This study compares the objective American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) and Adult Comorbidity Evaluation-27 (ACE-27) scores with the subjective Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) for patient outcome prediction. We retrospectively analyzed head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients treated with adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy at the LMU Munich from June 2008 to June 2015. The study focused on associations between patient outcomes; treatment failures; known risk factors (including human papillomavirus [HPV] status and tumor stage); and the comorbidity indices ECOG-PS, ASA score, and ACE-27. The Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model were used for survival analysis and identifying independent risk factors. A total of 302 patients were analyzed, 175 received concurrent chemotherapy. Median follow-up was 61.8 months, and median age at diagnosis was 61 years. The 3‑ and 5‑year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 70.5

Background and purpose: Patients receiving cranial radiotherapy are immobilized with a thermoplastic mask to restrict patient motion. Depending on the target volume margins and treatment dose, different mask systems are used. Intrafractional movements can be monitored using stereoscopic X-ray imaging. The aim of the present work was to compare the magnitudes of intrafractional deviation for different mask systems. Material and methods: Four different head mask systems (open face mask, open mask, stereotactic mask, double mask) used in the treatment of 40 patients were investigated. In total 487 treatment fractions and 3708 X-ray images were collected. Deviations were calculated by comparison of the acquired X-ray images with digitally reconstructed radiographs. The results of intrafractional X-ray deviations for translational and rotational axes were compared between the different mask systems. Results: Deviations were below 0.6 mm for translations and below 0.6 for rotations for all mask systems. Along the lateral and longitudinal directions the stereotactic mask was superior, while along the vertical direction the double mask showed the lowest deviations. For low rotational deviations the double mask is the best amongst all other mask systems. Conclusion: As expected, the lowest movement was shown using cranial stereotactic mask systems. The results have shown deviations lower than 0.6 mm and 0.6 using any of the four thermoplastic mask systems.

AbstractIn modern radiotherapy (RT), especially for stereotactic radiotherapy or stereotactic radiosurgery treatments, image guidance is essential. Recently, the ExacTrac Dynamic (EXTD) system, a new combined surface‐guided RT and image‐guided RT (IGRT) system for patient positioning, monitoring, and tumor targeting, was introduced in clinical practice. The purpose of this study was to provide more information about the geometric accuracy of EXTD and its workflow in a clinical environment. The surface optical/thermal‐ and the stereoscopic X‐ray imaging positioning systems of EXTD was evaluated and compared to cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT). Additionally, the congruence with the radiation isocenter was tested. A Winston Lutz test was executed several times over 1 year, and repeated end‐to‐end positioning tests were performed. The magnitude of the displacements between all systems, CBCT, stereoscopic X‐ray, optical‐surface imaging, and MV portal imaging was within the submillimeter range, suggesting that the image guidance provided by EXTD is accurate at any couch angle. Additionally, results from the evaluation of 14 patients with intracranial tumors treated with open‐face masks are reported, and limited differences with a maximum of 0.02 mm between optical/thermal‐ and stereoscopic X‐ray imaging were found. As the optical/thermal positioning system showed a comparable accuracy to other IGRT systems, and due to its constant monitoring capability, it can be an efficient tool for detecting intra‐fractional motion and for real‐time tracking of the surface position during RT.

