Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with heart failure (HF). However, it is unclear if postoperative AF (POAF) following non-cardiac surgery differs from non-surgical AF in terms of the risk of HF. We compared the long-term rate of incident HF in patients developing new-onset POAF following non-cardiac surgery with patients who did not develop POAF following non-cardiac surgery and patients with non-surgical non-valvular AF (NVAF). Using Danish nationwide registries, all patients aged ≥30 years who developed POAF following non-cardiac surgery (1996–2020) were identified and matched in a 1:3 ratio by age, sex, surgery type (only for the surgery group), selected comorbidities, and inclusion year with patients without POAF following non-cardiac surgery and individuals with NVAF, respectively. A total of 2270 patients with POAF were matched with 6810 patients without POAF following non-cardiac surgery, and 1846 patients with POAF were matched with 5538 patients with NVAF. The median follow-up was 7.2 years. Compared with patients without POAF, those with POAF had a higher associated long-term rate of incident HF (2.6 vs. 1.2 events per 100 person-years; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 2.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.06–2.78). Compared with individuals with NVAF, patients with POAF did not have a significantly different rate of incident HF (2.7 vs. 3.0 events per 100 person-years; adjusted HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.78–1.03). Patients with new-onset POAF following non-cardiac surgery had a higher associated long-term rate of incident HF compared to those without POAF, with no significant difference in the rate of incident HF when compared to patients with NVAF.

BACKGROUND:Major emergency abdominal surgery is associated with postoperative complications and high mortality. Long-term outcomes in patients with perioperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) have recently received increased attention, especially POAF in non-thoracic surgery. PURPOSE:This study aimed to compare long-term AF related hospitalization and stroke in patients with POAF in relation to major emergency abdominal surgery and in patients with non-perioperative AF. METHODS AND RESULTS:We crosslinked data from Danish nationwide registries and identified all patients who underwent major emergency abdominal surgery (2000-2018) and were diagnosed with POAF, and patients who developed AF in a non-perioperative setting. Patients with POAF were matched in a 1:5 ratio on age, sex, year of AF diagnosis, and oral anticoagulation (OAC) status at the beginning of follow-up with patients with non-perioperative AF. From discharge, we examined adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) of stroke using multivariable Cox regression analysis. The study population comprised 1041 (out of 42 021 who underwent major emergency abdominal surgery) patients with POAF and 5205 patients with non-perioperative AF. The median age was 78 years [interquartile range: 71-84] for those initiated on OAC therapy and 78 years [interquartile range: 71-85] for those not initiated on OAC therapy. During the first year of follow up, POAF was associated with similar rates of stroke as non-perioperative AF {patients initiated on OAC: HR 0.96 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.52-1.77] and patients not initiated on OAC: HR 0.69 (95% CI 0.41-1.15)}. CONCLUSION:POAF in relation to major emergency abdominal surgery was associated with similar rates of stroke as non-perioperative AF. These results suggest that POAF not only carry an acute burden but also a long-term burden in patients undergoing major emergency abdominal surgery.

BACKGROUND:First-time detected atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with aggravated prognosis in patients admitted with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Yet, among patients surviving beyond one year after ACS, it remains unclear how the recurrence of AF within the initial year after ACS affects the risk of stroke. METHODS:With Danish nationwide data from 2000 to 2021, we identified all patients with first-time ACS who were alive one year after discharge (index date). Patients were categorized into: i) no AF; ii) first-time detected AF during ACS admission without a recurrent hospital contact with AF (transient AF); and iii) first-time detected AF during ACS admission with a subsequent recurrent hospital contact with AF (recurrent AF). From index date, two-year rates of ischemic stroke were compared using multivariable adjusted Cox regression analysis. Treatment with antithrombotic therapy was assessed as filled prescriptions between 12 and 15 months following ACS discharge. RESULTS:We included 139,137 patients surviving one year post ACS discharge: 132,944 (95.6%) without AF, 3920 (2.8%) with transient AF, and 2273 (1.6%) with recurrent AF. Compared to those without AF, the adjusted two-year hazard ratios of ischemic stroke were 1.45 (95% CI, 1.22-1.71) for patients with transient AF and 1.47 (95% CI: 1.17-1.85) for patients with recurrent AF. Prescription rates of oral anticoagulation increased over calendar time, reaching 68.3% and 78.7% for transient and recurrent AF, respectively, from 2019 to 2021. CONCLUSION:In patients surviving one year after ACS with first-time detected AF, recurrent and transient AF were associated with a similarly increased long-term rate of ischemic stroke.

