Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) was initially promoted as an oral therapy for early treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Conventional meta-analyses cannot fully address the heterogeneity of different designs and outcomes of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the efficacy of HCQ in outpatients with mild COVID-19. We conducted a pooled analysis of individual participant data from RCTs that evaluated the effect of HCQ on hospitalization and viral load reduction in outpatients with confirmed COVID-19. We evaluated the overall treatment group effect by log-likelihood ratio test (-2LL) from a generalized linear mixed model to accommodate correlated longitudinal binary data. The analysis included data from 11 RCTs. The outcome of virological effect, assessed in 1560 participants (N = 795 HCQ, N = 765 control), did not differ significantly between the two treatment groups (-2LL = 7.66; p = 0.18) when adjusting for cohort, duration of symptoms, and comorbidities. The decline in polymerase chain reaction positive tests from day 1 to 7 was 42.0 and 41.6 percentage points in the HCQ and control groups, respectively. Among the 2037 participants evaluable for hospitalization (N = 1058 HCQ, N = 979 control), we found no significant differences in hospitalization rate between participants receiving HCQ and controls (odds ratio 0.995; 95% confidence interval 0.614-1.610; -2LL = 0.0; p = 0.98) when adjusting for cohort, duration of symptoms, and comorbidities. This individual participant data meta-analysis of 11 HCQ trials that evaluated severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 viral clearance and COVID-19 hospitalization did not show a clinical benefit of HCQ. Our meta-analysis provides evidence to support the interruption in the use of HCQ in mild COVID-19 outpatients to reduce progression to severe disease.

Abstract Background SARS-CoV-2 continues to spread and the development of safe and effective therapeutics for the prevention of severe disease remains a priority. BRII-196 and BRII-198 are non-competing anti-SARS-CoV-2 mAbs with YTE triple amino acid substitution in Fc to extend half-life and reduce receptor binding, that are being studied for treatment of COVID-19 in the ACTIV-2 Trial, sponsored by NIAID and led by ACTG. Methods ACTIV-2 evaluates safety/efficacy of investigational agents for treatment of non-hospitalized adults with mild-moderate COVID-19 under a randomized, blinded, controlled adaptive platform. BRII-196/BRII-198 (1000 mg each) as a single dose given as sequential infusions, or placebo to those at high risk of clinical progression (i.e., age ≥ 60 years or presence of other medical conditions) within 10 days of symptom onset and positive test for SARS-CoV-2. The primary endpoint was hospitalization and/or death through day 28. We report Phase 3 BRII-196/BRII-198 trial results per DSMB recommendation following an interim analysis. Results Between January and July 2021, 837 participants (418 active, 419 placebo) from sites in the US (66%), Brazil, South Africa, Mexico, Argentina and the Philippines were randomized and received study product at time of emerging variants. Median age 49 years (Q1, Q3: 39, 58), 51% female, 17% Black/African-American and 49% Hispanic/Latino, with median 6 days from symptom onset. At interim analysis 71% and 97% had a day 28 and 7 visit, respectively. For all available data at interim review, BRII-196/BRII-198 compared to placebo had fewer hospitalizations (12 vs. 45) and deaths (1 vs. 9). At day 28 of follow-up, there was an estimated 78% reduction in hospitalization and/or death (2.4 vs. 11.1%), relative risk 0.22 (95% CI: 0.05, 0.86), P=0.00001 (nominal one-sided). Grade 3 or higher adverse events (AEs) were observed less frequently among BRII-196/BRII-198 participants than placebo (3.8% vs. 13.4%) with no severe infusion reactions or drug related serious AEs. Conclusion BRII-196/BRII-198 was safe, well-tolerated, and demonstrated significant reduction compared to placebo in the risk of hospitalization and/or death among adults with mild-moderate COVID-19 at high risk for progression to severe disease. Disclosures Kara W. Chew, MD, MS, Amgen (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Grant/Research Support; Merck Sharp & Dohme (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Grant/Research Support David Alain Wohl, MD, Gilead Sciences (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Advisor or Review Panel member, Consultant, Research Grant or Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator; Janssen (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Advisor or Review Panel member; Merck (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Advisor or Review Panel member, Research Grant or Support; ViiV (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Advisor or Review Panel member, Research Grant or Support Joseph J. Eron, MD, Gilead Sciences (Consultant, Research Grant or Support)Janssen (Consultant, Research Grant or Support)Merck (Consultant)ViiV (Consultant, Research Grant or Support) David A. Margolis, MD MPH, Brii Biosciences (Employee) Courtney Fletcher, Pharm.D., National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, NIH (Grant/Research Support) Davey Smith, M.D., Linear Therapies, Matrix Biomed, Bayer (Consultant, Shareholder) Eric Daar, Gilead (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)Merck (Consultant)ViiV (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)

