Background. Silent myocardial ischemia is an adverse prognostic marker in patients with coronary disease; however, controlled data on the effect of treatment are sparse and contradictory, and the relations among the occurrence of ST segment depression, drug efficacy, and heart rate are unclear. Methods and Results. Sixty patients with stable coronary artery disease, a positive treadmill exercise test and asymptomatic ST segment depression on ambulatory electrocardiographic recording were assessed in a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial. Treadmill exercise tests and 72-hour electrocardiographic recordings were obtained at the end of two 2-week treatment periods with sustained-release diltiazem 180 mg b.i.d. or equivalent placebo. Episodes of asymptomatic ST depression decreased by 50% or more in 70% of the patients from a median number of 4.5 (range, 0-19) to 1.5 (range, 0-13) (p=0.0001); their cumulative duration also decreased from 78.5 (range, 0-60) to 24.5 (range, 0-411) minutes (p=0.001). No circadian variation was found in the efficacy of diltiazem. The occurrence of ischemic type ST segment depression was modulated by changes in heart rate rather than by absolute heart rate. Diltiazem also improved exercise test end points but to a lesser extent. Time to ST segment depression increased to 341±+148 from 296±f154 seconds (p=0.005). Although less frequent with diltiazem administration (45 versus 54 patients, p<0.03), exercise-induced ST depression Was more often asymptomatic (98% versus 72% of patients, p<O.0001). Conclusions. Diltiazem reduces the frequency and severity of ischemic type ST depression in patients with stable coronary artery disease. (Circulation 1991;84:15-22)

PURPOSEThe safety, antiemetic efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of single oral doses of dolasetron, a new highly selective 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, were evaluated in children with cancer undergoing treatment with moderately to highly emetogenic chemotherapy.PATIENTS AND METHODSA total of 32 children, ages 3 to 18 years, were enrolled in a nonrandomized, multicenter, open-label, dose-escalation study. Three oral dose levels (0.6, 1.2, or 1.8 mg/kg) were studied. Safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetic parameters were assessed over 24 hours at each dosage level.RESULTSThe most effective dose was 1.8 mg/kg; 60% of the patients achieved a complete or major response (< or =2 emetic episodes in 24 hours). A complete response was achieved in 3 of 9 patients (33%) who received 0.6 mg/kg, 4 of 13 (31%) patients who received 1.2 mg/kg, and 5 of 10 (50%) patients who received 1.8 mg/kg of dolasetron. Overall, dolasetron was well tolerated. Adverse events were mild and similar to those reported in adults. Peak plasma concentrations (Cmax) of dolasetron's active reduced metabolite, MDL 74,156, were dose proportional and occurred, on the average, within 1 hour of oral administration. The half-life (t1/2) in plasma was approximately 6 hours for all dose levels, and the mean clearance (CLapp) was unrelated to dose.CONCLUSIONSOral dolasetron is safe and effective in reducing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, particularly at the 1.8-mg/kg dose level. These results support further evaluation of oral dolasetron in larger randomized clinical trials in the pediatric cancer population.

BACKGROUNDNausea and vomiting are among the most unpleasant adverse side effects of cancer therapy.PROCEDUREAn open-label dose-escalation study was conducted to assess the appropriate intravenous dose of dolasetron for pediatric patients undergoing chemotherapy. Patients received dolasetron in single intravenous doses of 0.6 (n = 10), 1.2 (n = 12), 1.8 (n = 12), or 2.4 (n = 12) mg/kg 30 min before receiving emetogenic chemotherapy. Pharmacokinetic parameters were evaluated at each dose level and efficacy was evaluated over the first 24 hr following the administration of dolasetron.RESULTSA complete response was achieved in 10% of patients given 0.6 mg/kg, 25% of patients given 1. 2 mg/kg, 67% of patients given 1.8 mg/kg, and 33% of patients given 2.4 mg/kg. Peak plasma concentrations (Cmax) were observed between 0. 33 and 0.75 hr following dolasetron infusion. Cmax and area under plasma concentration-time (AUC) increased with larger doses of dolasetron, while terminal disposition half-life (t1/2) and apparent clearance (Clapp) were not significantly changed with respect to dose. For 1.8-mg/kg dolasetron, the t1/2 was 4.98 hr and the maximum plasma concentration (tmax) 0.47 hr. Adverse events were mild to moderate. No serious events occurred. Conclusions. This study suggests that a single intravenous dose of 1.8 mg/kg is the optimum single intravenous dose for controlling chemotherapy-induced emesis in pediatric patients.

BACKGROUND:Dolasetron mesylate is a selective 5-HT3 receptor antagonist under investigation as an antiemetic in children. Published studies indicate that its antiemetic activity results from the active metabolite (MDL 74,156), which is produced within 10 minutes of administration of dolasetron mesylate. METHODS:The pharmacokinetics of MDL 74,156 and the safety and tolerability of dolasetron mesylate were studied after a single oral or intravenous dose of 1.2 mg.kg-1 dolasetron mesylate to healthy children from 2 to 12 years of age. Oral dolasetron was administered to 12 children 1 to 2 hours before anesthesia. Intravenous dolasteron was administered to 18 children at induction of anesthesia. Serial blood samples were collected for 24 hours after dosing to measure the plasma concentration of MDL 74,156. Indexes of liver and kidney function were determined, and electrocardiograms and adverse events were recorded.

