Background: Bariatric surgery is performed safely in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) patients with minimal fibrosis (stage 1–2). However, the safety and potential benefits of bariatric surgery for NAFLD with advanced fibrosis (stage 3–4) remain unclear. This study was designed to compare the safety and efficacy of bariatric surgery in patients with biopsy proven advanced fibrosis to those with minimal fibrosis. Methods: All patients who underwent bariatric surgery between 2005 and 2014 and had evidence of NAFLD with fibrosis score 3–4 (advanced fibrosis) based on the staging system defined by Kleiner et al. on intraoperative liver biopsy were included and compared with patients who had fibrosis score 1–2 (minimal fibrosis). The groups were compared for length of hospital stay after bariatric surgery and incidence of postoperative complications over a follow-up period of 1 year. An improvement in hepatic function tests before and 1 year after surgery was used as a parameter to evaluate for NAFLD improvement. Results: Ninety-nine patients with F3-4 (group 1) and 198 patients with F1-2 (group 2) were included. Mean age (51.9 vs 50.1 years) and body mass index (46.4 vs 46.5 kg m −2 ) were similar in the two groups. Median serum aspartate aminotransferase (43 vs 30 U l −1 ; normal 10–40 U l −1 ) and alanine aminotransferase (40.5 vs 34 U l −1 ; normal 10–50 U l −1 ) were significantly higher in group 1 and improved 1 year after surgery. Median length of hospital stay after surgery was higher in group 1 than that in group 2 (4 days vs 3 days; P -value=0.002). The proportion of patients developing postoperative complications over 1 year was similar in both groups (36.4% vs 32.8%; P -value=0.54). Conclusions: Advanced fibrosis does not increase the risk of developing postoperative complications in medically optimized patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Improvement in serum transaminase levels suggests a reduction in hepatic necroinflammatory activity following bariatric surgery.
BACKGROUND:Bariatric surgery is a rapidly growing field. Advances in surgical technologies and techniques have raised concerns about patient safety. Bariatric surgeons and programs are under increased scrutiny from regulatory agencies, insurers, and public health officials to provide high quality and safe care for bariatric patients at all phases of care.METHODS:During the 2009 annual meeting of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES), a panel of experts convened to provide updated information on patient safety and best practices in bariatric surgery. The following article is a summary of this panel presentation.RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS:Weight loss surgery is a field that is evolving and adapting to multiple external pressures. Safety concerns along with increasing public scrutiny have led to a systematic approach to defining best practices, creating standards of care, and identifying mechanisms to ensure that patients consistently receive the best and most effective care possible. In many ways, bariatric surgery and multidisciplinary bariatric surgery programs may serve as a model for other programs and surgical specialties in the near future.
Endoluminal and transgastric procedures are evolving concepts that combine the skills and techniques of flexible endoscopy with minimally invasive surgery. Precisely how this technology and skill set will be applied in the field of general surgery is not yet known, but the treatment of obesity with an endoluminal or transgastric procedure holds great promise. As the demand for bariatric surgery increases, efforts will be directed toward developing less morbid and less costly treatment options that can provide substantial weight loss and resolution of comorbid conditions. Natural orifice bariatric procedures may include short-term weight loss in preparation for a definitive laparoscopic procedure, revisional procedures to reduce stoma or pouch size or repair fistulas, or primary therapy that provides durable weight loss. The latter application will undoubtedly appeal to patients and referring physicians if it can be performed as an outpatient procedure with significantly less morbidity than a laparoscopic procedure. Early preclinical and clinical work has been published in this area, but many technical obstacles must be overcome before a primary endoluminal or transgastric bariatric procedure can be offered. This article reviews the endoluminal and transgastric technology currently available, the endoluminal procedures currently performed, and the future of these technologies with respect to bariatric surgery.
The surgical treatment of obesity in the high-risk, high-body-mass-index (BMI) (>60) patient remains a challenge. Major morbidity and mortality in these patients can approach 38% and 6%, respectively. In an effort to achieve more favorable outcomes, we have employed a two-stage approach to such high-risk patients. This study evaluates our initial outcomes with this technique.
Ghrelin is a potent appetite stimulator, mainly synthesized in the stomach but also made in the brain. Paradoxically, obese subjects have lower plasma ghrelin than lean subjects and increase their weight in spite of low ghrelin levels. We hypothesize that central, and not peripheral ghrelin, is primarily responsible for overeating in humans. The aim of this study was to determine hypothalamic ghrelin levels in lean vs obese subjects. We collected anterior hypothalamus from lean and obese patients at the time of autopsy, and Western blots and semiquantitative RT-PCR for ghrelin and neuropeptide Y (NPY) were carried out. Our results showed that ghrelin expression was significantly higher in the hypothalamus of obese subjects compared to lean ones. This finding correlates with similar increases in NPY in the obese group. Ghrelin and NPY mRNA levels followed the same trend and were significantly higher in the hypothalamus in obese compared to lean subjects, suggesting a central origin for the increased protein content in the obese subjects. In conclusion, obesity in humans is associated with elevated central ghrelin. This data questions the significance of the role of peripheral ghrelin in the regulation of appetite in humans and suggests an important role for central ghrelin in the pathogenesis of obesity in humans.