Purpose or Objective To provide a comprehensive recurrence and toxicity analysis of patients treated with radiotherapy alone for stage I/II (Ann-Arbor classification) indolent orbital lymphoma. Material and Methods We retrospectively reviewed the medical charts of 46 patients (and 51 orbits) treated at our centre with radiotherapy between 1995 and 2012 for biopsy-proven stage I/IIE primary orbital lymphomas. We evaluated treatment response and performed a comprehensive toxicity analysis with correlation to delivered radiation dose. Results At diagnosis, the median age was 63.5 years (range: 20-92). At initial diagnosis 43 and 3 patients had unilateral, synchronous bilateral involvement while there were 2 cases of contralateral metachronous failure. The predominant histological subtype was extranodal marginal zone lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma in 42 (91.3%), follicular in 1 (2.2%), lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma in 1 (2.2%) and other indolent histology in 2 (4.3%) patients. Most lymphomas were located in the conjunctiva (18/35.3%) or eyelids (18/35.3%). Thirty-eight (82.6%) patients presented with stage I while 8/46 (17.4%) with stage II disease. The median radiation dose was 39.6 Gy (range: 21.6-48.6 Gy) delivered in 1.8-2 Gy single fractions. At a median follow-up of 83 months (range: 7-258 months), the complete remission rate was 98%. A local relapse was observed in 2/51 (3.9%) orbits and 4/46 (8.7%) patients had systemic relapse. The 5- and 10-year PFS rates were 79.2% (95% CI: 73.0%-85.4%) and 67.6% (95% CI: 59.4%-75.8%); 5- and 10-year OS was 83.6% (95% CI: 77.9%-89.3%) and 76.5% (95% CI: 69.4%-83.6%), respectively. In total, 66 acute toxicity events (all-grade) were observed: 5/51 (9.8%) >= G2 acute conjunctivitis, 2/51 (3.9%) cases of G2 acute keratitis, 1/51 (2%) cases of >= G2 ophthalmagia and 12/51 (23.5%) cases of >= G2 xerophthalmia. Furthermore, 45 chronic adverse events were observed in 34/51 (66.7%) irradiated orbits with 30 late adverse events attributed to cataract. Conclusion Our analysis confirms the role of radiotherapy alone at lower doses in the treatment of indolent orbital lymphomas. Further research is required to assess the efficacy of ultra-low-dose radiotherapy and anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies to further mitigate long-term sequelae.

Die Behandlung von älteren Patientinnen mit primärem Mammakarzinom weicht im klinischen Alltag häufig von den interdisziplinären Therapieempfehlungen ab. Die Therapieentscheidungen werden dabei nicht ausschließlich von den tumorspezifischen Charakteristika, sondern auch von anderen Faktoren wie Komorbiditäten, zu erwartenden Nebenwirkungen und Patientenpräferenz beeinflusst. Ziel der vorliegenden Studie war es, die Versorgungsrealität und das onkologische Ergebnis der Strahlentherapie (RT) bei älteren Patientinnen (> 65 Jahre) zu evaluieren, die in einem modernen klinischen Umfeld außerhalb von klinischen Studien behandelt wurden.

Purpose: Due to its close vicinity to critical structures, especially the spinal cord, standards for safety for spine stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) should be high. This study was conducted, to evaluate intrafractional motion during spine SBRT for patients without individualized immobilization (e.g., vacuum cushions) using high accuracy patient monitoring via orthogonal X-ray imaging. Methods: Intrafractional X-ray data were collected from 29 patients receiving 79 fractions of spine SBRT. No individualized immobilization devices were used during the treatment. Intrafractional motion was monitored using the ExacTrac Dynamic (ETD) System (Brainlab AG, Munich, Germany). Deviations were detected in six degrees of freedom (6 DOF). Tolerances for repositioning were 0.7 mm for translational and 0.5° for rotational deviations. Patients were repositioned when the tolerance levels were exceeded. Results: Out of the 925 pairs of stereoscopic X-ray images examined, 138 (15 %) showed at least one deviation exceeding the predefined tolerance values. In all 6 DOF together, a total of 191 deviations out of tolerance were recorded. The frequency of deviations exceeding the tolerance levels varied among patients but occurred in all but one patient. Deviations out of tolerance could be seen in all 6 DOF. Maximum translational deviations were 2.6 mm, 2.3 mm and 2.8 mm in the lateral, longitudinal and vertical direction. Maximum rotational deviations were 1.8°, 2.6° and 1.6° for pitch, roll and yaw, respectively. Translational deviations were more frequent than rotational ones, and frequency and magnitude of deviations showed an inverse correlation. Conclusion: Intrafractional motion detection and patient repositioning during spine SBRT using X-ray imaging via the ETD System can lead to improved safety during the application of high BED in critical locations. When using intrafractional imaging with low thresholds for re-positioning individualized immobilization devices (e.g. vacuum cushions) may be omitted.

