BACKGROUND Long-term abdominal drains (LTAD) are a cost-effective palliative measure to manage malignant ascites in the community, but their use in patients with end-stage chronic liver disease and refractory ascites is not routine practice. The safety and cost-effectiveness of LTAD are currently being studied in this setting, with preliminary positive results. We hypothesised that palliative LTAD are as effective and safe as repeat palliative large volume paracentesis (LVP) in patients with cirrhosis and refractory ascites and may offer advantages in patients’ quality of life. AIM To compare the effectiveness and safety of palliative LTAD and LVP in refractory ascites secondary to end-stage chronic liver disease. METHODS A retrospective, observational cohort study comparing the effectiveness and safety outcomes of palliative LTAD and regular palliative LVP as a treatment for refractory ascites in consecutive patients with end-stage chronic liver disease followed-up at our United Kingdom tertiary centre between 2018 and 2022 was conducted. Fisher’s exact tests and the Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare qualitative and quantitative variables, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were generated to stratify time-related outcomes according to the type of drain. RESULTS Thirty patients had a total of 35 indwelling abdominal drains and nineteen patients underwent regular LVP. The baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. Prophylactic antibiotics were more frequently prescribed in patients with LTAD (P = 0.012), while the incidence of peritonitis did not differ between the two groups (P = 0.46). The incidence of acute kidney injury (P = 0.014) and ascites/drain-related hospital admissions (P = 0.004) were significantly higher in the LVP group. The overall survival was similar in the two groups (log-rank P = 0.26), but the endpoint-free survival was significantly shorter in the LVP group (P = 0.003, P < 0.001, P = 0.018 for first ascites/drain-related admission, acute kidney injury and drain-related complications, respectively). CONCLUSION The use of LTAD in the management of refractory ascites in palliated end-stage liver disease is effective, safe, and may reduce hospital admissions and utilisation of healthcare resources compared to LVP.

Background: To determine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the population with chronic Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection under hospital follow-up in the UK, we quantified the coverage and frequency of measurements of biomarkers used for routine surveillance (alanine transferase [ALT] and HBV viral load). Methods: We used anonymized electronic health record data from the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Informatics Collaborative (HIC) pipeline representing five UK National Health Service (NHS) Trusts. Results: We report significant reductions in surveillance of both biomarkers during the pandemic compared to pre-COVID-19 years, both in terms of the proportion of patients who had ≥1 measurement annually, and the mean number of measurements per patient. Conclusions: These results demonstrate the real-time utility of HIC data in monitoring health-care provision, and support interventions to provide catch-up services to minimise the impact of the pandemic. Further investigation is required to determine whether these disruptions will be associated with increased rates of adverse chronic HBV outcomes.

ABSTRACTHepatitis B Virus (HBV) genome sequencing can be used to provide more complete genetic information at the population and individual level to shed light on the limitations of current interventions, and inform new strategies for elimination. HBV sequencing is challenging due to the partially dsDNA genome, high diversity, low viral loads and presence of large amounts of host genetic material in clinical samples. Here we describe the design and use of a pan-genotypic panel of 74 HBV specific capture-probes and nuclease treatment in improving sequencing efficiency. We processed 20 plasma samples (viral loads 1.98 to 4.07 log10, genotypes A-E) and three positive controls (human total brain RNA and bacteriophage lambda DNA) in triplicate to compare DNAse vs. RNAse vs. no nuclease treatment. We prepared libraries using the Takara Bio SMARTer Stranded Total RNA-Seq Kit v3, split the library in two, enriching half with the custom-designed probe panel and xGen Hybridization and Wash Kit (IDT), the other half was not enriched. Both libraries were sequenced on the NovaSeq6000 platform with 2×150nt paired-end reads. Capture resulted in a 47,970 fold increase in the number of reads mapped to the HBV genome in the “no nuclease” arm (243 HBV reads per million reads sequenced in the capture pool vs. 5×10−3reads per million in the no-capture pool). Out of 20 samples, only 1 without capture generated HBV reads (viral load 3.89 log10IU/ml) vs. 19 samples with capture. HBV sequence yield was increased in the capture arm and resulted in 2.30 log10(95% confidence interval 1.99 - 2.48 log10) increase in HBV reads (per million reads sequenced) per log10increase in viral load. The proportion of HBV reads increased a median of 12 fold with RNAse treatment. We developed a targeted pan-genotypic sequencing method using a custom panel of biotinylated oligos that increases the sequencing efficacy of HBV. This method will allow us to gain a better insight into HBV diversity.

