Background: To evaluate the impact of sex on acute SARS-CoV-2 infection, 668 participants from the ACTIV-2/A5401 study were followed over a 28-day period. Methods: A primary analysis was performed on 469 participants with quantifiable viral loads at baseline. Results: Male and female participants had comparable nasal SARS-CoV-2 RNA levels at study entry and throughout follow-up. However, sex-specific differences in viral shedding emerged when stratified by symptom duration. In the first 3 days after symptom onset, female participants exhibited higher nasal SARS-CoV-2 RNA levels than males, but lower viral RNA levels thereafter. The higher viral RNA levels in females during the earliest phase of acute COVID-19 were observed even after adjusting for age, race, and region of enrollment. Female participants also tended to have higher symptom scores across days since symptom onset, but no significant correlation was observed between nasal SARS-CoV-2 RNA levels and symptom score regardless of sex. Conclusion: These findings highlight the impact of sex on both viral shedding and symptom dynamics and underscore the importance of considering time since symptom onset when evaluating antiviral therapies for respiratory viruses in clinical trials.

This article provides a focused update to the clinical practice guideline on the treatment and management of patients with coronavirus disease 2019, developed by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. The guideline panel presents a recommendation on the use of the anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 neutralizing antibody pemivibart as pre-exposure prophylaxis. The recommendation is based on evidence derived from a systematic review and adheres to a standardized methodology for rating the certainty of evidence and strength of recommendation according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach. Information on pemivibart is included in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Emergency Use Authorization for this agent.

This article provides a focused update to the clinical practice guideline on the treatment and management of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), developed by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. The guideline panel presents a recommendation on the use of abatacept in hospitalized adults with severe or critical COVID-19. The recommendation is based on evidence derived from a systematic literature review and adheres to a standardized methodology for rating the certainty of evidence and strength of recommendation according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach.

As the first part of several focused updates to the clinical practice guideline on the treatment and management of COVID-19 in adults, children, and pregnant people, developed by the Infectious Diseases Society of America, the panel presents four new recommendations. These recommendations include pre-exposure prophylaxis for immunocompromised persons and treatment of severe or critical COVID-19. The panel’s recommendations are based upon evidence derived from systematic literature reviews and adhere to a standardized methodology for rating the certainty of evidence and strength of recommendation according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach.

To evaluate long-term changes in weight and metabolic parameters in people with HIV-1 (PWH) initiating first-line antiretroviral therapy. Analysis of two Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trials (1489: NCT02607930; 1490: NCT02607956). PWH received bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF) or dolutegravir (DTG)-based treatment (Study 1489: dolutegravir/abacavir/lamivudine [DTG/ABC/3TC]; Study 1490: DTG + F/TAF) for 144 weeks, followed by B/F/TAF (96-week open-label extension up to Week 240). Weight and metabolic parameters were assessed through Week 144 by randomized treatment assignment. Weight changes by baseline viral load and CD4 count were evaluated in PWH receiving B/F/TAF from baseline through Week 240. Multivariate modeling explored baseline factors associated with absolute weight and weight change through Week 240 and weight gain ≥ 10

Monoclonal antibodies have potential as rapidly developable agents for treatment and prevention of emerging viruses. The ACTIV-2 trial randomized persons with mild-moderate COVID-19 to the monoclonal antibody combination tixagevimab/cilgavimab via intramuscular injection (600 mg IM) or infusion (300 mg IV) versus placebo. We present final safety and laboratory outcomes; primary outcomes were previously reported. The analyzed IM group included 214 participants, and the IV group, 106 participants. Adverse events were not different between treatment and placebo. The half-life of both components was >90 days for IM or 75 days for IV. New anti-drug antibodies were about 3 times more likely in active vs. placebo recipients. SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies increased 157-fold at 7 days and 127-fold at 1 month (IM-treated) but were less robust in IV participants. These data can inform future development of monoclonal antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 and other viruses, even if this intervention is of low utility for contemporary SARS-CoV-2 variants.

We evaluated intramuscular (IM) versus intravenous (IV) administration of tixagevimab/cilgavimab in early COVID-19. Both routes achieved rapid elimination of culturable virus and minimal emergence of resistance. These results support IM delivery as a viable alternative to IV, with important implications for scalable deployment in future viral pandemics.

