Background: Adenovirus-vectored vaccines played an important role in the global response to SARS-CoV-2. Adenovirus platforms have many advantages including a simple and readily transferred manufacturing process, low cost, and thermostability. Speed of production of an initial Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP)-compliant batch has, however, been viewed as a limitation of adenovirus vectors relative to mRNA platforms. Production of the initial viral starting material and release testing are key rate-limiting steps. Methods: Production of viral starting material from DNA, and release testing in accordance with regulatory expectations, for first-in-human trials of adenovirus-vectored vaccines. Results: We describe experience of these stages in the production of the first GMP batches for multiple adenovirus-vectored candidates and the adaptations made for ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (the Oxford COVID-19 vaccine) in early 2020. We also report development of a streamlined approach to starting material generation, enabling initial GMP batch availability within c. 60 days of publication of a new pathogen sequence. Using a New World arenavirus vaccine construct as a proof of concept, we demonstrate reproducible execution of this pipeline, maintaining acceptable infectivity and other quality attributes. Conclusions: We discuss opportunities for additional time savings in the future. This work demonstrates suitability of an adenovirus platform to contribute to the “100 Days Mission” for vaccines against “Disease X”.

Global WHO data indicate that Sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries, such as Kenya, experienced reduced coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) severe-morbidity and mortality burdens relative to their more affluent counterparts in Europe, Asia, and North America. We analysed peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) samples collected from Kenya and Sweden before and during COVID-19. Pre-COVID-19 samples were available for 80 adults and 10 infants from Kenya, and 20 adults from Sweden. COVID-19 samples were available for 39 Kenyan adults. The samples were analysed for ex vivo IFN-γ secretion using an Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent (ELISpot) assay following in vitro stimulations with overlapping SARS-CoV-2 spike-protein peptides. T-cells expressing IFN-γ, IL-2, TNF-α, CD154, and CD107a were assessed following similar stimulations, using intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) and multiparameter flow cytometry. 55.7

BACKGROUND:ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222) vaccine was widely deployed to protect against severe COVID-19 in adults, but the relationship between pre-existing immunity to human seasonal coronaviruses (HCoVs) and vaccine-induced SARS-CoV-2 (SCoV2) response across age groups remains unclear. METHODS:We analysed SCoV2 and HCoVs antibody profiles in UK volunteers (aged 6-≥70), assessing antibody levels, avidity, and FcγR binding after receiving one or two doses of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19. Adult cohorts from trials in Brazil and Kenya were also included to evaluate geographical impacts on baseline HCoVs and SCoV2 induced response. FINDINGS:In the UK cohort, younger individuals had higher SCoV2 IgG, avidity, FcγR binding and cross-reactivity, particularly towards OC43 and HKU1. The greatest differences were seen after the first dose of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, but these effects diminished after the second dose. Although baseline HCoVs IgG varied geographically, similar trends were observed across adult cohorts with younger adults showing higher SCoV2 IgG compared to older adults (UK and Brazil). INTERPRETATION:These findings contribute to a better understanding of the immunogenicity of ChAdOx1-based vaccines in various age groups. Determining whether this applies across other vaccines using same platform is essential for evaluating the viability of one-dose regimens in outbreak responses. FUNDING:The clinical trials COV002, COV003, COV004, and COV006 were made possible by funding from Astra Zeneca, the NIHR and the University of Oxford, UK Department of Health and Social Care, through the UK National Institute for Health and Care Research, the Wellcome Trust (220991), and Innovate UK (project 971614).

Introduction:Rift Valley fever (RVF) is an epidemic-prone zoonotic disease whose distribution of exposure is poorly described in endemic communities. We investigated the seroprevalence and risk factors for RVF among humans in Uganda's cattle corridor. Methods:This cross-sectional study used data and stored plasma specimens collected by the Uganda population-based HIV impact assessment (UPHIA) survey 2016/2017. Participants were sampled from 35 districts of the cattle corridor. Ethical and regulatory approvals were obtained to use the UPHIA data and to test the specimens for the presence of RVF anti-Gn glycoprotein immunoglobulin G (anti-Gn IgG) antibodies using an enzyme linked immunosorbent Assay (ELISA). RVF seroprevalence was calculated in Stata with household as the random intercept, and associations between potential determinants and RVF seropositivity were assessed using mixed effects logistic regression analysis. Results:Overall, 267 households comprising 1319 individuals were included in the analysis. Over half (56.3%) of the participants were female, median age 22 (IQR 11-34) years. Most (84.2%) were rural and owned cattle (41.2%), sheep/goats (51.7%) and poultry (65%). The overall RVF seroprevalence was 10.24%, 95% CI 8.63% to 12.10%. RVF seropositivity was associated with advanced age (25-44 years adjusted OR 2.79 (95% CI 1.81 to 4.32); and 45-64 years (3.0 (95% CI 1.76 to 5.14)); ethnicity (Iteso 2.54 (95% CI 1.15 to 5.62), Langi 2.61 (95% CI 1.20 to 5.66) and Karamojong 3.70 (95% CI 1.61 to 8.47)); owning cattle (1.59 (95% CI 1.03 to 2.45)) and owning poultry (1.73 (95% CI 1.05 to 2.87)). Conclusions:RVF seropositivity is common among humans in Uganda's cattle corridor and the risk of exposure is mostly determined by increasing age, ethnicity, owning cattle and poultry. Future RVF seroprevalence and risk evaluation studies should include poultry as potential determinants of infection.