Purpose The National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Informatics Collaborative (HIC) was established to enable re-use of routinely collected clinical data across National Health Service (NHS) Trusts in the United Kingdom to support translational research. Viral hepatitis is one of the first five exemplar themes and hepatitis B virus (HBV) is the current focus of the theme. The NIHR HIC HBV dataset, derived from the central data repository of NIHR HIC viral hepatitis theme, aims to describe and characterise HBV infection in secondary care in the United Kingdom, and provides a resource for translational research. Participants The dataset comprises >5000 individuals (99% adults aged ≥18, 1% children aged <18) with chronic HBV (CHB) infection from five NHS Trusts across England, representing clinical data collected between August 1994 and August 2021. Findings to date Data on demographics, laboratory tests, antiviral treatment, elastography scores, imaging/biopsy reports, death information, and potential risk factors for liver disease have been collected. Data are captured by electronic patient record (EPR) systems, and records are updated prospectively as new results are added. This cohort profile describes the dataset in its current form. Among the adults, 55% are male, and the median age at index date (defined as the first recorded positive hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) or HBV DNA in EPR systems) was 40 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 32-50). For those individuals with ethnicity reported, 30% were Asian, 24% were Black, 30% were White, and the remaining 16% were mixed or other ethnic groups. Currently, the median follow-up duration of the adult patients in this dataset was 5.0 (IQR: 2.7-7.5) years, with 9.3 (95% CI: 8.2-10.5) deaths per 1,000 person-years. We have already conducted several analyses using subsets of this dataset including an evaluation of distribution and trajectories of HBsAg and HBV viral load in CHB, reviewing the use of antiviral treatment, quantifying the burden of liver disease in the untreated population, and studying the use of laboratory biomarkers to improve stratification and surveillance. Future plans Longitudinal data collection is continuing, with the sample growing in size, more parameters being collected, average follow-up increasing, and more NHS Trusts participating. This dataset offers important opportunities for epidemiological studies and biomedical informatics research, as well as characterising an HBV population for clinical trials through external collaborations with industry.

Background To determine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the population with chronic Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection under hospital follow-up in the UK, we quantified the coverage and frequency of measurements of biomarkers used for routine surveillance (alanine transferase [ALT] and HBV viral load). Methods We used anonymized electronic health record data from the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Informatics Collaborative (HIC) pipeline representing five UK National Health Service (NHS) Trusts. Results We report significant reductions in surveillance of both biomarkers during the pandemic compared to pre-COVID-19 years, both in terms of the proportion of patients who had ≥1 measurement annually, and the mean number of measurements per patient. Conclusions These results demonstrate the real-time utility of HIC data in monitoring health-care provision, and support interventions to provide catch-up services to minimise the impact of the pandemic. Further investigation is required to determine whether these disruptions will be associated with increased rates of adverse chronic HBV outcomes.

Background The CC genotype of the IFNL4 gene is known to be associated with increased Hepatitis C (HCV) cure rates with interferon-based therapy and may contribute to cure with direct acting antivirals. The Genedrive® IFNL4 is a CE marked Point of Care (PoC) molecular diagnostic test, designed for in vitro diagnostic use to provide rapid, real-time detection of IFNL4 genotype status for SNP rs12979860. Methods 120 Participants were consented to a substudy comparing IFNL4 genotyping results from a buccal swab analysed on the Genedrive® platform with results generated using the Affymetix UK Biobank array considered to be the gold standard. Results Buccal swabs were taken from 120 participants for PoC IFNL4 testing and a whole blood sample for genetic sequencing. Whole blood genotyping vs. buccal swab PoC testing identified 40 (33%), 65 (54%), and 15 (13%) had CC, CT and TT IFNL4 genotype respectively. The Buccal swab PoC identified 38 (32%) CC, 64 (53%) CT and 18 (15%) TT IFNL4 genotype respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the buccal swab test to detect CC vs non-CC was 90% (95% CI 76–97%) and 98% (95% CI 91–100%) respectively. Conclusions The buccal swab test was better at correctly identifying non-CC genotypes than CC genotypes. The high specificity of the Genedrive® assay prevents CT/TT genotypes being mistaken for CC, and could avoid patients being identified as potentially ‘good responders’ to interferon-based therapy.

