Background Patient reported experience measures are contemporary quality indicators that focus on evaluation of healthcare delivery processes. While surgical arteriovenous fistulas (otherAVF) are preferred for haemodialysis vascular access, fears about surgery and complications often result in refusal/delays. A new technique of endovascular arteriovenous fistula creation (EndoAVF) has been developed and as part of it’s ongoing introduction into our unit, the patient perspective was felt critical to its evaluation. The Vascular Access Questionnaire (VAQ) provides a mechanism for identifying and scoring perceptions in this setting. Method Patients who had previously undergone EndoAVF formation were approached to undertake the VAQ as part of a service evaluation of their experience. In addition to the components of the VAQ, data questions relating to the patient’s perception of their access were gathered. Results were compared with a matched historical cohort of surgically created fistulas (otherAVF) patients. Results Patient satisfaction and self-reported ease of use with EndoAVF were high. Overall VAQ scores were similar between the EndoAVF and the surgically created cohort. Functionally, there was no significant difference in perception of their fistula by patients, irrespective of them being created surgically or radiologically. Conclusion Although numbers in this report are small limiting exploration of preserved inherent heterogeneity, we provide a useful initial patient reported experience and perspectives on comparative functional use of radiologically and surgically created AVFs. As real world experience gathers, future larger cohorts with adequate sampling may allow exploration of patient reported experiences and outcome measures.

Clinically-oriented outcome measures are increasingly being recognized as lacking in consideration of factors important to patients. There is an emerging move of guideline bodies advocating a more patient-centred approach. Aneurysms in autogenous arteriovenous fistula (AVF) can be considered unsightly and a constant reminder for patients of their dependence on dialysis. However, their impact on patient’s perception has not previously been reported. Between April 2017–18, the Vascular Access Questionnaire (VAQ) was administered to prevalent haemodialysis patients across ten dialysis units via structured interviews, as part of a quality improvement project. Data for the subgroup of patients with aneurysmal AVF (categorised as per classification by Valenti et al.), were retrospectively evaluated and compared to the wider cohort. Data were collected for 539 patients (median age: 66 years; 59

Quality improvement initiatives should be aimed to enhance clinical outcomes, service delivery and quality of life for patients. For patients reliant on haemodialysis, vascular access is a lifeline. Survival differences relating to the type of vascular access are evident and many initiatives have focussed on increasing absolute rates of arteriovenous fistulas and/or decreasing central venous catheter use. While these have achieved some success quantitatively, the qualitative effects are less obvious. The aims of this review article are to explore the concepts of quality of care in vascular access. There is a paucity of studies into the effects of vascular access on the quality of life of dialysis patients, and where studies have been performed, generalised patient-reported outcome measures have been used. To facilitate the implementation of quality improvement programmes specifically for vascular access requires suitable tools. While existing patient-reported outcome measures may be applicable to vascular access, it is likely that these will require further evaluation, and the development of vascular access-specific patient-reported outcome measures may be required.

Background. Increasing numbers of patients with end-stage renal failure are receiving kidneys from nondirected kidney donors (NKDs), also known as altruistic donors. Transplant outcomes for recipients of such kidneys are largely inferred from studies on specified kidney donors (SKDs), which may be inaccurate due to differences in donor, recipient and transplant specific factors. We report the outcomes for recipients of NKD in the United Kingdom. Methods. Outcomes for 6861 patients receiving a living donor kidney transplant between January 2007 and December 2014 were analyzed using both the National Health Service Blood and Transplant and the UK Renal Registry datasets. Graft and patient outcomes were compared for patients receiving NKD and SKD organs using univariable and multivariable analyses. Results. There was significant discordance between the NKD and SKD donors and recipients. These included increased donor age (median, 58 years vs 47 years; P < 0.001) and higher rates of hemodialysis and previous transplants in the NKD group (both P < 0.001). Despite such markers of increased risk among both donors and recipients of NKD kidneys, there was no difference in graft survival on univariable (hazard ratio, 1.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.77-1.86; P = 0.419) or multivariable analysis (hazard ratio, 1.13; 95% confidence interval, 0.65-1.95; P = 0.665). Conclusions. Despite some markers of transplant complexity, nondirected kidney donor organs are an excellent source of organs for transplantation.

