BACKGROUND:Stent dislodgement is a rare but particularly challenging complication. However, current treatment strategies are suboptimal. OBJECTIVE:This study sought to preliminarily assess the feasibility of a novel self-expanding basket (SEB) catheter to successfully retrieve dislodged stent during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHOD:The novel SEB catheter is designed as a self-expanding basket tip made of superelastic shape nitinol memory alloy, which could automatically expand to tightly wrap and flatten the deformed struts regardless of whether the stent come off the guidewire. Consecutive patients with coronary artery disease who experienced stent dislodgement during PCI were included. The primary outcome was procedure success defined as completely removing the stent without surgical incision of blood vessels, or hemostatic forceps, or injury of access vessels. RESULTS:From May 2020 to May 2023, a total of 6 patients encountering stent dislodgment were enrolled. Five presented as stent dislodgment with the guidewire in situ and the rest one as total stent and guidewire loss. Successful retrieving of dislodged stent with SEB catheter was achieved in 100% (6 of 6) subjects. After retracting lost stent, 5 of 6 patients received new stent implantation, and one only underwent balloon angioplasty with acceptable imaging results. No safety events were observed. CONCLUSIONS:This preliminary report of the novel stent retrieving device presents favorable efficacy and safety profile. Further multicenter study is required to confirm these findings. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER:Not applicable.

Pathological cardiac hypertrophy is the primary cause of heart failure, yet its underlying mechanisms remain incompletely understood. Transmembrane protein 100 (TMEM100) plays a role in various disorders, such as nervous system disease, pain and tumorigenesis, but its function in pathological cardiac hypertrophy is still unknown. In this study, we observed that TMEM100 is upregulated in cardiac hypertrophy. Functional investigations have shown that adeno-associated virus 9 (AAV9) mediated-TMEM100 overexpression mice attenuates transverse aortic constriction (TAC)-induced cardiac hypertrophy, including cardiomyocyte enlargement, cardiac fibrosis, and impaired heart structure and function. We subsequently demonstrated that adenoviral TMEM100 (AdTMEM100) mitigates phenylephrine (PE)-induced cardiomyocyte hypertrophy and downregulates the expression of cardiac hypertrophic markers in vitro, whereas TMEM100 knockdown exacerbates cardiomyocyte hypertrophy. The RNA sequences of the AdTMEM100 group and control group revealed that TMEM100 was involved in oxidative stress and the MAPK signaling pathway after PE stimulation. Mechanistically, we revealed that the transmembrane domain of TMEM100 (amino acids 53-75 and 85-107) directly interacts with the C-terminal region of TAK1 (amino acids 1-300) and inhibits the phosphorylation of TAK1 and its downstream molecules JNK and p38. TAK1-binding-defective TMEM100 failed to inhibit the activation of the TAK1-JNK/p38 pathway. Finally, the application of a TAK1 inhibitor (iTAK1) revealed that TAK1 is necessary for TMEM100-mediated cardiac hypertrophy. In summary, TMEM100 protects against pathological cardiac hypertrophy through the TAK1-JNK/p38 pathway and may serve as a promising target for the treatment of cardiac hypertrophy.

The fundamental pathophysiological mechanism in the progression of chronic heart failure following acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is ventricular remodeling, in which innate and adaptive immunity both play critical roles. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) have been demonstrated to function in a range of pathological conditions, such as infections, inflammation, autoimmune diseases, and tumors. However, it is unclear how MDSCs contribute to cardiac remodeling following AMI. This study aimed to identify the function and underlying mechanism of MDSCs in controlling cardiac remodeling following AMI. Following AMI in mice, MDSCs frequencies changed dynamically, considerably increased on day 7 in blood, spleens, lymph nodes and hearts, and decreased afterwards. Consistently, mice with AMI displayed enhanced cardiac function on day 14 post-AMI, reduced infract size and higher survival rates on day 28 post-AMI following the adoptive transfer of MDSCs. Furthermore, MDSCs inhibited the inflammatory response by decreasing pro-inflammatory cytokine (TNF-α, IL-17, Cxcl-1, and Cxcl-2) expression, up-regulating anti-inflammatory cytokine (TGF-β1, IL-10, IL-4, and IL-13) expression, reducing CD3+ T cell infiltration in the infarcted heart and enhancing M2 macrophage polarization. Mechanistically, MDSCs improved the release of anti-inflammatory factors (TGF-β1 and IL-10) and decreased the injury of LPS-induced cardiomyocytes in vitro in a manner dependent on cell–cell contact. Importantly, blockade of IL-10 partially abolished the cardioprotective role of MDSCs. This study found that MDSCs contributed to the restoration of cardiac function and alleviation of adverse cardiac remodeling after AMI possibly by inhibiting inflammation.