Purpose Frequency and risk profile of radiation necrosis (RN) in patients with glioma undergoing either upfront stereotactic brachytherapy (SBT) and additional salvage external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) after tumor recurrence or vice versa remains unknown. Methods Patients with glioma treated with low-activity temporary iodine-125 SBT at the University of Munich between 1999 and 2016 who had either additional upfront or salvage EBRT were included. Biologically effective doses (BED) were calculated. RN was diagnosed using stereotactic biopsy and/or metabolic imaging. The rate of RN was estimated with the Kaplan Meier method. Risk factors were obtained from logistic regression models. Results Eighty-six patients (49 male, 37 female, median age 47 years) were included. 38 patients suffered from low-grade and 48 from high-grade glioma. Median follow-up was 15 months after second treatment. Fifty-eight patients received upfront EBRT (median total dose: 60 Gy), and 28 upfront SBT (median reference dose: 54 Gy, median dose rate: 10.0 cGy/h). Median time interval between treatments was 19 months. RN was diagnosed in 8/75 patients. The 1- and 2-year risk of RN was 5.1% and 11.7%, respectively. Tumor volume and irradiation time of SBT, number of implanted seeds, and salvage EBRT were risk factors for RN. Neither of the BED values nor the time interval between both treatments gained prognostic influence. Conclusion The combination of upfront EBRT and salvage SBT or vice versa is feasible for glioma patients. The risk of RN is mainly determined by the treatment volume but not by the interval between therapies.

Aim: We investigated blood parameters in patients with inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to predict individual outcomes after definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Patients and Methods: Blood parameters of consecutive patients undergoing definitive CRT between 2010 and 2016 for inoperable stage III NSCLC before multimodal treatment and at first follow-up were measured and analyzed. Results: Blood parameters from 99 patients were evaluated. Histologically, about 50% of patients had an adenocarcinoma. All patients received platinum-based sequential or concurrent CRT. The median total dose to the primary tumor was 60 (range=48-70) Gy. On multivariate analysis after adjustment for all co-founders, median overall survival for pre-treatment cutoffs were: lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) >250 U/l was 17 vs. 27 months [hazard ratio (HR)=2.05, 95% confidence intervaI (CI)=1.15-3.66; p=0.015], thrombocytosis >400×106/l: 11 vs. 23 months (HR=2.75, 95% CI=1.1-6.88; p=0.03), hypoalbuminemia <3.5 g/dl: 12 vs. 24 months (HR=2.42, 95% CI=1.21-4.84; p=0.013) and post-treatment neutrophilia >7×106/l: 12 vs. 27 months (HR=2.5, 95% CI=1.21-5.17; p=0.013). Conclusion: Pre-treatment elevated LDH, thrombocytosis, hypoalbuminemia and post-treatment neutrophilia were associated with significantly worse overall survival in patients with inoperable stage III NSCLC treated with CRT. Patients with both pre-therapeutic elevated LDH and hypoalbuminemia demonstrated a dismal prognosis despite completion of multimodal treatment.