BACKGROUND:Heterologous schedules of booster vaccines for COVID-19 following initial doses of mRNA or adenoviral vector vaccines have been shown to be safe and immunogenic. There are few data on booster doses following initial doses of protein nanoparticle vaccines. METHODS:Participants of the phase 3 clinical trial of the COVID-19 vaccine NVX-CoV2373 (EudraCT 2020-004123-16) enroled between September 28 and November 28, 2020, who received 2 doses of NVX-CoV2373 administered 21 days apart were invited to receive a third dose booster vaccine of BNT162b2 (wild type mRNA vaccine) as a sub-study of the COV-BOOST clinical trial, and were followed up for assessment of safety, reactogenicity and immunogenicity to day 242 post-booster. RESULTS:The BNT162b2 booster following two doses of NVX-COV2373 was well-tolerated. Most adverse events were mild to moderate, with no serious vaccine-related adverse events reported. Immunogenicity analysis showed a significant increase in spike IgG titres and T-cell responses post-third dose booster. Specifically, IgG levels peaked at day 14 with a geometric mean concentration (GMC) of 216,255 ELISA laboratory units (ELU)/mL (95% CI 191,083-244,743). The geometric mean fold increase from baseline to day 28 post-boost was 168.6 (95% CI 117.5-241.8). Spike IgG titres were sustained above baseline levels at day 242 with a GMC of 58,686 ELU/mL (95% CI 48,954-74,652), with significant decay between days 28 and 84 (geometric mean ratio 0.58, 95% CI 0.53-0.63). T-cell responses also demonstrated enhancement post-booster, with a geometric mean fold increase of 5.1 (95% CI 2.9-9.0) at day 14 in fresh samples and 3.0 (95% CI 1.8-4.9) in frozen samples as measured by ELISpot. In an exploratory analysis, participants who received BNT162b2 after two doses of NVX-COV2373 exhibited higher anti-spike IgG at Day 28 than those who received homologous three doses of BNT162b2, with a GMR of 5.02 (95% CI: 3.17-7.94). This trend remained consistent across all time points, indicating a similar decay rate between the two schedules. CONCLUSIONS:A BNT162b2 third dose booster dose in individuals primed with two doses of NVX-COV2373 is safe and induces strong and durable immunogenic responses, higher than seen in other comparable studies. These findings support the use and investigation of heterologous booster strategies and early investigation of heterologous vaccine technology schedules should be a priority in the development of vaccines against new pathogens.