BackgroundData on drug-coated balloons (DCB) for de novo coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO) are limited. We aimed to investigate the long-term outcomes of substitution of drug-eluting stents (DES) by DCB.MethodsWe compared the outcomes of less DES strategy (DCB alone or combined with DES) and DES-only strategy in treating de novo coronary CTO in this prospective, observational, multicenter study. The primary endpoints were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), target vessel revascularization, myocardial infarction, and death during 3-year follow-up. The secondary endpoints were late lumen loss (LLL) and restenosis until 1-year after operation.ResultsOf the 591 eligible patients consecutively enrolled between January 2015 and December 2019, 281 (290 lesions) were treated with DCB (DCB-only or combined with DES) and 310 (319 lesions) with DES only. In the DCB group, 147 (50.7%) lesions were treated using DCB-only, and the bailout stenting rate was relatively low (3.1%). The average stent length per lesion in the DCB group was significantly shorter compared with the DES-only group (21.5 ± 25.5 mm vs. 54.5 ± 26.0 mm, p < 0.001). A total of 112 patients in the DCB group and 71 patients in the DES-only group (38.6% vs. 22.3%, p < 0.001) completed angiographic follow-up until 1-year, and LLL was much less in the DCB group (−0.08 ± 0.65 mm vs. 0.35 ± 0.62 mm, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in restenosis occurrence between the two groups (20.5% vs. 19.7%, p > 0.999). The Kaplan–Meier estimates of MACE at 3-year (11.8% vs. 12.0%, log-rank p = 0.688) was similar between the groups.ConclusionPercutaneous coronary intervention with DCB is a potential “stent-less” therapy for de novo CTO lesions with satisfactory long-term clinical results compared to the DES-only approach.

目的:探讨药物包被球囊(DCB)治疗冠状动脉真性分叉病变的疗效及安全性.方法:回顾性纳入于我院接受介入治疗的真性分叉病变患者,根据手术策略将其分为药物洗脱支架组(DES组,158例)和DCB组(98例).主要观察终点为2年靶病变血运重建,次要观察终点为主要不良心血管事件(包括心源性死亡、靶血管血运重建、靶血管心肌梗死和支架内血栓).结果:DCB组靶病变血运重建和主要不良心血管事件发生率均显著低于DES 组(3.1％vs.11.4％,log-rank P=0.019;5.1％vs.13.9％,log-rank P=0.029).两组均无支架内血栓和靶血管心肌梗死发生.结论:DCB治疗冠状动脉真性分叉病变疗效明确,安全可行.

Background:Coronary artery calcification (CAC) is associated with high rates of restenosis and adverse clinical events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES). Objectives:The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes of drug-coated balloon (DCB)-only treatment for de novo lesions with and without CAC. Methods:Patients with de novo coronary disease treated with the DCB-only strategy were retrospectively enrolled from three centers and categorized into a CAC group and a non-CAC group. The primary endpoint was the target lesion failure (TLF) rate during the 3-year follow-up. Secondary endpoints included the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), target lesion revascularization (TLR), cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI) and any revascularization. Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to assemble a cohort of patients with similar baseline characteristics. Results:A total of 1,263 patients with 1,392 lesions were included, and 243 patients were included in each group after PSM. Compared with the non-CAC group, the incidence rates of TLF (9.52% vs. 4.94%, odds ratio [OR]: 2.080; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.083-3.998, P = 0.034) and TLR (7.41% vs. 2.88%, OR: 2.642; 95% CI: 1.206-5.787, P = 0.020) in the CAC group were higher. The incidence rates of MACE (12.35% vs. 7.82%, OR: 1.665; 95% CI: 0.951-2.916, P = 0.079), cardiac death (2.06% vs. 2.06%, OR: 0.995; 95% CI: 0.288-3.436, P = 0.993), MI (1.23% vs. 0.82%, OR: 2.505; 95% CI: 0.261-8.689, P = 0.652) and any revascularization (12.76% vs. 9.67%, OR: 1.256; 95% CI: 0.747-2.111, P = 0.738) were similar between groups. Conclusions:CAC increased the incidence of TLF and TLR without a substantial increase in the risk of MACE, cardiac death, MI, or any revascularization in patients treated with DCB-only angioplasty during the 3-year follow-up.

