BACKGROUND:Seladelpar is a potent and selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-δ agonist that targets multiple cell types involved in primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), leading to anti-cholestatic, anti-inflammatory and anti-pruritic effects. AIMS:To evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of seladelpar in patients with PBC. METHODS:In an open-label, international, long-term extension study, patients with PBC completing seladelpar lead-in studies continued treatment. Seladelpar was taken orally once daily at doses of 5 or 10 mg with dose adjustment permitted for safety or tolerability. The primary analysis was for safety and the secondary efficacy analysis examined biochemical markers of cholestasis and liver injury. The study was terminated early due to the unexpected histological findings in a concurrent study for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, which were subsequently found to predate treatment. Safety and efficacy data were analysed through 2 years. RESULTS:There were no serious treatment-related adverse events observed among 106 patients treated with seladelpar for up to 2 years. There were four discontinuations for safety, one possibly related to seladelpar. Among 53 patients who completed 2 years of seladelpar, response rates increased from years 1 to 2 for the composite endpoint (alkaline phosphatase [ALP] <1.67 × ULN, ≥15% decrease in ALP, and total bilirubin ≤ULN) and ALP normalisation from 66% to 79% and from 26% to 42%, respectively. In those with elevated bilirubin at baseline, 43% achieved normalisation at year 2. CONCLUSIONS:Seladelpar was safe, and markedly improved biochemical markers of cholestasis and liver injury in patients with PBC. These effects were maintained or improved throughout the second year. CLINICALTRIALS:gov: NCT03301506; Clinicaltrialsregister.eu: 2017-003910-16.

A fixed-dose combination of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) plus weight-based ribavirin (RBV) for 12 weeks is recommended for the treatment of patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV)-associated decompensated cirrhosis. However, large global studies, while confirming the effectiveness of SOF/VEL in a broad range of patients, often exclude these patients. This Phase 2, single-arm, open-label study in adult patients with HCV-associated decompensated cirrhosis in France and the USA aimed to provide further data on the safety and efficacy of SOF/VEL plus RBV for 12 weeks in this population. Patients were treated with a fixed-dose combination of SOF 400 mg/VEL 100 mg plus weight-based RBV once daily for 12 weeks. The inclusion criteria were chronic HCV infection (≥6 months), quantifiable HCV RNA at screening, Child–Turcotte–Pugh class B or C cirrhosis, and liver imaging within 6 months of Day 1 to exclude hepatocellular carcinoma. Among 32 patients who initiated treatment, 78.1% achieved sustained virologic response 12 weeks after the end of treatment (SVR12). Failure to achieve SVR12 was due to non-virologic reasons (investigator discretion, n = 1; death, n = 6). All 25 patients in the per-protocol population achieved SVR12 and all but one achieved sustained virologic response 24 weeks after the end of treatment. Adverse events (AEs) were as expected for a patient population with advanced liver disease. All Grade 3–4 and serious AEs and deaths were deemed unrelated to treatment. In patients with HCV-associated decompensated cirrhosis, SOF/VEL plus RBV achieved high SVR12 rates and was generally well tolerated.

BACKGROUND:Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is characterised by hepatic steatosis, inflammation, and injury, and is associated with an increased risk of liver transplantation and death. NASH affects more than 16 million people in the USA, and there is no approved therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of aldafermin, an engineered analogue of the gut hormone fibroblast growth factor 19 (FGF19). METHODS:In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b study (ALPINE 2/3) in patients with biopsy-confirmed NASH and stage 2 or 3 fibrosis, we randomly assigned patients stratified by fibrosis stage in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive placebo, aldafermin 0·3 mg, 1·0 mg, or 3·0 mg once daily for 24 weeks at 30 study sites in the USA. Patients, investigators, the funder, and all other staff, were masked to treatment assignment throughout the study. The primary endpoint was an improvement in liver fibrosis of at least one stage with no worsening of NASH at week 24. Analyses were done by intention-to-treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03912532, and has been completed. FINDINGS:Between May 16, 2019, and Sept 4, 2020, 786 patients were screened, of whom 171 were randomly assigned to a treatment group and included in the intention-to-treat population: 43 in the 0·3 mg aldafermin group, 42 in the 1·0 mg group, 43 in the 3·0 mg group, and 43 in the placebo group. In total, 145 (85%) of patients completed treatment. At week 24, among patients with biopsies at both baseline and week 24, was seven (19%) of 36 patients in the placebo group, 11 (31%) of 36 in the 0·3 mg aldafermin group (difference 90% CI 12% [-9 to 33]; p=0·11), five (15%) of 34 patients in the 1·0 mg group (difference -5% [-24 to 13]; p=0·80), and 11 (30%) of 37 patients in the 3·0 mg group (difference 10% [-9 to 30]; p=0·12) had an improvement in liver fibrosis of at least one stage with no worsening of NASH, without meeting the prespecified significance for dose response (p=0·55). Adverse events were mostly mild or moderate in severity. Diarrhoea occurred in six (14%) of 43 patients in the placebo group, three (7%) of 43 patients in the 0·3 mg aldafermin group, five (12%) of 41 patients in the 1·0 mg group, and ten (23%) of 43 patients in the 3·0 mg group. Incidences of serious adverse events and discontinuations owing to adverse events were similar between groups. INTERPRETATION:Aldafermin was generally well tolerated but did not produce a significant dose response on fibrosis improvement of at least one stage with no worsening of NASH, despite positive effects on a number of secondary endpoints. The findings of this trial may have implications for the design of future NASH trials. FUNDING:NGM Biopharmaceuticals.