Background: Little is known about long-term outcomes beyond survival following acute aortic dissection. The aim of this research was to evaluate rates of home care initiation and nursing home admission during the first year after discharge and to assess factors associated with these needs. Methods: All patients in Denmark with a first-time diagnosis of acute aortic dissection type A or B between 2006 and 2015 were identified using national registries. Patients discharged alive without nursing home or home care use before aortic dissection were included, along with age-matched and sex-matched population controls without aortic dissection (at a ratio of 1:5). Cause-specific multivariable Cox regression was used to derive adjusted hazard ratios. Results: The study population comprised 1093 patients and 5465 control individuals with a median (IQR) age of 64 (55-71) years; 70.6% were men. During their hospital stay, 2.7% of patients were registered with a first-time diagnosis of stroke, 7.1% with heart failure, and 2.2% with acute kidney failure; 5.9% of patients needed first-time dialysis. During the first year after discharge, 0.8% of patients who had had aortic dissection were admitted to a nursing home, 7.8% started home care, and 5.9% died. Among controls, these rates were 0.2%, 1.2%, and 1.2%, respectively. Patients who had had aortic dissection had significantly increased risk of initiating home care (hazard ratio, 7.47 [95% CI, 5.38-18.37]; P < .001) and of being admitted to a nursing home (hazard ratio, 4.28 [95% CI, 1.73-10.59]; P = .001). Initiation of home care and nursing home admission were related to advanced age, female sex, preexisting comorbidities, in-hospital complications, and conservative management of type A aortic dissection. Conclusion: Only a small proportion of patients who survived an aortic dissection needed home care or nursing home admission after hospital discharge.

Abstract Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with the development of heart failure (HF). However, it is unclear if postoperative AF (POAF) after noncardiac surgery differs from non-surgical AF in terms of the risk of HF. Objectives To investigate the long-term rate of incident HF in patients developing new-onset POAF after noncardiac surgery relative to patients with non-surgical nonvalvular AF (NVAF). Methods Using Danish nationwide registries, all patients aged ≥30 years who developed POAF following noncardiac, nonobstetric surgery from 1996 to 2020 were identified. These patients were matched in a 1:3 ratio by age, sex, selected comorbidities, and year of inclusion with patients with non-surgical NVAF. The primary outcome was incident HF. Secondary outcomes were HF hospitalization and all-cause mortality. Results A total of 1,846 patients with POAF were matched with 5,538 patients with non-surgical NVAF (median age: 76 years [25th-75th percentile: 67-83 years]; 53.1% females). The median follow-up was 7.6 years. Compared with patients with non-surgical NVAF, patients with POAF did not have a significantly different rate of incident HF (2.7 versus 3.0 events per 100 person-years; HR 0.89 [95% CI, 0.78-1.03]) or HF hospitalization (2.2 versus 2.4 per 100 person-years; HR 0.88 [95% CI, 0.76-1.03]), but they had a higher rate of all-cause mortality (10.0 versus 8.7 per 100 person-years; HR 1.27 [95% CI, 1.18-1.37]) (Figure 1). Conclusions Patients with new-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation did not have a significantly different rate of incident heart failure or heart failure hospitalization, but they had a higher associated rate of all-cause mortality compared to patients with non-surgical atrial fibrillation. This finding suggests that postoperative atrial fibrillation may be regarded as non-surgical atrial fibrillation in terms of the long-term risk of heart failure. This highlights the importance of increased awareness among physicians of the risk of adverse outcomes, including heart failure, in patients with postoperative atrial fibrillation after noncardiac surgery. Closer postoperative follow-up and monitoring, as well as aggressive treatment of cardiovascular risk factors, may be warranted to reduce the risk of adverse outcomes in these patients.

AimsAtrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with heart failure (HF). However, it is unclear if postoperative AF (POAF) following non-cardiac surgery differs from non-surgical AF in terms of the risk of HF. We compared the long-term rate of incident HF in patients developing new-onset POAF following non-cardiac surgery with patients who did not develop POAF following non-cardiac surgery and patients with non-surgical non-valvular AF (NVAF).Methods and resultsUsing Danish nationwide registries, all patients aged >= 30 years who developed POAF following non-cardiac surgery (1996-2020) were identified and matched in a 1:3 ratio by age, sex, surgery type (only for the surgery group), selected comorbidities, and inclusion year with patients without POAF following non-cardiac surgery and individuals with NVAF, respectively. A total of 2270 patients with POAF were matched with 6810 patients without POAF following non-cardiac surgery, and 1846 patients with POAF were matched with 5538 patients with NVAF. The median follow-up was 7.2 years. Compared with patients without POAF, those with POAF had a higher associated long-term rate of incident HF (2.6 vs. 1.2 events per 100 person-years; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 2.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.06-2.78). Compared with individuals with NVAF, patients with POAF did not have a significantly different rate of incident HF (2.7 vs. 3.0 events per 100 person-years; adjusted HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.78-1.03).ConclusionPatients with new-onset POAF following non-cardiac surgery had a higher associated long-term rate of incident HF compared to those without POAF, with no significant difference in the rate of incident HF when compared to patients with NVAF.