BACKGROUND:Rift Valley fever (RVF) is an outbreak-prone viral zoonosis, with no vaccine available for human use. We aimed to assess the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of the ChAdOx1 RVF candidate vaccine among healthy adults in an RVF-endemic setting in Uganda. METHODS:We conducted a single-centre, single-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation, phase 1 trial in Masaka, southwestern Uganda. Healthy, non-pregnant adults aged 18-50 years who resided in the clinical site's service area, did not have serum antibodies against the RVF virus nucleoprotein, and had not previously received other adenovirus-vectored vaccines were eligible for inclusion. Participants were sequentially enrolled into three dose groups (group 1 [5·0 × 109 virus particles]; group 2 [2·5 × 1010 virus particles]; or group 3 [5·0 × 1010 virus particles]) and randomly assigned to vaccine or placebo in a 2:1 (group 1) or 5:1 (groups 2 and 3) ratio by use of permuted blocks. Participants received a single intramuscular dose of the ChAdOx1 RVF vaccine or saline placebo in the non-dominant deltoid. Participants were masked to the intervention administered; however, all study staff were unmasked. Coprimary outcomes were the number, proportion, and severity of local and systemic solicited reactogenicity adverse events within the first 7 days and of unsolicited adverse events within 28 days following vaccination in the vaccine and placebo groups, analysed by intention to treat. The secondary outcomes were humoral and cellular immunity to RVF virus glycoproteins. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04672824) and is closed to recruitment. FINDINGS:Between May 5, 2022, and Sept 29, 2022, 30 participants were enrolled, of whom 24 (80%) were men and six (20%) were women (median age 25 years [IQR 22-33]). Adverse events were mostly mild or moderate and self-limiting. Local solicited adverse events were reported in 17 (71%) of 24 vaccine recipients and in no placebo recipients. The most frequently reported local solicited adverse events were injection site pain (one [25%] of four in group 1, five [50%] of ten in group 2, and seven [70%] of ten in group 3); warmth (two [50%] in group 1, three [30%] in group 2, and two [20%] in group 3); and itching (none in group 1, three [30%] in group 2, and two [20%] in group 3). Systemic solicited adverse events were reported in 20 (83%) vaccine recipients and in five (83%) of six placebo recipients. The most commonly reported systemic solicited adverse events were chills (three [75%] of four vaccine recipients vs one [50%] of two placebo recipients) in group 1; fever (two [20%] of ten vs none) and myalgia (four [40%] vs none) in group 2; and fever (four [40%] of ten vs none), headache (six [60%] vs one [50%] of two), fatigue (seven [70%] vs one [50%]), and malaise (seven [70%] vs one [50%]) in group 3. No serious adverse events were reported. By day 14, neutralising antibodies were detected in three (75%) of four individuals in group 1, nine (90%) of ten in group 2, and nine (90%) of ten in group 3. Highest antibody responses were sustained at day 28 (ten [100%]) and at day 84 (nine [90%]) in group 3. By day 14, anti-Gn and Gc immunoglobulin G responses in group 3 preceded other doses, whereas interferon-γ T-cell responses peaked for all doses, preceding the antibody peaks. INTERPRETATION:A single dose of ChAdOx1 RVF vaccine seemed to be safe, tolerable, and immunogenic in healthy adults in an RVF-endemic setting, eliciting humoral and cellular immunity. Further evaluation of the 5·0 × 1010 dose in larger and more diverse populations in areas susceptible to outbreaks is warranted. FUNDING:UK Department of Health and Social Care through the UK Vaccines Network.

Objective: To address that, despite widespread use of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222) as a COVID-2019 booster, fourth-dose clinical outcomes data are limited. We report immunogenicity and safety for ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 as a homologous fourth-dose booster. Participants and Methods: Participants (aged ≥18 years) who had received 2 doses of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 in phase 3 COV003 trial in Brazil were offered a third dose after a planned dose interval from 11 to 13 months and a fourth dose after a planned interval from 6 to 15 months (both 5 × 1010 viral particles). All fourth doses were administered to substudy participants between August 18 and October 28, 2022. The data cutoff was December 9, 2022. The primary immunogenicity outcome was noninferiority of ancestral severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV)-2–neutralizing antibody responses 28 days after dose 4 versus dose 3. Solicited and unsolicited adverse events were recorded 7 and 28 days postdose 4, respectively. Results: 172 participants received a fourth dose (median interval postthird dose, 10.7 months). Ancestral SARS-CoV-2–neutralizing antibody titers postdose 4 were noninferior to those postdose 3; geometric mean fold rise was 1.9 (95% CI, 1.6-2.4; n=112). Immunogenicity results were consistent across all variants analyzed. Local and systemic solicited adverse events were reported in 60.3% (n=35/58) and 43.1% (n=25/58) of participants, respectively. Conclusion: Immune responses after a fourth dose of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 were noninferior to those after a third dose across SARS-CoV-2 variants. The fourth dose was well tolerated with no emergent safety concerns, supporting the continued development of the ChAdOx1 platform in preparation for future pandemics. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT04536051