目的:比较药物涂层球囊(DCB)与药物洗脱支架(DES)在急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)伴高出血风险(HBR)患者中的安全性和有效性.方法:连续纳入2020年1月至2020年12月期间于郑州大学第一附属医院心内科接受单纯DCB或DES治疗且符合纳入及排除标准的ACS伴HBR患者共239例,分为DCB组(n=73)和DES组(n=166),收集两组患者的基线资料、手术资料并进行随访.研究的主要终点为净临床获益复合终点事件,包括心原性死亡、急性心肌梗死(AMI)、靶血管血运重建(TVR)、出血学术研究联合会(BARC)≥2型出血;次要终点为BARC≥1型出血、BARC≥3型出血和主要不良心血管事件(MACE,包括心原性死亡、AMI和TVR).结果:两组在各基线资料指标方面的差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05).平均随访(20.5±3.9)个月,DCB组净临床获益复合终点事件的发生率(9.6％vs.21.7％,P=0.025)和发生风险(HR=0.44,95％CI:0.23～0.83,log-rank P=0.031)均明显低于DES组.DCB组BARC≥1型出血的发生率显著低于DES组(8.2％vs.22.9％,P=0.009),两组的MACE(6.8％vs.9.0％,P=0.727)和BARC≥3型出血(0％vs.4.8％,P=0.059)发生率差异均无统计学意义.结论:单纯DCB治疗ACS伴HBR患者安全、有效,且与DES相比可显著降低术后出血事件发生风险.

BACKGROUND:Controversy exists as to the optimal treatment approach for ostial left anterior descending (LAD) or ostial left circumflex artery (LCx) lesions. Drug-coated balloons (DCB) may overcome some of the limitations of drug-eluting stents (DES). Therefore, we investigated the security and feasibility of the DCB policy in patients with ostial LAD or ostial LCx lesions, and compared it with the conventional DES-only strategy.METHODS:We retrospectively enrolled patients with de novo ostial lesions in the LAD or LCx who underwent interventional treatment. They were categorized into two groups based on their treatment approach: the DCB group and the DES group. The treatment strategies in the DCB group involved the use of either DCB-only or hybrid strategies, whereas the DES group utilized crossover or precise stenting techniques. Two-year target lesion revascularization was the primary endpoint, while the rates of major adverse cardiovascular events, cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and vessel thrombosis were the secondary endpoints. Using propensity score matching, we assembled a cohort with comparable baseline characteristics. To ensure result analysis reliability, we conducted sensitivity analyses, including interaction, and stratified analyses.RESULTS:Among the 397 eligible patients, 6.25% of patients who were planned to undergo DCB underwent DES. A total of 108 patients in each group had comparable propensity scores and were included in the analysis. Two-year target lesion revascularization occurred in 5 patients (4.90%) and 16 patients (16.33%) in the DCB group and the DES group, respectively (odds ratio = 0.264, 95% CI: 0.093-0.752, P = 0.008). Compared with the DES group, the DCB group demonstrated a lower major adverse cardiovascular events rate (7.84% vs. 19.39%, P = 0.017). However, differences with regard to cardiac death, non-periprocedural target vessel myocardial infarction, and definite or probable vessel thrombosis between the groups were non-significant.CONCLUSIONS:The utilization of the DCB approach signifies an innovative and discretionary strategy for managing isolated ostial lesions in the LAD or LCx. Nevertheless, a future randomized trial investigating the feasibility and safety of DCB compared to the DES-only strategy specifically for de novo ostial lesions in the LAD or LCx is highly warranted.