Aim: To examine temporal changes in incidence rates of atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF), treatment strategies, and AF readmission rates in patients <65 years. Methods: Using Danish nationwide registries, we identified patients <65 years with a first-time AF diagnosis from 2000 to 2018. The cohort was categorized according to calendar periods; 2000-2002, 2003-2006, 2007-2010, 2011-2014, and 2015-2018. In this retrospective cohort study the incidence rate (IR) of AF per 100,000 person years (PY), catheter ablation, electrical cardioversion, use of pharmacotherapy, and AF readmission, were investigated in the first year following AF diagnosis. Results: We identified 60,917 patients; 8150 (13.4%) in 2000-2002, 11,898 (19.5%) in 2003-2006, 13,560 (22.3%) in 2007-2010, 14,167 (23.3%) in 2011-2014, and 13,142 (21.6%) in 2015-2018. Apart from 2015 to 2018, a stepwise increase in the crude IR of AF was observed across calendar periods; 2000-2002: 78.7 (95% CI 77.0;80.4), 2003-2006: 86.3 (84.7;87.8), 2007-2010: 97.9 (96.3;99.6), 2011-2014: 102.3 (100.7;104.0), 2015-2018: 93.6 (92.0;95.2). Over the studied time-periods, we found a stepwise increase in the cumulative incidence of catheter ablation (1.2% to 7.6%) electrical cardioversion (2.0% to 8.7%) and treatment with oral anticoagulant therapy (OAC) (28.5% to 47.8%) within the first year of diagnosis. No temporal differences in incidence of 1-year AF readmission were identified (AF-readmissions: 2000-2002: 32.7%, 2003-2006: 31.1%, 2007-2010: 32.2%, 2011-2014: 32.1% and 2015-2018: 31.7%). Conclusion: The incidence rate of AF in patients <65 years increased from 2000 to 2018, as did the use of catheter ablation, electrical cardioversion and OAC in the first year following AF diagnosis. 1-year AF readmission incidence remained stable around 32% over the study period.

Abstract Background Major emergency abdominal surgery (e.g. ileus, perforation) is relatively common and associated with postoperative complications and mortality. Long-term management of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) associated with a secondary precipitant has recently received increased attention. It is further unknown whether the conflicting results regarding long-term outcomes in patients with new onset AF depends on surgical subtype or the arrhythmia itself. Purpose The aim of this study was to compare long-term clinical outcomes (AF related hospitalization, stroke, and mortality) in patients with perioperative new onset AF in relation to major emergency abdominal surgery and patients with non-perioperative new onset AF. Methods We crosslinked data from Danish nationwide registries and identified all patients who underwent major emergency abdominal surgery (2000-2018) and were diagnosed with new onset AF perioperatively, and patients who developed new onset AF in a non-perioperative setting. Patients with new onset perioperative AF were matched in a 1:5 ratio on age, sex and year of AF diagnosis with patients with non-perioperative new onset AF. From discharge, we examined unadjusted rates of outcomes and adjusted hazard ratios of outcomes were assessed using multivariable Cox regression analysis. Results The study population comprised 794 (out of 42,021) patients with perioperative new onset AF and 3970 patients with non-perioperative new onset AF (median age of 78 years [interquartile range: 70-83] and 57.3% women in both groups). In general, patients with new-onset perioperative AF had lower comorbid burden compared with patients with non-perioperative new onset AF. During the first month after the hospital admission, 15.0% of the patients with perioperative AF and 36.1% of the patients with new onset AF initiated oral anticoagulation therapy (after 2010, 19.7% and 41.2%, respectively). Two years after discharge, 3.9% of patients with perioperative AF and 5.8% of patients with new onset AF (p = 0.031) had had a stroke, while 32.9% and 40.1% (p = 0.002) had had a new hospitalization with AF. Cumulative incidences of stroke and AF related hospitalization are depicted in the Figure. In the multivariable models, perioperative AF was associated with a similar rate of stroke and lower rate of AF related hospitalization compared with non-perioperative new onset AF (HR 1.03, 95% confidence interval, CI: 0.54-1.96 for stroke and HR 0.68, 95% CI: 0.50-0.92 for AF related hospitalization, respectively). Conclusion Perioperative new onset atrial fibrillation in relation to major emergency abdominal surgery was associated with long-term similar rates of stroke and lower rates of AF related hospitalization compared with new onset atrial fibrillation in the non-perioperative setting. This study demonstrates a need for more knowledge about the progress of atrial fibrillation in the setting of non-cardiac surgery.Cumulative Incidence - strokeCumulative Incidence - AF_re

