Mitochondrial dysfunction underlies a broad spectrum of primary and secondary disorders, yet current frameworks do not fully capture how diverse genetic, metabolic, and environmental stressors converge on shared pathological outcomes. Here, we propose that mitoredox shifts - bidirectional disruptions in mitochondrial redox homeostasis that alter mitochondrial quality control and genome-stability pathways - serve as a unifying axis linking oxidative stress, mitochondrial quality control failure, heteroplasmy dynamics, and regulated cell death. Both hyperactive and hypoactive mitochondrial states destabilize redox balance, altering PINK1/Parkin-dependent and receptor-mediated mitophagy, disrupting proteostasis, and reshaping mitochondrial network dynamics. These redox-driven perturbations influence the propagation of pathogenic mtDNA variants, modulate tissue-specific threshold effects, and bias cells toward apoptosis, ferroptosis, cuproptosis, and other regulated cell death pathways. We synthesize emerging evidence across mitochondrial genetics, bioenergetics, and redox signaling to outline how mitoredox shifts accelerate disease progression in both primary mitochondrial syndromes and secondary mitochondrial dysfunction. We further evaluate the expanding landscape of diagnostic biomarkers, including FGF21, GDF15, imaging-based oculomics, and high-throughput proteomic and genomic assays. In parallel, we highlight therapeutic strategies aimed at restoring redox balance, enhancing mitophagy, or shifting mitochondrial network composition by diluting dysfunctional organelles through mitochondrial transplantation. By emphasizing mitoredox imbalance as a recurrent feature of disease, this work synthesizes emerging diagnostic and therapeutic approaches across rare and common mitochondrial disorders.

Despite emerging novel therapies, treating acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains challenging. Complexities persist in designing pivotal clinical trials and establishing acceptable endpoints for AML. Recent FDA guidance for drug and biological products development for AML outlines considerations for trial design. The guidance defines overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) as endpoints representing clinical benefit for AML therapies without curative intent. We highlight the EFS definition, particularly the assignment of day 1 as the event date for patients with induction treatment failures (ITFs), as recommended in the guidance. Through a comprehensive simulation study, our results show that the guidance EFS definition performs adequately with high complete remission (CR) rates but may pose challenges for low CR rates. When the experimental arm CR rate is 5% or less over the control, the use of the ITF events at day 1 for EFS definition leads to a critical power decrease, hampering the ability to predict survival benefit for a moderate OS duration. We further expand upon the EFS definition with the event date at ITF period end. Our goal is to inform investigators and regulatory agencies about the implications and limitations of various EFS definitions for future pivotal trials in AML.

This phase 2 study investigated pevonedistat + azacitidine + venetoclax (n = 83) versus azacitidine + venetoclax (n = 81) in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. The study was stopped early following negative results from PANTHER, which evaluated pevonedistat in higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes/chronic myelomonocytic leukemia or low-blast AML. Outcomes were analyzed up to the datacut. For pevonedistat + azacitidine + venetoclax versus azacitidine + venetoclax, the median follow-up was 8.44 versus 7.95 months; the complete remission (CR) rate was 45% versus 49%; composite CR (CCR; CR+CR with incomplete blood count recovery) was 77% versus 72%. There were no differences in event-free survival (primary endpoint; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.61-1.60; p = 0.477) or overall survival (HR: 1.42; 95% CI: 0.82-2.49; p = 0.896). In exploratory analyses in IDH-mutated AML, CCR rates were higher with pevonedistat + azacitidine + venetoclax versus azacitidine + venetoclax. Safety was similar between treatment arms. Efficacy/safety with azacitidine + venetoclax was consistent with the phase 3 VIALE-A study. TRIAL REGISTRATION:NCT04266795.