Seamless phase 2/3 study designs provide a framework for a more efficient trial. During the COVID-19 pandemic, such study designs were considered particularly appealing as there was an urgent global need to rapidly identify effective therapeutics. However, limited in vivo safety and efficacy data was available early in the pandemic to inform decisions. As part of the ACTIV-2 study, we implemented a phase 2/3 platform trial to evaluate multiple candidate treatments for non-hospitalized adults with COVID-19. In addition to an adequate safety profile, the decision to graduate an agent from phase 2 to phase 3 was based on showing treatment effects on clinical or laboratory markers. Decision criteria evolved over time as more data became available during the global pandemic. A seamless transition and approximately 20 % reduction in total sample size was achieved for one agent, amubarvimab plus romlusevimab. Using both simulation studies and actual results from graduation assessments of five ACTIV-2 candidate therapeutics, we provide a discussion of lessons learned from our implementation and recommendations for future seamless trials of interventions for emergent infections.

Eliminating latent HIV-1 is a major goal of AIDS research but host factors determining the size of these reservoirs are poorly understood. Here, we investigate the role of host gene expression on HIV-1 reservoir size during suppressive antiretroviral therapy (ART). Peripheral blood cells of fourteen males initiating ART during acute infection and demonstrating effective viral suppression but varying magnitudes of total HIV-1 DNA were characterized by single-cell RNA sequencing. Differential expression analysis demonstrates increased CD14+ monocyte activity in participants having undetectable HIV-1 reservoirs, with IL1B expression inversely associating with reservoir size. This is validated in another cohort of 38 males comprised of different ancestry and HIV-1 subtypes, and with intact proviral DNA assay (IPDA®) measurements. Modeling interactions show monocyte IL1B expression associates inversely with reservoir size at higher frequencies of central memory CD4+ T cells, linking monocyte IL1B expression to cell types known to be reservoirs for persistent HIV-1. Functional analyses reveal that IL1B activates NF-κB, thereby promoting productive HIV-1 infection while simultaneously suppressing viral spread, suggesting a natural latency reversing activity to deplete the reservoir in ART-treated individuals. Altogether, scRNA-seq analyses reveal that monocyte IL1B expression could decrease HIV-1 proviral reservoirs in individuals initiating ART during acute infection.

BACKGROUND:Ensitrelvir, a severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 main protease inhibitor, has demonstrated clinical and virologic efficacy in previous studies. METHODS:In this global phase 3 trial, nonhospitalized adults with mild-to-moderate coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and symptom onset within 5 days were randomized (1:1) to receive once-daily ensitrelvir (375 mg day 1, 125 mg days 2-5) or blinded matching placebo. The primary endpoint was the restricted mean time to sustained (≥2 days) resolution of 15 COVID-19 symptoms, recorded in participant daily diaries, through day 29 in participants starting treatment within 3 days after symptom onset. Virologic efficacy and safety were assessed. RESULTS:Of 2093 participants, 1888 started treatment within 3 days after symptom onset. Mean time to symptom resolution was 12.5 and 13.1 days with ensitrelvir and placebo, respectively (difference, -0.6 days; 95% confidence interval, -1.38 to 0.19; P = .14). On day 4, ensitrelvir reduced least-squares mean RNA by 0.72 log10 copies/mL more than placebo (95% confidence interval, 0.55-0.90). Among those with positive viral cultures at enrollment, 274/287 (95.5%) ensitrelvir-treated versus 210/280 (75.0%) placebo-treated participants had negative cultures on day 4. RNA rebound was similar (<1.5%) between groups. The proportion of participants with ≥1 adverse event was similar with ensitrelvir (61.5%) and placebo (60.6%). No treatment-related serious adverse events or deaths occurred. Three (0.3%) ensitrelvir-treated and 1 (0.1%) placebo-treated participants had COVID-19-related hospitalizations by day 29. CONCLUSIONS:Despite the evidence of antiviral activity with ensitrelvir, this trial did not demonstrate a significant difference in time to sustained symptom resolution. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION NUMBER:NCT05305547.

Background: Despite effective antiretroviral therapy, HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HANDs) remain prevalent, highlighting the need for sensitive biomarkers of early brain alterations. Trace-weighted diffusion spectroscopic imaging offers a non-invasive means to assess microstructural changes in brain metabolites in a single shot by measuring apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) of total N-acetylaspartate (tNAA), total creatine (tCr), total choline (tCho), and water. Methods: In this study, we used trace-weighted single-shot diffusion-weighted radial echo-planar spectroscopic imaging (DW-RESPI) to investigate metabolite diffusion and relative concentrations in the brains of people living with HIV (PLWH). Using a 3T MRI scanner, we studied 16 PLWH and 15 healthy controls (HCs), and we collected two sets of data with low and high b-values from which metabolite ADCs were computed. Metabolite ratios were derived from the low b-value spectra. A brief neuropsychological assessment evaluated attention, executive function, and memory in a subset of subjects. Cognitive and affective performance was quantified using domain-specific deficit scores, as well as depression and anxiety assessments, offering a comprehensive evaluation of neurobehavioral function. In the male subgroup (N = 15) of PLWH, we calculated the correlations between ADC values and neuropsychological domain scores. Results: tNAA, tCr, tCho, and water ADC values were significantly elevated in multiple gray and white matter regions in PLWH compared to HC, with the most pronounced differences observed in the superior precuneus, anterior cingulate cortex, and corona radiata. Notably, regional ADC values and metabolite ratios showed significant correlations with neuropsychological domain scores. Conclusions: These findings indicate the potential of metabolite and water diffusion metrics as biomarkers for HIV-associated microstructural brain alterations and cognitive impairment. However, the small sample size and preliminary nature of this data warrant further investigation to validate these findings.

