BACKGROUND:Given that diagnostic, neoadjuvant treatment, and surgical approaches to rectal cancer have changed markedly in the last 25 years, knowledge translation (KT) may be useful to optimize rectal cancer surgery and improve patient outcomes. We sought to evaluate the impact of surgeon-directed KT to improve the quality of rectal cancer surgery on local tumour recurrence in Ontario. METHODS:Ontario's 14 health regions were previously categorized into 2 high-intensity and 12 low-intensity KT regions, based on KT methods (e.g., theory, audit, feedback), applied from 2006 to 2012 to improve the quality of rectal cancer surgery. In the high-intensity regions, efforts encouraged preoperative magnetic resonance imaging, appropriate radiation, and optimal surgical technique. We abstracted hospital chart data from across Ontario for a random sample of cases from 2010 to 2012 based on the respective population of a region and the relative hospital case volume within their region. The main study outcome was local tumour recurrence. RESULTS:In the high-intensity and low-intensity KT regions, we reviewed data from 523 (48.6%) and 557 (51.4%) patients, respectively. Descriptive variables (e.g., age, sex, tumour stage) were similar between groups. In the high- and low-intensity regions, the proportion of patients with a permanent stoma was 31.4% and 26.4% (p = 0.08), the proportion with positive radial margins was 8.0% and 6.1% (p = 0.2), and the proportion with local tumour recurrence was 6.3% and 5.2% (p = 0.2), respectively. The adjusted risk of time to local recurrence was similar in the high- and low-intensity KT regions (hazard ratio 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.50-1.05). CONCLUSION:The use of resource-intense methods was not associated with improved patient outcomes, including local tumour recurrence. New approaches are needed to optimize the population-level quality of rectal cancer surgery.

BACKGROUND:For patients undergoing rectal cancer surgery, we evaluated whether suboptimal preoperative surgeon evaluation of resection margins is a latent condition factor-a factor that is common, unrecognized, and may increase the risk of certain adverse events, including local tumour recurrence, positive surgical margin, nontherapeutic surgery, and in-hospital mortality.METHODS:In this observational case series of patients who underwent rectal cancer surgery during 2016 in Local Health Integrated Network 4 region of Ontario (population 1.4 million), chart review and a trigger tool were used to identify patients who experienced the adverse events. An expert panel adjudicated whether each event was preventable or nonpreventable and identified potential contributing factors to adverse events.RESULTS:Among 173 patients, 25 (14.5%) had an adverse event and 13 cases (7.5%) were adjudicated as preventable. Rate of surgeon awareness of preoperative margin status was low at 50% and similar among cases with and without an adverse event (p = 0.29). Suboptimal surgeon preoperative evaluation of surgical margins was adjudicated a contributing factor in all 11 preventable local recurrence, positive margin, and nontherapeutic surgery cases. Failure to rescue was judged a contributing factor in the two cases with preventable in-hospital mortality.CONCLUSIONS:Suboptimal surgeon preoperative evaluation of surgical margins in rectal cancer is likely a latent condition factor. Optimizing margin evaluation may be an efficient quality improvement target.

Background: Across Ontario, since the year 2006 various knowledge translation (KT) interventions designed to improve the quality of rectal cancer surgery have been implemented by the provincial cancer agency or by individual researchers. Ontario is divided administratively into 14 health regions. We piloted a method to audit and score for each region of the province KT interventions implemented to improve the quality of rectal cancer surgery. Methods: We interviewed stakeholders to audit KT interventions used in respective regions over years 2006 to 2014. Results were summarized into narrative and visual forms. KT experts reviewed these data and then, for each region, scored KT intervention implementation using a 20-item KT Signature Assessment Tool. Scores could range from 20-100 with higher scores commensurate with greater KT intervention implementation. Results: There were thirty interviews. KT experts produced scores for each region that were bimodally distributed, with an average score for 2 regions of 78 (range 73-83) and for 12 regions of 30.5 (range 22-38). Conclusion: Our methods efficiently identified two groups with similar KT Signature scores. Two regions had relatively high scores reflecting numerous KT interventions and the use of sustained iterative approaches in addition to those encouraged by the provincial cancer agency, while 12 regions had relatively low scores reflecting minimal activities. These groupings will be used for future comparative quantitative analyses to help determine if higher KT signature scores correlate with improved measures for region-level quality of rectal cancer surgery.