The prevalence and impact of perioperative atrial fibrillation (AF) during an admission for major emergency abdominal surgery are sparsely examined. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the 30-day and 1-year outcomes (AF-related hospitalization, stroke, and all-cause mortality) in patients with and without perioperative AF to their major emergency abdominal surgery. All patients without a history of AF who underwent major emergency abdominal surgery from 2000 to 2019 and discharged alive were identified using Danish nationwide registries. Patients with and without perioperative AF (defined as new-onset AF during the index hospitalization) were matched 1:4 on age, gender, year of surgery, and type of surgery. The cumulative incidences and hazard ratios of outcomes were assessed using a multivariable Cox regression analysis comparing patients with and without perioperative AF. A total of 2% of patients were diagnosed with perioperative AF. The matched cohort comprised 792 and 3,168 patients with and without perioperative AF, respectively (median age 78 years [twenty-fifth to seventy-fifth percentile 70 to 83 years]; 43% men). Cumulative incidences of AF-related hospitalizations, stroke, and mortality 1 year after discharge were 30% versus 3.4%, 3.4% versus 2.7%, and 35% ver-sus 22% in patients with and without perioperative AF, respectively. The 30-day outcomes were similarly elevated among patients with perioperative AF. Perioperative AF during an admission for major emergency abdominal surgery was associated with higher 30-day and 1-year rates of AF-related hospitalization and mortality and similar rates of stroke. These findings suggest that perioperative AF is a prognostic marker of increased morbidity and mortality in relation to major emergency abdominal surgery and warrants further investigation. (c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) (Am J Cardiol 2023;207:59-68)

Aims Describe and compare incidences across age groups of rehospitalization, repeated aortic surgery, and death in patients who survived surgery and hospitalization for type A aortic dissection. Methods and results From Danish nationwide registries, we identified patients hospitalized with Stanford type A aortic dissections (2006-2018). Survivors of hospitalization and surgery on the ascending aorta and/or aortic arch comprised the study population (n = 606, 36 (38.9%) <60 years old (group I), 194 (32.0%) 60-69 years old (group II), and 176 (29.1%) >69 years old (group III)). During the first year, 62.5% were re-hospitalized and 1.4% underwent repeated aortic surgery with no significant differences across age groups (P = 0.68 and P = 0.39, respectively). Further, 5.9% died (group I: 3.0%, group II: 8.3%, group III: 7.4%, P = 0.04). After 10 years, 8.0% had undergone repeated aortic surgery (group I: 11.5%, group II: 8.5%, group III: 1.6%, P = 0.04) and 10.2% (group I), 17.0% (group II), and 22.2% (group III) had died (P = 0.01). Using multivariable Cox regression analysis, we described long-term outcomes comparing age groups. No age differences were found in one-year outcomes, while age > 69 years compared with age < 60 years was associated with a lower rate of repeated aortic surgery [hazard ratio 0.17, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.04-0.78] and a higher rate of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 2.44, 95% CI 1.37-4.34) in the 10-year analyses. Conclusion Rehospitalisations in the first year after discharge were common in all age groups, but survival was high. Repeated aortic surgery was significantly more common among younger than older patients.

BACKGROUND:We aimed to describe characteristics and outcomes in a nationwide population of patients with acute type A and type B aortic dissection.METHODS:All patients in Denmark with a first-time diagnosis of acute aortic dissection between 2006 and 2015 were identified by national registries. The main outcomes were in-hospital mortality and long-term survival in hospital survivors.RESULTS:The study population comprised 1157 (68%) patients with type A aortic dissection and 556 (32%) patients with type B aortic dissection, median age of 66 (57-74) years and 70 (61-79) years, respectively. Men accounted for 64%. Median follow-up was 8.9 (6.8-11.5) years. Of patients with type A aortic dissection, 74% were managed surgically, whereas 22% of the patients with type B aortic dissection were managed with surgery or endovascular technique. In-hospital mortality was 27% for type A aortic dissection overall (surgery, 18%; no surgery, 52%) and 16% for type B aortic dissection (surgery or endovascular treatment, 13%; conservative treatment, 17%; P < .001, type A vs type B). Of patients discharged alive, survival was persistently better for type A aortic dissection than for type B aortic dissection (P < .001). Unadjusted 1- and 3-year survival of patients with type A aortic dissection discharged alive was 96% and 91%, respectively, for surgically managed and 88% and 78% without surgery. For type B aortic dissection, the numbers were 89% and 83% for endovascular/surgically managed and 89% and 77% for conservatively managed.CONCLUSIONS:We found higher in-hospital mortality for type A and type B aortic dissection than is reported from referral center registries. Type A aortic dissection had the highest mortality rate during the acute phase, whereas for patients who were discharged alive, the mortality rate was higher for patients with type B aortic dissection.