Abstract Background Metabolic comorbidities including diabetes (DM) and dyslipidemia pose challenges to the long-term care of people with HIV (PWH). Incidence of cardiovascular disease and DM are reported at higher rates in PWH than the general population. Obesity is broadly prevalent in both the general population and PWH, and higher body mass index (BMI) can contribute to metabolic complications. Here we present longer-term follow up on incidence of DM, hypertension (HTN), BMI categorical shifts, and lipid changes over 144 weeks of blinded treatment from two trials of PWH initiating antiretroviral therapy. Methods We assessed incidence of metabolic complications in adult PWH in Study 1489: bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF) vs dolutegravir/abacavir/ lamivudine (DTG/ABC/3TC) and Study 1490: B/F/TAF vs DTG+F/TAF. Treatment-emergent (TE) metabolic comorbidities were defined by standard MedDRA search lists. CDC-defined BMI categories were compared from baseline (BL) to Week 144. Analyses by sex at birth and race were performed, as well as for lipid changes. Results Among 1,274 total participants, median (range) age was 33 years (18-77), 90% men, 33% black. In study 1489, BL prevalence of DM and HTN was 4.5 and 12.1% with TE DM and HTN in B/F/TAF being 0.7% and 10%, and for DTG/ABC/3TC 1.3% and 6.9%, respectively. In study 1490, BL prevalence of DM and HTN was 6.8 and 18.8% with TE DM and HTN in B/F/TAF being 2.1 and 5.8%, and for DTG+F/TAF 2.3 and 6.5%, respectively. BMI shift from Normal to Obese: B/F/TAF 0%, DTG/ABC/3TC 3.2%, p=0.12 (1489) (Table 1); B/F/TAF 2.5%, DTG+F/TAF 2.9% p=1.00 (1490) (Table 2). Subgroup analyses by gender/race showed similar findings for TE DM, HTN, and BMI changes. Median changes from BL fasted lipids were small (Table 1). Table 1§. Studies 1489 and 1490: Metabolic Outcomes from Baseline to Week 144 Table 2±. Shift Table of BMI Category at Week 144 by Baseline BMI Category – Overall Conclusion Through over 144 weeks of follow up, PWH randomized to initiate B/F/TAF, DTG/ABC/3TC or DTG+F/TAF had low rates of incident DM or HTN-related AEs, with no statistically significant differences by treatment group. BMI changes/categorical shifts from BL did not significantly differ by regimen, and no clinically significant change or difference by regimen in lipids were observed. While data are limited by three years of follow up, they are strengthened by randomized study design of three widely used initial ART regimens. Disclosures Eric Daar, MD, Bristol-Myers Squibb (Consultant)Gilead Sciences Inc. (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Advisor or Review Panel member, Research Grant or Support)Janssen (Consultant, Advisor or Review Panel member, Research Grant or Support)Merck (Consultant, Advisor or Review Panel member, Research Grant or Support)Teva (Consultant, Advisor or Review Panel member)ViiV Healthcare (Consultant, Advisor or Review Panel member, Research Grant or Support) Chloe Orkin, MD, Gilead Sciences Inc. (Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Other Financial or Material Support)Janssen (Research Grant or Support, Other Financial or Material Support)Merck (Research Grant or Support, Other Financial or Material Support)ViiV Healthcare (Research Grant or Support, Other Financial or Material Support) Paul Sax, MD, Gilead Sciences (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)Janssen (Consultant)Merck (Consultant, Research Grant or Support)ViiV (Consultant, Research Grant or Support) Jeffrey L. Stephens, MD, Gilead Sciences Inc. (Scientific Research Study Investigator, Research Grant or Support) Ellen Koenig, MD, Gilead Sciences Inc. (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Amanda Clarke, MD, Gilead Sciences Inc. (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Other Financial or Material Support, Conference attendance sponsorship)ViiV Healthcare (Consultant, Other Financial or Material Support, Conference travel sponsorship) Axel Baumgarten, MD, AbbVie (Advisor or Review Panel member, Speaker’s Bureau)Bristol-Myers Squibb (Advisor or Review Panel member, Speaker's Bureau)Gilead Sciences Inc. (Scientific Research Study Investigator, Advisor or Review Panel member, Speaker's Bureau)Janssen (Speaker’s Bureau)Merck (Advisor or Review Panel member) Cynthia Brinson, MD, Abbvie (Scientific Research Study Investigator)BI (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Gilead Sciences Inc. (Scientific Research Study Investigator, Advisor or Review Panel member, Speaker's Bureau, Personal fees)GSK (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Novo Nordisk (Scientific Research Study Investigator)ViiV Healthcare (Scientific Research Study Investigator, Advisor or Review Panel member, Speaker's Bureau) Moti Ramgopal, MD FIDSA, Abbvie (Scientific Research Study Investigator, Speaker's Bureau)Gilead (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Speaker's Bureau)Janssen (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Research Grant or Support, Speaker's Bureau)Merck (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator)ViiV (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Speaker's Bureau) Hailin Huang, PhD, Gilead Sciences Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Terry Farrow, MD, Gilead Sciences Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Jared Baeten, MD, PHD, Gilead Sciences Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Jason Hindman, PharmD, Gilead Sciences Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Hal Martin, MD, MPH, Gilead Sciences Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Kimberly Workowski, MD, Nothing to disclose

BACKGROUND Safe and effective long-acting injectable agents for preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection are needed to increase the options for preventing HIV infection. METHODS We conducted a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, noninferiority trial to compare long-acting injectable cabotegravir (CAB-LA, an integrase strand-transfer inhibitor [INSTI]) at a dose of 600 mg, given intramuscularly every 8 weeks, with daily oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-emtricitabine (TDF-FTC) for the prevention of HIV infection in at-risk cisgender men who have sex with men (MSM) and in at-risk transgender women who have sex with men. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive one of the two regimens and were followed for 153 weeks. HIV testing and safety evaluations were performed. The primary end point was incident HIV infection. RESULTS The intention-to-treat population included 4566 participants who underwent randomization; 570 (12.5%) identified as transgender women, and the median age was 26 years (interquartile range, 22 to 32). The trial was stopped early for efficacy on review of the results of the first preplanned interim end-point analysis. Among 1698 participants from the United States, 845 (49.8%) identified as Black. Incident HIV infection occurred in 52 participants: 13 in the cabotegravir group (incidence, 0.41 per 100 person-years) and 39 in the TDF-FTC group (incidence, 1.22 per 100 person-years) (hazard ratio, 0.34; 95% confidence interval, 0.18 to 0.62). The effect was consistent across prespecified subgroups. Injection-site reactions were reported in 81.4% of the participants in the cabotegravir group and in 31.3% of those in the TDF-FTC group. In the participants in whom HIV infection was diagnosed after exposure to CAB-LA, INSTI resistance and delays in the detection of HIV infection were noted. No safety concerns were identified. CONCLUSIONS CAB-LA was superior to daily oral TDF-FTC in preventing HIV infection among MSM and transgender women. Strategies are needed to prevent INSTI resistance in cases of CAB-LA PrEP failure. (Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and others; HPTN 083 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02720094.).

Abstract Background In DISCOVER, emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (F/TAF) was noninferior to F/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) for preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in men who have sex with men and transgender women, with a superior renal laboratory profile. The differential impact of F/TAF and F/TDF on renal parameters among older individuals and those with medical comorbidities is unknown. Methods DISCOVER randomized participants 1:1 to daily blinded F/TAF or F/TDF. We examined renal outcomes at week 48 including estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) by Cockcroft-Gault, β2 microglobulin (M):Creatinine (Cr) and retinol binding protein (RBP):Cr ratios (markers of proximal renal tubular function), and discontinuations due to investigator reported study drug-related renal adverse events (AEs). Results Median age was 34 years (yrs)(range 18-76), with 12.5% vs 10.9% < 25yrs, 12.2% vs 14.4% ≥ 50yrs, and 1.1% vs 0.9% > 65yrs for F/TAF and F/TDF, respectively. The prevalence of medical comorbidities at baseline were; eGFR < 90mL/min= 9.1% vs 9.3%, diabetes= 2.9% vs 3.3%, and hypertension= 10.5 vs 11.1%, for F/TAF and F/TDF, respectively. eGFR changes by age category and medical comorbidity status are found in the Table. Forty