Several inflammatory cytokines that promote inflammation and pathogenesis in asthma signal through the Janus kinase 1 (JAK1) pathway. This phase I, randomized, placebo‐controlled trial assessed the pharmacokinetics and safety of single and multiple ascending doses up to 15 mg twice daily for 14 days of a JAK1 inhibitor, GDC‐0214, in healthy volunteers (HVs; n = 66). Doses were administered with a dry powder, capsule‐based inhaler. An accompanying open‐label gamma scintigraphy study in HVs examined the lung deposition of a single dose of inhaled Technetium‐99m ( 99m Tc)‐radiolabeled GDC‐0214. GDC‐0214 plasma concentrations were linear and approximately dose‐proportional after both single and multiple doses. Peak plasma concentrations occurred at 15–30 min after dosing. The mean apparent elimination half‐life ranged from 32 to 56 h across all single and multiple dose cohorts. After single and multiple doses, all adverse events were mild or moderate, and none led to treatment withdrawal. There was no clear evidence of systemic toxicity due to JAK1 inhibition, and systemic exposure was low, with plasma concentrations at least 15‐fold less than the plasma protein binding‐corrected IC50 of JAK1 at the highest dose. Scintigraphy showed that approximately 50% of the emitted dose of radiolabeled GDC‐0214 was deposited in the lungs and was distributed well to the peripheral airways. 99m Tc‐radiolabeled GDC‐0214 (1 mg) exhibited a mean plasma C max similar to that observed in phase I at the same dose level. Overall, inhaled GDC‐0214 exhibited pharmacokinetic properties favorable for inhaled administration.

AbstractSeveral inflammatory cytokines that promote inflammation and pathogenesis in asthma signal through the Janus kinase 1 (JAK1) pathway. This phase I, randomized, placebo‐controlled trial assessed the pharmacokinetics and safety of single and multiple ascending doses up to 15 mg twice daily for 14 days of a JAK1 inhibitor, GDC‐0214, in healthy volunteers (HVs; n = 66). Doses were administered with a dry powder, capsule‐based inhaler. An accompanying open‐label gamma scintigraphy study in HVs examined the lung deposition of a single dose of inhaled Technetium‐99m (99mTc)‐radiolabeled GDC‐0214. GDC‐0214 plasma concentrations were linear and approximately dose‐proportional after both single and multiple doses. Peak plasma concentrations occurred at 15–30 min after dosing. The mean apparent elimination half‐life ranged from 32 to 56 h across all single and multiple dose cohorts. After single and multiple doses, all adverse events were mild or moderate, and none led to treatment withdrawal. There was no clear evidence of systemic toxicity due to JAK1 inhibition, and systemic exposure was low, with plasma concentrations at least 15‐fold less than the plasma protein binding‐corrected IC50 of JAK1 at the highest dose. Scintigraphy showed that approximately 50% of the emitted dose of radiolabeled GDC‐0214 was deposited in the lungs and was distributed well to the peripheral airways. 99mTc‐radiolabeled GDC‐0214 (1 mg) exhibited a mean plasma Cmax similar to that observed in phase I at the same dose level. Overall, inhaled GDC‐0214 exhibited pharmacokinetic properties favorable for inhaled administration.

Background: An extrafine formulation triple therapy combination of beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP), formoterol fumarate (FF), and glycopyrronium bromide (GB) has been developed for the maintenance treatment of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. This study used gamma scintigraphy to evaluate the intrapulmonary and extrapulmonary in vivo deposition of BDP/FF/GB, and the intrapulmonary regional distribution of the deposited formulation. Methods: This open-label uncontrolled nonrandomized single-dose study recruited 10 healthy volunteers and 9 patients with asthma. After a krypton-81m (81mKr) ventilation scan was conducted, subjects inhaled study drug (four inhalations of BDP/FF/GB 100/6/12.5 μg radiolabeled using technetium-99 m [99mTc]) through pressurized metered-dose inhaler, and a series of scintigraphic images were taken. The primary objective was to evaluate intrapulmonary drug deposition of BDP/FF/GB, determined as the percentage of nominal (i.e., metered) dose. Secondary endpoints included central/peripheral deposition ratio (C/P), and the standardized central/peripheral ratio (sC/P; 99mTc aerosol C/P/81mKr gas C/P). Results: All participants completed the study, with all scintigraphy procedures performed at one site. In patients with asthma, mean ± standard deviation intrapulmonary deposition was 25.50% ± 6.81%, not significantly different to that in healthy volunteers (22.74% ± 9.19%; p = 0.4715). Approximately half of the lung dose was deposited in the peripheral region of the lung (fraction deposited 0.52 ± 0.07 and 0.49 ± 0.06 in healthy volunteers and patients with asthma, respectively), resulting in C/P ratios of 0.94 ± 0.25 and 1.06 ± 0.25, respectively, with sC/P ratios of 1.80 ± 0.40 and 1.94 ± 0.38. Deposition patterns were similar in the two populations. BDP/FF/GB was well tolerated. Conclusions: This study confirmed that the extrafine particles delivered by BDP/FF/GB penetrate the peripheral areas of the lungs, with a similar proportion of particles deposited in the central and peripheral regions. Importantly, the deposition patterns were similar in healthy volunteers and patients with asthma, suggesting that disease characteristics are unlikely to impact drug deposition. Clinical Trial Registration number: NCT03795350.