Background Knowledge translation (KT) interventions can facilitate the implementation of evidence-based practice and help close quality gaps. Across Ontario, since approximately the year 2006, numerous KT interventions have been implemented by the provincial cancer agency or by individual researchers. Ontario is divided administratively into 14 Local Health Integrated Networks (LHINs). We piloted a methodology to summarize and score at the LHIN level all KT activities implemented to improve the quality of rectal surgery (i.e., a KT Signature score).Methods We interviewed stakeholders to identify KT interventions used in respective LHINs over years 2006 to 2014. Results were summarized into narrative and visual forms. KT experts reviewed and scored final summaries using a 20-item KT Signature Assessment Tool. Scores for each item ranged from 1 – 5. Thus scores could range from 20-100 for each LHIN.Results There were thirty interviews. KT experts produced KT Signature scores for each LHIN that were bimodally distributed with an average score for 2 LHINs of 78 (range 73-83) and for 12 LHINs of 30.5 (range 22-38).Conclusion Related to region level KT interventions to improve rectal cancer surgery quality, we identified two KT Signature types. Scores in 12 Ontario LHINs were low reflecting minimal efforts. Two LHINs had high scores reflecting implementation of numerous KT interventions in addition to those encouraged by the provincial cancer agency. Our methods and results require further validation. But they should be of interest to stakeholders implementing interventions designed to improve medical care at a population level.

Background:Patients with rectal cancer in whom the mesorectal fascia is threatened by tumour are more likely than all patients with stage II/III disease to benefit from preoperative radiotherapy (RT). The objective of this study was to assess whether thestatus of the mesorectal fascia versus a stage II/III designation can best inform the use of preoperative RT in patients undergoing major rectal cancer resection.Methods:We reviewed the charts of consecutive patients with primary rectal cancer treated by a single surgeon at McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, between March 2006 and December 2012. The status of the mesorectal fascia was assessed by digital rectal examination, pelvic computed tomography and, when needed, pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Patients whose mesorectal fascia was threatened or involved by tumour received preoperative RT. The study outcomes were rates of positive circumferential radial margin (CRM) and local tumour recurrence.Results:A total of 153 patients were included, of whom 76 (49.7%) received preoperative RT because of concerns of a compromised mesorectal fascia. The median length of follow-up was 4.5 years. The number of CRM-positive cases in the RT and no-RT groups was 16 (22%) and 1 (1%), respectively (p < 0.01), and the number of cases of local tumour recurrence was 5 (7%) and 2 (3%), respectively (p = 0.2). Rates were similar when only patients with stage II/III tumours were included. Overall, 26 patients (17.0%) received MRI.Conclusion:The status of the mesorectal fascia, not tumour stage, may best identify patients for preoperative RT.

Background and ObjectivesTreatment decisions for rectal cancer rely on preoperative staging with CT and MRI scans. We assessed the quality of such scans in a region of Ontario. MethodsWe retrospectively collected data for patients undergoing rectal cancer surgery between July 2011 and December 2014. We measured three aspects of quality: use; comprehensiveness of reporting T-category, N-category, mesorectal fascia (MRF) status; and in non-radiated patients sensitivity and specificity of reports for relevant elements. ResultsA total of 559 patients underwent major rectal cancer surgery. Preoperative staging with CT and MRI was performed in 93% and 50% of patients. CT scan reports provided information on T-category, N-category, and MRF status in 41%, 92%, and 16% of cases. These same elements were reported on MRI in 88%, 93%, and 62% of cases. CT scan sensitivity and specificity was 80% and 80% for T-category, and 85% and 39% for N-category. MRI sensitivity and specificity was 75% and 81% for T-category, 79% and 37% for N-category, and 33% and 89% for MRF status. ConclusionIn this region of Ontario, pre-operative MRI was underutilized, CT reporting of MRF status was low, and when reported sensitivity and specificity of T- and N-category were similar for CT and MRI.

