IntroductionThe influence of medical dramas could extend beyond the realm of entertainment and potentially strengthen/orient the knowledge, attitudes and hopefully practice of health professionals and the public, despite often depicting unrealistic medical outcomes and scenarios.MethodsThis study examined the portrayal of public health issues in two popular international medical series, “Grey’s Anatomy” and “House, MD,” selected for their awards and viewership ratings. Individual episodes were double-rated by clinicians for patient characteristics, public health issues, and infection risk management.Results94 episodes with 286 clinical cases were analyzed. A wide range of conditions and pathologies were depicted, with a focus on acute clinical events, trauma and mental disorders, which contrasts with real-life causes of hospitalization and highlight the dramatization in these series. Public health issues such as organ donation and substance abuse were frequently addressed, but prevention and health promotion received little attention. Proper use of personal protective equipment was mostly observed, although hand hygiene was underrepresented.ConclusionThe study highlights the dual role of medical dramas as an entertainment medium and a potential educational tool. While they can raise awareness and encourage healthier behavior, their portrayal of medical practices and patient care often deviates from reality and can create unrealistic expectations. The influence of these dramas also extends to viewers’ perceptions of healthcare and medical professionals, underscoring the need for accurate and responsible portrayal of health issues in the media.

Diet is considered one of the most important determinants of health and at the same time a cause of climate change. We conducted a cross-sectional study in three Italian hospital canteens on five consecutive working days to investigate food offer availability and user choices in terms of nutritional intake and environmental impact. Photos of lunch trays were collected by the researchers and food offer and choices were analysed using the Italian Food Composition Database for Epidemiological Studies and the SU-EATABLE LIFE dataset. A total of 1227 lunch meals were analysed. The median energy intake ranged from 646 to 900 kcal/tray. The median energy content from lipids ranged from 32 to 40 % of energy and exceeded that from carbohydrates in one canteen. The median carbon and water footprint ranged from 773 to 1338 g CO2 eq./tray and from 847 to 1229 L H2O/tray, respectively. Differences occurred depending on sex and typology of work. In conclusion, regardless of the differences in the number of food options offered in the three canteens, the choices tended to be suboptimal from a nutritional perspective. The most sustainable choices were made in the canteen without beef on offer. Measures should be taken to increase the variety of vegan and vegetarian options on offer and to improve food choices in terms of nutritional composition and environmental sustainability. This could be done through educational programmes focused on increasing awareness on their diet, and practical indications on how to compose a complete and low impact meal.

Population Medicine considers the following types of articles:• Research Papers -reports of data from original research or secondary dataset analyses.• Review Papers -comprehensive, authoritative, reviews within the journal's scope.These include both systematic reviews and narrative reviews.• Short Reports -brief reports of data from original research.• Policy Case Studies -brief articles on policy development at a regional or national level.• Study Protocols -articles describing a research protocol of a study.• Methodology Papers -papers that present different methodological approaches that can be used to investigate problems in a relevant scientific field and to encourage innovation.• Methodology Papers -papers that present different methodological approaches that can be used to investigate problems in a relevant scientific field and to encourage innovation.

Population Medicine considers the following types of articles:• Research Papers -reports of data from original research or secondary dataset analyses.• Review Papers -comprehensive, authoritative, reviews within the journal's scope.These include both systematic reviews and narrative reviews.• Short Reports -brief reports of data from original research.• Policy Case Studies -brief articles on policy development at a regional or national level.• Study Protocols -articles describing a research protocol of a study.• Methodology Papers -papers that present different methodological approaches that can be used to investigate problems in a relevant scientific field and to encourage innovation.• Methodology Papers -papers that present different methodological approaches that can be used to investigate problems in a relevant scientific field and to encourage innovation.

