BackgroundFeasibility of transfemoral (TF) transcathteter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is limited by the smallest diameter, the calcification and tortuosity of the iliofemoral access vessels. The use of the Portico system without delivery sheath results in significantly lower profile delivery system compared to standard technique. We herein report our single center experience, feasibility and safety of such an approach.MethodsThe Portico valve was implanted sheathless in 81 high‐risk patients with severe aortic stenosis utilizing percutaneous femoral access. Mean minimal diameter of the ileo‐femoral arterial access was 7.06 ± 1.89 mm. In most cases a multidetector computed tomography was performed before the intervention to assess the feasibility of vascular access and for aortic annulus measurements. The vascular access site was preclosed using two ProGlide suture systems.ResultsDevice implantation was successful 98.7% of patients. Valve recapturing and repositioning as well as valve‐in‐valve deployment was performed in only one case (1.2%). There were no infarctions, 2 strokes (2.4%) and 2 acute kidney failure (2.4%), 1 major vascular complication1 (1.2%) 4 major bleedings (4.9%), 11 conductions disturbances and relative pace‐maker implantations (14.2%). The mean gradient decreased from 42.3 ± 17 to 6.3 ± 2.78 mm Hg. Paravalvular regurgitation as assessed by TTE at discharge was absent or trivial in 19 patients, mild in 60 and moderate 1. Thirty‐day mortality was 2.4%.ConclusionsSheathless use of the Portico valve is feasible and appears to be safe, with excellent rates of complications and mortality in the short‐term. Such an approach has the potential to further expand feasibility of TF TAVR to patients with severe peripheral arterial disease. Feasibility in patients with smaller femoral access and more challenging anatomy has to be proven in further studies. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Aims: The use of left atrial appendage (LAA) occluders in atrial fibrillation is increasing. There are few data on the comparison between transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and computed tomography (MDCT) assessing peridevice flow and outcome of electrical cardioversion (ECV) in these patients.Methods and results: Single-center prospective registry from 2009 to 2015 including all LAA occluders to analyze success and complications during implantation and follow-up. Patients having >= 1 ECV were further analyzed. TEE was performed during implantation and at 6 weeks. In a subgroup of 77 patients, we compared MDCT with TEE at 6 weeks. Overall, 135 patients (69 +/- 9 years; 70% male; CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc score: 3.6 +/- 1.4; HAS-BLED score: 2.5 +/- 0.6) received a LAA occluder (Watchman, n = 73; ACP-1, n = 59; Amulet, n = 3; PVI + LAA occluder, n = 91; and LAA occluder only, n = 44). Device implantation was successful in 131 (97%). Eight patients (5.9%) had major periprocedural complications (ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attacks, n = 4, tamponade, n = 2, device thrombosis, n = 2, Dressler syndrome, n = 1). The periprocedural complication rate was similar between concomitant procedure and LAA occluder only (8/91 vs. 5/44; P = 0.6). Twelve patients (9%) died (procedure-related, n = 2; 1%) during followup of 44 months (IQR: 43). MDCT(n = 77) at 6 weeks showed similar peridevice flow compared to TEE (TEE: 1.5 +/- 1.9 mm vs. MDCT: 1.1 +/- 2.2 mm, P = 0.25). Thromboembolic events occurred in 3 patients (CVA, n = 1; TIA, n = 2) during follow-up. In total, 41 ECV were performed in 26 patients (1.6 +/- 0.9/patient), 13 months (IQR: 24) after implantation (< 1 month: n= 8). No ECV-related clinical complications were observed.Conclusion: LAA occlusion is feasible with an acceptable safety profile and few events during long-term follow-up. ECV after LAA occlusion is feasible. MDCT could help to evaluate peridevice flow.

