22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11DS) markedly increases risk of psychiatric disorders, including anxiety and mood disorders, and is associated with a spectrum of cognitive impairment, from borderline functioning to intellectual disability, with cognitive decline frequently reported. Despite widespread use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in 22q11DS, evidence regarding their safety, effectiveness, and potential effects on cognitive trajectories remains limited. We conducted a retrospective, observational multicenter study across nine international centers, including cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. In the cross-sectional sample of 190 SSRI-treated individuals with 22q11DS (6–56 years), retrospective data on SSRI type, indication, perceived effectiveness, and side effects were analyzed descriptively (40–190 cases across variables). In the longitudinal analyses, intellectual quotient (IQ) trajectories were compared between 101 SSRI-treated and 213 SSRI-untreated participants (4–34 years) using mixed-model regression analyses. SSRIs were mainly prescribed for mood and/or anxiety disorders (94

BACKGROUND:Movement disorders have recently emerged as important neurologic manifestations of the 22q11.2 microdeletion that affects nearly one in every 2000 live births. OBJECTIVE:We aimed to map the existing evidence regarding the spectrum, diagnosis and treatment, and etiopathogenesis of movement disorders associated with 22q11.2 microdeletion, highlight key gaps, and provide recommendations for future research. METHODS:We conducted a comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and reference lists to identify relevant clinical and preclinical studies, and summarize data on clinico-pathologic features, risk factors, and pathophysiology of movement disorders associated with molecularly defined 22q11.2 microdeletions. RESULTS:Forty-three (clinical: n = 41/43, 95%; preclinical: n = 2/43, 5%) studies met eligibility criteria. Most clinical studies (35/41, 85%) involved adults, of which 51% (21/41) were case series/reports, and the remainder observational studies. Key findings included: (1) emphasis on parkinsonism but emerging evidence for multiple other motor phenotypes, (2) non-specific findings on routine neuroimaging, albeit with promising early results of certain modalities (eg, volumetric analyses, molecular imaging) and fluid-based biomarkers, particularly for parkinsonism, and (3) multifaceted etiologic and pathophysiologic processes beyond those attributable to medication side effects. Prevailing gaps include research design limitations, heterogeneity of diagnostic methods, and limited systematic data on etiopathogenesis and treatments. CONCLUSIONS:Current evidence supports an expanding spectrum of motor phenotypes associated with 22q11.2 microdeletion, with emerging data reporting potentially useful clinical markers and non-drug-related risk modifiers and underlying mechanisms. Addressing prevailing gaps will require enhanced research designs with up-to-date diagnostic and genetic methodologies, robust preclinical models, and cross-disciplinary collaborations.

BACKGROUND:22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2DS) has been associated with increased risk of early-onset Parkinson's disease (PD). OBJECTIVE:To determine the prevalence and predictors of PD in a large international 22q11.2DS sample. METHODS:The sample comprised 856 adults (median age 28 (range 16-76) years; 53.0% female). PD was defined as clinical diagnosis by a neurologist (including bradykinesia, rest tremor and/or rigidity). Age-specific risk and predictors of PD were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curve and Cox regression. RESULTS:PD was present in 1.8% (95% CI: 0.9-2.6%) of the sample, 3.4% (95% CI: 2.2-4.6%) when including uncertain PD (clinical diagnosis or suspicion, but not meeting all criteria), and 14.0% (95% CI: 6.9-21.0%) of those aged ≥50 years. Median age at motor onset was 45 (range 20-66) years. None of the factors considered were associated with PD. CONCLUSIONS:Given high PD prevalence and young onset, we propose periodic motor evaluations from age 40 years in 22q11.2DS.

This study is aimed at determining the spectrum of congenital heart disease associated with distal 22q11.22-23 deletions flanked by low copy repeats, LCR22 D-H. We analyzed cardiology findings in 128 unrelated individuals with distal LCR22 D-H deletions. A total of 62 were newly described and 66 were derived from previous reports. We found that deletions which included LCR22-D as the proximal endpoint were the most prevalent in the cohort (104/128, 81.3%). Clinically relevant congenital heart disease was identified in 48 individuals (37.5%, 95% CI 29%-46%), which is lower than the prevalence reported for typical, proximal LCR22 A-D deletions (p = 3.7E-4), especially for conotruncal defects (13/128, 10.2%; p = 7.1E-13). Mild to moderate CHD predominated, including ventricular septal defects (22/128), bicuspid aortic valve (9/128) and mild cardiomyopathy (3/128). Persistent truncus arteriosus was the most prevalent (n = 8/13) conotruncal heart defect, but other anomalies also occurred in singleton cases. These findings support the need for cardiac evaluation in all individuals with distal 22q11.22-23 deletions, increased use of clinical genetic testing in syndromic individuals with these findings, and molecular studies in model systems. The results demonstrate that reduced gene dosage of distal 22q11.21-23, particularly within the D-E region including MAPK1 and HIC2 convey risk for CHD.