BACKGROUND:Malaria remains a substantial public health burden among young children in sub-Saharan Africa and a highly efficacious vaccine eliciting a durable immune response would be a useful tool for controlling malaria. R21 is a malaria vaccine comprising nanoparticles, formed from a circumsporozoite protein and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) fusion protein, without any unfused HBsAg, and is administered with the saponin-based Matrix-M adjuvant. This study aimed to assess the safety and immunogenicity of the malaria vaccine candidate, R21, administered with or without adjuvant Matrix-M in adults naïve to malaria infection and in healthy adults from malaria endemic areas. METHODS:In this Article we report two phase 1, first-in-human trials. The first trial was a phase 1a open-label study in the UK evaluating the safety and immunogenicity of R21 administered either alone, or with 50 μg of Matrix-M. The second trial was a phase 1b randomised controlled trial in Burkina Faso. Adults had to be aged 18-50 years for enrolment in the phase 1a trial, and 18-45 years in the phase 1b trial. The phase 1a trial doses were 2 μg, 10 μg, and 50 μg R21/Matrix-M, and 50 μg R21 only. The phase 1b trial doses were 10 μg R21/Matrix-M and saline placebo. Matrix-M was always dosed at 50 μg. Phase 1b implemented block randomisation by randomisation into study groups by an independent statistician based at the University of Oxford using a randomisation code list with allocation concealment using opaque sealed envelopes. The primary objective of the phase 1a trial was to assess the safety and tolerability of R21 with and without Matrix-M. The primary objective of the phase 1b trial was to assess the safety and tolerability of R21 with Matrix-M. Both trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02572388 for phase 1a and NCT02925403 for phase 1b, and are completed. FINDINGS:Between Oct 1, 2015, and Jan 3, 2017, 31 individuals were enrolled in the phase 1a study. Six individuals were assigned to receive 2 μg R21/Matrix-M, 11 to 10 μg R21/Matrix-M, ten to 50 μg R21/Matrix-M, and four to 50 μg R21 only. Between Aug 26, 2016, and Sept 28, 2017, 13 individuals were enrolled in the phase 1b study. Eight individuals were assigned to receive 10 μg R21/Matrix-M, and five to placebo. Vaccinations were well tolerated, and most local and systemic adverse events were mild. There were no serious adverse events deemed related to vaccination. Two serious adverse events occurred. The first in the 10 μg R21/Matrix-M group was worsening of previously undisclosed or undiagnosed palindromic rheumatism and was deemed unlikely to be related to vaccination and the second in the 2 μg R21/Matrix-M was hospital admission for an unplanned excision of a pre-existing Bartholin's cyst, also unrelated to vaccination. In the phase 1a study, a total of 21 adverse events were recorded in the 2 μg R21/Matrix-M group, 103 in the 10 μg R21/Matrix-M group, 94 in the 50 μg R21/Matrix-M group, and 21 in the 50 μg R21 alone group. In the phase 1b study, twelve adverse events were recorded in the 10 μg R21/Matrix-M group and 0 in the placebo group. INTERPRETATION:R21 with Matrix-M adjuvant has an acceptable safety profile. These data have formed the basis for efficacy testing of this vaccine. FUNDING:The European Commission Framework 7 and The European & Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership.

IntroductionMycobacteria are known to exert a range of heterologous effects on the immune system. The mycobacteria-based Freund’s Complete Adjuvant is a potent non-specific stimulator of the immune response used in immunization protocols promoting antibody production, and Mycobacterium bovis Bacille Calmette Guérin (BCG) vaccination has been linked with decreased morbidity and mortality beyond the specific protection it provides against tuberculosis (TB) in some populations and age groups. The role of heterologous antibodies in this phenomenon, if any, remains unclear and under-studied.MethodsWe set out to evaluate antibody responses to a range of unrelated pathogens following infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M.tb) and vaccination with BCG or a candidate TB vaccine, MTBVAC, in non-human primates.ResultsWe demonstrate a significant increase in the titer of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2, cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, tetanus toxoid, and respiratory syncytial virus antigens following low-dose aerosol infection with M.tb. The magnitude of some of these responses correlated with TB disease severity. However, vaccination with BCG administered by the intradermal, intravenous or aerosol routes, or intradermal delivery of MTBVAC, did not increase antibody responses against unrelated pathogens.DiscussionOur findings suggest that it is unlikely that heterologous antibodies contribute to the non-specific effects of these vaccines. The apparent dysregulation of B cell responses associated with TB disease warrants further investigation, with potential implications for risk of B cell cancers and novel therapeutic strategies.

Viral haemorrhagic fevers (VHF) pose a significant threat to human health. In recent years, VHF outbreaks caused by Ebola, Marburg and Lassa viruses have caused substantial morbidity and mortality in West and Central Africa. In 2022, an Ebola disease outbreak in Uganda caused by Sudan virus resulted in 164 cases with 55 deaths. In 2023, a Marburg disease outbreak was confirmed in Equatorial Guinea and Tanzania resulting in over 49 confirmed or suspected cases; 41 of which were fatal. There are no clearly defined correlates of protection against these VHF, impeding targeted vaccine development. Any vaccine developed should therefore induce strong and preferably long-lasting humoral and cellular immunity against these viruses. Ideally this immunity should also cross-protect against viral variants, which are known to circulate in animal reservoirs and cause human disease. We have utilized two viral vectored vaccine platforms, an adenovirus (ChAdOx1) and Modified Vaccinia Ankara (MVA), to develop a multi-pathogen vaccine regime against three filoviruses (Ebola virus, Sudan virus, Marburg virus) and an arenavirus (Lassa virus). These platform technologies have consistently demonstrated the capability to induce robust cellular and humoral antigen-specific immunity in humans, most recently in the rollout of the licensed ChAdOx1-nCoV19/AZD1222. Here, we show that our multi-pathogen vaccines elicit strong cellular and humoral immunity, induce a diverse range of chemokines and cytokines, and most importantly, confers protection after lethal Ebola virus, Sudan virus and Marburg virus challenges in a small animal model.

