics: Other: Family member. Lossos: Lymphoma Research Foundation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; NCI: Research Funding; Stanford University: Patents & Royalties; Verastem: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; NIH grants: Research Funding; University of Miami: Current Employment.

2][3][4][5][6] RT results in complete response (CR) in .92% of stage I patients, with a 5-year overall survival (OS) and cause-specific survival of 94% and 99%, respectively. 1,7Disease relapses are observed in 8% to 19% of patients, with the majority (80%) occurring within the first 5 years of RT, usually outside of the radiation field. 1,3,4,8Relapses are more commonly observed in distant extranodal sites but may involve local lymph nodes, spleen, and bone marrow (BM). 9Thyroid and gastric presentations are associated with a significantly lower risk of distant relapses 1 in comparison with other EMZL presentations. 10

The current study evaluates dosimetric and spectral effects when platinum (Pt)-based chemotherapeutics and less toxic tungstophosphoric-acid (TPA) organometallics are present during x-ray radiotherapy. We hypothesize that the use of high energy photon beams (i.e. 18 MV) will increase absorbed dose due to increased pair production from high-Z elements and thus result in additional tumor cell kill. EGSnrc code was used to examine the contribution of pair production to dose in the presence of the high-Z material (TPA, Pt mixtures and tungsten, W) as a function of beam energy. Variables included different concentrations (100 µmolar, 1 mmolar), depths (5 mm, 10 cm), thicknesses (5 mm, 5 cm) and energies (6, 18 MV). Overall, for the deeper depth, the 511 keV photon fluence increase was up 31% (18 MV-1 mmolar) while at 6 MV it was between 10%-11% depending on the concentration. For the shallower depth, 18 MV fluence increase was up 14.6% (1 mmolar) and 18.6% (1 mmolar) for the 6 MV. The dose enhancement effect due to pair production was up 25%-30% and a total 33%-58% depending on the depth. The benefit related to pair production was more for 18 MV and under conditions that simulated a realistic clinical setup. While part of the effect could be attributed to photoabsorption, a significant contribution of dose could result from pair production. Experimental clonogenic survival assay was consistent with the theory in that the low dose shoulder region of a cell survival curve was reduced using TPA and 18 MV compared with TPA and 6 MV or compared with no TPA and 18 MV; RBE was approximately 2 at the dose commonly used in conventional fractionated clinical radiotherapy. This suggests a potential new strategy for dose enhancement based on pair production using higher energy beamlines.

There are limited studies evaluating the outcomes in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET). The purpose of this study is to evaluate outcomes and identify predictors of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients receiving NET. This is a retrospective, IRB approved study of ER+ HER2- breast cancer patients treated with NET from 2000-2018 at a university hospital and an associated safety net hospital. Patient demographics, disease characteristics, treatment regimens, and clinical outcomes were collected through patient record review. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Predictors of PFS and OS were evaluated using univariable and multivariable Cox’s regression modeling. A total of 201 patients were reviewed and 151 with disease diagnosed between 2000 and 2017 had surgery and complete data for analysis. Median age of diagnosis was 61 years and median FU was 45.1 months (range: 2.7 to 177.1). The population consisted of mostly postmenopausal (98%) women, of those 35 (23.2%) were black (including 4 Hispanics), 104 (68.9%) Hispanic white, 9 (6%) non-Hispanic white and 3 (2%) Asian. By clinical staging, 1.3% were stage I, 52.3% stage II, 44.4% stage III and 2% stage IV. Median tumor size was 5 cm. Following NET, 53 patients (35.1%) underwent lumpectomy and 98 (64.9%) underwent mastectomy. Ninety-six patients (63.6%) received adjuvant chemotherapy. Radiotherapy was delivered to 104 patients (68.9%). Sixty-one patients (40.4%) had ≥ 50% tumor size reduction at time of surgery. Pathological complete response was observed in 4 patients (2.6%). PFS and OS in the overall group was favorable, at 75.3% (95%CI: 65.8, 82.5%) and 89.6% (95%CI: 80.3, 94.7%) at 60 months, respectively. In univariable analysis race/ethnicity, clinical tumor stage III-IV, 4+ positive lymph nodes, 50% tumor size reduction were significant predictors for PFS (p<0.05) and only race/ethnicity was significant predictors for OS (p<0.05). On multivariable analysis only tumor size reduction was a predictor for PFS (p<0.05) and there was a trend for black race to have worse OS (p=0.078). This is the largest retrospective study of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy in an underserved population. NET is well tolerated, easy to deliver, and less costly in a safety net hospital system. Our study demonstrated overall excellent outcomes using NET in a multi-racial/ethnic ER+ HER2- breast cancer population. Our results indicate that there may be a difference in response to endocrine therapy based on race, and this deserves further characterization. A better understanding of the tumor response to NET may allow us to further individualize treatment regimens, such as adding radiation or systemic therapy, to improve PFS in the poor responders. Prospective trials are needed.