Background and PurposeMovement disorders are increasingly recognized as late-occurring neurologic manifestations of 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2DS). We aimed to dissect the spectrum of relevant movement disorders in 22q11.2DS, including clinical and electrophysiologic presentations and effective therapies.MethodsRetrospective review of medical records, medication histories, and videotaped examinations was conducted in 31 unrelated adults (55% female) diagnosed with 22q11.2DS and a movement disorder who were seen at a major center of excellence from June 1996 to September 2023. Between-group comparisons were performed to explore the influence of medications on movement disorder presentations.ResultsThe median age at movement disorder onset was 35.5 (IQR: 22.0) years. Non-parkinsonian tremor was the most common phenotype (21/31, 68%), followed by parkinsonism (13/31, 42%), dystonia (11/31, 36%), myoclonus (9/31, 29%), dyskinesia (6/31, 19%), stereotypies, and functional movement disorders (4/31, 13% each). The majority of patients (24/31, 77%) presented with two or more movement disorder phenotypes (median 3, range: 2-7). Similar trends in prevalence emerged after accounting for antipsychotic exposure and potential drug-related movement disorders. Electrophysiological assessments identified both previously described and novel motor phenotypes. Treatment data for at least one movement disorder (available for 20/31, 65%) indicated a positive response to standard phenotype-based interventions.ConclusionsWe demonstrate that movement disorders in adults with 22q11.2DS exhibit greater clinical complexity than previously reported, which could reflect innate vulnerability and pathologic mechanisms beyond medication side effects. In those with a confirmed 22q11.2 microdeletion, periodic neurologic evaluations, supported by electrophysiologic investigations, enable accurate diagnosis and implementation of personalized management strategies.

Clinical features of 22q11.2 microdeletion syndrome (22q11.2DS) are highly variable between affected individuals and frequently include a subset of conotruncal and aortic arch anomalies. Many are diagnosed with 22q11.2DS when they present as a fetus, newborn or infant with characteristic cardiac findings and subsequently undergo genetic testing. The presence of an aortic arch anomaly with characteristic intracardiac anomalies increases the likelihood that the patient has 22q11.2 DS, but those with an aortic arch anomaly and normal intracardiac anatomy are also at risk. It is particularly important to identify the fetus at risk for 22q11.2DS in order to prepare the expectant parents and plan postnatal care for optimal outcomes. Fetal anatomy scans now readily identify aortic arch anomalies (aberrant right subclavian artery, right sided aortic arch or double aortic arch) in the three-vessel tracheal view. Given the association of 22q11.2DS with aortic arch anomalies with and without intracardiac defects, this review highlights the importance of recognizing the fetus at risk for 22q11.2 deletion syndrome with an aortic arch anomaly and details current methods for genetic testing. To assist in the prenatal diagnosis of 22q11.2DS, this review summarizes the seminal features of 22q11.2DS, its prenatal presentation and current methods for genetic testing. What is already known about this topic?Patients with a 22q11.2 microdeletion commonly have a subset of cardiac defects including tetralogy of Fallot, truncus arteriosus, interrupted aortic arch and conoventricular septal defects. It is a well-established practice to counsel parents about the possibility of and test for a 22q11.2 deletion in the fetus diagnosed with one of these cardiac defects and/or other characteristic features of 22q11.2 deletion syndrome.What does this review add?In addition to intracardiac defects, fetal anatomy scans now readily identify aortic arch anomalies (e.g. aberrant right subclavian artery, right sided aortic arch) in the three-vessel tracheal view. Given the association of 22q11.2 microdeletion syndrome with aortic arch anomalies, this review highlights the importance of recognizing the fetus at risk for 22q11.2DS with an aortic arch anomaly but normal intracardiac anatomy and details current methods for genetic testing.