Background Patients with left-sided breast cancer have an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) after radiotherapy (RT). While the awareness of cardiac toxicity has increased enormously over the last decade, the role of individual baseline cardiac risks has not yet been systematically investigated. Aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of baseline CVD risks on radiation-induced cardiac toxicity. Methods Two hundred ten patients with left-sided breast cancer treated in the prospective Save-Heart Study using a deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) technique were analysed regarding baseline risk factors for CVD. Three frequently used prediction tools (Procam, Framingham and Reynolds score) were applied to evaluate the individual CVD risk profiles. Moreover, 10-year CVD excess absolute risks (EAR) were estimated using the individual mean heart dose (MHD) of treatment plans in free breathing (FB) and DIBH. Results The individual baseline CVD risk factors had a strong impact on the 10-year cumulative CVD risk. The mean baseline risks of the non-diabetic cohort ( n = 200) ranged from 3.11 to 3.58%, depending on the risk estimation tool. A large number of the non-diabetic patients had a very low 10-year CVD baseline risk of ≤1%; nevertheless, 8–9% of patients reached ≥10% baseline 10-year CVD risk. In contrast, diabetic patients ( n = 10) had significantly higher baseline CVD risks (range: 11.76–24.23%). The mean 10-year cumulative risk (Framingham score) following RT was 3.73% using the DIBH-technique (MHD:1.42Gy) and 3.94% in FB (MHD:2.33Gy), after adding a 10-year-EAR of + 0.34%(DIBH) and + 0.55%(FB) to the baseline risks, respectively. Smoking status was one of the most important and modifiable baseline risk factors. After DIBH-RT, the 182 non-smoking patients had a mean 10-year cumulative risk of 3.55% (3.20% baseline risk, 0.35% EAR) as compared to 6.07% (5.60% baseline risk, 0.47% EAR) for the 28 smokers. Conclusion In the present study, all CVD prediction tools showed comparable results and could easily be integrated into daily clinical practice. A systematic evaluation and screening helps to identify high-risk patients who may benefit from primary prevention. This could result in an even higher benefit than from heart-sparing irradiation techniques alone.

Objective The impact of optical surface guidance on the use of portal imaging and the initial set-up duration in patients receiving postoperative radiotherapy of the breast or chest wall was investigated. Material and methods A retrospective analysis was performed including breast cancer patients who received postoperative radiotherapy between January 2016 and December 2016. One group of patients received treatment before the optical surface scanner was installed (no-OSS) and the other group was positioned using the additional information derived by the optical surface scanner (OSS). The duration of the initial set-up was recorded for each patient and a comparison of both groups was performed. Accordingly, the differences between planned and actually acquired portal images during the course of radiotherapy were compared between both groups. Results A total of 180 breast cancer patients were included (90 no-OSS, 90 OSS) in this analysis. Of these, 30 patients with left-sided breast cancer received radiotherapy in deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH). The mean set-up time was 10 min and 18 s and no significant difference between the two groups of patients was found (p = 0.931). The mean set-up time in patients treated without DIBH was 9 min and 45 s compared to 13 min with DIBH (p< 0.001), as portal imaging was performed in DIBH. No significant difference was found in the number of acquired to the planned number of portal images during the entire radiotherapy treatment for both groups (p = 0.287). Conclusion Optical surface imaging is a valuable addition for primary patient set-up. The findings confirm that the addition of surface-based imaging did not prolong the clinical workflow and had no significant impact on the number of portal verification images carried out during the course of radiotherapy.

Due to the rarity of male breast cancer (male BC), no consensus has been reached regarding the most appropriate curative treatment strategy. The objective of the present observational study was to identify patient and tumor characteristics and assess the role of radiotherapy (RT) in clinical practice.

ResultsEighty-six patients (49 male, 37 female), with a median age of 47 years were included. Median follow-up was 15.0 months after second irradiation treatment. Fifty-eight patients received upfront EBRT (median total dose: 60Gy), and 28 patients upfront SBT (median reference dose: 54Gy, median dose rate: 10.0 cGy/h). The median time interval between both treatments was 19 months. In 8/75 (10.7%) patients a radiation necrosis was diagnosed. The one-and two-year risk of radiation necrosis was 5.1% and 11.7%, respectively. The logistic regression models indicated tumor volume of SBT (Fig. a), irradiation time of SBT (Fig. b), number of implanted seeds, and salvage EBRT as significant risk factors for radiation necrosis. Neither of the BED values nor the time interval between both treatments gained prognostic influence.