Haemodialysis is capable of prolonging life in patients with end stage renal disease, however this therapy comes with significant negative impact on quality of life. For patients requiring haemodialysis, the need for an adequately functioning vascular access (VA) is an everyday concern. The Vascular Access Questionnaire (VAQ) provides a mechanism for identifying and scoring factors in haemodialysis that impact on patients’ quality of life and perception of their therapy. Between April 2017–18 the VAQ was administered to prevalent haemodialysis patients at 10 units in the West Midlands via structured interviews. 749 of 920 potentially eligible patients completed the survey. The mean VAQ score was seen to improve significantly with age (7.7 in < 55 vs. 3.8 in 75+) and the duration of access (8.9 if less than 1 month old vs. 5.0 at a year). Better average scores were demonstrated for Arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) than other modalities (AVF 5.1 vs. AVG (arteriovenous grafts) 7.2 vs. CVC (central venous catheter) 6.6). There was no significant difference in scores between fistulas on non-dominant or dominant arms, with both having a mean of 5.2 (p = 0.341). Overall, better satisfaction scores were seen in AVF. The presence of an AVF on the non-dominant arm was not a concern for the majority of patients and did not affect the VAQ score. A number of factors were identified that can influence VAQ satisfaction score.

Background Increasing numbers of patients with end-stage renal failure are receiving kidneys from nondirected kidney donors (NKDs), also known as altruistic donors. Transplant outcomes for recipients of such kidneys are largely inferred from studies on specified kidney donors (SKDs), which may be inaccurate due to differences in donor, recipient and transplant specific factors. We report the outcomes for recipients of NKD in the United Kingdom. Methods Outcomes for 6861 patients receiving a living donor kidney transplant between January 2007 and December 2014 were analyzed using both the National Health Service Blood and Transplant and the UK Renal Registry datasets. Graft and patient outcomes were compared for patients receiving NKD and SKD organs using univariable and multivariable analyses. Results There was significant discordance between the NKD and SKD donors and recipients. These included increased donor age (median, 58 years vs 47 years; P < 0.001) and higher rates of hemodialysis and previous transplants in the NKD group (both P < 0.001). Despite such markers of increased risk among both donors and recipients of NKD kidneys, there was no difference in graft survival on univariable (hazard ratio, 1.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.77-1.86; P = 0.419) or multivariable analysis (hazard ratio, 1.13; 95% confidence interval, 0.65-1.95; P = 0.665). Conclusions Despite some markers of transplant complexity, nondirected kidney donor organs are an excellent source of organs for transplantation.

Journal of Kidney CareVol. 2, No. 6 EditorialRight access, for the right patient, at the right timeNicholas Inston, Melanie FieldNicholas InstonSearch for more papers by this author, Melanie FieldSearch for more papers by this authorNicholas Inston; Melanie FieldPublished Online:22 Nov 2017https://doi.org/10.12968/jokc.2017.2.6.300AboutSectionsView articleView Full TextPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail View article References Kosa SD, Bhola C, Lok CE. Hemodialysis patients' satisfaction and perspectives on complications associated with vascular access related interventions: are we listening? J Vasc Access. 2016; 17(4):313–319 Google ScholarLok CE. Fistula first initiative: advantages and pitfalls. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007;2(5):1043–1053 Google ScholarPaule K. UK renal vascular access special interest groups—the joint partnership. 2017. http://tinyurl.com/yacjhmqt (accessed 6 November 2017) Google ScholarRavani P, Quinn R, Oliver M et al.. Examining the association between hemodialysis access type and mortality: the role of access complications. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;12(6):955–964 Google ScholarXi W, Harwood L, Diamant MJ et al.. Patient attitudes towards the arteriovenous fistula: a qualitative study on vascular access decision making. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011;26(10):3302–3308 Google Scholar FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byCannulation of arteriovenous fistulae and grafts for dialysisCatherine Fielding, Helen Spooner, Margaret Aitken24 March 2018 | Journal of Kidney Care, Vol. 3, No. 2 2 November 2017Volume 2Issue 6ISSN (print): 2397-9534ISSN (online): 2397-9542 Metrics History Published online 22 November 2017 Published in print 2 November 2017 Information© MA Healthcare LimitedPDF download