Background: Individuals with genetic neurodevelopmental disorders (GNDs) or intellectual disability (ID) are often affected by complex neuropsychiatric comorbidities. Targeted treatments are increasingly available, but due to the heterogeneity of these patient populations, choosing a key outcome and corresponding outcome measurement instrument remains challenging. Objectives: The aim of this scoping review was to describe the research on outcomes and instruments used in clinical trials in GNDs and ID. Eligibility criteria: Clinical trials in individuals with GNDs and ID for any intervention over the past 10 years were included in the review. Sources of evidence: MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched. Titles and abstracts were independently screened for eligibility with a subsample of 10% double-screening for interrater reliability. Data from full texts were independently reviewed. Discrepancies were discussed until consensus was reached. Charting methods: Information was recorded on patient populations, interventions, designs, outcomes, measurement instruments, and type of reporter when applicable. Qualitative and descriptive analyses were performed. Results: We included 312 studies reporting 91 different outcomes, with cognitive function most frequently measured (28%). Various outcome measurement instruments ( n = 457) were used, with 288 in only a single clinical trial. There were 18 genetic condition-specific instruments and 16 measures were designed ad-hoc for one particular trial. Types of report included proxy-report (39%), self-report (22%), clinician-report (16%), observer-report (6%), self-assisted report (1%), or unknown (16%). Conclusion: This scoping review of current practice reveals a myriad of outcomes and outcome measurement instruments for clinical trials in GNDs and ID. This complicates generalization, evidence synthesis, and evaluation. It underlines the need for consensus on suitability, validity, and relevancy of instruments, ultimately resulting in a core outcome set. A series of steps is proposed to move from the myriad of measures to a more unified approach.

Background 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2DS) is associated with cognitive impairments and an increased risk of psychopathology. Most of the research has been conducted in children and adolescents, although the majority of affected individuals live well into adulthood. Hence, limited data are available on functional outcomes in adults. Aims To provide more insight in cognitive and adaptive abilities, and daily life functioning (marital status, living situation and work situation) in adults with 22q11.2DS. Method This retrospective study included 250 Dutch-speaking adults (16-69 years) with 22q11.2DS from three sites in The Netherlands and Belgium. Data on full-scale IQ (FSIQ) scores (assessed with the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale), adaptive functioning (assessed with the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale II), and functional outcomes including marital status, living and work situation were systematically collected from clinical files. In addition, we examined predictors of adaptive functioning. Results The majority of individuals in our adult sample demonstrated a low level of adaptive functioning (65%). In contrast to previous findings in children and adolescents, the majority functioned at an intellectual disability level (56%). Male sex, lower FSIQ and autism spectrum disorder were predictors of lower adaptive functioning (P = 0.016, P <0.001 and P = 0.16, respectively). Conclusions These results suggest that low levels of cognitive and adaptive functioning are common in adults with 22q11.2DS. Future longitudinal and multicentre studies including older patients (>40 years) are needed to further investigate cognitive and adaptive trajectories and their interactions with physical and psychiatric comorbidities.

Background Many rare genetic neurodevelopmental disorders (RGNDs) are characterized by intellectual disability (ID), severe cognitive and behavioral impairments, potentially diagnosed as a comorbid autism spectrum disorder or attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Quality of life is often impaired due to irritability, aggression and self-injurious behavior, generally refractory to standard therapies. There are indications from previous (case) studies and patient reporting that cannabidiol (CBD) may be an effective treatment for severe behavioral manifestations in RGNDs. However, clear evidence is lacking and interventional research is challenging due to the rarity as well as the heterogeneity within and between disease groups and interindividual differences in treatment response. Our objective is to examine the effectiveness of CBD on severe behavioral manifestations in three RGNDs, including Tuberous Sclerosis Complex (TSC), mucopolysaccharidosis type III (MPS III), and Fragile X syndrome (FXS), using an innovative trial design. Methods We aim to conduct placebo-controlled, double-blind, block-randomized, multiple crossover N -of- 1 studies with oral CBD (twice daily) in 30 patients (aged ≥ 6 years) with confirmed TSC, MPS III or FXS and severe behavioral manifestations. The treatment is oral CBD up to a maximum of 25 mg/kg/day, twice daily. The primary outcome measure is the subscale irritability of the Aberrant Behavior Checklist. Secondary outcome measures include (personalized) patient-reported outcome measures with regard to behavioral and psychiatric outcomes, disease-specific outcome measures, parental stress, seizure frequency, and adverse effects of CBD. Questionnaires will be completed and study medication will be taken at the participants’ natural setting. Individual treatment effects will be determined based on summary statistics. A mixed model analysis will be applied for analyzing the effectiveness of the intervention per disorder and across disorders combining data from the individual N -of- 1 trials. Discussion These N -of- 1 trials address an unmet medical need and will provide information on the effectiveness of CBD for severe behavioral manifestations in RGNDs, potentially generating generalizable knowledge at an individual-, disorder- and RGND population level. Trial registration EudraCT: 2021-003250-23, registered 25 August 2022, https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2021-003250-23/NL .

