The Olympic Games are generally influenced by political factors. In 2018, a "referendum" was introduced to promote "the name rectification" for the 2020 Tokyo Olympic Games. Due to the significant reduction of the threshold for "referendum" in Taiwan, the "veto" structure in the original "referendum" operating system has been loosened, and obvious political and social differences have emerged within Taiwan. By reviewing the completion process of the 2018 "name rectification" for the 2020 Tokyo Olympic Games, it can be found that on the one hand, due to the reduction in the threshold for "referendum" by Taiwan’s legislature, the possibility of some political forces manipulating the "referendum" along with the Olympic cycle has increased; On the other hand, the mainland and the International Olympic Committee are important external veto factors in Taiwan’s "referendum", and public opinion on both sides is prone to collide on this question. As the continuous evolution of Taiwan’s political localization, more quasi "sovereignty" issues similar to "the name rectification referendum" will be operated in a "referendum" manner, and its exemplary effect deserves attention.
当前,台海形势及中美关系的发展均不乐观,面临不少挑战和难题.美国勾连盟友力推"三海联动",并炒作"安全恐慌",造成地区局势高度紧张.美方不断派遣军机穿航台湾海峡以凸显"国际空域"的"自由",为其操纵涉台问题和损害中国安全利益制造法理依据.在所谓解放军军机"侵入""台湾防空识别区"问题上,美方亦多有歪曲解读和舆论误导,充分暴露其主张"航行和飞越自由"的标准不一.在当前台海"新常态"下,中美军机在台海周边空域密集行动确有可能引发"意外事件".为避免误判和紧张局势升级,中美双方可视情在现有危机管控机制的基础上适时推展"细则"磋商.
以大陆A股上市台资企业数字化转型与绿色创新之间关系为研究对象,从企业高管绿色认知视角分析大陆A股上市台资企业数字化转型影响绿色创新的作用机理,在理论分析的基础上定量研究数字化转型对绿色转型的影响效应及内外部因素对二者关系的调节效应.研究发现:大陆A股上市台资企业数字化转型能够提升企业绿色创新水平;环境规制强度会提升大陆A股上市台资企业数字化转型对绿色创新的影响效应,而企业声誉、融资成本、产业集中度、投资者关注度则会抑制大陆A股上市台资企业数字化转型对绿色创新的影响效应.因此.大陆A股上市台资企业应进一步提升高管的绿色认知,在加大对数字化转型投入的同时还需积极应对企业声誉、融资成本、产业集中度和投资者关注度的抑制效应.
中美两国围绕台湾问题的博弈尚在和平与冲突的前景间摇摆.此不确定性的核心因素之一,即美国在台海的延伸威慑是否可信.自冷战以来,随着美国的相对衰落和联盟承诺负担的持续扩张,其威慑战略越发依赖地区盟友的配合.从政治层面来看,中美台海博弈实质上是美国对台再保证与中国反说服之间的较量.因此,美国对台再保证的生效机制,是中国应对举措的重要参考.同盟文献对此提出的传统理论洞见,即再保证的效应取决于传递同盟可靠性的信号是否产生足够"昂贵"的成本.近年来,国际关系学界的"情感革命"正在挑战这一范式.以冷战时期两次台海危机前后台湾地区领导人对美可靠性的认知过程为例,说明基于情感效用信号的分析框架是取代昂贵信号理论的有效路径.这对于建立基于领导人心理,研判美国涉台外交政策效应的科学体系具有实际意义.
台湾地区文化创意产业发展起步较早,曾取得积极成效.但是,民进党当局操弄"去中国化",使台胞遭遇精神家园迷失风险,台湾地区文化创意产业发展也处于滞缓状态.文化传播是文化创意产业的主要功能之一,应用传播学指导文化创意产业发展对厚植文创产品的文化传播属性具有重要的实践价值.以传播学为视角,紧扣传播内容、传播载体、传播渠道等三个环节,分析台湾地区文化创意产业在创意提取策略、创意转化路径、营销推广模式的经验与不足.台湾地区应深耕中华文化沃土,以文化创意产业作为两岸优先融合发展的领域,与大陆共同打造中国特色文化创意国际品牌,做大做强两岸共同文化市场,从而更好凝聚文化和市场的合力,助推台湾地区文化创意产业创新发展.
