BACKGROUND:We conducted a randomized, controlled trial of circumferential pulmonary-vein ablation for the treatment of chronic atrial fibrillation.METHODS:A total of 146 patients with a mean (+/-SD) age of 57+/-9 years who had chronic atrial fibrillation were randomly assigned to receive amiodarone and undergo two cardioversions during the first three months alone (the control group) or in combination with circumferential pulmonary-vein ablation. Cardiac rhythm was assessed with daily telephonic transmissions for one year. The left atrial diameter and the severity of symptoms were assessed at 12 months.RESULTS:Among the 77 patients assigned to undergo circumferential pulmonary-vein ablation, ablation was repeated because of recurrent atrial fibrillation in 26 percent of patients and atypical atrial flutter in 6 percent. An intention-to-treat analysis showed that 74 percent of patients in the ablation group and 58 percent of those in the control group were free of recurrent atrial fibrillation or flutter without antiarrhythmic-drug therapy at one year (P=0.05). Among the 69 patients in the control group, 53 (77 percent) crossed over to undergo circumferential pulmonary-vein ablation for recurrent atrial fibrillation by one year and only 3 (4 percent) were in sinus rhythm without antiarrhythmic-drug therapy or ablation. There were significant decreases in the left atrial diameter (12+/-11 percent, P<0.001) and the symptom severity score (59+/-21 percent, P<0.001) among patients who remained in sinus rhythm after circumferential pulmonary-vein ablation. Except for atypical atrial flutter, there were no complications attributable to circumferential pulmonary-vein ablation.CONCLUSIONS:Sinus rhythm can be maintained long term in the majority of patients with chronic atrial fibrillation by means of circumferential pulmonary-vein ablation independently of the effects of antiarrhythmic-drug therapy, cardioversion, or both. The maintenance of sinus rhythm is associated with a significant decrease in both the severity of symptoms and the left atrial diameter.

Background— Patients who have previously undergone ablation of atrial fibrillation may experience cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI)-dependent atrial flutter during follow-up. The effects of left atrial (LA) ablation on the characteristics of CTI-dependent flutter have not been described. Methods and Results— Fifteen patients underwent ablation of CTI-dependent flutter late after LA ablation of AF. The ECG, biatrial activation patterns, and LA voltage maps during flutter were analyzed. Thirty age- and gender-matched patients who underwent ablation of CTI-dependent flutter without prior LA ablation served as control subjects. Among the patients with prior LA ablation, mapping revealed counterclockwise activation around the tricuspid annulus in 12 of 15 patients (80%) and clockwise activation in 3 of 15 patients (20%). The flutter waves in the inferior leads were upright in 9 of the 15 patients (60%) with prior LA ablation and in none of the control subjects ( P <0.001). The upright flutter waves in the inferior leads in patients with counterclockwise flutter corresponded to craniocaudal activation of the right atrial free wall. LA activation contributed little to the genesis of the flutter waves in these patients because of a significant reduction in bipolar LA voltage (0.44±0.20 versus 1.54±0.19 mV in patients with biphasic/negative flutter waves; P <0.001). Conclusions— CTI-dependent flutter that occurs after LA ablation of atrial fibrillation often has atypical ECG characteristics because of altered LA activation. In patients presenting with atrial flutter after LA ablation, entrainment mapping should be performed at the CTI even if the ECG is uncharacteristic of CTI-dependent flutter.

OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to identify ventricular tachycardia (VT) isthmus sites by pace-mapping within scar tissue and to identify electrogram characteristics that are helpful in identifying VT isthmus sites during sinus rhythm (SR).BACKGROUND Pace-mapping has been used in the scar border zone to identify the exit site of post-infarction VT.METHODS In 19 consecutive patients (18 men, mean age 66 9 years, mean ejection fraction 0.24 +/- 0.12) with post-infarction VT, a left ventricular voltage map was generated during SR. Pace-mapping was performed at sites with abnormal electrograms or isolated potentials. Radiofrequency ablation was performed at isthmus sites as defined by pace-mapping (perfect pace-map = 12/12 matching electrocardiogram leads; good pace-map = 10/12 to 11/12 matching electrocardiogram leads) and/or entrainment mapping.RESULTS A total of 81 VTs (mean cycle length 396 +/- 124 ms) were inducible. In 16 of the 19 patients, a total of 41 distinct isthmus areas of 41 distinct VTs were identified and successfully ablated. All but one displayed isolated potentials during SR. Furthermore, 22 of the 81 VTs (27%) for which no isthmus was identified became noninducible after ablation of a targeted VT. The 16 patients in whom >= 1 isthmus was identified and ablated were free of arrhythmic events during a mean follow-up of 10 months.CONCLUSIONS During SR, excellent or good pace-maps at sites of isolated potentials within areas of scar identify areas of fixed block that are protected and part of the critical isthmus of post-infarction VT. Shared common pathways might explain why non-targeted VTs might become noninducible after ablation of other VTs. (J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:2013-9) (c) 2006 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

BACKGROUND:Mapping criteria for hemodynamically tolerated, postinfarction ventricular tachycardia (VT) have been evaluated in only small series of patients. OBJECTIVES:The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of various mapping criteria for identifying a critical VT circuit isthmus in a post hoc analysis. METHODS:Ninety VTs (cycle length 491 +/- 84 ms) were mapped in 48 patients with a prior myocardial infarction. The mapping catheter was positioned within a protected area of the reentrant circuit of the targeted VTs at 176 sites. All sites showed concealed entrainment. The predictive values of the following mapping criteria for a successful ablation site were compared: discrete isolated potential during VT, inability to dissociate the isolated potential from the VT, endocardial activation time >70 ms, matching electrogram-QRS and stimulus-QRS intervals, VT termination without global capture during pacing, stimulus-QRS/VT cycle length ratio <or=0.7, and postpacing interval. For each criterion, the receiver operating characteristic curve was constructed, and the area under the curve was calculated to assess the discriminatory value of the criterion. RESULTS:Seventy-eight of 90 VTs (87%) were successfully ablated. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was largest (0.89) for matching stimulus-QRS and electrogram-QRS intervals. In combination with an isolated potential that could not be dissociated from the VT, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve increased to 0.93. CONCLUSION:At sites with concealed entrainment, matching stimulus-QRS and electrogram-QRS intervals were superior to other criteria in differentiating a critical isthmus from bystander or noncritical sites in postinfarction VT.

Background— Because the genesis of atrial fibrillation (AF) is multifactorial and variable, an ablation strategy that involves pulmonary vein isolation and/or a particular set of ablation lines may not be equally effective or efficient in all patients with AF. A tailored strategy that targets initiators and drivers of AF is a possible alternative to a standardized lesion set. Methods and Results— Catheter ablation was performed in 153 consecutive patients (mean age, 56±11 years) with symptomatic paroxysmal AF with the use of an 8-mm tip radiofrequency ablation catheter. The esophagus was visualized with barium. The pulmonary veins and left atrium were mapped during spontaneous or induced AF. Arrhythmogenic pulmonary veins were isolated or encircled. If AF was still present or inducible, complex electrograms in the left atrium, coronary sinus, and superior vena cava were targeted for ablation. The end point of ablation was absence of frequent atrial ectopy and spontaneous AF during isoproterenol infusion and noninducibility of AF. Routine energy applications near the esophagus were avoided. During follow-up, left atrial flutter developed in 19% of patients and was still present in 10% at >12 weeks of follow-up. A repeat ablation procedure was performed in 18% of patients. During a mean follow-up of 11±4 months, 77% of patients were free from AF and/or atrial flutter without antiarrhythmic drug therapy. Pericardial tamponade or transient neurological events occurred in 2% of procedures. Conclusions— A tailored ablation strategy that only targets triggers and drivers of AF is feasible and eliminates paroxysmal AF in ≈80% of patients.

OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to describe the extent of esophageal mobility that occurs during catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation under conscious sedation.BACKGROUND Ablation along the posterior left atrium may cause an atrioesophageal fistula. One strategy for avoiding this risk is to not deliver radiofrequency energy at sites in contact with the esophagus.METHODS In 51 consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation who underwent left atrial ablation, under conscious sedation, digital cine-fluoroscopic imaging of the esophagus was performed in two views after ingestion of barium paste at the beginning and end of the ablation procedure. Movement of the esophagus was determined at the superior, mid-, and inferior parts of the posterior left atrium in reference to the spine.RESULTS Mean esophageal movement was 2.0 +/- 0.8 cm (range = 0.3 to 3.8 cm) at the superior, 1.7 +/- 0.8 cm (range = 0.1 to 3.5 cm) at the mid-, and 2.1 +/- 1.2 cm (range = 0.1 to 4.5 cm) at the inferior levels. In 67% of the 51 patients, the esophagus shifted by 2 cm, and in 4% there was :4 cm of lateral movement. The mean change in esophageal luminal width was 5 +/- 7 mm (range = 0 to 36 mm) at the superior, 5 +/- 7 min (range = 0 to 32 mm) at the mid-, and 6 +/- 7 mm (range = 0 to 21 mm) at the inferior levels of the posterior left atrium.CONCLUSIONS The esophagus often is mobile and shifts sideways by >= 2 cm in a majority of patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation under conscious sedation. Therefore, real-time imaging of the esophagus may be helpful in reducing the risk of esophageal injury during radiofrequency ablation along the posterior left atrium.

BACKGROUND:Left atrial (LA) circumferential ablation has been reported to eliminate atrial fibrillation (AF). Whether an ablation without encirclement of the pulmonary veins (PVs) is as effective as LA circumferential ablation is not clear.OBJECTIVES:The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of LA circumferential ablation and nonencircling linear ablation in patients with chronic AF.METHODS:Eighty patients with chronic AF were randomized to undergo LA circumferential ablation (n = 40) or nonencircling linear ablation (n = 40). In LA circumferential ablation, the PVs were encircled, with additional lines made in the mitral isthmus and posterior wall or roof. In nonencircling linear ablation, 4 +/- 1 ablation lines were created through areas of complex electrograms, with lines in the roof (38), anterior wall (36), septum (40), mitral isthmus (32), and posterior annulus (6). The endpoint of LA circumferential ablation and nonencircling linear ablation was voltage abatement.RESULTS:LA flutter occurred in 15% after LA circumferential ablation and in 18% after nonencircling linear ablation (P = .8). A repeat ablation procedure was performed for recurrent AF in 7 and 11 patients or for atrial flutter in 6 and 4 patients after LA circumferential ablation and nonencircling linear ablation, respectively (P = .8). At 9 +/- 4 months, the prevalence of AF was 28% in the LA circumferential ablation and 25% in the nonencircling linear ablation group (P = .8). Sixty-eight percent and 60% of patients were in sinus rhythm and free of AF and atrial flutter in the absence of antiarrhythmic drug therapy after LA circumferential ablation and nonencircling linear ablation, respectively (P = .5). There were no complications.CONCLUSION:Nonencircling linear ablation and LA circumferential ablation are equally efficacious in eliminating chronic AF. However, the advantage of nonencircling linear ablation is that it eliminates the need for ablation along the posterior wall of the LA. Therefore, nonencircling linear ablation may avoid the small but real risk of atrioesophageal fistula formation associated with LA circumferential ablation.

OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence and clinical significance of macroreentrant atrial tachycardia (AT) after left atrial (LA) circumferential ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF).BACKGROUND Linear ablation for AF may result in macroreentrant AT.METHODS Three hundred forty-nine patients (age 54 +/- 11 years) underwent LA circumferential ablation for AF (paroxysmal in 227). Ablation lines were created around the left-sided and right-sided pulmonary veins, with additional ablation lines in the posterior LA and mitral isthmus. If macroreentrant AT was observed acutely in the electrophysiology laboratory, it was not ablated. If an organized AT occurred during follow-up, the initial strategy was rate control. If AT persisted for > 3 to 4 months, catheter ablation was performed.RESULTS Seventy-one patients (20%) had spontaneous or induced macroreentrant AT (cycle length 244 +/- 31 ms) in the electrophysiology laboratory following LA circumferential ablation. During follow-up, 85 patients (24%) experienced spontaneous AT (cycle length 238 +/- 35 ins) at a mean of 44 +/- 62 days following LA circumferential ablation. Among the 71 patients with macroreentrant AT acutely following LA circumferential ablation, 39 (55%) developed AT during follow-up. Among the 85 patients with AT during follow-up, the tachycardia remitted without a repeat ablation procedure in 28 patients (33%), most commonly within 5 months. Twenty-eight of the 349 patients (8%) underwent a repeat ablation procedure for AT. The critical isthmus was localized to the mitral isthmus in 17 of 28 patients (61%).CONCLUSIONS Macroreentrant AT is a common form of proarrhythmia after LA circumferential ablation for AF. Because it may resolve spontaneously, ablation of AT should be deferred for several months.

