We summarise here the information to be provided to women and referring physicians about percutaneous breast biopsy and lesion localisation under imaging guidance. After explaining why a preoperative diagnosis with a percutaneous biopsy is preferred to surgical biopsy, we illustrate the criteria used by radiologists for choosing the most appropriate combination of device type for sampling and imaging technique for guidance. Then, we describe the commonly used devices, from fine-needle sampling to tissue biopsy with larger needles, namely core needle biopsy and vacuum-assisted biopsy, and how mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, ultrasound, or magnetic resonance imaging work for targeting the lesion for sampling or localisation. The differences among the techniques available for localisation (carbon marking, metallic wire, radiotracer injection, radioactive seed, and magnetic seed localisation) are illustrated. Type and rate of possible complications are described and the issue of concomitant antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy is also addressed. The importance of pathological-radiological correlation is highlighted: when evaluating the results of any needle sampling, the radiologist must check the concordance between the cytology/pathology report of the sample and the radiological appearance of the biopsied lesion. We recommend that special attention is paid to a proper and tactful approach when communicating to the woman the need for tissue sampling as well as the possibility of cancer diagnosis, repeat tissue sampling, and or even surgery when tissue sampling shows a lesion with uncertain malignant potential (also referred to as “high-risk” or B3 lesions). Finally, seven frequently asked questions are answered.

An update of the 2010 published ESUR recommendations of MRI of the sonographically indeterminate adnexal mass integrating functional techniques is provided. An algorithmic approach using sagittal T2 and a set of transaxial T1 and T2WI allows categorization of adnexal masses in one of the following three types according to its predominant signal characteristics. T1 'bright' masses due to fat or blood content can be simply and effectively determined using a combination of T1W, T2W and FST1W imaging. When there is concern for a solid component within such a mass, it requires additional assessment as for a complex cystic or cystic-solid mass. For low T2 solid adnexal masses, DWI is now recommended. Such masses with low DWI signal on high b value image (e.g. > b 1000 s/mm2) can be regarded as benign. Any other solid adnexal mass, displaying intermediate or high DWI signal, requires further assessment by contrast-enhanced (CE)T1W imaging, ideally with DCE MR, where a type 3 curve is highly predictive of malignancy. For complex cystic or cystic-solid masses, both DWI and CET1W—preferably DCE MRI—is recommended. Characteristic enhancement curves of solid components can discriminate between lesions that are highly likely malignant and highly likely benign.

This review summarizes published studies comparing long with abbreviated MRI protocols of the breast in detecting and characterizing breast lesions. (C) 2017 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Purpose To prospectively determine whether the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of the cervix is associated with preterm delivery in asymptomatic patients with a sonographic cervical length of 15 mm or less and positive fetal fibronectin test results between 23 and 28 weeks of gestation. Materials and Methods The institutional review board approved this prospective hypotheses-generating study. A total of 30 pregnant women (mean gestational age, 26 weeks) with a sonographic short cervix (≤15 mm) underwent pelvic 1.5-T magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Oblique sagittal diffusion-weighted images were obtained with b values of 0, 400, and 800 sec/mm(2). ADC values at MR imaging of the subglandular and stromal cervix and the difference between both were correlated to the interval to delivery. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to obtain sensitivity and specificity of ADC values in association with delivery within 7 days. Results Eight (27%) of 30 patients delivered within 6 or 7 days after MR imaging (impending delivery group), and 22 (73%) of 30 patients delivered between 18 and 89 days after imaging (mean, 55 days) (late delivery group). Mean subglandular ADC and mean ADC difference were higher (P < .001) in patients with impending delivery than in those with late delivery ([2406.3 ± 166.0] × 10(-6) mm(2)/sec vs [1708.9 ± 108.1] × 10(-6) mm(2)/sec and [657.3 ± 129.9] × 10(-6) mm(2)/sec vs [69.2 ± 70.2] × 10(-6) mm(2)/sec, respectively). Subglandular ADC inversely correlated with the interval between MR imaging and delivery (r = -0.75). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of subglandular ADC revealed 100% sensitivity (95% confidence interval: 63.1, 100) and 100% specificity (95% confidence interval: 84.6, 100) in association with impending delivery with a 1921 × 10(-6) mm(2)/sec threshold. Stromal ADC and sonographic cervical length showed no difference between groups (P = .072 and P = .511, respectively). Conclusion Cervical subglandular ADC at MR imaging is associated with impending preterm birth in patients with a short sonographic cervix. (©) RSNA, 2016.

Endometriosis is a common gynaecological condition of unknown aetiology that primarily affects women of reproductive age. The accepted first-line imaging modality is pelvic ultrasound. However, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly performed as an additional investigation in complex cases and for surgical planning. There is currently no international consensus regarding patient preparation, MRI protocols or reporting criteria. Our aim was to develop clinical guidelines for MRI evaluation of pelvic endometriosis based on literature evidence and consensus expert opinion. This work was performed by a group of radiologists from the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR), experts in gynaecological imaging and a gynaecologist expert in methodology. The group discussed indications for MRI, technical requirements, patient preparation, MRI protocols and criteria for the diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis on MRI. The expert panel proposed a final recommendation for each criterion using Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine (OCEBM) 2011 levels of evidence. Key Points • This report provides guidelines for MRI in endometriosis . • Minimal and optimal MRI acquisition protocols are provided . • Recommendations are proposed for patient preparation , best MRI sequences and reporting criteria .