Heart failure (HF) severely impairs human health because of its high incidence and mortality. Cardiac hypertrophy is the main cause of HF, while its underlying mechanism is not fully clear. As an E3 ubiquitin ligase, Ring finger protein 13 (RNF13) plays a crucial role in many disorders, such as liver immune, neurological disease and tumorigenesis, whereas the function of RNF13 in cardiac hypertrophy remains largely unknown. In the present study, we found that the protein expression of RNF13 is up-regulated in the transverse aortic constriction (TAC)-induced murine hypertrophic hearts and phenylephrine (PE)-induced cardiomyocyte hypertrophy. Functional investigations indicated that RNF13 global knockout mice accelerates the degree of TAC-induced cardiac hypertrophy, including cardiomyocyte enlargement, cardiac fibrosis and heart dysfunction. On the contrary, adeno-associated virus 9 (AAV9) mediated-RNF13 overexpression mice alleviated cardiac hypertrophy. Furthermore, we demonstrated that adenoviral RNF13 attenuates the PE-induced cardiomyocyte hypertrophy and down-regulates the expression of cardiac hypertrophic markers, while the opposite results were observed in the RNF13 knockdown group. The RNA-sequence of RNF13 knockout and wild type mice showed that RNF13 deficiency activates oxidative stress after TAC surgery. In terms of the mechanism, we found that RNF13 directly interacted with p62 and promoted the activation of downstream NRF2/HO-1 signaling. Finally, we proved that p62 knockdown can reverse the effect of RNF13 in cardiac hypertrophy. In conclusion, RNF13 protects against the cardiac hypertrophy via p62-NRF2 axis.

Background Drug-coated balloons (DCB), alone or in combination with drug-eluting stents (DES), may be used to treat diffuse coronary lesions. We aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of DCB in patients with diffuse coronary lesions. Methods Consecutive patients with diffuse coronary lesions (lesion length > 25 mm) who underwent DCB and/or DES between January 2015 and December 2019 were included in this prospective, observational, multicenter study. The DCB group included 355 patients (360 lesions), of which 142 patients (143 lesions, 39.7%) received the DCB-only strategy and 213 patients (217 lesions, 60.3%) received the hybrid strategy (DCB combined with DES). The DES group included 672 patients (831 lesions) treated with DES alone. Target lesion revascularization (TLR) during 3-year follow-up was the primary outcome of interest. The secondary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as a composite of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization. Results The two groups had comparable baseline clinical and lesion characteristics. Lesion length was similar (43.52 ± 16.46 mm vs. 44.87 ± 15.80 mm, P = 0.181), but the stent length in the DCB group was significantly shorter (24.02 ± 23.62 mm vs. 51.89 ± 15.81 mm, P < 0.001). Ten lesions (2.8%) in the DCB group received bailout stents. Over 3 years of follow-up, no significant difference in TLR incidence between the groups (7.3 vs. 8.3%, log-rank P = 0.636) was observed. Incidence of MACE also did not differ significantly (11.3 vs. 13.7%, log-rank P = 0.324). No thrombosis events occurred in the DCB group, while four patients (0.6%) in the DES group experienced stent thrombosis (log-rank P = 0.193). Moreover, similar TLR and MACE rates were observed between DCB-only and hybrid strategies (TLR: 6.4 vs. 8.0%, log-rank P = 0.651; MACE: 11.4 vs. 11.2%, log-rank P = 0.884). Conclusion Long-term outcomes show that the efficacy and safety of the DCB strategy (DCB alone or combined with DES) are similar to those of DES alone in diffuse coronary lesions. These findings suggest that this strategy is a promising alternative for select patients with diffuse coronary lesions.

