DNA sliding clamps are essential for processive DNA synthesis in all domains of life and are loaded by ATP-dependent clamp loaders that recognize recessed 3' ends. How clamp loaders function at nicks and small single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) gaps-common DNA repair intermediates-remains unclear. Here, we show that the bacterial E. coli DnaX clamp loader uses a mechanism distinct from its eukaryotic counterpart. Whereas eukaryotic replication factor C (RFC) unwinds DNA at the recessed 3' end and stabilizes the 5'-dsDNA (double-stranded DNA) at a shoulder site, the bacterial DnaX-complex neither unwinds DNA nor stably binds the 5'-dsDNA in vitro. Instead, cryo-EM structures reveal that the β-clamp contains a conserved external DNA-binding site that bends gapped DNA by ∼150°, promoting insertion of 3'-dsDNA into the clamp. This DNA-bending mechanism enables efficient β-clamp loading at nicks and small gaps and reveals a distinct bacterial strategy likely important for DNA repair.
DNA sliding clamps are used by the replication machines of all organisms, from bacteria to human. These clamps do not self-assemble onto DNA but require a multiprotein ATPase clamp loader that recognizes a DNA 3′-recessed end to open and close sliding clamps onto it. We find here that the mechanism of clamp loading onto small ssDNA gaps is profoundly different between bacteria and eukaryotes. The eukaryotic RFC clamp loader unwinds dsDNA from the 3′-recessed end to widen the ssDNA gap and also binds the 5′-recessed DNA end at an external shoulder site. In contrast, the bacterial DnaX-complex neither unwinds DNA nor stably binds DNA at the shoulder site in vitro. Instead, the bacterial β-clamp has evolved an external DNA binding site that enables the DnaX-complex to sharply bend a gapped DNA by 150° to insert it into the clamp. Small DNA gaps are frequently associated with DNA damage, and the clamps loaded at these sites likely function in DNA repair. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. National Institute of General Medical Sciences, https://ror.org/04q48ey07, GM115809, GM131754 Howard Hughes Medical Institute, https://ror.org/006w34k90 Van Andel Institute, https://ror.org/00wm07d60
During DNA replication, the proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) clamps are loaded onto primed sites for each Okazaki fragment synthesis by the AAA + heteropentamer replication factor C (RFC). PCNA encircling duplex DNA is quite stable and is removed from DNA by the dedicated clamp unloader Elg1-RFC. Here, we show the cryo-EM structure of Elg1-RFC in various states with PCNA. The structures reveal essential features of Elg1-RFC that explain how it is dedicated to PCNA unloading. Specifically, Elg1 contains two external loops that block opening of the Elg1-RFC complex for DNA binding, and an “Elg1 plug” domain that fills the central DNA binding chamber, thereby reinforcing the exclusive PCNA unloading activity of Elg1-RFC. Elg1-RFC was capable of unloading PCNA using non-hydrolyzable AMP-PNP. Both RFC and Elg1-RFC could remove PCNA from covalently closed circular DNA, indicating that PCNA unloading occurs by a mechanism that is distinct from PCNA loading. Implications for the PCNA unloading mechanism are discussed.
The proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) clamp encircles DNA to hold DNA polymerases (Pols) to DNA for processivity. The Ctf18-RFC PCNA loader, a replication factor C (RFC) variant, is specific to the leading-strand Pol (Polε). We reveal here the underlying mechanism of Ctf18-RFC specificity to Polε using cryo-electron microscopy and biochemical studies. We found that both Ctf18-RFC and Polε contain specific structural features that direct PCNA loading onto DNA. Unlike other clamp loaders, Ctf18-RFC has a disordered ATPase associated with a diverse cellular activities (AAA+) motor that requires Polε to bind and stabilize it for efficient PCNA loading. In addition, Ctf18-RFC can pry prebound Polε off of DNA, then load PCNA onto DNA and transfer the PCNA-DNA back to Polε. These elements in both Ctf18-RFC and Polε provide specificity in loading PCNA onto DNA for Polε.
DNA replication in all cells begins with the melting of base pairs at the duplex origin to allow access to single-stranded DNA templates which are replicated by DNA polymerases. In bacteria, origin DNA is presumed to be melted by accessory proteins that allow loading of two ring-shaped replicative helicases around single-strand DNA (ssDNA) for bidirectional unwinding and DNA replication. In eukaryotes, by contrast, two replicative CMG (Cdc45-Mcm2-7-GINS) helicases are initially loaded head to head around origin double-strand DNA (dsDNA), and there does not appear to be a separate origin unwinding factor. This led us to investigate whether head-to-head CMGs use their adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-driven motors to initiate duplex DNA unwinding at the origin. Here, we show that CMG tracks on one strand of the duplex while surrounding it, and this feature allows two head-to-head CMGs to unwind dsDNA by using their respective motors to pull on opposite strands of the duplex. We further show that while CMG is capable of limited duplex unwinding on its own, the extent of unwinding is greatly and rapidly stimulated by addition of the multifunctional CMG-binding protein Mcm10 that is critical for productive initiation of DNA replication in vivo. On the basis of these findings, we propose that Mcm10 is a processivity or positioning factor that helps translate the work performed by the dual CMG motors at the origin into productive unwinding that facilitates bidirectional DNA replication.