随着美国对华战略竞争程度的提升,拜登行政当局干涉我国台湾问题的手段出现较为明显的变化,形成以"复合型介入"为核心的新型涉台政策.不同于美国自冷战以来介入台海问题的传统路径和新兴路径,"复合型介入"以"灰色地带""混合战争"和"一体化威慑"为概念基础,衍生出政治、法案、同盟、经济、外事和议题等策略类型,具有多主体性、融合性、模糊性和多维性等特征.通过揭示"复合型介入"的内涵、特征和形成机理,以解构这一新型涉台政策的逻辑.以政治策略和外事策略为例,二者之间的相互叠加和相互强化展示了"复合型介入"的具体运作逻辑及其效果.大陆需以"混合战争"为基础,形成军事战为主,政治战、外交战、舆论战和认知战为辅的威慑机制,丰富反介入的工具箱,与美国日渐复杂、多元和细致的涉台政策构成对等的政策匹配.
两岸家书记载了两岸同胞割舍不断的血脉渊源和浓厚深沉的家国情怀,是两岸同胞交流交往的直接见证.加强两岸家书征藏保护与活化利用,有利于弘扬中华优秀传统文化、促进两岸同胞心灵契合、有力驳斥"台独"分裂势力.目前,各地通过党报、网站、微信公众号等征集到数量较为可观的两岸家书,但在公藏机构规范保存、保护的家书数量还严重不足.其征藏保护与活化利用还存在易散佚、宣传再创工作迟滞、共享壁垒、数字化任重道远、学术研究不深等问题.为此,应持续加强两岸家书的征集保护力度、整理和发掘两岸家书的多元价值、加强两岸家书的活化利用,以发挥两岸家书"以情促融"的作用,增进两岸文化进一步融合发展.
《中共中央 国务院关于支持福建探索海峡两岸融合发展新路建设两岸融合发展示范区的意见》(以下简称《意见》)是一份凝聚着经验、智慧、情感,并具有很强操作性的文件.闽台历史之渊源,有力证明《意见》是有历史经验支持的明智决策.《意见》提出要"实施闽台历史展示溯源工程",建议该工程讲好闽台区域社会的历史故事,讲好"两岸一家亲,闽台亲上亲"的道理.闽台两地民间信俗交流活动历史悠久,建议按照《意见》精神,深化闽台民间信俗交流,开展形式多样的民间信俗交流活动,强化妈祖等民间信仰精神纽带作用.《意见》向台湾同胞提供了毫无保留的、全方位的发展机遇,建议借鉴台湾光复初期闽台两地友爱互助、共渡难关的历史经验,建设好两岸融合发展示范区,两岸同胞共享中华民族伟大复兴机遇.
Songjiang Array rose in the coastal areas of Fujian in the Ming Dynasty, and was introduced to Taiwan Province by Zheng Chenggong in the late Ming Dynasty. Over the past century, Songjiang Array has been active in folk festivals in Fujian and Taiwan. In recent years, it has been selected as one of "the Twelve Large Local Festivals in Taiwan" and listed on the Fujian Intangible Cultural Heritage List. The writing of Songjiang Array in Taiwan’s literature mainly concentrated in the 1920s, 1930s, 1970s, and after the new century, which chronically showed the changes of colonial modernity, cultural roots, daily writing, film adaptation and so on. In comparison, there were few historical accounts and literary descriptions of Songjiang Array in Chinese Mainland. The writing of Songjiang Array in Taiwan could not only make up for the shortcomings of local literature and fill the gap in the writing of intangible cultural heritage, but also record the historical experience of Songjiang Array after it was transferred to Taiwan in a literary way, linking the colonial modernity of Taiwan society, the trend of thought of returning to tradition, and the local cultural response under the impact of globalization.
