Dynamic whole body (DWB) FDG PET has become available with the recent introduction of the "flow motion" package by Siemens which offers fully automated generation of parametric images of the metabolic uptake rate K[m]. While this approach is superior to SUV-based quantification, it requires substantially more scan time and reduces patient throughput. On the other hand, the tumor to blood standard uptake ratio (SUR) has outperformed SUV in several clinical studies, which is attributed to a very high correlation between SUR and K[m]. However, direct evidence for this correlation is scarce. Our study compares K[sur], the SUR-derived "static" estimate of K[m], with the Patlak-derived K[m].

Summary Aim: The effect of beta blockers (BB) on myocardial imaging has been studied in several SPECT and PET studies with divergent results concerning perfusion and impact on diagnostic accuracy. The present study evaluated the effect of BB withdrawal on virtual SPECT studies modeled from quantitative PET perfusion scans. Patients, methods: Data from 20 CAD patients scheduled for adenosine 13N-ammonia imaging with and without BB were considered. Modeling the uptake characteristics of 99mTc-MIBI, all parametric stress PET polarmaps were transferred to virtual 20-segment SPECT polarmaps. The SPECT studies were categorized with a 5-point score and read to assess the effect of the BB withdrawal on scan result and interpretation. Results: The SPECT analysis revealed a mean score of 6.0 ± 4.7 with, and of 5.9 ± 4.5 without BB (p = 0.84). In 260 (74.9%) segments the scores were equal in both conditions. Without BB a downstaging was recorded in 44 segments (12.7%), an upstaging in 43 segments (12.4%). An essentially different interpretation (shift from medical therapy recommendation to angiography) was recorded in one patient. In six cases the interpretation differed mildly. Conclusion: In the majority of patients studied, scan results and interpretation remain unchanged after discontinuation of the BB. Nevertheless, the segmental scan results are not uniformly affected. The recommendation to stop BBs prior to stress testing in order to ensure the highest MBF remains advisable. If temporary BB withdrawal is unfeasible due to contraindications, a tight clinical schedule, or because a patient forgot to withhold the BB, it is appropriate to perform adenosine stress testing according to the results of this study.

Regrettably the original version of the above article contained errors in Table 2 and wrong values in the text. The corrected table is presented here and the values which have been corrected now appear in bold text. Page 1223 abstract Global MBF showed an increase from 180.2 ± 59.9 to 193.6 ± 60.8 mL minute/100 g (P = .002) after beta blocker withdrawal. Page 1225 Mean systolic and mean diastolic blood pressure during adenosine were nearly identical (P = .77 and P = .79) with and without beta blocker. Mean heart rate and mean RPP during adenosine significantly increased after beta blocker withdrawal by 15.2% ± 17% (P = .001) and 16.2% ± 23% (P = .004), respectively. Page 1226 The data are listed in Table 2, lower third. Global MBF showed a significant increase by 7.4% ± 10% (P = .002) after beta blocker withdrawal. The individual data are depicted in Figure 1. All but three patients had a lower global MBF without beta blocker than with. The segmental MBF values (Figure 2) demonstrated a strong correlation over the entire range of perfusion values. The average effect was a slight perfusion shift of about 1015 mL minute-1/100 g in the range of 100-300 mL minute-1/100 g. The mCR under adenosine declined by 8.1% ± 11% (P = .038) and the normalized RPP by 16.2% ± 21% (P = .004) after betablocker discontinuation. Table 2 Hemodynamic response under adenosine, perfusion, and left-ventricular function