Aims and Objectives: Delivery of therapeutic aerosols to peripheral airways is key in the treatment of asthma. We investigated the lung deposition and distribution of extra fine BDP/FF/GB inhalation solution delivered via a pressurised metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) in subjects with asthma and healthy volunteers. Methods: Subjects underwent gamma scintigraphy after 4 inhalations of technetium (99mTc) radiolabelled BDP/FF/GB, 100/6/12.5 mcg. After correcting for 99mTc decay, tissue attenuation and background radioactivity, total lung deposition was expressed as percent of nominal dose (DL%ND), and intra-pulmonary drug distribution (right lung only) as the fraction of 99mTc labelled aerosol and krypton (81mKr) gas in the central (C) and peripheral (P) regions of interest. The C/P ratio was calculated for the 99mTc aerosol and 81mKr gas and their ratio is referred to as standardised C/P (sC/P). Results: Nine asthmatics (6 males, FEV1 61 – 76 % predicted, 32-48 years) and 10 healthy subjects (6 males, FEV1 89 - 120 % predicted, 28-49 years) completed the study. No differences were observed in lung deposition and distribution parameters (Table): Conclusions: Lung deposition of extra fine BDP/FF/GB pMDI is comparable between healthy subjects and patients with mild-moderate asthma and is well dispersed across the central and peripheral lung regions.

This gamma scintigraphy imaging study was the first to assess pulmonary and extrathoracic deposition and regional lung deposition patterns of a radiolabelled long-acting muscarinic antagonist/long-acting β2-agonist fixed-dose combination glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate dihydrate (GFF) 14.4/10μg (equivalent to glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate 18/9.6μg), delivered by pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) using novel co-suspension delivery technology. In this Phase I, randomized, single-centre, single-blind, single-dose, two-treatment, crossover, placebo-controlled study (PT003020), 10 healthy male adults received two actuations of GFF pMDI (7.2/5.0μg per actuation) and placebo pMDI (containing phospholipid-based porous particles without active pharmaceutical ingredient), both radiolabelled with 99mTc, up to 5MBq per actuation. Gamma scintigraphy images of lungs, stomach, head and neck were recorded. In addition, images of the actuators after use, collected mouth washings and exhalation filters were acquired. On average, 38.4% of the emitted dose of radiolabelled GFF pMDI, and 32.8% of radiolabelled placebo pMDI, was deposited in the lungs. The percentage emitted dose detected in the oropharyngeal and stomach regions was 61.4% and 66.9% for radiolabelled GFF pMDI and placebo pMDI, respectively. For both treatments, ≤0.25% of the emitted dose was detected in the exhalation filter. The normalized outer/inner ratio was 0.57 and 0.59 for radiolabelled GFF pMDI and placebo pMDI, respectively, and the standardized central/peripheral ratio was 1.85 and 1.94 respectively, indicating delivery of both co-suspension delivery technology formulations throughout the airways. There were no new or unexpected safety findings. In conclusion, both formulations were efficiently and uniformly deposited in the lungs with similar regional deposition patterns, oropharyngeal and stomach deposition, exhalation fraction and actuator-recovered dose.