BACKGROUND Currently, there is no optimal treatment strategy for ostial left anterior descending (LAD) or ostial left circumflex artery (LCx) lesions. This study explored effectiveness and safety of drug-coated balloons (DCB) in individuals presenting with ostial LAD or LCx lesions. METHODS A total of 137 patients with de novo ostial LAD or LCx lesions scheduled for DCB treatment were prospectively recruited into the study. After mandatory lesion preparation, DCB-only or hybrid strategy [DCB + drug-eluting stent (DES)] were performed on 120 patients (87.59%). The primary endpoint was the rate of 2-year target lesion revascularization (TLR). Rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (TVMI), and vessel thrombosis were explored as the secondary outcomes. Quantitative coronary angiography software was used to analyze coronary angiograms. RESULTS Of the participants, 58 were treated with DCB-only and 62 with hybrid strategy. Relative to the DCB-only group, patients in the hybrid group had longer target lesions (15.47 ± 10.08 vs. 36.85 ± 9.46 mm, P<0.001) and higher Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) scores (23.47 ± 5.22 vs. 29.98 ± 3.18, P<0.001). During follow-up (731 ± 64 days), neither the primary endpoint (TLR) nor the secondary endpoints (including MACE, cardiac death, TVMI, and vessel thrombosis) differed statistically between the two groups (all P > 0.05). Treatment strategy (DCB-only or hybrid) was not a significant risk factor for TLR. Patients who underwent DCB-only exhibited less late lumen loss compared with the patients who underwent hybrid strategy (-0.26 ± 0.59 vs. 0.42 ± 0.47 mm, P<0.001) at 1-year angiographic follow-up. CONCLUSIONS With regards to safety and efficacy, the strategy of DCB as a standalone therapy was similar in comparison with the hybrid strategy of DCB + DES for ostial LAD and ostial LCx lesions. This approach might be effective and technically easy in treating ostial LAD and LCx diseases.

AimsAn increasing body of evidence suggests that drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty represents a valuable option for revascularization in selected patients with coronary bifurcation disease. However, there remains a paucity of real-world observational evidence on the efficacy of DCB in left main (LM) true bifurcation lesion. We compared clinical and angiographic outcomes of hybrid [DCB + drug-eluting stent (DES)] versus DES-only strategy (provisional stenting or two-stent strategies) in de novo LM true bifurcated lesions.MethodsThe primary endpoint was the 2-year composite rate of target lesion failure (TLF): cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (TVMI), or clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR). A routine 1-year angiographic follow-up was scheduled. Propensity-score matching was utilized to assemble a cohort of patients with similar baseline characteristics.ResultsAmong 1077 eligible patients, 199 who received DCB treatment and 398 who were assigned to DES therapy had similar propensity scores and were included in the analysis. TLF within 2 years occurred in 13 patients (7.56%) assigned to DCB group, and 52 patients (14.36%) assigned to DES group (odds ratio: 0.487; 95% confidence interval: 0.258–0.922; P = 0.025; Log-rank P = 0.024). Compared with the DES group, the DCB group resulted in a lower rate of CD-TLR (2.91% vs. 9.42%; P = 0.007). Cardiac death, TVMI, all-cause mortality, and stent thrombosis were comparable between both groups. Patients treated with DES-only were associated with a higher late lumen loss (0.42 ± 0.62 mm vs. 0.13 ± 0.42 mm, P < 0.001) compared with the DCB group at 1 year. In sensitivity analysis, the DCB group also presented a lower incidence of TLF, CD-TLR and stent thrombosis both compared to the two-stent strategy and compared to provisional stenting (Ps < 0.05).ConclusionThe 2-year results of PCI utilizing DCB for LM true bifurcation lesions are superior to employing DES alone in terms of safety and effectiveness.