The One China principle is the core legal basis for the Chinese government and people to oppose external interference in the Taiwan question. Focusing on the factual basis of the One China principle, the conclusion that "Taiwan is part of China’s territory" has formed a discourse expression based on international law, covering the triple logic of "since ancient times", "Taiwan’s restoration" and "universal recognition". Under the influence of the three elements of national strength, struggle strategy, and legal basis, the expression of the One China principle in international law discourse has achieved remarkable results. However, in the face of the practical difficulties caused by "the endogenous discourse deconstruction" discourse formed by the combination of "Taiwan independence" discourse and the intervention discourse, the response of traditional discourse expression is not yet sufficient. In this regard, "the endogenous discourse construction" of the One China principle should be carried out by appealing to the internal authority of the Chinese people and China’s domestic legal resources, especially constitutional resources, to strengthen the expression of the One China principle in international law discourse.
The construction of a community with a shared future across the Taiwan Strait has a solid national, cultural, and historical foundation. People on both sides of the Taiwan Strait belong to Chinese nation, and Chinese culture has become the common cultural foundation for both sides. At the same time, both sides have experienced the decline of Chinese nation. At present, a community with a shared future between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait is in the process of formation, and this process may continue until the reunification of the two sides. The community with a shared future between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait will ultimately reach an ideal state of deep integration and high unity within the community. Shared cultural values will be formed within the community, and members of the community will have a strong sense of belonging to Chinese nation. The community can cope with external risks and challenges. The construction of a community with a shared future across the Taiwan Strait requires rebuilding the historical memory of Taiwan residents towards Chinese nation, practicing the concept of community, forming a discourse system related to the community, making the great rejuvenation of Chinese nation a common goal for both sides of the Taiwan Strait, and handling the commonalities and differences within the community well. Building a community with a shared future across the Taiwan Strait will provide Taiwan with a brighter development prospect. Both sides will be able to jointly participate in the historical process of the great rejuvenation of Chinese nation.
Identity is the prerequisite and foundation for promoting peaceful reunification across the Taiwan Strait. At present, the mainstream public opinion in Taiwan is "maintaining the stability of the current situation", but "maintaining the current situation" is full of confusion and contradictions in seeking stability and fear of change; The "Taiwan subject consciousness" implies a dual connotation of "Taiwan identity" and the pursuit of "sovereign independence", and even "independence identity" is generalized within "Taiwan identity", but the two cannot be directly equated; Although "the unification faction" of the Pan-blue camp all support reunification, there are also contradictions and confusion about "Chinese identity". The root cause is mainly the result of multiple factors such as interest orientation, institutional differences, negative historical memories, national education orientation, media politicization, and US intervention. In the context of the drastic changes in the global political and economic landscape and the entry of a new stage in the strategic game between China and the United States, in order to break through the dilemma of national identity among Taiwan residents and promote peaceful reunification, it is necessary to adhere to the principles of "promoting politics through economy", "promoting integration through harmony", "spreading information through media" and other institutional reform, necessary to form a strong social magnetic effect under the influence of military deterrence, and necessary to build a more inclusive national and ethnic identity in the process of promoting cross-Strait integration and development.
In the process of cross-Strait exchanges, many unexpected events have an opportunity structure to shift towards controversial issues, which is a reflection of the structural dilemma of cross-Strait relations. When controversial events are linked to political issues and interpreted from political positions, perspectives, and struggles, once social differences turn into political confrontation, politicization of controversial issues occurs. Due to the differentiation of cognitive structure, the tension of identity recognition and the mismatch between legitimacy and authority in controversial issues, individuals or organizations on both sides or one side of the Taiwan Strait use symbolic symbols to promote widespread public participation in confrontation, an event will develop towards politicization. Confrontation has emerged in the politicization of controversial issues between Chinese mainland’s ethnic/national discourse framework and Taiwan region’s value/Taiwan discourse framework. The Taiwan side often confuses and criticizes the rule of law through democratic discourse, striving to construct the discourse reality of so-called "Taiwan identity". In this regard, Chinese mainland should conduct discourse regulation in terms of ideas, methods and practices based on the consensus on the rule of law of the cross-Strait society.