AIMS Circular irrigated radiofrequency ablation using the nMARQ catheter has recently been introduced for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). The aim of this study is to report the safety and efficacy of catheter ablation using this technology in patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF. METHODS AND RESULTS The data of a prospective registry describing the experience of a single operator using this technology on 327 consecutive patients were analysed. The mean procedure time was 69 ± 22 min for paroxysmal AF (n = 228) and 75 ± 23 min for persistent AF (n = 97). Follow-up was available for 206 (63%) patients for 6 ± 5 months (range 1-23, median 3.3). Single procedure success off antiarrhythmic drugs was 75% in paroxysmal AF and 52% in persistent AF. Including the 5% redo cases and those on antiarrhythmic medication, freedom from AF was documented in 90 and 83% of paroxysmal and persistent AF patients, respectively. There were no serious complications in the first 325 patients, but the last two consecutive patients (0.6%) developed atrio-oesophageal fistulas and had a fatal outcome. The catheter has been recalled from market. CONCLUSION The nMARQ catheter is a highly effective tool for treatment of paroxysmal and persistent AF. Nevertheless, the occurrence of life-threatening oesophageal fistulas is of major concern and requires further investigation.

Background: For successful cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) a spatial and electrical separation of right and left ventricular electrodes is essential. The spatial distribution of electrical delays within the coronary sinus (CS) tributaries has not yet been identified.Objective: Electrical delays within the CS are described during sinus rhythm (SR) and right ventricular pacing (RVP). A coordinate system grading the mitral ring from 0 degrees to 360 degrees and three vertical segments is proposed to define the lead positions irrespective of individual CS branch orientation.Methods: In 13 patients undergoing implantation of a CRT device 6 +/- 2.5, (median 5) lead positions within the CS were mapped during SR and RVP. The delay to the onset and the peak of the local signal was measured from the earliest QRS activation or the pacing spike. Fluoroscopic positions were compared to localizations on a nonfluoroscopic electrode imaging system.Results: During SR, electrical delays in the CS were inhomogenous in patients with or without left bundle branch block (LBBB). During RVP, the delays increased by 44 +/- 32 ms (signal onset from 36 +/- 33 ms to 95 +/- 30 ms; p<0.001, signal peak from 105 +/- 44 ms to 156 +/- 30 ms; p<0.001). The activation pattern during RVP was homogeneous and predictable by taking the grading on the CS ring into account: (% QRS) = 78-0.002 (grade-162)(2), p<0.0001. This indicates that 78% of the QRS duration can be expected as a maximum peak delay at 162 degrees on the CS ring.Conclusion: Electrical delays within the CS vary during SR, but prolong and become predictable during RVP. A coordinate system helps predicting the local delays and facilitates interindividual comparison of lead positions irrespective of CS branch anatomy.

Optimal atrioventricular delay (AVD) setting for cardiac resynchronisation therapy, i.e. biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure, remains a formidable challenge. Thus, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of different AVD on inter- and intra-ventricular resynchronisation using phase histograms of radionuclide ventriculography (RNV).

Distal embolization during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) occurs in at least 15% of patients and is a strong predictor of more extensive myocardial damage and a poor prognosis. Several devices are designed to evacuate the intracoronary thrombus or to prevent distal embolization. The Proxis device is a proximal embolic protection system that completely blocks antegrade flow during PCI. It may prevent distal embolization during recanalization of thrombotic coronary occlusion and thus improve outcome. We created a registry of 172 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who underwent primary PCI with proximal embolic protection and aspiration. The mean ST-segment elevation resolution (STR) at 1 hour was 77.7%+/- 15.2; STR was greater than 50% in 94% and greater than 70% in 72% of patients. The 1-year cumulative major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events rate was 10.5%. The overall mortality at 1 year was 2.3%.