Background Iadademstat is a potent, selective, oral inhibitor of both the enzymatic and scaffolding activities of the transcriptional repressor lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1; also known as KDM1A) that showed promising early activity and safety in a phase 1 trial and strong preclinical synergy with azacitidine in acute myeloid leukaemia cell lines. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the combination of iadademstat and azacitidine for the treatment of adult patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukaemia. Methods The open-label, phase 2a, dose-finding ALICE study was conducted at six hospitals in Spain and enrolled patients aged 18 years or older with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukaemia not eligible for intensive chemotherapy and an ECOG performance status of 0-2. In the dose escalation portion of the trial, patients received a starting dose of iadademstat at 90 mu g/m 2 per day (with de-escalation to 60 mu g/m 2 per day and escalation up to 140 mu g/m 2 per day) orally, for 5 days on, 2 days off weekly, with azacitidine 75 mg/m 2 subcutaneously, for seven of 28 days. The primary objectives were safety (analysed in the safety analysis set; all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment) and establishing the recommended phase 2 dose; secondary objectives included response rates in the efficacy analysis set (all patients who had at least one efficacy assessment). This study is registered on EudraCT (EudraCT 2018-000482-36) and has been completed. Findings Between Nov 12, 2018, and Sept 30, 2021, 36 patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukaemia were enrolled; the median age was 76 (IQR 74-79) years, all patients were White, 18 (50%) were male, and 18 (50%) were female, and all had intermediate-risk or adverse-risk acute myeloid leukaemia. The median follow-up was 22 (IQR 16-31) months. The most frequent (>= 10%) adverse events considered to be related to treatment were decreases in platelet (25 [69%]) and neutrophil (22 [61%]) counts (all grade 3-4) and anaemia (15 [42%]; of which ten [28%] were grade 3-4). Three patients had treatment-related serious adverse events (one fatal grade 5 intracranial haemorrhage, one grade 3 differentiation syndrome, and one grade 3 febrile neutropenia). Based on safety, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data, and efficacy, the recommended phase 2 dose of iadademstat was 90 mu g/m 2 per day with azacitidine. 22 (82%; 95% CI 62-94) of 27 patients in the efficacy analysis set had an objective response. 14 (52%) of 27 patients had complete remission or complete remission with incomplete haematological recovery; of these, ten of 11 evaluable for measurable residual disease achieved negativity. In the safety analysis set, 22 (61%) of 36 patients had an objective response. Interpretation The combination of iadademstat and azacitidine has a manageable safety profile and shows promising responses in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukaemia, including those with high-risk prognostic factors.

Objective This phase 2 study investigated sapanisertib (selective dual inhibitor of mTORC1/2) alone, or in combination with paclitaxel or TAK-117 (a selective small molecule inhibitor of PI3K), versus paclitaxel alone in advanced, recurrent, or persistent endometrial cancer.Methods Patients with histologic diagnosis of endometrial cancer (1-2 prior regimens) were randomized to 28-day cycles on four treatment arms: 1) weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m(2) (days 1, 8, and 15); 2) weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m(2) + oral sapanisertib 4 mg on days 2-4, 9-11, 16-18, and 23-25; 3) weekly sapanisertib 30 mg, or 4) sapanisertib 4 mg + TAK-117 200 mg on days 1-3, 8-10, 15-17, and 22-24.Results Of 241 patients randomized, 234 received treatment (paclitaxel, n = 87 [3 ongoing]; paclitaxel+sapanisertib, n = 86 [3 ongoing]; sapanisertib, n = 41; sapanisertib+TAK-117, n = 20). The sapanisertib and sapanisertib+TAK-117 arms were closed to enrollment after futility analyses. After a median follow-up of 14.4 (paclitaxel) versus 17.2 (paclitaxel+sapanisertib) months, median progression-free survival (PFS; primary endpoint) was 3.7 versus 5.6 months (hazard ratio [HR] 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.58-1.15; p = 0.139); in patients with endometrioid histology (n = 116), median PFS was 3.3 versus 5.7 months (HR 0.66; 95% CI 0.43-1.03). Grade >= 3 treatment-emergent adverse event rates were 54.0% with paclitaxel versus 89.5% paclitaxel+sapanisertib.Conclusions Our findings support inclusion of chemotherapy combinations with investigational agents for advanced or metastatic disease. The primary endpoint was not met and toxicity was manageable.

