Introduction: Metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) alone may be effective in preventing disease progression and positively affecting overall survival (OS) in oligometastatic prostate cancer (OMPC). Objective: We systematically reviewed the current literature to analyse the biological rationale for integrating MDT into treatment strategies for OMPC and investigate the current evidence on its role in OMPC. Evidence acquisition: MEDLINE/PUBMED and the EMBASE Database were systematically searched to identify eligible reports published up to January 2024. The proceedings of the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology, European Society of Medical Oncology, American Society for Radiation Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology, European Uro-Oncology Group, and American Urological Association annual meetings were analysed. Results: Eighteen studies published between 2014 and 2024 were selected for the analysis. The studies included 1058 patients treated with metastasis-directed radiotherapy. No statistically significant differences were found in terms of treatment-escalation-free survival between hormone-naïve patients treated with MDT alone and those treated with MDT and hormonal manipulation. By contrast, the combination treatment significantly increased both 2 year and 4 year disease-progression-free survival (DPFS) rates (p-values < 0.00001 and 0.006, respectively). In patients with castration-sensitive disease treated with MDT alone, the estimated 2 year and 4 year OS rates were 96.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 92.9–100%) and 89.1% (95% CI, 82.3–96.5%), respectively. The estimated 2 year and 4 year overall survival rates in the combination treatment group were 86.1% (95% CI 79.2–93.7%) and 74.8% (95% CI 64.6.3–86.5%), respectively. Conclusions: MDT alone is associated with promising outcomes in OMPC and represents a valuable, valid, and often preferable strategy. Combined with ADT improves significantly disease-progression-free survival, but its impact on overall survival remains uncertain. Given these findings, the decision to incorporate ADT should be tailored to individual patient characteristics and clinical context. Future research should integrate biomarker-based approaches to optimise MDT use and select the best candidates for a multimodal approach.

Background: Radiotherapy (RT) is a mainstay treatment for prostate cancer (PC). Accurate delineation of organs at risk (OARs) is crucial for optimizing the therapeutic window by minimizing side effects. Manual segmentation is time-consuming and prone to inter-operator variability. This study investigates the performance of Limbus® Contour® (LC), a deep learning-based auto-contouring software, in delineating pelvic structures in PC patients. Methods: We evaluated LC’s performance on key structures (bowel bag, bladder, rectum, sigmoid colon, and pelvic lymph nodes) in 52 patients. We compared auto-contoured structures with those manually delineated by radiation oncologists using different metrics. Results: LC achieved good agreement for the bladder (median Dice: 0.95) and rectum (median Dice: 0.83). However, limitations were observed for the bowel bag (median Dice: 0.64) and sigmoid colon (median Dice: 0.6), with inclusion of irrelevant structures. While the median Dice for pelvic lymph nodes was acceptable (0.73), the software lacked sub-regional differentiation, limiting its applicability in certain other oncologic settings. Conclusions: LC shows promise for automating OAR delineation in prostate radiotherapy, particularly for the bladder and rectum. Improvements are needed for bowel bag, sigmoid colon, and lymph node sub-regionalization. Further validation with a broader and larger patient cohort is recommended to assess generalizability.

Real-world evidence on quality of life (QoL) changes associated with treatment decisions is crucial for informed choices by patients with low-risk prostate cancer (LRPC). A prospective cohort study was conducted in the Piemonte and Valle d’Aosta Regional Oncology Network, NW Italy (4.5 million population), including nearly all urology (N = 22) and radiation oncology (N = 6) centres. Patients newly diagnosed with LRPC, eligible for radical treatments, received balanced information on risks and benefits of available options and could choose among active surveillance (AS), radical prostatectomy (RP), or radiotherapy (RT). Longitudinal changes in QoL were assessed via patient-reported outcomes in four domains: general QoL, mental health, sexual function and urinary/bowel symptoms. The main comparison was between AS and RP. A secondary comparison was between AS and all radical treatments (RP or RT). Data were analysed by multivariable generalised linear or logistic models, following the intention-to-treat principle and accounting for correlation within centres and subjects. A total of 651 patients (76.4