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the presence of anti-hepatitis B (HBV) c antibodies (HBcAb positivity) could influence the control of HIV viremia in patients living with HIV (PLWH) who switch to two-drug antiretroviral therapy (2DR) containing lamivudine (3TC) (2DR-3TC-based). A retrospective multicentre observational study was conducted on 160 PLWH switching to the 2DR-3TC-based regimen: 51 HBcAb-positive and 109 HBcAb-negative patients. The HBcAb-positive PLWH group demonstrated a significantly lower percentage of subjects with HIV viral suppression with target not detected (TND) at all time points after switching (24th month: 64.7% vs. 87.8%, p < 0.0001; 36th month 62.7% vs. 86.8%, p = 0.011; 48th month 57.2% vs. 86.1%, p = 0.021 of the HBcAb-positive and HBcAb-negative groups, respectively). Logistic regression analysis showed that the presence of HBcAb positivity (OR 7.46 [95% CI 2.35–14.77], p = 0.004) could favour the emergence of HIV viral rebound by nearly 54% during the entire study follow-up after switching to 2DR-3TC.

Population Medicine considers the following types of articles:• Research Papers -reports of data from original research or secondary dataset analyses.• Review Papers -comprehensive, authoritative, reviews within the journal's scope.These include both systematic reviews and narrative reviews.• Short Reports -brief reports of data from original research.• Policy Case Studies -brief articles on policy development at a regional or national level.• Study Protocols -articles describing a research protocol of a study.• Methodology Papers -papers that present different methodological approaches that can be used to investigate problems in a relevant scientific field and to encourage innovation.• Methodology Papers -papers that present different methodological approaches that can be used to investigate problems in a relevant scientific field and to encourage innovation.

Population Medicine considers the following types of articles:• Research Papers -reports of data from original research or secondary dataset analyses.• Review Papers -comprehensive, authoritative, reviews within the journal's scope.These include both systematic reviews and narrative reviews.• Short Reports -brief reports of data from original research.• Policy Case Studies -brief articles on policy development at a regional or national level.• Study Protocols -articles describing a research protocol of a study.• Methodology Papers -papers that present different methodological approaches that can be used to investigate problems in a relevant scientific field and to encourage innovation.• Methodology Papers -papers that present different methodological approaches that can be used to investigate problems in a relevant scientific field and to encourage innovation.

We report the time course of neutralizing antibody (NtAb) response, as measured by authentic virus neutralization, in healthcare workers (HCWs) with a mild or asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) infection diagnosed at the onset of the pandemic, with no reinfection throughout and after a three-dose schedule of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine with an overall follow-up of almost two years since infection. Forty-eight HCWs (median age 47 years, all immunocompetent) were evaluated: 29 (60.4%) were asymptomatic. NtAb serum was titrated at eight subsequent time points: T1 and T2 were after natural infection, T3 on the day of the first vaccine dose, T4 on the day of the second dose, T5, T6, and T7 were between the second and third dose, and T8 followed the third dose by a median of 34 days. NtAb titers at all postvaccination time points (T4 to T8) were significantly higher than all those at prevaccination time points (T1 to T3). The highest NtAb increase was following the first vaccine dose while subsequent doses did not further boost NtAb titers. However, the third vaccine dose appeared to revive waning immunity. NtAb levels were positively correlated at most time points suggesting an important role for immunogenetics.

