IntroductionAfter an acute infection with the corona virus 10-20% of those affected suffer from ongoing or new symptoms. A causal therapy for the phenomenon known as Long/Post-COVID is still lacking and specific therapies addressing psychosocial needs of these patients are imperatively needed. The aim of the PsyLoCo-study is developing and piloting a psychotherapeutic manual, which addresses Long/Post-COVID-related psychosocial needs and supports in coping with persistent bodily symptoms as well as depressive or anxiety symptoms.Methods and analysisThis pilot trial implements a multi-centre, 2-arm (N=120; allocation ratio: 1:1), parallel group, randomised controlled design. The pilot trial is designed to test the feasibility and estimate the effect of 1) a 12-session psychotherapeutic intervention compared to 2) a wait-list control condition on psychosocial needs as well as bodily and affective symptoms in patients suffering from Long/Post-COVID. The intervention uses an integrative, manualized, psychotherapeutic approach. The primary study outcome is health-related quality of life. Outcome variables will be assessed at three timepoints, pre-intervention (t1), post-intervention (t2) and three months after completed intervention (t3). To determine the primary outcome, changes from t1 to t2 are examined. The analysis will be used for the planning of the RCT to test the efficacy of the developed intervention.DiscussionThe pilot study will evaluate a 12-session treatment manual for Long/Post-COVID sufferers and the therapy components it contains. The analysis will provide insights into the extent to which psychotherapeutic treatment approaches improve the symptoms of Long/Post-COVID sufferers. The treatment manual is designed to be carried out by psychotherapists as well as people with basic training in psychotherapeutic techniques. This approach was chosen to enable a larger number of practitioners to provide therapeutic support for Long/Post-COVID patients. After completion of the pilot study, it is planned to follow up with a randomized controlled study and to develop a treatment guideline for general practitioners and interested specialists.Trial registrationThe pilot trial has been registered with the German Clinical Trials Register (Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien; Trial-ID: DRKS00030866; URL: https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00030866) on March 7, 2023.

Patients with cancer might be particularly prone to stress caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of pandemic-related stressors on oncological patients' psychological well-being. During the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany 122 cancer out-patients of the Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich reported on COVID-19-related stressors (information satisfaction, threat perception, and fear of disease deterioration) and answered standardized questionnaires for psychosocial distress (DT) as well as depression and anxiety symptoms (PHQ-2, GAD-2). Multiple linear regression analyses were used to identify associations of the COVID-19-related stressors with psychological symptoms, controlling for sociodemographic, psychological (self-efficacy, ASKU) and clinical (somatic symptom burden, SSS-8) variables. Initially, satisfaction with information was significantly negatively associated with all three outcome variables. Fear of disease deterioration was associated with distress and depressive symptoms. After controlling for additional variables, only satisfaction with information remained an independent determinant of anxiety (beta = -0.35, p < 0.001). All three outcomes were most strongly determined by somatic symptom burden (beta >= 0.40, p < 0.001). The results of this study tentatively suggest that physical well-being overrides the relevance of some COVID-19-related stressors for oncological patients' psychological wellbeing. Physical symptoms are strongly tied to personal wellbeing as they are associated with suffering from cancer, which might be more central to personal wellbeing than the possibility of getting infected with SARS-CoV-2. However, satisfaction with the information received seems to be important beyond physical wellbeing, as this emerged as an independent determinant of anxiety.