Distal embolization during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) occurs in at least 15% of patients and is a strong predictor of more extensive myocardial damage and a poor prognosis. Several devices are designed to evacuate the intracoronary thrombus or to prevent distal embolization. The Proxis device is a proximal embolic protection system that completely blocks antegrade flow during PCI. It may prevent distal embolization during recanalization of thrombotic coronary occlusion and thus improve outcome. We created a registry of 172 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who underwent primary PCI with proximal embolic protection and aspiration. The mean ST-segment elevation resolution (STR) at 1 hour was 77.7% 15.2; STR was greater than 50% in 94% and greater than 70% in 72% of patients. The 1-year cumulative major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events rate was 10.5%. The overall mortality at 1 year was 2.3%.

Following the observation of difficulty in retrieving undeployed paclitaxel-eluting coronary stents (Taxus), we performed a retrospective analysis of 1,415 consecutive percutaneous coronary interventions and addressed the frequency of damaged or lost undeployed coronary stents. The incidence for Cypher, Taxus, and bare metal stents was 0%, 1.5%, and 0.3%, respectively (p = 0.0007). In the 11 cases involving Taxus stents, the treated vessel was invariably severely tortuous and/or calcified. The device was successfully retrieved despite being damaged and/or dislodged from the stent balloon in 5 cases; in 6 cases, stent embolization occurred. The clinical consequences were chronic claudication due to lower extremity device embolization in 1 patient and urgent surgical stent removal in 1 patient.

We describe the case of a 45-year-old male smoker who presented with an acute anterior wall myocardial infarction and a platelet count on admission of 1030000/mm3. Emergent coronary angiography revealead left anterior wall akinesia caused by a spontaneously resolved thrombosis of the left anterior descending artery with residual stenosis. Primary percutaneous coronary angioplasty and stenting were performed. Postangioplasty course was uneventful. He was diagnosed with essential thrombocythemia based on the findings of marked thrombocytosis of 1,030,000/mm3, splenomegaly and numerous clumping giant megakaryocytes on bone marrow biopsy. In addition to standard therapy with aspirin, heparin, betablocking agent, ACE-inhibitor and statine he received additional anti-platelet therapy with Clopidogrel. Cytoreductive therapy was not necessary.

Different embolic protection devices have been introduced for endovascular interventions: filters or balloon occlusion and aspiration systems. Despite widening use in a variety of vascular beds and clinical syndromes, little is known about the particulate burden liberated from different vascular beds and caught by different protection devices. We performed histologic and morphometric analyses of particulate debris captured during stenting of degenerated saphenous vein bypass grafts and native coronary arteries during acute myocardial infarction or during elective intervention and carotid arteries to assess the relative performance of different protection devices. We analyzed 232 interventions (90 saphenous vein bypass grafts, 77 native coronary arteries, and 65 carotid arteries) with 4 different devices (65 FilterWires, 99 Interceptors, 41 GuardWires, and 27 Proxis catheters) using the RapidVue particle analyzer. No difference in embolic volume retrieved was demonstrated between devices in saphenous vein bypass grafts and carotid interventions. A smaller volume of particulate debris was retrieved by the GuardWire compared with the FilterWire and the Proxis catheter in native coronary artery interventions. The Interceptor and the GuardWire captured more smaller particles than did the FilterWire or Proxis catheter. During saphenous vein bypass graft or carotid intervention, different embolic protection strategies were performed similarly. in native coronary artery stenting, however, proximal embolic protection retrieved larger amounts of debris than did distal filters or occlusion devices. These data may allow greater tailoring of embolic protection device development and application in specific anatomic locales. (c) 2005 by Excerpta Medica Inc.

