AbstractBackgroundAlthough morbidity and mortality from COVID-19 have been widely reported, the indirect effects of the pandemic beyond 2020 on other major diseases and health service activity have not been well described.Methods and resultsAnalyses used national administrative electronic hospital records in England, Scotland, and Wales for 2016–21. Admissions and procedures during the pandemic (2020–21) related to six major cardiovascular conditions [acute coronary syndrome (ACS), heart failure (HF), stroke/transient ischaemic attack (TIA), peripheral arterial disease (PAD), aortic aneurysm (AA), and venous thromboembolism(VTE)] were compared with the annual average in the pre-pandemic period (2016–19). Differences were assessed by time period and urgency of care.In 2020, there were 31 064 (−6%) fewer hospital admissions [14 506 (−4%) fewer emergencies, 16 560 (−23%) fewer elective admissions] compared with 2016–19 for the six major cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) combined. The proportional reduction in admissions was similar in all three countries. Overall, hospital admissions returned to pre-pandemic levels in 2021. Elective admissions remained substantially below expected levels for almost all conditions in all three countries [−10 996 (−15%) fewer admissions]. However, these reductions were offset by higher than expected total emergency admissions [+25 878 (+6%) higher admissions], notably for HF and stroke in England, and for VTE in all three countries. Analyses for procedures showed similar temporal variations to admissions.ConclusionThe present study highlights increasing emergency cardiovascular admissions during the pandemic, in the context of a substantial and sustained reduction in elective admissions and procedures. This is likely to increase further the demands on cardiovascular services over the coming years.

Mitochondrial dysfunction is a feature of type I and type II diabetes, but there is a lack of consistency between reports and links to disease development. We aimed to investigate if mitochondrial structure–function remodelling occurs in the early stages of diabetes by employing a mouse model (GENA348) of Maturity Onset Diabetes in the Young, exhibiting hyperglycemia, but not hyperinsulinemia, with mild left ventricular dysfunction. Employing 3-D electron microscopy (SBF-SEM) we determined that compared to wild-type, WT, the GENA348 subsarcolemma mitochondria (SSM) are ~ 2-fold larger, consistent with up-regulation of fusion proteins Mfn1, Mfn2 and Opa1. Further, in comparison, GENA348 mitochondria are more irregular in shape, have more tubular projections with SSM projections being longer and wider. Mitochondrial density is also increased in the GENA348 myocardium consistent with up-regulation of PGC1-α and stalled mitophagy (down-regulation of PINK1, Parkin and Miro1). GENA348 mitochondria have more irregular cristae arrangements but cristae dimensions and density are similar to WT. GENA348 Complex activity (I, II, IV, V) activity is decreased but the OCR is increased, potentially linked to a shift towards fatty acid oxidation due to impaired glycolysis. These novel data reveal that dysregulated mitochondrial morphology, dynamics and function develop in the early stages of diabetes.

Abstract Aims The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on care and outcomes across non-COVID-19 cardiovascular (CV) diseases is unknown. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to quantify the effect and investigate for variation by CV disease, geographic region, country income classification and the time course of the pandemic. Methods and results From January 2019 to December 2021, Medline and Embase databases were searched for observational studies comparing a pandemic and pre-pandemic period with relation to CV disease hospitalisations, diagnostic and interventional procedures, outpatient consultations, and mortality. Observational data were synthesised by incidence rate ratios (IRR) and risk ratios (RR) for binary outcomes and weighted mean differences for continuous outcomes with 95% confidence intervals. The study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021265930). A total of 158 studies, covering 49 countries and 6 continents, were used for quantitative synthesis. Most studies (80%) reported information for high-income countries (HICs). Across all CV disease and geographies there were fewer hospitalisations, diagnostic and interventional procedures, and outpatient consultations during the pandemic. By meta-regression, in low-middle income countries (LMICs) compared to HICs the decline in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) hospitalisations (RR 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66–0.94) and revascularisation (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.62–0.87) was more severe. In LMICs, but not HICs, in-hospital mortality increased for STEMI (RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.10–1.37) and heart failure (RR 1.08, 95% CI 1.04–1.12). The magnitude of decline in hospitalisations for CV diseases did not differ between the first and second wave. Conclusions There was substantial global collateral CV damage during the COVID-19 pandemic with disparity in severity by country income classification.