Abstract Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) in relation to surgery remains a clinical challenge. Major emergency abdominal surgery (e.g. ileus, perforation) is associated with postoperative complications and mortality. However, the prevalence and impact of perioperative AF in this setting is not well examined. Purpose We compared 30-days and 1-year outcomes (i.e. hospitalization of any causes, AF-related hospitalization, thromboembolic events and all-cause mortality) in patients who did and did not develop perioperative AF (POAF) in relation to their major emergency abdominal surgery. Methods We crosslinked data from Danish nationwide registries and identified all patients who underwent major emergency abdominal surgery (2000–2018) and discharged alive. Patients who developed POAF during hospitalization were matched in a 1:3 ratio on age, sex, year of surgery and category of surgery with those without POAF. Starting follow up at discharge, we examined the rates of outcomes at 30-days and 1-year post-discharge. The cumulative incidences and ratios of outcomes were assessed with the Aalen Johanson estimator together with Kaplan-Meier estimator and multivariable Cox regression analysis, respectively. Results We identified 891 patients with POAF and 64,914 patients without POAF. The matched cohort were composed of 889 patients with POAF and 2667 patients without POAF with a median age of 79 years [25th-75th percentile; 72–84 years] and 45.2% males. In general, patients with POAF had higher comorbid burden compared with patients without POAF. The cumulative incidences of a hospitalization of any cause after 30-days post-discharge were 31.2% and 22.3% in patients with and without POAF, respectively. The corresponding numbers for AF-related hospitalization were 20.8% and 1.2%, respectively. In adjusted analyses, POAF was associated with a significantly higher risk of hospitalization of any causes together with AF-related hospitalization (Figure 1 and 2). The cumulative incidences of a thromboembolic event after 30-days post-discharge were 2.2% and 0.9% in patients with and without POAF, respectively. The corresponding numbers for all-cause mortality were 9.7% and 3.2%, respectively. In adjusted analyses, POAF was associated with a significantly higher risk of a thromboembolic event together with all-cause mortality within 30-days of follow up as well as 1-year of follow up. However, the results regarding thromboembolic events did not reach statistical significance after 1-year of follow up (Figure 1 and 2). Conclusions Perioperative atrial fibrillation in relation to major emergency abdominal surgery was associated with higher 30-days and 1-year rates of hospitalizations of any causes, atrial fibrillation related hospitalization, a thromboembolic event and all-cause mortality. These findings suggest that perioperative atrial fibrillation is a strong prognostic marker of increased morbidity following major emergency abdominal surgery. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

Background Oral anticoagulation (OAC) is effective for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. However, some patients experience stroke despite OAC therapy, and knowledge about the impact of prior treatment quality is lacking. Methods and Results Patients with atrial fibrillation on OAC therapy who had a first-time ischemic stroke were identified in the Danish Stroke Registry (2005-2018). Patients treated with vitamin K antagonist (VKA) therapy were compared according to the international normalized ratio just before stroke (international normalized ratio <2 [subtherapeutic], international normalized ratio 2-3 [therapeutic], international normalized ratio >3 [supratherapeutic]), and patients on underdosed, appropriately dosed, and overdosed direct OAC (DOAC) therapy were compared. Stroke severity was determined using the Scandinavia Stroke Scale (0-58 points), and the risk of very severe stroke (0-14 points) was analyzed by multivariable logistic regression. One-year mortality was determined using multivariable Cox regression. A total of 2319 patients with atrial fibrillation and stroke were included; 1196 were taking a VKA (subtherapeutic [46%], therapeutic [43%], supratherapeutic [11%]), and 1123 were taking DOAC (underdosed [23%], appropriately dosed [60%], and overdosed [17%]). Subtherapeutic and supratherapeutic VKA therapy (compared with therapeutic) and underdosed DOAC therapy (compared with appropriate and underdosed DOAC) patients were older, more often women, and more comorbid. Subtherapeutic VKA therapy was associated with very severe stroke (odds ratio [OR], 2.06 [95% CI, 1.28-3.31]), whereas supratherapeutic VKA therapy was not (OR, 1.24 [95% CI, 0.60-2.57]) compared with therapeutic VKA therapy. Patients on subtherapeutic and supratherapeutic VKA therapy had a higher 1-year mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.66 [95% CI, 1.29-2.13]); HR, 1.55 [95% CI, 1.08-2.22], respectively) than those on therapeutic VKA therapy. Treatment with underdosed or overdosed DOAC therapy was not associated with very severe stroke (OR, 1.27 [95% CI, 0.76-2.15]; OR, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.37-1.43], respectively) and was not associated with 1-year mortality (HR, 1.09 [95% CI, 0.83-1.44]; HR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.57-1.18], respectively) than appropriate DOAC. Conclusions Half of the patients with atrial fibrillation with stroke were on inappropriate OAC therapy. Subtherapeutic VKA was associated with worse stroke severity and higher mortality rate than therapeutic VKA therapy. Neither underdosed nor overdosed DOAC was associated with worse outcomes in adjusted models compared with appropriately dosed DOAC. This study supports DOAC as a first-line therapy over VKA.