Patient-reported outcomes in AL amyloidosis have not been well-studied. We analyzed health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and AL amyloidosis symptoms data from the phase 3 TOURMALINE-AL1 trial (NCT01659658) (ixazomib-dexamethasone, n = 85; physician's choice of chemotherapy [PC], n = 83). HRQOL and symptom burden were measured with the SF-36v2, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group Neurotoxicity subscale (FACT/GOG-Ntx), and an amyloidosis symptom questionnaire (ASQ). Score changes during treatment were analyzed descriptively and using repeated-measures linear mixed models; analyses were not adjusted for multiplicity. Least-squares (LS) mean changes from baseline were significantly higher (better HRQOL) for ixazomib-dexamethasone at several cycles for SF-36v2 Role Physical and Vitality subscales (p < .05); no subscales demonstrated significant differences favoring PC. For FACT/GOG-Ntx, small but significant differences in LS mean changes favored ixazomib-dexamethasone over PC at multiple cycles for seven items and both summary scores; significant differences favored PC for one item (trouble hearing) at multiple cycles. ASQ total score trended downward (lower burden) in both arms; significant LS mean differences favored ixazomib-dexamethasone over PC at some cycles (p < .05). Patients with relapsed/refractory AL amyloidosis treated with ixazomib-dexamethasone experienced HRQOL and symptoms that were similar to or trended better than patients treated with PC despite longer duration of therapy.

TPS7075 Background: Epigenetic dysregulation is a hallmark of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and is caused by recurrent translocations and/or mutations in chromatin regulators and transcription factors, resulting in myeloid differentiation blockade and leukemic stem cell renewal. Accordingly, about 70% of recurring mutations in AML patients (pts) target regulators of gene expression, underscoring the potential of epigenetic therapies to change the disease natural history. Iadademstat (iada/ORY-1001) is a specific, oral, potent, covalent inhibitor of the epigenetic Lysine-Specific Demethylase 1 (LSD1/KDMA1) enzyme. In preclinical and clinical studies iada decreased leukemic stem cell survival and induced macrophage/monocytic differentiation of blasts. ALICE, a Ph2 study of iada in combination with azacitidine (aza), showed high complete remission (CR/CRi) rates and durable responses in treatment naïve, unfit AML pts without exacerbating the toxicity profile of aza (Salamero et al., Oral at ASH 2022). Despite improvements in AML therapy, relapsed and refractory (R/R) cases are frequent and contribute to the death of more than 50% of pts, particularly in those subpopulations with higher risk genetics, the largest of which (up to 30-40% AML pts) harbors fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 mutations (FLT3mut+). Use of the FLT3 inhibitor (FLT3i) gilteritinib as monotherapy for R/R pts resulted in improved outcomes but the duration of remission achieved is transient and often brief (CR rate: 20%; EFS: 2.8 months) per the ADMIRAL Ph3 study (Perl, et al., NEJM 2019). Preclinically, iada has marked synergy with FLT3i, particularly gilteritinib, in FLT3 wild-type and FLT3 mut+ AML cells and in derived cell lines resistant to venetoclax, azacitidine and FLT3is. Methods: Adult pts with ECOG 0-2 and FLT3 mut+ R/R AML, after 1 or 2 prior lines of therapy, will be enrolled. In escalation (3+3), up to 18 pts will receive iada at 75 to 150 ug, orally, in 5 days ON-2 days OFF schedule, with gilteritinib SoC. Up to approximate 14 pts will be expanded from pharmacologically active dose/s (per Project OPTIMUS). Primary endpoints of the study are safety and RP2D determination. Bayesian posterior probability efficacy monitoring will be performed periodically for each dose cohort. Bayesian efficacy futility and early stopping boundary will be applied. Posterior probability criterion (Prob (CR > 0.3) ≥ 0.60) at the end of the study will warrant further research. Safety in expansion will be evaluated continuously with a Bayesian stopping rule. Secondary endpoints include OS, EFS, CR, CR/CRh, ORR, TTR, DoR, and transfusion rate. Exploratory endpoints include PK, PD, MRD and gene mutational analysis. The study will run in 15 US sites. Additional sites will be added for a subsequent Phase 2 randomized controlled double-blinded FRIDA 2 study to assess the efficacy of this combination in R/R FLT3 mut+ AML. Clinical trial information: NCT05546580 .