OBJECTIVE:The primary objective was to assess the performance of a new generation thin-strut sirolimus-eluting coronary stent with abluminal biodegradable polymer in an all comer population. The secondary objective was to detail differences in contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) practice worldwide. METHODS:e-Ultimaster was an all-comer, prospective, global registry (NCT02188355) with independent event adjudication enrolling patients undergoing PCI with the study stent. The primary outcome measure was target lesion failure (TLF) at 1 year, defined as the composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction and clinically driven target lesion revascularisation. Data were stratified according to 4 geographical regions. RESULTS:A total of 37 198 patients were enrolled (Europe 69.2%, Asia 17.8%, Africa/Middle East 6.6% and South America/Mexico 6.5%) and 1-year follow-up was available for 35 389 patients (95.1%). One-year TLF occurred in 3.2% of the patients, ranging from 2% (Africa/Middle East) to 4.1% (South America/Mexico). In patients with acute coronary syndrome, potent P2Y12 inhibitors were prescribed in 48% of patients at discharge, while at 1 year 72% were on any dual antiplatelet therapy. Lipid-lowering treatment was administered in 80.9% and 75.5% of patients at discharge and 1 year, respectively. Regional differences in the profile of the treated patients as well as in PCI practice were reported. CONCLUSIONS:In this investigation with worldwide representation, contemporary PCI using a new generation thin-strut sirolimus-eluting coronary stent with abluminal biodegradable polymer was associated with low 1-year TLF across clinical presentations and continents. Suboptimal adherence to current recommendations around antiplatelet and lipid lowering treatments was detected.