Abstract Background All patients with type A aortic dissections, regardless of age, are recommended urgent aortic surgery. However, studies exploring long term outcomes in survivors are sparse, and especially, the significance of age on long-term outcomes remain unclear. Purpose We described and compared incidences across age groups of post-discharge readmission, repeated aortic surgery, and death in patients who survived surgery and hospitalization for type A aortic dissection. Methods Using data from Danish nationwide registries, we identified patients hospitalized with Stanford type A aortic dissections from 2006–2018. Survivors of hospitalization and surgery on the ascending aorta and/or aortic arch comprised the study population (Figure 1). Using cumulative incidence plots taking death into account as a competing risk and Cox regression analysis, we described long-term outcomes (rehospitalizations, repeated aortic surgery, and death) and compared different age groups. The diagnosis of type A aortic dissection in the registries used, was validated from 191 clinical records to have a positive predictive value of 94.8%. Results Of 606 initial survivors of surgery and hospitalization with type A aortic dissection, 236 (38.9%) were <60 years old (group I), 194 (32.0%) were 60–69 years old (group II), and 176 (29.1%) were >69 years old (group III). Figure 2 shows cumulative incidences of outcomes according to age. During the first year, 62.5% were re-hospitalized (median number of days hospitalized was 2 days (IQR 1–8 days) and 1.4% underwent repeated aortic surgery with no significant differences across age groups (P=0.68 and P=0.39, respectively). Further, 5.9% died (group I: 3.0%, group II: 8.3%, group III: 7.4%, P=0.04). After 10 years of follow up, 8.0% had undergone repeated aortic surgery (group I: 11.5%, group II: 8.5%, group III: 1.6%, P=0.04) and 10.2% (group I), 17.0% (group II), and 22.2% (group III) had died (P=0.01). In adjusted analyses, no age differences were found in one-year outcomes, while age >69 years (group III) compared with age <60 years (group I) was associated with a lower rate of repeated aortic surgery (hazard ratio 0.17, 95% confidence interval 0.04–0.78) and a higher rate of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 2.44, 95% confidence interval 1.37–4.34) in the 10-years analysis. Conclusion Among survivors of type A aortic dissections, rehospitalizations the first year after discharge were common among all age groups, but survival was high. Repeated aortic surgery was rare, and significantly more common among younger than older patients. Evaluations of quality of life in survivors of type A aortic dissections are needed. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

Abstract Background/Introduction The general atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF) population is well explored and described, but there is sparse data on temporal changes in the incidence, AF-readmission rates, and practice patterns in patients with AF under 65 years of age from unselected cohorts. Purpose To investigate temporal changes, AF readmission rates, and practice patterns in patients under 65 years of age with first-time AF diagnosed between 2000–2018. Methods Using Danish nationwide registries, we identified patients >18 years and <65 years with a first-time AF-diagnosis from 2000–2018. The cohort was categorized according to calendar periods; 2000–2002, 2003–2006, 2007–2010, 2011–2014 and 2015–2018. Incidence rate (IR) of AF per 100,000 person years (PY), AF-readmission, and practice patterns of medical treatment, electrical cardioversion, and catheter ablation was investigated in the first year following AF-diagnosis. Results In this study 60,917 patients were included; 8,150 patients (13.4%) in 2000–2002, 11,898 (19.5%) in 2003–2006, 13,560 (22.3%) in 2007–2010, 14,167 (23.3%) in 2011–2014 and 13,142 (21.6%) in 2015–2018. No major differences were seen in patient characteristics according to calendar period. A stepwise increase, as seen in the Table, in the crude IR of AF per 100,000 PY was observed across calendar periods, except for 2015–2018 (Crude IR [95% CI]: 2000–2002: 78.7 [77.0; 80.4], 2003–2006: 86.3 [84.7; 87.8], 2007–2010: 97.9 [96.3; 99.6], 2011–2014: 102.3 [100.7; 104.0], 2015–2018: 93.6 [92.0; 95.2], while no difference in AF readmission was identified (AF-readmissions: 2000–2002: 32.7%, 2003–2006: 31.1%, 2007–2010: 32.2%, 2011–2014: 32.1% and 2015–2018: 31.7%), as seen in the Figure, right panel. In the first year following AF-diagnosis, the cumulative incidence of catheter ablation increased stepwise from 1.2% in 2000–2002 to 7.6% in 2015–2018 and electrical cardioversion from 2.0% in 2000–2002 to 8.7% in 2015–2018 (Figure, left panel). Treatment with oral anticoagulant therapy (OAC) increased from 28.5% in 2000–2002 to 47.8% in 2015–2018, while there was no change in treatment with rhythm or rate medication therapy. Conclusion From 2000–2018, we found an increase in the incidence of atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF) in patients <65 years from 78.7/100,000 person years (PY) to 93.6/100,000 PY and an increase in the use of catheter ablation, electrical cardioversion and OAC in the first year following first-time AF-diagnosis. AF readmission rates were stable over calendar periods. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

