BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:CSF proteomics has emerged as a valuable strategy for identifying diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). However, the limited availability and volumes of CSF samples restrict the broader clinical application of CSF-based biomarker panels. To address this challenge, we investigated whether the novel nucleic acid-linked immuno-sandwich assay (NULISA) multiplex platform-capable of quantifying multiple neural, glial, and inflammatory markers from minimal biofluid volumes-could validate previously proposed biomarkers and identify additional candidates relevant to ALS. METHODS:Using this platform, we measured a targeted panel of 131 biomarkers in cohorts of patients with C9orf72-associated ALS, sporadic ALS (sALS), and matched healthy controls. RESULTS:The 6 markers neurofilament heavy chain (NEFH) and neurofilament light chain (NEFL), chitinases-particularly chitotriosidase-1 (CHIT1) and chitinase-3-like protein-1 (CHI3L1), and chemokines CCL2 and CCL3 were significantly elevated in both ALS groups compared with controls. These biomarkers correlated with disease progression and demonstrated strong diagnostic performance when combined into aggregate scores, as reflected by a high area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for ALS. Notably, C9orf72-ALS patients exhibited higher levels of the oxidative stress-related markers PRDX6 and ENO2, compared with sALS patients, suggesting a genotype-specific molecular signature. DISCUSSION:Overall, our findings support the use of a multiplexed panel of diverse, inflammatory, glial, and neurodegeneration-associated biomarkers as a complementary diagnostic and prognostic tool alongside established measurements of neurofilaments. This approach may enhance biomarker robustness while minimizing CSF volume requirements, thereby improving clinical feasibility in ALS research and care.

OBJECTIVE:Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a clinically heterogeneous neurodegenerative disease requiring reliable biomarkers to improve patient stratification and trial design. While serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) reflects neuroaxonal stress and disease aggressiveness, troponin T (TnT) may capture complementary aspects of neuromuscular involvement. We assessed the associations of TnT and sNfL with D50-derived measures of disease aggressiveness (D50) and disease accumulation (rD50) in ALS. METHODS:In this retrospective observation, TnT and sNfL levels from ALS patients in two independent German cohorts were analyzed using the D50 disease progression model; discovery cohort (Essen, n = 433) and an independent replication cohort (Bonn, n = 185). RESULTS:TnT levels were strongly associated with rD50-defined disease phases in the discovery cohort (p < 0.001). While not all subgroup-specific associations were replicated, the overall relationship between TnT and disease accumulation was supported in the independent replication cohort. In contrast, sNfL showed no consistent relationship with rD50-derived disease phases. sNfL concentrations demonstrated a significant inverse association with D50, supporting a relationship with disease aggressiveness across both cohorts (p < 0.001). Associations between TnT levels and D50-defined disease aggressiveness were generally weaker and less consistent. INTERPRETATION:TnT was associated with measures of disease accumulation (rD50), whereas sNfL was more closely associated with disease aggressiveness (D50). Our results suggest that TnT and sNfL capture different dimensions of disease status within the D50 framework. Further longitudinal studies are needed to determine whether combining these biomarkers improves disease stratification or prognostic assessment in clinical practice and therapeutic trials.

OBJECTIVES:Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) share neuropathological features, including tau, amyloid, and TDP-43 pathology. This study investigated whether AD-related pathological changes are associated with cognitive impairment ALS. METHODS:Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF total-tau, phosphorylated-tau, beta-amyloid) and plasma biomarkers (TDP-43; neurofilament light chain [NfL]) were analyzed in 192 individuals with ALS or ALS with frontotemporal dementia (ALS-FTD) and 100 healthy controls. Cognitive performance was assessed using the Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioral ALS Screen (ECAS). Group comparisons and regression analyses examined associations between biomarker profiles and cognitive status. Autopsy data were available for a subset of participants. RESULTS:Compared with healthy controls, patients with ALS - particularly those with cognitive impairment (ALSci) or ALS-FTD - showed elevated AD-related biomarkers. Significant differences in beta-amyloid levels were observed between healthy controls (HCs) and patients with ALSci, but not between controls and cognitively unimpaired patients. CSF p-tau and total-tau levels were strongly associated with domain-specific cognitive performance. In contrast, plasma extracellular vesicle TDP-43 and NfL showed weak or no association with cognition. In vivo biomarkers alone reliably distinguished cognitive impairment only in ALSci and ALS-FTD. Postmortem analyses showed no strong association between ABC scores or overall TDP-43 burden and cognitive state; however, temporal and hippocampal TDP-43 burden was associated with cognitive dysfunction. INTERPRETATION:Our findings suggest that tau-related CSF biomarkers, particularly p-tau and total-tau, are associated with cognitive deficits in ALS, indicating that AD-related pathology might be associated to cognitive decline in ALS. However, postmortem data showed even stronger relation of TDP43 pathology to cognitive deficits in ALS. ANN NEUROL 2026;100:123-138.

