OBJECTIVE:To determine if prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy (pNPWT) allows for the prevention of surgical site infections (SSIs) in abdominal surgery.METHOD:A non-systematic review assessing the evidence was conducted in 2020.RESULTS:Retrospectve studies comparing patients with pNPWT with patients receiving standard wound dressing after abdominal surgery showed encouragning results in favour of pNPWT for reducing the incidence of SSIs, but randomised controlled trials have so far reported mixed results.CONCLUSION:New randomised controlled trials including a sufficient number of patients at risk of SSIs are needed for confirming the results of non-interventional studies.

Abstract Background and aim Upper gastrointestinal cancers (UGC) are a leading cause of cancer related deaths. Brain metastases (BM) from gastric and esophageal cancer are rare and associated with a poor survival time. In order to establish the most accurate incidence and characteristics of BM in UGC, we decide to review all studies and series published in the last years. Methods We searched the keywords ‘Gastric cancer OR Oesophageal Cancer + Cerebral Metastasis’ in Pubmed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library. Inclusion criteria were all studies treating with BM from UGC cancer. When inclusion criteria were met, we extracted the following endpoints for each study: author, year of publication, country of population, tumor localization, tumor histology, number of BM, synchronous or metachronous BM, other localization of metastases, surgical treatment of the primary tumor, different modality of BM treatment (surgery, steatosic radiosurgery, whole brain radiation, gamma knife surgery), survival and follow-up. Results In the final analysis, we included 52 studies. The number of patients with oesophageal tumor were described in 30 studies with 41636 patients from which 1234 patients (2.9%) had BM. 526 patients (63%) had an adenocarcinoma, 287 (34%) had a SCC and 17 (3%) other histology. BM was unique in 288 patients (50%) and multiples in 282 patients (50%). Combined radiotherapy and surgery was performed in 129 patients (17.9%). Surgical metastasectomy was performed in 172 patients (24.25%). Stereotaxic radiotherapy was delivered in 60 patients (8.5%). Whole brain radiotherapy was performed in 265 patients (35.9%), gamma knife surgery in 43 patients (5.9%), chemotherapy in 10 patients (1.6%) and no treatment in 43 patients (5.9%). Median survival was reported from 3 to 24 months. We identified 12 articles which matched criteria for gastric cancer with a total of 73.781 primary gastric tumors where 645 presented BM (0.87%). We could identify 159 patients with single BM (42.3%) compared to 217 patients with multiple BM (57.7%). We identified 434 adenocarcinoma which represent 81.1% of BM. Median survival was from 1.3 to 27 months with a median survival of 4.2 months. Conclusion BM from UGC are rare but with a low survival. Multimodal treatment is the most described treatment strategy.

Background Achieving proficiency in a surgical procedure is a milestone in the career of a trainee. We introduced a competency assessment tool for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in our residency program. Our aim was to assess the inter-rater reliability of this tool. Methods We included all laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed by residents under the supervision of board certified surgeons. All residents were assessed at the end of the procedure by the supervising surgeon (live reviewer) using our competency assessment tool. Video records of the same procedure were analyzed by two independent reviewers (reviewer A and B), who were blinded to the performing trainee’s. The assessment had three parts: a laparoscopic cholecystectomy-specific assessment tool (LCAT), the objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS) and a 5-item visual analogue scale (VAS) to address the surgeon’s autonomy in each part of the cholecystectomy. We compared the assessment scores of the live supervising surgeon and the video reviewers. Results We included 15 junior residents who performed 42 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Scoring results from live and video reviewer were comparable except for the OSATS and VAS part. The score for OSATS by the live reviewer and reviewer B were 3.68 vs. 4.26 respectively ( p = 0.04) and for VAS (5.17 vs. 4.63 respectively ( p = 0.03). The same difference was found between reviewers A and B with OSATS score (3.75 vs. 4.26 respectively ( p = 0.001)) and VAS (5.56 vs. 4.63 respectively; p = 0.004)). Conclusion Our competency assessment tool for the evaluation of surgical skills specific to laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been shown to be objective and comparable in-between raters during live procedure or on video material.

PURPOSE:We evaluated evidence related to the use of a rod (bridge) to prevent stoma retraction during loop ostomy construction. METHODS:We completed a systematic review of the literature. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and COCHRANE databases up to December 4, 2019. We posed the following question based on a PICO format. Do adult patients undergoing ostomy surgery experience less stomal retraction when compared to patients managed without placement of a stoma rod? FINDINGS:Our initial search returned 182 articles; after reading studies in full, 5 articles were identified that collectively enrolled 1058 participants. Four studies were randomized controlled trials and one was a prospective cohort study. Meta-analysis could not be performed because of the small number of studies and the heterogeneity of outcomes measurements. The incidence of stoma retraction ranged between 0%-8% in patients managed with a rod and 0.78%-8.2% in patients with no rod. The number of reported adverse events was low. Placement of a stoma rod was associated with more adverse outcomes than in patients managed without a rod. Adverse events included local edema, stoma necrosis, skin necrosis, peristomal moisture-associated skin damage (irritant dermatitis), peristomal abscess, bleeding, and mucocutaneous separation. CONCLUSIONS:Stoma rod does not seem to reduce the risk of stoma retraction and might result in other adverse events. IMPLICATIONS:We recommend avoidance of stoma rod/bridge placement during ostomy surgery.

Puborectalis muscle rupture usually arises from peri-partum perineal trauma and may result in anterior, middle compartment prolapses, posterior compartment prolapse which includes rectocele and rectal prolapse, with or without associated anal sphincter damage. Patients with puborectalis muscle and levator ani rupture may present some form of incontinence or evacuation disorder, sexual dysfunction or pelvic organ descent. However, the literature on this subject is scarce. The aim of our study was to evaluate management and treatment of functional disorders associated with puborectalis and/or pubococcygei rupture at the level of the insertion in the pubis in a cohort of patients referred to a tertiary care coloproctology center. We conducted a prospective cohort study of patients with levator ani and puborectalis muscle avulsion in the Proctology and Pelvic Floor Unit, Division of Digestive Surgery of the University Hospitals of Geneva from January 2001 to November 2018. Clinical examination, anoscopy and ultrasound were performed on a routine basis. Rupture of the levator ani muscle was diagnosed by clinical examination and ultrasound. A Wexner incontinence score was completed before and 6 months after surgery. Levator ani muscle repair was performed using a transvaginal approach. Fifty-two female patients (median age 56 ± 11.69 SD years, range 38–86 years) were included in the study. Thirty-one patients (59.6%) had anal incontinence, 25 (48.1%) urinary incontinence, 28 (53.9%) dyschezia (obstructive defecation or excessive straining to defecate), 20 (38.5%) dyspareunia, 17 (32.7%) colpophony, and 13 (25.0%) impaired sensation during sexual intercourse. Deviation of the anus on the side opposite the lesion was observed in 50 patients (96.2%), confirmed with clinical examination and both endoanal and perineal ultrasound. Out of these 52 patients, levator ani rupture (including puborectalis rupture) were categorized into right sided, 43 (82.69%), left sided, 7 (13.46%) and bilateral, 2 (3.85%). Levator ani muscle repair was performed in all patients, associated with posterior repair and levatorplasty in 26 patients (50%) and with sphincteroplasty in 34 patients (63.4%). Four patients (7.7%) experienced postoperative complications: significant postoperative pain (n = 3; 5.77%), urinary retention (n = 2; 3.85%), hematoma (n = 1; 1.92%), and perineal abscess (n = 1; 1.92%). Forty-one patients (78.8%) had full restoration of normal puborectalis muscle function (Wexner score: 0/20) after surgery, and overall, all patients had an improvement in the Wexner score and in sexual function. Dyschezia was reported by 28 patients (53.9%) preoperatively, resolved in 18 (64.3%) and improved by 50% or more in 10 (35.71%). Diagnosis of levator ani and puborectalis muscle rupture requires careful history taking, clinical examination, endoanal and perineal ultrasound. Surgical repair improved anal continence as well as sexual function in all patients. Transvaginal levator ani repair seems to be well tolerated with good short-term results.

INTRODUCTION:Gastric volvulus are rare. Complications can be life threatening, including necrosis and perforation. Assessment of mucosal viability is essential, and urgent surgical intervention is mandatory in case of vascular compromise. PRESENTATION OF CASE:An 72-year-old female known for a paraesophageal hiatal hernia was admitted at our emergency department with acute abdominal pain. Blood count demonstrated leukocytosis and increased C-reactive protein. Abdominal computed tomography showed a mesenteroaxial gastric volvulus. Urgent upper endoscopy revealed mucosal ischemia, which prompted immediate laparotomy with partial gastrectomy, cruroplasty, and Dor fundoplication. Postoperative course was uneventful. DISCUSSION:Gastric volvulus is initially treated with nasogastric tube decompression, but definitive treatment is achieved surgically. When there is an associated hernia, closing the anatomical defect and fundoplication should be performed. Complication such as necrosis is associated with a high mortality, and requires urgent surgical repair. CONCLUSION:Gastric volvulus can be life-threatening. Urgent endoscopic or surgical assessment should be conducted to assess mucosal viability.

Introduction Application of a prophylactic mesh during stoma closure was shown to reduce the incidence of incisional hernia at the site of stoma closure. Our objective is to provide high quality evidence to validate this finding. Methods and analysis The study will be a randomised controlled triple-blinded superiority parallel monocentric trial. Patients undergoing elective ileostomy or colostomy closure after surgery for digestive cancer will be eligible for inclusion. Patients allergic to the mesh, immunosuppressed or refusing to participate will be excluded. Randomisation will be performed based on a 1:1 allocation ratio between stoma closure with application of a non-absorbable mesh in the sublay position (intervention) and stoma closure without a mesh (control). The primary outcome will be the 1-year incidence of incisional hernia at the site of stoma closure, determined clinically and by CT. Secondary outcomes will be the 31-day incidence of surgical site infection and the modified Carolinas Comfort Scale. Patients, radiologists and investigators performing the assessment at 1 year will be blinded for the allocated study group. Analysis will be performed in intention-to-treat. The trial will include 68 patients (34 with mesh, 34 without mesh). Ethics and dissemination The present randomised controlled trial was registered into clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 04510558) and was accepted by the local ethic committee (Geneva, Switzerland: CCER 2021-00053). The results will be presented at national and international congresses in the fields of colorectal surgery and general surgery, and published in a peer-reviewed journal.

Background: Despite new medical and surgical strategies, 5-year local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma was reported in up to 25% of cases. Therefore, we aimed to review surgical strategies for the prevention of local recurrences in rectal cancer. Summary: After implementation of the total mesorectal excision (TME), surgical resection of rectal adenocarcinoma with anterior resection or abdominoperineal excision (APE) allowed decrease in local recurrence (3% at 5 years). More recently, extralevator APE was described as an alternative to APE, decreasing specimen perforation and recurrence rate. Moreover, technique modifications were developed to optimize rectal resection, such as the laparoscopic or robotic approach, and transanal TME. However, the technical advantages conferred by these techniques did not translate into a decreased recurrence rate. Lateral lymph node dissection is another technique, which aimed at improving the long-term outcomes; nevertheless, there is currently no evidence to recommend its routine use. Strategies to preserve the rectum are also emerging, such as local excision, and may be beneficial for subgroups of patients. Key Messages: Rectal cancer management requires a multidisciplinary approach, and surgical strategy should be tailored to patient factors: general health, previous perineal intervention, anatomy, preference, and tumor characteristics such as stage and localization.

It is currently unknown whether NASH (nonalcoholic steatohepatitis), as compared to simple steatosis, is associated with impaired postoperative weight loss and metabolic outcomes after RYGB surgery. To compare the effectiveness of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) on patients with NASH versus those with simple nonalcoholic fatty liver (NAFL). We retrospectively retrieved data from 515 patients undergoing RYGB surgery with concomitant liver biopsy. Clinical follow-up and metabolic assessment were performed prior to surgery and 12 months after surgery. We used multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) and propensity score matching and we assessed for changes in markers of hepatocellular injury and metabolic outcomes. There were 421 patients with simple NAFL, and 94 with NASH. Baseline alanine and aspartate aminotransferases were significantly higher in patients with NASH (p < 0.01). Twelve months after the RYGB surgery, as determined by both MANOVA and propensity score matching, patients with NASH exhibited a significantly greater reduction in alanine aminotransferase (ß-coefficient − 12 iU/l [− 22 to − 1.83], 95% CI, adjusted p = 0.021) compared to their NAFL counterparts (31 matched patients in each group with no loss to follow-up at 12 months). Excess weight loss was similar in both groups (ß-coefficient 4.54% [− 3.12 to 12.21], 95% CI, adjusted p = 0.244). Change in BMI was comparable in both groups (− 14 (− 16.6 to − 12.5) versus − 14.3 (− 17.3 to − 11.9), p = 0.784). After RYGB surgery, patients with NASH experience a greater reduction in markers for hepatocellular injury and similar weight loss compared to patients with simple steatosis.

PURPOSE We evaluated evidence related to the use of a rod (bridge) to prevent stoma retraction during loop ostomy construction. METHODS: We completed a systematic review of the literature. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and COCHRANE databases up to December 4, 2019. We posed the following question based on a PICO format. Do adult patients undergoing ostomy surgery experience less stomal retraction when compared to patients managed without placement of a stoma rod? FINDINGS: Our initial search returned 182 articles; after reading studies in full, 5 articles were identified that collectively enrolled 1058 participants. Four studies were randomized controlled trials and one was a prospective cohort study. Meta-analysis could not be performed because of the small number of studies and the heterogeneity of outcomes measurements. The incidence of stoma retraction ranged between 0%-8% in patients managed with a rod and 0.78%-8.2% in patients with no rod. The number of reported adverse events was low. Placement of a stoma rod was associated with more adverse outcomes than in patients managed without a rod. Adverse events included local edema, stoma necrosis, skin necrosis, peristomal moisture-associated skin damage (irritant dermatitis), peristomal abscess, bleeding, and mucocutaneous separation. CONCLUSIONS: Stoma rod does not seem to reduce the risk of stoma retraction and might result in other adverse events. IMPLICATIONS: We recommend avoidance of stoma rod/bridge placement during ostomy surgery.

BACKGROUND The incidence of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) has increased in recent years. They can affect every area of the human body that presents cells with a secretory function. In this report, we focus on gastrointestinal NETs. The small bowel (SI) is the most affected area and SI-NETs have recently become more common than adenocarcinomas. Inside the small intestine, the appendix suffers from this pathology more than other organs. CASE REPORT Our case report deals with a 70 years-old man with extensive abdominal pain due to ingestion of an apricot kernel. A CT abdominal scan showed, around the kernel, a mechanical ileus with inflammation of the distal ileum and thickening of the intestinal wall. During the operation, we replaced laparoscopy with mini-laparotomy, performing an ileocecectomy due to suspicion of a tumor lesion. The histopathological exam revealed a well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor (NET G1) of the distal ileum. CONCLUSIONS This case report shows that SI-NETs can be found in cases of small bowel occlusion. Depending on the size and distinction, such patients can have good survival rates.

Training surgeons who are skilled and competent will improve patient outcomes. Since surgical know-how is developed by performing surgical procedures, surgeons must have their skills, expertise, and performance consistently evaluated. 1 Mathis R. Watanabe Y. Ghaderi I. et al. What are the skills that represent expert-level laparoscopic suturing? A Delphi Study. Surg Endosc. 2020; 34: 1318-1323 Crossref PubMed Scopus (2) Google Scholar

Objective: Rare disease Background: Intussusception in adults (AI) accounts for 1% of all cases of bowel obstruction. While pediatric intussusception is well known and almost always idiopathic, an underlying cause is usually found in adults. Indication for surgical treatment and intussusception reduction before resection remain controversial in AI. Here, we present an uncommon case of an immunocompromised patient who had multiple intussusceptions. Case Report: A 59-year-old woman, who had received a kidney-pancreas transplant for type 1 diabetes with end-stage renal failure, was admitted to our Intensive Care Unit for septic shock of suspected pulmonary origin. A thoraco-abdominal CT scan demonstrated signs of bilateral pneumonia and multiple abdominal intussusceptions, for which she underwent surgery. Four intestinal intussusceptions were found. Manual desinvagination was performed without bowel resection. After surgery, the patient presented a new bowel obstruction, requiring a second surgery, showing recurrence of 1 intussusception. Segmental resection was indicated, but not performed because of the septic shock, requiring high-dose noradrenalin. The patient progressed toward multi-organ failure, leading to her death a few days later. An autopsy revealed that multiple adenomas were responsible for the intussusceptions. Conclusions: This case confirms that AI is rarely a spontaneous disease and that the therapeutic strategy should be planned accordingly. There is currently no systematic approach for AI, and guidelines are needed to improve its management.

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this article. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.

Objective: Based on the Competency Assessment Tool, herein we developed an assessment instrument suitable to evaluate the implantation of central intravenous devices. Background: Surgical assessment is based mainly on the subjective impressions of the teacher. Based on the "Competency Assessment Tool" (CAT) developed for the evaluation of technical surgical skills in minimally invasive colorectal resection, we designed an assessment tool suitable to evaluate the implantation of central venous access devices performed by junior surgical trainees. Methods: Four major assessments during the different steps of the intervention were used in this evaluation. Each of these tasks was divided into four sub-domains according to surgical skill. In addition to the CAT score, the apprentices' skills were evaluated using a visual assessment that was quantified using an analogue scale (value from 1 to 10). The candidates were classified into junior and senior trainees depending on the number of procedures they had already performed and on their surgical experience. Results: 71 procedures were evaluated during the study period. Seven senior trainees conducted 43 procedures and five junior trainees performed 28 interventions. The senior trainees had significantly higher CAT scores than junior candidates, and the scores fluctuated according to surgical experience, usually reaching their peak after 10 procedures. Conclusions: The CAT model is well suited for the assessment of surgical trainees during central venous access device implantation. It enables a close assessment of the learning process and the technical skills of trainees, which helps them improving in a safe, standardized manner. (C) 2020 Les Auteurs. Publie par Elsevier Masson SAS.

Sur la base de l’outil d’évaluation des compétences chirurgicales, nous avons développé un instrument d’évaluation approprié pour évaluer l’implantation de dispositifs intraveineux centraux. L’évaluation chirurgicale est basée principalement sur les impressions subjectives du teacher. Sur la base de l’« outil d’évaluation des compétences » (OEC) développé pour l’évaluation des compétences pratiques en chirurgie colorectale minimalement-invasive, nous avons conçu un outil d’évaluation adapté pour évaluer l’implantation de dispositifs d’accès veineux centraux réalisée par des candidats en chirurgie. L’évaluation est divisée en quatre différentes étapes de l’intervention. Chacune de ces tâches a été divisée en quatre sous-domaines objectivant les compétences chirurgicales. En plus du score OEC, les compétences des apprentis ont été évaluées à l’aide d’une évaluation visuelle qui a été quantifiée à par l’intermédiaire d’une échelle analogique (valeur de 1 à 10). Les candidats ont été classés en internes juniors et seniors en fonction du nombre d’interventions qu’ils avaient déjà effectuées et de leur expérience chirurgicale. Soixante et onze procédures ont été évaluées au cours de la période d’étude. Sept candidats seniors ont effectué 43 procédures et cinq juniors ont effectué 28 interventions. Les internes seniors ont obtenu des scores OEC significativement plus élevés que les candidats juniors, et les scores fluctuaient en fonction de l’expérience chirurgicale, atteignant généralement leur apogée après 10 interventions. Le modèle OEC est bien adapté à l’évaluation des candidats en chirurgie lors de l’implantation d’un dispositif d’accès veineux central. Il permet une évaluation approfondie du processus d’apprentissage et des compétences techniques, ce qui les médecins en cours de spécialisation chirurgicale à s’améliorer de manière sûre et standardisée. Based on the Competency Assessment Tool, herein we developed an assessment instrument suitable to evaluate the implantation of central intravenous devices. Surgical assessment is based mainly on the subjective impressions of the teacher. Based on the “Competency Assessment Tool” (CAT) developed for the evaluation of technical surgical skills in minimally invasive colorectal resection, we designed an assessment tool suitable to evaluate the implantation of central venous access devices performed by junior surgical trainees. Four major assessments during the different steps of the intervention were used in this evaluation. Each of these tasks was divided into four sub-domains according to surgical skill. In addition to the CAT score, the apprentices’ skills were evaluated using a visual assessment that was quantified using an analogue scale (value from 1 to 10). The candidates were classified into junior and senior trainees depending on the number of procedures they had already performed and on their surgical experience. 71 procedures were evaluated during the study period. Seven senior trainees conducted 43 procedures and five junior trainees performed 28 interventions. The senior trainees had significantly higher CAT scores than junior candidates, and the scores fluctuated according to surgical experience, usually reaching their peak after 10 procedures. The CAT model is well suited for the assessment of surgical trainees during central venous access device implantation. It enables a close assessment of the learning process and the technical skills of trainees, which helps them improving in a safe, standardized manner.

BACKGROUND Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS) is a heterogeneous group of rare inherited diseases involving connective tissue. Vascular EDS (vEDS) is associated with abnormal type III collagen, which is an essential component of skin, hollow organs and arterial walls, and causes potentially fatal visceral and arterial complications. The surgical management of these patients is challenging and should be limited to life-saving procedures. CASE DESCRIPTION We report a case of a 42-year-old male who presented a hemorrhagic shock due to spontaneous rupture of an ascending branch of the left colic artery. The coexisting presence of multiple abdominal vascular abnormalities suggested the diagnosis of vEDS, later confirmed by the discovery of a new missense mutation in the COL3A1 gene with pathogenic significance. The post-operative course was marked by a mechanical ileus caused by an ischemic stenosis of the descending colon. Failure of conservative management and the well-known risk of colonic perforation in these patients led to the decision to perform a diverting ileostomy. CONCLUSION The management of these patients is difficult, and risk-benefit assessments must be made on a case-by-case basis. Less invasive procedures should be considered whenever possible.