Background A positive circumferential radial margin (CRM) after rectal cancer surgery is an important predictor of local recurrence. The definition of a positive CRM differs internationally, and reported rates vary greatly in the literature. This study used time-series population-based data to assess positive CRM rates in a region over time and to inform future methods of CRM analysis in a defined geographic area. Methods Chart reviews provided relevant data from consecutive patients undergoing rectal cancer surgery between 2006 and 2012 in all hospitals of the authors’ region. Outcomes included rates for pathologic examination of CRM, CRM distance reporting, and positive CRM. The rate of positive CRM was calculated using various definitions. The variations included positive margin cutoffs of CRM at 1 mm or less versus 2 mm or less and inclusion or exclusion of cases without CRM assessment. Results In this study, 1222 consecutive rectal cancer cases were analyzed. The rate for pathology reporting of CRM distance increased from 54.7 to 93.2 % during the study. Depending on how the rate of positive CRM was defined, its value varied 8.5 to 19.4 % in 2006 and 6.0 to 12.5 % in 2012. Using a pre-specified definition, the rate of positive CRM decreased over time from 14.0 to 6.3 %. Conclusions A marked increase in CRM distance reporting was observed, whereas the rates of positive CRM dropped, suggesting improved pathologist and surgeon performance over time. Changing definitions greatly influenced the rates of positive CRM, indicating the need for more transparency when such population-based rates are reported in the literature.

# Urinary metabolomics of gastric cancer {#article-title-2} Gastric adenocarcinoma (GC) has 70%–75% mortality owing to delayed diagnosis. There is no standard screening in North America. Metabolomics measures low molecular weight chemicals (metabolites) in body fluids/tissues to provide a

Introduction In many jurisdictions geographic and resource constraints are barriers to multidisciplinary cancer conference review of all patients undergoing cancer surgery. We piloted an internet-based collaborative cancer conference (I-CCC) for rectal cancer to overcome these barriers in the LHIN4 region of Ontario (population 1.4 million). Methods Surgeons practicing at one of 10 LHIN4 hospitals were invited to participate in I-CCC reviews. A secure internet audio and visual link facilitated review of cross-sectional images and case details. Before review, referring surgeons detailed initial treatment plans. Main treatment options included preoperative radiation, straight to surgery, and plan uncertain. Changes were noted following I-CCC review from initial to final treatment plan. Major changes included: redirect patient to preoperative radiation from straight to surgery or plan uncertain; and redirect patient to straight to surgery from preoperative radiation or plan uncertain. Minor changes included: change type of neoadjuvant therapy; request additional tests (e.g., pelvic MRI); or formal MCC review. Results From November 2010 to May 2012, 20 surgeons (7 academic and 13 community) submitted 57 rectal cancer cases for I-CCC review. After I-CCC review, 30 of 57 (53 %) cases had treatment plan changes: 17 major and 13 minor. No patient or tumour factors predicted for treatment plan change. Conclusions An I-CCC for rectal cancer in a large geographic region was feasible and influenced surgeon treatment recommendations in 53 % of cases. Because no factor predicted for treatment plan change, it is likely prudent that all rectal cancer patients undergo some form of collaborative review.

BACKGROUND:Stakeholders suggest that integrating end users into the planning and execution of quality improvement interventions may more effectively close quality gaps. We tested if such an approach could improve the quality of colorectal cancer surgery in a large geographic region (i.e., LHIN4) in Ontario, Canada.METHODS:All LHIN4 surgeons who provide colorectal cancer surgery were invited to an October 2006 inaugural QICC-L4 workshop and subsequent workshops in 2008, 2010, and 2012. At workshops, surgeons selected clinically relevant quality markers for targeted improvement and interventions to achieve improvements. Selected markers included rates of colon and rectal radiology imaging, rate of pathology reporting of rectal radial margin distance, and rate of positive rectal radial margins. To date, implemented interventions have included audit and feedback, tailoring interviews to identify barriers and facilitators to optimal quality, and preoperative internet-based patient reviews. Hospital and regional cancer centre charts provide audit data for annual feedback reports to surgeons.RESULTS:Participating surgeons at workshops and surgeon participants in preoperative reviews treated approximately 70 % of all LHIN4 patients undergoing colorectal surgery. For years 2006-2012, the rate of radiology imaging for colon and rectal cases increased from 70 to 91 % and from 71 to 91 %, respectively. For rectal cases, the rate of reporting radial margins increased (55-93 %), and the rate of positive radial margins decreased (14-6 %).CONCLUSIONS:Initiation of the integrated knowledge translation QICC-L4 project in a large geographic region was associated with marked improvements in relevant colorectal cancer surgery quality markers.