PURPOSE:Besides motor brain regions, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) affects non-motor regions such as front temporal regions, affecting various cognitive domains. METHOD:We performed a behavioral study using the attention network test (ANT) to examine two components of attention (alerting, executive condition) and two degrees of difficulty (conflict condition) in 27 patients with ALS with no reported symptoms suggestive of cognitive impairment and 26 matched control participants. FINDINGS:Using a modified ANT that accounted for ALS-induced motor impairment by focusing on relative reaction times, we could demonstrate its feasibility even in severely paralyzed patients. Relative reaction time differences were comparable to controls, demonstrating the task's ability to correct for motor bias. When focusing on relative reaction times, in both groups we found intact executive and conflict effects. Furthermore, ALS patients had comparable task accuracies when reacting to congruent and incongruent easy targets. However, the task accuracy of ALS patients was significantly lower compared to controls when reacting to the incongruent hard target. This effect was enhanced by the interaction effect of ALS diagnosis and age. CONCLUSION:Our results suggest a significant interaction between age and ALS pathology, potentially leading to a breakdown of cognitive resources at higher levels of executive demand. We hypothesize that subclinical executive vulnerability in ALS patients becomes apparent when additional detrimental factors, such as aging, are present in patients. While we did not test co-pathologies in our cohort, co-occurring neurodegenerative or vascular processes might have contributed to this result. Our findings highlight the importance of cognitive screening for ALS patients above 60 years, even in the absence of subjective and collateral history of cognitive impairment.

A 76-year-old man developed progressive motor weakness, bulbar symptoms and hand muscle atrophy, initially suspected to be due to motor neurone disease. Unexpected findings on cardiological evaluation identified amyloidosis, and genetic testing confirmed the TTR p.Val50Met mutation, indicating late-onset hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis with a mixed neuropathic and cardiac phenotype. The diagnosis was delayed and complicated by minimal sensory symptoms and the atypical presentation.

ABSTRACT Phosphorylated tau181 (p‐tau181), an Alzheimer's disease biomarker, was recently evaluated in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). We investigated plasma p‐tau181 in 202 ALS/ALS‐FTD patients and 94 healthy controls, assessing cognitive performance, motor function, and longitudinal dynamics. Plasma p‐tau181 and NfL were significantly elevated in ALS, with p‐tau181 increasing over 1 year while NfL remained stable. Neither marker correlated with cognitive performance, and only NfL was associated with disease severity and progression. Plasma p‐tau181 was higher in patients with predominant lower motor neuron involvement. The results indicate that p‐tau181 reflects peripheral processes in ALS, providing a complementary, mechanistically distinct biomarker from NfL.

BackgroundDefining motor phenotypes in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is important for individualized care and optimal therapeutic trial design. The "ALS-OPM" classification is based on the onset region (O), the propagation of motor symptoms (P), and the degree of clinical upper (UMN) and/or lower (LMN) motor neuron dysfunction (M).MethodsAn international ALS expert focus group was held in September 2025, followed by a consensus process through which revisions of the OPM classification were finalized.ResultsOnset (O1-4) identifies first motor symptoms as relating to the head (O1), distal/proximal arm (O2d/p), respiratory/axial trunk (O3r/a), or distal/proximal leg (O4d/p). Onset symptoms are defined by weakness or slowed, poorly coordinated voluntary movements in the muscles of the head, arm, trunk, or leg, including dysarthria, dysphagia, dysphonia, dyspnea, and axial instability. Propagation (P1(n)) or absence of propagation (P0(n)) of motor symptoms from the onset region to another body region are designated, where n denotes the number of months from onset to propagation or assessment. The degree of UMN dysfunction (slowed, poorly coordinated voluntary movements, hyperreflexia and/or spastic muscle tone, emotional lability) and/or LMN dysfunction (weakness with associated muscle atrophy) is classified as follows: balanced UMN and LMN dysfunction (M0); dominant (M1d) or pure UMN dysfunction (M1p); dominant (M2d) or pure LMN dysfunction (M2p); and dissociated UMN/LMN dysfunction (M3), in which the arms and legs predominantly show LMN and UMN involvement, respectively.ConclusionThe revised ALS-OPM classification aims to make it routine, practical and feasible to capture phenotype in clinical practice and therapeutic trials.