Aims: The aims of this study were to report a description of the HCV genotype distribution in adult Italians and non-Italians subjects tested in the Microbiology and Virology Unit of the Padova University Hospital from January 2016 (after about one year from the availability of DAAs) to December 2018 and to compare genotype frequencies in the 12-month period before and after the application of the wider access criteria to HCV treatment. Background: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a major health problem, but the availability of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) has dramatically changed HCV disease natural history because these drugs have excellent tolerability and they can eliminate the virus in almost all treated patients. Objective: The objective was to describe the circulating HCV genotypes in high-income countries in order to help health authorities in the future organization of DAAs treatment strategies; this aspect is not limited to drug prescription, but it also includes the identification of infected individuals who are undiagnosed, which is the limiting step to achieve the HCV elimination goal. Methods: Adult patients who had HCV genotype performed from 01/01/16 to 31/12/18 in the Microbiology and Virology Unit of the Padova University Hospital were included in the study: the two 12-month periods were April 2016-March 2017 (before period, BEF) and April 2017-March 2018 (after period, AFT). Results: Italians were 2168 (91.2%) and non-Italians were 208 (8.8%). Italians median age was 55 years, and females were older. Italians had a lower genotype 1 (p=0.0012) and higher genotype 2 frequencies (p<0.0001) with respect to non-Italians. Most patients aged 38-67 years: Italians were more represented in class age 48-57 years (p=0.0138), 68-77 years (p=0.001) and ≥78 years (p<0.0001); subjects with genotype 3 were the youngest and those with genotype 2 the oldest. Italian patients typed in the AFT and BEF were comparable; only a lower frequency of genotype 1 males and younger age in genotype 3 were found in AFT. Conclusion: Italians were older with respect to non-Italians, which implies that a different age based screening program could be applied. Italian genotype 3 subjects represent a cohort to focus on for the risk of therapeutic failure. Patients tested after the extended criteria for HCV treatment were very similar to those tested before, suggesting that HCV burden in Italians is higher than expected.

Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Padova, Via Gabelli, Padova, Italy Received 1 January 2021 Accepted 7 January 2021 Correspondence to Monica Basso, MD, Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Padova, Via Gabelli 63, 35100 Padova, Italy, Tel: +00390498213052; fax: +00390498272355; e-mail: [email protected]

Background:Generally, about half of the patients with central nervous system infections cases remain unexplained. Therefore, we aimed to describe which viruses were detected in unselected patients with a suspected central nervous system infection and the first diagnostic workflow in a university hospital laboratory.Methods:A comprehensive virus testing in cerebrospinal fluid with an in-house real-time PCR method was employed. Determining how many and which viruses to test was at the full discretion of the treating physician.Results:1462 patients were evaluated from 2011 to 2017 and 9 898 viral PCRs were made: 176 subjects (12%) had a positive result. There was great heterogeneity in the frequency of patients tested for each virus, ranging from 97.9% (1431 out of 1462) for herpes simplex virus (HSV) to 1.9% (28 out of 1462) for Parvovirus B19, positive in 1 patient. Enterovirus (EV) was the leading virus detected: the frequency was higher with respect to HSV (5.2% vs 2.4%, p=0.0004), varicella-zoster virus (VZV)(5.2% vs 2.9%, p=0.0052), human herpesvirus-6 (5.2% vs 1.7%, p=0.0014) and human herpesvirus-7 (HHV-7)(5.2% vs 2.5%, p=0.0406). Both VZV (83.5%) and HSV (97.9%) were tested significantly more than EV (68.7%, p<0.0001) and HHV-7 (24.1%, p<0.0001): the latter had a positivity comparable to HSV and it was detected in younger patients (median age 29 years), as for EV (median age 35 years). There was no difference found in the age of positive subjects with respect to negative ones for the other viruses tested.Conclusion:EV was the fifth virus frequently included in the diagnostic workflow but the most frequently detected, mostly in subjects aged less 40, as HHV-7 was. Testing these two viruses in all younger patients could reduce the number of unknown etiology.