The eukaryotic polymerase α (Pol α) synthesizes an RNA-DNA hybrid primer of 20–30 nucleotides. Pol α is composed of Pol1, Pol12, Primase 1 (Pri1), and Pri2. Pol1 and Pri1 contain the DNA polymerase and RNA primase activities, respectively. It has been unclear how Pol α hands over an RNA primer from Pri1 to Pol1 for DNA primer extension, and how the primer length is defined. Here we report the cryo-EM analysis of yeast Pol α in the apo, primer initiation, primer elongation, RNA primer hand-off from Pri1 to Pol1, and DNA extension states, revealing a series of very large movements. We reveal a critical point at which Pol1-core moves to take over the 3’-end of the RNA from Pri1. DNA extension is limited by a spiral motion of Pol1-core. Since both Pri1 and Pol1-core are flexibly attached to a stable platform, primer growth produces stress that limits the primer length.
Rad24-RFC (replication factor C) loads the 9-1-1 checkpoint clamp onto the recessed 5' ends by binding a 5' DNA at an external surface site and threading the 3' single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) into 9-1-1. We find here that Rad24-RFC loads 9-1-1 onto DNA gaps in preference to a recessed 5' end, thus presumably leaving 9-1-1 on duplex 3' ss/double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) after Rad24-RFC ejects from DNA. We captured five Rad24-RFC-9-1-1 loading intermediates using a 10-nt gap DNA. We also determined the structure of Rad24-RFC-9-1-1 using a 5-nt gap DNA. The structures reveal that Rad24-RFC is unable to melt DNA ends and that a Rad24 loop limits the dsDNA length in the chamber. These observations explain Rad24-RFC's preference for a pre-existing gap of over 5-nt ssDNA and suggest a direct role of the 9-1-1 in gap repair with various TLS (trans -lesion synthesis) polymerases in addition to signaling the ATR kinase.
Duplication of DNA genomes requires unwinding of the double-strand (ds) DNA so that each single strand (ss) can be copied by a DNA polymerase. The genomes of eukaryotic cells are unwound by two ring-shaped hexameric helicases that initially encircle dsDNA but transition to ssDNA for function as replicative helicases. How the duplex is initially unwound, and the role of the two helicases in this process, is poorly understood. We recently described an initiation mechanism for eukaryotes in which the two helicases are directed inward toward one another and shear the duplex open by pulling on opposite strands of the duplex while encircling dsDNA [L. D. Langston, M. E. O'Donnell, eLife 8 , e46515 (2019)]. Two head-to-head T-Antigen helicases are long known to be loaded at the SV40 origin. We show here that T-Antigen tracks head (N-tier) first on ssDNA, opposite the direction proposed for decades. We also find that SV40 T-Antigen tracks directionally while encircling dsDNA and mainly tracks on one strand of the duplex in the same orientation as during ssDNA translocation. Further, two inward directed T-Antigen helicases on dsDNA are able to melt a 150-bp duplex. These findings explain the “rabbit ear” DNA loops observed at the SV40 origin by electron microscopy and reconfigure how the DNA loops emerge from the double hexamer relative to earlier models. Thus, the mechanism of DNA shearing by two opposing helicases is conserved in a eukaryotic viral helicase and may be widely used to initiate origin unwinding of dsDNA genomes.
RFC uses ATP to assemble PCNA onto primed sites for replicative DNA polymerases δ and γ. The RFC pentamer forms a central chamber that binds 3′ ss/ds DNA junctions to load PCNA onto DNA during replication. We show here five structures revealing a novel 2nd DNA binding site in RFC that binds a 5′ duplex. This 5′ DNA site is located in the N-terminal BRCT domain and AAA+ module of the large Rfc1 subunit. It appears 5′ DNA binds after 3′ DNA binding to RFC. Our structures reveal ideal binding to a 7-nt gap, which includes 2 bp unwound by the clamp loader. Biochemical studies show enhanced binding to 5 and 10 nt gaps, consistent with the structural results. We propose that the 5′ site facilitates RFC’s PCNA loading activity at a DNA damage-induced gap to recruit gap-filling polymerases. These findings are consistent with genetic studies showing that base excision repair of gaps greater than 1 base requires PCNA and involves the 5′ DNA binding domain of Rfc1. We further observe that a 5′ end facilitates PCNA loading at an RPA coated 50-nt gap, suggesting a potential role of the RFC 5′ DNA site in longer gaps including during lagging strand DNA synthesis.
