The hippocampus is thought to form cognitive maps across different domains of experience, including space and time. Recent work by Knudsen and Wallis identifies a map of abstract value space in the monkey hippocampus. We consider how these abstract variables might contribute to a comprehensive hippocampal representation of ongoing experience.
The question of how the brain recognizes the faces of familiar individuals has been important throughout the history of neuroscience. Cells linking visual processing to person memory have been proposed but not found. Here, we report the discovery of such cells through recordings from an area in the macaque temporal pole identified with functional magnetic resonance imaging. These cells responded to faces that were personally familiar. They responded nonlinearly to stepwise changes in face visibility and detail and holistically to face parts, reflecting key signatures of familiar face recognition. They discriminated between familiar identities, as fast as a general face identity area. The discovery of these cells establishes a new pathway for the fast recognition of familiar individuals.
We compare several major white-matter tracts in human and macaque occipital lobe using diffusion magnetic resonance imaging. The comparison suggests similarities but also significant differences in the tracts. There are several apparently homologous tracts in the 2 species, including the vertical occipital fasciculus (VOF), optic radiation, forceps major, and inferior longitudinal fasciculus (ILF). There is one large human tract, the inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus, with no corresponding fasciculus in macaque. We could identify the macaque VOF (mVOF), which has been little studied. Its position is consistent with classical invasive anatomical studies by Wernicke. VOF homology is supported by similarity of the endpoints in V3A and ventral V4 across species. The mVOF fibers intertwine with the dorsal segment of the ILF, but the human VOF appears to be lateral to the ILF. These similarities and differences between the occipital lobe tracts will be useful in establishing which circuitry in the macaque can serve as an accurate model for human visual cortex.
The macaque monkey has been an important model for understanding human vision. A substantial literature compares human and macaque functional cortical responses to visual stimuli in order to better understand cellular mechanisms from macaque studies (Tootell et al. 2003; Wandell and Winawer 2011; Vanduffel et al. 2014). The anatomical connections in the white matter are another important source for clarifying the similarities and differences between human and macaque cortex. Recent progress on diffusion MRI and tractography enables us to identify major white matter pathways from human brains (Catani et al. 2002; Schmahmann et al. 2007; Wandell 2016). This study compares the organization of major occipital white matter tracts in human and macaque. We analyzed diffusion MRI data, collected from 4 macaques and 10 humans using the Ensemble Tractography method (Takemura et al., 2016). We identified several apparently homologous tracts in the two species, including the vertical occipital fasciculus (VOF), optic radiation, forceps major, and inferior longitudinal fasciculus (ILF). There is one large human tract, the inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus, with no corresponding fasciculus in macaque. Then we focused on the macaque VOF, which has been little studied (Yeatman et al., 2014). The estimated macaque VOF position is consistent with classical invasive anatomical studies by Wernicke. The homology of human and macaque VOF is supported because the endpoints are near similar maps (V3A and ventral V4) between human and macaque. However, the macaque VOF fibers intertwine with the dorsal segment of the ILF, while the human VOF are relatively lateral to the ILF. These similarities and differences will be useful in establishing which circuitry in the macaque can serve as an accurate model for human visual cortex. Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2017
One of the most striking properties of the adult central nervous system is its ability to undergo changes in function and/or structure. In mammals, learning is a major inducer of adaptive plasticity. Sensorimotor adaptation is a type of procedural—motor—learning that allows maintaining accurate movements in the presence of environmental or internal perturbations by adjusting motor output. In this work, we will review experimental evidence gathered from rodents and human and nonhuman primates pointing to possible sites of adaptation-related plasticity at different levels of organization of the nervous system.
One of the most striking properties of the adult central nervous system is its ability to undergo changes in function and/or structure. In mammals, learning is a major inducer of adaptive plasticity. Sensorimotor adaptation is a type of proceduralmotorlearning that allows maintaining accurate movements in the presence of environmental or internal perturbations by adjusting motor output. In this work, we will review experimental evidence gathered from rodents and human and nonhuman primates pointing to possible sites of adaptation-related plasticity at different levels of organization of the nervous system.
Savings is a fundamental property of learning. In motor adaptation, it refers to the improvement in learning observed when adaptation to a perturbation A (A1) is followed by re-adaptation to the same perturbation (A2). A common procedure to equate the initial level of error across sessions consists of restoring native sensorimotor coordinates by inserting null--unperturbed--trials (N) just before re-adaptation (washout). Here, we hypothesized that the washout is not innocuous but interferes with the expression of the new memory at recall. To assess this possibility, we measured savings following the A1NA2 protocol, where A was a 40° visual rotation. In Experiment 1, we increased the time window between N and A2 from 1 min to 24 h. This manipulation increased the amount of savings during middle to late phases of adaptation, suggesting that N interfered with the retrieval of A. In Experiment 2, we used repetitive TMS to evaluate if this interference was partly mediated by the sensorimotor cortex (SM). We conclude that the washout does not just restore the unperturbed sensorimotor coordinates, but inhibits the expression of the recently acquired visuomotor map through a mechanism involving SM. Our results resemble the phenomenon of extinction in classical conditioning.
The neural mechanisms mediating the activation of the motor system during action observation, also known as motor resonance, are of major interest to the field of motor control. It has been proposed that motor resonance develops in infants through Hebbian plasticity of pathways connecting sensory and motor regions that fire simultaneously during imitation or self movement observation. A fundamental problem when testing this theory in adults is that most experimental paradigms involve actions that have been overpracticed throughout life. Here, we directly tested the sensorimotor theory of motor resonance by creating new visuomotor representations using abstract stimuli (motor symbols) and identifying the neural networks recruited through fMRI. We predicted that the network recruited during action observation and execution would overlap with that recruited during observation of new motor symbols. Our results indicate that a network consisting of premotor and posterior parietal cortex, the supplementary motor area, the inferior frontal gyrus and cerebellum was activated both by new motor symbols and by direct observation of the corresponding action. This tight spatial overlap underscores the importance of sensorimotor learning for motor resonance and further indicates that the physical characteristics of the perceived stimulus are irrelevant to the evoked response in the observer.
The neural bases of motor adaptation have been extensively explored in human and nonhuman primates. A network including the cerebellum, primary motor cortex, and posterior parietal cortex appears to be crucial for this type of learning. Yet, to date, it is unclear whether these regions contribute directly or indirectly to the formation of motor memories. Here we trained subjects on a complex visuomotor rotation associated with long-term memory (in the order of months) to identify potential sites of structural plasticity induced by adaptation. One week of training led to (1) an increment in local gray matter concentration over the hand area of the contralateral primary motor cortex and (2) an increase in fractional anisotropy in an area underneath this region that correlated with the speed of learning. Moreover, the change in gray matter concentration measured immediately after training predicted improvements in the speed of learning during readaptation 1 year later. Our study suggests that motor adaptation induces structural plasticity in primary motor circuits. In addition, it provides the first piece of evidence indicating that early structural changes induced by motor learning may impact on behavior up to 1 year after training.