BACKGROUND:Arteriovenous fistulas are critical for haemodialysis, but maturation rates remain poor. Experimental and anecdotal evidence has supported the use of transdermal glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) patches. The aim of this RCT was to determine whether use of a GTN patch aids arteriovenous fistula maturation.METHODS:Patients referred for arteriovenous fistula formation were eligible. The GTN or placebo patch was applied immediately after surgery and left in situ for 24 h. The primary outcome measure was the change in venous diameter at 6 weeks after fistula formation. The secondary outcome measure was clinical fistula patency at 6 weeks.RESULTS:Of 200 patients recruited (533 screened), 101 were randomized to the placebo group and 99 to the GTN group. Of these, 81 and 86 respectively completed surgery, and had follow-up data available at 6 weeks. Improvements in venous diameter were similar in the two groups: mean(s.d.) increase 2·3(1·9) mm in the placebo group compared with 2·2(1·8) mm in the GTN group (P = 0·704). The fistula failure rate did not differ significantly between the two groups: 23 per cent for placebo and 28 per cent for GTN (P = 0·596).CONCLUSION:GTN transdermal patches used for 24 h after surgery did not improve arteriovenous fistula maturation.REGISTRATION NUMBER:NCT01685710 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Purpose Efforts to promote arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) have been successful in increasing the prevalence of AVF use as the primary vascular access for haemodialysis (HD). Sustained preference for AVF use may not be the most appropriate vascular access choice for all patient groups. Arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) offer advantages of earlier use and lower primary failure rates compared to AVFs so may be preferable for patients where short-term vascular access is needed. This study was designed to assess comparative mortality in different age groups following AVF formation. Methods A prospective cohort of patients having AVF creation was recruited. Patients were subdivided into three age groups: Group A: <50 years; Group B: 50-74 years and Group C: ≥75 years. Survival curves and Cox regression analysis were performed on each of these groups. Results One hundred and thirty-four patients (n = 134) were recruited into the study. The prevalence of diabetes increased significantly with age. As expected, mortality was higher in older age groups (log rank (Mantel-Cox) 19.227; p = 0.0001). Mortality rates at 1 year were 0% in group A, 12.5% in group B and 29.1% in group C. Medium-term mortality at 4 years was 7.9% in group A, 39.1% in group B and 54.8% in group C. Conclusions We found a significantly higher mortality rate in patients ≥75 years in comparison to those <75 years. The choice of vascular access modality should be tailored to the individual with particular reference to the patient's expected survival.

We maintain that in a select group of patients where projected survival is expected to be limited (less than 2 years) grafts represent a viable option. Benefits of AVG over AVF are a superior primary patency, reduction in time required for maturation and a potential reduction in the number of patients commencing dialysis on a CVC. The dogmatic approach of an AVF first in this patient group may result in worse outcome, longer time to a working AVF and overall detriment of patient care.