Die psychoonkologische Versorgung von Krebspatienten ist fester Bestandteil einer umfassenden onkologischen Behandlung. Im klinischen Alltag zeigen sich jedoch vielfältige Herausforderungen hinsichtlich der Inanspruchnahme entsprechender Angebote. Welche Barrieren finden sich in der Inanspruchnahme psychoonkologischer Versorgung? Vorliegende Arbeit gibt einen narrativen Überblick ausgewählter relevanter Ergebnisse zu individuellen Barrieren aus Patientenperspektive, Barrieren hinsichtlich Informationen über psychoonkologische Versorgung und Einstellungen zur Psychoonkologie sowie über strukturelle Barrieren. Mehr als die Hälfte der psychisch belasteten Patienten nimmt keine psychoonkologische Versorgung in Anspruch. Hinsichtlich individueller Barrieren zeigt sich, dass der Zeitpunkt, die Art und Weise, wie Patientinnen und Patienten die eigene psychische Belastung wahrnehmen, und das Vorhandensein persönlicher/sozialer Ressourcen das Inanspruchnahmeverhalten beeinflussen. Viele Patienten sind nicht ausreichend über Modalitäten und Wirkweisen psychoonkologischer Versorgung informiert. Strukturelle Barrieren ergeben sich in der Finanzierung psychoonkologischer Versorgung sowie in der Erfassung und Dokumentation des Versorgungsbedarfs. Mit niederschwelliger, verständlicher und leicht zugänglicher Information hinsichtlich Modalitäten und Wirkweisen der Unterstützung kann individuellen Vorbehalten begegnet werden. Eine enge interdisziplinäre Zusammenarbeit ist hierbei bedeutsam. Mithilfe einer geregelten Finanzierung, einer flächendeckenden Erhebung und Dokumentation des Bedarfs (Distress-Screening) sowie den Möglichkeiten digitaler Lösungen kann Barrieren auf struktureller Ebene begegnet werden.

Background Today, the psycho-oncological care of cancer patients is an integral part of comprehensive oncological treatment. However, there are many barriers regarding the utilization of psycho-oncological support in everyday clinical practice. Objectives What are the barriers to the utilization of psycho-oncological care? Materials and methods This paper gives a narrative overview of available empirical evidence regarding individual barriers from the patient's perspective, barriers regarding information and personal attitudes towards psycho-oncology as well as structural barriers. Results More than 50% of clinically distressed patients with cancer do not use psycho-oncological support. With regard to individual barriers, it is shown that the timing, the way patients perceive their own psychological distress and the availability of personal/social resources have an impact on the utilization of psycho-oncological support offers. In addition, many patients are not sufficiently informed about the modalities and effects of psycho-oncological care. Structural barriers arise in the financing of these support offers as well as in the recording and documentation of patients' needs for psycho-oncological care. Conclusions Individual concerns regarding psycho-oncological support can be addressed with low-threshold, comprehensible and easily accessible information about the modalities and effects of psycho-oncological support. Close interdisciplinary cooperation is important here. Regulated funding, consequent recording and documentation of the psychosocial support needs (via distress screening), as well as digital solutions may reduce barriers on a structural level.

Background This study investigates current needs and psychosocial burden of out-patients with cancer during the COVID-19-Pandemic. Material and Methods Between 11/2020 and 02/2021 122 cancer patients who underwent out-patient treatment at the Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich participated in the study. Based on a standardized, semi-structured interview, participants were asked about their knowledge and informational needs related to COVID-19, risk perception and concerns regarding continuing out-patient treatment, COVID-19 related distress, confidence in the national health system, and their readiness to get vaccinated against COVID-19. Additionally, patients filled out the distress thermometer (DT). Results More than a third of the patients (34,2 %, n = 41/120) wanted to receive more information about the effects of the coronavirus on their cancer and their treatment. 17,2 % (n = 21/122) had faced changes concerning their current or planned treatment. 42/121 (34,7 %) of the patients were clinically distressed (DT >= 5). A possible overload of the health care system was the most commonly reported COVID-related concern (77,9 %, n = 95/122), followed by being concerned that their family members might be additionally worried about them (56,2 %, n = 68/121). 71,2 % (n = 74/104) of the patients are willing to be vaccinated; 60 % (n = 18/30) of those undecided or refusing at the time of the survey expressed a desire to have a consultation with an oncologist before giving their final consent to vaccination. Discussion Corona-specific distress of cancer patients relates in particular to the course of therapy, but also to a possible overload of the health care system. Oncology care teams should allow space for questions from their patients, acknowledge possible uncertainties, provide emotional support, and draw attention to reliable sources of information.