The 9-1-1 DNA checkpoint clamp is loaded onto 5'-recessed DNA to activate the DNA damage checkpoint that arrests the cell cycle. The 9-1-1 clamp is a heterotrimeric ring that is loaded in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by Rad24-RFC (hRAD17-RFC), an alternate clamp loader in which Rad24 replaces Rfc1 in the RFC1-5 clamp loader of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA). The 9-1-1 clamp loading mechanism has been a mystery, because, unlike RFC, which loads PCNA onto a 3'-recessed junction, Rad24-RFC loads the 9-1-1 ring onto a 5'-recessed DNA junction. Here we report two cryo-EM structures of Rad24-RFC-DNA with a closed or 27-Å open 9-1-1 clamp. The structures reveal a completely unexpected mechanism by which a clamp can be loaded onto DNA. Unlike RFC, which encircles DNA, Rad24 binds 5'-DNA on its surface, not inside the loader, and threads the 3' ssDNA overhang into the 9-1-1 clamp from above the ring.
RFC uses ATP to assemble PCNA onto primed sites for replicative DNA polymerases δ and ε. The RFC pentamer forms a central chamber that binds 3′ ss/ds DNA junctions to load PCNA onto DNA during replication. We show here five structures that identify a second DNA binding site in RFC that binds a 5′ duplex. This 5′ DNA site is located between the N-terminal BRCT domain and AAA+ module of the large Rfc1 subunit. Our structures reveal ideal binding to a 7-nt gap, which includes 2 bp unwound by the clamp loader. Biochemical studies show enhanced binding to 5 and 10 nt gaps, consistent with the structural results. Because both 3′ and 5′ ends are present at a ssDNA gap, we propose that the 5′ site facilitates RFC’s PCNA loading activity at a DNA damage-induced gap to recruit gap-filling polymerases. These findings are consistent with genetic studies showing that base excision repair of gaps greater than 1 base requires PCNA and involves the 5′ DNA binding domain of Rfc1. We further observe that a 5′ end facilitates PCNA loading at an RPA coated 30-nt gap, suggesting a potential role of the RFC 5′-DNA site in lagging strand DNA synthesis.
ABSTRACTIn response to DNA damage, the ring-shaped 9-1-1 clamp is loaded onto 5’ recessed DNA to arrest the cell cycle and activate the DNA damage checkpoint. The 9-1-1 clamp is a heterotrimeric ring that is loaded in S. cerevisiae by Rad24-RFC, an alternative clamp loader in which Rad24 replaces the Rfc1 subunit in the RFC1-5 clamp loader of PCNA. Unlike RFC that loads the PCNA ring onto a 3’-ss/ds DNA junction, Rad24-RFC loads the 9-1-1 ring onto a 5’-ss/ds DNA junction, a consequence of DNA damage. The underlying 9-1-1 clamp loading mechanism has been a mystery. Here we report two 3.2-Å cryo-EM structures of Rad24-RFC bound to DNA and either a closed or 27 Å open 9-1-1 clamp. The structures reveal a completely unexpected mechanism by which a clamp can be loaded onto DNA. The Rad24 subunit specifically recognizes the 5’-DNA junction and holds ds DNA outside the clamp loader and above the plane of the 9-1-1 ring, rather than holding DNA inside and below the clamp as in RFC. The 3’ ssDNA overhang is required to obtain the structure, and thus confers a second DNA binding site. The bipartite DNA binding by Rad24-RFC suggests that ssDNA may be flipped into the open 9-1-1 ring, similar to ORC-Cdc6 that loads the Mcm2-7 ring on DNA. We propose that entry of ssDNA through the 9-1-1 ring triggers the ATP hydrolysis and release of the Rad24-RFC. The key DNA binding residues are conserved in higher eukaryotes, and thus the 9-1-1 clamp loading mechanism likely generalizes.
High-resolution structures have not been reported for replicative helicases at a replication fork at atomic resolution, a prerequisite to understanding the unwinding mechanism. The eukaryotic replicative CMG (Cdc45, Mcm2-7, GINS) helicase contains a Mcm2-7 motor ring, with the N-tier ring in front and the C-tier motor ring behind. The N-tier ring is structurally divided into a zinc finger (ZF) sub-ring followed by the oligosaccharide/oligonucleotide-binding (OB) fold ring. Here we report the cryo-EM structure of CMG on forked DNA at 3.9 Å, revealing that parental DNA enters the ZF sub-ring and strand separation occurs at the bottom of the ZF sub-ring, where the lagging strand is blocked and diverted sideways by OB hairpin-loops of Mcm3, Mcm4, Mcm6, and Mcm7. Thus, instead of employing a specific steric exclusion process, or even a separation pin, unwinding is achieved via a “dam-and-diversion tunnel” mechanism that does not require specific protein-DNA interaction. The C-tier motor ring contains spirally configured PS1 and H2I loops of Mcms 2, 3, 5, 6 that translocate on the spirally-configured leading strand, and thereby pull the preceding DNA segment through the diversion tunnel for strand separation.