Over 65 million people suffer from recurrent, unprovoked seizures. The lack of validated biomarkers specific for myriad forms of epilepsy makes diagnosis challenging. Diagnosis and monitoring of childhood epilepsy add to the need for non-invasive biomarkers, especially when evaluating antiseizure medications. Although underlying mechanisms of epileptogenesis are not fully understood, evidence for mitochondrial involvement is substantial. Seizures affect 35%-60% of patients diagnosed with mitochondrial diseases. Mitochondrial dysfunction is pathophysiological in various epilepsies, including those of non-mitochondrial origin. Decreased ATP production caused by malfunctioning brain cell mitochondria leads to altered neuronal bioenergetics, metabolism and neurological complications, including seizures. Iron-dependent lipid peroxidation initiates ferroptosis, a cell death pathway that aligns with altered mitochondrial bioenergetics, metabolism and morphology found in neurodegenerative diseases (NDDs). Studies in mouse genetic models with seizure phenotypes where the function of an essential selenoprotein (GPX4) is targeted suggest roles for ferroptosis in epilepsy. GPX4 is pivotal in NDDs, where selenium protects interneurons from ferroptosis. Selenium is an essential central nervous system micronutrient and trace element. Low serum concentrations of selenium and other trace elements and minerals, including iron, are noted in diagnosing childhood epilepsy. Selenium supplements alleviate intractable seizures in children with reduced GPX activity. Copper and cuproptosis, like iron and ferroptosis, link to mitochondria and NDDs. Connecting these mechanistic pathways to selenoproteins provides new insights into treating seizures, pointing to using medicines including prodrugs of lipoic acid to treat epilepsy and to potential alternative therapeutic approaches including transcranial magnetic stimulation (transcranial), photobiomodulation and vagus nerve stimulation.

Supplementary Figure 2. Combination therapy with macitentan plus TMZ eradicates experimental glioblastomas.

Fig.S1: The level of p27Kip1 mRNA was unaffected by SIRT1 silencing. The mRNA levels of p27 were measured by quantitative RT-PCR analysis. 5 mg RNA extracted from SIRT1 silenced (shSIRT1) or shRNA control (shControl) H1299 and H460 cells. The mRNA levels of p27 are expressed relative to b-actin transcripts. Each experiment was performed in triplicate and repeated three times. The error bars represent the SEM. Fig.S2: SIRT1 silencing has no effect on apoptosis. Cell extracts were made from SIRT1- silenced and shRNA-control H1299 and H460 cells, and immunoblot analysis was performed with PARP and β-actin antibodies. Fig.S3: A. SIRT1 has no effect on p21 expression in both p53 wild type and p53 null cells. Cell extracts were made from SIRT1-silenced and shRNA-control H460 (p53+/+) and H1299 (p53-/-) cells, and immunoblot analysis was performed with anti-acetylated-p53, p21 and β-actin antibodies. B. p16 is deleted in NSCLC H460 and A549 cells. Cell extracts were made from SIRT1-silenced and shRNA-control H460 (p16-/-) and A549 (p16-/-) cells, or p16 wild type Hela cells. The immunoblot analysis was performed with anti-acetylated-p16, and β-actin antibodies. Table 1. The p27, p53 and p16 status in studied NSCLC cell lines.

Key Points • Nanatinostat plus valganciclovir is a novel oral regimen for relapsed/refractory EBV+ lymphoma that warrants further investigation.• Encouraging efficacy and safety were observed across a variety of EBV+ lymphoma subtypes.