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:Knowledge of young-onset Alzheimer disease in adults with Down syndrome has greatly improved clinical care. However, little is known about dementia in rare genetic neurodevelopmental disorders (RGNDs). In this review, a comprehensive overview is provided of reports on dementia and cognitive/adaptive trajectories in adults with RGNDs. METHODS:A systematic literature review was conducted in Embase, Medline ALL, and PsycINFO on December 6, 2022. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021223041). Search terms for dementia, cognitive and adaptive functioning, and RGNDs were combined using generic terms and the Orphanet database. Study characteristics and descriptive data on genetic diagnosis, clinical and neuropathologic features, comorbidities, and diagnostic methods were extracted using a modified version of the Cochrane Data Extraction Template. RESULTS:The literature search yielded 40 publications (17 cohorts, 23 case studies) describing dementia and/or cognitive or adaptive trajectories in adults with 14 different RGNDs. Dementia was reported in 49 individuals (5 cohorts, 20 cases) with a mean age at onset of 44.4 years. Diagnostics were not disclosed for half of the reported individuals (n = 25/49, 51.0%). A total of 44 different psychodiagnostic instruments were used. MRI was the most reported additional investigation (n = 12/49, 24.5%). Comorbid disorders most frequently associated with cognitive/adaptive decline were epilepsy, psychotic disorders, and movement disorders. DISCUSSION:Currently available literature shows limited information on aging in RGNDs, with relatively many reports of young-onset dementia. Longitudinal data may provide insights into converging neurodevelopmental degenerative pathways. We provide recommendations to optimize dementia screening, diagnosis, and research.

OBJECTIVE:One in every 4 individuals born with a 22q11.2 microdeletion will develop schizophrenia. Thirty years of clinical genetic testing capability have enabled detection of this major molecular susceptibility for psychotic illness. However, there is limited literature on the treatment of schizophrenia in individuals with a 22q11.2 microdeletion, particularly regarding the issue of treatment resistance. METHODS:From a large, well-characterized adult cohort with a typical 22q11.2 microdeletion followed for up to 25 years at a specialty clinic, we studied all 107 adults (49 females, 45.8%) meeting the criteria for schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. We performed a comprehensive review of lifetime (1,801 patient-years) psychiatric records to determine treatments used and the prevalence of treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS). We used Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) scores to compare within-individual responses to clozapine and nonclozapine antipsychotics. For a subgroup with contemporary data (n = 88, 82.2%), we examined antipsychotics and dosage at the last follow-up. RESULTS:Lifetime treatments involved on average 4 different antipsychotic medications per individual. Sixty-three (58.9%) individuals met the study criteria for TRS, a significantly greater proportion than for a community-based comparison (42.9%; χ2 = 10.38, df = 1, p < 0.01). The non-TRS group was enriched for individuals with genetic diagnosis before schizophrenia diagnosis. Within-person treatment response in TRS was significantly better for clozapine than for nonclozapine antipsychotics (p < 0.0001). At the last follow-up, clozapine was the most common antipsychotic prescribed, followed by olanzapine, risperidone, and paliperidone. Total antipsychotic chlorpromazine equivalent dosages were in typical clinical ranges (median: 450 mg; interquartile range: 300, 750 mg). CONCLUSION:The results for this large sample indicate that patients with 22q11.2 microdeletion have an increased propensity to treatment resistance. The findings provide evidence about how genetic diagnosis can inform clinical psychiatric management and could help reduce treatment delays. Further research is needed to shed light on the pathophysiology of antipsychotic response and on strategies to optimize outcomes. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY TITLE:Real-world treatment of schizophrenia in adults with a 22q11.2 microdeletion.

Abstract Background Advances in understanding the etiology of intellectual disability (ID) has led to insights in potential (targeted) treatments and personalized care. Implications of ID on health are often complex and require a multidisciplinary approach. The aim was to investigate the reporting of genetic diagnoses in multidisciplinary ID care and to identify associated clinical and demographic factors. Methods A retrospective chart review was performed on a randomly selected sample of individuals (n = 380) of a large ID care organization in the Netherlands. Data on genetic etiology, including genetic testing and diagnoses, and clinical and demographic characteristics were collected from files held by multidisciplinary team members. Results Reports on genetic etiology were available in 40% of the study sample (n = 151), with a genetic diagnosis recorded in 34% (n = 51), which is 13% of the total sample. In those with reported genetic diagnoses, this was reported in 90% of medical, 39% of psychodiagnostic, and 75% of professional caregivers’ files. Older age, mild ID, and the legal representative not being a family member were associated with less reported information on genetic etiology. Conclusions This study revealed that genetic diagnoses were often not reported in ID care files. Recommendations were formulated to reduce delay in diagnosis, and enable personalized care for individuals with ID.