concept study of patients with compensated cirrhosis due to PSC, escalating doses of CILO over 12 weeks were well tolerated and improved markers of cholestasis and liver biochemistry.

the intrahepatic sum of relative severity of dilatations (SumRelSevDilat).Patients were classified into high or low risk group for disease progression using ALP cut-off 1.5x upper limit normal (ULN) and the presence of DS.Results: Eighty patients (68% male) with median age 42 years (range: 18-76) and median PSC duration 8 years (range: 1-25) completed both questionnaires.Median ALP was 150 IU/ml (range: 48-1180).DS was reported in 25 (31%) patients.Maximum IHBD was ≤3 mm in 26 (33%), 4 mm in 19 (23%) and ≥5 mm in 35 (44%) patients.Median MRCP+-derived SumRelSevDilat was 7.0m -1 (range: 0.0-19.8).The mean score for each health domain is shown in Figure 1 below.DS correlated with SF-36 bodily pain (rho -0.28, p = 0.02).Maximum IHBD correlated with PSC-PRO physical function domain (rho 0.36, p < 0.01).SumRelSevDilat correlated with physical functioning (rho -0.25, p = 0.04) and bodily pain (rho -0.26, p = 0.03) domains of SF-36, and the physical function (rho 0.26, p = 0.03) and activities of daily living (rho 0.29, p = 0.01) domains of PSC-PRO.ALP correlated with bodily pain (rho -0.37, p < 0.01), general health (rho -0.26, p = 0.03), and energy/fatigue (rho -0.29, p = 0.01) domains of SF-36, and the physical function (rho 0.30, p < 0.01) and emotional impact (rho 0.38, p < 0.01) domains of PSC-PRO.Bodily pain score was lower in those with DS compared to those without (74% vs 87%, p = 0.02).Both physical functioning (80% vs 92%, p = 0.04) and bodily pain (78% vs 85%, p = 0.03) scores were lower in patients with ALP greater than 1.5x ULN. Conclusion:The presence of DS, severity of intrahepatic biliary dilatations, and ALp >1.5x ULN have a significant impact on both physical and mental health of patients with large-duct PSC.

Introduction Mean iron-corrected T1 (cT1) from multi-parametric liver MRI correlates well with histologically-assessed liver fibrosis and inflammation. One of the features of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a characteristic ‘onion skin’ periductal fibrosis usually seen on histology. We evaluated whether a corresponding feature can be diagnosed macroscopically from quantitative MRI scans. Methods 3D MRCP and axial liver T1 and T2* maps were acquired for patients with large-duct PSC and healthy volunteers. LiverMultiScan (Perspectum Diagnostics (PD), UK) was first used to generate four axial liver parenchyma maps with cT1 measurements at each voxel. Then, biliary data was analysed using MRCP+ (PD, UK) to build a parametric biliary tree model, and the two images were aligned as illustrated in figure 1. Periductal cT1 was quantified over fixed radial distances surrounding the bile ducts at 1 mm increments up to 10 mm. Region of interest (ROI) 1 was defined as the ring-shaped area between the circles with radius 2 and 5 mm. ROI 2 was the area between circles with radius 6 and 9 mm. Mean cT1 was measured in each ROI and compared to the mean cT1 for the whole axial segment (reference), using the Friedman test with Dunn’s correction. Advanced fibrosis (≥F3) was defined as liver stiffness measurement (LSM; FibroScan (Echosens, France)) >9.6 kPa. Results Seventy patients with PSC (67% male, median age 44 years, range: 18–76 and disease duration 7 years, range: 1–25) were recruited, as were 20 healthy volunteers matched for gender. There was a difference in mean cT1 over the three regions (p<0.0001) in PSC, but no such difference was seen in healthy volunteers. Pairwise comparisons in PSC showed mean cT1 in ROI 1 (784 ms) was higher than ROI 2 (768 ms; p<0.0001) and reference (770 ms; p<0.0001), but there was no difference between ROI 2 and reference (p=0.13). Importantly, the mean cT1 in ROI 1 was higher in PSC with advanced fibrosis on LSM (817 vs 771 ms, p=0.0035). A cut-off of 774 ms had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.73 (95% CI 0.59–0.87, p=0.0040) to identify advanced fibrosis. Conclusions Periductal cT1 in the ring of tissue 2–5 mm around the bile ducts is significantly higher than regions further from the bile ducts in PSC and may represent a macroscopic finding that correlates to the histologic ‘onion skin’ fibrosis. This demonstrates how quantitative MRI techniques can be used to assess features of disease that were previously seen only at histology.

Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) has identified the need for a better understanding of which patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) can be cured with ultrashort course HCV therapy. Methods: A total of 202 individuals with chronic HCV were randomised to fixed-duration shortened therapy (8 weeks) vs variable-duration ultrashort strategies (VUS1/2). Participants not cured following first-line treatment were retreated with 12 weeks’ sofosbuvir/ledipasvir/ribavirin. The primary outcome was sustained virological response 12 weeks (SVR12) after first-line treatment and retreatment. Participants were factorially randomised to receive ribavirin with first-line treatment. Results: All evaluable participants achieved SVR12 overall (197/197, 100% [95% CI 98-100]) demonstrating non-inferiority between fixed-duration and variable-duration strategies (difference 0% [95% CI -3.8%, +3.7%], 4% pre-specified non-inferiority margin). First-line SVR12 was 91% [86%-97%] (92/101) for fixed-duration vs 48% [39%-57%] (47/98) for variable-duration, but was significantly higher for VUS2 (72% [56%-87%] (23/32)) than VUS1 (36% [25%-48%] (24/66)). Overall, first-line SVR12 was 72% [65%-78%] (70/101) without ribavirin and 68% [61%-76%] (69/98) with ribavirin (p=0.48). At treatment failure, the emergence of viral resistance was lower with ribavirin (12% [2%-30%] (3/26)) than without (38% [21%-58%] (11/29), p=0.01). Conclusions: Unsuccessful first-line short-course therapy did not compromise retreatment with sofosbuvir/ledipasvir/ribavirin (100% SVR12). SVR12 rates were significantly increased when ultrashort treatment varied between 4-7 weeks rather than 4-6 weeks. Ribavirin significantly reduced resistance emergence in those failing first-line therapy. ISRCTN Registration: 37915093 (11/04/2016).

Magnetic resonance imaging with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRI‐MRCP) in primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is currently based on qualitative assessment and has high interobserver variability. We investigated the utility and performance of quantitative metrics derived from a three‐dimensional biliary analysis tool in adult patients with PSC. MRI‐MRCP, blood‐based biomarkers, and FibroScan were prospectively performed in 80 participants with large‐duct PSC and 20 healthy participants. Quantitative analysis was performed using MRCP+ (Perspectum Ltd., United Kingdom), and qualitative reads were performed by radiologists. Inter‐reader agreements were compared. Patients were classified into high risk or low risk for disease progression, using Mayo risk score (MRS), Amsterdam‐Oxford model (AOM), upper limit of normal (ULN) alkaline phosphatase (ALP), disease distribution, and presence of dominant stricture. Performance of noninvasive tools was assessed using binomial logistic regressions and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses. Quantitative biliary metrics performed well to distinguish abnormal from normal bile ducts (P < 0.0001). Interobserver agreements for MRCP+ dilatation metrics (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.90‐0.96) were superior to modified Amsterdam intrahepatic stricture severity score (κ = 0.74) and Anali score (κ = 0.38). MRCP+ intrahepatic dilatation severity showed excellent performance to classify patients into high‐risk and low‐risk groups, using predictors of disease severity as the reference (MRS, P < 0.0001; AOM, P = 0.0017; 2.2 × ULN ALP, P = 0.0007; 1.5 × ULN ALP, P = 0.0225; extrahepatic disease, P = 0.0331; dominant stricture, P = 0.0019). MRCP+ intrahepatic dilatation severity was an independent predictor of MRS >0 (odds ratio, 31.3; P = 0.035) in the multivariate analysis. Conclusion: Intrahepatic biliary dilatation severity calculated using MRCP+ is elevated in patients with high‐risk PSC and may be used as an adjunct for risk stratification in PSC. This exploratory study has provided the groundwork for examining the utility of novel quantitative biliary metrics in multicenter studies.

Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) has identified the need for a better understanding of which patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) can be cured with ultrashort course HCV therapy. Methods: A total of 202 individuals with chronic HCV were randomised to fixed-duration shortened therapy (8 weeks) vs variable-duration ultrashort strategies (VUS1/2). Participants not cured following first-line treatment were retreated with 12 weeks’ sofosbuvir/ledipasvir/ribavirin. The primary outcome was sustained virological response 12 weeks (SVR12) after first-line treatment and retreatment. Participants were factorially randomised to receive ribavirin with first-line treatment. Results: All evaluable participants achieved SVR12 overall (197/197, 100% [95% CI 98-100]) demonstrating non-inferiority between fixed-duration and variable-duration strategies (difference 0% [95% CI -3.8%, +3.7%], 4% pre-specified non-inferiority margin). First-line SVR12 was 91% [86%-97%] (92/101) for fixed-duration vs 48% [39%-57%] (47/98) for variable-duration, but was significantly higher for VUS2 (72% [56%-87%] (23/32)) than VUS1 (36% [25%-48%] (24/66)). Overall, first-line SVR12 was 72% [65%-78%] (70/101) without ribavirin and 68% [61%-76%] (69/98) with ribavirin (p=0.48). At treatment failure, the emergence of viral resistance was lower with ribavirin (12% [2%-30%] (3/26)) than without (38% [21%-58%] (11/29), p=0.01). Conclusions: Unsuccessful first-line short-course therapy did not compromise retreatment with sofosbuvir/ledipasvir/ribavirin (100% SVR12). SVR12 rates were significantly increased when ultrashort treatment varied between 4-7 weeks rather than 4-6 weeks. Ribavirin significantly reduced resistance emergence in those failing first-line therapy. ISRCTN Registration: 37915093 (11/04/2016).

BackgroundThe WHO has identified the need for a better understanding of which patients can be cured with ultrashort course hepatitis C (HCV) therapyMethods202 individuals with chronic HCV were randomised to fixed-duration shortened therapy (8 weeks) vs variable-duration ultrashort strategies (VUS1/2). Participants not cured following first-line treatment were retreated with 12 weeks’ sofosbuvir/ledipasvir/ribavirin. Primary outcome was sustained virological response 12 weeks (SVR12) after first-line treatment and retreatment. Participants were factorially randomised to receive ribavirin with first-line treatment.ResultsAll evaluable participants achieved SVR12 overall (197/197, 100%[95%CI 98-100]) demonstrating non-inferiority between fixed-duration and variable-duration strategies (difference 0% [95%CI −3.8%,+3.7%], 4% pre-specified non-inferiority margin). First-line SVR12 was 91%[86%-97%] (92/101) for fixed-duration vs 48%[39%-57%] (47/98) for variable-duration, but was significantly higher for VUS2 (72% [56%-87%] (23/32)) than VUS1 (36% [25%-48%] (24/66)). Overall first-line SVR12 was 72%[65%-78%] (70/101) without ribavirin and 68%[61%-76%] (69/98) with ribavirin (p=0.48). At treatment failure, the emergence of viral resistance was lower with ribavirin (12% [2%-30%] (3/26)) than without (38% [21%-58%] (11/29), p=0.01).ConclusionsUnsuccessful first-line short-course therapy did not compromise retreatment with sofosbuvir/ledipasvir/ribavirin (100% SVR12). SVR12 rates were significantly increased when ultrashort treatment varied between 4-7 weeks rather than 4-6 weeks. Ribavirin significantly reduced resistance emergence in those failing first-line therapy.RegistrationISRCTN 37915093.FundingNational Institutes of Health Research.