Heart failure (HF) is a leading cause of hospitalisation, morbidity, and mortality in men and women, accounting for 46 076 annual HF deaths in women and 2.6 million women living with HF between 2015 and 2018 in the USA. Sex differences across the HF spectrum are well defined and pertain to risk factors, aetiology, provision of evidencebased therapies, referral to services, treatment response and clinical outcomes in both the acute and chronic HF syndrome setting. Much of our evidence base for the management of HF is derived from randomised clinical trials (RCTs) that inform best practice for the treatment of HF and shape guideline recommendations. The value of such trials in informing the management of HF in both men and women depends on representativeness of trial populations. Underenrolment of women in HF trials is well documented, including in landmark trials that have informed care. Since 2000, multiple studies have examined the recruitment of women in HF RCTs and reported that enrolment of women has varied between 21% and 29%, which is significantly below the prevalence of HF at the population level. In an attempt to quantify the representativeness in trials, recent studies have used the ratio of trial participation to disease prevalence ratio (PPR). A PPR <0.8 is considered low and indicates underrepresentation. A recent analysis of 740 cardiovascular trials (102 trials in HF) registered between 2010 and 2017 has shown the lowest PPR of 0.48 in HF trials. This is despite the fact that legislature such as the National Institutes of Health Revitalization Act stipulates the inclusion of women and men in clinical trials proportionate to the sexrelated prevalence of the disease under investigation, to provide data on the treatment effect of interventions/treatments studied in both women and men. Recent studies have tried to understand the factors responsible for low enrolment of women in HF trials. The low enrolment rates of women in cardiovascular clinical trials have historically been attributed to agerecruitment bias since cardiovascular disease is seen predominantly in older women. However, recent multivariable analyses have revealed trial characteristics such as ambulatory recruitment, sexspecific exclusion criteria, drug, device and surgical interventions, exclusively male trial leadership and trial coordination in North America, Europe and Asia to be independently associated with underenrolment of women in HFrEF RCTs. Moreover, poor awareness of HF trials, concerns around greater perceived risks from trial participation and childcare responsibilities have been reported as additional barriers to more equitable participation of women in clinical trials. It is important to highlight that randomised control trials led by women have greater odds of enrolling a representative sample of women and women steering committee members. 8 9 In the present study, Morgan et al have undertaken a systemic review of HF trials published in seven highimpact clinical journals (impact factor >20) to explore the reasons behind sex disparities in enrolment in HF RCTs. Furthermore, in an attempt to determine whether recruitment to RCTs was significantly below the population level prevalence of HF in women, large HF registries and population statistics were identified using the same criteria. The systemic review included data from 146 HF RCTs and 2 48 620 patients (2000–2020). The median proportion of women recruited into RCTs was 25.8% (IQR 21.3–36.0), which was significantly lower than the median proportion of women recruited into registries (40.2% IQR 32.3–52.8) or from populationlevel data (49.0% IQR 38.2–53.4) suggesting significant underenrolment of women. Average age of patients enrolled was lower in trials than in registries and population datasets, and for each condition, the enrolment of women was lower in trials than in registries and population datasets. This is concordant with the pragmatic eligibility criteria and processes of registries and population datasets that result in more representative patient populations. The largest gap between trial, registry and population enrolment of women was seen in ischaemic cardiomyopathy 17.9% (IQR 11.7–21.2) vs 37.7% (IQR 33.2–41.3) in registries and severe systolic dysfunction (left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <35%) 21.4% (IQR 17.7–25.7) compared with registries 25.4% (IQR 23.7–27.2) and population statistics 28.2% (IQR 26.0–30.4). Trials involving an invasive procedure or surgical treatment recruited the lowest proportion of women (21.2%). Enrolment of women in HFpEF trials was greater than in HFrEF trials, reflecting the women preponderance of HFpEF. Women represented more than half (51.6% (IQR 48.6–52.0)) of HFpEF trial participants, with smaller gaps relative to registry (54.8% (IQR 50.8–61.0)) or population datasets (56.5% (IQR 52.2–64.8)). The estimated PPR of 0.9 in HFpEF trials suggested representative enrolment of women in these trials. While prior studies have reported many of the findings in the current study, including low representation of women in HF trials and more women in HFpEF trials, 4 the strengths of this study include a systematic assessment of the prevalence of HF at a registry and population level to place the findings of the study into a broader context, and the analysis of variations in women enrolment across different degrees of LV function as well as HF an aetiology and intervention type. There are several limitations of the current study, particularly in restricting analysis to journals with impact factor of >20 that may bias results towards prominent RCTs led in North America and Europe and towards large RCT focused towards pharmacological treatments and interventions, rather than implementation of evidence based therapies/healthcare delivery that may not necessarily be published in such high impact journals. All analyses were descriptive, and independent associations between trial of disease characteristics and enrolment of women were not explored. Furthermore, although the data presented provides compelling evidence of sex disparities in recruitment to HF trials, the contribution of different biases—such as selection, gender and age biases—to such disparities remains poorly defined. Given the retrospective nature of the article, patient level characteristics such as consent, age, disease severity, study factors such as screening and recruitment strategies for the trials were not accounted for. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, California, USA Department of Medicine, Population Health Research Institute, Research Institute of St. Joseph’s, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada Keele Cardiovascular Research Institute, Keele University, StokeonTrent, UK

Background: It is unknown to what extent the clinical benefits of PCI outweigh the risks and costs in patients with vs. without cancer and within each cancer type. We performed the first known nationally representative propensity score analysis of PCI mortality and cost among all eligible adult inpatients by cancer and its types. Methods: This multicenter case-control study used machine learning–augmented propensity score–adjusted multivariable regression to assess the above outcomes and disparities using the 2016 nationally representative National Inpatient Sample. Results: Of the 30,195,722 hospitalized patients, 15.43% had a malignancy, 3.84% underwent an inpatient PCI (of whom 11.07% had cancer and 0.07% had metastases), and 2.19% died inpatient. In fully adjusted analyses, PCI vs. medical management significantly reduced mortality for patients overall (among all adult inpatients regardless of cancer status) and specifically for cancer patients (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.75–0.89; p < 0.001), mainly driven by active vs. prior malignancy, head and neck and hematological malignancies. PCI also significantly reduced cancer patients' total hospitalization costs (beta USD$ −8,668.94, 95% CI −9,553.59 to −7,784.28; p < 0.001) independent of length of stay. There were no significant income or disparities among PCI subjects. Conclusions: Our study suggests among all eligible adult inpatients, PCI does not increase mortality or cost for cancer patients, while there may be particular benefit by cancer type. The presence or history of cancer should not preclude these patients from indicated cardiovascular care.