717 Learning Objectives: After reviewing this presentation, attendees will be able to: 1. Understand how CT data can be classified and visualized with transfer functions. 2. Describe how functional PET data and anatomic CT data can be displayed in the same 3D scene. Abstract (summary): Recent advances in CT technology offer a non-invasive way for revealing the degree and location of stenosis of the coronary arteries. PET can be used to quantify physiologic processes, including myocardial perfusion. The combination of anatomic and physiologic information offers new possibilities in diagnosis of coronary artery disease, no matter if the data comes from stand-alone devices or from PET/CT. The software currently supplied by the vendors of imaging devices has two major limitations. In CT, tools for visualization of the coronary arteries exist, but segmented data usually cannot be exported in a format that allows further processing. In PET, only static data can be used for coregistration, sacrificing valuable diagnostic information. In our software, we use two dimensional transfer functions to highlight clinical relevant details from the CT study, i.e. the coronary arteries, without the interference of other anatomical structures. Attenuation coefficient and gradient magnitude are displayed in a 2D histogram on which different filters can be defined. Direct volume rendering is used to show the effect of the filters in real-time. PET and CT currently are co-registered manually. A PET uptake image (e.g. the last frame of a dynamic study using N-13-ammonia) is used for coregistration. A converter written in MATLAB transforms the functional data derived from compartment modeling back into anatomical space, where it can be added to the scene-graph. Our software runs on commercial personal computers with powerful graphics cards (GPU) and thus is independent from specific vendors of clinical imaging devices. This also offers the possibility to introduce the software into the clinician’s office.

UNLABELLED:(18)F-FDG PET is an important diagnostic tool for detecting myocardial viability in patients with coronary artery disease. In combination with perfusion scanning, (18)F-FDG PET allows differentiation between reversibly and irreversibly damaged myocardium and selection of patients likely to benefit from revascularization. Viability PET is usually performed in two-dimensional (2D) mode. Taking into account the rising number of three-dimensional (3D)-only scanners, a validation of 3D acquisition is required.METHODS:Twenty-one patients with coronary artery disease referred for (18)F-FDG PET underwent an imaging protocol of nongated 2D (2D-NG) and gated 2D (2D-G) acquisitions for 15 min each, followed by 3D gated acquisitions for 10 min (3D-10) and 5 min (3D-5), using an ECAT Exact HR+ scanner. Results were analyzed using a 20-segment polar map in terms of activity concentration (Bq/mL), viability (50% uptake threshold), regional activity distribution, visual assessment of viability based on a 3-point rating scale, and left ventricular ejection fraction.RESULTS:Activity concentration measured in each segment with 2D-G, 3D-10, and 3D-5 showed a good linear correlation with 2D-NG. Quantitative viability assessment with 3D-5 gave a sensitivity of 84% and a specificity of 98%, compared with 2D-NG. No differences in regional activity distribution and visual viability assessment were found between the various protocols. Left ventricular ejection fractions obtained with 3D-10 and 3D-5 showed a good linear correlation with those measured with 2D-G.CONCLUSION:An ECG-gated 3D imaging protocol gave results comparable to those of 2D acquisition with regard to absolute and regional myocardial activity distribution, left ventricular function, and visual viability assessment. Sensitivity for viability assessment with a 50% uptake threshold was significantly less with 3D, but specificity was maintained. This protocol delivers a clinical performance nearly equivalent to that of 2D acquisition.

UNLABELLED:In cardiac SPECT, specificity is significantly affected by artifacts due to photon absorption. As the success of attenuation correction depends mainly on high-quality attenuation maps, SPECT low-dose CT devices are promising. We wanted to evaluate the usefulness of a SPECT low-dose CT device in myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. For the evaluation of attenuation correction systems, primarily comparisons with coronary angiography are used. Because the comparison of a method showing myocardial perfusion with an investigation displaying the morphology of vessels yields some difficulties, we chose perfusion PET with (13)N-ammonia as the reference method.METHODS:We prospectively analyzed 23 patients (6 women, 17 men) with known or suspected coronary artery disease. Rest studies and studies under pharmacologic stress with adenosine were performed. After simultaneous injection of (13)N-ammonia and (99m)Tc-sestamibi, a dynamic PET acquisition was started. The SPECT study was performed about 2 h later. Based on 20-segment polar maps, SPECT with and without attenuation correction was compared with PET-derived perfusion values and ammonia uptake values. The PET uptake images were also smoothed to adjust their resolution to the resolution of the SPECT images.RESULTS:The concordance of SPECT and PET studies was improved after attenuation correction. The main effect was seen in the inferior wall. Especially in the apex and anterolateral wall, there were differences between SPECT and PET studies not attributable to attenuation artifacts. Because these differences diminished after smoothing of the PET studies, they might be due to partial-volume effects caused by the inferior resolution of the SPECT images.CONCLUSION:The x-ray-derived attenuation correction leads to SPECT images that represent myocardial perfusion more accurately than nonattenuation-corrected SPECT images. The benefit of the method is seen primarily in the inferior wall. The low resolution of the SPECT system may lead to artifacts due to partial-volume effects. This phenomenon must be considered when perfusion PET is used as a reference method to investigate the effect of attenuation correction.