Background GFF MDI showed efficacy in Phase III trials of patients with moderate-to-very-severe COPD. Lung deposition and the regions where it occurs may relate to specific receptor activation and aerosol performance. We evaluated pulmonary deposition of radiolabelled GFF delivered by Co-Suspension ™ Technology MDI (porous particles). Methods In this Phase I, randomized, single-blind, single-dose, single-centre, placebo-controlled study, healthy male subjects (n=10) received two inhalations of 99m Tc-pertechnetate (≤10MBq) radiolabelled GFF 14.4/9.6μg or placebo (porous particles only) in a crossover design with a ≥5-day washout. In vitro analyses showed that aerosol delivery was unaltered by radiolabel application. Gamma counts of the lungs, stomach, oropharynx, mouthwash and exhalation filter were determined. Results Radioactivity detected in the various regions (Table 1) showed deposition in both central and peripheral regions, with very low exhaled fraction. Deposition was similar between GFF MDI and placebo MDI. One treatment-related adverse event occurred with GFF MDI and one with placebo MDI; neither were serious. Conclusion Both GFF and placebo MDI Co-Suspension™ formulations were efficiently deposited in the lungs with similar regional deposition patterns. The variability observed among subjects was typical of inhalation studies.

Background : VHC-use to facilitate pressurised metered dose inhaler (pMDI) drug delivery is recommended in emergencies. Static depletion of the lung dose occurs with first use of VHCs. Anti-static (A-S) measures are not practicable in emergencies (surfactant washing—no time for drying, and priming puffs—wasteful, time-consuming and arbitrary). Methods : Next Generation Impactor™ (NGI) comparison of delivery of salbutamol sulphate (SS) pMDI via A2A Spacer® VHC (A2A), with A2A used a) detergent-washed and dried per Instructions for Use (IfU), b) unwashed, straight from supplier bag, and c) A-S cloth wiped and A-S bag used during manufacture. SS lung dose was calculated from NGI sum of stages 3-5. Results : A2A washed and dried per IfU provided the best lung dose, Fine Particle Fraction (FPF) and Fine Particle Dose (FPD) data. The unwashed, ex-bag A2A was poorest, A2A used from the A-S bag gave an intermediate performance, delivering 45% and 66% respectively of the FPD obtained for A2A used per IfU. All paired differences were significant (P<0.05). View this table: Conclusion : The unwashed, ex-bag data confirm undesirable drug delivery per probable use in emergency situations, and that the adoption of A-S pre-treatment and bagging contributes to improved performance. Optimisation work is being conducted to facilitate use straight from the packaging, without washing or priming the VHC. The data suggest that provision of an A-S pre-treated VHC product is desirable for the emergency room, including ambulance and school use.

BACKGROUND:The I-neb AAD System was designed to deliver aerosol with two different breathing pattern algorithms: the Tidal Breathing Mode (TBM) and the Target Inhalation Mode (TIM). For the purpose of the study, the TBM breathing pattern algorithm was set to guide the subjects to inhalation during tidal breathing with aerosol pulsed during 50-80% of the time spent on inhalation, whereas the TIM breathing pattern was set to guide the subject to a slow and deep inhalation of up to approximately 9 sec with aerosol pulsed for up to 7 sec, leaving 2 sec for particle deposition in the lungs. In TIM, the inspiratory flow was guided to approximately 20 L/min through a built-in resistance in the mouthpiece. METHODS:We have, in a randomized, open-label, crossover study of 12 healthy subjects evaluated lung deposition following administration of a radiolabeled aerosol from the I-neb AAD System with the TBM and TIM breathing patterns. RESULTS:The results showed that mean lung deposition was significantly higher when using the I-neb AAD System with the TIM breathing pattern (73.3%) than with the TBM breathing pattern (62.8%). The mean exhaled fractions were low (<1%) for both breathing patterns. The nebulization time was significantly shorter with the TIM breathing pattern (3.0 min) than with the TBM breathing pattern (4.7 min). CONCLUSIONS:The results of the present study showed that lung deposition with the slow and deep inhalation achieved through the I-neb AAD System in TIM was superior to the lung deposition achieved during tidal breathing in TBM. With the combination of high lung deposition, almost no loss of aerosol during exhalation, and short nebulization time the I-neb AAD System with the TIM breathing pattern should be of special value to patients who require multiple daily dosing of aerosolized medication, are using drugs that should not be wasted into the room air, or would benefit from a more efficient delivery system.

BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to investigate the inhalation of a liposomal formulation of amikacin in healthy male volunteers in terms of pulmonary deposition, clearance, and safety following nebulization with a commercial jet nebulizer. METHODS Amikacin was encapsulated in liposomes comprised of dipalmitoyl phosphatidylcholine (DPPC) and cholesterol via a proprietary manufacturing process (20 mg/mL final amikacin concentration). The liposomes were radiolabeled with (99m)Tc using the tin chloride labeling method. A nominal dose of 120 mg of drug product was loaded into a PARI LC STAR nebulizer, aerosolized using a PARI Boy compressor where subjects inhaled for 20 min. Lung deposition was determined by gamma scintigraphy in three healthy male volunteers at the following time points (0, 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h post-administration). RESULTS Total lung deposition, expressed as a percentage of the emitted dose, was 32.3 +/- 3.4%. The time-dependent retention of radiolabeled liposomes was biphasic with an initial rapid reduction in counts, followed by a slower phase to 48 h. The overall mean retention at 24 and 48 h was 60.4 and 38.3% of the initial dose deposited, respectively. The observed clearance of radiolabel is consistent with clearance of amikacin following aerosol delivery to rats. There were no clinically significant changes in laboratory parameters, vital signs, or ECG. No adverse events including cough or bronchospasm were reported. CONCLUSIONS Inhalation of a single nominal dose of 120 mg liposomal amikacin results in prolonged retention of drug-loaded liposomes in the lungs of healthy volunteers. The treatment was well tolerated.

Purpose. A study was designed to compare differences in insulin aerosol deposition profiles in healthy male and female subjects, as well as examine the effect of mouthpiece cross-sectional shape, volume, and taper on deposition profiles using a developmental AERx pulmonary delivery system.

A scintigraphic study was carried out to compare the lung deposition of budesonide delivered via Clickhaler and Turbuhaler dry powder inhalers in healthy volunteers. Validation of Technetium-99m ((99m)Tc) radiolabeling of the budesonide/lactose blend used in the Clickhaler and excipient-free budesonide used in the Turbuhaler was carried out using a multistage liquid impinger, and compared with reference unlabeled devices. Budesonide was quantified using high-performance liquid chromatography and (99m)Tc by scintillation counting. The percentages (SD) of fine particles (<5.5 microm diameter) from radiolabeled and unlabeled devices were not significantly different (p > 0.05). Mean values for drug and radiolabel, respectively, were 34.6% (2.5) and 31.6% (3.8) for the Clickhaler, and 29.8% (5.5) and 31.4% (5 6) for the Turbuhaler. Fifteen healthy male volunteers received a single dose (2 x 200 microg actuations) from both devices in a double-blinded, double dummy, crossover study. During dosing, each inhalation maneuver was recorded using a computer-linked pressure transducer. To permit accurate determination of radiolabeled drug deposition, the lung margins of each volunteer were determined by Krypton-81m ((81m)Kr) gas imaging. Mean [SD] lung deposition for the Clickhaler (26.8% [6.8], RSD 25.2) was significantly greater (p < 0.001) than for the Turbuhaler (15.8% [6.6], RSD 42.2). Inspiratory flow rate parameters were similar for both devices with peak and mean values of 73 and 51 L/min for the Clickhaler, and 73 and 47 L/min for the Turbuhaler, respectively. These results indicate that, in healthy volunteers, budesonide lung deposition was higher and more consistent with the Clickhaler than with the Turbuhaler.

Gamma scintigraphic imaging was employed in 10 healthy volunteers to compare the total and regional lung deposition of aerosols generated by two delivery platforms that permitted microprocessor-controlled actuation at an optimal point during inhalation. An aqueous solution containing 99mTc-DTPA was used to assess the deposition of aerosols delivered by inhalation from two successive unit-dosage forms (44 μl volume) using a prototype of a novel liquid aerosol system (AERx™ Pulmonary Delivery System). This was compared with aerosol deposition after inhalation of two 50 μl puffs of a 99mTc-HMPAO-labeled solution formulation from a pressurized metered dose inhaler (MDI). The in vitro size characteristics of the radiolabeled aerosols were determined by cascade impaction. For the AERx system, the predicted lung delivery efficiency based on the product of emitted dose (60.8%, coefficient of variation (CV)=12%) and fine particle fraction (% by mass of aerosol particles <5.7 μm in diameter) was 53.3% (CV=13%). For the solution MDI, the emitted dose was 62.9% (CV=13%) and the predicted lung dose was 44.9% (CV=15%). The AERx system demonstrated efficient and reproducible dosing characteristics in vivo. Of the dose loaded into the device, the mean percent reaching the lungs was 53.3% (CV=10%), with only 6.9% located in the oropharynx/stomach. In contrast, the lung deposition from the solution MDI was significantly less (21.7%) and more variable (CV=31%), with 42.0% of the radiolabel detected in the oropharynx/stomach. Analysis of the regional deposition of the radioaerosol indicated a homogeneous pattern of deposition after delivery from the AERx system. A predominantly central pattern of distribution occurred after MDI delivery, where the pattern of deposition was biased towards a central zone depicting the conducting airways. The AERx system, in contrast to MDIs, seems highly suited to the delivery of systemically active agents via pulmonary administration.