Abstract Aims  Fractional flow reserve (FFRCT) using computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) determines both the presence of coronary artery disease and vessel-specific ischaemia. We tested whether an evaluation strategy based on FFRCT would improve economic and clinical outcomes compared with standard care. Methods and results  Overall, 1400 patients with stable chest pain in 11 centres were randomized to initial testing with CTCA with selective FFRCT (experimental group) or standard clinical care pathways (standard group). The primary endpoint was total cardiac costs at 9 months. Secondary endpoints were angina status, quality of life, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, and use of invasive coronary angiography. Randomized groups were similar at baseline. Most patients had an initial CTCA: 439 (63%) in the standard group vs. 674 (96%) in the experimental group, 254 of whom (38%) underwent FFRCT. Mean total cardiac costs were higher by £114 (+8%) in the experimental group, with a 95% confidence interval from −£112 (−8%) to +£337 (+23%), though the difference was not significant (P = 0.10). Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events did not differ significantly (10.2% in the experimental group vs. 10.6% in the standard group) and angina and quality of life improved to a similar degree over follow-up in both randomized groups. Invasive angiography was reduced significantly in the experimental group (19% vs. 25%, P = 0.01). Conclusion  A strategy of CTCA with selective FFRCT in patients with stable angina did not differ significantly from standard clinical care pathways in cost or clinical outcomes, but did reduce the use of invasive coronary angiography.

Objectives: To examine the association between beta-blocker prescription and first primary-care consultation for knee OA, hip OA, knee pain and hip pain. Methods: Data source: Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Participants aged >= 40 years in receipt of new oral beta-blocker prescriptions were propensity score (PS) matched to an unexposed control. Cox proportional hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs were calculated, and adjusted for non-osteoporotic fractures, number of primary-care consultations for knee or hip injury, and, the number of primary-care consultations, out-patient referrals and hospitalizations in the 12 months preceding cohort entry. Analysis was stratified according to beta-blocker class and for commonly prescribed drugs. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: A total of 111 718 beta-blocker-exposed participants were 1:1 PS matched to unexposed controls. beta-blocker prescription was associated with reduced cumulative risk of knee OA, knee pain, and hip pain consultations [with a HR (95% CI) of 0.90 (0.83, 0.98), 0.88 (0.83, 0.92) and 0.85 (0.79, 0.90), respectively]. Propranolol and atenolol were associated with a lower incidence of knee OA and knee pain consultations with a HR of between 0.78 and 0.91.beta-blockers were associated with reduced incidence of consultation for large-joint lower-limb OA/pain as a composite outcome, defined as the earliest of knee OA, knee pain, hip OA or a hip pain consultation [with a HR (95% CI) of 0.87 (0.84, 0.90)]. Conclusion: Commonly used beta-blockers have analgesic properties for musculoskeletal pain. Atenolol might be a therapeutic option for OA and cardiovascular co-morbidities in which beta-blockers are indicated, while propranolol may be suitable for people with co-morbid anxiety. A confirmatory randomized controlled trial is needed before clinical practice is changed.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is associated with worse outcomes. We assessed the impact of CKD on guideline directed coronary revascularization and outcomes among STEMI patients. The Nationwide Inpatient Sample dataset from 2012-2014 was used to identify patients with STEMI using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes. Patients were categorized as non-CKD, CKD without dialysis, and CKD with dialysis (CKD-HD). Outcomes were revascularization, death and acute renal failure requiring dialysis (ARFD). A total of 534,845 were included (88.9% non-CKD; 9.6% CKD without dialysis, and 1.5% CKD-HD). PCI was performed in 77.4% non-CKD, 56.2% CKD without dialysis, and 48% CKD-HD patients (p < 0.0001). In-hospital mortality and ARFD were significantly higher in CKD patients (16.5% and 40.6%) compared with non-CKD patients (7.12% and 7.17%) (p < 0.0001). In-hospital mortality was significantly lower in patients treated revascularization compared with patients treated medically (non-CKD: adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.280, p < 0.0001; CKD without dialysis: aOR 0.39, p < 0.0001; CKD-HD: aOR 0.48, p < 0.0001). CKD was associated with higher length of hospital stay and cost (5.86 +/- 13.97, 7.57 +/- 26.06 and 3.99 +/- 11.09 days; p < 0.0001; $25,696 +/- $63,024, $35,666 +/- $104,940 and $23,264 +/- $49,712; p < 0.0001 in non-CKD, CKD without dialysis and CKD-HD patients respectively). In conclusion, CKD patients with STEMI receive significantly less PCI compared with patients without CKD. Coronary revascularization for STEMI in CKD patients was associated with lower mortality compared to medical management. The presence of CKD in patients with STEMI is associated with higher mortality and ARFD, prolonged hospital stay and higher hospital cost. (C) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Background: There are multiple risk factors for heart failure, but contemporary temporal trends according to sex, socioeconomic status, and ethnicity are unknown. Methods: Using a national UK gener...