The United States Government (USG) public-private partnership “Accelerating COVID-19 Treatment Interventions and Vaccines” (ACTIV) was launched to identify safe, effective therapeutics to treat patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and prevent hospitalization, progression of disease, and death. Eleven original master protocols were developed by ACTIV, and thirty-seven therapeutic agents entered evaluation for treatment benefit. Challenges encountered during trial implementation led to innovations enabling initiation and enrollment of over 26,000 participants in the trials. While only two ACTIV trials continue to enroll, the recommendations here reflect information from all the trials as of May 2023. We review clinical trial implementation challenges and corresponding lessons learned to inform future therapeutic clinical trials implemented in response to a public health emergency and the conduct of complex clinical trials during “peacetime,” as well.

Background: Proprotein convertase subtisilin/kexin 9 (PCSK9) raises low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and is associated with inflammation, which is elevated in HIV and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. We compared PCSK9 levels in people with co-occurring HIV and HCV (HIV/HCV) vs. HIV alone, and evaluated the impact of HCV direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy on PCSK9. Design: A prospective, observational cohort study. Methods: Thirty-five adults with HIV/HCV and 37 with HIV alone were evaluated, all with HIV virologic suppression and without documented cardiovascular disease. Circulating PCSK9 and inflammatory biomarkers were measured at baseline and following HCV treatment or at week 52 (for HIV alone) and compared using Wilcoxon tests and Spearman correlations. Results: At baseline, PCSK9 trended higher in HIV/HCV vs. HIV alone (307 vs. 284 ng/ml, P = 0.06). Twenty-nine participants with HIV/HCV completed DAA therapy with sustained virologic response. PCSK9 declined from baseline to posttreatment 1 (median 7.3 weeks after end of therapy [EOT]) and posttreatment 2 (median 43.5 weeks after EOT), reaching levels similar to HIV alone; median within-person reduction was -60.5 ng/ml ( P = 0.003) and -55.6 ng/ml ( P = 0.02), respectively. Decline in PCSK9 correlated with decline in soluble (s)E-selectin and sCD163 ( r = 0.64, P = 0.002; r = 0.58, P = 0.008, respectively), but not with changes in LDL-C or other biomarkers. No significant change in PCSK9 occurred in the HIV alone group over 52 weeks. Conclusion: PCSK9 declined with DAA therapy in participants with HIV/HCV, correlating with declines in several inflammatory biomarkers but not LDL-C. Elevated PCSK9 with HCV may be linked to particular HCV-associated inflammatory pathways more so than cholesterol homeostasis.

Description: In March 2020, the White House Coronavirus Task Force determined that clinicians in the United States needed expert treatment guidelines to optimally manage patients with COVID-19, a potentially life-threatening disease caused by a new pathogen for which no specific treatments were known to be effective. Methods: The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services requested that the National Institutes of Health (NIH) take the lead in expeditiously convening a panel of experts to create "living" guidelines that would be widely accessible and capable of frequent updating as important new information became available. Recommendations: The purpose of this article is to expand on the experiences of the NIH COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel (the Panel) over the past 4 years, summarize the Panel's final recommendations for COVID-19, highlight some challenges and unanswered questions about COVID-19 management, and inform future responses to public health emergencies. The Panel was formed in March 2020, and the first iteration of the guidelines was released in April 2020. Now that the public health emergency has ended, the NIH COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines have sunsetted. This role will now fall to professional societies and organizations, such as the American College of Physicians, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society, and the World Health Organization, all of which have been active in this area.

T cells are involved in protective immunity against numerous viral infections. Data regarding functional roles of human T cells in SARS-CoV-2 (SARS2) viral clearance in primary COVID-19 are limited. To address this knowledge gap, we assessed samples for associations between SARS2 upper respiratory tract viral RNA levels and early virus-specific adaptive immune responses for 95 unvaccinated clinical trial participants with acute primary COVID-19 aged 18-86 years old, approximately half of whom were considered at high risk for progression to severe COVID-19. Functionality and magnitude of acute SARS2-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses were evaluated, in addition to antibody responses. Most individuals with acute COVID-19 developed SARS2-specific T cell responses within 6 days of COVID-19 symptom onset. Early CD4+ T cell and CD8+ T cell responses were polyfunctional, and both strongly associated with reduced upper respiratory tract SARS2 viral RNA, independent of neutralizing antibody titers. Overall, these findings provide evidence for protective roles for circulating SARS2-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells during acute COVID-19.