Purpose: Severe late toxicity is common after re-irradiation for recurrent or second primary (RSP) squamous carcinoma of the head and neck. However, many patients experience complications from tumor progression before manifesting late effects. We constructed a nomogram to examine this relationship between late toxicity and competing risks. Methods and materials: Patients with RSP squamous carcinoma originating in a field previously irradiated to >= 40 Gy and treated with IMRT-based re-irradiation to >= 40 Gy were collected. Grade >= 3 late toxicity developing >= 90 days after re-irradiation was collected. A multivariable competing-risk model was fit to the actuarial risk of late toxicity with progression or death as the competing risk. The final bootstrap optimized model was converted into a nomogram. Results: From 9 institutions, 505 patients were included. The 2-year incidence of grade >= 3 late toxicity was 16.7% (95% CI 13.2-20.2%) whereas progression or death was 64.2% (95% CI 59.7-68.8%). The median freedom from late toxicity, progression or death was 10.7, 5.5 and 3.2 months for RPA class I-III patients respectively, whereas the median OS was 44.9, 15.9 and 7.9 months, respectively. The final model included six clinical factors. Notably, dose, volume and fractionation did not significantly impact toxicity. Conclusions: After re-irradiation, the risk of progression or death is approximately four times the risk of radiation-related severe late toxicity. The risk of late toxicity may be more dependent on patient and disease factors than modifiable treatment factors. This model is useful for patient selection, pre-treatment consent and post-treatment survivorship following re-irradiation.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with stage I localized extranodal marginal zone lymphoma (EMZL) treated with radiation therapy (RT) have excellent outcomes. Negative bone marrow (BM) biopsy at diagnosis is key to confirm early stage disease. However, BM biopsy is not performed in some patients for various reasons such as comorbidities, patient refusal or physician decision. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of BM status (negative vs. not done) on disease recurrence/progression and survival in EMZL patients presenting with otherwise localized disease by imaging and treated with RT. METHODS: From January 1995 to January 2019, we identified 188 patients with stage I EMZL treated with frontline RT at the University of Miami Health Care System. All patients had biopsy proven EMZL and scans (CT, MRI, and/or PET-CT) at the time of diagnosis. Medical records were reviewed and pertinent information gathered. Relapse/progression was subclassified based on disease location: inside, outside, or inside and outside of the radiation field (RF). The competing risk method and the Gray's test were used in analysis of incidence rates of type of relapse/progression and lymphoma-specific death. The Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test were used in analyses of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Among 188 patients included in this study, 104 (55.3%) were ≤60 years and 135 (71.8%) <70 years. 117 (62.2%) females and 98 (52.1%) non-Hispanic Whites. EMZL location was as follows: Orbit 118 (62.8%), gastric 19 (10.1%), head & neck 14 (7.4%), dural 13 (6.9%), skin 12 (6.4%), and other 12 (6.4%). Most patients had a negative staging BM biopsy (148, 78.7%); however, in 40 (21.3%) patients BM biopsy was not performed. Patients without BM biopsy at diagnosis were mainly >60 years (26, 65%). Radiation doses broadly varied but most patients (176, 93.6%) received ≥30 Gy. 183 patients (97.3%) achieved complete response (CR) following RT with 2 (1.1%) achieving partial response (PR), 2 (1.1%) stable disease and 1 (0.5%) demonstrating disease progression. Among 176 patients receiving ≥30 Gy RT, 173 (98.2%) achieved CR. With a median follow-up of 6.2 years (range 0.3-22.3 years) the 10 years-PFS was 64.4% (95%CI:54.9%-72.5%). No difference in PFS was observed by location of disease or BM biopsy (negative vs. not done). Patients treated with ≥30Gy had statistically