BACKGROUND:Mycobacterium tuberculosis is the main causative agent of tuberculosis. BCG, the only licensed vaccine, provides inadequate protection against pulmonary tuberculosis. Controlled human infection models are useful tools for vaccine development. We aimed to determine a safe dose of aerosol-inhaled live-attenuated Mycobacterium bovis BCG as a surrogate for M tuberculosis infection, then compare the safety and tolerability of infection models established using aerosol-inhaled and intradermally administered BCG. METHODS:This phase 1 controlled human infection trial was conducted at two clinical research facilities in the UK. Healthy, immunocompetent adults aged 18-50 years, who were both M tuberculosis-naive and BCG-naive and had no history of asthma or other respiratory diseases, were eligible for the trial. Participants were initially enrolled into group 1 (receiving the BCG Danish strain); the trial was subsequently paused because of a worldwide shortage of BCG Danish and, after protocol amendment, was restarted using the BCG Bulgaria strain (group 2). After a dose-escalation study, during which participants were sequentially allocated to receive either 1 × 103, 1 × 104, 1 × 105, 1 × 106, or 1 × 107 colony-forming units (CFU) of aerosol BCG, the maximum tolerated dose was selected for the randomised controlled trial. Participants in this trial were randomly assigned (9:12), by variable block randomisation and using sequentially numbered sealed envelopes, to receive aerosol BCG (1 × 107 CFU) and intradermal saline or intradermal BCG (1 × 106 CFU) and aerosol saline. Participants were masked to treatment allocation until day 14. The primary outcome was to compare the safety of a controlled human infection model based on aerosol-inhaled BCG versus one based on intradermally administered BCG, and the secondary outcome was to evaluate BCG recovery in the airways of participants who received aerosol BCG or skin biopsies of participants who received intradermal BCG. BCG was detected by culture and by PCR. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02709278, and is complete. FINDINGS:Participants were assessed for eligibility between April 7, 2016, and Sept 29, 2018. For group 1, 15 participants were screened, of whom 13 were enrolled and ten completed the study; for group 2, 60 were screened and 33 enrolled, all of whom completed the study. Doses up to 1 × 107 CFU aerosol-inhaled BCG were sufficiently well tolerated. No significant difference was observed in the frequency of adverse events between aerosol and intradermal groups (median percentage of solicited adverse events per participant, post-aerosol vs post-intradermal BCG: systemic 7% [IQR 2-11] vs 4% [1-13], p=0·62; respiratory 7% [1-19] vs 4% [1-9], p=0·56). More severe systemic adverse events occurred in the 2 weeks after aerosol BCG (15 [12%] of 122 reported systemic adverse events) than after intradermal BCG (one [1%] of 94; difference 11% [95% CI 5-17]; p=0·0013), but no difference was observed in the severity of respiratory adverse events (two [1%] of 144 vs zero [0%] of 97; 1% [-1 to 3]; p=0·52). All adverse events after aerosol BCG resolved spontaneously. One serious adverse event was reported-a participant in group 2 was admitted to hospital to receive analgesia for a pre-existing ovarian cyst, which was deemed unrelated to BCG infection. On day 14, BCG was cultured from bronchoalveolar lavage samples after aerosol infection and from skin biopsy samples after intradermal infection. INTERPRETATION:This first-in-human aerosol BCG controlled human infection model was sufficiently well tolerated. Further work will evaluate the utility of this model in assessing vaccine efficacy and identifying potential correlates of protection. FUNDING:Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Wellcome Trust, National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Thames Valley Clinical Research Network, and TBVAC2020.