(1) Background: Health care workers (HCWs) play a key role in increasing anti-COVID vaccination rates. Fear of potential side effects is one of the main reasons for vaccine hesitancy. We investigated which side effects are of concern to HCWs and how these are associated with vaccine hesitancy. (2) Methods: Data were collected in an online survey in February 2021 among HCWs from across Germany with 4500 included participants. Free-text comments on previously experienced vaccination side effects, and fear of short- and long-term side effects of the COVID-19 vaccination were categorized and analyzed. (3) Results: Most feared short-term side effects were vaccination reactions, allergic reactions, and limitations in daily life. Most feared long-term side effects were (auto-) immune reactions, neurological side effects, and currently unknown long-term consequences. Concerns about serious vaccination side effects were associated with vaccination refusal. There was a clear association between refusal of COVID-19 vaccination in one's personal environment and fear of side effects. (4) Conclusions: Transparent information about vaccine side effects is needed, especially for HCW. Especially when the participants' acquaintances advised against vaccination, they were significantly more likely to fear side effects. Thus, further education of HCW is necessary to achieve good information transfer in clusters as well.

Background This study investigates current needs and psychosocial burden of out-patients with cancer during the COVID-19-Pandemic. Material and Methods Between 11/2020 and 02/2021 122 cancer patients who underwent out-patient treatment at the Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich participated in the study. Based on a standardized, semi-structured interview, participants were asked about their knowledge and informational needs related to COVID-19, risk perception and concerns regarding continuing out-patient treatment, COVID-19 related distress, confidence in the national health system, and their readiness to get vaccinated against COVID-19. Additionally, patients filled out the distress thermometer (DT). Results More than a third of the patients (34,2 %, n = 41/120) wanted to receive more information about the effects of the coronavirus on their cancer and their treatment. 17,2 % (n = 21/122) had faced changes concerning their current or planned treatment. 42/121 (34,7 %) of the patients were clinically distressed (DT >= 5). A possible overload of the health care system was the most commonly reported COVID-related concern (77,9 %, n = 95/122), followed by being concerned that their family members might be additionally worried about them (56,2 %, n = 68/121). 71,2 % (n = 74/104) of the patients are willing to be vaccinated; 60 % (n = 18/30) of those undecided or refusing at the time of the survey expressed a desire to have a consultation with an oncologist before giving their final consent to vaccination. Discussion Corona-specific distress of cancer patients relates in particular to the course of therapy, but also to a possible overload of the health care system. Oncology care teams should allow space for questions from their patients, acknowledge possible uncertainties, provide emotional support, and draw attention to reliable sources of information.

Objective To improve allocation of psychosocial care and to provide patient-oriented support offers, identification of determinants of elevated distress is needed. So far, there is a lack of evidence investigating the interplay between individual disposition and current clinical and psychosocial determinants of distress in the inpatient setting. Methods In this cross-sectional study, we investigated 879 inpatients with different cancer sites treated in a German Comprehensive Cancer Center. Assessment of determinants of elevated distress included sociodemographic, clinical and psychosocial characteristics as well as dimensions of personality. Multiple linear regression was applied to identify determinants of psychosocial distress. Results Mean age of the patients was M = 61.9 (SD = 11.8), 48.1% were women. In the multiple linear regression model younger age (beta = -0.061, p = 0.033), higher neuroticism (beta = 0.178, p = <0.001), having metastases (beta = 0.091, p = 0.002), being in a worse physical condition (beta = 0.380, p = <0.001), depressive symptoms (beta = 0.270, p = <0.001), not feeling well informed about psychological support (beta = 0.054, p = 0.046) and previous uptake of psychological treatment (beta = 0.067, p = 0.020) showed significant associations with higher psychosocial distress. The adjusted R-2 of the overall model was 0.464. Conclusion Controlling for sociodemographic characteristics and dispositional vulnerability, that is neuroticism, current clinical and psychosocial characteristics were still associated with hospitalized patients' psychosocial distress. Psycho-oncologists should address both, the more transient emotional responses, such as depressive symptoms, as well as more enduring patient characteristics, like neuroticism.

