Background. The national observational program MPN-QoL-2020 was focused on quality of life (QoL) and symptoms in patients with classical Ph-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) in the Russian Federation, as well as on the perception of the disease and treatment from the patient's and physician's perspective. Aim. To evaluate QoL in patients with different MPNs using new standardized questionnaires, to assess the most common symptoms and their impact on QoL in patients with myelofibrosis (MF), polycythemia vera (PV) and essential throm-bocythemia (ET), and to characterize the perception of the disease and treatment concerns from patients' perspective and their treating physicians' perspective. Materials & Methods. In total 1100 patients with MPNs (MF: n = 355, PV: n = 408, and ET: n = 337; mean age 58 ± 14 years; 61 % women) and 100 hematologists (mean age 42 ± 12 years; 85 % women) from 37 medical centers in 8 Federal districts of the Russian Federation participated in the study. All the patients filled out symptom assessment tool (MPN10), QoL questionnaire for patients with hematological nancies (HM-PRO) and patient's survey checklist; physicians filled out physician's survey checklist and patient record for each patient included in the study. Results. For the first time in Russia in a representative population of MPN patients in the real-world setting, QoL and symptom profiles in patients with different MPNs were characterized and symptom impact on the daily living of MPN patients was identified. MPN patients exhibited QoL impairment: noticeable detriments in physical and emotional functioning, as well as in eating and drinking regimen were found, social functioning was less impaired. More than one third of MPN patients had significant QoL impairment. The vast majority of patients experienced fatigue: 92.6 % MF patients, 83.7 % PI patients, and 82 % ET patients. Symptom prevalence severity differed across different MPNs. Top disease-related symptoms to be resolved were identified from patient's and physician's perspective. Discrepancies in the attitudes of MPN patients and their treating physicians to various aspects regarding the disease and its treatment were found as well as issues needed to be improved in the patient-physician communication were identified. Conclusion. The results of national research program MPN-QoL-2020 allowed to identify the areas of QoL impairment and symptom burden in MPN patients in Russia, to verify areas of concern related to the disease and its treatment in patients with different MPNs, as well as to highlight the unmet needs in this patients' population in our country. The outcomes of the study may contribute to establishing recommendations for improving/maintaining QoL in patients with MPNs and to developing measures aimed to raise awareness of this patients' population about the disease and its treatment.

Актуальность. Национальная наблюдательная программа МПН-КЖ-2020 была направлена на получение данных об особенностях качества жизни и симптомов, а также восприятия болезни и лечения при классических Ph-негативных миелопролиферативных новообразованиях (МПН) в Российской Федерации с точки зрения пациентов и врачей. Цель. При использовании новых стандартизованных опросников изучить качество жизни пациентов с различными МПН, дать характеристику наиболее распространенным симптомам и их влиянию на качество жизни больных миелофиброзом (МФ), истинной полицитемией (ИП) и эссенциальной тромбоцитемией (ЭТ), охарактеризовать восприятие проблем, связанных с заболеванием и лечением, с точки зрения самих пациентов и их лечащих врачей-гематологов. Материалы и методы. В исследование включено 1100 пациентов с Ph-негативными МПН (355 — с МФ, 408 — с ИП и 337 — с ЭТ; средний возраст пациентов 58 ± 14 лет, 61 % женщин). В исследовании также участвовали 100 врачей-гематологов (средний возраст 42 ± 12 лет, 85 % женщин) из 37 ЛПУ в 8 федеральных округах РФ. В рамках исследования пациенты однократно заполняли специальный опросник для оценки симптомов МПН (MPN10), специальный опросник качества жизни у онкогематологических больных (HM-PRO), а также опросный лист пациента. Гематологи однократно заполняли опросный лист врача, а также «карту пациента» на всех включенных ими в исследование больных МПН. Результаты. В условиях реальной клинической практики впервые в России получены данные об особенностях качества жизни пациентов с Ph-негативными МПН, профиле симптомов при разных вариантах МПН и степени их влияния на повседневную жизнь. Больные МПН имеют нарушения качества жизни, которые в большей степени касаются физического и эмоционального функционирования, а также режима приема пищи и питья, в меньшей — социального функционирования. Более чем у 1/3 больных с Ph-негативными МПН зарегистрировано значительное нарушение качества жизни. У подавляющего большинства пациентов отмечается слабость: при МФ — у 92,6 %, при ИП — у 83,7 %, при ЭТ — у 82 %. Профили актуальных симптомов и их выраженность отличаются при разных МПН. Определены симптомы, более всего требующие коррекции с точки зрения пациентов и врачей. Установлены расхождения в оценках пациентов и их лечащих врачей в отношении к заболеванию и проводимому лечению, а также аспекты, нуждающиеся в улучшении при взаимодействии пациент-врач. Заключение. Результаты, полученные в рамках национальной наблюдательной программы МПН-КЖ-2020, позволили выявить особенности нарушений качества жизни больных МПН в России. Определен спектр специфических проблем, связанных с заболеванием и лечением, которые характерны для этих пациентов. Кроме того, актуализированы неудовлетворенные потребности этой категории пациентов в нашей стране. Результаты программы МПН-КЖ-2020 могут использоваться при подготовке рекомендаций по улучшению/поддержанию качества жизни пациентов с Ph-негативными МПН и для разработки мероприятий, направленных на повышение осведомленности больных МПН о заболевании и его лечении.

The aim of the study was to evaluate the quality of life (QoL) and symptoms in patients with myelofibrosis (MF). 93 patients with MF who participated in the multicenter observational study “Quality of life and symptoms in myelofibrosis: validation of the symptom assessment tool for patients with myelofibrosis” (2014–2015) were enrolled in the analysis. 62 patients received best available treatment (BAT) and 31 patients received ruxolitinib. All the patients filled out the SF-36, CSP-Myelofibrosis Module and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) tools. In the real-world study in MF patients QoL was demonstrated to be significantly worse than in healthy controls; more than one third of patients had significant or severe QoL impairment. Patients treated with ruxolitinib had better QoL and lower symptom severity as compared to BAT patients. Decline of activity appeared to be the major symptom which significantly reduced QoL in MF patients. QoL and symptom data in MF patients during treatment in a real world setting may be a solid supplement to clinical variables and may contribute to better disease control in accordance with the principles of risk-adaptive therapy.

Background & Aims. The article presents results of two observational, prospective, multicenter studies “Quality of Life, Symptom Profile, and Adherence to Treatment in Adult Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Receiving Dasatinib” (20122015) and “Quality of Life and Symptom Profile in Imatinib-Resistant or Intolerant Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia” (2011-2014). Methods. Data of 107 patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase were involved in the real-world analysis - 32 newly diagnosed patients on first-line treatment with dasatinib or after yearly switch to dasatinib after ima-tinib treatment failure and 75 imatinib-resistant or intolerant patients on second-line treatment with dasatinib. Treatment effectiveness and safety of dasatinib were assessed during first- and second-line dasatinib treatment using clinical outcomes as well as quality of life and symptom profile assessment. Results. The real-world data obtained during observational study in limited population of CML patients conform the results of clinical trials devoted to evaluation of treatment efficacy and safety of dasatinib treatment in first- and second-line treatment and demonstrate the importance of patient-reported outcomes. Patient's quality of life improved within 12 months of the first-line dasatinib therapy according to the following scales: role physical functioning, pain, vitality, social functioning and role emotional functioning. The most pronounced and clinically significant improvement was observed for the role emotional functioning (51.1 vs. 68.9). During the second-line dasatinib treatment, stabilization of quality of life parameters was registered for the following scales: vitality, social functioning, mental health, and pain. Significant improvement of the Integral Quality of Life Index was observed (p < 0.05). Positive dynamics of relevant symptoms was registered. The symptom severity decreased during both the first- and second-line therapy. Conclusion. Quality of life and symptom assessment in CML patients contribute to a better disease control in accordance with the principles of risk-adaptive therapy.

The aim of the study was to evaluate the quality of life (QoL) and symptoms in patients with myelofibrosis (MF). 93 patients with MF who participated in the multicenter observational study "Quality of life and symptoms in myelofibrosis: validation of the symptom assessment tool for patients with myelofibrosis' (2014-2015) were enrolled in the analysis. 62 patients received best available treatment (BAT) and 31 patients received ruxolitinib. All the patients filled out the SF-36, CSP-Myelofibrosis Module and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) tools. In the real-world study in MF patients QoL was demonstrated to be significantly worse than in healthy controls; more than one third of patients had significant or severe QoL impairment. Patients treated with ruxolitinib had better QoL and lower symptom severity as compared to BAT patients. Decline of activity appeared to be the major symptom which significantly reduced QoL in MF patients. QoL and symptom data in MF patients during treatment in a real worldsetting may be a solid supplement to clinical variables and may contribute to better disease control in accordance with the principles of risk-adaptive therapy.

The article is focused on the results of the multicenter observational study “Quality of life and symptom profile in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase in long-term follow-up of second-line treatment” (2012–2015). Thirty imatinib-resistant or-intolerant patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase were observed in the real-world clinical setting during 24 months after start of second-line treatment with dasatinib. Mean age – 48 years old (SD = 13.1); males / females – 14 / 16; one third of patients were with comorbidity, Charlson Index – 0–5 scores. All the patients received dasatinib in the dosage of 100 mg daily. Study time points – 12, 18 and 24 months after second-line treatment start. Treatment outcomes were analyzed in terms of clinical efficacy and safety as well as in terms of patient-reported outcomes, including quality of life and symptom profile assessment. For quality of life and symptom assessment the SF-36 and CSP-CML questionnaires were used, respectively. Statisticallly significant changes in quality of life and symptom severity were analyzed by generalized estimated equation (GEE). Complete hematological response was observed in 96.3 % patients, complete cytogenetic response – in 66.6 % patients, complete or major molecular response – in 60 % patients. The acceptable tolerability of dasatinib treatment was shown during long-term follow-up: hematological and non-hematological serious adverse events were rare and didn’t lead to treatment discontinuation. Significant improvement of physical functioning, role physical functioning, role emotional functioning, vitality and mental health as compared to base-line parameters was observed (p < 0.05). The severity of a number pronounced symptoms decreased and the proportion of patients with severe symptoms reduced (p = 0.01) after 24 months of second-line treatment start. Quality of life treatment response in terms of stabilization or improvement was registered in 83 % of patients. The data of this real-world study in CML patients are in line with the results of clinical studies in terms of dasatinib treatment efficacy and safety. In addition, they demonstrate the value of patient-reported outcomes to evaluate benefits and risks of long-term dasatinib treatment from patient perspective.