Le compte rendu en IRM du pelvis de la femme comporte les chapitres indication, technique, description et conclusion. Les éléments systématiques de l’indication concernent les symptômes, des anomalies de l’examen clinique, le nombre d’enfants, une éventuelle césarienne, la date des dernières règles, la contraception orale ou un traitement hormonal, les antécédents chirurgicaux gynécologiques et familiaux de cancers ovariens ou mammaires. La technique résume la préparation de la patiente (antipéristalique, opacification vaginale ou rectale), la pondération et l’incidence des séquences avec ou sans suppression de graisse, le nom et la quantité de produit de contraste intraveineux éventuel. La description suit une check-list anatomique et précise des informations qui dépendent de l’indication. La conclusion rappelle les éléments pathologiques et répond à la question du clinicien.

L’écoulement mamelonnaire est le 3e symptôme de consultation en sénologie. Il est multipore, physiologique, durant le post-partum ou la grossesse, iatrogène par des médicaments anxiolytiques, antidépresseurs ou la consommation de cannabis ou fonctionnelle par hyperprolactinémie réactionnelle à des stimulations mécaniques répétées ou à un adénome hypophysaire. Il est pathologique quand il est unipore, unilatéral, persistant et spontané.

OBJECTIVE:To design clear guidelines for the staging and follow-up of patients with uterine cervical cancer, and to provide the radiologist with a framework for use in multidisciplinary conferences.METHODS:Guidelines for uterine cervical cancer staging and follow-up were defined by the female imaging subcommittee of the ESUR (European Society of Urogenital Radiology) based on the expert consensus of imaging protocols of 11 leading institutions and a critical review of the literature.RESULTS:The results indicated that high field Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) should include at least two T2-weighted sequences in sagittal, axial oblique or coronal oblique orientation (short and long axis of the uterine cervix) of the pelvic content. Axial T1-weighted sequence is useful to detect suspicious pelvic and abdominal lymph nodes, and images from symphysis to the left renal vein are required. The intravenous administration of Gadolinium-chelates is optional but is often required for small lesions (<2 cm) and for follow-up after treatment. Diffusion-weighted sequences are optional but are recommended to help evaluate lymph nodes and to detect a residual lesion after chemoradiotherapy.CONCLUSIONS:Expert consensus and literature review lead to an optimized MRI protocol to stage uterine cervical cancer. MRI is the imaging modality of choice for preoperative staging and follow-up in patients with uterine cervical cancer.

OBJECTIVES:To assess whether changes in signal intensity of cervical stroma layers on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are associated with spontaneous preterm delivery.METHODS:Prospective cohort study of women admitted for threatened late miscarriage or preterm delivery between 18 and 34 weeks of gestation. We performed T2-weighted low-field MRI of the uterine cervix among 100 women. Cervical stromal differentiation, defined as the contrast between signal intensities of the inner and outer cervical layers, was classified as high, intermediate, or low by a radiologist blinded to the participant's clinical report. The main outcome measure was the proportion of spontaneous preterm delivery.RESULTS:Thirty-six women had a spontaneous preterm delivery. The proportion of spontaneous preterm delivery for high, intermediate, and low stromal differentiation was 7/24 (29%), 21/64 (33%; risk ratio 1.1; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.6-2.3), and 8/12 (67%; risk ratio 2.3; 95% CI: 1.1-4.8), respectively. The risk of delivering within 7 days increased when stromal differentiation decreased, although the difference was not statistically significant.CONCLUSIONS:The risk of spontaneous preterm delivery is increased in women with low cervical stromal differentiation on MRI. This risk is also associated with short cervical length, a measurement easier and less costly to obtain by transvaginal ultrasound.

OBJECTIVE:To design clear guidelines for the staging and follow-up of patients with ovarian cancer, and to provide the radiologist with a framework for use in multidisciplinary conferences.METHODS:Guidelines for ovarian cancer staging and follow-up were defined by the female imaging subcommittee of the ESUR (European Society of Urogenital Radiology) based on the expert consensus of imaging protocols of 12 leading institutions and a critical review of the literature.RESULTS:Computed tomography (CT) with coverage of the base of the lungs to the inguinal region is regarded as the imaging technique of choice for preoperative staging. Critical diagnostic criteria are presented and the basis for a structured report for preoperative staging is outlined. Following primary treatment for ovarian cancer, clinical assessment and CA-125 are routinely used to monitor patients. For suspected recurrence, CT remains the imaging modality of choice, with positron emission tomography (PET)/CT emerging as the optimal imaging technique for suspected recurrence, particularly in patients with negative CT or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).CONCLUSIONS:CT is the imaging modality of choice for preoperative staging and detection of recurrence in patients with ovarian cancer.

A significant proportion of adnexal masses detected by sonography are indeterminate. Either their organ of origin is uncertain or it is unclear whether their nature is benign or malignant. MR imaging of the sonographically indeterminate adnexal mass can resolve most of these uncertainties. Most indeterminate masses result from common benign conditions and women with such masses can avoid unnecessary or inappropriate surgery. For the minority of women whose masses are malignant, use of MR imaging rather than a 'wait and watch' strategy of repeat ultrasound (US) results in a more timely diagnosis. There are simple diagnostic steps in the MR imaging assessment which direct an algorithmic and problem-solving approach based on signal characteristics and morphology. MR imaging should provide a more timely diagnosis and, thereby, guide the management of the patient with reduced costs of investigation and treatment.

We studied the influence of signal variability on human and model observers for detection tasks with realistic simulated masses superimposed on real patient mammographic backgrounds and synthesized mammographic backgrounds (clustered lumpy backgrounds, CLB). Results under the signal-known-exactly (SKE) paradigm were compared with signal-known-statistically (SKS) tasks for which the observers did not have prior knowledge of the shape or size of the signal. Human observers' performance did not vary significantly when benign masses were superimposed on real images or on CLB. Uncertainty and variability in signal shape did not degrade human performance significantly compared with the SKE task, while variability in signal size did. Implementation of appropriate internal noise components allowed the fit of model observers to human performance.