Zusammenfassung Hintergrund Diese Studie untersucht aktuelle Bedürfnisse und Belastungen von ambulanten Krebspatienten im Rahmen der COVID-19-Pandemie. Material und Methoden Zwischen 11/2020 und 02/2021 wurden 122 ambulante Krebspatientinnen und -patienten des Comprehensive Cancer Center München in die Studie eingeschlossen und anhand eines standardisierten, halbstrukturierten Interviews zu Wissensstand und Informationsbedürfnissen in Bezug auf COVID-19, Risikowahrnehmung und Sorgen hinsichtlich der ambulanten Krebsbehandlung, COVID-19-spezifischen Belastungen sowie zum Vertrauen in das Gesundheitssystem und der Impfbereitschaft befragt. Zusätzlich wurde psychosozialer Distress anhand des Distress-Thermometers (DT) erhoben. Ergebnisse Über ein Drittel der Krebspatienten (34,2 %, n = 41/120) hatte noch Informationsbedarf hinsichtlich der Auswirkungen des Coronavirus auf ihre Erkrankung oder Behandlung. 17,2 % (n = 21/122) waren von Veränderungen der laufenden oder geplanten Krebstherapie betroffen. Bei n = 42/121 (34,7 %) der Patienten zeigte sich ein erhöhter psychosozialer Distress (DT ≥ 5). Die häufigste Corona-spezifische Belastung war die Angst vor einer Überlastung des Gesundheitssystems (77,9 %, n = 95/122), gefolgt von der Befürchtung, dass sich Angehörige noch größere Sorgen um die betroffenen Patienten machen (56,2 %, n = 68/121). 71,2 % (n = 74/104) der Patienten sind bereit, sich impfen zu lassen; 60 % (n = 18/30) der zum Zeitpunkt der Untersuchung Unentschlossenen oder Ablehner wünschen sich vor einer endgültigen Entscheidung für die Impfung ein Informationsgespräch mit ihrem Onkologen/ihrer Onkologin. Schlussfolgerung Corona-spezifische Belastungen von Krebspatienten betreffen insbesondere den Verlauf der Therapie, aber auch eine mögliche Überlastung des Gesundheitssystems. Onkologische Behandler-Teams sollten Fragen ihrer Patienten Raum geben, mögliche Unsicherheiten anerkennen, emotionale Unterstützung leisten und auf valide Informationsquellen aufmerksam machen.

Vaccination hesitancy is a threat to herd immunity. Healthcare workers (HCWs) play a key role in promoting Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination in the general population. We therefore aimed to provide data on COVID-19 vaccination acceptance/hesitancy among German HCWs. For this exploratory, cross-sectional study, an online survey was conducted in February 2021. The survey included 54 items on demographics; previous vaccination behavior; trust in vaccines, physicians, the pharmaceutical industry and health politics; fear of adverse effects; assumptions regarding the consequences of COVID-19; knowledge about vaccines; and information seeking behavior. Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated and chi-square tests were performed. Four thousand five hundred surveys were analyzed. The overall vaccination acceptance was 91.7%. The age group ≤20 years showed the lowest vaccination acceptance. Factors associated with vaccination hesitancy were lack of trust in authorities and pharmaceutical companies. Attitudes among acquaintances were associated with vaccination hesitancy too. Participants with vaccination hesitancy more often obtained information about COVID-19 vaccines via messenger services or online video platforms and underperformed in the knowledge test. We found high acceptance amongst German HCWs. Several factors associated with vaccination hesitancy were identified which could be targeted in HCW vaccination campaigns.