Background Complex high-risk and indicated revascularization using percutaneous coronary intervention (CHIP-PCI) is an emerging concept that is poorly studied. Objective To define temporal changes in CHIP-PCI volumes, and the relationship between operator CHIP-PCI volume and patient outcomes. Methods and Results Data were analyzed on all CHIP-PCI procedures undertaken for stable angina in England and Wales between 2007 and 2014. Operator volume data was available for 2012-14. CHIP-PCI was defined by patient characteristics (age 80years, left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction <30%, previous CABG, or chronic renal failure) and/or by procedural characteristics (left main PCI, chronic total occlusion PCI, LV support, use of rotational atherectomy or laser atherectomy). CHIP-PCI as a percentage of total PCI increased from 28.1% in 2007 to 36.2% in 2014 (P < .001). Between 2012 and 2014, a total of 30,268 CHIP-PCI cases were performed. Total operator volume varied from 1 to 580 cases with median total operator volume of 29 cases. Higher operator volumes were associated with a greater degree of patient comorbidity and increasing procedural complexity. After adjustment for baseline difference, in-hospital major bleeding (P < .001 for trend), access site complications (P < .001) and coronary perforation (P = .002) were associated with increasing operator CHIP-PCI volumes. However, the frequency of in-hospital death (P = .394) and 12-month mortality (P = .638) were similar across the volume quartiles. Higher volumes quartiles were associated with a greater likelihood of same day discharge (P < .001). Conclusions CHIP-PCI cases are an increasingly large population in contemporary PCI practice. Higher operator volumes were not associated with improved 12-month survival. Condensed abstract Data were analyzed on all complex high-risk and indicated revascularization using percutaneous coronary intervention (CHIP-PCI) procedures in England and Wales between 2007 and 2014. CHIP-PCI as a percentage of total PCI increased from 28.1% in 2007 to 36.2% in 2014 (P < .001). Median total operator volume was 29 cases with higher volumes associated with more patient comorbidity and increasing procedural complexity. In-hospital major bleeding (P < .001 for trend), access site complications (P < .001) and coronary perforation (P = .002) all associated with increasing operator CHIP-PCI volumes. However, trends for in-hospital death (P = .394), and 12-month mortality (P = .638) were similar across the volume quartiles.