Deep sequencing of the full-length hepatitis B virus (HBV) genome provides the opportunity to determine the extent to which viral diversity, genotype, polymorphisms, insertions and deletions may influence presentation and outcomes of disease. Increasing experience with analysis of HBV genomic data opens up the potential for using these data to inform insights into pathophysiology of infection and to underpin decision making in clinical practice. We here set out to undertake whole genome HBV sequencing from an adult who presented acutely unwell with a new diagnosis of HBV infection, and tested positive for both HBV anti-core IgM and IgG, possibly representing either acute hepatitis B infection (AHB) or chronic hepatitis B with an acute reactivation (CHB-AR). The distinction between these two scenarios may be important in predicting prognosis and underpinning treatment decisions, but can be challenging based on routine laboratory tests. Through application of deep whole-genome sequencing we typed the isolate as genotype-D1, and identified several minority variants including G1764A and G1986A substitutions in the pre-core promoter and pre-core regions, which support CHB-AR rather than AHB. In the longer term, enhanced deep sequencing data for HBV may provide improved evidence to distinguish between acute and chronic infection, to predict outcomes and to stratify treatment.

Background Current clinical guidelines recommend treating chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in a minority of cases, but there are relatively scarce data on evolution or progression of liver inflammation and fibrosis in cases of chronic HBV (CHB) that do not meet treatment criteria. We aimed to assess the impact of TDF on liver disease, and the risk of renal impairment in treated CHB patients in comparison to untreated patients. Methods We studied a longitudinal ethnically diverse CHB cohort in the UK attending out-patient clinics between 2005 and 2018. We examined TDF treatment (vs. untreated) as the main exposure, with HBV DNA viral load (VL), ALT, elastography scores and eGFR as the main outcomes, using paired tests and mixed effects model for longitudinal measurements. Additionally, decline of eGFR during follow-up was quantified within individuals by thresholds based on clinical guidelines. Baseline was defined as treatment initiation for TDF group and the beginning of clinical follow-up for untreated group respectively. Results We included 206 adults (60 on TDF, 146 untreated), with a median ± IQR follow-up duration of 3.3 ± 2.8 years. The TDF group was significantly older (median age 39 vs. 35 years, p = 0.004) and more likely to be male (63% vs. 47%, p = 0.04) compared to the untreated group. Baseline difference between TDF and untreated groups reflected treatment eligibility criteria. As expected, VL and ALT declined significantly over time in TDF-treated patients. Elastography scores normalised during treatment in the TDF group reflecting regression of inflammation and/or fibrosis. However, 6/81 (7.4%) of untreated patients had a progression of fibrosis stage from F0-F1 to F2 or F3. There was no evidence of difference in rates or incidence of renal impairment during follow-up in the TDF vs. untreated group. Conclusions Risk of liver inflammation and fibrosis may be raised in untreated patients compared to those receiving TDF, and TDF may benefit a larger percentage of the CHB population.