BACKGROUND:Mechanical trauma has been described as a helpful guide for ablation of atrial tachycardias and accessory pathways. In postinfarction ventricular tachycardia (VT), the reentrant circuit is partly endocardial and therefore may be susceptible to catheter trauma.OBJECTIVES:The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence and significance of VT termination resulting from catheter trauma.METHODS:A consecutive series of 39 patients (mean age 68 +/- 7 years, ejection fraction 0.25 +/- 0.02) underwent left ventricular mapping for postinfarction VT. Mapping was performed during 62 hemodynamically tolerated VTs (mean cycle length 451 +/- 88 ms). Only hemodynamically tolerated VTs that did not terminate spontaneously and VTs that were reproducibly inducible were included in the study. VT termination was considered mechanical only if it was not caused by a premature depolarization.RESULTS:In 13 of 62 VTs (21%) in 8 of 39 patients (21%), either VT terminated during catheter placement at a particular site (n = 7) or a previously reproducibly inducible VT became no longer inducible with the mapping catheter located at a particular site (n = 6). The stimulus-QRS interval was significantly shorter at sites where mechanical trauma affected the reentrant circuit compared with sites having concealed entrainment (102 +/- 56 ms vs 253 +/- 134 ms, P = .003). At the site that was susceptible to mechanical trauma, the pace map was identical or highly similar in 13 of 13 VTs. After radiofrequency ablation at these sites, the targeted VTs were no longer inducible. No patient had recurrence of the targeted VT during a mean follow-up of 15 +/- 11 months.CONCLUSIONS:Catheter contact at a critical endocardial site can interrupt postinfarction VT or prevent its induction. Radiofrequency ablation at sites of mechanical termination of VT has a high probability of success.

Background: To eliminate the risk of atrio-esophageal fistula, it may be important to identify the exact location of the esophagus along the posterior left atrial wall, and avoid applications of radiofrequency energy in the immediate vicinity. Although it has been recognized that the esophagus may move in the mediastinum, the incidence and range of esophageal migration (EM) that occurs during ablation have not been described. The purpose of this study was to describe the incidence and characteristics of EM during left atrial catheter ablation (LACA) for atrial fibrillation (AF).

BACKGROUND The coronary sinus (CS) and its branches may play a role in the genesis of various arrhythmias. Applications of radiofrequency energy within the CS may be necessary. Atrio-esophageal fistula has been recognized as a complication of ablation along the posterior left atrial wall.OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to describe the in vivo topographic anatomy of the CS, esophagus, and coronary arteries using computed tomography (CT).METHODS Helical contrast CT of the heart with three-dimensional and endoscopic reconstructions was performed in 50 patients (28 men and 22 women mean age 54 +/- 10 years), The images were reformatted to determine the relationships among the CS. adjacent blood vessels, and esophagus and to determine the nature and thickness of surrounding tissue layers.RESULTS Mean CS ostium diameter was 12 4 mm. and mean thickness of the periosteal fat layer wits 3 2 mm. In 40 of the 50 patients (80%). the esophagus was adjacent to the CS, starting 24 +/- from the ostium, and remained in contact for a mean length of 7 +/- 5 mm. Mean thickness of the fat layer between the esophagus and CS was 1 +/- 1 mm, and mean thickness of the anterior wall of the esophagus was 3 +/- 2 mm. In 10 patients (20%). there wits no contact between the esophagus and CS, In 40 patients (80%), the right coronary artery was less than 5 mm front the CS (minimum distance 1 +/-1 mm) over a mean length of 17 +/- 11 mm, In all patients, the circumflex artery wits less than 5 mm from the CS (minimum distance 1 +/- 0.4 mm) over a mean length of 16 +/- 9 mill in patients with right-dominant coronary circulation and over it mean length of 86 +/- 11 mm in patients with left-dominant coronary circulation.CONCLUSION The CS often lies very close to the esophagus and coronary arteries. During radiofrequency energy ablation in the CS, caution should be exercised to prevent injury to surrounding structures.