Information: www. dgp2018. de Information: oncoplasticbc. org/Information: www. if-kongress. de Information: www. ecco-org. eu Information: www. medical-communications. de/home Information: www. charite-repetitorium. de Information: www. eickeler. org Information: www. igcs2018. com Information: www. medconcept. org Information: www. medconcept. org Information: www. wild-west-symposium. de Information: mci-academy. de/rms2018/Information: www. radiologie. uk-erlangen. de/aktuelles/veranstaltungen Information: www. medacad. org/senologie2018/Information: www. haematologie-onkologie-2018. com Information: http://bit. ly/2D47SIg

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of postoperative radiotherapy after breast conserving surgery (BCS) in DCIS in a large patient population treated in clinical practice.

Purpose: Aim of the current comparative modelling study was to estimate the individual radiation-induced risk for death of ischaemic heart disease (IHD) under free breathing (FB) and deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) in a real-world population. Materials and methods: Eighty-nine patients with left-sided early breast cancer were enrolled in the prospective SAVE-HEART study. For each patient three-dimensional conformal treatment plans were created in FB and DIBH and corresponding radiation-induced risks of IHD mortality were estimated based on expected survival, individual IHD risk factors and the relative radiation-induced risk. Results: With the use of DIBH, mean heart doses were reduced by 35% (interquartile range: 23-46%) as compared to FB. Mean expected years of life lost (YLL) due to radiation-induced IHD mortality were 0.11 years in FB, and 0.07 years in DIBH. YLL were remarkably independent of age at treatment in patients with a favourable tumour prognosis. DIBH led to more pronounced reductions in YLL in patients with high baseline risk (0.08 years for upper vs 0.02 years for lower quartile), with favourable tumour prognosis (0.05 years for patients without vs 0.02 years for those with lymph-node involvement), and in patients with high mean heart doses in FB (0.09 years for doses >3 Gy vs 0.02 years for doses <1.5 Gy). Conclusion: Ideally, the DIBH technique should be offered to all patients with left-sided breast cancer. However, highest benefits are expected for patients with a favourable tumour prognosis, high mean heart dose or high baseline IHD risk, independent of their age. (C) 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Erstlinientherapie in Kombination mit Le- trozol das mediane progressionsfreie Über- leben gegenüber Placebo plus Letrozol um ungefähr 13 Monate verlängerte. Ein signifi- kanter Vorteil, der sich über alle Subgruppen hinweg zeigte (Tab. 1). Solche exakten Daten können wir in der klinischen Praxis natürlich nicht generieren. Aber wir beobachten bei den zahlreichen Frauen, die wir seit 2016 mit Pal- bociclib behandelt haben, eine große Anzahl, die bis heute eine stabile Erkrankung aufweist … Wie sind Ihre Erfahrungen bei prä- oder perimenopausalen Frauen? Sie bekommen, gemäß Zulassung, zusätz- lich ein Gonadotropin-Releasing-Hormon (GnRH)-Analogon, und sind damit funk- tionell postmenopausal. Daher sehen wir zwischen diesen Patientengruppen keiner- lei Differenz in Bezug auf Wirksamkeit und Nebenwirkungen … Welche Nebenwirkungen beobachten Sie im Klinikalltag? Die in …

Radiation therapy (RT) for breast cancer has dramatically changed over the past years, leading to individualized risk-adapted treatment strategies. Historically, the choice of RT regimen was limited to conventional fractionation protocols using standard tangential fields. Nowadays, technological and technical improvements in modern RT have added a variety of other RT modalities, different fractionation schedules, and individualised treatment volumes to the portfolio of breast RT. This review aims to give a short overview on the main topics which have recently found their way into clinical practice: hypofractionated treatment protocols, accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) for low-risk patients, deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) for maximal heart protection, extent of regional nodal irradiation for high-risk patients, and the implementation of new radiation techniques such as intensity modulated RT (IMRT) and volumetric modulated RT (VMAT).

Aim of the present analysis was to evaluate the movement and dose variability of the different lymph node levels of node-positive breast cancer patients during adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) with regional nodal irradiation (RNI) in deep-inspiration breath hold (DIBH).