Background: High cure rates with licensed durations of therapy for chronic hepatitis C virus suggest that many patients are overtreated. New strategies in individuals who find it challenging to adhere to standard treatment courses could significantly contribute to the elimination agenda. Objectives: To compare cure rates using variable ultrashort first-line treatment stratified by baseline viral load followed by retreatment, with a fixed 8-week first-line treatment with retreatment with or without adjunctive ribavirin. Design: An open-label, multicentre, factorial randomised controlled trial. Randomisation: Randomisation was computer generated, with patients allocated in a 1 : 1 ratio using a factorial design to each of biomarker-stratified variable ultrashort strategy or fixed duration and adjunctive ribavirin (or not), using a minimisation algorithm with a probabilistic element. Setting: NHS. Participants: A total of 202 adults (aged ≥ 18 years) infected with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1a/1b or 4 for ≥ 6 months, with a detectable plasma hepatitis C viral load and no significant fibrosis [FibroScan® (Echosens, Paris, France) score F0–F1 or biopsy-proven minimal fibrosis], a hepatitis C virus viral load < 10,000,000 IU/ml, no previous exposure to direct-acting antiviral therapy for this infection and not pregnant. Patients co-infected with human immunodeficiency virus were eligible if human immunodeficiency virus viral load had been < 50 copies/ml for > 24 weeks on anti-human immunodeficiency virus drugs. Interventions: Fixed-duration 8-week first-line therapy compared with variable ultrashort first-line therapy, initially for 4–6 weeks (continuous scale) stratified by screening viral load (variable ultrashort strategy 1, mean 32 days of treatment) and then, subsequently, for 4–7 weeks (variable ultrashort strategy 2 mean 39 days of duration), predominantly with ombitasvir, paritaprevir, ritonavir (Viekirax®; AbbVie, Chicago, IL, USA), and dasabuvir (Exviera®; AbbVie, Chicago, IL, USA) or ritonavir. All patients in whom first-line treatment was unsuccessful were immediately retreated with 12 weeks’ sofosbuvir, ledipasvir (Harvoni®, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Foster City, CA, USA) and ribavirin. Main outcome measure: The primary outcome was overall sustained virological response (persistently undetectable) 12 weeks after the end of therapy (SVR12). Results: A total of 202 patients were analysed. All patients in whom the primary outcome was evaluable achieved SVR12 overall [100% (197/197), 95% confidence interval 86% to 100%], demonstrating non-inferiority between fixed- and variable-duration strategies (difference 0%, 95% confidence interval –3.8% to 3.7%, prespecified non-inferiority margin 4%). A SVR12 following first-line treatment was achieved in 91% (92/101; 95% confidence interval 86% to 97%) of participants randomised to the fixed-duration strategy and by 48% (47/98; 95% confidence interval 39% to 57%) allocated to the variable-duration strategy. However, the proportion achieving SVR12 was significantly higher among those allocated to variable ultrashort strategy 2 [72% (23/32), 95% confidence interval 56% to 87%] than among those allocated to variable ultrashort strategy 1 [36% (24/66), 95% confidence interval 25% to 48%]. Overall, a SVR12 following first-line treatment was achieved by 72% (70/101) (95% confidence interval 65% to 78%) of patients treated with ribavirin and by 68% (69/98) (95% confidence interval 61% to 76%) of those not treated with ribavirin. A SVR12 with variable ultrashort strategies 1 and 2 was 52% (25/48) (95% confidence interval 38% to 65%) with ribavirin, compared with 44% (22/50) (95% confidence interval 31% to 56) without. However, at treatment failure, the emergence of viral resistance was lower with ribavirin [12% (3/26), 95% confidence interval 2% to 30%] than without [38% (11/29), 95% confidence interval 21% to 58%; p = 0.01]. All 10 individuals who became undetectable at day 3 of treatment achieved first-line SVR12 regardless of treatment duration. Five participants in the variable-duration arm and five in the fixed-duration arm experienced serious adverse events (p = 0.69), as did five participants receiving ribavirin and five participants receiving no ribavirin. Conclusions: SVR12 rates were significantly higher when ultrashort treatment varied between 4 and 7 weeks, rather than between 4 and 6 weeks. We found no evidence of ribavirin significantly affecting first-line SVR12, with unsuccessful first-line short-course therapy also not compromising subsequent retreatment with sofosbuvir, ledipasvir and ribavirin. Future work: A priority for future work needs to be the development and evaluation of robust predictive measures to identify those patients who can be cured with ultrashort courses of therapy. Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN37915093, EudraCT 2015-005004-28 and CTA 19174/0370/001-0001. Funding: This project was funded by the Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation programme, a MRC and National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) partnership. This will be published in full in Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation; Vol. 8, No. 17. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Hepatitis C virus is a major cause of liver disease worldwide. It is estimated that globally 170 million people are affected. Infection is parenteral. In many countries most recent acquisition is in people who inject drugs, but transmission worldwide also occurs in in healthcare settings due to the reuse or inadequate sterilization of medical equipment and the transfusion of unscreened blood and blood products. Sexual transmission also occurs, particularly in men who have sex with men. The virus has a tendency to become persistent in most of those infected. However, a substantial minority (around 25%) do clear the virus as a result of effective innate and adaptive immune responses at the times of acute infection. In those with persistent infection, the clinical course is quite variable. Treatment with directly acting antiviral drugs is well tolerated and leads to very high cure rates in chronic disease.