BACKGROUND:Silent myocardial ischemia is an adverse prognostic marker in patients with coronary disease; however, controlled data on the effect of treatment are sparse and contradictory, and the relations among the occurrence of ST segment depression, drug efficacy, and heart rate are unclear.METHODS AND RESULTS:Sixty patients with stable coronary artery disease, a positive treadmill exercise test and asymptomatic ST segment depression on ambulatory electrocardiographic recording were assessed in a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial. Treadmill exercise tests and 72-hour electrocardiographic recordings were obtained at the end of two 2-week treatment periods with sustained-release diltiazem 180 mg b.i.d. or equivalent placebo. Episodes of asymptomatic ST depression decreased by 50% or more in 70% of the patients from a median number of 4.5 (range, 0-19) to 1.5 (range, 0-13) (p = 0.0001); their cumulative duration also decreased from 78.5 (range, 0-60) to 24.5 (range, 0-411) minutes (p = 0.001). No circadian variation was found in the efficacy of diltiazem. The occurrence of ischemic type ST segment depression was modulated by changes in heart rate rather than by absolute heart rate. Diltiazem also improved exercise test end points but to a lesser extent. Time to ST segment depression increased to 341 +/- 148 from 296 +/- 154 seconds (p = 0.005). Although less frequent with diltiazem administration (45 versus 54 patients, p less than 0.03), exercise-induced ST depression was more often asymptomatic (98% versus 72% of patients, p less than 0.0001).CONCLUSIONS:Diltiazem reduces the frequency and severity of ischemic type ST depression in patients with stable coronary artery disease.

The influence of cold on the threshold for myocardial ischemia and the efficacy of antianginal drugs in a cold environment were assessed in 24 patients with stable angina and exercise-induced ST depression. Treadmill exercise tests were done according to a randomized double-blind protocol 90 minutes after administration of placebo, 80 mg propranolol, or 120 mg diltiazem, each at both -8 degrees and 20 degrees C. Eight of the patients were classified by history as cold-sensitive before the study. For the entire group, none of the exercise end points differed significantly between cold and normal temperatures with placebo. However, cold-sensitive patients developed 1 mm ST depression 30% sooner (169 +/- 41 versus 244 +/- 38 seconds, p less than 0.01) at -8 degrees C compared with 20 degrees C. At the onset of ischemia, rate-pressure product was lower in the cold (19.8 +/- 1.0 versus 22.0 +/- 1.6 x 10(-3), p less than 0.05). Both propranolol and diltiazem prolonged time to onset of 1 mm ST depression at both temperatures. The magnitude of improvement at -8 degrees C was equal to that at 20 degrees C, and differences between the two drugs were not statistically significant. Only diltiazem prolonged total exercise duration. Thus, as assessed by exercise testing, cold does not worsen ischemic threshold in most stable angina patients. However, in a subgroup identifiable by history, ischemic threshold is lower in the cold. Propranolol and diltiazem are as effective for exercise-induced ischemia in a cold environment as at normal temperatures.

Sustained-release diltiazem, 120 and 180 mg twice daily, was assessed in a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in 65 stable angina patients with exercise-induced ST depression. Exercise testing was performed 12 ± 1 hours after the last dose at the end of each of the 3 treatment weeks. Both dose levels of drug reduced spontaneous angina (p < 0.001) and increased exercise duration (p < 0.01) and time to 1-mm ST depression (p < 0.001). No differences were noted between the 2 dose levels. Rate-pressure product at maximal exercise was similar for the 3 groups. Only 1 patient terminated the study because of adverse drug effects; severe adverse effects occurred in 1 placebo and 1 low-dose period. Sustained-release diltiazem is safe and efficacious monotherapy for patients with stable angina.

A double-blind crossover trial comparing diltiazem (360 mg/day) and nifedipine (120 mg/day) for treatment of stable angina was conducted in 21 of 27 patients with proven coronary artery disease who completed the trial. All patients started with a 2 week placebo period followed by a random assignment to either drug treatment for 3 weeks and subsequent crossover to the other treatment. The two drug treatment periods were separated by a 1 week placebo washout phase and the study was completed with a 1 week placebo phase. There were no significant differences between patients' responses to diltiazem and nifedipine in relation to time to onset of angina, ST depression responses to exercise, heart rate or systolic or diastolic blood pressure. A total of 37 adverse effects were reported with nifedipine compared with 9 with diltiazem in the 22 patients in whom drug safety was analyzed. Additionally, two patients treated with nifedipine were withdrawn from study participation before crossover. There was a significant (p less than 0.05) difference with respect to incidence of edema (7 of 22 patients taking nifedipine, 1 of 22 taking diltiazem) and dizziness (7 of 22 patients taking nifedipine, 0 of 22 taking diltiazem). The most frequent adverse effect reported with diltiazem was rash (3 of 22 patients). Severe adverse effects were reported in four patients: in one with diltiazem (rash) and in three with nifedipine (palpitation in two and headache in one). A reduction in prescribed dosage was required in 37% of nifedipine-treated compared with 6% of diltiazem-treated patients. Efficacy measures were significantly improved above placebo levels by both diltiazem and nifedipine.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Journal Article Chromatin Elimination Induced by the B Chromosome of Maize: I. Mechanism of loss and the pattern of endosperm variegation Get access M. M. RHOADES, M. M. RHOADES Department of Plant Sciences, Indiana UniversityBloomington, Indiana 47401 Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic PubMed Google Scholar ELLEN DEMPSEY ELLEN DEMPSEY Department of Plant Sciences, Indiana UniversityBloomington, Indiana 47401 Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic PubMed Google Scholar Journal of Heredity, Volume 64, Issue 1, January 1973, Pages 13–18, https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a108327 Published: 01 January 1973