Background. Laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy (LDN) exerts systemic effects causing transaminitis and increased urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalm (NGAL) excretion. Hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy, which tends to be shorter with less pneumoperitoneum, may be hypothesized to produce less systemic stimulation than total laparoscopic LDN.Methods. Serial urine and serum samples were collected from 15 patients undergoing HALDN. Samples were analyzed for NGAL and kidney injury molecule 1 (KIM-1) levels preoperatively and 24 hours post-surgery. Data relating to alanine aminotransferase, creatinine, and estimated glomerular filtration rate was also analyzed in 48 live donors preoperatively and at 24 hours and 48 hours post-surgery and compared to published data on LDN.Results. Expected changes to creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rates were observed in the donors. Compared to the preoperative levels, alanine aminotransferase levels showed a significant decrease at 24 hours (P = .004) and were not sigthficantly different from baseline levels at 48 hours (P = .08). Serum KIM-1 and NGAL levels remained unchanged (P = .89 and P = .14, respectively) at 24 hours after donation. Similarly, urinary levels of KIM-1 and NGAL were not statistically significantly different after donation. Mean operating time for this cohort was 1 hour, 36 minutes.Conclusions. In contrast to other published data, our cohort did not exhibit changes to liver function tests or biomarker changes after donor nephrectomy. This could be because of the lower operative time (96 minutes vs. 216 minutes) or because of the intermittent release of the pneumoperitoneum in the hand-assisted method which may exert less of a systemic inflammatory response.

Background: Renal replacement therapy using dialysis has evolved dramatically over recent years with an improvement in patient survival. With this increased longevity, a cohort of patients are in the precarious position of having exhausted the standard routes of vascular access. The extent of this problem of failed access or 'desperate measures' access is difficult to determine, as there are no uniform definitions or classification allowing standardization and few studies have been performed. The aim of this study is to propose a classification of end-stage vascular access (VA) failure and subsequently test its applicability in a dialysis population.Methods: Using anatomical stratification, a simple hierarchical classification is proposed. This has been applied to a large dialysis population and in particular to patients referred to the complex access clinic dedicated to patients identified as having exhausted standard VA options and also those dialysing on permanent central venous catheters (CVC).Results: A simple classification is proposed based on a progressive anatomical grading of (I) standard upper arm options exhausted, (II) femoral options exhausted and (III) other options exhausted. These are further subdivided anatomically to allow ease of classification. When applied to a complex group of patients (n = 145) referred to a dedicated complex access clinic, 21 patients were Class I, 26 Class II and 2 Class III. Ninety-six patients did not fall into the classification despite being referred as permanent CVC.Conclusions: The numbers of patients who have exhausted definitive access options will continue to increase. This simple classification allows the scope of the problem and proposed solutions to be identified. Furthermore, these solutions can be studied and treatments compared in a standardized fashion. The classificationmay also be applied if patients have the option of transplantation where iliac vessel preservation is desirable and prioritization policies may be instituted.

Objective. As renal transplantation continues to evolve, there appears to be a change in both donor and recipient populations. Traditional markers of high-risk donor (e.g. donation after cardiac death [DCD]/expanded criteria donor [ECD]) and recipient (e.g. obese, highly sensitized) operations appear to be more common without any noticeable worsening of patient outcome. The present study aimed to compare outcome and define the change in donor and recipient populations for cadaveric transplants over a 10-year period at a large U.K. center.Methods. Single-center analysis of all adult patients undergoing cadaveric renal transplantation between January 2004 and January 2014 (n = 754). Transplants were divided into 3 groups (early, middle, and late) depending on the era, with donor, recipient and outcomes compared.Results. There were considerable changes in both donor and recipient factors between the 3 eras, with a greater proportion of high-risk operations performed, as reflected by significant increases in Donor Risk Index (median: 1.11-1.16, P = .022), and the proportions of ECD (22.2%-33.9%, P = .003) and DCD kidneys (10.8%-19.4% P = .011). However, 1-year graft survival was comparable between the eras, with a decrease in the average 1-year serum creatinine between the early and late cohort (median: 161 mu mol/L vs 132 [mu mol/L, P < .001). There was no significant increase in body mass index (BMI) in either the donor or recipient population across the eras.Conclusion. Improvement in transplant outcome continues despite a greater proportion of transplants previously considered as high risk being performed. This is likely to reflect a considerable improvement in pre- and postoperative management. BMI remains a major continuing block to transplantation.