participants had study drug-related renal AEs; 14 with F/TAF and 26 with F/TDF. Of these, 25% were > 50yrs, 20% had baseline eGFR < 90mL/min, 7.5% had history of diabetes, and 22.5% had history of hypertension. β2M:Cr and RBP:Cr changes were more favorable in participants receiving F/TAF, with greater magnitude of difference in older participants (data not shown). Table. Conclusion The DISCOVER trial allows for a large single variable comparison of the two tenofovir prodrugs in the absence of underlying HIV infection and in the absence of third antiretroviral agents. F/TAF was associated with favorable changes in renal biomarkers regardless of age or medical comorbidity. Participants ≥50yrs or with comorbidities were proportionately more likely to develop study drug related renal AEs, but these were present in the minority of cases. Disclosures Eric Daar, MD, BMS (Consultant)Gilead Sciences Inc. (Consultant, Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator)Janssen (Consultant)Merck (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)Teva (Consultant)Theratechnology (Consultant)Viiv Healthcare (Consultant, Grant/Research Support) Jason Brunetta, MD, AbbVie (Consultant)Gilead Sciences Inc. (Consultant, Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Speaker’s Bureau, Other Financial or Material Support, Conference attendance sponsorship)Janssen (Other Financial or Material Support, Conference attendance sponsorship)Merck (Consultant, Speaker’s Bureau, Other Financial or Material Support, Conference attendance sponsorship)Viiv Healthcare (Consultant, Speaker’s Bureau, Other Financial or Material Support, Conference attendance sponsorship) Eric Cua, MD, Gilead Sciences Inc. (Scientific Research Study Investigator) David Asmuth, MD, Gilead Sciences Inc. (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Christoph C. Carter, MD, Gilead Sciences Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Yongwu Shao, PhD, Gilead Sciences Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Pamela Wong, MPH, Gilead Sciences Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Ramin Ebrahimi, MSc, Gilead Sciences Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Moupali Das, MD, Gilead Sciences Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Diana M. Brainard, MD, Gilead Sciences (Employee) Amanda Clarke, MD, Gilead Sciences Inc. (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Other Financial or Material Support, Conference attendance sponsorship)Viiv Healthcare (Consultant, Other Financial or Material Support, Conference travel sponsorship)

BACKGROUNDPeople with human immunodeficiency virus (PWH) face increased risks for heart failure and adverse heart failure outcomes. Myocardial steatosis predisposes to diastolic dysfunction, a heart failure precursor. We aimed to characterize myocardial steatosis and associated potential risk factors among a subset of the Randomized Trial to Prevent Vascular Events in HIV (REPRIEVE) participants.METHODSEighty-two PWH without known heart failure successfully underwent cardiovascular magnetic resonance spectroscopy, yielding data on intramyocardial triglyceride (IMTG) content (a continuous marker for myocardial steatosis extent). Logistic regression models were applied to investigate associations between select clinical characteristics and odds of increased or markedly increased IMTG content.RESULTSMedian (Q1, Q3) IMTG content was 0.59% (0.28%, 1.15%). IMTG content was increased (> 0.5%) among 52% and markedly increased (> 1.5%) among 22% of participants. Parameters associated with increased IMTG content included age (P = .013), body mass index (BMI) ≥ 25 kg/m2 (P = .055), history of intravenous drug use (IVDU) (P = .033), and nadir CD4 count < 350 cells/mm³ (P = .055). Age and BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 were additionally associated with increased odds of markedly increased IMTG content (P = .049 and P = .046, respectively).CONCLUSIONSA substantial proportion of antiretroviral therapy-treated PWH exhibited myocardial steatosis. Age, BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2, low nadir CD4 count, and history of IVDU emerged as possible risk factors for myocardial steatosis in this group.CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATIONNCT02344290; NCT03238755.

Regional variability in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) care engagement remains underexplored.Multiple logistic models compared HIV outcomes for participants from 5 Southern (n = 557) and 6 non-Southern (n = 670) sites.Southern participants were less likely to experience viral suppression (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], .37-.72) and had a higher likelihood of a CD4 + count <200 cells/µL (aOR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.17-2.00).HIV intervention and social safety net programs should be expanded.Clinical Trials Registration.NCT01612169.