Background: There are multiple risk factors for heart failure, but contemporary temporal trends according to sex, socioeconomic status, and ethnicity are unknown. Methods: Using a national UK general practice database linked to hospitalizations (1998–2017), 108 638 incident heart failure patients were identified. Differences in risk factors among patient groups adjusted for sociodemographic factors and age-adjusted temporal trends were investigated using logistic and linear regression. Results: Over time, a 5.3 year (95% CI, 5.2–5.5) age difference between men and women remained. Women had higher blood pressure, body mass index, and cholesterol than men ( P <0.0001). Ischemic heart disease prevalence increased for all to 2006 before reducing in women by 0.5% per annum, reaching 42.7% (95% CI, 41.7–43.6), but not in men, remaining at 57.7% (95% CI, 56.9–58.6; interaction P =0.002). Diabetes mellitus prevalence increased more in men than in women (interaction P <0.0001). Age between the most deprived (74.6 years [95% CI, 74.1–75.1]) and most affluent (79.9 [95% CI, 79.6–80.2]) diverged (interaction P <0.0001), generating a 5-year gap. The most deprived had significantly higher annual increases in comorbidity numbers (+0.14 versus +0.11), body mass index (+0.14 versus +0.11 kg/m 2 ), and lower smoking reductions (−1.2% versus −1.7%) than the most affluent. Ethnicity trend differences were insignificant, but South Asians were overall 6 years and the black group 9 years younger than whites. South Asians had more ischemic heart disease (+16.5% [95% CI, 14.3–18.6]), hypertension (+12.5% [95% CI, 10.5–14.3]), and diabetes mellitus (+24.3% [95% CI, 22.0–26.6]), and the black group had more hypertension (+12.3% [95% CI, 9.7–14.8]) and diabetes mellitus (+13.1% [95% CI, 10.1–16.0]) but lower ischemic heart disease (−10.6% [95% CI, −13.6 to −7.6]) than the white group. Conclusions: Population groups show distinct risk factor trend differences, indicating the need for contemporary tailored prevention programs.

Background Guidelines recommend heart team discussion and coronary artery bypass graft consideration in patients with proximal left anterior descending ( LAD ) artery stenosis. Evidence suggests that outcomes of proximal LAD angioplasty might not differ from treatment of nonproximal LAD locations. We aim to determine clinical outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the proximal LAD segment in comparison with nonproximal LAD angioplasty, using a thin‐strut drug‐eluting stent. Methods and Results In this analysis of the e‐Ultimaster registry, patients undergoing angioplasty in the proximal LAD territory were compared with those treated in nonproximal LAD locations. Multivariate analysis and propensity score were used to adjust for differences among the groups. The primary outcome was target lesion failure: a composite of cardiac death, target‐lesion–related myocardial infarction, and/or clinically driven target lesion revascularization at 1‐year follow‐up. Of the 17 805 patients (mean age, 64.2±11; 76% male), 5452 (30.6%) underwent proximal LAD and 12 353 (69.4%) nonproximal LAD percutaneous coronary intervention. Patients in the proximal LAD group had more multivessel disease (48.7% versus 43.5%; P <0.001) and 2‐fold more bifurcations lesions (18.8% versus 9.2%; P <0.0001). After propensity‐weighted adjustment, target lesion failure did not differ between the groups (3.3% versus 2.9%; P =0.17 for proximal LAD versus nonproximal LAD angioplasty, respectively). In multivariate analysis, proximal LAD treatment was not an independent predictor of target lesion failure (odds ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.88–1.31; P =0.48). Conclusions At 1‐year follow‐up, patients had similar clinical outcomes independent of stenting location, questioning whether proximal LAD treatment should be regarded differently from stenting in any other coronary artery territory.

Peripheral vascular disease (PVD) is common in patients referred for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We sought to investigate the impact of PVD on patients who underwent TAVI. Using data from the National Inpatient Sample database 2011 and 2014, we identified patients who had undergone TAVI. We studied the clinical characteristics and procedural outcomes in patients with PVD who underwent TAVI compared with those patients without PVD using propensity score matching score matching. Results: A total of 42,215 patients underwent TAVI; of which 1,388 patients were matched using propensity score matched scores to 694 in each (PVD vs no PVD) patients. The population had a mean age of 81 years old and 55.8% were of female gender. African-Americans constituted 4.3%. PVD patients who underwent TAVI were found to have higher rates of vascular complications (11.8% vs 5.9 % p <0.001) compared with non-PVD patients and tended to have higher mortality (5.5% vs 3.6%, p = 0.121) and post-TAVI bleeding (13.5% vs 12% p = 0.143). In conclusion, PVD patients have higher in-hospital mortality and higher incidence of in-hospital overall complications compared with patients who have no PVD. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