OBJECTIVES:The goal of this study was to describe the prevalence and ablation of coronary sinus (CS) arrhythmias after left atrial ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). BACKGROUND:The CS has been implicated in a variety of supraventricular arrhythmias. METHODS:Thirty-eight patients underwent mapping and ablation of atypical flutter that developed during (n = 5) or after (n = 33) ablation for AF. Also included were two patients with focal CS arrhythmias that occurred during an AF ablation procedure. A tachycardia was considered to be originating from the CS if the post-pacing interval in the CS matched the tachycardia cycle length and/or if it terminated during ablation in the CS. RESULTS:Among the 33 patients who developed atypical flutter late after AF ablation, 9 (27%) were found to have a CS origin. Overall, 16 of the 40 patients in this study had a CS arrhythmia. The tachycardia was macro-re-entrant in 14 patients (88%) and focal in two patients. Radiofrequency ablation with an 8-mm-tip catheter was successful in 15 patients (94%) without complication. In eight patients (50%), > or = 45 W was required for successful ablation. Thirteen of the 15 patients (87%) with a successful ablation acutely remained arrhythmia-free during 5 +/- 5 months of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS:The musculature of the CS serves as a critical component of the re-entry circuit in approximately 25% of patients with atypical flutter after ablation for AF. The CS may also generate focal atrial arrhythmias that may play a role in triggering and/or maintaining AF. Catheter ablation of these arrhythmias in the CS can be performed safely.

A long-RP narrow-QRS complex tachycardia was induced during infusion of isoproterenol by programmed atrial stimulation (Figure 1). The basic drive cycle length was 370 ms, and the coupling interval of the atrial extrastimulus was 210 ms. The atrial-His (AH) interval during the basic drive train was 60 ms. The tachycardia had a cycle length of 280 ms, and the AH interval during the tachycardia was 20 ms. What is the mechanism of the tachycardia?

Background: Tachycardia detection in first-generation biventricular pacemaker-implantable cardioverter defibrillators (BiV ICD) occurs through both the right ventricular (RV) and left ventricular (LV) leads, creating the potential for inappropriate detection and therapies. Little is known regarding the prevalence and management of patients with BiV ICDs and inappropriate detection.Methods and Results: A transvenous, first-generation BiV ICD was implanted in 77 consecutive patients (age 61 +/- 11 years) for drug-refractory heart failure. The mean New York Heart Association class, QRS duration, and ejection fraction were 3.1 +/- 0.4, 168 +/- 24 iris, and 0.19 +/- 0.07, respectively. Among the 77 patients, 17 (22%) experienced inappropriate detection at a mean of 154 140 clays after implantation. Fifteen of the 17 patients (88%) experienced inappropriate ICD therapy. In 16 of the 17 (94%) patients, the cause of inappropriate detection was double counting during sinus (8) or atrial rhythm (3), and non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (5). Despite reprogramming of the ICD, 9 patients (53%) required an additional procedure because of inappropriate therapies, including an upgrade to a dedicated BiV ICD (5), revision of the LV lead (2), ablation of the atrioventricular junction (1), and repeat defibrillation threshold testing (2).Conclusions: Inappropriate detection in patients with a first-generation BiV ICD is common and often results in inappropriate ICD therapy. The most common mechanism of inappropriate detection is double Counting that often creates the need for additional procedures. Although devices in which tachycardia detection occurs only through the RV lead now are available, close follow-up of the many patients who received a first-generation BiV ICD is necessary.