Background There are limited data on the immunogenicity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines in African populations. Here we report the immunogenicity and safety of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222) vaccine from a phase 1/2 single-blind, randomised, controlled trial among adults in Kenya conducted as part of the early studies assessing vaccine performance in different geographical settings to inform Emergency Use Authorisation. Methods We recruited and randomly assigned (1:1) 400 healthy adults aged ≥18 years in Kenya to receive ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 or control rabies vaccine, each as a two-dose schedule with a 3-month interval. The co-primary outcomes were safety, and immunogenicity assessed using total IgG enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein 28 days after the second vaccination. Results Between 28th October 2020 and 19th August 2021, 400 participants were enrolled and assigned to receive ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (n=200) or rabies vaccine (n=200). Local and systemic adverse events were self-limiting and mild or moderate in nature. Three serious adverse events were reported but these were deemed unrelated to vaccination. The geometric mean anti-spike IgG titres 28 days after second dose vaccination were higher in the ChAdOx1 group (2773 ELISA units [EU], 95% CI 2447, 3142) than in the rabies vaccine group (61 EU, 95% CI 45, 81) and persisted over the 12 months follow-up. We did not identify any symptomatic infections or hospital admissions with respiratory illness and so vaccine efficacy against clinically apparent infection could not be measured. Vaccine efficacy against asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection was 38.4% (95% CI -26.8%, 70.1%; p=0.188). Conclusions The safety, immunogenicity and efficacy against asymptomatic infection of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 among Kenyan adults was similar to that observed elsewhere in the world, but efficacy against symptomatic infection or severe disease could not be measured in this cohort. Pan-African Clinical Trials Registration PACTR202005681895696 (11/05/2020)

Background Rift Valley fever is a viral epidemic illness prevalent in Africa that can be fatal or result in debilitating sequelae in humans. No vaccines are available for human use. We aimed to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of a non-replicating simian adenovirus-vectored Rift Valley fever (ChAdOx1 RVF) vaccine in humans.Methods We conducted a phase 1, first-in-human, open-label, dose-escalation trial in healthy adults aged 18-50 years at the Centre for Clinical Vaccinology and Tropical Medicine, Oxford, UK. Participants were required to have no serious comorbidities or previous history of receiving an adenovirus-based vaccine before enrolment. Participants were non-randomly allocated to receive a single ChAdOx1 RVF dose of either 5 x 109 virus particles (vp), 2 & BULL;5 x 1010 vp, or 5 x 1010 vp administered intramuscularly into the deltoid of their non-dominant arm; enrolment was sequential and administration was staggered to allow for safety to be assessed before progression to the next dose. Primary outcome measures were assessment of adverse events and secondary outcome measures were Rift Valley fever neutralising antibody titres, Rift Valley fever GnGc-binding antibody titres (ELISA), and cellular response (ELISpot), analysed in all participants who received a vaccine. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04754776).Findings Between June 11, 2021, and Jan 13, 2022, 15 volunteers received a single dose of either 5 x 109 vp (n=3), 2 & BULL;5 x 1010 vp (n=6), or 5 x 1010 vp (n=6) ChAdOx1 RVF. Nine participants were female and six were male. 14 (93%) of 15 participants reported solicited local adverse reactions; injection-site pain was the most frequent (13 [87%] of 15). Ten (67%) of 15 participants (from the 2 & BULL;5 x 1010 vp and 5 x 1010 vp groups only) reported systemic symptoms, which were mostly mild in intensity, the most common being headache (nine [60%] of 15) and fatigue (seven [47%]). All unsolicited adverse events reported within 28 days were either mild or moderate in severity; gastrointestinal symptoms were the most common reaction (at least possibly related to vaccination), occurring in four (27%) of 15 participants. Transient decreases in total white cell, lymphocyte, or neutrophil counts occurred at day 2 in some participants in the intermediate-dose and high-dose groups. Lymphopenia graded as severe occurred in two participants in the 5 x 1010 vp group at a single timepoint, but resolved at the subsequent follow-up visit. No serious adverse events occurred. Rift Valley fever neutralising antibodies were detectable across all dose groups, with all participants in the 5 x 1010 vp dose group having high neutralising antibody titres that peaked at day 28 after vaccination and persisted through the-month follow-up. High titres of binding IgG targeting Gc glycoprotein were detected whereas those targeting Gn were comparatively low. IFN & gamma; cellular responses against Rift Valley fever Gn and Gc glycoproteins were observed in all participants except one in the 5 x 1010 vp dose group. These IFN & gamma; responses peaked at 2 weeks after vaccination, were highest in the 5 x 1010 vp dose group, and tended to be more frequent against the Gn glycoprotein.Interpretation ChAdOx1 RVF was safe, well tolerated, and immunogenic when administered as a single dose in this study population. The data support further clinical development of ChAdOx1 RVF for human use.Funding UK Department of Health and Social Care through the UK Vaccines Network, Oak Foundation, and the Wellcome Trust. Copyright & COPY; 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license.