Objective: To define the minimum important slowing (MIS) of ALS progression that patients would expect from disease-modifying drug treatment in ALS. Methods: In a survey of ALS patients, the MIS in ALS progression (change in the ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised, ALSFRS-R) was assessed by asking: "At what point of slowing of ALS, as determined by the ALSFRS-R, do you consider a drug to be important?" Data were collected during clinic visits or remotely via the ALS App. Participants were differentiated in the prognostic groups of slower (<0.5), intermediate (≥0.5 and ≤1.0), or faster (>1.0) ALS progression (ALSPR; ALSFRS-R/month). Results: Of 522 participants (ALS App, n = 397; clinic, n = 125), 395 (75.7%) completed the survey, while 127 (24.3%) selected the option "cannot estimate". The distribution of MIS was as follows: modest slowing of ALS progression (5% and 10% slowing, n = 146 patients, 36.9%), moderate slowing (20%, 30%, and 40% slowing, n = 135, 34.2%), and major slowing (≥50% slowing, n = 114, 28.9%). Median MIS was 20% (IQR 10-50%). Patients with faster ALSPR more frequently assessed a major slowing as the MIS (n = 18, 36.0%) compared to those with slower ALSPR (n = 54, 25.2%). Conclusion: A considerable number of participants viewed a modest slowing in ALS progression as the MIS, followed closely by preferences for moderate and major slowing. Expectations varied according to patients' individual ALS progression. These insights may inform the design of future clinical trials in ALS. Study limitations include potential selection and response biases, as well as the predominantly remote digital assessment.

Sleep alterations have been described in several neurodegenerative diseases yet are currently poorly characterized in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). This study investigates sleep macroarchitecture and related hypothalamic signaling disruptions in ALS. Using polysomnography, we found that both patients with ALS as well as asymptomatic C9ORF72 and SOD1 mutation carriers exhibited increased wakefulness and reduced non–rapid eye movement sleep. Increased wakefulness correlated with diminished cognitive performance in both clinical cohorts. Similar changes in sleep macroarchitecture were observed in three ALS mouse models ( Sod1 G86R , Fus Δ NLS/+ , and TDP43 Q331K ). A single oral administration of a dual-orexin receptor antagonist or intracerebroventricular delivery of melanin-concentrating hormone (MCH) through an osmotic pump over 15 days partially normalized sleep patterns in mouse models. MCH treatment did not extend the survival of Sod1 G86R mice but did decrease the loss of lumbar motor neurons. These findings suggest MCH and orexin signaling as potential targets to treat sleep alterations that arise in early stages of the disease.

In genetic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), the clinical phenotypes, disease progression and neurofilament light chain (NfL) levels are incompletely characterized. In a total cohort of 1988 ALS patients, a subcohort of genetic ALS linked to C9orf72 (n = 137), SOD1 (n = 54), TARDBP (n = 27), and FUS (n = 19) was investigated. The phenotypes of onset region, propagation and motor neuron involvement were analyzed according to the OPM classification. Serum NfL (sNfL) was measured and related to ALS progression (ALSPR, monthly change of ALS Functional Rating Scale–Revised). To quantify NfL elevation relative to ALSPR, the logNfL(index), the log-transformed ratio of sNfL to ALSPR was calculated. C9orf72-associated ALS showed frequent bulbar onset (n = 42.6