Background and purpose: Given the substantial lack of knowledge, we aimed to assess clinical/dosimetry predictors of late hematological toxicity on patients undergoing pelvic-nodes irradiation (PNI) for prostate cancer (PCa) within a prospective multi-institute study. Materials and methods: Clinical/dosimetry/blood test data were prospectively collected including lymphocytes count (ALC) at baseline, mid/end-PNI, 3/6 months and every 6 months up to 5-year after PNI. DVHs of the Body, ileum (BMILEUM), lumbosacral spine (BMLS), lower pelvis (BMPELVIS), and whole pelvis (BMTOT) were extracted. Current analysis focused on 2-year CTCAEv4.03 Grade >= 2 (G2+) lymphopenia (ALC < 800/mu L). DVH parameters that better discriminate patients with/without toxicity were first identified. After data pre-processing to limit overfitting, a multi-variable logistic regression model combining DVH and clinical information was identified and internally validated by bootstrap. Results: Complete data of 499 patients were available: 46 patients (9.2 %) experienced late G2+ lymphopenia. DVH parameters of BMLS/BMPELVIS/BMTOT and Body were associated to increased G2+ lymphopenia. The variables retained in the resulting model were ALC at baseline [HR = 0.997, 95 %CI 0.996-0.998, p < 0.0001], smoke (yes/no) [HR = 2.9, 95 %CI 1.25-6.76, p = 0.013] and BMLS-V >= 24 Gy (cc) [HR = 1.006, 95 %CI 1.002-1.011, p = 0.003]. When acute G3+ lymphopenia (yes/no) was considered, it was retained in the model [HR = 4.517, 95 %CI 1.954-10.441, p = 0.0004]. Performances of the models were relatively high (AUC = 0.87/ 0.88) and confirmed by validation. Conclusions: Two-year lymphopenia after PNI for PCa is largely modulated by baseline ALC, with an independent role of acute G3+ lymphopenia. BMLS-V24 was the best dosimetry predictor: constraints for BMTOT (V10Gy < 1520 cc, V20Gy < 1250 cc, V30Gy < 850 cc), and BMLS (V24y < 307 cc) were suggested to potentially reduce the risk.

Background & Aims: The average five-year survival of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) is 71%. However, there is significant variability in patient prognosis. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been introduced into the treatment landscape of mRCC. This meta -analysis aimed to estimate progression -free and overall survival probabilities and identify possible outcome predictors of mRCC patients treated with ICI combination as first -line treatment. Methods: Studies comparing the combination of ICI combinations versus standard of therapy for first -line treatment of advanced renal -cell carcinoma were searched in MEDLINE, CANCERLIT, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, and the Cochrane Library from inception through September 2023. Data on patient populations and outcomes were extracted from each study by three independent observers and combined using the DerSimonian and Laird methods. Results: Six studies met the inclusion criteria. Globally, 5121 patients were included in this meta -analysis: 2556 patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors and 2565 with sunitinib as control. The ICI combination was associated with improved PFS (hazard ratio (HR) 0.68; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 0.56 -0.81, p < 0.0001). Furthermore, ICI combination was also associated with OS improvement (HR 0.85; 95 % CI, 0.78 -0.92, p = 0.001). There is no statistical increase in adverse events. Conclusions: Our findings show that PFS and OS are statistically increased in mRCC with ICI combination treatment by 32% and 15%, respectively.