Objectives: Many regions of Africa have experienced lower COVID-19 morbidity and mortality than Europe. Pre-existing humoral responses to endemic human coronaviruses (HCoV) may cross-protect against SARS-CoV-2. We investigated the neutralizing capacity of SARS-CoV-2 spike reactive and nonreactive immunoglobulin (Ig)G and IgA antibodies in prepandemic samples. Methods: To investigate the presence of pre-existing immunity, we performed enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using spike antigens from reference SARS-CoV-2, HCoV HKU1, OC43, NL63, and 229E using prepandemic samples from Kilifi in coastal Kenya. In addition, we performed neutralization assays using pseudotyped reference SARS-CoV-2 to determine the functionality of the identified reactive antibodies. Results: We demonstrate the presence of HCoV serum IgG and mucosal IgA antibodies, which cross-react with the SARS-CoV-2 spike. We show pseudotyped reference SARS-CoV-2 neutralization by prepandemic serum, with a mean infective dose 50 of 1: 251, which is 10-fold less than that of the pooled convalescent sera from patients with COVID-19 but still within predicted protection levels. The prepandemic naso-oropharyngeal fluid neutralized pseudo-SARS-CoV-2 at a mean infective dose 50 of 1: 5.9 in the neutralization assay. Conclusion: Our data provide evidence for pre-existing functional humoral responses to SARS-CoV-2 in Kilifi, coastal Kenya and adds to data showing pre-existing immunity for COVID-19 from other regions.

Background: There are limited data on the immunogenicity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines in African populations. Here we report the immunogenicity and safety of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222) vaccine from a phase 1/2 single-blind, randomised, controlled trial among adults in Kenya conducted as part of the early studies assessing vaccine performance in different geographical settings to inform Emergency Use Authorisation. Methods: We recruited and randomly assigned (1:1) 400 healthy adults aged ≥18 years in Kenya to receive ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 or control rabies vaccine, each as a two-dose schedule with a 3-month interval. The co-primary outcomes were safety, and immunogenicity assessed using total IgG enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein 28 days after the second vaccination. Results: Between 28th October 2020 and 19th August 2021, 400 participants were enrolled and assigned to receive ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (n=200) or rabies vaccine (n=200). Local and systemic adverse events were self-limiting and mild or moderate in nature. Three serious adverse events were reported but these were deemed unrelated to vaccination. The geometric mean anti-spike IgG titres 28 days after second dose vaccination were higher in the ChAdOx1 group (2773 ELISA units [EU], 95% CI 2447, 3142) than in the rabies vaccine group (61 EU, 95% CI 45, 81) and persisted over the 12 months follow-up. We did not identify any symptomatic infections or hospital admissions with respiratory illness and so vaccine efficacy against clinically apparent infection could not be measured. Vaccine efficacy against asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection was 38.4% (95% CI -26.8%, 70.1%; p=0.188). Conclusions: The safety, immunogenicity and efficacy against asymptomatic infection of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 among Kenyan adults was similar to that observed elsewhere in the world, but efficacy against symptomatic infection or severe disease could not be measured in this cohort. Pan-African Clinical Trials Registration: PACTR202005681895696 (11/05/2020)

AbstractThe trajectory of immune responses following the primary dose series determines the decline in vaccine effectiveness over time. Here we report on maintenance of immune responses during the year following a two-dose schedule of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19/AZD1222, in the absence of infection, and also explore the decay of antibody after infection. Total spike-specific IgG antibody titres were lower with two low doses of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccines (two low doses) (P = 0.0006) than with 2 standard doses (the approved dose) or low dose followed by standard dose vaccines regimens. Longer intervals between first and second doses resulted in higher antibody titres (P < 0.0001); however, there was no evidence that the trajectory of antibody decay differed by interval or by vaccine dose, and the decay of IgG antibody titres followed a similar trajectory after a third dose of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19. Trends in post-infection samples were similar with an initial rapid decay in responses but good persistence of measurable responses thereafter. Extrapolation of antibody data, following two doses of ChAdOx1 nCov-19, demonstrates a slow rate of antibody decay with modelling, suggesting that antibody titres are well maintained for at least 2 years. These data suggest a persistent immune response after two doses of ChAdOx1 nCov-19 which will likely have a positive impact against serious disease and hospitalization.