Objective To evaluate the application value of left atrial function in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy（HCM） by four-dimensional automatic left atrial quantitation（4 D Auto LAQ） technology. Methods Forty patients with HCM（20 obstructive cases, 20 non-obstructive cases） and 20 healthy people（control group） who were treated in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from March to December 2021 were selected. The application of 4 D Auto LAQ software was used to obtain the maximum left atrial volume(LAV max ), minimum left atrial volume(LAV min ), left atrial pre-systolic volume（LAVpre）, left atrial volume index（LAVI）, left atrial reserve longitudinal strain（LASr）, left atrial reservoir circumferential strain（LASr-c）, left atrial conduit longitudinal strain（LAScd）, left atrial passage circumferential strain（LAScd-c）, left atrial systolic longitudinal strain（LASct）, left atrial systolic circumferential strain（LASct-c）, left ventricular global longitudinal strain（LVGLS）, left ventricular global circumferential strain（LVGCS）, and the left atrial total emptying fraction（LAtEF）, left atrial passive emptying fraction（LApEF） and left atrial active emptying fraction（LAaEF） were calculated. The differences of parameters in each group were compared. Spearman correlation analysis was used to analyze the correlation between left atrial function and left ventricular function. Receiver operating characteristic（ROC） curve was drawn to compare the accuracy of each 4 D Auto LAQ parameter in the diagnosis of left atrial dysfunction in HCM patients. The intra-observer and inter-observer repeatability test of 4 D Auto LAQ parameters was performed. Results Compared with the control group, LAV max , LAV min , LAVpre and LAVI in the obstructive HCM group and the non-obstructive HCM group were increased, and LASr, LASr-C, LAScd-C, LASct, LAtEF, LApEF and LVGLS were decreased（P＜0.05）. Compared with the non-obstructive HCM group, LAV max , LAV min , LAVpre, LAVI were increased, LAScd was decreased in the obstructive HCM group（P＜0.05）. Spearman correlation analysis showed that there was a strong correlation between LASr and LVGLS in the obstructive HCM group and the non-obstructive HCM group（r=0.710, 0.717, P＜0.01）. LAScd was moderately correlated with LAVI（r=-0.595,-0.522, P＜0.05）. ROC curve analysis showed that the largest area under the 4 D Auto LAQ parameter curve was LASr. Conclusion 4 D Auto LAQ technology can evaluate left atrial function in patients with HCM, which can early detect left atrial remodeling and function impairment, and it is closely related to left ventricular remodeling, and provide reference indicators for the prognosis and risk stratification of HCM patients.

Although drug-eluting stents are the most common interventional devices for patients with coronary disease, drug-coated balloons (DCBs) represent a novel therapeutic alternative in certain scenarios. This prospective, observational all-comers study explored the clinical outcomes of DCB use in patients with coronary lesions. All patients treated with DCBs were enrolled in this study, including patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR) or de novo lesions. The primary outcome was the target lesion revascularization (TLR) rate at one year. We enrolled 2306 patients with 2660 lesions and performed DCB angioplasty in 399 patients (17.3%) with ISR and 1907 patients (82.7%) with de novo lesions. During follow-up (366 ± 46 days), the TLR rate was lower in the de novo lesion group (1.31%) compared to the ISR group (7.02%) [odds ratio (OR) 0.176, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.101–0.305, p < 0.001]. Patients with de novo lesions had a lower yearly incidence of MACE compared to ISR patients (2.73 vs. 9.27%, respectively, OR 0.274, 95% CI 0.177–0.424, p < 0.001) and a lower incidence of any revascularization (5.09 vs. 13.03%, OR 0.358, 95% CI 0.251–0.510, p < 0.001). No significant differences between groups were observed in the rates of cardiac death (OR 0.783, 95% CI 0.258–2.371, p = 0.655) or MI (OR 0.696, 95% CI 0.191–2.540, p = 0.573). DCB angioplasty in this all-comers, real-world, prospective study was safe and efficient with low TLR and MACE rates. Thus, DCB appears to be an attractive alternative for the stent-less treatment of de novo coronary lesions. ISR in-stent restenosis; OR odds ratio; CI confidence interval; TLR target lesion revascularization; MACE major adverse cardiovascular events; MI myocardial infraction. MACE defined as the composite outcome of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization. Any revascularization includes any percutaneous coronary intervention, and coronary artery bypass grafting.