Taiwan residents were compelled to speak Japanese under the high pressure of the Japan colonialism during the Japanese colonial rule. Leftist progressives and Taiwan patriots realized the urgency of popularizing the Chinese language and abolishing Japanese during the Anti Japanese War. Taiwan was restored on October 25, 1945. Regardless of various difficulties and resistances, the Education Bureau of the Taiwan Provincial Chief Executive’s Office made every effort to convene the Chinese language teachers and explore teaching plans to popularize Chinese, achieving initial results. In order to promote the concept of "Taiwan residents are Chinese" and accelerate the convergence of education between Taiwan Province and the mainland, the Education Bureau organized the rewriting of primary school Chinese textbooks in 1946. The new textbooks of Chinese not only focused on cultivating national identity, but also took into account the local conditions of Taiwan, the national conditions of the motherland, the world situation and other knowledge. Indeed, there were still some shortcomings in the Chinese education of elementary schools in Taiwan during the early days of the restoration, such as difficulty in textbook content, expensive textbooks, and a lack of high-level teachers. However, it is necessary for primary school students in Taiwan Province to receive basic education and learn Chinese and its pronunciation. The efforts of the Education Department played an important role in "the Chinese Movement" during the early stage of Taiwan’s recovery.
The mainland adheres to the people-centered work philosophy towards Taiwan, promotes cross-Strait economic and trade cooperation from scattered, sporadic to close, hot, and relatively stable state over a long period of time, bringing tangible benefits to Taiwan residents and companies. However, due to the escalating suppression and containment of the United States against China, the continuous obstruction of the Taiwan authorities to the development of cross-Strait relations, and the impact of the COVID-19, the production of Taiwan’s export regions and overseas orders has accelerated their transfer, and the diversification trend of Taiwan investment has increased. Faced with the new challenges of cross-Strait economic and trade cooperation, the mainland will always take the overall interests of the Chinese nation, including Taiwan compatriots, as the starting point, adhere to the development concept of putting the people at the center, fully leverage the support role of the mainland in Taiwan’s economic development, and provides new momentum and space for cross-Strait economic and trade cooperation in the new era by enriching the connotation and practice of cross-Strait economic and trade cooperation, improving the legal system of cross-Strait economic and trade cooperation, and constructing a cooperation mechanism that "economies on both sides of the Strait belong to the Chinese nation".
In August 1963, Hu Qiuyuan, a well-known pro-unification figure, founded the The Journal of Chunghwa in Taiwan, which lasted for 31 years and ended in December 1993. Since its inception, The Journal of Chunghwa has always advocated the three dignity of "nationality, knowledge and personality". Before 1987, it took safeguarding the Chinese nation as the purpose, and after the lifting of "martial law" in Taiwan, it advocated the reunification of China and national identity of the Chinese nation based on the principle of safeguarding China’s unity. Under the complex cross-Strait background at that time, The Journal of Chunghwa held high the banner of nationalism, adhered to nationalism, and maintained the unity and unification of the Chinese nation. It opposed the "Taiwan independence" separatist forces, actively promoted the patriotic concept of Chinese culture and national identity, and took a clear stand against "Taiwan independence" and promoted the patriotic deeds of reunification. The patriotic spirit of vigorously promoting Chinese nationalism and opposing national division has stood out for ages and be honored by later generations.The Chinese nationalism view of The Journal of Chunghwa has made an indelible contribution to safeguarding national interests and "opposing independence and promoting reunification". It has far-reaching influence on both sides of the Taiwan Strait and has played a positive and important role in the modern history of Taiwan.