significantly longer PFS compared to patients treated with <30Gy, whether or not BM biopsy was done. There were 52 progression events, including 5 inside RF (4 relapses/1 progression), 6 inside & outside (5 relapses/1 progression), 25 outside alone (24 relapses/1 progression), and 16 non-lymphoma deaths. Taking into account non-lymphoma death as a competing risk, the 5-year incidence of lymphoma relapse/progression was 2.9% (95%CI:1.1-6.3%) inside RF, 3.4% (95%CI:1.2-7.3%) inside & outside RF and 9.8% (5.8-15.0%) outside RF. Importantly, there was no higher cumulative incidence of each type of relapse/progression relative to RF (inside p=0.2490, inside & outside p=0.1617, and outside alone p=0.3070) in patients without vs. negative staging BM biopsy. There were 23 deaths, 7 attributed to lymphoma. The 10-year OS was 83.3% (95%CI:75.0-89.0%), and there was no difference in OS by EMZL location. Patients without staging BM biopsy had shorter OS (p=0.0062). However, when lymphoma-specific death was analyzed (non-lymphoma death as competing risk) the estimated 10-year cumulative incidence of lymphoma-specific death was 5.3% (2.3%-10.2%) and there was a non-statistically significant difference between patients with and without staging BM biopsy (p=0.5201). The cumulative 10-years incidence of non-lymphoma specific death (lymphoma death as competing risk) was 11.4% (95% CI:6.3%-18.2%). There was a statistically significant difference by BM biopsy status (p=0.0107), with patients without staging BM biopsy having higher incidence of non-lymphoma death compared to negative BM biopsy patients (10-yr rate 26.7% vs 7.9%, respectively), likely due to coexistent comorbidities. CONCLUSION: In this large cohort of patients with stage I EMZL treated with RT we demonstrate for the first time that omission of BM biopsy at diagnosis does not affect lymphoma-specific survival or the incidence of disease relapse/progression overall or by relapse location type, suggesting that diagnostic BM biopsy may not be necessary. Disclosures Alderuccio: Foundation Medicine: Other: Immediate family member; Inovio Pharmaceuticals: Other: Immediate family member; Targeted Oncology: Honoraria; Agios: Other: Immediate family member; Puma Biotechnology: Other: Immediate family member; OncLive: Consultancy. Lossos:NIH: Research Funding; Janssen Scientific: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Objective: The objective of the study is to present our experience of treating adrenal metastases using stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients with adrenal metastases treated using SBRT from 2001 to 2014. Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1 was used. Maximum tumor response was defined as the greatest percentage tumor reduction noted on two or more post-SBRT CT scans. Results: We identified 44 patients (median age 61.3 years, range: 25.8–85), with 54 adrenal metastases; primary diagnoses include non-small cell lung cancer (28 patients and 38 lesions), small cell lung cancer (1 patient), hepatocellular carcinoma (6 patients), and other (9 patients). Treatment was delivered in single (16 lesions, median dose 18 Gy [14–18]) or multiple fractions (38 lesions, median dose 30 Gy [16–40]). Median planning target volume was 49.65cc (3.21–984.54). Median response at first post-SBRT follow-up (median 1.65 months (m) (0.33–5.37), n = 46 lesions) was 10.8% with 91.3% local control. Median maximum tumor response was 31.8% (n = 32 lesions) at median follow-up of 5.4 m (0.9–44.8) with 96.6% local control. The response was comparable regardless of tumor histology or treatment fractionation. No patients experienced Grade 3/4 acute toxicities. One patient with a history of naproxen use required suturing with omental patch placement for perforated pyloric ulcer 14 m post-SBRT (18 Gy in single fraction) to the right adrenal metastasis; this region received <5 Gy. Ten patients treated for pain with available follow-up obtained relief. Conclusions: SBRT is a safe and efficacious treatment for adrenal metastases, demonstrating local tumor control. Further study of the impact on survival and quality of life is warranted.