Objectives: This study aimed to describe the longitudinal evolution of neutralizing antibody titres (NtAb) in three different cohorts of healthcare workers (HCWs), including vaccinated HCWs with and without a previous SARS-CoV-2 infection and previously infected unvaccinated HCWs. COVID-19 was mild or asymptomatic in those experiencing infection. Methods: NtAb was tested before BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine (V0), 20±2 days after the first dose (V1_20), 20±3 days (V2_20) and 90±2 days (V2_90) after the second dose in vaccinated HCWs and after about 2 months (N_60), 10 months (N_300) and 13 months (N_390) from natural infection in unvaccinated HCWs. NtAb were measured by authentic virus neutralization with a SARS-CoV-2 B.1 isolate circulating in Italy at HCW enrolment. Results: Sixty-two HCWs were enrolled. NtAb were comparable in infected HCWs with no or mild disease at all the study points. NtAb of uninfected HCWs were significantly lower with respect to those of previously infected HCWs at V1_20, V2_20 and V2_90. The median NtAb fold decrease from V2_20 to V2_90 was higher in the uninfected HCWs with respect to those with mild infection (6.26 vs 2.58, p=0.03) and to asymptomatic HCWs (6.26 vs 3.67, p=0.022). The median Nabt at N_390 was significantly lower than at N_60 (p=0.007). Conclusions: In uninfected HCWs completing the two-dose vaccine schedule, a third mRNA vaccine dose is a reasonable option to counteract the substantial NtAb decline occurring at a significantly higher rate compared with previously infected, vaccinated HCWs. Although low, Nabt were still at a detectable level after 13 months in two-thirds of previously infected and unvaccinated HCWs.

ObjectivesTo measure SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody (NtAb) titres in previously infected or uninfected health care workers who received one or two doses of BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine.MethodsNtAbs were titrated as dose-inhibiting 50% virus replication (ID50) by live virus microneutralization. We evaluated 41 health care workers recovering from mild or asymptomatic infection at first vaccination dose (T1_inf) and 21 days later (T2_inf). Sixteen uninfected health care workers were evaluated 20 days after first dose (T2_uninf) and 20 days after second vaccine dose (T3_uninf).ResultsAt T2_inf, but not at T1_inf, there was a significant correlation between days from diagnosis (median 313, interquartile range 285–322) and NtAb levels (P = 0.011). NtAb titres increased at T2_inf with respect to T1_inf (1544 (732–2232) vs 26 (10–88), P < 0.001). Similarly, there was a significant increase in NtAb titres at T3_uninf compared with T2_uninf (183 (111–301) vs 5 (5–15), P < 0001). However, NtAb levels at T2_inf were significantly higher than those at T2_uninf and T3_uninf (P < 0.0001 for both analyses).ConclusionsA single vaccination in people with mild or asymptomatic previous infection further boosts SARS-CoV-2 humoral immunity to levels higher than those obtained by complete two-vaccination in uninfected subjects.

Background: Rapid detection and isolation of SARS-CoV-2 infections is critical to mitigate the pandemic;however, testing access across the US has been uneven and data on barriers to testing are limited. Methods: We conducted serial cross-sectional assessments of experiences around SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing in Florida, Illinois, and Maryland. We sampled ∼1000/state using an online survey from Jul 15-31 and Sep 16-Oct 15, 2020, with additional waves planned at 6-8 week intervals. At the time of surveys, there were no systematic differences in testing availability (public, private and free testing options) across these states. Participants were recruited using on online panel;demographic targets were provided to match age, sex, race/ethnicity and income distributions of each state. Participants were ≥18 years, provided consent, and resided in the study state. The survey covered demographics, symptoms, and PCR testing in the prior 2 weeks. Results: Of 3,058 persons surveyed most recently (Sep 16-Oct 15), 316 (10%) reported wanting/needing a test in the prior two weeks. Median age of participants wanting/needing a test was 36 years and 46% were female;47% self-identified as White and 57% reported working outside home. Of 316 who wanted/needed a test in the prior 2 weeks, 53% were able to get tested, of whom, 94% received results, with no significant differences by state (Figure);this was not substantially different from the proportion able to get tested in July (51%). Among those wanting/needing a test, getting tested was significantly less common among men (aOR: 0.46) and those reporting black race (aOR: 0.53) and more common in those reporting recent travel (aOR: 3.35;all p<0.05). The primary reasons for testing were desire to know status (35%) and symptoms (28%). Among those tested, 53% had to wait ≥8 days to get a result from the time they wanted/needed a test. Of those tested, 71% reported quarantining while awaiting results. An additional 146 who wanted/needed a test did not get tested;the main reasons for not testing in this group were not knowing where to go (36%) and distance/waiting time (33%);an additional 21% reported fear of being tested. Conclusion: These data reflecting similar testing barriers across three US states underscore the importance of a unified national strategy with clear messaging on who, where, when, and how to get a test, as well as improved turn-aroundtimes. As demand rises borrowing strategies from HIV such as self-testing could help overcome logistical barriers.