Under different economic and social backgrounds, Chinese mainland and Taiwan region have formed vastly different professional qualification systems. With the continuous expansion of personnel communication and exchanges in various fields between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait, the mainland actively conducts cross-Strait vocational qualification comparisons to break down the recognition barriers of vocational certificates in the mainland, promote the common use of vocational qualifications across the Taiwan Strait, and promote the integration and development of cross-Strait integration. Especially in terms of accepting professional qualifications of Taiwan, experience and practices such as "strict measures for high qualifications", "one-way implementation", and "equal treatment" have been comprehensively promoted, opening up a convenient channel for Taiwan residents to go to the mainland for employment and opening up a new path to solve the current dilemma of cross-Strait communication. However, in the practical process of promoting the convergence of professional qualifications across the Taiwan Strait, there are also issues such as inaccurate comparison of professional qualifications, inadequate policy promotion and implementation, and the failure to form a relevant service matrix. In this regard, the accuracy of cross-Strait vocational qualification comparisons should be continuously improved, with standardized services for vocational qualification examination certification for Taiwan residents as the center, and the common service chain for vocational qualifications across the Taiwan Strait should be further extended to promote better integration of people in Taiwan into the mainland vocational qualification system.
2019年,民进党利用其在台湾地区立法机关的席次优势,强行"三读"通过"反渗透法"."反渗透法"是破坏祖国统一的分裂之法、切断两岸联系的反交流之法和侵犯台湾人民自由的恶法,严重破坏两岸政治互信的基础、致使两岸双向投资金额逐渐减少、增加台湾民众融入大陆社会的难度、割裂台湾民众对中华文化的认同.为此,应扎实推进新时代反"独"促统工作、深化两岸经济融合发展、落实落细台胞同等待遇政策、构建两岸共同的文化和历史记忆,以及完善和运用法律手段制裁"台独"分裂行径,稳定台海局势,进而推进祖国统一大业.
由于数字媒介的普及与民粹主义在全球泛滥高度重合,民粹主义大行其道往往被归因于数字媒介的推动.随着数字媒介技术的发展,数字媒介去中心化与集中化、言论自由与舆论极化、透明性与算法黑箱等矛盾性特征,使人们格外担忧其给社会变迁带来的影响.而数字媒介在制造对立的身份认同、助长非理性政治参与、传播耸人听闻的观点主张、推动受众观念的政治极化等方面,确实同民粹主义"相辅相成".台湾民主政治一直因民粹主义色彩而被广为诟病.在数字媒介环境下,台湾民粹主义呈现网红政治、情绪政治、极化政治的新形态,不断加剧岛内民众身份认同的异化、阻碍两岸理性沟通,进而增加两岸和平统一的难度.分析数字媒介环境下台湾民粹主义的变化与影响,对把握台湾社会政治现状和两岸关系走势兼具理论和现实意义.
"九二共识"作为时代发展的产物,不仅助推台海两岸正式从内战状态走向和平交流、融合发展,而且成为提升两岸关系和处理两岸关系新问题的政治基石,在两岸关系和平发展时代发挥了独特的功能,作出了特别的贡献.但近年来中美关系的转折性变化、岛内社会统一意识大幅下降和对两岸统一的畏惧心理逐渐升高,以及民进党等"台独"势力追求分裂的政治操作,使"九二共识"面临着严峻的时代挑战.在推进祖国完全统一进程的新时代,"九二共识"的核心意涵不可改变,其搭建两岸沟通桥梁、推动两岸关系和平发展并走向和平统一的历史使命不会因时代的变化而变化.当然,"九二共识"的任务是阶段性的,一旦两岸和平统一,其历史使命也将终结,但"九二共识"必将作为两岸统一历史过程中的一段佳话载入史册.