Purpose: Limited data exist to guide the treatment technique for reirradiation of recurrent or second primary squamous carcinoma of the head and neck. We performed a multi-institution retrospective cohort study to investigate the effect of the elective treatment volume, dose, and fractionation on outcomes and toxicity. Methods and Materials: Patients with recurrent or second primary squamous carcinoma originating in a previously irradiated field (>= 40 Gy) who had undergone reirradiation with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT); (>= 40 Gy re-IMRT) were included. The effect of elective nodal treatment, dose, and fractionation on overall survival (OS), locoregional control, and acute and late toxicity were assessed. The Kaplan-Meier and Gray's competing risks methods were used for actuarial endpoints. Results: From 8 institutions, 505 patients were included in the present updated analysis. The elective neck was not treated in 56.4% of patients. The median dose of re-IMRT was 60 Gy (range 39.6-79.2). Hyperfractionation was used in 20.2%. Systemic therapy was integrated for 77.4% of patients. Elective nodal radiation therapy did not appear to decrease the risk of locoregional failure (LRF) or improve the OS rate. Doses of >= 66 Gy were associated with improvements in both LRF and OS in the definitive re-IMRT setting. However, dose did not obviously affect LRF or OS in the postoperative re-IMRT setting. Hyperfractionation was not associated with improved LRF or OS. The rate of acute grade >= 3 toxicity was 22.1% overall. On multivariable logistic regression, elective neck irradiation was associated with increased acute toxicity in the postoperative setting. The rate of overall late grade >= 3 toxicity was 16.7%, with patients treated postoperatively with hyperfractionation experiencing the highest rates. Conclusions: Doses of >= 66 Gy might be associated with improved outcomes in high-performance patients undergoing definitive re-IMRT. Postoperatively, doses of 50 to 66 Gy appear adequate after removal of gross disease. Hyperfractionation and elective neck irradiation were not associated with an obvious benefit and might increase toxicity. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PURPOSE:The therapeutic ratio of reirradiation for recurrent or second primary (RSP) squamous carcinoma of the head and neck may be improved in the intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) era. However, patient selection for reirradiation remains challenging. We performed a multi-institution cohort study to investigate modern outcomes after IMRT-based reirradiation and to identify prognostic subgroups. PATIENTS AND METHODS:Patients with RSP squamous carcinoma originating in a previously irradiated field (≥40 Gy) who underwent reirradiation with IMRT (≥40 Gy re-IMRT) were included. Locoregional failure and late toxicity were calculated using the Gray competing risk method. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify factors associated with overall survival (OS). Factors associated with OS were entered into a recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) for OS. RESULTS:From 7 institutions, 412 patients were included. The median dose of re-IMRT was 60 Gy, and the median time between RT courses was 2.4 years. Chemotherapy was used in 76% of patients. The rates of grade ≥3, grade ≥4, and grade 5 acute toxicities were 19%, 4.4%, and 1.2%, respectively. The 2-year cumulative incidence of grade ≥3 late toxicity adjusted for the competing risks of recurrence or death was 14.2%. RPA identified 3 prognostic subgroups with distinct and homogenous OS (P<.001): class I included patients >2 years from their initial course of RT with resected tumors (2-year OS, 61.9%); class II included patients >2 years with unresected tumors or those ≤2 years and without feeding tube or tracheostomy dependence (2-year OS, 40.0%), and the remaining patients formed class III (2-year OS, 16.8%). Fifty-nine percent of class III patients underwent postoperative re-irradiation. CONCLUSIONS:This study informs outcomes and expectations with IMRT-based reirradiation. The RPA classification identifies 3 distinct subgroups, which can guide patient selection for therapy and clinical trial design. RPA class III patients are not ideal candidates for protracted chemoradiation regardless of resection status.