Tuberculosis (TB) is a major global health problem and the only currently-licensed vaccine, BCG, is inadequate. Many TB vaccine candidates are designed to be given as a boost to BCG; an understanding of the BCG-induced immune response is therefore critical, and the opportunity to relate this to circumstances where BCG does confer protection may direct the design of more efficacious vaccines. While the T cell response to BCG vaccination has been well-characterized, there is a paucity of literature on the humoral response. We demonstrate BCG vaccine-mediated induction of specific antibodies in different human populations and macaque species which represent important preclinical models for TB vaccine development. We observe a strong correlation between antibody titers in serum versus plasma with modestly higher titers in serum. We also report for the first time the rapid and transient induction of antibody-secreting plasmablasts following BCG vaccination, together with a robust and durable memory B cell response in humans. Finally, we demonstrate a functional role for BCG vaccine-induced specific antibodies in opsonizing mycobacteria and enhancing macrophage phagocytosis in vitro , which may contribute to the BCG vaccine-mediated control of mycobacterial growth observed. Taken together, our findings indicate that the humoral immune response in the context of BCG vaccination merits further attention to determine whether TB vaccine candidates could benefit from the induction of humoral as well as cellular immunity.

Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG), the only currently licenced tuberculosis vaccine, may exert beneficial non-specific effects (NSE) in reducing infant mortality. We conducted a randomised controlled clinical study in healthy UK adults to evaluate potential NSE using functional in-vitro growth inhibition assays (GIAs) as a surrogate of protection from four bacteria implicated in infant mortality. Volunteers were randomised to receive BCG intradermally (n = 27) or to be unvaccinated (n = 8) and were followed up for 84 days; laboratory staff were blinded until completion of the final visit. Using GIAs based on peripheral blood mononuclear cells, we observed a significant reduction in the growth of the Gram-negative bacteria Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumonia following BCG vaccination, but no effect for the Gram-positive bacteria Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus agalactiae. There was a modest association between S. aureus nasal carriage and growth of S. aureus in the GIA. Our findings support a causal link between BCG vaccination and improved ability to control growth of heterologous bacteria. Unbiased assays such as GIAs are potentially useful tools for the assessment of non-specific as well as specific effects of TB vaccines. This study was funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02380508, 05/03/2015; completed).

Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever (CCHF) is a priority emerging disease. CCHF, caused by the CCHF virus (CCHFV), can lead to hemorrhagic fever in humans with severe cases often having fatal outcomes. CCHFV is maintained within a tick-vertebrate-tick cycle, which includes domestic animals. Domestic animals infected with CCHFV do not show clinical signs of the disease and the presence of antibodies in the serum can provide evidence of their exposure to the virus. Current serological tests are specific to either one CCHFV antigen or the whole virus antigen. Here, we present the development of two in-house ELISAs for the detection of serum IgG that is specific for two different CCHFV antigens: glycoprotein Gc (CCHFV Gc) and nucleoprotein (CCHFV NP). We demonstrate that these two assays were able to detect anti-CCHFV Gc-specific and anti-CCHFV NP-specific IgG in sheep from endemic CCHFV areas with high specificity, providing new insight into the heterogeneity of the immune response induced by natural infection with CCHFV in domestic animals.

Serological assays for detection of IgG, IgM or IgA against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) play an important role in surveillance, antibody persistence, vaccine coverage and infection rate. Serological assays, including both ELISA and rapid lateral flow assays, are available commercially but the cost limits their accessibility for low resource countries. Although serological assays based on mammalian-expressed SARS-CoV-2 spike protein have been previously described these assays need to be validated using samples from local populations within the continent, or country, in which they will be used. Interpretation of results could be influenced by differences in specificity and potential for pre-existing cross-reactive antibodies. In this study, we investigated two laboratory developed serological assays, an enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and an immunofluorescent assay (IFA), developed using recombinant SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, for use in South African populations. The tests were compared with commercially available and South Africa Health Products Regulatory Authority (SAPHRA) approved assays. A panel of 100 residual diagnostic serum samples, collected prior to the pandemic, were tested on three separate occasions to determine a suitable cut-off value for differ-entiation of positive from negative samples. Specificity of 96 % and 100 % for ELISA and IFA respectively was demonstrated. A total of 82/89 serum samples collected between days 2-94 after onset of illness from patients with a positive molecular result were positive for IgG antibody. The sensitivity of the laboratory developed assays on samples collected > one week after onset of illness was shown to be 100 % and 98.8 % for ELISA and IFA respectively. Positive predictive values were 92.1 % for ELISA and 91.0 % for IFA using characterization of samples as positive based on confirmation of infection using RT-PCR. Serum samples (n = 62) collected from RT-PCR positive patients infected with either ancestral, or emerging variants such as Beta or Delta, tested positive for IgG antibody (62/62) using the laboratory developed assays confirming application of the assays regardless of currently circulating variant during the time of evaluation. High concordance was demonstrated between the laboratory developed assays and the commercial immunoassay among samples collected from South African populations, although the small sample size, especially for the comparison with commercial assays, must be noted. If all quality assurance controls are in place, the use of local laboratory developed assays for high -throughput screening in resource-constrained environments is a realistic alternative option.