We aimed to investigate neutralizing antibody titers (NtAbT) to the P.1 and B.1 SARS-CoV-2 variants in a cohort of healthy health care workers (HCW), including 20 previously infected individuals tested at baseline (BLinf, after a median of 298 days from diagnosis) and 21 days after receiving one vaccine dose (D1inf) and 15 uninfected subjects tested 21 days after the second-dose vaccination (D2uninf). All the subjects received BNT162b2 vaccination. D1inf NtAbT increased significantly with respect to BLinf against both B.1 and P.1 variants, with a fold-change significantly higher for P.1. D1inf NtAbT were significantly higher than D2uninf NtAbT, against B.1 and P.1. NtAbT against the two strains were highly correlated. P.1 NtAbT were significantly higher than B.1 NtAbT. This difference was significant for post-vaccination sera in infected and uninfected subjects. A single-dose BNT162b2 vaccination substantially boosted the NtAb response to both variants in the previously infected subjects. NtAb titers to B.1 and P.1 lineages were highly correlated, suggesting substantial cross-neutralization. Higher titers to the P.1 than to the B.1 strain were driven by the post-vaccination titers, highlighting that cross-neutralization can be enhanced by vaccination.

We described short-term HIV tropism changes occurring in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and the correlations with HIV DNA value in HIV-HCV co-infected patients cured for HCV disease and with undetectable HIV viremia or residual viremia (RV). Plasma HIV RNA, cellular HIV DNA and tropism were evaluated pre-HCV treatment (baseline, BL) and at 12(T1) and 24(T2) weeks after HCV treatment start. V3 sequences were interpreted using Geno2pheno and classified as R5 only if all three sequences had an FPR ≥ 10% and as X4 when at least one replicate sequence had an FPR < 10%. Forty-nine patients (21 with X4 and 28 with R5 virus) were enrolled. Five X4 patients and 9 R5 subjects experienced at least one tropism change,11 with RV:1/5 patients with X4 infection at BL switched at T1 versus 8/9 in the R5 group (p = 0.022977) and the difference was confirmed in subjects with RV (p = 0.02);6/9 R5 patients switching at T1 confirmed the tropism change at T2. No significant differences in HIV DNA values between patients with RV starting with a R5 or X4 tropism and experienced tropism switch or not were found. Short-term tropism switch involved almost a third of patients, in all but three cases with HIV RV. Being R5 at BL is associated to a higher instability, expressed as number of tropism changes and confirmed switch at T2.

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the presence of anti-hepatitis B (HBV) c antibodies (HBcAb positivity) could influence the control of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) viremia in patients living with HIV (PLWH) who switch a to two-drug antiretroviral therapy (2DR) containing lamivudine (3TC) (2DR-3TC). A retrospective observational multicenter study was conducted on 166 PLWH switching to the 2DR-3TC-based regimen: 58 HBcAb-positive and 108 HBcAb-negative patients. The HBcAb-positive PLWH group demonstrated a significantly higher percentage of subjects with very low-level viremia at all time points after switching (6th month: < 31% vs 17.6%, p = 0.047; 12th month 34% vs 27.5%, p = 0.001; 24th month 37% vs 34.2, p = 0.003 of the HBcAb-positive and HBcAb-negative groups, respectively) and a higher percentage of subjects with detectable HIV RNA greater than 20 copies/mL 12 and 24 months after switching (12 months 32% vs 11%, p = 0.001; 24 months 37% vs 13.9%, p = 0.003 of the HBcAb-positive and HBcAb-negative groups, respectively). Logistic regression analysis showed that an increase in age of ten years (OR 2.48 (95% CI 1.58–3.89), p < 0.0001) and the presence of HBcAb positivity (OR 2.7 (5% CI 1.05–6.9), p = 0.038) increased the risk of detectability of HIV RNA by nearly three-fold after switching to 2DR-3TC.