Background: Frontline and relapsed /refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients carrying fms-related tyrosine kinase 3 [FLT3]-mutations (FLT3 mut+) benefit from FLT3 inhibitors (FLT3i) that have emerged as active therapeutic agents for this subset of AML encompassing up to 30-40% of all AML cases. The FLT3i gilteritinib, as monotherapy for R/R AML pts, has improved outcomes but the duration of remission achieved is transient and often brief. The Phase 3 randomized ADMIRAL trial of gilteritinib demonstrated a 20% CR rate and 2.8 months event-free-survival (EFS) (Perl, et al., NEJM 2019). The development of new targeted agents which synergize with FLT3 inhibitors, and ideally also inhibit the emergence of resistance, is therefore a major medical need in AML. Iadademstat (iada/ORY-1001) is a specific, oral, potent, covalent inhibitor of the epigenetic Lysine-Specific Demethylase 1 (LSD1/KDMA1) enzyme. Epigenetic dysregulation is a hallmark of AML. Up to 70% of recurring mutations in AML patients target epigenetic regulators of gene expression, resulting in myeloid differentiation blockade and enhanced leukemic stem cell renewal, underscoring the potential of epigenetic therapies to change the natural history of the disease. Preclinically, iada produces striking synergy with FLT3is, particularly gilteritinib in FLT3 wild-type and FLT3 mut+ AML cells and in derived cell lines resistant to venetoclax, azacitidine and other FLT3is (Sacilotto et al., 2022 Eur J. of Cancer 174S1). The novel MOAs generating this synergy in combinations include activation of a pro-differentiating epigenetic transcriptional program with simultaneous suppression of MYC-driven target genes (Yashar, et al. 2023, Mol. Cancer Res). The recently completed Phase 2 study of iada in combination with azacitidine (ALICE) produced a high rate of composite remission, including complete remission (CR) and CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi) (mostly MRD negative), as well as durable responses, in treatment naïve, unfit AML patients (pts), without exacerbating the toxicity profile of azacitidine (Salamero et al., 2022, Blood S1). The FRIDA study (NCT05546580) aims to establish the safety, tolerability, and the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of the combination of iada plus gilteritinib in FLT3 mut+ R/R AML. Methods: Adult pts with body weight ≥50 Kg and ECOG 0-2, with FLT3 mut+ R/R AML, after no more than 2 prior lines of therapy, are enrolling. Certain patients with prior exposure to FLT3is including gilteritinib may be eligible. Up to 18 pts, in a 3+3 escalation phase, will receive iada at doses of 75 to 150 ug, orally, in 5 days ON - 2 days OFF schedule, with continuous gilteritinib, at 120 mg/day orally. In the expansion phase, up to 14 pts at the selected safe and pharmacologically active dose/s (determined based on all available data from escalation pts including PK, target engagement (TE), safety, tolerability, and emerging activity) will be enrolled. Primary endpoints of the study are safety and RP2D determination, based on the same 5 criteria outlined above. Bayesian posterior probability efficacy monitoring will be performed periodically for each dose cohort in the expansion phase. Bayesian efficacy futility and early stopping boundary will be applied during the monitoring. Posterior probability criterion (Prob (CR>0.3) ≥ 0.60) at the end of the study will warrant additional development. The safety of the combination treatment will also be continuously evaluated during expansion following a Bayesian design stopping rule.Secondary endpoints include overall survival, EFS, CR, CR/CR with partial hematologic recovery (CRh), overall response rates, time to response, duration of response, and transfusion rate. Exploratory endpoints include measurable residual disease and gene mutational analysis. At the time of the submission, FRIDA is enrolling a second dose level cohort in escalation phase and plans to have the 15 sites open to accrual in the US by the end of 2023. Additional sites will be added for a subsequent randomized controlled double-blinded FRIDA 2 study to assess the efficacy of the iada and gilteritinib combination in R/R FLT3 mut+ AML.