Background. Diabetes is an independent risk factor for coronary artery disease and portends adverse prognosis in diabetic patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared to nondiabetic patients. Few studies are currently available regarding the relationship between diabetes duration and major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) post-PCI. This study is aimed at assessing the association between diabetes duration and major adverse cardiac events after PCI. Methods. A total of 302 cases of diabetic patients undergoing an elective PCI with drug-eluting stent (DES) deployment and or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) using a drug-coated balloon (DCB) were prospectively studied. We divided patients into three groups based on diabetes duration: <5 years group ( n = 165 ), 5–10 years’ group ( n = 72 ), and ≥10 years’ group ( n = 65 ). Angiographic and clinical follow-up were conducted 12 months after the procedures for all the patients and at any given time during the study when needed. Results. A significantly higher rate of myocardial infarction (MI) in diabetic patients with the longest diabetes duration (7.7% vs. 0% and 0.6%, P = 0.001 ) was observed compared with groups of shorter duration. Repeat coronary revascularization was found to be significantly higher in the >10-year group than was it in groups with shorter duration of diabetes (23.1% vs. 19.4% and 9.10%, P = 0.03 ). After adjustment for confounding risk factors, longer diabetes duration remained an independent predictor of MI (hazard ratio (HR): 5.525, confidence interval (CI): 1.273-23.978, P = 0.022 ) and repeat revascularization (HR: 1.608, CI: 1.058-2.443, P = 0.026 ). Repeat revascularization was significantly related to the progression of nontreated lesions (De novo lesions 20% vs. 18% and 7.3%, P = 0.009 ) compared to previously treated lesions (target lesion revascularization (TLR) 3% vs. 1.3% and 2%, P = 0.774 ). However, all-cause mortality was not significantly different among the groups (3.1% vs. 5.6% and 0.6%, P = 0.06 , HR: 2.403, CI: 0.464-12.436, P = 0.293 ). Conclusion. Diabetes duration was associated with significant differences in major adverse cardiac events after the percutaneous coronary intervention; the longest diabetes duration portended higher rates of MACEs than shorter duration at the 12-month follow-up.

目的 评估沙库巴曲缬沙坦治疗急性心肌梗死后心力衰竭的效果.方法 回顾性纳入2018年6月至2019年6月郑州大学第一附属医院心内科因急性心肌梗死住院且出现射血分数降低的心衰(HFrEF)或射血分数中间范围型心衰(HFmrEF)的173例患者,根据用药情况分为ARNI组(55例)和ACEI/ARB组(118例).主要观察指标为两组服药1 a后血浆氨基末端脑钠肽前体(NT-proBNP)水平、左室射血分数(LVEF)、左心室舒张末期内径(LVEDD),次要观察指标为因心衰再入院、心源性死亡及全因死亡发生率,安全性指标包括再发心肌梗死、症状性低血压、肾功能恶化、高钾血症、血管神经性水肿等.结果 两组患者一般资料差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).服药1 a时,ARNI组有29.1％(16/55)的患者LVEDD缩小≥10 mm,ACEI/ARB组为10.2％(12/118),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).ARNI组LVEF增高≥5％的患者占50.9％(28/55),ACEI/ARB组为33.9％(40/118),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).ARNI组中因心衰再入院的患者占30.9％(17/55),ACEI/ARB组为47.5％(56/118),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).ARNI组有2例患者死亡,ACEI/ARB组有3例死亡,两组死亡率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).两组患者再发心肌梗死、症状性低血压、高钾血症、血管神经性水肿及肾功能恶化者占比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 对于急性心肌梗死后HFrEF和HFmrEF的患者,在血流动力学稳定的情况下,应用沙库巴曲缬沙坦比ACEI/ARB在改善心室重构和减少因心衰再入院方面更有优势.