Objective: One in every 4 individuals born with a 22q11.2 microdeletion will develop schizophrenia. Thirty years of clinical genetic testing capability have enabled detection of this major molecular susceptibility for psychotic illness. However, there is limited literature on the treatment of schizophrenia in individuals with a 22q11.2 microdeletion, particularly regarding the issue of treatment resistance. Methods: From a large, well-characterized adult cohort with a typical 22q11.2 microdeletion followed for up to 25 years at a specialty clinic, we studied all 107 adults (49 females, 45.8%) meeting the criteria for schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. We performed a comprehensive review of lifetime (1,801 patient-years) psychiatric records to determine treatments used and the prevalence of treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS). We used Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) scores to compare within-individual responses to clozapine and nonclozapine antipsychotics. For a subgroup with contemporary data (n = 88, 82.2%), we examined antipsychotics and dosage at the last follow-up. Results: Lifetime treatments involved on average 4 different antipsychotic medications per individual. Sixty-three (58.9%) individuals met the study criteria for TRS, a significantly greater proportion than for a community-based comparison (42.9%; chi(2) = 10.38, df = 1, p < 0.01). The non-TRS group was enriched for individuals with genetic diagnosis before schizophrenia diagnosis. Within-person treatment response in TRS was significantly better for clozapine than for nonclozapine antipsychotics (p < 0.0001). At the last follow-up, clozapine was the most common antipsychotic prescribed, followed by olanzapine, risperidone, and paliperidone. Total antipsychotic chlorpromazine equivalent dosages were in typical clinical ranges (median: 450 mg; interquartile range: 300, 750 mg). Conclusion: The results for this large sample indicate that patients with 22q11.2 microdeletion have an increased propensity to treatment resistance. The findings provide evidence about how genetic diagnosis can inform clinical psychiatric management and could help reduce treatment delays. Further research is needed to shed light on the pathophysiology of antipsychotic response and on strategies to optimize outcomes.

Objective: Copy number variations (CNVs) may contribute to medical conditions. However, research on the impact of individual CNVs on endocrine disease is limited. This study aimed to provide new data on obesity and metabolic syndrome (MetS) in adults with microdeletion 22q11.2, the pathogenic CNV associated with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. Methods: We examined prevalence rates of obesity and MetS in 103 adults with a typical 22q11.2 deletion (45.2% male, at median age 30.0 (range 17-71) years) and compared these rates with population-based data. Generalized obesity was defined by a body mass index (BMI) >= 30 kg/m(2), abdominal obesity by a waist circumference (WC) of >= 102 cm in males and >= 88 cm in females, and MetS by standard Joint Interim Statement criteria. General linear models were used to examine the independent associations of age, sex, congenital heart defect, smoking, and antipsychotic use with BMI, WC, and the presence of MetS. Results: Prevalence rates of generalized obesity (32.0%), abdominal obesity (51.5%), and MetS (33.0%) were significantly higher compared to a population-based cohort (15.7% (P < 0.0001), 36.1% (P = 0.002), and 15.2% (P < 0.0001), respectively). In antipsychotic na & iuml;ve subjects, significant correlations were observed between age and BMI (r = 0.54, P < 0.001), and age and WC (r = 0.60, P < 0.001). These correlations were not present in individuals taking antipsychotic medication. The models predicting BMI (F(5, 97) = 3.083, R-2 = 0.137, P = 0.01) and WC (F(5, 92) = 5.985, R-2 = 0.245, P < 0.001) were significant. Only age was individually predictive of outcomes (P < 0.05 and P < 0.001). The model predicting MetS was also significant (P < 0.001), with higher age being the only factor associated with MetS (OR = 1.07, 95% CI = 1.03-1.12, P < 0.001). Conclusions: Generalized and abdominal obesity, as well as MetS, appear to be common in adults with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome, emphasizing the importance of careful monitoring from a young age. These findings contribute to the limited knowledge about the association between pathogenic CNVs, obesity, and MetS.