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis is an incurable neurodegenerative disease that is fatal with a median of 3-4 years. It is characterized by degeneration of the first and second motor neurons. In addition to physical limitations, neuropsychological abnormalities occur in more than 50% of cases. This leads to a rapid loss of autonomy and increases the need for care. An individual prognosis for the course of the disease, in particular the development of cognitive and behavioural abnormalities, is not yet possible As part of our investigations, we focused on cognitive performance and behavioural abnormalities measured by the Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioural ALS Screen in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and investigated possible prognostic biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid as well as modifiable factors such as nutrition and lung function. A retrospective data analysis of 99 patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis cases examined between 2018 and 2021 at the Department for Neurodegenerative Diseases and Gerontopsychiatry at the University Hospital of Bonn, using Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioural ALS Screen, revealed that elevated levels of total tau and phospho-tau 181 were associated with diminished performance of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis on the Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioural ALS Screen. Additionally, weight loss during the course of the disease has been observed to have a deleterious impact on cognitive performance. Moreover, we were able to demonstrate a previously insufficiently described correlation between abnormalities in the Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioural ALS Screen and low-normal thiamine levels in serum. The hypothesis that reduced lung function has a negative effect on cognitive performance was not supported by our findings. The initial onset of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, whether bulbar or spinal, does not appear to affect cognition and behaviour measured using Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioural ALS Screen. Furthermore, our findings confirm the utility of the Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioural ALS Screen in identifying a behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients who have been previously diagnosed by experienced neurologists using the Rascovsky criteria. This development facilitates a more precise utilization of complex diagnostic instruments. Our results provide insight into the prognosis of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in terms of cognitive performance and behavioural abnormalities as the disease progresses, as well as potential therapeutic approaches to stabilize and support neuropsychological abnormalities. The importance of total tau as a widely available prognostic marker should be emphasized. Additionally, new avenues of research are emerging, particularly regarding the role of thiamine in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Introduction/Aims: Serum cardiac troponin T (cTnT) levels are elevated in the majority of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients and increase over time. Neurofilament light chain (NfL) is an established therapy response biomarker in ALS as superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1)-ALS patients treated with the antisense oligonucleotide tofersen show a decrease in NfL. In this study we assess the course of cTnT levels in SOD1-ALS at baseline and during tofersen treatment. Methods: Serum cTnT was analyzed at baseline and during tofersen treatment in 23 SOD1-ALS patients at two specialized ALS centers in Germany and compared to a control cohort of 74 ALS patients without SOD1-mutations and not treated with tofersen. Results: cTnT levels increased in the control ALS-cohort over time (p<0.0001) but not in the tofersen group (p=0.36). CK, and CK-MB levels did not show relevant changes over time. The median monthly increase of cTnT was 0.045 points (IQR 0.02-0.08) in the control ALS cohort and 0.01 points (IQR -0.01-0.03) in the tofersen group (p=0.0013). The fold change in cTnT levels of the tofersen- treated cohort (median 1.2; IQR 0.77-1.59) was significantly less and even showed a reduction in some patients compared to the control group (median 1.89; IQR 1.35-2.75) (p=0.0003). Discussion: In this study, we find a response signal of cTnT to tofersen treatment, which supports the value of cTnT as an independent biomarker in ALS. These results contribute to the notion that cTnT may provide additional value as a progression and treatment response biomarker in ALS complementary to NfL and warrant further investigations. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. ### Funding Statement This study did not receive any funding ### Author Declarations I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained. Yes The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below: This study is a retrospective analysis using clinical routine data (Bonn) and data from the "APST-registry study", and "NfL-ALS"-study in Berlin. As the laboratory measurements were part of the routine clinical work-up and retrospectively analysed in Bonn, no formal consent was needed per statement of our institutional ethics review board of Bonn University Hospital (Ethics Board decision letter 324/20; ethical approval was waived). The study protocol "APST registry study" was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany, under numbers EA2/168/20 and EA1/219/15 (for the sub-study of platform-based sNfL data management, "NfL-ALS"). I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals. Yes I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance). Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable. Yes All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the author

A unifying mechanistic cause for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) remains uncertain. Multiple pathophysiological processes appear to occur simultaneously. Cannabinoids, including delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), cannabidiol (CBD), cannabigerol (CBG), and others found in cannabis, and cannabis extracts (CEs), appear to have activity in these pathogenic pathways, which have led to increasing interest in cannabinoids as therapeutic agents for ALS. The use of cannabinoids as a treatment strategy is substantiated by preclinical evidence suggesting a role for the endocannabinoid system (ECS) in ALS and other neurodegenerative disorders. Preclinical data indicate that cannabis and CEs have powerful antioxidative, anti-inflammatory, and neuroprotective effects in the SOD1 G93A mouse model of ALS. The use of CEs in SOD1 G93A murine models has been shown to prolong neuronal cell survival, which leads to delayed onset of the disease state, and slows progression of the disease. Although research in humans remains limited, a few studies suggest that cannabis and CBD, in humans, provide benefits for both motor symptoms, including rigidity, cramps, and fasciculations, and non-motor symptoms including sleep quality, pain, emotional state, quality of life, and depression. There remains a need for further, well-designed clinical trials to validate further the use of an individual cannabinoid, or a combination of cannabinoids, as a disease-modifying therapy for ALS.