While SARS-CoV-2 vaccination of uninfected hosts is proceeding worldwide, whether and how to vaccinate those recovered from natural infection remains debatable.A single-dose mRNA vaccine administration has been reported to boost SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies (NtAb) in subjects with past infection [1,2] while the effect of a second dose in such subjects has not been documented.Within a health care worker (HCW) surveillance and vaccination program running at a SARS-CoV-2 referral hospital, we assessed the dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 NtAb in 22 uninfected and 34 previously infected individuals who completed the 2-dose schedule of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine.All the subjects received the second dose vaccine 3 weeks after the first dose.The subjects included in the uninfected group had no SARS-COV-2 RNA detection in the tests performed according to the hospital surveillance program and at the time of NtAb testing.In addition, all the subjects had been tested for the presence of a neutralizing antibody titer at baseline, i.e., at the time of the first vaccine administration, and confirmed as negative.NtAb titers were determined in a live virus assay in VERO E6 cells infected by a lineage B.1 isolate and defined as the reciprocal of the serum dilution decreasing virus replication by 50% (EC 50 ), as measured by the CellTiter-Glo ® Luminescent Cell Viability Assay (Promega) [3].

AbstractWe describe the time course of neutralizing antibody (NtAb) titer in a cohort of health care workers with mild or asymptomatic severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) infection. NtAb levels decreased over time; however, serum neutralizing activity remained detectable after a median of 7 months from SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis in the majority of cases.

Abstract Background In Italy the pandemic of COVID-19 infection has placed an enormous burden on health authorities: contact precautions are required to avoid viral transmission and people should be subjected to standard infection control procedures. This is crucial in a country experiencing a high number of confirmed cases of COVID-19 infection in Europe and where multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GN) are endemic.The aim of this study was to compare the prevalence of MDR-GN in surveillance rectal swabs (SRS) and in clinical samples (CS) in the period March 1,2020-April, 24 2020 with respect to the previous 2-month period and to the previous year. Methods The first SRS and the first CS with a MDR-GN isolate detected from 01/01/2019 to 24/04/2020 were included. Analysis was made by comparing three different study periods in 2019 and 2020 (Jan-Dec 2019, Jan-Feb 2020, and Mar-Apr 2020), for medical department, surgical department and intensive care department. Results Overall, 612 MDR-GN organisms were identified (399 SRS and 213 CS): carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and Acinetobacter baumanii (CPAB) were the most frequently detected (Figure 1). We observed an increased relative frequency of patients with MDR-GN detected in CS respect to those found in SRS (32.7% vs 44.5% vs 70.6%, p=0.0005): 5/12 CS detected in the last period were isolated from the respiratory tract (Figure 2). Nine patients with COVID-19 pneumonia had MDR-GN. All but two patients had a previous negative SRS performed 4 days before (median value) and the median interval between COVID-19 positivity and MDR-GN positivity was 7 days.The six patients with CPAB isolation were all hospitalized in the same ward, with partially overlapping hospital stays during the study period. In 5 of them, CPAB was detected in the respiratory tract (Figure 3). Conclusion The first detection of MDR-GN in CS and the nosocomial MDR-GN acquisition despite cohorting due to COVID-19 infection underline the need to reinforce infection control measures in a high prevalence country during COVID-19 pandemia. A correct antimicrobial policy urged because, according to published data, most patients with COVID-19 infection received antimicrobial therapy: furthermore MDR-GN infection could play a role in the negative outcome of these patients. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures