Supplementary Figure S1 supports Figure 1 and shows stromal NGF expression and innervation in human colorectal cancer tissues. Supplementary Figure S2 supports Figure 1 and shows stromal NGF expression and innervation in mouse colorectal cancer tissues. Supplementary Figure S3 supports Figure 2 and shows that adrenergic stimulation induces fibroblast NGF upregulation via the β2-adrenergic receptor to promote innervation. Supplementary Figure S4 supports Figure 3 and shows that adrenergic stimulation increases mouse colon cancer organoid growth through ADRA2/Gi protein-mediated activation of YAP signaling. Supplementary Figure S5 supports Figure 3 and shows that adrenergic stimulation increases human colon cancer cell growth through ADRA2/Gi protein-mediated activation of YAP signaling. Supplementary Figure S6 supports Figure 3 and shows that chemical sympathectomy inhibits colon cancer growth and YAP activation. Supplementary Figure S7 supports Figure 4 and shows that stromal NGF increases innervation and colon cancer cell proliferation. Supplementary Figure S8 supports Figure 5 and shows that NGF increases colon cancer cell growth and stem-related gene expression. Supplementary Figure S9 supports Figure 6 and shows that Trk blockade decreases innervation, cancer cell proliferation, and Ngf expression. Supplementary Figure S10 supports Figure 7 and shows that high NGF expression is associated with poor patient outcomes, stroma-rich tumor subtypes, and enrichment for YAP and AKT pathways.
Supplementary Table S1: List of differentially expressed genes in RNA-seq from norepinephrine- or vehicle-treated AKP tumor organoids. Supplementary Table S2: Gene set enrichment analyses using RNA-seq data from norepinephrine- or vehicle-treated AKP tumor organoids.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Loss of the tumor suppressor gene Apc in Lgr5+ intestinal stem cells results in aberrant Wnt signaling and colonic tumorigenesis. In the setting of injury, however, we and others have also shown that non-stem cells can give rise to colonic tumors. The mechanism by which inflammation leads to cellular plasticity and cancer, however, remains largely unknown. METHODS: RNA expression analysis of Wnt, COX, and Akt signaling was assessed in patients with quiescent or active ulcerative colitis (UC) and patients with UC-associated neoplasia using available datasets. The role of COX signaling in colonic tumorigenesis was examined using epithelial and doublecortinlike kinase 1 (Dclk1)+ cell-specific conditional COX-1 knockout mice and pharmacologic treatment with different nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. RESULTS: In this study, we show that prostaglandins and phospho-Akt are key inflammatory mediators that promote stemness in Apc mutant Dclk1+ cells that give rise to colorectal cancer. Moreover, prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and Akt are increased in colitis in both mice and humans, leading to inflammation-associated dysplasia upon activation of Wnt signaling. Importantly, inhibition of epithelial-derived COX-1 by aspirin or conditional knockout in Dclk1+ cells reduced PGE2 levels and prevented the development of inflammation-associated colorectal cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Our data shows that epithelial and Dclk1+ cell-derived COX-1 plays an important role in inflammation-associated tumorigenesis. Importantly, low-dose aspirin was effective in chemo-prevention through inhibition of COX-1 that reduced colitis-associated cancer. (Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol 2025;19:101469; https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jcmgh.2025.101469)
Peritoneal carcinomatosis from gastrointestinal tumours is considered a poor prognostic factor, with a median overall survival of six to nine months in the absence of intervention. The advent of patient-derived organoid cultures (PDOs) has provided a breakthrough in personalised medicine, allowing researchers and clinicians to model the complexity and heterogeneity of individual tumours in vitro. PDOs hold great promise in this field, as variations in the management of peritoneal carcinomatosis due to differences in the method of delivery of chemotherapeutics, drug selection, exposure duration, and tumour pathology make it impractical to use a single, standardised treatment regimen. We aim to summarise the methodologies and limitations of studies encapsulating organoids derived from peritoneal metastases to encourage design considerations that may improve future clinical relevance, standardise protocols, and address translational challenges in personalising treatment strategies.
Living bacteria can serve as biosensors for the detection of DNA in vitro and in vivo, capitalizing on their inherent ability to take up and process foreign DNA. Such bactosensors can be engineered to analyse environmental DNA, down to the single-base level, from unprocessed samples, and provide a detectable output, such as fluorescence, antibiotic resistance or therapeutic release. In this Review, we first outline design strategies for bactosensors, including genetic toolkits, such as clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)–CRISPR-associated (Cas) systems, and applications in biomedicine, agriculture, and food and water safety. Moreover, we examine chassis species, DNA uptake mechanisms, signal transduction and output strategies for bacterial biosensors intended for DNA analysis. We then consider performance metrics, including limit of detection, specificity and multiplexing, and provide a comparison between living and in vitro DNA biosensors for various applications, highlighting differences in sample processing, equipment, DNA integrity, theranostics and biocontainment. Bacteria can be engineered as biosensors for the detection and analysis of DNA in unpurified samples. This Review examines the engineering of bacterial DNA biosensors, highlighting performance metrics and applications in comparison with in vitro DNA biosensors.
BACKGROUND:Stem cells are specialised precursor cells that can replace aged or damaged cells and thereby maintain healthy tissue function. Stem cell therapy is increasingly used as a treatment for knee osteoarthritis, despite the lack of clarity around the mechanism by which stem cell therapy may slow down disease progression in osteoarthritis, and uncertainty regarding its benefits and harms. OBJECTIVES:To assess the benefits and harms of stem cell injections for people with osteoarthritis of the knee. A secondary objective is to maintain the currency of the evidence, using a living systematic review approach. SEARCH METHODS:We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE and Embase on 15 September 2023, unrestricted by date or language of publication. We also searched ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) for relevant trial protocols and ongoing trials. SELECTION CRITERIA:We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), or trials using quasi-randomised methods of participant allocation, comparing stem cell injection with placebo injection, no treatment or usual care, glucocorticoid injection, other injections, exercise, drug therapy, surgical interventions, and supplements and complementary therapies in people with knee osteoarthritis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS:Two review authors selected studies for inclusion, extracted trial characteristics and outcome data, assessed risk of bias and assessed the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach. The primary comparison was stem cell injection compared with placebo injection. The primary time point for pain, function and quality of life was three to six months, and the end of the trial period for participant-reported success, joint structure changes and adverse event outcomes. Major outcomes were pain, function, quality of life, global assessment of success, radiographic joint progression, withdrawals due to adverse events and serious adverse events. MAIN RESULTS:We found 25 randomised trials (1341 participants) comparing stem cell injections with placebo injection (eight trials), no treatment or usual care (analgesia, weight loss and exercise) (two trials), glucocorticoid injection (one trial), hyaluronic acid injection (seven trials), platelet-rich plasma injections (two trials), oral acetaminophen (paracetamol) (one trial), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs plus physical therapy plus hyaluronic acid injection (one trial) and stem cell injection plus intra-articular co-intervention versus co-intervention alone (three trials) in people with osteoarthritis of the knee. Trials were predominantly small, with sample sizes ranging from 6 to 252 participants, with only two trials having more than 100 participants. The average age of participants across trials ranged from 51 to 66 years, and symptom duration varied from one to 10 years. Placebo-controlled trials were largely free from bias, while most trials without a placebo control were susceptible to performance and detection biases. Here, we limit reporting to the main comparison, stem cell injection versus placebo injection. Compared with placebo injection, stem cell injection may slightly improve pain and function up to six months after treatment. Mean pain (0 to 10 scale, 0 no pain) was 4.5 out of 10 points with placebo injection and 1.2 points better (2.5 points better to 0 points better) with stem cell injection (I2 = 80%; 7 studies, 445 participants). Mean function (0 to 100 scale, 0 best function) was 46.3 points with placebo injection and 14.2 points better (25.3 points better to 3.1 points better) with stem cell injection (I2 = 82%; 7 studies, 432 participants). We are uncertain whether stem cell injections improve quality of life or increase the number of people who report treatment success compared to placebo injection, because the certainty of the evidence was very low. Mean quality of life was 45.3 points with placebo injection and 22.8 points better (18.0 points worse to 63.7 points better) with stem cell injection (I2 = 96%; 2 studies, 288 participants) at up to six months follow-up. At the end of follow-up, 89/168 participants (530 per 1000) in the placebo injection group reported treatment success compared with 126/180 participants (683 per 1000) in the stem cell injection group (risk ratio (RR) 1.29, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.53; I2 = 0%; 4 trials, 348 participants). We downgraded the evidence to low certainty for pain and function due to indirectness (as the source, method of preparation and dose of stem cells varied across studies), and suspected publication bias (up to three larger RCTs have been conducted but withdrawn prior to reporting of results). For quality of life and treatment success, we further downgraded the evidence to very low certainty due to imprecision in addition to indirectness and suspected publication bias. We are uncertain of the potential harms associated with stem cell injection, as there were very low event rates for serious adverse events. At the end of follow-up, 5/219 participants (23 per 1000) in the placebo injection group experienced serious adverse events compared with 4/242 participants (16 per 1000) in the stem cell injection group (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.20 to 2.64; I2 = 0%; 7 trials, 461 participants) and there were no reported withdrawals due to adverse events. We downgraded the evidence to very low certainty due to indirectness, suspected publication bias and imprecision. Radiographic progression was not assessed in any of the included studies. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS:Compared with placebo injections and based upon low-certainty evidence, stem cell injections for people with knee osteoarthritis may slightly improve pain and function. We are uncertain of the effects of stem cell injections on quality of life or the number who report treatment success. Although the putative benefits of stem cell therapies for osteoarthritis include potential regenerative effects on damaged tissues, particularly articular cartilage, we remain uncertain of the effect of stem cell injections on structural progression in the knee (measured by radiographic appearance). There is also uncertainty regarding the safety of stem cell injections. Serious adverse events were infrequently reported, although all invasive joint procedures (including injections) carry a small risk of septic arthritis. The risk of other important harms, including potential concerns related to the use of a therapy with the theoretical capacity to promote cell growth, or to the use of allogeneic cells, remains unknown.
Abstract Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAF) and nerves, components of the tumor microenvironment, have each been shown to directly promote gastrointestinal cancers. However, it remains unknown whether these cells interact with each other to regulate cancer progression. We found that in colorectal cancer, norepinephrine induces ADRB2 (β2-adrenergic receptor)–dependent nerve growth factor (NGF) secretion from CAFs, which in turn increases intratumor sympathetic innervation and norepinephrine accumulation. Adrenergic stimulation accelerates colorectal cancer growth through ADRA2A/Gi-mediated activation of Yes-associated protein (YAP). NGF from CAFs directly enhances colorectal cancer cell growth via the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase/AKT pathway. Treatment with a tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitor decreased YAP and AKT activation and colorectal cancer progression in mice. In human colorectal cancer, high NGF expression is associated with mesenchymal-like tumor subtype and poor patient survival. These findings suggest a central role for reciprocal CAF–nerve cross-talk in promoting colorectal cancer progression. Blocking this feedforward loop with a TRK inhibitor may represent a potential therapeutic approach for colorectal cancer. Significance: Our work demonstrates that the bidirectional interplay between sympathetic nerves and NGF-expressing CAFs drives colorectal tumorigenesis. This study also offers novel mechanistic insights into catecholamine action in colorectal cancer. Inhibiting the neuro-mesenchymal interaction by TRK blockade could be a potential strategy for treating colorectal cancer.
Background Gastric cancer is often accompanied by a loss of MUC6, but its pathogenic role in gastric carcinogenesis remains unclear. Method Muc6 knockout (Muc6-/-) mice and Muc6-dsRED mice were newly generated. Tff1Cre, Golph3-/-, R26-Golgi-mCherry, Hes1flox/flox, Cosmcflox/flox, A4gnt-/- mice were also used. Histology, DNAs and RNAs, proteins, and sugar chains were analyzed by whole exon DNA sequence, RNA sequence, immunohistochemistry, lectin-binding assays, and LC-MS analysis. Gastric organoids and cell lines were used for in vitro assays and xenograft experiments. Result Deletion of Muc6 in mice spontaneously causes pan-gastritis and invasive gastric cancers. Muc6-deficient tumor growth was dependent on MAPK activation, mediated by Golgi stress-induced upregulation of GOLPH3. Glycomic profiling revealed aberrant expression of mannose-rich N-linked glycans in gastric tumors, detected with Banana lectin in association with lack of MUC6 expression. We identified a precursor of clusterin as a binding partner of mannose glycans. MAPK activation, Golgi stress responses, aberrant mannose expression are found in a separate Cosmc- and A4gnt-deficient mouse models which lack normal O-glycosylation. Banana lectin-drug conjugates proved an effective treatment for mannose-rich murine and human gastric cancer. Conclusion We propose that Golgi stress responses and aberrant glycans are important drivers of, and promising new therapeutic targets for gastric cancer.