OBJECTIVE:Tofersen is the first effective and approved therapy for superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1)-associated amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS [SOD1-ALS]). Following treatment with tofersen, neurofilament levels in patients' cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serum seem to respond earlier than clinical parameters. This evidence prompted us to hypothesize that this novel treatment could provide an opportunity to identify additional biomarkers responsive to therapy in SOD1-ALS. METHODS:We investigated a panel of 120 neural, glial, and inflammatory markers in CSF and serum samples longitudinally collected from a total of 28 SOD1-ALS patients at baseline, and after 3, 6 and 12 months of treatment with tofersen, followed by validation with conventional methodology. RESULTS:We identified a set of proteins, including neurofilament light chain, neurofilament heavy chain, amyloid-beta 1-40 and amyloid-beta 1-42, neuropeptide Y (NPY), and ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCHL1), whose CSF levels both differed between SOD1-ALS and the control group, and were responsive to tofersen at 3 and 6 months after treatment initiation. Another group of markers, including the neuropentraxin (NPTX) family members NPTX1, NPTX2 and NPTXR, did not separate untreated SOD1-ALS from controls, but was responsive to tofersen. At 12 months on tofersen the levels of neurofilament light chain, neurofilament heavy chain, NPTX1, NPTX2, and NPTXR remained reduced compared with baseline, and correlated with the clinical response to tofersen. Consistent with increasing CSF pleocytosis and intrathecal immunoglobulin production, inflammatory markers were significantly increased after 12 months of treatment. INTERPRETATION:Our results highlight a complex, time-dependent differential response of CSF biomarkers to tofersen treatment, and may pave the way for developing a panel of responsive proteins to make biomarker endpoints more robust in clinical trials for SOD1-ALS and beyond. ANN NEUROL 2025;98:1318-1334.

In amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), heterogeneity of motor phenotypes is a fundamental hallmark of the disease. Distinct ALS phenotypes were associated with a different progression and survival. Despite its relevance for clinical practice and research, there is no broader consensus on the classification of ALS phenotypes. An expert consensus process for the classification of ALS motor phenotypes was performed from May 2023 to December 2024. A three-determinant anatomical classification was proposed which is based on the (1) region of onset (O), (2) the propagation of motor symptoms (P), and (3) the degree of upper (UMN) and/or lower motor neuron (LMN) dysfunction (M). Accordingly, this classification is referred to as the “OPM classification”. Onset phenotypes differentiate the site of first motor symptoms: O1) head onset; O2d) distal arm onset; O2p) proximal arm onset; O3r) trunk respiratory onset; O3a) trunk axial onset; O4d) distal leg onset; O4p) proximal leg onset. Propagation phenotypes differentiate the temporal propagation of motor symptoms from the site of onset to another, vertically distant body region: PE) earlier propagation (within 12 months of symptom onset); PL) later propagation (without propagation within 12 months of symptom onset), including the established phenotypes of “progressive bulbar paralysis” (O1, PL), “flail-arm syndrome” (O2p, PL), and “flail-leg syndrome” (O4d, PL); PN) propagation not yet classifiable as time since symptom onset is less than 12 months. Phenotypes of motor neuron dysfunction differentiate the degree of UMN and/or LMN dysfunction: M0) balanced UMN and LMN dysfunction; M1d) dominant UMN dysfunction; M1p) pure UMN dysfunction (“primary lateral sclerosis”, PLS); M2d) dominant LMN dysfunction; M2p) pure LMN dysfunction (“progressive muscle atrophy”, PMA); M3) dissociated motor neuron dysfunction with dominant LMN and UMN dysfunction of the arms and legs (“brachial amyotrophic spastic paraparesis”), respectively. This consensus process aimed to standardize the clinical description of ALS motor phenotypes in clinical practice and research – based on the onset region, propagation pattern, and motor neuron dysfunction. This “OPM classification” contributes to specifying the prognosis, to defining the inclusion or stratification criteria in clinical trials and to correlate phenotypes with the underlying disease mechanisms of ALS.