Pathological myocardial hypertrophy is regulated by multiple pathways. However, its underlying pathogenesis has not been fully explored. The goal of this work was to elucidate the function of polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 4 (GALNT4) in myocardial hypertrophy and its underlying mechanism of action. We illustrated that GALNT4 was upregulated in the models of hypertrophy. Two cardiac hypertrophy models were established through partial transection of the aorta in GALNT4-knockout (GALNT4-KO) mice and adeno-associated virus 9-GALNT4 (AAV9-GALNT4) mice. The GALNT4-KO mice demonstrated accelerated cardiac hypertrophy, dysfunction, and fibrosis, whereas the opposite phenotype was observed in AAV9-GALNT4 mice. Similarly, GALNT4 overexpression mitigated the degree of phenylephrine-induced cardiomyocyte hypertrophy in vitro whereas GALNT4 knockdown aggravated the hypertrophy. In terms of mechanism, GALNT4 deficiency increased the phosphorylation and activation of ASK1 and its downstream targets (JNK and p38), whereas GALNT4 overexpression inhibited activation of the ASK1 pathway. Furthermore, we demonstrated that GALNT4 can directly bind to ASK1 inhibiting its N-terminally mediated dimerization and the subsequent phosphorylation of ASK1. Finally, an ASK1 inhibitor (iASK1) was able to reverse the effects of GALNT4 in vitro. In summary, GALNT4 may serve as a new regulatory factor and therapeutic target by blocking the activation of the ASK1 signaling cascade.

Background. Relative to nondiabetic patients, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with inferior clinical outcomes. We aimed to evaluate the outcomes of drug-coated balloon (DCB) in diabetic versus nondiabetic patients. Methods and Results. In this observational, prospective, multicenter study, we compared the outcomes of patients with and without DM after undergoing PCI with DCBs. Target lesion failure (TLF) was analyzed as primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints were the rates of target lesion revascularization (TLR), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), and any revascularization. Propensity score matching was used to assemble a cohort of patients with similar baseline characteristics. Among 2,306 eligible patients, 578 with DM and 578 without DM had similar propensity scores and were included in the analyses. During follow-up (366±46 days), compared with DM patients, patients without DM were associated with a lower yearly incidence of TLF (2.77% vs. 5.36%; OR, 1.991; 95% CI, 1.077 to 3.681; P=0.025) and TLR (1.90% vs. 4.15%; OR, 2.233; 95% CI, 1.083 to 4.602; P=0.026). No significant differences were observed with regards to rates of MACE (OR: 1.580, 95% CI: 0.912-2.735; P=0.100), cardiac death (OR: 1.608, 95% CI: 0.523-4.946; P=0.403), MI (OR: 4.042, 95% CI: 0.855-19.117; P=0.057), and any revascularization (OR: 1.534, 95% CI: 0.983-2.393; P=0.058). Conclusions. Diabetic patients experience higher TLF and TLR rates following DCB angioplasty without substantial increase in the risk of MACE, cardiac death, MI, or revascularization.

Background. The revascularization of small vessels using drug-eluting stents remains challenging. The use of the drug-coated balloon is an attractive therapeutic strategy in de novo lesions in small coronary vessels, particularly in the diabetic group. This study aimed to assess the outcomes of DCB-only angioplasty in small vessel disease. Methods. A total of 1198 patients with small vessel disease treated with DCB-only strategy were followed. Patients were divided into the diabetic and nondiabetic groups. Clinical and angiographical follow-up were organized at 12 months. The primary endpoints were target lesion failure and secondary major adverse cardiac events. Results. There was a significantly higher rate of target lesion failure among diabetic patients compared to nondiabetic [17 (3.9%) vs. 11 (1.4%), P = 0.006 ], taken separately, the rate of target lesion revascularization significantly differed between groups with a higher rate observed in the diabetic group [9 (2%) vs. 4 (0.5%), P = 0.014 ]. Diabetes mellitus remained an independent predictor for TLF (HR: 2.712, CI: 1.254–5.864, P = 0.011 ) and target lesion revascularization (HR: 3.698, CI: 1.112–12.298, P = 0.033 ) after adjustment. However, no significant differences were observed between groups regarding the target vessel myocardial infarction (0.6% vs. 0.1%, P = 0.110 ) and MACE [19 (4.4%) vs. 21 (2.7%), P = 0.120 ]. Conclusion. Drug-coated balloon-only treatment achieved lower incidence rates of TLF and MACE. Diabetes is an independent predictor for target lesion failure and target lesion revascularization at one year following DCB treatment in small coronary vessels. We observed no significant differences between groups regarding MACE in one year.