Background and Purpose To quantify patient-reported 2-year intestinal toxicity (IT) from pelvic nodal irradiation (PNI) for prostate cancer. The association between baseline/acute symptoms and 2-year worsening was investigated. Materials and Methods Patient-reported IT was prospectively assessed through the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ), filled in at baseline, radiotherapy mid-point and end, at 3 and 6 months and every 6 months until 5 years. Two-year deterioration of IBDQ scores relative to the Bowel Domain was investigated for 400 patients with no severe baseline symptoms and with questionnaires available at baseline, 2 years, RT mid-point and/or end and at least three follow-ups between 3 and 18 months. The significance of the 2-year differences from baseline was tested. The association between baseline values and ΔAcute (the worst decline between baseline and RT mid-point/end) was investigated. Results In the IBDQ lower scores indicate worse symptoms. A significant (p<0.0001) 2-year mean worsening, mostly in the range of -0.2/-0.4 points on a 1-7 scale, emerged excepting one question (IBDQ29, "nausea/feeling sick"). This decline was independent of treatment intent while baseline values were associated with 2-year absolute scores. The ΔAcute largely modulated 2-year worsening: patients with ΔAcute greater than the first quartile (Q1) and ΔAcute less or equal than Q1 showed no/minimal and highly significant (p<0.0001) deterioration, respectively. Rectal incontinence, urgency, frequency and abdominal pain showed the largest mean changes (-0.5/-1): risk of severe worsening (deemed to be of clinical significance if ≤2) was 3-5 fold higher in the ΔAcute≤Q1 vs ΔAcute >Q1 group (p<0.0001). Conclusion A modest but significant deterioration of two-year patient-reported intestinal symptoms from PNI compared to baseline was found. Patients experiencing more severe acute symptoms are at higher risk of symptom persistence at 2 years, with a much larger prevalence of clinically significant symptoms.

PurposeTo evaluate the persistence of symptoms after radiotherapy (RT) for localised prostate cancer (PCa) and the association with quality of life (QOL).Materials and methodsProspective patient-reported outcome (PRO) from a multi-institutional study on PCa treated with radical RT (2010-2014) was analysed. Data was collected at baseline (BL) and follow-ups (FUPs) up to 5 years. Patients with BL and >= 3 late FUPs (>= 6 months) were analysed. PRO was scored by means of the IPSS and ICIQ-SF (urinary), LENT-SOMA (gastrointestinal [GI]), and EORTC-C30 (pain, insomnia, fatigue, and QOL) questionnaires. Symptoms were defined 'persistent' if the median score over FUPs was >= 3 (urinary) or >= 2 (GI, pain, insomnia, and fatigue), and worse than BL. Different thresholds were chosen to have enough events for each symptom. QOL was linearly transformed on a continuous scale (0-100). Linear-mixed models were used to identify significant differences between groups with and without persistent symptoms including age, smoking status, previous abdominal surgery, and diabetes as confounders. Mean QOL differences between groups were evaluated longitudinally over FUPs.ResultsThe analysis included 293 patients. Persistent urinary symptoms ranged from 2% (straining) to 12% (weak stream, and nocturia). Gastrointestinal symptoms ranged from 7% (rectal pain, and incontinence) to 30% (urgency). Proportions of pain, insomnia, and fatigue were 6, 13, and 18%. Significant QOL differences of small-to-medium clinical relevance were found for urinary incontinence, frequency, urgency, and nocturia. Among GI symptoms, rectal pain and incontinence showed small-to-medium differences. Fatigue was associated with the largest differences.ConclusionsThe analysis showed that symptoms after RT for PCa occur with different persistence and their association with QOL varies in magnitude. A number of persistent urinary and GI symptoms showed differences in a comparable range. Urinary incontinence and frequency, rectal pain, and faecal incontinence more often had significant associations. Fatigue was also prevalent and associated with largely deteriorated QOL.