Gastric cancer (GC) presents a significant health challenge and ranks as the fifth most common cancer in the world. Unfortunately, most patients with GC exhaust standard care treatment options due to late diagnosis and tumour heterogeneity that leads to drug resistance, resulting in poor survival outcomes. Potentially, this situation can be improved by personalising treatment choice. Organoids are an emerging cell model system that recapitulates tumour heterogeneity and drug responses. Coupled with genomic analysis, organoid culture can be used to guide personalised medicine. The GC organoid field, however, lacks standardised methodologies for assessing organoid drug sensitivities. Comparing results across different GC organoid studies and correlating organoid drug responses with patient outcomes is challenging. Hence, we aim to summarise the methodologies used in GC organoid drug testing and correlation with clinical outcomes and discuss design considerations and limitations to enhance the robustness of such studies in the future.
Bioengineered probiotics enable new opportunities to improve colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, prevention and treatment. Here, first, we demonstrate selective colonization of colorectal adenomas after oral delivery of probiotic E. coli Nissle 1917 (EcN) to a genetically-engineered murine model of CRC predisposition and orthotopic models of CRC. We next undertake an interventional, double-blind, dual-centre, prospective clinical trial, in which CRC patients take either placebo or EcN for two weeks prior to resection of neoplastic and adjacent normal colorectal tissue (ACTRN12619000210178). We detect enrichment of EcN in tumor samples over normal tissue from probiotic-treated patients (primary outcome of the trial). Next, we develop early CRC intervention strategies. To detect lesions, we engineer EcN to produce a small molecule, salicylate. Oral delivery of this strain results in increased levels of salicylate in the urine of adenoma-bearing mice, in comparison to healthy controls. To assess therapeutic potential, we engineer EcN to locally release a cytokine, GM-CSF, and blocking nanobodies against PD-L1 and CTLA-4 at the neoplastic site, and demonstrate that oral delivery of this strain reduces adenoma burden by ~50%. Together, these results support the use of EcN as an orally-deliverable platform to detect disease and treat CRC through the production of screening and therapeutic molecules.
The last decade has seen a rapid increase in studies utilising a genetically modified probiotic, Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 (EcN), as a chassis for cancer treatment and detection. This approach relies on the ability of EcN to home to and selectively colonise tumours over normal tissue, a characteristic common to some bacteria that is thought to result from the low-oxygen, nutrient-rich and immune-privileged niche the tumour provides. Pre-clinical studies have used genetically modified EcN to deliver therapeutic payloads that show efficacy in reducing tumour burden as a result of high-tumour and low off-target colonisation. Most recently, the EcN chassis has been expanded into an effective tumour-detection tool. These advances provide strong justification for the movement of genetically modified EcN into clinical oncology trials. What is currently unknown in the field is a deep mechanistic understanding of how EcN distributes to and localises within tumours. This review summarises the existing EcN literature, with the inclusion of research undertaken with other tumour-homing and pathogenic bacteria, to provide insights into possible mechanisms of EcN tumour homing for future validation. Understanding exactly how and why EcN colonises neoplastic tissue will inform the design and testing of the next generation of EcN chassis strains to address biosafety and containment concerns and optimise the detection and treatment of cancer.
Supplementary data contains additional methods and figures. The figures contain the following information: Supplementary Figure 1 extends Figure 1 providing evidence that Meflin is expressed in BM MSCs and PSCs in mice. Supplementary Figure 2 supports Figure 1 showing the development of the Meflin-ZDC mice. Supplementary Figure 3-5 extend Figure 1 providing additional evidence that Meflin is specifically expressed in PSCs and CAFs and its expression is regulated by calcipotriol. Supplementary Figure 6-9 support Figure 2 showing the detection of Meflin expression at the protein and mRNA levels in human and mouse PDAC. Supplementary Figure 10 and 11 support Figure 2 showing the data of single-cell RNA sequencing of CAFs isolated from PDAC and breast cancer mouse models. Supplementary Figure 12 supports Figure 3 showing the effects of Meflin depletion on the global gene expression profiles in mouse MSCs. Supplementary Figure 13 supports Figure 3 showing the analysis of tumors developed in WT and Meflin-KO KPC mice. Supplementary Figure 14 supports Figure 6 showing the development of the Meflin-CreERT2 mice. Supplementary Figure 15 and 16 support Figure 7 showing the effect of exogenous Meflin expression on MSC gene expression and the growth of xenograft tumors. Supplementary Figure 17 support Figure 7 showing the role of Meflin in collagen remodeling in mouse and human PDAC. Supplementary Table 1 and 2 show the description of the cohort of PDAC patients included in the analysis and univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis of human PDAC cases.
Osteoarthritis (OA) is characterised by an irreversible degeneration of articular cartilage. Here we show that the BMP-antagonist Gremlin 1 ( Grem1 ) marks a bipotent chondrogenic and osteogenic progenitor cell population within the articular surface. Notably, these progenitors are depleted by injury-induced OA and increasing age. OA is also caused by ablation of Grem1 cells in mice. Transcriptomic and functional analysis in mice found that articular surface Grem1 -lineage cells are dependent on Foxo1 and ablation of Foxo1 in Grem1 -lineage cells caused OA. FGFR3 signalling was confirmed as a promising therapeutic pathway by administration of pathway activator, FGF18, resulting in Grem1 -lineage chondrocyte progenitor cell proliferation, increased cartilage thickness and reduced OA. These findings suggest that OA, in part, is caused by mechanical, developmental or age-related attrition of Grem1 expressing articular cartilage progenitor cells. These cells, and the FGFR3 signalling pathway that sustains them, may be effective future targets for biological management of OA.
Synthetic biology has developed sophisticated cellular biosensors to detect and respond to human disease. However, biosensors have not yet been engineered to detect specific extracellular DNA sequences and mutations. Here, we engineered naturally competent Acinetobacter baylyi to detect donor DNA from the genomes of colorectal cancer (CRC) cells, organoids, and tumors. We characterized the functionality of the biosensors in vitro with coculture assays and then validated them in vivo with sensor bacteria delivered to mice harboring colorectal tumors. We observed horizontal gene transfer from the tumor to the sensor bacteria in our mouse model of CRC. This cellular assay for targeted, CRISPR-discriminated horizontal gene transfer (CATCH) enables the biodetection of specific cell-free DNA.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common and deadly disease. Unfortunately, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) fail to elicit effective anti-tumour responses in the vast majority of CRC patients. Patients that are most likely to respond are those with DNA mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) and microsatellite instability (MSI) disease. However, reliable predictors of ICI response are lacking, even within the dMMR/MSI subtype. This, together with identification of novel mechanisms to increase response rates and prevent resistance, are ongoing and vitally important unmet needs. To address the current challenges with translation of early research findings into effective therapeutic strategies, this review summarises the present state of preclinical testing used to inform the development of immuno-regulatory treatment strategies for CRC. The shortfalls and advantages of commonly utilised mouse models of CRC, including chemically induced, transplant and transgenic approaches are highlighted. Appropriate use of existing models, incorporation of patient-derived data and development of cutting-edge models that recapitulate important features of human disease will be key to accelerating clinically relevant research in this area.
Abstract Bioengineered probiotics enable new opportunities to improve colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, prevention and treatment strategies. Here, we demonstrate selective colonization of CRC tumors with the orally-delivered probiotic E. coli Nissle 1917 (EcN) in genetically-engineered and orthotopic murine models of CRC, and human CRC patients. We subsequently engineer EcN to produce screening and therapeutic molecules, resulting in non-invasive detection of precursor CRC lesions and reduction of tumor burden through local induction of robust anti-tumor immunity. Citation Format: Candice R. Gurbatri, Georgette Radford, Jongwon Im, Courtney Coker, Nicholas Arpaia, Susan L. Woods, Daniel L. Worthley, Tal Danino. Colon cancer screening and treatment with engineered probiotics [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 6525.
Background and Aims:Although Helicobacter pylori is the most important bacterial carcinogen in gastric cancer (GC), GC can emerge even after H. pylori eradication. Studies suggest that various constituents of the gastric microbiome may influence GC development, but the role of individual pathogens is unclear. Methods:Human gastric mucosal samples were analyzed by 16SrRNA sequencing to investigate microbiome composition and its association with clinical parameters, including GC risk. Identified bacteria in the stomach were cocultured with gastric epithelial cells or inoculated into mice, and transcriptomic changes, DNA damage, and inflammation were analyzed. Bacterial reads in GC tissues were examined together with transcriptomic and genetic sequencing data in the cancer genome atlas dataset. Results:Patients after Helicobacter pylori eradication formed 3 subgroups based on the microbial composition revealed by 16SrRNA sequencing. One dysbiotic group enriched with Fusobacterium and Neisseria species was associated with a significantly higher GC incidence. These species activated prooncogenic pathways in gastric epithelial cells and promoted inflammation in mouse stomachs. Sugar chains that constitute gastric mucin attenuate host-bacteria interactions. Metabolites from Fusobacterium species were genotoxic, and the presence of the bacteria was associated with an inflammatory signature and a higher tumor mutation burden. Conclusion:Gastric microbiota in the dysbiotic stomach is associated with GC development after H. pylori eradication and plays a pathogenic role through direct host-bacteria interaction.