Conclusion:As fibrosis stage is becoming the main predictor of NAFLD progression, patients' knowledge of their fibrosis stage should become a priority to improve liver health.Given the seriousness of NASH-related morbidity and mortality, improving patient-provider communication, especially for people with obesity, about liver fibrosis stage, its associated risks, and how to mitigate them, is essential.Training healthcare professionals and promoting patient educational programs to support behavior changes should also be included in the liver health agenda.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS:Advanced fibrosis attributable to NASH is a leading cause of end-stage liver disease.APPROACH AND RESULTS:In this phase 2b trial, 392 patients with bridging fibrosis or compensated cirrhosis (F3-F4) were randomized to receive placebo, selonsertib 18 mg, cilofexor 30 mg, or firsocostat 20 mg, alone or in two-drug combinations, once-daily for 48 weeks. The primary endpoint was a ≥1-stage improvement in fibrosis without worsening of NASH between baseline and 48 weeks based on central pathologist review. Exploratory endpoints included changes in NAFLD Activity Score (NAS), liver histology assessed using a machine learning (ML) approach, liver biochemistry, and noninvasive markers. The majority had cirrhosis (56%) and NAS ≥5 (83%). The primary endpoint was achieved in 11% of placebo-treated patients versus cilofexor/firsocostat (21%; P = 0.17), cilofexor/selonsertib (19%; P = 0.26), firsocostat/selonsertib (15%; P = 0.62), firsocostat (12%; P = 0.94), and cilofexor (12%; P = 0.96). Changes in hepatic collagen by morphometry were not significant, but cilofexor/firsocostat led to a significant decrease in ML NASH CRN fibrosis score (P = 0.040) and a shift in biopsy area from F3-F4 to ≤F2 fibrosis patterns. Compared to placebo, significantly higher proportions of cilofexor/firsocostat patients had a ≥2-point NAS reduction; reductions in steatosis, lobular inflammation, and ballooning; and significant improvements in alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), bilirubin, bile acids, cytokeratin-18, insulin, estimated glomerular filtration rate, ELF score, and liver stiffness by transient elastography (all P ≤ 0.05). Pruritus occurred in 20%-29% of cilofexor versus 15% of placebo-treated patients.CONCLUSIONS:In patients with bridging fibrosis and cirrhosis, 48 weeks of cilofexor/firsocostat was well tolerated, led to improvements in NASH activity, and may have an antifibrotic effect. This combination offers potential for fibrosis regression with longer-term therapy in patients with advanced fibrosis attributable to NASH.

Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), the clinically aggressive variant of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, is characterized by hepatocellular injury and inflammation.1 Patients with NASH are at higher risk of progression to cirrhosis and it is therefore targeted for drug development efforts.2 Lifestyle modifications and weight loss are the only recommended modalities and no drug is yet approved for the treatment of patients with NASH. Saroglitazar is a dual PPAR α/γ agonist, which has shown promise for treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.3 Because of its combined PPAR-α/γ agonism, it has a clinically favorable impact of glucose and lipid metabolism. Saroglitazar has shown to improve liver-related histology in patients with NASH and was recently approved for treatment of NASH in India.4 The current study builds on the published literature in this proof of concept study to determine if there is a signal for histologic improvement of NASH with saroglitazar in a Western population.

Background and aims: Early liver transplantation (eLT) for severe alcoholic hepatitis (SAH) is an emerging therapy that must be evaluated in prospective controlled studies with a rigorous study design to bring reliable data to experts.Method: this prospective controlled trial (NCT01756794) compared 3 groups: A: patients with SAH not responding to medical treatment selected for eLT using a dedicated score (≥220/250), based on social and addiction parameters; B: patients candidates for transplantation for alcohol-related cirrhosis with at least 6 months of abstinence; C: patients with SAH not responding to medical treatment denied for eLT (score <220).Primary analysis was restricted to transplanted patients, to assess the non-inferiority of A versus B on 2-year alcohol relapse after LT using the alcohol timeline follow back (ATLFB) method and a pre-specified margin of 10%.Secondary outcomes were pattern of alcohol relapse and survival after LT.A secondary analysis was restricted to all patients of groups A and C to assess the benefit of eLT in SAH on 2-year survival.Results: We included 155 patients with SAH: 78 selected for eLT (group A, median Lille score = 0.86), 77 denied for eLT (group C, median Lille score = 0.81).129 patients were included in group B. Primary analysis: 68 (A) and 93 patients (B) were transplanted and included.MELD score at inclusion in groups A and B were 30.6 vs. 22.3, p < 0.001.The non-inferiority of A versus B was not demonstrated with a 2-year alcohol relapse of 33.8 (A) and 24.7% (B, figure), absolute difference of 9.1, one-sided 95% confidence interval, -∞ to 21.1%.Regarding secondary outcomes, 2-year heaving drinking relapse rate was higher in group A (22.1 vs. 5.4%, p < 0.001).In heavy drinking relapsers, median percentage of time spent to drink during the follow-up was 10 (A) vs. 5.9% (B).Two-year survival in groups A and B was similar (89.7 vs. 88.1%).Secondary analysis: 2year survival was higher in group A ( patients transplanted or not, n = 78) than in group C (n = 77): 82.8 vs. 28.2%,p < 0.001. Conclusion:In the first controlled study in this field, relapse rate is of 33.8% in patients early transplanted for SAH as compared to 24.7% in patients with alcohol-related cirrhosis.Using a pre-specified noninferiority margin of 10%, we cannot conclude to non-inferiority.Heavy drinking is more frequently seen after eLT.Early liver transplantation induces a drastic improvement of survival in patients with SAH not responding to medical therapy.