OBJECTIVES:Variation in hospital resource allocations across weekdays and weekends have led to studies of the 'weekend effect' for ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), heart failure (HF) and stroke. However, few studies have explored the 'weekend effect' on unplanned readmission. We aimed to investigate 30-day unplanned readmissions and processes of care across weekend and weekday hospitalisations for STEMI, NSTEMI, HF and stroke. DESIGN:We grouped hospitalisations for STEMI, NSTEMI, HF or stroke into weekday or weekend admissions. Multivariable adjusted ORs for binary outcomes across weekend versus weekday (reference) groups were estimated using logistic regression. SETTING:We included all non-elective hospitalisations for STEMI, NSTEMI, HF or stroke, which were recorded in the US Nationwide Readmissions Database between 2010 and 2014. PARTICIPANTS:The analysis sample included 659 906 hospitalisations for STEMI, 1 420 600 hospitalisations for NSTEMI, 3 027 699 hospitalisations for HF, and 2 574 168 hospitalisations for stroke. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:The primary outcome was unplanned 30-day readmission. As secondary outcomes, we considered length of stay and the following processes of care: coronary angiography, primary percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass graft, thrombolysis, brain scan/imaging, thrombectomy, echocardiography and cardiac resynchronisation therapy/implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. RESULTS:Unplanned 30-day readmission rates were 11.0%, 15.1%, 23.0% and 10.9% for STEMI, NSTEMI, HF and stroke, respectively. Weekend hospitalisations for HF were associated with a statistically significant but modest increase in 30-day readmissions (OR of 1.045, 95% CI 1.033 to 1.058). Weekend hospitalisation for STEMI, NSTEMI or stroke was not associated with increased risk of 30-day readmission. CONCLUSION:There was no clinically meaningful evidence against the supposition that weekend and weekday hospitalisations have the same 30-day unplanned readmissions. Thirty-day readmission rates were high, especially for HF, which has implications for service provision. Strategies to reduce readmission rates should be explored, regardless of day of hospitalisation.

The aim of this study was to describe the rates and causes of unplanned readmissions at different time periods following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The rates and causes of readmission at different time periods after PCI remain incompletely elucidated. Patients undergoing PCI between 2010 and 2014 in the U.S. Nationwide Readmission Database were evaluated for the rates, causes, predictors, and costs of unplanned readmission between 0 and 7 days, 8 and 30 days, 31 and 90 days, and 91 and 180 days after index discharge. This analysis included 2,412,000 patients; 2.5% were readmitted between 0 and 7 days, 7.6% between 8 and 30 days, 8.9% between 31 and 90 days, and 8.0% between 91 and 180 days (cumulative rates 2.5%, 9.9%, 18.0%, and 24.8%, respectively). The majority of readmissions during each time period were due to noncardiac causes (53.1% to 59.6%). Nonspecific chest pain was the most common identifiable noncardiac cause for readmission during each time period (14.2% to 22.7% of noncardiac readmissions). Coronary artery disease including angina was the most common cardiac cause for readmission during each time period (37.4% to 39.3% of cardiac readmissions). The second most common cardiac cause for readmission was acute myocardial infarction between 0 and 7 days (27.6% of cardiac readmissions) and heart failure during all subsequent time periods (22.2% to 23.7% of cardiac readmissions). Approximately 25% of patients following PCI have unplanned readmissions within 6 months. Causes of readmission depend on the timing at which they are assessed, with noncardiovascular causes becoming more important at longer time points.

