Given the continuous improvement of information technologies and development of artificial intelligence, and the need to introduce advanced foreign standards of training of high-quality personnel in the national educational system, state-private partnership in the field of higher education is of great importance. In the course of ensuring the effectiveness of the latter, a special role belongs to legal liability, which plays an extremely important role in regulating social relations, ensuring their stability and security. The complex of these aspects determines the relevance of the topic. The purpose of the study is to identify promising areas for improving the legal liability of entities providing state-private partnerships in higher education. Such methods as analysis, synthesis, deduction, induction, and the logical and legal method are used in the article. The study analyzes the essence of social responsibility, the positive and negative aspects of legal liability, and the promising areas for improving legal liability in the area of state-private partnership in higher education, including academic responsibility within this area. With a view to ensuring a higher level of legality in the course of state-private partnership, the author recommends that administrative and criminal liability should be provided for violation of the principles and other requirements and principles of current legislation on state-private partnership.

The purpose of the article was to determine the specific features of public control over the activities of certain law enforcement agencies and to develop suggestions for their improvement. The methodological basis of the research is general scientific (method of philosophical dialectics, etc.) and special legal methods of cognition (systemic, theoretical and legal, formal and dogmatic, comparative, state modeling method, etc.) The authors have developed their own definition of the concept of public control over the activities of law enforcement agencies. In the conclusions it has been offered to develop and approve the Law of Ukraine «On public control over the activities of law enforcement and supervisory bodies», which would systematize all forms of public control provided for in the Ukrainian legislation. Finally, suggestions have been developed for the introduction of positive international experiences of public control over the activities of law enforcement agencies in various countries.

This article examines, and thoroughly analyzes, the key elements of the current state of national security processes in Ukraine. Also, ways of possible improvement of the state of ensuring the national security of Ukraine in the modern conditions of the active operation of the martial law regime are considered. It is noted that different countries of the world, at their own discretion, tend to interpret the essence and important elements of national security that exist in the world today. In addition, countries have different opportunities to take real action in relation to reforming the situation with their national security. The article focuses on the fact that truly high-quality and dynamic development of the sphere of proper provision of national security occurs in the state only when it is under threat (its state sovereignty, territorial integrity, or other important interests). The example of Israel, the United States and some other countries is not the only one where only after the emergence of this or that danger, the mechanisms and tools to overcome it begin to work in practice. Also, the importance of achieving Ukraine's full membership in the NATO military and political alliance was emphasized. After all, this military and political alliance, which unites about three dozen sovereign states, the majority of which are true liberal democracies with real rule of law and a transparent and effective state system, is recognized as the best example of such a defense alliance in history of humanity and is a good association of states close to Ukraine in spirit. It is indicated that after repelling the Russian invasion, Ukraine should focus all efforts on joining NATO.

This article examines, and thoroughly analyzes, the key elements of the current state of national security processes in Ukraine. Also, ways of possible improvement of the state of ensuring the national security of Ukraine in the modern conditions of the active operation of the martial law regime are considered. It is noted that different countries of the world, at their own discretion, tend to interpret the essence and important elements of national security that exist in the world today. In addition, countries have different opportunities to take real action in relation to reforming the situation with their national security. The article focuses on the fact that truly high-quality and dynamic development of the sphere of proper provision of national security occurs in the state only when it is under threat (its state sovereignty, territorial integrity, or other important interests). The example of Israel, the United States and some other countries is not the only one where only after the emergence of this or that danger, the mechanisms and tools to overcome it begin to work in practice. Also, the importance of achieving Ukraine’s full membership in the NATO military and political alliance was emphasized. After all, this military and political alliance, which unites about three dozen sovereign states, the majority of which are true liberal democracies with real rule of law and a transparent and effective state system, is recognized as the best example of such a defense alliance in history of humanity and is a good association of states close to Ukraine in spirit. It is indicated that after repelling the Russian invasion, Ukraine should focus all efforts on joining NATO.

Every society needs the recognition and protection of the rights of its citizens, and this becomes more proper for every administration in respecting this protection for the common good of its society. In this article, international experience of protecting private rights in the sphere of public administration has been analyzed. On the basis of the researched information the authors have provided concrete ways of implementing the specified international experience into domestic state and his legal system. The essence and characteristic features of legal ways to protect the legitimate interests of private individuals within public relations have been clarified among other things. The genesis of the development of the ways to protect private rights in the sphere of public administration has been analyzed. Particular attention has been paid to the insufficient capacity of Ukraine to ensure the inviolability of private rights, freedoms and interests of the entities of public legal relations, compared to the developed countries of Western Europe and North America. At the same time, the emphasis has been made on the gradual increase in the level of democracy and the rule of law in Ukraine over the last 20 years. It has been claimed that a special “acceleration” of the indicated reforms took place immediately after two socially important events, namely the Orange Revolution of 2004 and the Revolution of Dignity of 2013-2014. However, the so-called “energy fervor” gained at the beginning of the reform is slowing down in Ukraine.