Background: Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the standard treatment for T3-4 rectal cancer. Here, we compared image-guided and intensity-modulated RT (IG-IMRT) with a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) (instead of concomitant chemotherapy) versus CRT in a multi-centric randomized trial. Methods: cT3-4 rectal cancer patients were randomly assigned to receive preoperative IG-IMRT 46 Gy/23 fractions plus capecitabine 825 mg/m² twice daily (CRT arm) or IG-IMRT 46 Gy/23 fractions with an SIB to the rectal tumor up to a total dose of 55.2 Gy (RTSIB arm). Results: A total of 174 patients were randomly assigned between April 2010 and May 2014. Grade 3 acute toxicities were 6% and 4% in the CRT and RTSIB arms, respectively. The mean fractional change in SUVmax at 5 weeks after completion of preoperative RT were −55.8% (±24.0%) and −52.9% (±21.6%) for patients in the CRT arm and RTSIB arm, respectively (p = 0.43). The pathologic complete response rate was 24% with CRT compared to 14% with RTSIB. There were no differences in 5-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) or local control (LC). Conclusions: The preoperative RTSIB approach was not inferior to CRT in terms of metabolic response, toxicity, OS, PFS and LC, and could be considered an available option for patients unfit for fluorouracil-based CRT.

Importance:Although active surveillance for patients with low-risk prostate cancer (LRPC) has been recommended for years, its adoption at the population level is often limited.Objective:To make active surveillance available for patients with LRPC using a research framework and to compare patient characteristics and clinical outcomes between those who receive active surveillance vs radical treatments at diagnosis.Design, Setting, and Participants:This population-based, prospective cohort study was designed by a large multidisciplinary group of specialists and patients' representatives. The study was conducted within all 18 urology centers and 7 radiation oncology centers in the Piemonte and Valle d'Aosta Regional Oncology Network in Northwest Italy (approximate population, 4.5 million). Participants included patients with a new diagnosis of LRPC from June 2015 to December 2021. Data were analyzed from January to May 2023.Exposure:At diagnosis, all patients were informed of the available treatment options by the urologist and received an information leaflet describing the benefits and risks of active surveillance compared with active treatments, either radical prostatectomy (RP) or radiation treatment (RT). Patients choosing active surveillance were actively monitored with regular prostate-specific antigen testing, clinical examinations, and a rebiopsy at 12 months.Main Outcomes and Measures:Outcomes of interest were proportion of patients choosing active surveillance or radical treatments, overall survival, and, for patients in active surveillance, treatment-free survival. Comparisons were analyzed with multivariable logistic or Cox models, considering centers as clusters.Results:A total of 852 male patients (median [IQR] age, 70 [64-74] years) were included, and 706 patients (82.9%) chose active surveillance, with an increasing trend over time; 109 patients (12.8%) chose RP, and 37 patients (4.3%) chose RT. Median (IQR) follow-up was 57 (41-76) months. Worse prostate cancer prognostic factors were negatively associated with choosing active surveillance (eg, stage T2a vs T1c: odds ratio [OR], 0.51; 95% CI, 0.28-0.93), while patients who were older (eg, age ≥75 vs <65 years: OR, 4.27; 95% CI, 1.98-9.22), had higher comorbidity (Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥2 vs 0: OR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.02-3.85), underwent an independent revision of the first prostate biopsy (OR, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.26-4.38) or underwent a multidisciplinary assessment (OR, 2.65; 95% CI, 1.38-5.11) were more likely to choose active surveillance vs active treatment. After adjustment, center at which a patient was treated continued to be an important factor in the choice of treatment (intraclass correlation coefficient, 18.6%). No differences were detected in overall survival between active treatment and active surveillance. Treatment-free survival in the active surveillance cohort was 59.0% (95% CI, 54.8%-62.9%) at 24 months, 54.5% (95% CI, 50.2%-58.6%) at 36 months, and 47.0% (95% CI, 42.2%-51.7%) at 48 months.Conclusions and Relevance:In this population-based cohort study of patients with LRPC, a research framework at system level as well as favorable prognostic factors, a multidisciplinary approach, and an independent review of the first prostate biopsy at patient-level were positively associated with high uptake of active surveillance, a practice largely underused before this study.