Abstract Background First-time detected atrial fibrillation (AF) during acute coronary syndrome (ACS) aggravates the prognosis and increases the risk of ischemic stroke. In this setting, AF may present as brief and transient or with recurrent episodes after discharge. However, data on the association between transient or recurrent AF and ischemic stroke in patients with ACS are sparse. Further, despite being associated with ischemic stroke, first-time detected AF patients have been reported with low oral anticoagulation (OAC) rates. Purpose To examine the associated rate of ischemic stroke and mortality in ACS survivors with transient or recurrent AF and to assess the antithrombotic practice patterns one year after ACS. Methods Using data from Danish nationwide registries, we identified all patients with first-time ACS, without known AF prior to ACS, from 2000–2017 who were alive one year after ACS discharge (index date). According to a grace period between ACS discharge and one year after ACS discharge, patients were categorized into: i) no AF; ii) first-time detected AF during ACS admission without AF recurrence (transient AF); and iii) first-time detected AF during ACS admission with a subsequent recurrent AF episode (recurrent AF). Patients who developed AF during the grace period were excluded. Patients were followed from one year post ACS discharge, and two-year rates of ischemic stroke and mortality were compared using multivariable adjusted Cox proportional hazards analysis. Further, we assessed the prescribed OAC rates in a three-month period following the index date. Results We included 116,793 patients surviving one year post ACS discharge: 111,708 (95.6%) without AF (64.9% male, median age 64 years), 2,671 (2.3%) with transient AF (58.0% male, median age 74 years), and 2,414 (2.1%) with recurrent AF (55.2% male, median age 76 years). The cumulative two-year incidence of ischemic stroke was 0.9%, 1.5%, and 2.3% for patients without AF, transient AF, and recurrent AF, respectively (Figure 1). The cumulative two-year incidence of mortality was 7.4%, 12.1%, and 20.3% for patients without AF, transient AF, and recurrent AF, respectively (Figure 1). Compared to those without AF, the adjusted two-year rates of outcomes were as follows: ischemic stroke: HR 1.15 (95% CI: 0.81–1.61) for patients with transient AF and HR 1.50 (95% CI: 1.14–1.98) for patients with recurrent AF; mortality: HR 0.98 (95% CI: 0.87–1.10) for patients with transient AF and HR 1.35 (95% CI: 1.23–1.49) for patients with recurrent AF (Figure). We identified that 20.9% for transient AF and 42.2% for recurrent AF were prescribed OAC therapy in the three-month period after one year. Conclusion In patients surviving one year after ACS with first-time detected AF, a recurrent AF episode was associated with an increased long-term rate of ischemic stroke and mortality, while transient AF yielded no statistically difference as compared with patients without AF. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

AIMS The aim of this study was to examine contemporary data on the 1-year prognosis of patients surviving acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and concomitant first-time detected atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS AND RESULTS Using Danish nationwide registries, we identified all patients surviving a first-time admission with ACS from 2000 to 2018 and grouped them into (i) those without AF prior to or during ACS; (ii) those with a history of AF; and (iii) those with first-time detected AF during admission with ACS. With 1 year of follow-up, rates of ischaemic stroke, death, and bleeding were compared between study groups using multivariable adjusted Cox proportional hazards analysis. We included 161 266 ACS survivors: 135 878 (84.2%) without AF, 18 961 (11.8%) with history of AF, and 6427 (4.0%) with first-time detected AF at admission with ACS. Compared to those without AF, the adjusted 1-year rates of outcomes were as follows: ischaemic stroke [hazard ratio (HR) 1.38 (95% CI 1.22-1.56) for patients with history of AF and HR 1.67 (95% CI 1.38-2.01) for patients with first-time detected AF]; mortality [HR 1.25 (95% CI 1.21-1.31) for patients with history of AF and HR 1.52 (95% CI 1.43-1.62) for patients with first-time detected AF]; and bleeding [HR 1.22 (95% CI 1.14-1.30) for patients with history of AF and HR 1.28 (95% CI 1.15-1.43) for patients with first-time detected AF]. CONCLUSION In patients with ACS, first-time detected AF appeared to be at least as strongly associated with the 1-year rates of ischaemic stroke, mortality, and bleeding as compared with patients with a history of AF.

Background and purposeClinical use of continuous electrocardiography (cECG) for detecting atrial fibrillation (AF) after stroke is unclear. In a Danish nationwide cohort, we described post‐stroke time trends in outpatient cECG usage and AF incidence and characterized factors associated with cECG use.MethodsPatients without AF discharged after their first ischaemic stroke between 2010 and 2016 were identified from Danish nationwide registries. cECG included Holter or event recording within 120 days from discharge. Cumulative incidence analysis and multivariable adjusted logistic regression were used to assess time trends and factors associated with cECG usage and AF.ResultsThe study population comprised 39 641 patients. Cumulative use of cECG increased threefold from 3.3% [95% confidence intervals (CI), 2.8–3.8] in 2010 to 10.5% (95% CI, 9.7–11.3) in 2016. Correspondingly, cumulative incidence of post‐stroke AF increased from 1.9% (95% CI, 1.5–2.3) to 2.8% (95% CI, 2.4–3.2). Of all cECG‐evaluated patients, 6.3% received an AF diagnosis versus 2.2% of the unevaluated. Receiving cECG was associated with increased odds of AF (odds ratio, 3.4; 95% CI, 2.8–4.0). Lower age, milder strokes and less comorbidity were associated with increased odds of receiving cECG. In contrast, risk factors for AF were increasing age and more comorbidity.ConclusionsPost‐stroke outpatient cECG use and AF incidence have increased over time, but screening rates were low. cECG use was associated with tripled odds of detecting AF. There was a disparity between factors associated with cECG use and risk factors of AF. This raise questions as to the appropriateness of the current clinical approach to post‐stoke AF detection.

AIMSThromboprophylaxis guidelines for patients with concurrent atrial fibrillation (AF) during infections are unclear and not supported by data. We compared 1-year outcomes in patients with infection-related AF and infection without AF.METHODS AND RESULTSBy crosslinking Danish nationwide registry data, AF naïve patients admitted with infection (1996-2016) were identified. Those with AF during the infection (infection-related AF) were matched 1:3 according to age, sex, type of infection, and year with patients with infection without AF. Outcomes (AF, thromboembolic events) were assessed by multivariable Cox regression. The study population comprised 30 307 patients with infection-related AF and 90 912 patients with infection without AF [median age 79 years (interquartile range 71-86), 47.6% males in both groups]. The 1-year absolute risk of AF and thromboembolic events were 36.4% and 7.6%, respectively (infection-related AF) and 1.9% and 4.4%, respectively (infection without AF). In the multivariable analyses, infection-related AF was associated with an increased long-term risk of AF and thromboembolic events compared with infection without AF: hazard ratio (HR) 25.98, 95% confidence interval (CI) 24.64-27.39 for AF and HR 2.10, 95% CI 1.98-2.22 for thromboembolic events. Further, differences in risks existed across different subtypes of infections.CONCLUSIONDuring the first year after discharge, 36% of patients with infection-related AF had a new hospital contact with AF. Infection-related AF was associated with increased risk of thromboembolic events compared with infection without AF and our results suggest that AF related to infection may merit treatment and follow-up similar to that of AF not related to infection.

ObjectivesWe compared long-term outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) with and without a secondary precipitant.Design and settingRetrospective cohort study based on Danish nationwide registries.ParticipantsPatients with AF with and without secondary precipitants (1996–2015) were matched 1:1 according to age, sex, calendar year, CHA2DS2-VASc score and oral anticoagulation therapy (OAC), resulting in a cohort of 39 723 patients with AF with a secondary precipitant and the same number of patients with AF without a secondary precipitant. Secondary precipitants included alcohol intoxication, thyrotoxicosis, myocardial infarction, surgery and infection in conjunction with AF.Primary and secondary outcomesThe primary outcome in this study was thromboembolic events. Secondary outcomes included AF rehospitalisation and death. Long-term risks of outcomes were examined by multivariable Cox regression analysis.ResultsThe most common precipitants were infection (55.0%), surgery (13.2%) and myocardial infarction (12.0%). The 5-year absolute risk of thromboembolic events (taking death into account as a competing risk) in patients with AF grouped according to secondary precipitants were 8.3% (alcohol intoxication), 8.5% (thyrotoxicosis), 12.1% (myocardial infarction), 11.6% (surgery), 12.2% (infection), 10.1% (>1 precipitant) and 12.3% (no secondary precipitant). In the multivariable analyses, AF with a secondary precipitant was associated with the same or an even higher thromboembolic risk than AF without a secondary precipitant. One exception was patients with AF and thyrotoxicosis: those not initiated on OAC therapy carried a lower thromboembolic risk the first year of follow-up than matched patients with AF without a secondary precipitant and no OAC therapy.ConclusionsIn general, AF with a secondary precipitant was associated with the same thromboembolic risk as AF without a secondary precipitant. Consequently, this study highlights the need for more research regarding the long-term management of patients with AF associated with a secondary precipitant.