OBJECTIVE:To investigate self-assessment of the amyotrophic lateral sclerosis functional rating scale-revised (ALSFRS-R) using the patient's smartphone and to analyze non-inferiority to clinic assessment. METHODS:In an observational study, ALSFRS-R data being remotely collected on a mobile application (App-ALSFRS-R) were compared to ALSFRS-R captured during clinic visits (clinic-ALSFRS-R). ALS progression rate (ALSPR)-as calculated by the monthly decline of ALSFRS-R-and its intrasubject variability (ALSPR-ISV) between ratings were used to compare both cohorts. To investigate non-inferiority of App-ALSFRS-R data, a non-inferiority margin was determined. RESULTS:A total of 691 ALS patients using the ALS-App and 1895 patients with clinic assessments were included. Clinical characteristics for the App-ALSFRS-R and clinic-ALSFRS-R cohorts were as follows: Mean age 60.45 (SD 10.43) and 63.69 (SD 11.30) years (p < 0.001), disease duration 38.7 (SD 37.68) and 56.75 (SD 54.34) months (p < 0.001) and ALSPR 0.72 and 0.59 (p < 0.001), respectively. A paired sample analysis of ALSPR-ISV was applicable for 398 patients with clinic as well as app assessments and did not show a significant difference (IQR 0.12 [CI 0.11, 0.14] vs 0.12 [CI 0.11, 0.14], p = 0.24; Cohen's d = 0.06). CI of IQR for App-ALSFRS-R was below the predefined non-inferiority margin of 0.15 IQR, demonstrating non-inferiority. CONCLUSIONS:Patients using a mobile application for remote digital self-assessment of the ALSFRS-R revealed younger age, earlier disease course, and faster ALS progression. The finding of non-inferiority of App-ALSFRS-R assessments underscores, that data collection using the ALS-App on the patient's smartphone can serve as additional source of ALSFRS-R in ALS research and clinical practice.

Background: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) exhibit significant clinical, genetic and neuropathological abnormalities, and are regarded as belonging to a common disease spectrum, referred to as the ALS-FTD spectrum disorders. Our understanding of the underlying mechanisms of these diseases has advanced significantly, including molecular neuropathology, genetics and molecular pathophysiology. The heterogeneity of these diseases poses significant challenges to translational research and drug development, particularly in sporadic cases. Consequently, there is an urgent need to improve patient stratification for the successful execution of future clinical trials. Methods/Results: We here describe the study design of the DESCRIBE-ALS/FTD study which aims to address this research gap by undertaking a systematic sampling of patients from the ALS FTD spectrum, encompassing all possible disease variants. The main objective of the study is to systematically document detailed cross-sectional phenotyping and the temporal progression of motor and neuropsychological abnormalities that occur in both ALS and FTD. Additionally, it seeks to systematically correlate these abnormalities with genetics and potentially predictive biomarkers including longitudinal biomaterial sampling, brain imaging and brain banking. Furthermore, first-degree relatives of patients with disease-causing gene variants undergo the same assessments to also sample presymptomatic risk gene carriers. Conclusion: With this prospective registry study we aim to generate datasets which will help researchers identifying different disease traits in people with sporadic and genetic ALS and FTD and to develop biomarkers to identify preclinical and prodromal disease stages.

BACKGROUND:In amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), dextromethorphan/quinidine (DMQ) has been reported to reduce bulbar symptoms, including dysarthria and dysphagia. However, data on patients' perceptions of DMQ treatment are limited. METHODS:Data on DMQ treatment were collected from 1065 ALS patients treated at 13 ALS centers between 10-2015 and 06-2025. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) of 179 participants were remotely assessed via the "ALS App". PROM included the self-explanatory version of the ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R-SE), the Net Promoter Score (NPS); and Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-9). RESULTS:Mean disease duration was 29.3 months (SD 38.1). ALS progression before treatment was 0.82 points/month (ALSFRS-R). Mean DMQ treatment duration was 8.4 months (SD 10.8), including 35.2% (n = 374) of shorter (<3 months), 35.3% (n = 375) of longer (3-9 months), and 29.5% (n = 313) of very long DMQ treatment (>9 months). Patients' recommendation (n = 178) was positive (NPS: +23) with higher scores after very long DMQ treatment (NPS +37) compared to longer (NPS +15) and shorter treatment (NPS +7.5), respectively. TSQM-9 scores (n = 163) demonstrated high satisfaction for effectiveness 60.0 (SD 25.9), convenience 73.8 (SD 18.2), and global satisfaction 63.4 (SD 29.8). INTERPRETATION:The positive perception in PROM underscores the value of DMQ as an individualized treatment option for bulbar symptoms in ALS. However, shortage of clinical data, online assessment, and selection biases are among the limitations of this study that need to be addressed in further investigations.