Background Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) represent a crucial antiviral strategy for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, but it is unclear whether combination mAbs offer a benefit over single-active mAb treatment. Amubarvimab and romlusevimab significantly reduced the risk of hospitalizations or death in the ACTIV-2/A5401 trial. Certain SARS-CoV-2 variants are intrinsically resistant against romlusevimab, leading to only single-active mAb therapy with amubarvimab in these variants. We evaluated virologic outcomes in individuals treated with single- versus dual-active mAbs. Methods Participants were nonhospitalized adults at higher risk of clinical progression randomized to amubarvimab plus romlusevimab or placebo. Quantitative SARS-CoV-2 RNA levels and targeted S-gene next-generation sequencing was performed on anterior nasal samples. We compared viral load kinetics and resistance emergence between individuals treated with effective single- versus dual-active mAbs depending on the infecting variant. Results Study participants receiving single- or dual-active mAbs had similar demographics, baseline nasal viral load, symptom score, and symptom duration. Compared with single-active mAb treatment, treatment with dual-active mAbs led to faster viral load decline at study days 3 (P < .001) and 7 (P < .01). Treatment-emergent resistance mutations were more likely to be detected after amubarvimab plus romlusevimab treatment than with placebo (2.6% vs 0%; P < .001) and were more frequently detected in the setting of single-active compared with dual-active mAb treatment (7.3% vs 1.1%; P < .01). Single-active and dual-active mAb treatment resulted in similar decrease in rates of hospitalizations or death. Conclusions Compared with single-active mAb therapy, dual-active mAbs led to similar clinical outcomes but significantly faster viral load decline and a lower risk of emergent resistance.

Therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have been studied in humans, but the impact on immune memory of mAb treatment during an ongoing infection remains unclear. We evaluated the effect of infusion of the anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spike receptor-binding domain (RBD) mAb bamlanivimab on memory B cells (MBCs) in SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals. Bamlanivimab treatment skewed the repertoire of MBCs targeting spike toward non-RBD epitopes. Furthermore, the relative affinity of RBD MBCs was weaker in mAb-treated individuals compared to placebo-treated individuals over time. Subsequently, after mRNA coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination, MBC differences persisted and mapped to a specific reduction in recognition of the class II RBD site, the same RBD epitope recognized by bamlanivimab. These findings indicate a substantial role of antibody feedback in regulating MBC responses to infection, and single mAb administration can continue to impact MBC responses to additional antigen exposures months later. We report for the first time the effect of monoclonal antibody (mAb) treatment on SARS-CoV-2-specific human memory B cells of SARS-CoV-2-infected humans receiving, or not receiving, mRNA immunization. Our data show that mAb treatment alters later immune memory responses to vaccination.

Background:People with HIV-1 often have chronic inflammation leading to severe non-AIDS morbidity and mortality. The AIDS Clinical Trials Group Study A5314 sought to lower inflammation with low-dose methotrexate (LDMTX). The primary study outcomes were reported previously but here we present the impact of LDMTX on multiple measures of HIV-1 persistence.Methods:A5314 was a phase 2 randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial in 176 adult people with HIV-1 on virally suppressive antiretroviral therapy. LDMTX (5-15 mg/wk) was administered for 24 weeks with an additional 12 weeks of participant follow-up. The current analyses of HIV-1 persistence were restricted to 60 participants (30 LDMTX and 30 placebo) randomly selected from the total population. Plasma HIV-1 RNA, total HIV-1 DNA, and cell-associated HIV-1 RNA (CA HIV-1 RNA) were measured by sensitive quantitative PCR assays.Results:LDMTX treatment had no significant effect on sensitive measures of plasma HIV-1 RNA, HIV-1 DNA, CA HIV-1 RNA, or CA HIV-1 RNA/DNA ratio at any time point or from baseline to week 24. As observed in the main study, absolute peripheral CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell numbers decreased from baseline to week 24 among the 30 participants receiving LDMTX compared with placebo (median decrease of -31.5 CD4+ T cells/mu L, -83.5 CD8+ T cells/mu L).Conclusions:LDMTX had no significant effect on any measure of HIV-1 persistence in plasma or peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Further studies are needed to determine whether other immunosuppressive and/or immunoreductive interventions are safe and capable of affecting HIV-1 persistence.