Life expectancy in the United States has increased due to advances in health care. Despite increased utilization of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), octogenarian patients are less likely to be referred to the catheterization laboratory for coronary interventions. This is in part due to multiple patient co-morbidities and lack of established guidelines. We examined in-hospital clinical outcomes of octogenarian and nonoctogenarian patients who underwent PCI in the United States. Using the National Inpatient Sampling database, we identified all adult patients who are older than 18 years and underwent PCI. Patient were stratified by age into 2 groups, >= 80 years old and <80 years old and in-hospital adverse outcome rates were determined. A total of 11,056,559 patients underwent PCI between the years of 2002 and 2014 and 1,544,563 patients were >= 80 years old (14%). After multivariable adjustment, patients who are >= 80 years old had higher in-hospital mortality (3.3% vs 1.3%, adjusted Odds Ratio, 1.624; 95% confidence interval, 1.602 to 1.647, p <0.0001) and longer length of stay (median length of stay days 3, range 2 to 8 days vs median 2 days, range 1 to 4 days) (p <0.0001). Patients >= 80 years old had a higher rate of cardiopulmonary complications, postprocedural stroke, acute kidney injury, postprocedural thromboembolic complications, and hemorrhage requiring transfusion. There was no difference in vascular complications between the 2 groups. In conclusion, octogenarians who underwent PCI were at increased risk for in-hospital mortality and morbidity compared with nonoctogenarians. The decision to proceed with PCI in this patient population should be individualized, taking into consideration known risk factors and patient's wishes. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier Inc.

BACKGROUND:The evidence base for coronary perforation occurring during percutaneous coronary intervention in patients presenting with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS-PCI) is limited and the specific role of acute pharmacology in its clinical presentation unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS:Using the BCIS PCI database, data were analysed on all ACS-PCI procedures performed in England and Wales between 2007 and 2014. Multiple regressions were used to identify predictors of coronary perforation and its association with outcomes. Propensity score matching was used to evaluate the association between differing P2Y12 inhibitors or glycoprotein inhibitors (GPI) and CP. During 270,329 ACS-PCI procedures, 1013 coronary perforations were recorded (0.37%) with a stable annual incidence. In multiple regression analysis, covariates associated with increased frequency of coronary perforation included age, female gender, CTO intervention, number and length of stents used, and rotational atherectomy use, whilst differing P2Y12 inhibitors were not predictive. Using propensity score matching, use of a GPI was independently associated with tamponade (OR 1.50, [1.08-2.06], p = 0.014). The adjusted odds ratios for all clinical outcomes were adversely affected by coronary perforation. CONCLUSIONS:Coronary perforation is an infrequent event during ACS-PCI but is closely associated with adverse clinical outcomes. GPI use was associated with higher rates of tamponade.

Using the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) database, temporal trends, predictors, and outcomes of radial access (RA) versus femoral access (FA) for unprotected left main stem percutaneous coronary intervention (LMS-PCI) were studied. Data on arterial access site for LMS-PCI are poorly defined. Data were analyzed from 19,482 LMS-PCI procedures performed in England and Wales between 2007 and 2014. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify predictors of access site choice and its association with outcomes. The frequency of FA use fell from 77.7% in 2007 to 31.7% in 2014 (p < 0.001 for trend). In the most contemporary study years (2012 to 2014), the strongest associates of FA use for unprotected LMS-PCI were renal disease, PCI for restenosis, chronic total occlusion intervention, and female sex. Use of intravascular imaging and chronic anticoagulation were associated with a higher likelihood of RA use. Complexity of the PCI procedure in the RA cohort increased significantly during the study period. Length of stay was shorter (2.6 ± 9.2 vs. 3.6 ± 9.0; p < 0.001) and same day discharge greater (43.0% vs. 26.6%; p < 0.001) with RA use. After propensity matching, RA use was associated with significant reductions in in-hospital events including access site arterial complications, major bleeding, and major adverse cardiovascular events. Conversion to RA for LMS-PCI was associated with similar reductions in the whole patient cohort. RA use was not associated with lower 12-month mortality. In contemporary practice, the radial artery is the predominant access site for unprotected LMS-PCI, and its use is associated with shorter length of stay, less vascular complications, and less major bleeding than femoral access.