The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of pevonedistat, a neural precursor cell expressed, developmentally down‐regulated protein 8 (NEDD8)‐activating enzyme inhibitor, on the heart rate‐corrected QT (QTc) interval in cancer patients. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive pevonedistat 25 or 50 mg/m 2 on day 1 and the alternate dose on day 8. Triplicate electrocardiograms were collected at intervals over 0–11 hours and at 24 hours via Holter recorders on days −1 (baseline), 1, and 8. Changes from time‐matched baseline values were calculated for QTc by Fridericia (QTcF), PR, and QRS intervals. Serial time‐matched blood samples for analysis of pevonedistat plasma pharmacokinetics were collected and a concentration–QTc analysis conducted. Safety was assessed by monitoring vital signs, physical examinations, and clinical laboratory tests. Forty‐four patients were included in the QTc analysis. Maximum least square (LS) mean increase from time‐matched baseline in QTcF was 3.2 milliseconds at 1 hour postdose for pevonedistat at 25 mg/m 2 , while the LSs mean change from baseline in QTcF was −1.7 milliseconds 1 hour postdose at 50 mg/m 2 . The maximum 2‐sided 90% upper confidence bound was 6.7 and 2.9 milliseconds for pevonedistat at 25 and 50 mg/m 2 , respectively. Pevonedistat did not result in clinically relevant effects on heart rate, nor on PR or QRS intervals. Results from pevonedistat concentration–QTc analysis were consistent with these findings. Administration of pevonedistat to cancer patients at a dose of up to 50 mg/m 2 showed no evidence of QT prolongation, indicative of the lack of clinically meaningful effects on cardiac repolarization. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03330106 (first registered on November 6, 2017).

Summary Pevonedistat (TAK-924/MLN4924) is an investigational small molecule inhibitor of the NEDD8-activating enzyme that has demonstrated clinical activity across solid tumors and hematological malignancies. Here we report the results of a phase 1 study evaluating the effect of rifampin, a strong CYP3A inducer, on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of pevonedistat in patients with advanced solid tumors (NCT03486314). Patients received a single 50 mg/m 2 pevonedistat dose via a 1-h infusion on Days 1 (in the absence of rifampin) and 10 (in the presence of rifampin), and daily oral dosing of rifampin 600 mg on Days 3–11. Twenty patients were enrolled and were evaluable for PK and safety. Following a single dose of pevonedistat at 50 mg/m 2 , the mean terminal half-life of pevonedistat was 5.7 and 7.4 h in the presence and in the absence of rifampin, respectively. The geometric mean AUC 0–inf of pevonedistat in the presence of rifampin was 79% of that without rifampin (90% CI: 69.2%–90.2%). The geometric mean C max of pevonedistat in the presence of rifampin was similar to that in the absence of rifampin (96.2%; 90% CI: 79.2%–117%). Coadministration of pevonedistat with rifampin, a strong metabolic enzyme inducer, did not result in clinically meaningful decreases in systemic exposures of pevonedistat. The study results support the recommendation that no pevonedistat dose adjustment is needed for patients receiving concomitant CYP3A inducers. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03486314.

BACKGROUND  Primary systemic light-chain (AL) amyloidosis is a rare clonal plasma cell disorder characterized by the production of abnormal immunoglobulin fragments, which form insoluble fibrils that aggregate as amyloid deposits in organs and tissues, leading to organ dysfunction and death. OBJECTIVES  The aim of this literature review is to increase awareness of AL amyloidosis and educate nurses on the care of this patient population. METHODS  This overview is based on a literature search of AL amyloidosis, including its pathogenesis, prognosis, and presentation. Guidance for nursing assessment, intervention, and patient education throughout the disease trajectory is presented. FINDINGS  AL amyloidosis is a rare disease resulting in organ impairment and death if untreated. Nursing management includes knowledge of key assessment, monitoring, intervention, and education strategies with goals to preserve organ function and improve survival and quality of life in patients with AL amyloidosis.