UNLABELLED Volumetric blood flow (Q) determination requires simultaneous assessment of mean blood flow velocity and vessel cross-sectional area. At present, no method provides both values. Intracoronary Doppler-based assessment of coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) relies on average peak velocity (APV). Because this does not account for changes in velocity profile or vessel area usually occurring with flow-dependent vasodilation, results can be misleading. The aim of this clinical study was to validate against the current gold standard (measurement of myocardial perfusion reserve [MPR] by PET) a new, Doppler-based method for calculating coronary Q and coronary flow reserve (CFR). METHODS Doppler-based intracoronary Q was measured with a proprietary guidewire device in a nonstenotic coronary artery at baseline and during adenosine-induced hyperemic flow (140 mug/kg/min intravenously during 7 min). Three gate positions were assessed, of which 2 were lying within the vessel and 1 was intersecting the vessel. The zeroth (M(0)) and the first (M(1)) Doppler moments of the intersecting gate were used to calculate mean blood flow velocity (M(1)/M(0)) and vessel area (M(0)), and M(0) of the 2 proximal gates was used to correct for scattering and attenuation. CFR was calculated as hyperemic/resting flow with Q and compared with APV-derived CFVR and with the corresponding segmental MPR obtained with (15)O-labeled water and PET. RESULTS Q (CFR, 2.60 +/- 1.07) correlated well with PET (MPR, 2.58 +/- 1.11) (r = 0.832, P < 0.005; Bland-Altman limits, -1.42 to 1.09), whereas CFVR did not (r = 0.09, P = not statistically significant; Bland-Altman limits, -3.36 to 2.24). However, in vessels without dilation, there was no difference between CFR, CFVR, and MPR. CONCLUSION This procedure for intracoronary Q measurement using the proprietary Doppler guidewire system, which accounts for both changes in flow profile and changes in vessel area, allows invasive, accurate assessment of CFR even in the presence of flow-dependent vasodilation.

Positional anomalies of the heart are rare and are seldom found during routine physical examinations. We describe the case of a 25-yr-old Swiss airline pilot candidate whose aeromedical examination was normal except that an unusual ECG raised suspicion, leading to a diagnosis of dextrocardia with a normal arrangement of atria and abdominal viscera. This diagnosis in a pilot candidate should raise concern because a high percentage of such individuals have congenital heart defects. Further tests were conducted to rule out associated cardiac malformations, conduction anomalies, or rhythm disturbances. Testing also excluded other associated diseases such as primary ciliary dyskinesia and Kartagener's syndrome. Dextrocardia is not listed as a disqualifying condition in the applicable aeromedical regulations (Joint Aviation Authorities Medical Manual, Joint Aviation Requirements-Flight Crew Licensing guidelines). Therefore, after demonstrating that there were no physical, hemodynamic, or electrophysiological abnormalities, the candidate was allowed to enroll in civilian pilot training without restrictions.

BACKGROUND:Sirolimus-eluting stents and paclitaxel-eluting stents, as compared with bare-metal stents, reduce the risk of restenosis. It is unclear whether there are differences in safety and efficacy between the two types of drug-eluting stents.METHODS:We conducted a randomized, controlled, single-blind trial comparing sirolimus-eluting stents with paclitaxel-eluting stents in 1012 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. The primary end point was a composite of major adverse cardiac events (death from cardiac causes, myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven revascularization of the target lesion) by nine months. Follow-up angiography was completed in 540 of 1012 patients (53.4 percent).RESULTS:The two groups had similar baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics. The rate of major adverse cardiac events at nine months was 6.2 percent in the sirolimus-stent group and 10.8 percent in the paclitaxel-stent group (hazard ratio, 0.56; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.36 to 0.86; P=0.009). The difference was driven by a lower rate of target-lesion revascularization in the sirolimus-stent group than in the paclitaxel-stent group (4.8 percent vs. 8.3 percent; hazard ratio, 0.56; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.34 to 0.93; P=0.03). Rates of death from cardiac causes were 0.6 percent in the sirolimus-stent group and 1.6 percent in the paclitaxel-stent group (P=0.15); the rates of myocardial infarction were 2.8 percent and 3.5 percent, respectively (P=0.49); and the rates of angiographic restenosis were 6.6 percent and 11.7 percent, respectively (P=0.02).CONCLUSIONS:As compared with paclitaxel-eluting stents, the use of sirolimus-eluting stents results in fewer major adverse cardiac events, primarily by decreasing the rates of clinical and angiographic restenosis.