Objectives Preoperative consultation is usually not performed before insertion of a totally implantable venous access device (TIVAD). In our experience, an incomplete preoperative assessment, a predictable medical condition contraindicating surgery, or no-show patients the day of surgery led to several surgery cancellations. Therefore, we introduced a specific preoperative surgical consultation for TIVAD that took place shortly before surgery. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the patients’ satisfaction and to establish the rate of cancellation after the adoption of this strategy. Methods Two-hundred and four patients who benefited from the preoperative consultation before TIVAD insertion from August 2014 to August 2016 were included. Satisfaction of patients and cancellation rate were documented. Results With that strategy, no TIVAD insertion was either delayed or cancelled. The overall level of satisfaction was high (91.8%); 184 patients (90.2%) judged the consultation useful in preparation for the surgery. The surgical procedure met their expectations in 92.2% of cases. Patients known for a psychiatric comorbidity were more likely to express dissatisfaction. Conclusions The introduction of a specific preoperative surgical consultation for TIVAD insertion led to a high level of patients’ satisfaction. After the preoperative consultation, no cancellation was recorded. Special approaches have to be considered for patients with a psychiatric comorbidity.

Background: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors are the most frequent mesenchymal tumors and represent 1- 3% of all digestive neoplasms. Their incidence is 0.68 per 10,000 people. GISTs originate from the interstitial cells of Cajal, which are known as the gastrointestinal pacemaker, and carry mutations in the KIT gene in 95% of those affected. GISTs occur mainly in the middle-aged and rarely under the age of 40. The main age of presentation is 64 years old. The most common site of metastasis is the liver (65%), and exceptionally the bone (3%). Discussion: Rectal GISTs represent 5 to 15% of all GISTs. They are usually asymptomatic and discovered incidentally. Surgical resection with curative intent is the standard treatment for localized GISTs. Complete excision of the tumor is the most significant factor related to the outcome and can be accomplished in 40- 60% of cases. For borderline or unresectable lesions, neoadjuvant treatment with anti-tyrosine kinase (imatinib) should be considered. Imatinib is considered to be a relatively safe treatment and is generally well-tolerated by patients. Overall, the five-year survival rate is 90% for low-grade GIST, but the prognosis is worse for high-grade tumors (< 20%). Bone metastasis is a rare site of GIST metastases and usually presents itself during disease relapse. We present a rare case of a patient with an oligometastatic with pelvic bone lesion rectal GIST who developed parapharyngeal metastasis infiltrating C3 with airway compromise. Unfortunately, the patient passed away after massive tracheal bleeding. Conclusion: Bone metastasis from GIST is uncommon. The development of dyspnea and hoarseness should prompt the diagnosis of potential life-threatening complications such as parapharyngeal metastasis.

Fifteen percent of patients undergoing elective sigmoidectomy will present a diverticulitis recurrence, which is associated with significant costs and morbidity. We aimed to systematically review the risk factors associated with recurrence after elective sigmoidectomy. PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science were searched for studies published until May 1, 2020. Original studies were included if (i) they included patients undergoing sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease, (ii) they reported postoperative recurrent diverticulitis, and (iii) they analyzed ≥ 1 variable associated with recurrence. The primary outcome was the risk factors for recurrence of diverticulitis after sigmoidectomy. From the 1463 studies initially screened, six studies were included. From the 1062 patients included, 62 patients recurred (5.8%), and six variables were associated with recurrence. Two were preoperative: age (HR = 0.96, p = 0.02) and irritable bowel syndrome (33.3% with recurrence versus 12.1% without recurrence, p = 0.02). Two were operative factors: uncomplicated recurrent diverticulitis as indication for surgery (73.3% with recurrence versus 49.9% without recurrence, p = 0.049) and anastomotic level (colorectal: HR = 11.4, p = 0.02, or colosigmoid: OR = 4, p = 0.033). Two were postoperative variables: the absence of active diverticulitis on pathology (39.6% with recurrence versus 26.6% without recurrence) and persistence of postoperative pain (HR = 4.8, p < 0.01). Identification of preoperative variables that predict the occurrence of diverticulitis recurrence should help surgical decision-making for elective sigmoidectomy, while peri- and postoperative factors should be taken into account for optimal patient follow-up.