BACKGROUND:NFE2L2 and/or KEAP1 mutations are associated with worse prognosis in all non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We determined real-world survival outcomes and treatment patterns among patients with advanced squamous cell NSCLC by NFE2L2 and KEAP1 mutation status.PATIENTS AND METHODS:A retrospective study (January 2011-December 2018) was conducted using a de-identified US-based clinico-genomic database. Adult patients with advanced squamous cell NSCLC with ≥ 2 in-network visits and comprehensive genomic profiling during the study period were included. Outcomes included real-world progression free survival (rwPFS) by line of therapy and overall survival (OS). The real-world effectiveness of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 first-line therapy was also evaluated in patients with a NFE2L2 and/or KEAP1 mutation.RESULTS:Of 703 patients included (median age: 70.0 years), 31.6% had a NFE2L2 and/or KEAP1 mutation. The most common first- and second-line treatments regardless of mutation status were platinum-based chemotherapies and anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapies. The most common third-line treatment was anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy in patients with a NFE2L2 and/or KEAP1 mutation and single-agent chemotherapy in patients with wild-type disease. Patients with a NFE2L2 and/or KEAP1 mutation versus wild-type disease had significantly shorter rwPFS (4.54 vs. 6.25 months; P  =  .003) following first- but not second- or third-line therapy and shorter median OS (13.59 vs. 17.37 months; P  =  .4105). No survival differences were observed in patients with a NFE2L2 and/or KEAP1 mutation receiving first-line anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapies versus other therapies.CONCLUSIONS:Patients with advanced squamous cell NSCLC with a NFE2L2 and/or KEAP1 mutation have poor real-world survival, highlighting the need for a genotype-directed therapeutic strategy in this population.

PANTHER is a global, randomized phase 3 trial of pevonedistat+azacitidine (n = 227) vs azacitidine monotherapy (n = 227) in patients with newly diagnosed higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS; n = 324), higher-risk chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (n = 27), or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with 20% to 30% blasts (n = 103). The primary end point was event-free survival (EFS). In the intent-to-treat population, the median EFS was 17.7 months with pevonedistat+azacitidine vs 15.7 months with azacitidine (hazard ratio [HR], 0.968; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.757-1.238; P = .557) and in the higher-risk MDS cohort, median EFS was 19.2 vs 15.6 months (HR, 0.887; 95% CI, 0.659-1.193; P = .431). Median overall survival (OS) in the higher-risk MDS cohort was 21.6 vs 17.5 months (HR, 0.785; P = .092), and in patients with AML with 20% to 30% blasts was 14.5 vs 14.7 months (HR, 1.107; P = .664). In a post hoc analysis, median OS in the higher-risk MDS cohort for patients receiving >3 cycles was 23.8 vs 20.6 months (P = .021) and for >6 cycles was 27.1 vs 22.5 months (P = .008). No new safety signals were identified, and the azacitidine dose intensity was maintained. Common hematologic grade ≥3 treatment emergent adverse events were anemia (33% vs 34%), neutropenia (31% vs 33%), and thrombocytopenia (30% vs 30%). These results underscore the importance of large, randomized controlled trials in these heterogeneous myeloid diseases and the value of continuing therapy for >3 cycles. The trial was registered on clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03268954.

Pathological deterioration of mitochondrial function is increasingly linked with multiple degenerative illnesses as a mediator of a wide range of neurologic and age-related chronic diseases, including those of genetic origin. Several of these diseases are rare, typically defined in the United States as an illness affecting fewer than 200,000 people in the U.S. population, or about one in 1600 individuals. Vision impairment due to mitochondrial dysfunction in the eye is a prominent feature evident in numerous primary mitochondrial diseases and is common to the pathophysiology of many of the familiar ophthalmic disorders, including age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, glaucoma and retinopathy of prematurity — a collection of syndromes, diseases and disorders with significant unmet medical needs. Focusing on metabolic mitochondrial pathway mechanisms, including the possible roles of cuproptosis and ferroptosis in retinal mitochondrial dysfunction, we shed light on the potential of α-lipoyl-L-carnitine in treating eye diseases. α-Lipoyl-L-carnitine is a bioavailable mitochondria-targeting lipoic acid prodrug that has shown potential in protecting against retinal degeneration and photoreceptor cell loss in ophthalmic indications.