Significance The structure of the eukaryotic chromosomal replicase, DNA polymerase (Pol) δ, was determined in complex with its cognate proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) sliding clamp on primed DNA. The results show that the Pol3 catalytic subunit binds atop the PCNA ring, and the two regulatory subunits of Pol δ, Pol31, and Pol32, are positioned off to the side of the Pol3 clamp. The catalytic Pol3 binds DNA and PCNA such as to thread the DNA straight through the circular PCNA clamp. Considering the large diameter of the PCNA clamp, there is room for water between DNA and the inner walls of PCNA, indicating the clamp “waterskates” on DNA during function with polymerase.
The eukaryotic leading strand DNA polymerase (Pol) ε contains 4 subunits, Pol2, Dpb2, Dpb3 and Dpb4. Pol2 is a fusion of two B-family Pols; the N-terminal Pol module is catalytic and the C-terminal Pol module is non-catalytic. Despite extensive efforts, there is no atomic structure for Pol ε holoenzyme, critical to understanding how DNA synthesis is coordinated with unwinding and the DNA path through the CMG helicase-Pol ε-PCNA clamp. We show here a 3.5-Å cryo-EM structure of yeast Pol ε revealing that the Dpb3–Dpb4 subunits bridge the two DNA Pol modules of Pol2, holding them rigid. This information enabled an atomic model of the leading strand replisome. Interestingly, the model suggests that an OB fold in Dbp2 directs leading ssDNA from CMG to the Pol ε active site. These results complete the DNA path from entry of parental DNA into CMG to exit of daughter DNA from PCNA.
The current view is that eukaryotic replisomes are independent. Here we show that Ctf4 tightly dimerizes CMG helicase, with an extensive interface involving Psf2, Cdc45, and Sld5. Interestingly, Ctf4 binds only one Pol α-primase. Thus, Ctf4 may have evolved as a trimer to organize two helicases and one Pol α-primase into a replication factory. In the 2CMG-Ctf43-1Pol α-primase factory model, the two CMGs nearly face each other, placing the two lagging strands toward the center and two leading strands out the sides. The single Pol α-primase is centrally located and may prime both sister replisomes. The Ctf4-coupled-sister replisome model is consistent with cellular microscopy studies revealing two sister forks of an origin remain attached and are pushed forward from a protein platform. The replication factory model may facilitate parental nucleosome transfer during replication.
Our earlier study demonstrated that head-to-head CMGs that encircle duplex DNA and track inward at origins, melt double-strand (ds) DNA while encircling the duplex by pulling on opposite strands and shearing DNA apart (Langston and O’Donnell (2019) eLife 9, e46515). We show here that increasing the methylphosphonate neutral DNA from 10 nucleotides in the previous report, to 20 nucleotides, reveals that CMG encircling duplex DNA only interacts with the tracking strand compared to the non-tracking strand. This significantly enhances support that CMG tracks on duplex DNA by binding only one strand. Furthermore, EMSA assays using AMPPNP to load CMG onto DNA shows a stoichiometry of only 2 CMGs on an origin mimic DNA, containing a 150 bp duplex with two 3 prime single-strand (ss) tails, one on each end, enabling assay of dsDNA unwinding by a shearing force produced by only two head-to-head CMGs. The use of non-hydrolysable AMPPNP enabled a preincubation for CMG binding the two 3 prime tailed origin mimic DNA, and gave robust unwinding of dsDNA by head-to-head CMG-Mcm10’s. With this precedent, it is possible to envision that the cell may utilize opposing dsDNA motors to unwind DNA for other types of DNA transactions besides origin unwinding.
Replicative helicases in all cell types are hexameric rings that unwind DNA by steric exclusion in which the helicase encircles the tracking strand only and excludes the other strand from the ring. This mode of translocation allows helicases to bypass blocks on the strand that is excluded from the central channel. Unlike other replicative helicases, eukaryotic CMG helicase partially encircles duplex DNA at a forked junction and is stopped by a block on the non-tracking (lagging) strand. This report demonstrates that Mcm10, an essential replication protein unique to eukaryotes, binds CMG and greatly stimulates its helicase activity in vitro. Most significantly, Mcm10 enables CMG and the replisome to bypass blocks on the non-tracking DNA strand. We demonstrate that bypass occurs without displacement of the blocks and therefore Mcm10 must isomerize the CMG-DNA complex to achieve the bypass function.