We investigated the use of a system with an ingestible sensor (Proteus Digital Health Feedback system) co-encapsulated with antiretrovirals (ARVs) to measure real-time adherence. To assess the safety and impact, if any, co-encapsulation might have on ARV concentrations, we evaluated the pharmacokinetics of ARVs co-encapsulated with an ingestible sensor for eight commonly used fixed-dose combination ARVs: emtricitabine (FTC)/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF); FTC/tenofovir alafenamide (TAF); efavirenz (EFV)/FTC/TDF; abacavir (ABC)/lamivudine (3TC); dolutegravir (DTG)/ABC/3TC; rilpivirine (RPV)/TAF/FTC; elvitegravir (EVG)/cobicistat (COBI)/FTC/TAF; and bictegravir (BIC)/FTC/TAF. The steady-state apparent peak plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the curve (AUC) were determined from plasma concentrations measured at pre-dose, 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post dose, and compared with literature values. A total of 49 unique patients on stable regimens for at least 12 weeks with undetectable viral loads were recruited. Cmax and AUC values were not statistically significant different from literature values for all of the formulations except the Cmax of FTC/TDF, Cmax of BIC, and the Cmax of RPV. In a subsequent evaluation of FTC/TDF and BIC/FTC/TAF using a crossover design, the geometric mean ratio (GMR) between the co-encapsulated and the un-encapsulated formulations for FTC/TDF were: FTC, 84.6% (90% CI 66.6%-107.4%) for AUC and 77.5% (60.1%-99.9%) for Cmax. For tenofovir (TFV) the GMR was 96.2% (90% CI 89.2%-103.8%) for AUC and 87.3% (64.2%-118.7%) for Cmax. The GMR for BIC (from the BIC/FTC/TAF formulation) was 98.0% (90% CI 84.5%-113.5%) for AUC and 89.9% (84.5%-95.7%) for Cmax. The observed deviation in FTC/TDF (Truvada) may be due to participant characteristics, fasted/fed conditions, and/or random variation and may warrant further investigations with a larger sample size. These findings provide assurance for use of co-encapsulated ARVs for future HIV treatment-adherence research.

Abstract Background In U.S. internal medicine residency program studies, residents indicated low self-assessed HIV training adequacy, patient care experience, and clinical skills competence. Little is known for infectious disease (ID) fellows, but review findings indicate that increased healthcare provider (HCP) experience and training are associated with better patient outcomes. As part of a continuing medical education (CME) program on HIV, we conducted a survey study in which ID fellows rated their training adequacy, comfort level, and experience in HIV patient care. Methods On October 1, 2016, an 8 hour workshop was attended by 33 ID fellows from across the US, selected by their program directors. Three HIV experts designed and led the workshop of interactive presentations, case-based discussions, and Q&A. Pre-program surveys included items for trainees to report their experience in providing HIV patient care and to rate their training adequacy and comfort level for clinical skills related to the educational topics. Post-program surveys included items assessing educational outcomes in these domains. In addition to describing the trainees’ self-assessments, the associated relationship between trainees’ experience in providing patient care and comfort level in performing HIV-related clinical skills were analyzed. Results Many ID fellows reported little experience (≤15 patients) from their fellowship training in personally counseling patients for PrEP (91% of fellows) and initiating and monitoring patients on guideline-directed ART (51%). Only 30% and 22% of fellows strongly felt that they had adequate experience from their fellowship training in PrEP and guideline-directed ART, respectively. Following the educational program, 55% of fellows strongly agreed that they now felt comfortable in both of these areas. Few ID fellows reported that their training provided adequate experience in discussing sexual risk behavior and preferences (39%), individualizing ART (22%), and avoiding/managing drug-drug interactions (9%). However, following the program, more ID fellows reported feeling comfortable in these areas – 55%, 45%, and 21%, respectively. Conclusion Gaps persist for ID fellows in training adequacy, comfort level, and experience in HIV patient care. Disclosures C. Hicks, Merck: Consultant and Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee; Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Consultant and Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee; Janssen: Consultant and Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee; ViiV: Consultant and Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee; E. Daar, Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultant, Consulting fee; Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Consultant, Grant Investigator and Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee and Research support; Janssen: Consultant, Grant Investigator and Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee and Research support; Merck: Consultant, Grant Investigator and Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee and Research support; Teva Pharmaceuticals: Consultant and Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee; ViiV: Consultant, Grant Investigator and Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee and Research support; C. Heggen-Peay, PRIME Education, LLC: Independent Contractor and Independent medical education provider, Educational grant; T. Sapir, PRIME Education, LLC: Independent Contractor and Independent medical education provider, Educational grant and This project was funded by independent educational grant from Gilead Sciences, Inc. The study sponsors did not play a role in the design or analysis of the study or in the decision to submit for presentation.; K. Moreo, PRIME Education, LLC: Independent Contractor and Independent medical education provider, Educational grant and This project was funded by independent educational grant from Gilead Sciences, Inc. The study sponsors did not play a role in the design or analysis of the study or in the decision to submit for presentation.