Attenuation correction increases the specificity of myocardial perfusion SPECT. However, we noticed an unusually high number of scans with defects only visible in the attenuation-corrected images. We suspected these to be false positive readings. Visual inspection using the supplied software suggested mismatch in the ventrodorsal (Y-) direction between SPECT images and transmission maps as an explanation. As the fusion tool only allows for a coarse grading, we wrote software to quantify the mismatch. A phantom study was done to verify that the observed mismatch can cause the defect patterns visible in the attenuation-corrected images. 25 patients who showed the most pronounced artifact were chosen for re-alignment and re-evaluation. Overall, the defects in the attenuation-corrected images got less intense (15/25) or even vanished (6/25) after re-aligning emissions images and transmission maps. In response to our complaints, the vendor replaced the support rollers which should prevent the bed from deflecting with a re-engineered, more robust version. No more clinically relevant artefacts were observed after this modification. Evaluation of another 28 probably-normal patients showed the mean mismatch between emission and transmission scan to be significantly reduced. We conclude that great care has to be taken to ensure correct alignment of the scans even in a dual-modality imaging device. Bed deflection can be a major source for misalignment and artifacts.

UNLABELLED:Nonuniform soft-tissue attenuation affects the diagnostic accuracy of SPECT in myocardial perfusion imaging. The attenuation map required for attenuation correction can be acquired using x-ray tomography (CT). Frequent findings in attenuation-corrected images are defects in the apical and anterior myocardial wall. We assume that these are artifacts produced by misalignment of SPECT images and the attenuation map.METHODS:One hundred forty patients underwent myocardial perfusion imaging with 99mTc-methoxyisobutylisonitrile. Twenty-seven of 140 showed pronounced defects in the apical or anterior wall only after CT-based attenuation correction. SPECT and corresponding CT slices were examined for misalignment in the ventrodorsal direction (y-direction) visually and by threshold-based delineation of the body surface. Mismatched studies were realigned and image reconstruction and analysis were redone. The effect of the correction was assessed visually and by semiquantitative analysis based on a 20-segment model using 4D-MSPECT.RESULTS:In 15 of 27 patients, the improved coregistration led to smaller and less-pronounced defects in the regions mentioned. In 6 of 27 patients, former defects were judged as normal. No improvement was seen in only 4 patients. In these 4 subjects, the mismatch in the y-direction was <1 pixel (7 mm), and visual inspection suggested a coincident mismatch in the craniocaudal direction. In 2 cases, coregistration was not possible because the body outline extended beyond the CT field of view. Semiquantitative analysis revealed a significant increase of the relative uptake in the apex; in the apical segments of the anterior, septal, and inferior wall; and in the mid-anterior and mid-anteroseptal segment. Basal segments of the anterolateral, lateral, and inferolateral wall and the middle inferolateral segment showed a significant decrease of relative uptake.CONCLUSION:Misalignment in the y-direction between SPECT and the attenuation map can lead to artifacts in the apical, septal, and anterior wall, which will appear as defects. It also can cause overcorrection in the basal inferior and lateral segments. There is evidence that mismatches along the other directions may have a similar effect. The coregistration of SPECT and the attenuation map needs to be verified for every patient, even when using integrated dual-modality imaging devices.