In recent years, significant changes have occurred in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) management, where docetaxel and new androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPI) have been shown to improve overall survival (OS) compared to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Recent data could once again radically change mHSPC treatment. PEACE-1 and ARASENS trials demonstrated a survival benefit of the addition of ARPI to docetaxel and ADT combination (triplet therapy), compared to docetaxel and ADT. With multiple options to choose from, it is crucial to identify the patients who would benefit most from triplet therapy. In this meta-analysis, we evaluated the activity of the triplet therapy versus docetaxel plus ADT in mHSPC. A systematic review of PubMed/Medline, Embase, and the proceedings of major international meetings was performed. Five RCTs fulfilled the inclusion criteria. PEACE-1 and ARASENS studies reported disease-free survival (DFS) and OS. Post hoc analysis of three other trials evaluated the combination of ARPI, docetaxel and ADT. Globally, 2538 patients were included (1270 triplet therapy; 1268 docetaxel + ADT). Triplet therapy was associated with improved OS (hazard ratio (HR) 0.74; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.66–0.83, p < 0.00001). A statistically significant benefit was shown in high-volume mHSPC patients (HR 0.76; 95% CI 0.59–0.97, p = 0.03) and in patients with de novo metastatic disease (HR 0.73; 95% CI, 0.64–0.82, p < 0.00001). The addition of ARPI to standard therapy was associated with DFS improvement (HR 0.41; 95% CI, 0.35–0.49, p < 0.00001). This metanalysis shows a significant OS benefit from concomitant administration of ARPI, docetaxel and ADT in high volume and de novo mHSPC.

Background and purpose: A prognostic scoring system based on laboratory inflammation parameters, [Hemo-Eosinophils-Inflammation (HEI) index], including baseline hemoglobin level, the systemic inflam-matory index and eosinophil count was recently proposed in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (ASCC). HEI was shown to discriminate disease-free (DFS) and overall (OS) survival in ASCC patients treated with concurrent chemoradiation (CRT). We tested the accuracy of the model on a mul-ticentric cohort for external validation.Materials and methods: Patients treated with CRT were enrolled. The Kaplan-Meier curves for DFS and OS based on HEI risk group were calculated and the log-rank test was used. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the prognostic factors for DFS and OS. The exponential of the regression coefficients provided an estimate of the hazard ratio (HR). For model discrimination, we determined Harrell's C -index, Gonen & Heller K Index and the explained variation on the log relative hazard scale.Results: A total of 877 patients was available. Proportional hazards were adjusted for age, gender, tumor -stage, and chemotherapy. Two-year DFS was 77 %(95 %CI:72.0-82.4) and 88.3 %(95 %CI:84.8-92.0 %) in the HEI high-and low-risk groups. Two-year OS was 87.8 %(95 %CI:83.7-92.0) and 94.2 %(95 %CI:91.5- 97). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards model showed a HR = 2.02(95 %CI:1.25-3.26; p = 0.004) for the HEI high-risk group with respect to OS and a HR = 1.53(95 %CI:1.04-2.24; p = 0.029) for DFS. Harrel C-indexes were 0.68 and 0.66 in the validation dataset, for OS and DFS. Gonen-Heller K indexes were 0.67 and 0.71, respectively.Conclusion: The HEI index proved to be a prognosticator in ASCC patients treated with CRT. Model dis-crimination in the external validation cohort was acceptable.(c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Radiotherapy and Oncology 177 (2022) 9-15

