在认罪认罚从宽制度的适用中,从宽处理是核心要义.从宽处理包括实体和程序两方面的内容,实体上的从宽处罚包括从轻、减轻以及免除处罚三种形态,程序上的从宽处理表现为适用或变更为轻缓强制措施、撤销案件、作出不起诉决定以及适用简化审理程序等形式.在认罪认罚案件中,量刑建议不再是检察机关单方面的意思表示,而是控辩协商或沟通后的诉讼合意.量刑建议应当以确定刑为主、幅度刑为辅.量刑建议对被追诉人、检察机关而言有遵守义务,对法院而言有尊重职责.《刑事诉讼法》第201条是认罪认罚从宽制度适用中的重要规范,其中,认罪认罚轻刑案件的法庭审理对象,应当是被追诉人认罪认罚的自愿性和认罪认罚具结书内容的真实性、合法性;"一般应当采纳"指的是除五种例外情形外,法院应当采纳检察机关的量刑建议.在量刑建议的异议处理程序中,法院应当告知检察机关调整量刑建议,且检察机关调整或者维持量刑建议是法院判决的前置程序.认罪认罚案件中,被告人的上诉权应当受到保障,同时施加一定合理限制.以认罪认罚案件被告人上诉程序的调整为契机,将带动我国刑事审级制度的进一步改革与完善.
During the case detection of the public security organs,the active criminals and important suspects can be detained in advance according to the seven cases prescribed in Article 61 of Criminal Suit Lawin order to guarantee the smooth conduct.Criminal custody and administrative custody,though both depriving of man's freedom for the time being,are guite different in nature.For the standardization of the behavior of the public security organs and also for effectively guaranteeing civic right,it is necessary to discuss some correlated problem existing in the process of change.The paper will discuss five problems superficially.
The paper analyzes the present situation of China's judicial expert testimony system, compares the legislate techniques and the litigate experience in the Anglo-American law system and the Continental law system and points out the problems with the judicial expert testimony system in China. Accordingly, it puts forward a reform plan in terms of judicial expert testimony system, identifier, identifying process and identifying conclusion.
完善诉讼程序,从制度上保证审判机关和检察机关依法独立公开地行使审判权和检察权,进而保障公民和法人的合法权益,刑诉法再修改确有必要,应尽快纳入议事日程.