The effect of a series of antacid materials upon uropepsin output was evaluated in a group of 15 normal adults. The antacids, namely, sodium bicarbonate, calcium carbonate, magnesium hydroxide, hydrated magnesium aluminate-sulfate activated (HMAS), and bismuth subsalicylate, were administered on the comparable basis of acid consuming power (ACP). Urine specimens, both control and test, were evaluated for total proteolytic activity. Statistical analysis of the results showed all test materials, except calcium carbonate, to have elicited significant decreases (P < 0.05) in uropepsin excretion. The effect of a series of antacid materials upon uropepsin output was evaluated in a group of 15 normal adults. The antacids, namely, sodium bicarbonate, calcium carbonate, magnesium hydroxide, hydrated magnesium aluminate-sulfate activated (HMAS), and bismuth subsalicylate, were administered on the comparable basis of acid consuming power (ACP). Urine specimens, both control and test, were evaluated for total proteolytic activity. Statistical analysis of the results showed all test materials, except calcium carbonate, to have elicited significant decreases (P < 0.05) in uropepsin excretion.

Journal of Food ScienceVolume 22, Issue 6 p. 572-589 USE OF HIGH-VOLTAGE CATHODE RAYS TO DESTROY BACTERIA OF THE SALMONELLA GROUP IN WHOLE EGG SOLIDS, EGG YOLK SOLIDS, AND FROZEN EGG YOLKabc R. C. BROGLE, R. C. BROGLE Department of Food Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MassachusettsSearch for more papers by this authorJ. T. R. NICKERSON, J. T. R. NICKERSON Department of Food Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MassachusettsSearch for more papers by this authorB. E. PROCTOR, B. E. PROCTOR Department of Food Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MassachusettsSearch for more papers by this authorA. PYNE, A. PYNE Department of Food Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MassachusettsSearch for more papers by this authorC. CAMPBELL, C. CAMPBELL Department of Food Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MassachusettsSearch for more papers by this authorS. CHARM, S. CHARM Department of Food Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MassachusettsSearch for more papers by this authorHANS LINEWEAVER, HANS LINEWEAVER Western Utilization Research and Development Division, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Albany 10, CaliforniaSearch for more papers by this author R. C. BROGLE, R. C. BROGLE Department of Food Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MassachusettsSearch for more papers by this authorJ. T. R. NICKERSON, J. T. R. NICKERSON Department of Food Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MassachusettsSearch for more papers by this authorB. E. PROCTOR, B. E. PROCTOR Department of Food Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MassachusettsSearch for more papers by this authorA. PYNE, A. PYNE Department of Food Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MassachusettsSearch for more papers by this authorC. CAMPBELL, C. CAMPBELL Department of Food Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MassachusettsSearch for more papers by this authorS. CHARM, S. CHARM Department of Food Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MassachusettsSearch for more papers by this authorHANS LINEWEAVER, HANS LINEWEAVER Western Utilization Research and Development Division, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Albany 10, CaliforniaSearch for more papers by this author First published: November 1957 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1957.tb17518.xCitations: 10 a Presented at the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Institute of Food Technologists, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, May 14, 1957. b Contribution No. 312, Department of Food Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass. c A report of work done under a contract with the U. S. Department of Agriculture and authorized by the Research and Marketing Act of 1946. The contract was supervised by the Western Utilization Research and Development Division of the Agricultural Research Service. AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditWechat Citing Literature Volume22, Issue6November 1957Pages 572-589 RelatedInformation