Background and purpose: Explainable models of long-term risk of biochemical failure (BF) after post-prostatectomy salvage radiotherapy (SRT) are lacking. A previously introduced radiobiology-based formula was adapted to incorporate the impact of pelvic nodes irradiation (PNI).Materials and methods: The risk of post-SRT BF may be expressed by a Poisson-based equation including pre-SRT PSA, the radiosensitivity a, the clonogen density C, the prescribed dose (in terms of EQD2, a/b = 1. 5 Gy) and a factor (1-BxkxPSA) accounting for clonogens outside the irradiated volume, being k the recovery due to PNI. Data of 795 pT2-pT3, pN0/pN1/pNx (n = 627/94/74) patients with follow-up >= 5 ye ars and pre-RT PSA <= 2 ng/mL were randomly split into training (n = 528) and validation (n = 267) cohorts; the training cohort data were fitted by the least square method. Separate fits were performed for different risk groups. Model performances were assessed by calibration plots and tested in the validation group.Results: The median follow-up was 8.5y, median pre-SRT PSA and EQD2 were 0.43 ng/mL and 71.3 Gy respectively; 331/795 pts received PNI. The most clinically significant prognostic grouping was pT3b and/or ISUP4-5 versus pT2/3a and ISUP1-3. Best-fit parameters were aeff = 0.26/0.23 Gy-1, C = 107/107, B = 0.40/0.97, k = 0.87/0.41 for low/high-risk group. Performances were confirmed in the validation group (slope = 0.89,R2 = 0.85). Results suggested optimal SRT dose at 70-74 Gy. The estimated reduction of postSRT BF due to PNI at these dose values was > 5 % for PSA > 1/>0.15 ng/mL for low/high-risk patients, being > 10 % for high-risk patients with pre-SRT PSA > 0.25 ng/mL.Conclusion: An explainable one-size-fits-all equation satisfactorily predicts long-term risk of post-SRT BF. The model was independently validated. A calculator tool was made available.(c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Radiotherapy and Oncology 175 (2022) 26-32

Purpose of Review Determining the risk for progression or survival after standard androgen deprivation treatment (ADT) in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) is essential for stratifying patients according to expected outcomes in future studies of treatment combination. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to estimate the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) probabilities in the control group of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of different regimens of standard androgen deprivation treatment (ADT) in mHSPC and to identify possible predictors of outcomes. Recent Findings Studies reporting time-dependent outcomes (progression or death) after standard ADT treatment of mHSPC were searched in MEDLINE, CANCERLIT, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, and the Cochrane Library from inception through June 2021. Data on patient populations and outcomes were extracted from each study by three independent observers and combined using a distribution-free summary survival curve. Primary outcomes were actuarial probabilities of disease progression and survival. Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria. The pooled estimate of the actuarial PFS rate was 35.2% at two years. The pooled actuarial OS rate was 62.5% at three years. Heterogeneity among studies was highly significant for all outcomes. By univariate meta-regression analyses, high-volume disease and the presence of visceral metastases were associated with shorter survival. Summary Our findings show that PFS and OS are highly variable in patients with mHSPC treated with ADT, providing a helpful benchmark for indirect comparisons of the benefits of the combination of chemotherapy and second-generation hormonotherapy.

Background/Aim: The aim of the study was to investigate boost volume definition, doses, and delivery techniques for rectal cancer dose intensification. Patients and Methods: An online survey was made on 25 items (characteristics, simulation, imaging, volumes, doses, planning and treatment). Results: Thirty-eight radiation oncologists joined the study. Twenty-one delivered long-course radiotherapy with dose intensification. Boost volume was delineated on diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in 18 centres (85.7%), and computed tomography (CT) and/or positron emission tomography-CT in 9 (42.8%); 16 centres (76.2%) performed co-registration with CT-simulation. Boost dose was delivered on gross tumor volume in 10 centres (47.6%) and on clinical target volume in 11 (52.4%). The most common total dose was 54-55 Gy (71.4%), with moderate hypofractionation (85.7%). Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) was used in all centres, with simultaneous integrated boost in 17 (80.8%) and image-guidance in 18 (85.7%). Conclusion: A high quality of treatment using dose escalation can be inferred by widespread multidisciplinary discussion, MRI-based treatment volume delineation, and radiation delivery relying on IMRT with accurate image-guided radiation therapy protocols.